VF01 : Invoive with a wrong Net Value !

Hi,
i have generated an invoice with Tcode VF01, but the Net value is different from the result of Quantity*Unit price (defined in Tcode VK11).
Please what could be the reason of that ?
Regards.

Dear Jehade,
Not very sure, but check Pricing Date (VF02 > Line Item data> Item detail) as proposed by the System.
Now, validate the same with Condition-record "validity on" in VK12.
Alternatively, go to Header Data details (Menu Bar --> Go To --> Header --> Header --> Tab: Condition) in VF02,
Down there, Tab: Update, click for options. Select "B - carry out new pricing". Now check the Net Value in Document.
Best Regards,
Amit

Similar Messages

  • Invoice created with wrong net values at header & item

    Hi Guys
    Due to a wrong user exit, system created few invoices with wrong net values at header & item.
    Now system does not allow to cancel those billing documents, showing error message - inconsistency in data.
    Eg:  Billing Header net value is 10000
           Billing Item net value is 5000
    when I try to cancel this billing document, cancellation document created with header net value as 5000 & item net value also 5000.  So, it says original invoice & cancellation invoice having different values.  It is not possible to cancel.
    Please suggest me how to correct wrong values at original invoice, which are already released to Accounting.  Or else, how to cancel those kind of invoices.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Uma

    Hi,
    In the original invoice and cancellation invoie is created there is a difference in 5000. It will not allow further cancellation of the invoice because it is already cancelled. I don't know whether there is anyway to reverse the cancellation invoice document.
    If it is there then reverse the cancel invoice document and create an invoice correction request document (RK)
    Try to replicate the scenario in your test system.
    Prase

  • Invoice IDOC is sending wrong Net value

    Hi Champs,
    We have an interface whetre Invoices will be sending to the third system through IDOCS.
    These are prepared and being transferred by using Standard FM Invoice_Inbound_Asynchronous. But there is a very peculiar problem when sending some invoices, like some invoices are pushing ITEM wise wrong amount thruogh segment E1EDP01 -> E1EDP26 003 -> BETRG (Field). I could not get from where this amount is being picked.
    Could any one help me if you face similar type of issue.
    In the IDOCS flow of last two years, only 6 IDOCS are sent with wrong amount until now.
    Thank You
    With Regards,
    Ravi kanth Yechuri.

    Friends,
    can you please hep me out whether i can apply any SAP note or so...
    Thank You
    Ravi Kanth Yechuri

  • Credit memo request with zero net value

    Hello all,
    when we create a credit memo request (VA01, doc type CR) and put a material quantity into the credit memo request that falls below the scale in VK13, the net value for the material will be zero.
    We do not want to allow to save the credit memo request with a zero net value, but SAP will just allow us do that.
    I was wondering if there is a way to pop up a warning or even an error message that avoids saving the document in case of a zero net value?
    Thanks
    Anne

    Hi,
    You can make the condition type (for which $0.00 is not allowed) as mandatory condition type in the pricing procedure. By this way the system will give error and wont allow to proceed any further unless the data is complete. (make sure this is not affecting your regular sales order cycle).
    Or if you just want to give a pop-up message then you can use user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV45AFZZ
    Regards,

  • IDOC Invoic02 - Segment E1EDP26 (net value) is missing because of val. 0,00

    Hello everyone,
    I have an idoc of type Invoic02 and the segment E1EDP26 with qualifier 003 (net value) is missing if the net value is 0,00u20AC. If the value is greater than zero, the segment is perfectly there.
    Does anyone have an idea how I can achieve that this segment is always there independent of the value?
    Thank you!
    Best regards
    Andreas

    I'm replying to this old post since it comes up in Search. We had the same issue - E1EDP26 with QUALF 003 would not be in the IDoc, but it was required by the receiving system.
    Here is a reply I received from SAP:
    This is the standard system behaviour and this is hard coded in the
    system.
    Please see the following from note 635337 (Conditions are missing in theIDoc):
    o The value of the condition must be <> 0.
    You may change the code in LVEDFF0F by removing the IF and ENDIF
    statements and then E1EDP26 segment 003 will always be output
    but this would be a modification and would be subject to the conditions
    from note 170183.
    *- Absoluter Nettowert
    IF NOT tvbdpr-netwr IS INITIAL. <<<
    CLEAR int_edidd.
    CLEAR e1edp26.
    int_edidd-segnam = 'E1EDP26'.
    e1edp26-qualf = '003'.
    PERFORM get_e1edp26_tcurx_currency USING tvbdpr-netwr.
    MOVE tvbdpr-netwr TO h_newr_btrg.
    MOVE e1edp26 TO int_edidd-sdata.
    APPEND int_edidd.
    PERFORM customer_function.
    ENDIF. <<<
    Since we already had a user exit EXIT_SAPLVEDF_002 implemented for the IDoc extension, instead we resolved it by adding the following code (fragment) there:
    DATA ls_e1edp26    TYPE e1edp26.   "document item pricing data
    DATA lv_kwert      TYPE kwert.
    CASE int_edidd-segnam.
      WHEN 'E1EDP26'.
        MOVE int_edidd-sdata TO ls_e1edp26.
        IF ls_e1edp26-qualf = '001'.
          IF xtvbdpr-netwr = 0.
            CLEAR: ls_e1edp26, lv_kwert.
            ls_e1edp26-qualf = '003'.
            ls_e1edp26-betrg = lv_kwert.   " so that decimals/format are the same
            SHIFT ls_e1edp26-betrg LEFT DELETING LEADING space.
            MOVE ls_e1edp26 TO int_edidd-sdata.
            APPEND int_edidd.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.      " ls_e1edp26-qualf = '001'
    ENDCASE.

