Website protrudes beyond the 800 pixel wide limit on right, in IE

Hi - please help me with this, somebody - it's driving me mad. the URL is http://www.wuizmendez.co.za. I know enough to be dangerous, and am on the point of leaving the more complicated bits to a 'real' web designer. My problem is similar to someone who earlier who had the six nested tables. :O
But I can't locate the source of the problemo.

Nope, that isn't it either. So (what I should have done in the first place) I checked a page (Course 3) within DW by hitting the 'check page' button for browser compatibility.
(Have subsequently come to a few fixes, so ignore the gray text unless you're already bored/compulsive) This is just background.
And it said in the left panel:
that there was a problem in line 15 (see below in bold) and in the right hand panel is said:
Found 3 errors in external css files
Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2
</style>
<script src="Scripts/AC_RunActiveContent.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Wuiz Mendez | Course 1</title>
<link href="wmstyles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script type="text/javascript">
function MM_CheckFlashVersion(reqVerStr,msg){
  with(navigator){
    var isIE  = (appVersion.indexOf("MSIE") != -1 && userAgent.indexOf("Opera") == -1);
    var isWin = (appVersion.toLowerCase().indexOf("win") != -1);
    if (!isIE || !isWin){ 
      var flashVer = -1;
Then I checked Course 1 and it said the same thing but this time in line 20:
Found 3 errors in external css files
Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2
</style>
<script src="Scripts/AC_RunActiveContent.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Wuiz Mendez | Course 1</title>
<link href="wmstyles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script type="text/javascript">
function MM_CheckFlashVersion(reqVerStr,msg){
  with(navigator){
    var isIE  = (appVersion.indexOf("MSIE") != -1 && userAgent.indexOf("Opera") == -1);
For the page Course 2 it complained about line 15 again:
Found 3 errors in external css files
Found 2 errors in external css files
and again, this is line 15, with the same bit underlined in green that I've made bold here.
On the index page, the problem is on line 36 -
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Wuiz Mendez | Welcome!</title>
<link href="wmstyles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<style type="text/css">
<!--
body {
font: 100% Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
and in every case, it  says - Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2
Finally, on the enrolment page, the problem is on line 39:
<title>Wuiz Mendez | Enrolment</title>
<link href="wmstyles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<style type="text/css">
<!--
body {
Right - now after writing all that down, here, I then went to the css file and checked that too, and sorted out a few oddities. In one place I had put maxi-width on a box size. Which isn't an option, it's either a value or its 'normal'. Anyway, after correcting these issues, e.g. in another place I had put a number only, instead of 12px - when I checked again, Course 1 and 2 were fine, and I think Course 3 was as well but now it isn't. The index and enrolment page also still have the margin on the right.
I think it's external style sheets and not in the css. So am checking but can't see anything invoking padding on the right or margins.
Into the ether I send my quiet desperation and will go off and make some coffee. According to Voltaire, this increases intelligence and God knows I need it.
S

Similar Messages

  • Any workarounds for the 2880 pixel size limit?

    I have a client that would like a Flash animation that's 5440
    pixels wide, to span 3 widescreen monitors for a tradeshow
    presentation. Flash won't let me make the stage any bigger than
    2880 - does anyone know any ways around that limit?
    I Googled it and found out that you used to be able to scale
    the SWF beyond 2880 in an HTML file, and it would show well using
    Flash Player 7, but apparently that trick no longer works in
    Players 8+.
    Any other ways to make a single SWF that can span 3 large
    monitors?
    Thanks in advance,
    - Frank

