What would happen if you put iOS 7 on an iPod 4th generation? Just out of curiosity.

What would happen if you put iOS 7 on an iPod 4th generation? Just out of curiosity.

It will not install you will get an error message if you try to force an install.
iOS: Restore error 3194 or 'This device isn't eligible for the requested build'

Similar Messages

  • What would happen if you connected audio out to audio in?

    the audio in/out ports on the back -- what would happen if you connected them? if i were, say, playing a youtube video and had an audio editing app open, would it record the audio? (yes, i'm aware that there are better ways to capture said audio but i'm just wondering if this is what would happen.) or would the computer explode?
    Message was edited by: MontereyMatt

    There should not be any problem with doing that. The audio output is just regular output, so it would be the same as plugging in an iPod to the audio input.
    But as you said, there are better ways to record the audio the iMac is currently playing.

  • IOS update for iPod 4th generation

    Will there be an update for iPod 4th generation? Or is Apple forcing us to buy a more recent product to get the ios7 update?

    No
    As Apple announced in June, iOS 7 is not compatible with the 4G iPod touch
    All the iOS devices compatible (iPhone 4 and later, iPad 2 and later, and 5G iPod touch) with iOS 7 have at least 512 MB of memory (RAM). The 4G iPod only has 256 MB

  • Is apple planning on real easing ios 7 to iPod 4th generation

    I want to know if apple is planning on restless in ios 7 to iPod touch 4th generation

    As Apple said in June, iOS 7 is not compatible with the 4G iPod.
    All the iOS devices compatible (iPhone 4 and later, iPad 2 and later, and 5G iPod touch) with iOS 7 have at least 512 MB of memory (RAM). The 4G iPod only has 256 MB

  • What would happen if you try to install snow leopard from disk in mac running mavericks

    I've had mavericks installed since it caem out . The longer I use it the more I want it to go away. It is th WORST piece of software apple ever put out. My opinion of course.
    To revert back to SL sounds like more tinkering than I've time for and probably also lack the necesary knowledge to do correctly.  Plus---when i installed Mavericks it destroyed most of the data in  Time Machine.
    Anyone have any solutions???

    You will need a full backup of your system from the time befor you upgraded to Mavericks. This document describes how to do it:
    OS X Mavericks: Revert to a previous OS X version
    The biggest problem will be, that all your documents and Aperture libraries by now will have been upgraded by newer application versions. Your current Aperture library will be version Aperture 3.5.1, bur Aperture 3.5.1 is incompatible with Snow Leopard. You will have to reinstall version 3.2.4. But that will not be able to open your current Aperture library and there are no tools to downgrade the Aperture library. You will lose your edits, metadata, etc. I cannot recomment to go this way.

  • What would happen if I reset settings on my iPod touch 5th gen

    I have and iPod touch 5th gen I bought it 1 month ago but I had forgot my Apple ID and I wanted to download all my music to this ipod from the one that it purchased but I had made a new Apple ID because I had forgot this one and I remembered and I logged in and it says I can't download it until 90 days pass is there anything I can do so I can do it faster cuz I need my music thanks :)x

    No, that is an anti-piracy feature
    iTunes Store: Associating a device or computer to your Apple ID

  • How can i get ios 7 in ipod 4th generation

    i have ipod touch 4th gen. it has ios 6 i want to upgrade it into ios 7

    Then get a 5G iPod.
    As Apple said in June, iOS 7 is not compatible with the 4G iPod.
    All the iOS devices compatible (iPhone 4 and later, iPad 2 and later, and 5G iPod touch) with iOS 7 have at least 512 MB of memory (RAM). The 4G iPod only has 256 MB

  • Is there a way to put DVD on my iPod 5th Generation w/out getting a ripper?

    I just got a DVD and a iPod with video. How do I get the DVD on the iPod without burning a copy or ripping it or whatever.?

