Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

Dear Team,
Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
Thanks & Regards
Nireesh

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

Similar Messages

  • Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

    Hi
    How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
    Regards
    Umapathy

    hi,
    Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
    Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
    > vendor evaluation
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
    Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
    weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
    Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
    Price 1 5
    Quality 1 5
    Delivery 1 2
    Gen. service/support 1 1
    Ext. service provision 1 2
    Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
    In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
    specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
    automatically.
    You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
    form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
    Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
    Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
    An example :-
    How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
    "On-Time Delivery Performance"?
    The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
    (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
    You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
    will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
    delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
    September 15.
    In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
    the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
    effect on the score for this goods receipt.
    However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
    which the vendor will actually adhere to.
    The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
    into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
    are the movement types 101 and 105.
    Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
    but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
    in Customizing.
    Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
    time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
    not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
    that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
    bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
    for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
    conjunction with quantity reliability.
    Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
    If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
    high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
    low percentage variance:
    The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
    the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
    The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
    12 / 20 x 100 = 60
    If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
    (12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
    If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
    the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
    statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

    Hi,
    I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
    Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
    Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind regards

    hi,
    Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
    Variance             Score
    -99.9%               1
    +99.9%              100
    A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
    check the following link.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    regards
    sumit simran

  • Vendor Evaluation:Reason for ZERO SCORE CALCULATION for SOME CRITERIA

    In performing Vendor evaluation few vendors get ZERO as the SCORE for some of the criteria.
    At our location,
            1. WEIGHING KEYS
                        EP - Equal weighting
                        UP - Unequal weighting
            2. EVALUATION CRITERIA
                       11 - Price
                       22 - Quality
                       33 - Delivery
                       44 - Service
    I would like to know the internal procedure of data collection of any vendor for calculating the SCORE for any CRITERIA.
    Thus would be able to understand the reason for ZERO SCORE calculation in any CRITERIA for any vendor.
    Edited by: Joy Ghosh on Feb 20, 2009 10:04 AM

    Hi,
    In vendor evaluation system gives zero score if  no transaction has been run with respect to this vendor in the spcified criterias.
    1. If no purchase Order is generated with respect to this vendor for a material system will give zero score for price criteria and delivery criteria.
    2. If QM module is not active in the system it will show the quality score as zero.
    3. If services are not maintained for the vendor then it will give zero price for services.
    regrds,
    Bharat.

  • Vendor Evaluation-- Points and Scores

    Dear Gurus,
    On what basis are the scores assigned for the percentage that is assigned.  For Eg. what do you mean by the following:
    Percentage   Score
    20.0-        10
    10.0-        65
      2.0-       100
      2.0        100
    10.0         50
    what does 20.0- mean and how is a score of 10 assigned to the same.same is the case for all the entries.
    Kindly explain me the entire process as to what does this percentage mean. Assume that we are evaluating the vendor based on Price.

    Hi,
    The system calculates the scores for vendor evaluation as follows.
    Calculating the Overall Score
    The system derives the overall score from the scores for the various main criteria, taking the
    weighting factors assigned by Purchasing in the system settings for each main criterion into
    account.
    The following example explains this process:
    Example
    The table below shows the scores for a vendor and their weighting factors:
    Main criterion Score Weighting factor
    Price 70 40
    Quality 85 25
    Delivery 50 10
    General service/support 50 5
    Converting Weighting Factors into Percentages
    To make the weighting factors clearer to the user, the system converts them into percentages.
    1. The system adds the factors together and equates the total with 100 %:
    40 + 25 + 10 + 5 = 80 equals 100 %
    2. To express the individual weighting factors as percentages of 100%, the system first divides
    100% by the sum of the weighting factors:
    100 / 80 = 1.25 %
    3. Then the system multiplies the weighting factors the buyer assigned to the main criteria by
    this figure:
    40 x 1.25 = 50.00 %
    25 x 1.25 = 31.25 %
    10 x 1.25 = 12.50 %
    5 x 1.25 = 6.25 %
    4. The following are the results of percentage of overall score
    Main criterion Score Percentage of overall score
    Price 70 50.00 %
    Quality 85 31.25 %
    Delivery 50 12.50 %
    General service/support 50 6.25 %
    However, internally, the system uses the weighting factors to compute the overall score.
    1. The scores for the main criteria are multiplied by their weighting factors.
    70 x 40 = 2800 points
    85 x 25 = 2125 points
    50 x 10 = 500 points
    50 x 5 = 250 points
    2. Total points = 5675.
    3. This total is divided by the sum of the weighting factors:
    5675 / 80 = 70.94 points
    The vendor is awarded an overall score of 71 points
    Please go though this link for clear understanding.
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards,
    Manik

  • Vendor Evaluation - Creating new partial criteria

    Hello,
    My client wants to use Vendor Evaluation but wants to use another date to evaluate its vendors.
    Is it possible to define a new partial criteria based on a date which are not the standard Confirmation date or expected receipt date and use it in automatic valuation of the principal criteria? like a date which one manages in a table Z?
    Are there any user exits or Badi´s to acomplish this?
    Anyone had experience with this already. How did they resolve it?
    Thanks for any clue.
    Aart

    Use  MM06L001  the user Exit for determination of ratings in vendor evaluation .