    The problem here is the legacy flash document size constraint of 2880 x 2880 pixels. Why is this limitation still in place? Most screen have landscape orientation and we have this square constraint that turns out to be a waste if you are developing for larger screen displays and anything that is 4:3 or 16:9. Something does not add up here. What if someone needs to make a dual wide screen HD show that measured 3840 x 1080 pixels? We can do setup documents at 3840 x 1080 pixels in PowerPoint, PDF, Silverlight (at least this is what I have read regarding Silverlight), but not in Flash. Why not?
    If Flash is a platform… then it needs to spread its wings a bit and embrace all the potential uses that are non-web. Flash represents multimedia delivery to millions, but shackling it to the 2880 x 2880 pixel limitation for a document size is problem for many people now and looming for those working toward have the flash engine as a core component in media delivery. At least give us a dual Wide screen monitor resolution of 3840 x 1080 pixels instead of a square of 2880 x 2880 pixels – which no one really uses (at least I have not seen any sqaure screens lately). Hey, if Adobe decided to shave off on the unused pixels from the 2880 height (2880 – 1080 = 1800) of the format you get an additional 1800 pixels that could applied where it is needed – to the width of the document size… giving us a 4680 x 1080 pixel document. This could then be used for immersive simulation, game situations, and real-world wide-screen experiences.
    Sorry I don't have an answer, just the same question. "Any workarounds for the 2880 pixel size limit?"

  • HT5076 Hi. My version of garageband seems to be missing the 'sections' tab in the settings, meaning I don't have the option to make a song beyond the 8 track default limit. I live and downloaded the App in Australia. Just wondering if section selection is

    Hi
    My version of garagband for the iphone 4 is missiong the 'sections' tab in the settings. It means I can't record beyond 8 bars. I downloaded the app in Australia and just wondering if there are different versions or this is an issue anyone else in Australia is facing? Any help would be appreciated
    Ta
    wildman

    this is what I mean...

  • Pb G4 1.67Ghz running OS 10.4, right side of the screen 2, pixel wide vertical lines, a few days later colors posterized on pics and vid. Vertical lines don't show screen capture, but pics still posterized. Hardware test from disk shows ok.

    Right side of screen started showing 2, pixel wide vertical lines. A few day later colors in pics and vid posterized. Vertical lines don't show in screen capture but pics still bad. Ran hardware test from disk, ok, adjusted color in sys prefs, new profiles a bit better but still bad, mpeg worse, jpeg bad. No better in new user account. Now a month later, right side has 8 vert lines and occasionally a slightly darker area in bottom corners for a few seconds. Reset pram, battery plugged into adaptor 99%. I can notice, for a slit second, when the screen saver is on, when I move cursor to get back to desktop, true color of  image can be seen for a flash of a second.

    sorry, was in a rush, any suggestions to fix or ideas of what has gone wrong

  • Guys, i want to ask on how to resize the images into 1200 pixels wide?

    Guys, i want to ask on how to resize the images into 1200 pixels wide, how to do it? and what are the step by steps on doing that? thank you!!!

    See this link: http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-3691

  • Cannot send attachment beyond 1.5 MB, the MaxFileSize parameter is already set to 6 MB and the exchange server's limit is 10 MB

    Hi Experts,
    I cannot send attachment beyond 1.5 MB, the MaxFileSize parameter is already set to 6 MB and the exchange server's limit is
    10 MB.
    What could be the issue?
    aa

    But I am able to send the same  attachment from my web browser
    aa
    I am not expert in Exchange but web browser may not be using SMTP protocol? Check with your SMTP/Exchange Admin about "4.3.1 Message size exceeds fixed maximum message size"
    4.3.1 is response from the server.
    Balmukund Lakhani
    Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other users find a solution quicker
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    My Blog |
    Team Blog | @Twitter
    | Facebook
    Author: SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn -
    Paperback, Kindle

  • In Keynote '09 distribute objects horizontally/vertically is distributing objects beyond the slide. How do I make the left-most and right-most objects the limit of the distribution?

    I used to have the option of distributing objects so that they would overlap, but the current "distribute" tool is functioning as if overlapping isn't allowed. The result is that the objects move beyond the limits of the slide. Any suggestions?

    I know that's what *should* happen, but it just doesn't. I've made screen-grabs of the entire process:
    Like I said, this use to work just as you've described it. Is there a box I accidentally selected? I just really don't understand why the tool has changed the way it functions...

  • How can I convert my logo 300dpi (274 pixels wide) from EPS to Gif format?