    Try this:
    I had the same issue, however I used this program to transfer ...avi,mpg,wma..etc...;
    http://www.videora.com/en-us/Converter/iPod/
    If the program is used the converted files will be in a folder called;
    C:\Program Files\videoraipodConverter\vodeos
    I'm pasting this from the Videora site, the settings worked for me when others didn't, enjoy:
    Configuring videora converter
    0) Start Videora iPod converter.
    1) Click setup in the left nav.
    1.5) Click the profiles tab.
    2) Click new profile.
    3) Now, configure that profile:
    profile name: ipod
    in the video settings section...
    mode: MPEG-4 > CBR
    resolution: 320x240
    passes: one
    bitrate: 768 kbps (384 kbps also works)
    framerate: 29.97 fps
    in the audio settings section...
    bitrate: 128 kbps
    sample rate: Input
    channels: stereo
    4) Click apply to save the profile.
    Now, you're ready to transcode.
    1) Click convert on the left nav.
    2) Click the transcode new video button.
    3) Pick your source video. Mine was an AVI from a torrent.
    4) Under quality profile, choose "ipod", the profile you created using the steps above.
    5) Click start.
    Now you're ready to get the video on your ipod
    1) In iTunes, under the File menu, select add file to library. Find the transcoded one. By default, the transcoded videos pop out under the Videora install directory.
    2) Drag and drop to your ipod.
    Questions/observations:
    1) I haven't been able to get H264 anything to work. Is it broken? How much smaller than MPEG4 is it?
    2) 768 kbps video was about 400 megs/hour; 384 kbps video was about 231 megs/hour. I could readily see a difference in video quality.

  • What would happen if I...

    I left town un expectedly and didn't bring my iphone charger. My brother has an I phone but does not have the wall charger with him. What would happen if I put my iphone in his docking station while connected to his computer to charge. Would my iphone attempt to sync with his? Is there a way I could stop it from syncing. I don't want his junk and bad taste in music to be on my iphone.

    Prior to putting the phone in the cradle, go into the iTunes preferences. Under the iPhone tab there's a check box that says "Disable Automatic Syncing for all iPhones." Check that box and you'll be fine. The only way it will sync is if you tell it to.
    However, be aware that if the Computer goes into sleep mode while the iPhone is in the charger, not only will the phone not charge, but it will actually drain power.

  • Ios 7 for ipod 4th gen please!

    Dear apple i would like as many other people would to get ios 7 on ipod 4th generation. I think it would be very popular because a lot o people like me have had enough of the old version.

    No.
    All the iOS devices compatible (iPhone 4 and later, iPad 2 and later, and 5G iPod touch) with iOS 7 have at least 512 MB of memory. The 4G only has 256 MB

  • If you put iOS 7 on an iPod 4th generation would it just ruin it, of would it just not run like it should?

    If you put iOS 7 on an iPod 4th generation would it just ruin it, of would it just not run like it should?

    Same answers as your other post!!!

  • Can anyone tell me what would happen if I left the photo field blank on the Cards app on iOS?

    I like one of the letterpress designs but i'd prefer if the photo did not exist on the inside cover.
    Does anyone know what would happen if I left it blank or of any way to remove it?
    Thanks

    Try here:
    iTunes Store: My credit card's security code or zip code does not match my bank's records
    Then try contacting iTunes
    Apple - Support - iTunes - Contact Us

  • I just backed up my mac to an external hard drive using Time Machine. What would happen if I turn Time Machine off and then plug the external hard drive back into my computer?

    I just backed up my mac to an external hard drive using Time Machine. What would happen if I turn Time Machine off and then plug the external hard drive back into my computer?
    What I am ultimately wanting to do is make more room on my computer by backing up all of my files onto the external hard drive and then deleting them off of my computer. However, neededing to be able to retrieve them from the external hard drive later down the road.
    From what I have read and am trying to understand, is that I probably shouldn't have used time machine. I need to use the external hard drive like a basic flash drive where I can put things on and get things off without having it automatically update through time machine everytime I connect it to my computer.
    Not tech savvy at all and barely understand basics. I need very simple and easy to understand explanations.

    sydababy wrote:
    and then deleting them off of my computer.
    BIG BIG MISTAKE ..... youre making a linchpin deathtrap for your data trying to shove everything on a single fragile HD.
    Dont suffer the tragedy other people make, buy another or 2 more HD, theyre cheap as dust.
    The number of people who have experienced terror by having a single external HD backup is enormous.  One failure that WILL HAPPEN, and kaput,......all gone!
    Dont do it, its all about redundancy, redundancy, redundancy.
    follow here:
    Methodology to protect your data. Backups vs. Archives. Long-term data protection
    Deleting them off your computer is fine....having only ONE copy is extremely BAD.
    The Tragedy that will be, the tragedy that never should be
    Always presume correctly that your data is priceless and takes a very long time to create and often is irreplaceable. Always presume accurately that hard drives are extremely cheap, and you have no excuse not to have multiple redundant copies of your data copied on hard drives and squirreled away several places, lockboxes, safes, fireboxes, offsite and otherwise.
    Hard drives aren't prone to failure…hard drives are guaranteed to fail (the very same is true of SSD). Hard drives dont die when aged, hard drives die at any age, and peak in death when young and slowly increase in risk as they age.
    Never practice at any time for any reason the false premise and unreal sense of security in thinking your data is safe on any single external hard drive. This is never the case and has proven to be the single most common horrible tragedy of data loss that exists.
    Many 100s of millions of hours of lost work and data are lost each year due to this single common false security. This is an unnatural disaster that can avoid by making all data redundant and then redundant again. If you let a $60 additional redundant hard drive and 3 hours of copying stand between you and years of work, then you've made a fundamental mistake countless 1000s of people each year have come to regret.