  • VF01 : Invoice without FI document because Net Value is 0,00 ?

    Hi,
    I create an invoice with Tcode VF01 in refernce to a billing document, the system create an invoice but not the FI document, it shows this message : "An accounting document is not required for this billing document"
    Diagnosis
    The billing document has the net value '0' and does not create an accounting document. Despite this, the posting status 'C' (Posting document has been created) is set internally for this billing document.
    Please i want to have a price in my invoice to post an FI document correctly, how to solve that ?
    i hope your help
    Regards

    Hi,
    You can not post to accounting with ZERO(0) balance.If you want to post to accounting,you should have minimum of $0.01.
    system message is correct.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Net value issue while creating return order with reference to billing

    Dear All,
    I created SO / DEL/ BILLING for qty 100 say net value-20000.When i created Return order with  refrence to billing document,
    net value appearing same ( 20000) for 50 quantity.Pl do advise asap as its required urgently.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    raj
    Edited by: raj_sapsd on Aug 20, 2010 9:18 AM

    surelly problem in VTAF
    F2 to RE
    DATAT: 103
    DATAT: 103
    DATAT: 003
    Coping requirement 021
    item level TAN  and ietm cat proposal G2N
    DataT: 153
    Datat: 104
    datat: 004
    Coping requirement 303
    Update doc Flow X
    only possibilites Removed my Moderator
    Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Aug 21, 2010 9:31 AM
    Please avoid asking for points

  • Problem with depreciation posting for an asset with a '0' net book value.

    Hi,
    I have a problem with depreciation posting on one asset. I think it should not be calculated and posted at all.
    On 1st November 2010 (our Fiscal year starts on 1st November) there was acquisition posted to an asset and then it was reversed on the same day - so the net book value was '0'.
    In AFAB depreciation run for April 2011 - it posted depreciatoion of 0.01 Euro, so now the book value is -0.01.
    Do you know how this could have happened and what can I do to get the value of this asset back to 0?
    Thank you,
    Karol

    Hi Murlidhar,
    Thank you for your reply.
    I just have one doubt - as depreciation of 0.01 Eur was posted in previous period leaving net value of asset equal to -0.01 Eur.
    Shouldn't I get ritd of this asset value before I proceed with the steps you suggested?
    I think it is not possible to reverse the depreciation - so I struggle to find a way to bring asset value back to zero.
    Thank you,
    Karol

  • No Incompletion Log for Sales Order with net value as zero

    Hi all,
    There is an Inbound IDOC which creates a Sales Order.
    When we check the IDOC, we find that it has got 4 line items (E1EDP01). However, for all the items except the third one (for example), the segment E1EDP05 is filled. In the segment E1EDP05 the field KRATE contains the corresponding net value for the respective line items.
    Then when we check Sales Order which is created, we find that the third line item (for example) has the net value as zero. In this case, ideally there should have been an entry in the Incompletion Log. However, it does not happen so.
    I suppose the issue is with the third line item in the IDOC for which the segment E1EDP05 is not present. I have debugged the corresponding FM is IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS, but was unable to find any clue.
    Please let me know the reason for this.
    Thanks and regards,
    Anishur

    In routine interpret_idoc_orders the item conditions are filled by calling
    WHEN 'E1EDP05'.
           MOVE IDOC_DATA-SDATA TO E1EDP05.
           PERFORM ZUORDNEN_ORDERS_E1EDP05.
    In case KRATE is empty no values are transferred to the order
        IF NOT E1EDP05-KRATE IS INITIAL.
          PERFORM IDOC_CUR_MOVE USING E1EDP05-KRATE XKOMV-CURRDEC
                                      XKOMV-KOEIN
                                      XKOMV-KBETR D_FLAG_P-PKON.
        ENDIF.
    If that is a valid scenario, you need to adjust your incompletion procedure in customizing to include the net value on item level so any missing value is reported.
    If this is not supposed to happen you might want to hook into one of the user exits in the idoc and in case KRATE is missing let the idoc fail.
    Hope that helps,
    Michael

  • Sales order report with Net value (NETWR) and Tax amount (MWSBP)

    Hi all,
            I would like to know if somebody know if exist a report of sales order where it can see the Net value and the Tax amount per sales order.
    Regards,
    Mariano.

