View original contract number on reference contract

Hi all
Can someone please tell me where i can view the orginal, referenced contract number on the new contract created?
I have created a contract(ME31K) with reference to an old one and need to view the referenced contract number.
Any assistance would be appreciated.

Hi,
You can go to Header --> Details (F6)
There you will see the refference data , you have:
Quotation Date;
Your Reference;
Our Reference;
I hope this solve your problem.
Regards.
Antonio

Similar Messages

Custom view in contract account screen

We added custom fields/view in contract account screen. The new section is confidential and can only be seen if there is proper authorizaion.
I was able to hide the fields in the new view/section but not the view/section itself. If the user has no proper authorization, all the fields are hidden but it still leaves a box with nothing in it.
Is there a way to hide this box or to only display the view/section according to certain conditions?

Hi Bluemountain,
I do not believe there is an option to hide the section / view completely through any of the configs. Since SAP is building that subscreen area based on config, it would not be possible to suppress it through code either.
Warm Regards,
Sumith

View a Contract

Hi,
Can anyone help me to find a function module which can be used to view a contract created in R/3?
Thanks & Regards,
Vineetha

Hi Vinay,
I tried with the functiom module BAPI_CUSTOMERCONTRACT_CHANGE.But i am not able to view the contract details.I feel that this function module is for editing an existing contract.
Please help me to find a solution.
Waiting for your reply,
Vineetha

How to find the number of references created for a given object ??

How to find the number of references created for a given object in a big application environment.
That means, if i give any object name (of my application) as input, then how can i find the[b] number of references created for that particular object ??

Please do not post the same question multiple times.
As for your original question, there is no direct way to do it.
Especially not the way you phrased it,
since objects don't have "names".
Applications also don't have "names".
They have classes and instances.
Also, there are 2 related issues, and I'm not sure which one is the one you asked.
#1. Finding the number of references to the same object.
Eg.
Map<String,String> a = new HashMap<String,String>();
Map<String,String> b = new HashMap<String,String>();
Map<String,String> c = a;In this case, there are only 2 objects.
The first object has (at least) 2 references pointing to it.
The second object has (at least) 1 reference pointing to it.
(There may be more, if the HashMap library keeps
references to these things, or if the HashMap object has
some internal cyclic references...)
If you're asking this, then it can't be done.
It's an active research topic in universities
and software research labs, called "alias analysis".
Type it in google, and you'll see people are working hard
and having little success so far.
#2. Finding the number of instances created from a class.
In this case, what you have to do is to add a counter to
the constructor of the class. Every time an object is constructed,
you increment the counter. Like this:
   class MyClass
       public static int counter = 0;
       public MyClass( ) { counter++; }
    // Then later in your program, you can do this:
    MyClass a = new MyClass();
    MyClass b = new MyClass();
    System.out.println(MyClass.counter); // It should show 2Note: you won't be able to do this to every class in the system.
For every class you care about, you have to modify its constructor.
Also: when an object is deleted, you won't always know it
(and thus you won't always be able to decrement the counter).
Finalizers cannot always work (read Joshua Bloch's
"Effective Java" book if you don't believe me), but basically
(1) finalizers will not always be called, and
(2) finalizers can sometimes cause objects to not be deleted,
and thus the JVM will run out of memory and crash

Custom File Name-Original File Number doesn't work. Why?

I want to export and rename some files with the "Custom File Name-Original File Number" option. Yet this doesn't seem to work, and I wondered what I might be doing wrong. The filename will only rename as the custom text.
The sample file name shown underneath has a dash after the custom text bit, but then the extension only eg Newname-.tif
I am now using LR 4.2 but I seem to remember doing this renaming OK with an earlier version (though I can't remember which). This suggest that either there is a problem with this specific version or that I have something set differently to the way I had it initially. I am hoping the latter is the case. Any suggestions as to how to fix this would be welcome!

I am sorry to report that i don't know how to create a screenshot. However, what I am getting, exact;ly is this:
From Library grid view: F2 or Library>Rename Photo
Then little screen appears with heading Rename Photo:
File Naming> set to Custom Name - Original File Number
Custom Text> NewFilenameHere
Example: NewFilenameHere-.tif
Clicking on OK changes the filename to just the custom text without the original file number. Original File name shows in metadata eg DSC01129-Edit.tif
The only way i seem to be able to get the original file number with the custom text is to include it manually as part of the custom text.

DB view with flexible number of columns?