  • Vendor evaluation report for a definite time period

    Hi Experts,
    Vendor Evaluation Summary Report required for the vendors for a definite time period. Output of the report should show the scores of vendors for criteria like Price, Delivery, Quality, Service and summation of all these scores.
    Please let me know if any standard report is available which can fulfill my requirement.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kishore.

    Hi,
    ME6H report is not fulfilling my requirement since i require the output format in the form like vendor, vendor name, plant, price, delivery, service, quality and the summation of scores given to these criterias.
    Thanks
    Kishore.

  • Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month

    Dear Gurus,
    I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
    Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
    can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
    Thanks & Regards
    Akshay

    I don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
    A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
    So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get  a 100 %

  • Vendor Evaluation Price Level  For services

    Hi expert, I've seen that the Main Criterion "Price" is just for materials, and I wanted to know whether there is a way of Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria for services.
    I also wanted to know if there is any other standar criterion for evaluating services.
    Thanks !!

    Hi,
    Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
    C Determination from quality rating of service
    D Determination from timeliness rating of service
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
    At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
    And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it during ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

  • Vendor delivery rating for scheduling agreements

    Dear All,
    I need to check vendor delivery rating for sch. agreements. Mc$6 is not usefull because of sch. lines it works fo Po's. please suggest me how to get this.
    Regards
    MSR

    Hi,
    Vendor delivery rating is calculated via the formula actual delivery date (in me38) -statistical deliver date( in me38)/ statistical delivery date.  points need to be maintained for ratio which is calculated in the above case in the path spro -materials management-purchasing -vendor evaluation-maintain purchase organisation data-points for automatic criteria
    after which execute the t code me63 for automatic valuation
    Regards
    Sandeep

  • Vendor evaluation - General Service and support

    Hi
    What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
    How the scores are calculated for this?\
    If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
    Regards
    Soumen

    Hi,
    Following are the answers for your questions.
    What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
    Ans: - Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    How the scores are calculated for this?
    Ans: - For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
    C Determination from quality rating of service
    D Determination from timeliness rating of service
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
    At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
    If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
    Ans: - And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it duirng ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

  • Vendor Evaluation BAPI?

    Dear Gurus,
    Are there any BAPIS available for vendor evaluation?
    I had created a few vendor evaluation criteria that requires manual input of the vendor score. However, these scores cannot be further breakdown to a plant level.
    Thus, I am trying to find a bapi that allows me to update vendor evaluation scores for those criteria I defined at the plant level.
    Please advice. Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Joseph

    Hi W1N,
    If we run ME6H, there is an option to break down the scores to the plant/site level. I was wondering if there are any BAPIs that can achieve the same functionality.
    Based on this report, I think that in the background, SAP still tracks the scores at plant level?
    Best Regards
    Joseph

  • ME6H :  point score for vendor evaluation

    Dear guru ,
    In vendor evaluation analysis for on-time delivery performance
    I can see fields point score 1 and point score 2.
    Can  you explain me which is the difference between these two fields ?
    Thanks in advance.

    HI,
    ON TIME DEL 1-it is for a specific period(day,month,yr)
    ON TIME DEL 1-cumilative value

  • Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

    Hi,
    I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
    1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
    2. Morale
    These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
    Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and  2) Service Timeliness are already available.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chetan Shah

    Hello Chetan,
    have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
    Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
    Kind Regards
    TomT

  • System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

    HI....
    I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
    Regards
    SARFRAZ

    Hi,
    Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
    1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
    2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
    3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
    4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic  criteria for each percentage vainance
    Hope this fulfils your query
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot connect to the OLAP source - when Scheduling WebI Report

    Hi, I am confused by seeing the above mentioned error on random days.... Scenario - WebI report scheduled daily: Some days the report works fine and other days  it is not processing correctly but gives me this error message "Cannot connect to the OLA

  • Can't send email to Hotmail and Yahoo ??

    Hello everyone, I tried to send email to my adress in Hotmail or yahoo and doesn't work. I have another POP address and it works perfectly. Anyone know what i have to do to send mail to Hotmail and yahoo. thank you for any reponse. Rania+

  • How do I save an internet file

    I save all my bills to my filing cabinet after viewing them on line. How can I do this on my ipad

  • PLEASE, HELP ME IF YOU CAN!!

    hi guys I am a window 7 user , photoshop element 9 tells me "Unable to continu e because of a hardware or system error. Sorry, but this error is unrecoverable! " I would appreciate any response or help on this problem!

  • Apple TV2 slowing down whole wireless network!!

    Bought apple tv(2nd gen) yesterday. I've got a 10MB optical fibre connection (so it is a constant 9.5 to 10MB). Using apple airport extreme base Station with latest software. Stream movies, music, photos etc. No problem!! BUT - I rented a movie last