    I have a logo that needs to be fixed for web purposes. It looks great in print but very poor quality on screen. I need one for my website and HTML email newsletters, along with a high quality GIF 300 DPI (274 pixels wide) for a HTML coded signature. I tried it in Photoshop to save this file as GIF format. But it seems my files is 274 pixel but it is 96 dpi rather than 300dpi. How can I convert it from EPS to 300 DPI (274 pixels wide) GIF file format??
    I have an EPS file for it. Can anyone please help me ? Here is the LINK

    If your logo is 274 pixel wide at 300DPI it will print  .9" wide.      DPI is meaningless for the web For displays and displaye drivers do not use the image file dpi setting.  Displays are run at one resolution normally  their manufactured pixel resolution.   Display these days are manufactured with resolution ranging from 96PPI to over 300PPI so your logo will display  2.8" wide on a low 96ppi resolution display and .9" wide on a high 300ppi resolution display. The the difference between Jpeg and Gif is color Jpeg supports 8Bit color so 16M colors but does not support transparency.  GIF only supports 256 mapped colors reduced to 255 colors it you want transparent empty pixels.  You can also use PGN format which supports transparency and 8 or 16 bit color.

  • Mobile version of website – not filling the screen

    I'm building a mobile version of a website and I want the site to be 221 pixels wide to fit nicely into a mobile device's screen. However, when the site is viewed from a cell phone, it comes up tiny and I have to zoom in to get it to fill the screen.
    Anyone know how to make it open zoomed in already?
    Here's a link to the site: http://www.lakesideinn.com/mobi/
    //Hanna

    This solution works great for iPhone but have noticed that it does not work for PC or Blackberry phones. The code I used to fit the page to the screen was "
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width; initial-scale=1.0; maximum-scale=1.0;">"
    but it does not work on PC or Blackberry
    ~ Scott

  • BUG: Unable to publish any photo with a width or height 800 pixels.

    My first attempts to publish a Photo page resulted in an alarmingly consistent: "Publish error: an error occurred while publishing file {filename}.jpg". These are standard .jpgs from a variety of digital cameras which I've been putting up on various photo pages using Homepage directly in .Mac, so one would think that they would work in iWeb without a hitch.
    Well.... it just doesn't work, and it stalls as soon as it hits "Uploading Photos..." before I eventually get the "Publish error" described above.
    This appeared to be file dimensions related (I was able to get a much smaller image to publish), so I investigated.
    A file that's 667 wide by 1000 high fails every time. Scale down to 334 x 500, it works. Trying some sizes in between: 534x800 works. 666x999 fails. (567x850 fails. 550x825 fails. 534x801 fails.
    So my guess is, it's looking like any picture with a dimension greater than 800 pixels on either side will fail. Let's test this.
    Stretching the image to 800x800: It works!
    Stretch it again to 801x800: It fails!
    The verdict: can't publish a photo with a width or height > 800 pixels.
    (Bug)
    Apple: please fix this....! It's possible to work around this for now, but this is totally undocumented and not very friendly...!
    David Miller

    Start by confirming here that you have the absolute latest Epson drivers from Apple:
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/firmware_hardware/epsonprinterdriver sformacosxv1061.html

  • Question on the known solution to the "Three pixel text jog" problem

    Hello,
    I'm "browser-checking" my website using Dreamweaver CS4 tool for that. I've got in various places the "three pixel text jog" IE problem. I followed the link to solution proposed by DW. It says I should add an IE conditional statement in the <head> part, so that I can define the CSS zoom property for that particular element. Hence, something like that:
    <!--[if IE]>
    <style type="text/css">
    #Content p { zoom: 1; } /* three pixel text jog IE bug */
    </style>
    <![endif]--> 
    (assuming the problem occurs for a <p> inside my #Content div.)
    My question is: can I replace this by
    <!--[if IE]>
    <style type="text/css">
    #Content * { zoom: 1; } /* three pixel text jog IE bug */
    </style>
    <![endif]--> 
    For another browser problem (prevent the browsers from using some of their own default settings), it was advised to reset the margin, padding and border properties using:
       border: 0;
       margin: 0;
       padding: 0;
    (although in my case I had to later remove border: 0; because it would prevent default buttons of forms to be displayed as buttons.)
    Does this * really mean "anything"? Is it valid as used above for fixing the three pixel text jog problem? If not, do I really have to define this zoom property for any single HTML element for which it occurs? (It currently occurs for some headers, <div>, "<div> <div>" sequence, some <p>.)
    Any comment welcome...
    Emilie
    P.S.: I tried it and DW doesn't flag that problem any more, but I'm unsure how much I can trust it.