In my Oracle 10 I have these tables
Customer table:
id      customer
1       John
2       Bob
Item table
id      item_name
1       itemA
2       itemB
3       itemC
4       itemD
Purchase table:
id      item_id date    customer_id
1       3       070202 2
2       6       070203 5
...I'd like to create a view like this:
        itemA   itemB   itemC   itemD   ...
John    3       4       0       0       ...
Bob     0       3       0       0       ...
...The view showed John purchased itemA 3 times, item B 4 times. Bob purchased itemB 3 times. This assume each customer only by one item at a time, which is a reasonable simplification of my situation.
Such a view (with variable number of columns) is needed not in our web application but also provide an understandable data source for non IT professional to use report software. If my approach of solving this problem is completely wrong, I'd also like to know what's the common practice. Thank you very much in advance!
Message was edited by:
user609663

I have tried to ask the question in a way that greatly simplify current problem to make it easy for others to understand without having to explain a lot of background information and 'the situation'; it seems I over-simplified the issue to make it even not worth solving or a wrong question being asked. So here I explain the complete problem and look for advice again (be prepared, pretty long description following:). I am a purchased customer of Oracle 10 DB and I reasonably expect being considered as Oracle user looking for help rather than students trying to play smart with assigned data normalization course exercises.
We are working on a system that collects data from interview results. The questionnaires for the interviews are formatted with a coded question, followed by user's answer to the question, like the following:
     Question Code   Question content   Answer
     H001            ...                123
     H002            ...                45
     H003            ...                33
     H004            ...                66
     H005            ...                4,66
     ...             ...                ...The users answer question with a digit, for some special questions, e.g. H005, they are allowed to answer with a set of digits. There are thousands of interviews each year, the simplest solution to collect the interview answers is to use such a db table:
simple_db_table:
id   H001 H002 H003 H004 H005 H006 H007
1    123   45    33    66    4     82    9
...This solution have two problems:
1. It doesn't properly store answers to questions that requre a set of digits, like H005.
2. The number of questions and their codes change from one survey to another, but the table have fixed number of columns and column names.
And two benefit:
1. With such simple table, people who use report software that directly access oracle db can creat their reports on easy-to-understand data presentation;
2. calculation based on questionnaire data is simple, e.g. get the average of H007/H009 for questionnaires that have H002 > H003 * 600 would be:
SELECT SUM(H007) / SUM(H009) FROM simple_db_table WHERE H002 > H003 * 600;Next solution we have normalized tables:
questionnaire_entry_table:
id                 NUMBER
questionnaire_name CHARquestionnaire_definition_table:
id                 NUMBER
questionnaire_id   NUMBER
question_code      CHAR
question_content   VARHCARinterview_table:
id                 NUMBER
questionnaire_id   NUMBER
date               DATEquestionnaire data table: itv_data
id                 NUMBER
interview_id       NUMBER
question_code      CHAR
answer             NUMBERWith the new structure, it just turn the problems of simple_db_table to its benefit and simple_db_table's benefit become the problem:
1. Personnel who use report creation software feel too confused to make report based on such tables, because they do not understand the normalized modeling. In our case, effective training is difficult because there will be many geographically distributed people make reports based on this structure and they have lower IT knowledge than database administrators. These personnel can make reports based on simple_db_table.
2. calculation based on questionnaire data is very difficult.
To explain 2, let's take the same example, we still wish to get the average of H007/H009 for questionnaires that have H002 > H003 * 600, my method is:
setp 1: create a view with by using:
       CREATE VIEW v (id, H002, H003) AS
       SELECT a.itv_id, a.H002, b.H003
         FROM itv_data a, itv_data b
       WHERE a.interviewee_id=b.interviewee_id
         AND a.question_code='H002' AND b.question_code='H003';step 2: create a stored procedure to get the calculation result:
       CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE get_result (result OUT NUMBER) IS
         sh007 NUMBER := 0;
         sh009 NUMBER := 0;
       BEGIN
         SELECT SUM(H007) INTO sh007 FROM itv_data
           WHERE itv_id in (SELECT id FROM v WHERE H002 > H003 * 683);
         SELECT SUM(H009) INTO sh009 FROM itv_data
           WHERE itv_id in (SELECT id FROM v WHERE H002 > H003 * 683);
         idc := sh007/sh009;
       END get_idc;As you can see the calculation become much more complex and might involve overhead.
There might be better way to calculate the result that I don't know yet. We have some 100 different formulas to calculate different results, so it's important to get them right and efficiently.
The best solution seems to me is that to create such a view from itv_data and other tables so that to reflect the same structure of simple_db_table. So here comes the question I originally asked how is it possible to create a view with flexible number of columns. I made the very simple example in my original posted message wishing to get an idea of this is possible or the way to go.
I may be taking a completely wrong approach to attack the problem, e.g. perhaps there is a simpler way to get_result from itv_table and for report creation users I should use a metadata layer on top of the normalized table structure (e.g. by using Metadata Query Language from Pentaho BI). But anyway I'd like to get some insightful ideas from the forum. Again thanks for help in advance.

