VL10 - Collective Processing setting a field as required

I would like to know on the VL10 screen how to set the field "shipping point" as a required field.  Thanks M. Grantham

hi,
you can either create a screen transaction in SHD0 or explre a field exit for the same.
saurabh

Similar Messages

  • HCM F&P - How to set the field as Required based on drop down values

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement to set the Date field as mandatory when a particular value is selected in drop down list. I have already tried with MessageBox though it displays the error message but process moves further i.e. on clicking Check & Send button it throws an error message but still it moves further and i can see only Send button. Ideally it should halt there itself.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jitesh Talreja

    Thanks for your valuable inputs
    Chintan
    I have already tried this. It only highlight the field with the red border but still allow to move further.
    Mukesh
    Yes, we can definately control this from the backend but that would be the last option i should execute. Ideally, this is something to be controlled in front end itself
    Poornima
    By setting the field attrbiute Required will set the field mandatory as a whole irrespective of drop down values or any other UI element.
    Regards,
    Jitesh Talreja

  • Setting form fields to required not working in Adobe Acrobat XI Pro

    This should be a simple matter. However, I'm stuck in a rut with it, and cannot seem to get out.
    I have created a form. All I need is for users to be prompted that they have to complete the form field when they try to tab or click out of that particular field where there needs to be information input. I have tried the following "on blur" java script code:
    if (!event.value) {
        app.alert("This field is required. Please enter a value.");
        event.target.setFocus();
    What continues to happen is when the user clicks out of that field, the error message comes up asking them to click "okay." The problem is that the error message does not go away after the user clicks it.
    What I've learned is that if you right click on a field and click "set as required field," it doesn't work in the way I need it to. In fact, it hasn't been working at all for me.
    Does anyone have a simple suggestion? I more than willing to try anything at this point.

    OK, so the custom calculate script for field B could be something like:
    (function () {
        // Get field values as strings
        var sA = getField("A").valueAsString;
        var sC = getField("C").valueAsString;
        var sD = getField("D").valueAsString;
        // Only perform the calculation if all fields are filled
        if (sA && sC && sD) {
            var sum = +sC + sD;
            event.value = sum;
            // Alert the user if the sum is more than A
            if (sum > +sA) {
                app.alert("Error message goes here");
        } else {
            // Blank this field if all fields are not filled in
            event.value = "";
    Instead of (or in addition to) an app.alert popup, you could place this message in a read-only form field, and clear it if there is no error condition.

  • Set field to required using javascript

    Hi Everyone
    I am looking for a method to set a field to required inside javascript. i.e.
    if (this.rawValue==1)
    { ConditionalField.Setattribute=required}
    else
    ConditionalField Setattribut=optional
    Thanks for your help
    Regards
    Meir

    Thanks Peter and sorry for the mixup. Fortunately I found a solution so no need to repost it even.
    Regards
    Meir.
    P.S. Keep up the good work on the forum!

  • Collective Processing VL10 is not grouping deliveries for same sales parame

    Hi.
    Created multiple sales orders for same sales parameters like ship to, sold to, sales org, etc.
    When tried to process collectively the delivery ceation via VL10, system generated group for each delivery selected instead of creating group for multiple deliveries.
    When I compared my client's system config with Standard config client, it is exactly same in terms of all parameters, scenario profile, delivery creation profile,etc. The standard system works as expected and grouping the deliveris and create one group for multiple deliveries.
    The group type is L and delivery categories we are tryign to group is J & T.
    Thanks,

    hi sridhar
    Collective processing of deliveries means delivering the few order collectively. that means one delivery document for  all orders.
    In vl10h u can access only orders due for delivery.
    first of all mark the orders line items to do collective processing deliveries.

  • I have set form fields as User required and yet the form still prints/save when empty.