    You can read those details directly in the table VBAP.
    There are fields for COST, Subtotal1, to subtotal 6, which carries values for netvalue, discounts etc. Depending on the system pricing procedure sub total set-up you can read the tax from one of the sub-total fields.
    You can develop an ABAP query by joining tables VBAK and VBAP, to get the required outputs if needed. Or you can download the VBAP values into an Excel application, where user can manipulate the details.
    Regards,

  • Not able to get net value in billing document vf01.

    Hello Sir,
    I am trying to create an invoice for  milestone billing plan. I have maintained copy controls  at item level as follows
    coplying req.  002
    vbrk/vbrp        001
    pricingtype     D
    billing qntty     A
    while i save contract and trying to create billing document  system is not able to show net value in billing document. 
    Please guide me to get the net value in the billing document.
    looking forward to reply.

    Sir, May I know what is the process to confirm milestone billing. as per my knowledge we release billing block and then billing document is processed.
    In my case even if i release billing block billing document succesfully created and saved but net value seems zero.
    I am not aware of complete proces.
    reply would be appreciated.
    thanks

  • ME2K - Wrong net order value

    Dear All,
    In ME2K, System is not showing the net order value in the report. I have found a OSS note 985769 and implemented the same.
    Now system is showing the netorder value in the report but its not calculating the net order value. Its just showing zero value.
    Help me if you have faced this problem and fixed it.
    Regards
    Senthil Kumar

    Hello Senthil,
    Net order value in ME2K corresponds to net value stored in  accounting  (table EKKN-NETWR) which is filled only in case of service purchase order. So for service PO, system will display this in ME2K or ME2J report which are based on account data display but not for material PO.
    This is not correspond to EKPO-NETWR.      
    Please, consider that EKKN-NETWR is not the same as EKPO-NETWR. They come from two different database tables. In the accounting view of the report, we list what is read from the database table EKKN. In the basic list, we read from EKPO. EKKN-NETWR is only used in service items, so you will see zero values for non-service item categories. The F1 help might have the sameexplanation for NETWR, and I could see how this might cause some confusion. However, the help is based on the data element, which is the same for both tables. It would not make sense for us to change thisreport.
    I hope I have been able to clarify your doubts.     
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • In Credit Memo Net Value is coming 0.

    Dear SD Expert,
    I have created Credit Memo with Reference Credit memo request. While creating Credit memo (VF01) the Net Value is 0. But the Billed quantity is coming correct in the system. In Credit Memo request(VA01) every thing is ok, Quantity and Net Value are correct. But in credit memo net value is not coming as per credit memo request. I have also maintained Copy control(VTAF) for this. In copy control I have maintained following fields.
    Billing document to Sales document
    Choose sales document type [G2] and Billing document type [F2]
    Go to Header details
    [52] = Billing document header
    [052]:
    This routine transfers general billing header data from the reference document to target document.
    [103]:
    This routine transfers business data Ex: Inco-terms from preceding document to new document.
    [003]
    = Billing header partner:
    This routine copies Bill u2013 to u2013 party form invoice to sales document.
    Copying requirements [021]:
    (Billing header)
    This routine checks Sold u2013 to u2013 party, sales area, and currency is same or not when copying billing document to
    sales document.
    Item level
    = TAN
    153 = Item from billing document:
    This routine copies all relevant data from preceding document to new
    document at item category level (invoice to invoice cancellation).
    104 = Business data item billing:
    This routine copies business data from invoice to sales document.
    Ex:
    Inco-terms at item level.
    004 = Billing item partner:
    This routine copies Bill u2013 to u2013 party or payer from invoice to sales document.
    Copying requirements [303]
    = Always an item
    All standard items are copied into target document
    [] Uncheck copy schedule lines
    [X] Update
    Pricing type [D] = Copy pricing elements unchanged
    As per given information kindly guide me where I was wrong and what Input is requires?
    Regards,