How to find the number of references to an object in a big application

How to find the number of references created for a given object in a big application environment.
That means, if i give any object name (of my application) as input, then how can i find the[b] number of references created for that particular object ??

Please don't post the same question multiple times.
I've answered your question in the other thread here:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4312939

Use SQL function to get the original order number using the invoice number

Hi All,
wondering is someone can help me with this challenge I am having? Often I need to return the original order numbers that created the resulting invoce. This is a relatively simple seriese of joins in a query but I am wanting to simplify it using a SQL function that can be referenced each time easily from with in the SELECT statement. the code i currently have is:
Use SQL function to get the original order number using the invoice number
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.fnOrdersThatMakeInvoice(@InvNum int)
RETURNS nvarchar(200)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @OrderList nvarchar(200)
SET @OrderList = ''
SELECT @OrderList = @OrderList + (cast(T6.DocNum AS nvarchar(10)) + ' ')
FROM OINV AS T1 INNER JOIN
      INV1 AS T2 ON T1.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry INNER JOIN
      DLN1 AS T4 ON T2.BaseEntry = T4.DocEntry AND T2.BaseLine = T4.LineNum INNER JOIN
      RDR1 AS T5 ON T4.BaseEntry = T5.DocEntry AND T4.BaseLine = T5.LineNum INNER JOIN
      ORDR AS T6 ON T5.DocEntry = T6.DocEntry
WHERE T1.DocNum = @InvNum
RETURN @OrderList
END
it is run by the following query:
Select T1.DocNum, dbo.fnOrdersThatMakeInvoice(T1.DocNum)
From OINV T1
Where T1.DocNum = 'your invoice number here'
The issue is that this returns the order number for all of the lines in the invoice. Only want to see the summary of the order numbers. ie if 3 orders were used to make a 20 line inovice I only want to see the 3 order numbers retuned in the field.
If this was a simple reporting SELECT query I would use SELECT DISTINCT. But I can't do that.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Mike

Thanks Gordon,
I am trying to get away from the massive table access list everytime I write a query where I need to access the original order number of the invoice. However, I have managed to solve my own problem with a GROUP BY statement!
Others may be interested so, the code is this:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.fnOrdersThatMakeInvoice(@InvNum int)
RETURNS nvarchar(200)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @OrderList nvarchar(200)
SET @OrderList = ''
SELECT @OrderList = @OrderList + (cast(T6.DocNum AS nvarchar(10)) + ' ')
FROM OINV AS T1 INNER JOIN
      INV1 AS T2 ON T1.DocEntry = T2.DocEntry INNER JOIN
      DLN1 AS T4 ON T2.BaseEntry = T4.DocEntry AND T2.BaseLine = T4.LineNum INNER JOIN
      RDR1 AS T5 ON T4.BaseEntry = T5.DocEntry AND T4.BaseLine = T5.LineNum INNER JOIN
      ORDR AS T6 ON T5.DocEntry = T6.DocEntry
WHERE T1.DocNum = @InvNum
GROUP BY T6.DocNum
RETURN @OrderList
END
and to call it use this:
Select T1.DocNum, dbo.fnOrdersThatMakeInvoice(T1.DocNum)
From OINV T1
Where T1.DocNum = 'your invoice number'

Originating document number not updated for one invoice line item

Hi,
We have a invoice document number in which the originating document number is not updated for one of the line items ,this is order related down payment invoice .May be this is due to system inconsistency so is there any SAP note to overcome this problem.
Best Regards,
Rohit

Dear All,
I found out the problem for not updated in F-04. "While create the receipt document in GL master Open item management maintained box was not checked". It can be found in BSIS table - OI Management'.
Is there any other way to clear this document.
Thanks...

I need to view the photo number.

Anybody can help, I need to know the photo number. How to view the photo number in iPhoto for iOS version.?