    I have set form fields as User required and yet the form still prints/save when empty. I also have an email button on the form but that works correctly by not allowing the user to email the form with the required fields empty.
    What script do I need to additionally restrict both printing and saving if the required fields are empty?
     You would think that just setting that option would restrict those functions the same as it does for the email button. 
    Please be specific with your response if you are gracious enough to offer one. I have been searching the forum all morning for the answer to this and I really didn't understand any of the solutions offered to others enough to use those in my own form.
    The required fields are:
    Social (social security number)
    Name
    Headquarters
    Residence
    The next question I have is if there is a way to make individual signature fields mandatory if they are digital signatures?
     In other words, I don't want the individual to be able to email the form to the next person if he/she hasn't applied their digital signature.

    Saving can always be done, even when mandatory fields are empty.  This is by design.  And that is correct.  Suppose you have a big form and 2 people need to fill it out.  How can you fill out a first part and then send it to the second person without saving.
    Same for printing.  Same for your signature fields.
    What I would do, is to put a "watermark" on the form that you show on preSave and prePrint if the form is incomplete.  Just a static text on your form.  Then the user will see that they need to do more.  Also, on preSave and prePrint, you can show a warning popup to tell the user about the missing fields.  You can then still cancel their action if the user decides not to save/print anyway.

  • How to set a signature field as 'Required' with selection of a Check Box

    I have a set of 3 check boxes and would like to set a unique combination of pre-existing signature fields as 'required' for each respective check box.
    Given Check Box names of Box1, Box2, Box3 and Signature Field names of Sig1, Sig2, Sig3, can someone provide example JavaScript for setting Sig1 and Sig3 as required upon a Mouse Up of Box 1?
    Otherwise, can someone let me know if this might be more trouble than it's worth?
    Thanks!

    Sorry to keep you waiting Greenstead - and thank you for responding.
    My need for this feature, however, has passed.
    I do have another question or two, but will post as a separate thread.
    Thanks again

  • Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size

    Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size to 7 inches on the long edge. My exported result is 457 dpi and sized at 3200x2134 pixels.. Any ideas on why this is happening and what I can do to correct it?

    The DPI setting in a digital image has no meaning at all. You need to learn how to calculate what you need in your exported image. The only measurement in a digital image that has any meaning is the number of pixels in each direction. It doesn't matter what you set that DPI to (actually it's PPI or pixels per inch). The image will have the same number of pixels regardless of the setting. If you need an image that is 5 x 7" (for example) at 200 PPI then you would want an image that measured:
    5 x 200 = 1000 pixels
    7 x 200 = 1400 pixels
    So you would need an image that is 1000 x 1400 pixels to have a 5 x 7" image at 200 PPI. The reason your exported image had such a high PPI setting is because you specified the number of inches you wanted the image to be. And there were enough pixels in the image that it calculated out to be that high PPI setting.
    I apologize, I don't explain this very well. But you need to learn to do the math to determine how large you really want your exported images to be.