  • What would happen if my mac os hard drive failed

    so i have 2 hard drives
    1 for windows bootcamp and 1 for mac
    as it is now, i boot to the windows boot manager then choose my copy of windows.
    what would happen if my mac os hard drive failed right now?
    would the computer still boot and be unaffected unless i tried to boot to mac?

    failure is usually not dead. It can be a bad sector, but usually it is a directory issue or just the partition table (but which require either quick or long format)
    if you have a workstation, you should clone both operating systems; you should not put them on the same hard drive. And you just use the clone you made for each (Paragon Clone OS for Windows $19; Carbon Copy is sharefare for OS X)
    both of those allow booting off the new hard drive while you figure what you want to do or what happened.
    If you only have two hard drives use the other drive bays.
    Basically NOTHING happens if you pull one or the other.

  • Leopard for G4 867mhz or above. What would happen on G4-400mhz?

    what would happen installing Leopard on less than a G4-867mhz?
    Would it work but be too slow for apple to be confortable supporting?
    Or do those machine lack hardware support?

    I'm not really a fan of old OS's, programs, or cobbled machines that I've built. They did the job, but I kept saving my money for better results.
    Most of the G4's, expecially the iMac's can not be upgraded with anything but ram. Your done. Some people are trying to get Leopard to run on 400 mhz G4 iMacs with their included video cards and chips on the motherboards. Now if you're talking about a tower like my Dual G4 1.42 Ghz then you're right, I've already added all of the hardware I wanted, including the ram, video, USB2, bluetooth and gigabit ethernet. But I started with a very capable machine that was worth upgrading. The limit here is the speed of the motherboard bus, and the slower G4's should be just put out as a Tiger game machines and save your upgrade money for a new iMac. I've moved the old machine into a back office to run Leopard server, and got the wind tunnel out of my workspace. When the ATI 9800 pro video card bit the dust because of a fan failure, I just put the original card back in and don't need the high end video on a headless server.
    The upgrades I did were to keep my production machine up to speed for a couple of extra years, but those years are long past, and my MBP and iMac's run rings around it for less money. Every Mac I ever bought before the Intel Mac's cost $3000 plus upgrades. These new $1100 to $1400 machines blow them away. I played with drop-in CPU's from Newer Technology in the past (they only cost 3 or 4 hundred), and they worked for a short time, but invariably I needed to run special patches from the vendor to be able to even install the later OS's.
    I'm not sure what you mean when you say you didn't touch the hardware at all. It seems like you changed everything that wasn't soldered to the motherboard (except the CPU and maybe ethernet). It sounds like you've been able to buy your way up to it's present level, piecemeal. OK. The fact that you got an older machine to run faster than it did has nothing to do with how fast or reliable a machine made in the last 3 or 4 years will run, natively, supported by Apple with all updates and drivers, video improvements, built-in camera's, etc. All of the improvements you made, and much more are already available with much higher performance on the new iMac's. There are so many people who believe that Leopard will speed up their computers just by installing the OS. They should have just stayed with Tiger and got Leopard with their new machine, just like the millions of Vista users who expected speed for nothing.
    WinXP will run on an early slow 486 processor. You'll save a lot of money if you do it. What's the point? I don't buy computers based on how little I have to spend to get work done (that's the PC mentality that drives me nuts as I wait for the machine and the hour glass to get back to me). I buy them based on how much work I can get done. When a program's developers decide not to upgrade or patch their program for the new OS or architecture I bid them a fond farewell and move to a company who makes products that perform well with my new machines. These machines and existing programs do not improve with age and developers who want to sit on their laurels and reap income from old work just seem to fade away. Adobe and MS are doing their best to write better code, as are thousands of independent programmers.
    It's time for Snow Leopard to re-establish MacOS as a performance OS Leopard is only marginally better than Tiger even on Intel CPU's due to being dumbed down and bloated with legacy code. Losing the PPC processor and compatibility code will improve MacOS measurably.
    Programs that won't run on SL, and machines that can't run it need to go away (make it into a fax server or contact management work station or something useful). As long as I can get to the machine on the network, it has value, just not for production.
    Sorry, just wrote another chapter

Maybe you are looking for