    The behavior is unexpected. The file paths are
    correct?

  • Is there any way to go beyond the 99 TRACKS of content limitation for a DVD

    Greetings All,
    I don't think there is much hope of getting the solution to my dilemma that I'm hoping for, but perhaps someone out there has overcome a similiar situation to mine.
    As you can see from the topic of my post, I'm hoping there might be some way to get DVD SP to 'work-around' the DVD-standard of 99 tracks of content. To give you a better idea of why I'm trying to do this I'll just briefly outline my project.
    I'm creating a FAMILY TREE DVD with multiple menus (each menu representing a specific family). The object is to encompass extended family as well as ancestry up to the current generation. The names for each person that appear on the menu are links to a slideshow (and usually a very short one at that - perhaps 3 to 5 pix). As you've guessed, I've reached the limit of 99 slideshows but with barely having gone past the 1.5 GB mark.
    In order to meet the desired objective of this project, it would be preferable to have all the slideshows contained on the one DVD as this way, the interconnections between the various families can be more easily demonstrated.
    Anyway, I know its a long shot as I've tried to do some research on this myself and have come up empty.
    Any help or advice offered would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Karl

    99 title limit - this includes Tracks and Stories!
    I would imagine a project like this would be possible with chapter end jumps although ,like you guys said, it would be a PITA.
    No way to get beyond the 99 title limit in DVDSP. Tracks and stories are counted as 1 title each so the limits includes both tracks and stories. I could see having up to 99 Tracks and 99 chapters while including chapter end jumps for each slide show section. Like Aldolfo said this might put pressure on a player. Remember DVDSP is still an abstraction layer tool, hiding most of the mundane DVD details from the author.
    This title would be a breeze in a spec tool, like the studios use to author their titles. Your still limited to 99 tracks (VTS) but these tools give you access to such things as PGCs and Programs. In fact, this title could be done with 1 track(VTS) in such a tool.
    and....I wouldn't want to target 9801 separate Buttons
    Message was edited by: Eric Pautsch1

  • Photoshop CS5 can only decode fax encoded images up to 32767 pixels wide and tall

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    Can you please help me? I am scanning large drawings using an Xerox 6204 Large printer/scanner. The resolution is set at 600 and saved as .tif. Photoshop CS3 can open files with no problems, but CS5 gives me the following message:
    "Photoshop can only decode fax encoded images up to 32767 pixels wide and tall"
    I can also view with infarview and open with applications such as corel draw. Am I missing a plug-in or patch update? The same file can be opened in both Photoshop versions if I scan at resolution 300.
    Your help is greatly appreciated.
    All the best
    Paulo

    Hi Mylenium,
    Many thanks for the prompt reply.
    I agree with you... it's a little odd to save on fax tiff format... to be honest, it's not like we have an option on the matter... the XEROX 6204 Large Format Printer/Scanner either give us .Tif or .PDF options... Anyway's no problem with CS3 or other software like mentioned above... so even knowing it's a bit strange to use such format, still does not explain why on CS5 I get this error message. Furthermore if I open on CS3 and save as (same file name and same format .tif) I can then open on CS5!!!!
    To my surprise, I did not know it was saving as a fax tif... all I get is tif. Even so if all other software including an older version of Photoshop can open it why CS5 can not? What is missing? As mentioned if scanned at 300 dpi it opens... Confused. Very confused!!
    All the best
    Paulo