    Hello Mancy,
    Indeed Naveen is correct to use Transaction VTFA.  Sample Standard Settings:
    HEADER:
    Target Billing Type = G2, From Sales Doc Type CR
    Copying requirements = 001:Header/order/related (can be customized of course)
    Hint: You may COPY item number from reference
    ITEM:
    Target Billing Type = G2, From Sales Doc Type CR
    Item Category Proposal <--THIS IS OPTIONAL (i suggest to leave this blank and input something only if you have a special business requirement wherein you need to change the item category in your credit memo, you may check Help/F1 for sample scenarios)
    Item Category = G2N <--this is the item category coming from your source document i.e. item cat. from your Sales Order
    Copying Requirements = 002: Item/order-related
    Data Transfer Routine = 002: Ord-rel.credit memo
    Pricing Type = D: Copy pricing elements unchanged
    Please let me know if this helps you.
    Kind regards,
    Eva

  • Contract net value for Header Statistics is not correct

    There is issue with value contract. The net value for Header Statistics is not showing correctly for some contracts. Especially, when we delete the PO line items or reverse all entries (GR and IR) for PO line item.
    Contract has one line with account category ‘U’. The target value is 300,000.00 and total quantity released to date is 160,000. The net value for Header Statistics should be 140,000 but it is showing 600,000 which is over (double) the target value and user cannot release any further PO reference to this contract.
    Earlier I defined net price for line item 300,000 and I changed net price to zero and execute report RM06ENP0 but it doesn’t work.
    Please share your experience and thoughts.
    Thanks,
    Shah.

    Hi Jurgen,
    There are few Purchace orders with multiple line items and each line item for Purchase orders referencing the same line and same contract.
    There is only one Purchase order has two deleted lines against this contract.
    Theses deleted line's net price has changed to zero and there is no PO history.
    Contract released order value is correct as there is only one line, but net price is wrong. and user is getting error for target value is excedeed by $nnn when trying to create purchase order.
    Thanks,
    Shah.

  • Contract Release Value is not updated with Confirmation or Invoice value

    The release value for a contract in SRM EBP shows the value of purchase orders created using that contract.  It does not take into account confirmation and/or invoice values.
    For example I create a PO for 10 items at £100/each using Contract ABC.  The total value of the PO is £1000 and the release value contract ABC would be £1000.  If I then only confirm and invoice 5 items (£500) for the PO, the release value of contract ABC stays at £1000 even though I would expect it to update to £500
    Therefore the release value of the contract could be incorrectly overstated if purchase orders are created against the contract but not actually invoiced/confirmed for their total value.
    Please could you confirm the correct functionality and how I could find out the the true invoice value of purchases made using a contract?

    Hi
    <u>Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?</u>
    <b>Meanwhile, please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will help in this case -></b>
    Note 622045 Net value in release overview of contract is incorrect
    Note 493519 Release quantities are not updated
    Note 1108322 BBP_CONTRACT_CHECK wrong calculation of values
    Note 1102886 Contracts: Lesser Field length for Target Value
    Note 1082548 Check of Released quantity and released value in contract
    Note 656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
    Note 874920 Currency not allowed to be changed for a 'Released' Contract
    Note 703771 Resetting release values during purchase order item deletion
    Note 643823 BLAREL: Incorrect values in service segment
    Note 519879 BBP_CTR_MAIN: No message when values in Contract are reset
    Note 520734 Target value not converted if currency is changed
    Note 528897 Documents not displayed in contract release order overview
    Note 430373 BBP_CON_MNT: No releases available
    Note 491993 Entry of contracts with target values
    Note 437491 Purchase contract: Incorrect update of the call-off values
    Note 406799 BBP_CON_MNT: Fields after contract release ready for input
    Note 398168 Purchase contract: Target value is not changed
    <b>Do let me know.</b>
    Regards
    - Atul

Maybe you are looking for

  • Keep losing my sound when playing pogo

    I lose the sound playing on pogo game site.  New version of flash player installed, happens randomly

  • Photoshop CS6 extended-Windows explorer crash

    Hi! I run Photoshop CS6 extended, student edition and recently, I'm having an error every time I work with Photoshop. Windows Explorer doesn't respond.  The screen freezes and it's lagging so much.  My software is updated. Windows updates are done as

  • Pass on excise related duties and CVD

    Dear experts, i have a scenario in which i have to pass on all excise related taxes and CVD to another plant (depot) by STO.What should be the procedure . waiting for ur valuable input thanks in advance subhassh kulkerni

  • Debit Memo Error

    Dear Gurus, While creating Debit Memo we are facing with the below error. "Create billing document" not allowed (Sys. status Cost, object VB0000480100000010) The process was working fine till the client has updated the patch. What would be the possib

  • HT201359 How do I cancel a reoccurring subscription ?

    How do I cancel a reoccurring subscription?