Apple Support Contact
Apple Support contact - Telephone

How to export file with original filename number suffix, but with more digits

Is there a way to keep the original filename number suffix, but change the formatting of the number, adding leading zeros for instance?
When I import photos from my camera I like to rename them, and give them sequential numbers, e.g. "2015-01 Hamburg 1.cr2", "2015-01 Hamburg 2.cr2", "2015-01 Hamburg 10.cr2", .. "2015-01 Hamburg 134.cr2", and so on.
Normally when I export photos I like to keep the file names exacly as I imported them (except the extension) e.g. 2015-01 Hamburg 1.jpg, "2015-01 Hamburg 2.jpg", .. "2015-01 Hamburg 10.jpg", .. "2015-01 Hamburg 134.jpg".
But sometimes I would like to export them with leading zeros, typically when adding photos to a web site or blog where there are sort mechanisms that only support simple sort algorithms based on file names, meaning the sort order of my photos with their original file names would become "2015-01 Hamburg 1.jpg, "2015-01 Hamburg 10.jpg", .. "2015-01 Hamburg 134.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 2.jpg".
So I would like the file names to be "2015-01 Hamburg 001.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 002.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 010.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 134.jpg".
By keeping the original file number suffix I can easily go back to the original file whenever I need to, and the sort order would work even with simple sorting.
The export Filename Template Editor gives quite advanced support for numbering files when exporting, see attached screenshot. There's support for exporting files with custom file names, and adding sequence, total and image number with padding (up to 9999/####). But those add new numbers, they do not consider the original filename number suffix. If I use the "Image # (001)" for instance, my example above would export as "2015-01 Hamburg 001.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 002.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 003.jpg", "2015-01 Hamburg 004.jpg", if those were the four photos I wanted to export, making it hard for me to trace them back to the original photo.
I have found no way of adding such padding on the original file number.
Does anyone know if this is possible or have suggestions for a workaround?
It shouldn't be too hard for Adobe to support this I'd imagine.
export pattern rename files file_number filename_template_editor

I do not know if you can do what you explained above, but there is a workaround to this (and a way to avoid having to do it in the future):
In the Library module, make sure your images are sorted by Capture Date (this will put them in the right order, even with suffixes like 1, 13, etc.)
Select all images, and then Rename them, using a Custom text followed by a Sequence number. The Custom text in this case should be the original name (such as, 2015-01 Hamburg, as in your example). Make sure the Sequence number is formatted with enough zeroes to include all the numbers in your images.
In the future, when you rename images during Import, make sure you select the Sequence number format that will include all the needed zeroes, so you don't have to go through this again.

How to get a Reversal document number from Original Document Number ?

Hi,
Say I have a Original Document number. This document has been reversed.
I am using table BSEG. Original Document Number for any Reversal Document is stored in field "BSEG-REBZG"
My query is that now I have the Original Document Number. How can I get the Reversal Document from this Original Document number ??
OR in simple words, Is there any possible way to find out if my original document has been reversed ?
I need help to write a select query i.e the tables and fields.
Please help.
Thanks.

Hello,
Check the fields:
BKPF-XREVERSAL: Reversal Indicator (1: Reversed Document, 2: Reversal Document)
BKPF-STBLG: Reverse Document Number.
BR,
Suhas

Please enter your original serial number, or insert your logic XSkey

I just re-installed Logic Pro on my new Mac, but upon launching, it asks me for serial #. Apparently, I'm using the "upgrade" serial, so after I put in the number, it says "Please enter your original serial number, or insert your logic XSkey". I've searched my big Logic 8 box, but all I have are manuals and disks, with no serial #. I can't find the old dongle either, since I've been using without it on my previous computer. How do I get past this?

Thanks for that post Bee Jay,
Just tried doing this, didn't work, after closing logic and re-opening without the XSKey it brings up the same 2 boxes, first to insert my upgrade serial and then the original serial. I really hope there is going to be an upgrade to fix this problem as otherwise it looks like ill be stuck with XSKey after all.
Message was edited by: Ern dsm

Original serial number when upgrading from Trial version

Hi,
I just bought LR 5.5 because my Trial version was over. When trying to put in the serial number, it says "This is an upgrade serial number. The serial number for your previous version of Lightroom is also required." I do not have the original serial number. Am I missing something here?
I had bought Lightroom 5 stand alone and the email I got says I bought following:
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5
US$79.00
Upgrade, Mac/Win, English, Download
Is it not the right version to buy?
Thanks.

I am having the same issue now too - I purchased the "Lightroom 5 Standalone perpetual license - Mobile capabilities not included" today and it won't let me register with the serial number I got in the e-mail confirmation because it advised I needed the original product serial number too. No where in the purchase process of the Stand Alone did it say anything about this being an upgrade. This is very deceptive by Adobe. Is the Stand Alone product really just an upgrade? How do I get this resolved?
Lightroom 5 standalone
Perpetual license – mobile capabilities not included.
Lightroom 5 standalone
Perpetual license – mobile capabilities not included.

I purchased and downloaded Lightroom 5.5. After installing it, I was prompted for the serial number. When I entered it an error message appeared saying it was an upgrade serial number and I need to enter my original purchase number. This was my original p

I purchased and downloaded Lightroom 5.5. After installing it, I was prompted for the serial number. When I entered it an error message appeared saying it was an upgrade serial number and I need to enter my original purchase number. This was my original purchase, not an upgrade. Now what do I do?

It sounds like you bought an upgrade from Adobe. How much did you pay? The upgrade is about $80, and the non-upgrade is about $150. If you bought an upgrade version and had no previous version, you would see what you're seeing.
If that is the case and I were you, I'd call Adobe, and arrange for a refund and to order the correct version.
Hal

View original contract number on reference contract

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for