  • Pixel-wide distorted lines jumping around

    I admit that topic sounds confusing - but then, so is my problem:
    A few weeks ago I noticed some distorted lines on my MBP screen (first generation 15"). The appearance is as if two adjacent rows of pixels "bleed", they seem to be identical, smearing whatever is on the screen in that position out across this pixel-wide band (there are several such bands or lines, both vertical and horisontal).
    The really weird thing is, they come and go - they're mostly there and mostly in the same places (two vertical ones and three horizontal) but occasionally they disappear, then reappear, and, stranger yet, they shift about when I move the cursor to the lower right corner of the screen (at which point the entire screen seems to shift or jump slightly - one pixel? - up and to the left).
    The lower right corner is inactive, the only thing that happens when the cursor is there is that the dock pops up - but the lines don't react to the dock appearing when I put the cursor anywhere else along the bottom of the screen, only the right lower corner.
    I didn't do anything (that I'm aware of) when it first occured - no installs or re-installs, no updates, nothing like that. I haven't dropped it, stepped on it or had it run any hotter than usual, in short, no particular event or behavior caused this problem to start...
    Anyone?
    Jj
    MacBook Pro 2.0Ghz/2.0 Gb RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    I'm having the same issue. It just started this afternoon. Do you have Parallels? I was using Parallels with Windows Vista Business when it first started. I don't know if that has anything to do with it or not, but Windows was doing some weird things with screen resolution, jumping between a couple different settings by itself, just before this weirdness started. At first I thought it was Windows but then when I switched back to the Mac I noticed it was doing it there too.
    I've rebooted, and changed the screen resolution, but nothing has helped. The text looks kind of blurry unless I mouse over it and then it either gets sharper or way too sharp as if it's been through a heavy sharpening filter. Anywhere I move the mouse there's sort of a pixel-shift where the pixels look as though they're being smeared around by one pixel. Also, If I move the mouse quickly left and right the whole screen goes back and forth about a pixel.
    There are two other interesting things about this situation:
    1. I'm using a dual screen setup with my 15" MacBook Pro and a 23" Cinema Screen. It does it on both of them, and continues if I unplug the CS and only use the MBP screen.
    2. If I log in as another user, *it doesn't do it anymore* - only under my main user account does it happen, which also leads me to believe that it might have to do with Parallels. At least it would appear to be software related instead of hardware related.
    Was there anything you can think of that you did to make it stop? This is really annoying!

  • Is 720P  960 or 1280 pixels wide?

    In FCP, the Preset choices for Sequence Settings include DVCPro 720P, which turns out to be 960 pixels wide. Panasonic brags that their D2 camera (which I just shot my first footage with) is 1280 pixels wide. Then there is the Canvas "view as square pixels" choice.
    This gets real confusing real fast. (I remember something called "The Industrial Revolution", which involve STANDARDIZED interchangeable parts, which fueled American success and democracy), but that concept seems to have gone by the wayside in the Digital Era. Oh, well...)
    Can anyone explain the actual resolution of 720P and the correct "square" setting to poor me?

    I was wrong. Panasonic's HVX200 P2 camera records 720P at 960x720 pixels. The Preset in FCP for 720 P is also 960x720. I had been looking at Wikipedia's explanation of 720P, which states that it is 1280x720.
    I'm still confused about "Square Pixels," however. If I set the Viewer or Canvas to show square pixels, the image looks OK; if I set the Viewer or Canvas to not show square pixels, the image looks distorted. I would think that the pixels would have to be not-square to expand 960 to 1280, but the opposite seems to be the case.
    Can anyone explain this to me?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Jst got a iphone 4s and my itunes is not picking it up at all i have tried many things from the internet but still not working

    Please help ... Stressed new iphone user!!!!!!!!!! lol. i got a new iphone 4s on friday, people told me i needed to connect this to the itunes asap. i have had a ipod for 4 years and had no problem connecting to itunes before. at first my computer wo

  • Wake on lan

    I just purchased the MSI K7N2G-L/NFORCE2 board. I noticed it said it had WOR(wake on ring), but I didn't see a WOL (wake on lan). Is it possible to hook this up?

  • Help with a mandatory field

    There is a field on the Opportunities called 'Competitor' which is mandatory for the reps to pick from (picklist). This implies that when they create a new opportunity, they have to pick a value from this picklist. Now.. what we need is to have them

  • Decrease spacing of footnotes?

    I'm working on a document with footnotes at the bottom of the page and I'm trying to find a way to have them not be spaced out so much. Currently they're more than double-spaced and I haven't found a way to bring them closer to single-spaced. Can any

  • How to see gift card redemption purchases in iTunes

    When I pull up my account in iTunes I can't see which purchases were paid for by my iTunes card.  I got a git card and redeemed it, but it doesn't seem to be there as a credit.