  • CProjects - Set-up field control - Usage of conditions

    Hello
    In cProjects, in set-up field control it is possible to adjust behavior (display, updatable, mandatory, u2026) field by field.
    My questions are:
    - Where to find the complete list of conditions available?
    - Is any condition is usable everywhere, for example C001 Object is released on a DAG Document (means the object link to this document is released)?
    - Is there a condition with a meaning like u201CThe object is in creationu201D (to have for example a phase description not updatable after creation)?
    - How to create its own conditions?
    Thanks for your help.
    Rémy
    Here you can find a list of conditions for the main objects.
    CTO (Checklist)      C001 Object is released
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C001 Object is released
    MTG (Project Participant)      C001 Object is released
    PPO (Phase)      C001 Object is released
    TTO (Task)      C001 Object is released
    MTG (Project Participant)      C002 CATS is active
    TTO (Task)      C002 CATS is active
    TTO (Task)      C004 Confirmation for task
    MTG (Project Participant)      C005 Role start and finish are specified
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C006 Object has a superior phase
    TTO (Task)      C006 Object has a superior phase
    TTO (Task)      C007 Phase without approval
    TTO (Task)      C008 Appr. is in process, granted, rejected
    CTO (Checklist)      C009 Ind. 'Changeability' to 'Cannot Be Chgd'
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C009 Ind. 'Changeability' to 'Cannot Be Chgd'
    CTO (Checklist)      C010 Ind.'Changeability' to 'Partlly Chngble'
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C010 Ind.'Changeability' to 'Partlly Chngble'
    PPO (Phase)      C011 Project Type 'Initiative'
    PPO (Phase)      C015 Constraint: As soon as possible
    TTO (Task)      C015 Constraint: As soon as possible
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C016 Constraint: As late as possible
    PPO (Phase)      C016 Constraint: As late as possible
    TTO (Task)      C016 Constraint: As late as possible
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C017 Constraint (Finish Date): None
    PPO (Phase)      C017 Constraint (Finish Date): None
    TTO (Task)      C017 Constraint (Finish Date): None
    TTO (Task)      C018 Task is a summary task
    TTO (Task)      C019 'Remaining Work Man.'indicator is active
    TTO (Task)      C020 Object is part of a project version
    ITO (Checklist Item)      C030 Access to Forecasted Dates
    PPO (Phase)      C030 Access to Forecasted Dates
    TTO (Task)      C030 Access to Forecasted Dates
    OAG (Object Link)      C100 Object has not been specified yet
    RAG (Checklist Reference)      C200 Checklist reference was created
    ATO (Approval)      C300 Approval has the status: Created
    EAG (Project Element Link to Role)      C400 Status: Staffing in Process/Complete
    MTG (Project Participant)      C500 Status: Staffing in Process/Complete
    MTG (Project Participant)      C501 Confirmation for project role
    BAG (Link to Business Partner)      C502 Distribution is active
    MTG (Project Participant)      C502 Distribution is active
    MTG (Project Participant)      C503 Status: Staffing in Process
    MTG (Project Participant)      C504 Cost/revenue rate is initial
    TTO (Task)      C504 Cost/revenue rate is initial
    MTG (Project Participant)      C505 Org. Unit (Staff. Manager) is changeable
    MTG (Project Participant)      C506 Org. Unit (Cand. Manager) is changeable
    MTG (Project Participant)      C507 Staffing Manager is changeable
    MTG (Project Participant)      C508 Candidate Manager is changeable
    SAO (Individual Approval)      C600 Approval allows decision maker change
    DAG (Document)      C700 cProjects file is checked out
    DAG (Document)      C701 Plug-in for documents is used
    DAG (Document)      C702 Document has status 'Not in Process'
    DAG (Document)      C703 Document is changeable
    DAG (Document)      C704 Link to document template
    DAG (Document)      C705 Document in projekt-/checklist template
    DAG (Document)      C706 cProj. file is checked by current user

    Hi Matthias
    I am trying to setup field control to make a bespoke field in a bespoke tab toggle between READ only and Editable. 
    I have gone through number of posts and the SAP note you mentioned. I have setup the entire configuration required and it is still not working.
    What confuses me is that, to setup a field control dynamically, is it all done via configuration?. Is some coding still required in the VIEW methods?. I am setting up a debug breakpoint in the class method that is created for the condition I created, but the program is not stopping there so I think the condition method is not being called.
    Please can you give some more details.
    Thanks
    Raj

  • Project Server workflow freezes on setting Project field

    Hi,
    In Project Server 2013 I've created a workflow with the SharePoint Designer. I want the workflow to set the project stage status and then a Project Field. Setting the project stage status works fine, but when I insert the action of setting the project field
    the workflow freezes and the Submit button is greyed out. Remove this action, re-publish the workflow and everything works fine. There are no required or read-only fields in the workflow stage and the custom field I want set is a plain project level custom
    field with no special properties. It is not on any pdp, nor in any view, because I'm only using it for OData reporting. Setting the field as "workflow-controlled" doesn't make a difference. It is the same in Project Online. What am I missing?   

    Setting a project field should not be a problem or holding in anyway, what kind of field is it and what value is being provided ?
    Take a look at the article here, it explains the process of
    creating an approval, make sure you are following the same process, it would be advisable to go through these module on working with workflow
    http://blogs.office.com/b/project/archive/2012/09/18/demand-management-sharepoint-designer-project-server.aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ee767694.aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj163494.aspx
    On a side note curios to know how the publishing was done via SharePoint designer ?
    Thanks | Sunil Kr Singh | http://epmxperts.wordpress.com

  • How to populate a set of fields multiple time in the page ?

    Hi All,
    JDev Ver : 11.1.1.5
    I have a requirement as follows,
    My page contains 1. Add Button
    2. Five fields.(one input text and four select one choice)
    The fields are like one input text and remaining select one choice. And also these fields contains validations.
    Actions
    On click of add button , I have to show the fields , similarly I have to add one more set of fields in the page below the first set when I click the add button, Like this I will add as many as I need.
    How to achieve this requirement,
    1. Do I need to generate the view objects dynamically from managed bean ?
    2. Do I need to create a custom component ?
    For Time being , I have added 3 set of fields pages and showing one by one. I want to do this dynamically.
    Please let me know the suggestion for this Requirement.
    Thanks,
    Gopinath

    Hi,
    to do this:
    1. reate a managed bean that exposes a HashMap property. The HashMap is of type e.g. Map<Person>
    2. To create a new set of fields, add a new entry to the HashMap and refresh the af:form. The af:form contains and af:forEach that you use
    to iterate as often as you have entries in the HashMap. Each text field you bind to #{bean.HashMapProperty['key'].attribute}, for example
    #{bean.HashMapProperty['key'].FirstName}
    #{bean.HashMapProperty['key'].LastName}
    #{bean.HashMapProperty['key'].EmployeeId}
    3. When the user updates a field, the HashMap is updated based on the "key"
    4. The managed bean should be in viewScope and referenced from the field's value property
    Frank

  • Design the New process set up for Materials in one physical stock plant

    Hi Experts,
    The requirement is one physical plant as two different logical plants in the system. The main issue is how to administrate or how to find the set up which allows one Physical warehouse in Hamburg which we have supplying two Logical warehouses in the system without having thru really physically separate the warehouses into two different ones. Materials physically will be only for one warehouse.
    Requirement is for Design the New process set up for Materials in one physical stock serving plant into two different system plants.
    Most of the things are pointing in the direction that order Backlogs will not be converted into new organization. We have backlogs for the material requirements for purchase orders, sales orders whatever we have in the current setup; then there will have all are new orders from the certain dates taking in the  new organization set up. These backlogs are very long at least three to four years.
    We would like to find some way to have the all the material requirements ending up in one basket instead of two baskets. That still be able to deliver at least in system point of view from two different baskets.
    We need to do analysis on one physical stock serving plant into two different system plants that could be done either by material master data or as i understood that could be from PS side.
    can any one please tell me how we can maintian this setup in the system.
    Please provide your valuable inputs.
    Brgds,
    RK

    RK,
    Sorry, the creation of such an end-to-end solution is outside the scope of an online forum.  Most consulting companies would send a multi-disciplinary team to perform this task, and would take several weeks to research your requirements, and come up with a prototype.
    Sales order availability checking is described in SAP online help
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/93/744b51546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
    I will say this.  If your goal is to have two plants, with two company codes, and you wish to only procure or produce in one of the plants, then generally I would recommend using Special Procurement via Stock Transport Order (in standard SAP, Special Procurement 40).  This based on a very small knowledge of your requirements.  I have already cited the Sap online help for special procurement.
    SAP online help for Warehouse management is at
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f8386f4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    As you begin to read the required topics, I am certain you will realize that this task is beyond the capability of an untrained person.  I again suggest that you search for professional consulting services to assist you in this project.  It will be money well spent.
    I am now closing my responses to this thread.  Good luck in your project!
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Concurrency Visualizer Extension (VS2013): "An unknown error occurred while trying to start the collection process."

    Not sure if this is the right place to ask about this but since my question concerns an extension I'll give it a shot.
    I'm trying to use the Visual Studio 2013 Concurrency Visualizer extension to debug a simple test console application. I've set executive paging to disabled in the registry as it directed and hit "add SDK to project" in the concurrency
    visualizer menu options. And of course, restarted my computer to apply the settings. When I try to "start [the concurrency visualizer] with current project" I get an error popup:
    "An unknown error occurred while trying to start the collection process."
    I really need the concurrency profiling to start debugging contention in my multithreaded application. Prompt assistance would be much appreciated.

    Hi,
    This forum is to discuss and ask questions about extending and integrating with Visual Studio (using the Extension Manager, building VSX containers for deployment, Visual Studio SDK, and more), Visual Studio Online (REST APIs, service hooks, and OAuth),
    and Team Foundation Server.
    You have problems when using Concurrency Visualizer Extension, please ask in
    the page under "Q AND A". Since Concurrency Visualizer is a diagnostic tool, you can post this issue in
    Visual Studio Diagnostics (Debugger, Profiler, IntelliTrace) forum too.
    Best regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Managing a set of documents that require approval, for each project stage

    Good day to all,
    I am new to SharePoint but I have dived in head first due to my job.
    The users I am dealing with need a solution where they can upload a specific set of named document types (example: project charter, site plan, schedule, costing approval, designs) but all documents will be scanned to PDF before being uploaded. Every stage
    will have its own set of documents with the same named document types. Each document has to be checked and the approved.
    I know I can use a workflow for the check and approve part.
    What I don't know is how to create a "blank" document set for uploading PDF files. In other words, I envisioned that I would have a document set of sorts where I can enter common information such as the Project Number, and the Project stage, and
    then I would have multiple upload fields that are named by the types above (project charter, site plan, etc.) so that the users will know exactly what documents are needed to complete the document set.
    Can anyone assist me in find a solution?
    Thanks and best regards.

    Hello,
    One thing to note is that the document set content type in SharePoint is analogous to a folder; you don't specify upload fields on the document set, but users can upload any number of documents to the set once it is created. You can have fields of information
    on the document set, and different fields of information on the documents within the set.
    With that in mind, the best way to accomplish what you're looking for may be to have columns on the document set that indicate which required documents have been uploaded.
    Document Set content type columns:
    Project Number (text)
    Project Stage (choice)
    Project Charter Complete (yes/no)
    Site Plan Complete (yes/no)
    Schedule Complete (yes/no)
    Costing Approval Complete (yes/no)
    Designs Complete(yes/no)
    Document content type columns:
    Document type (choice)
    It can either be a manual step so that when a user uploads a document, they then mark the corresponding yes/no checkbox, or it could be automated with a workflow.

  • How can I set the field ICt in component table of the Tasklist as "Input" ?

    Hi experts,
    How can I set the field ICt (BOM's Item Category (POSTP)) in component table of the Tasklist as "Input" Status (The system is in gray now).
    I can define the different Category value by IB01 or IB02,then I can select them at the Tasklist's component table.But sometimes I need batch input such as LSMW,so pls kindly tell me how to setup it,thanks!
    Yinjun

    Hi,
    BOM is created with some component and item category.
    In task list when you go to component, in normal case one selects and copies BOM over there by clicking component selection button.
    Once BOM is copied over there the BOM item category will get copied. As it is BOM item category in Task list it is greyed and it will get copied automatically from BOM.
    You specify item category required by you in IB01 or IB02 and then use that BOM in task list. Go to componenet tab and click component selection button. Once BOM is copied over there the BOM item category will get copied

Maybe you are looking for