Where we r customizing for Payroll Checks

Hi,
I made changes to the Program assigned to F110(Automatic Payment Run). I want make sure that these changes not effected the Payroll Checks. can anyone guide me where we are assigning the Program and Layout for the Payroll Checks. I want to give the Technical Details about this to My Manager. I know these changes won't effect to the Payroll Checks.
Please Guide me.
Regards,
Nagesh.

Hi Nagesh,
What program did you change? for Payroll checks, the Program used is RFFOUS_C and the Custom Layout set if any is assigned on the selection screen under 'Output Control'.. otherwise ist is the std F110_PRENUM_CHK. More often than not we will be using custom layout sets...
Regards,
Suresh Datti

Similar Messages

Changing the print order for payroll checks and payroll deposit advices

Hello,
How do you change the print order of payroll checks and deposit advices?
Thanks
RW

Hi there crazytalk,
Could you provide the community with a little more information to help narrow troubleshooting? What operating system are you using and what program are we printing from?
You can say thanks by clicking the Kudos Star in my post. If my post resolves your problem, please mark it as Accepted Solution so others can benefit too.

Customer for Intercompany Billing

Hi
Where is the customer for Intercompany Billing copied from?
I have a Purchase Order - Ordering Plant A in Company Code 1. Material is ordered from Plant B in Company Code 2.
In delivering plant B we create Delivery against a Purchase Order.
Than we Create Invoice via VF01 against a delivery?
I am wondering how customer and partner functions are copied into the billing document.
Thanks
Mairusz

Hello Ivano
Thanks. I have following case:
Devliery should be done to Customer 1050. This is the one assigned to plant in customing "Define Shipping Data for Plants".
But I want billing to be done against customer 1000.
I have set Partner Functions for customer 1050 as follows:
SP     Sold-to party     1000
BP     Bill-to party     1000
PY     Payer     1000
But every time in the billing document Sold-to Party = 1050.
Can you advice why? How should I set it correctly.
Thanks
Mariusz

Automatic release of customer order block for credit check

Dear expert,
Please i need your input on this, we have a scenario where third party customer order is automatically block for credit check at sales order. Now i want that after posting customer payment the sales order should be automatically release if the customer balance covers the value of goods required no need to manually release in VKM1. Is this possible is as per SAP? IF yes how can i do the settings
thanks in advance

yes u can do it in vkm1 is right but you can also do in credit management screen if ur fully controlled in credit management then u can go to abaper help
if it is wrong plz suggest

35+ minute runtime for the program PAY004 Payroll Check Register

Hi There,
I hope you are doing fine day.
We need your urgent help.
We are on Peoplesoft HRMS Application Release 8.80 SP1 and PeopleTools 8.44. We use North America payroll for all our employees in North America.
We are experiencing 35+ minute runtime for the program PAY004 Payroll Check Register. This happens when user selects run id which is assigned to all companies, paygroup for the month of June 2008. It looks that the program PAY004 is picking up wrong index PSEPAY_CHECK for the record PAY_CHECK. When we force the program PAY004 via Oracle hint /*+ index(P1 PS0PAY_CHECK) */ then the program runs under 3 minutes.
Questions for you:
1. What is causing the above wrong index to the picked for the record PAY_CHECK in the program PAY004?
2. Where do we specify the default index for a record in Peoplesoft?
3. Is adding the hint the best solution?
Please reply ASAP.
Thanks in advance.
Have a nice day and great week.
Regards.
Ashish Bhatt.
716 858 5223

Thanks a lot.
HASPJava.dll is used by verification License and is invoked less and can't use a lot of native memory.
Our business is communicating between java and COM component. In order to implement it, we used JavaCom to generate java class for COM component.
Memory of COM component is little, but Native Memory is high.
Who used JavaCom and did you meet this problem?
Please give me some suggestions. Thanks a lot.

Error for customer specific Authorization check (User Exit)

Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem in PM.
I have created a maintenace plan for calibration via t code IP42 and mentioned the order type PM05. Scheduling is done for the order. I got the order number.
I have released the order and got the inspection lot number.
While entering the results recording through t code QE17, the reluts are out of the specified range, i have given the valuation Rejected, immediately system is giving an error message as below:
"Error for customer specific Authorization check (User Exit)"
Though there is no user exit activated in the system, this message is coming and not allowing the result recoring for rejection.
If I'm entering the result recording within the specified range, then valuation is Accepted and its allowing to save.
I have checked the following user exits:
QQMA0002: QM: Authorization Check for Entry into Notif. Transaction
QQMA0026: PM/SM: Auth. check when accessing notification transaction.
The above 2 User Exits are not active.
I have also checked a note 429066. But it says incase of any dump for that user exit only its applicable and more over the current version of the system is ECC 6.0 packae 15, where as that note is applicable upto 4.6C.
Please some one help me on this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Praveen.

Dear Pete,
I have cheked with my technical team, There is no hotpacks updated recently. This is the implementaion project I'm in, so performing the cycle for the first time.
Any how I got it solved, in T code QE17, after entering the Inspection lot in next screen goto menu path Settings - User settings - Defects recording mention the reprt type and tick on Reprt type Changable.
At the time of result recording if the valuation is Rejected then it ask for defects recording close that window if not rwequired then save, the error message no longer apperaing now.
Regards,
Praveen

An out-of-sequence check is not permitted for payroll type B

We had to do advance payments for 4 pay periods for an employee through offcycle workbench. One of the checks was wrong so we had to reverse it. It is an out of sequence reversal. Now when i try to do a correction run , it gives me an error An out-of-sequence check is not permitted for payroll type B
How can i run the correction run now. Please help
Edited by: sagarika sharma on Aug 14, 2010 6:29 AM

Check with SAP note 1425764,696067 and 1127119.
Mohan

Customer refund paid using F110 for which check is not generated

Hi,
A customer refund is paid using the transaction F110. Payment document got generated and successfully posted. But the check number is not allotted for that document and checks are not printed. In the same payment run payment is made to the vendors for which checks got generated. I had checked customer master data and payment method settings and not able to figure out what is the exact reason.
Please respond
Regards
Srinivas

Hi,
System thinks Check should be issued to vendors and collected from customer so check creation refer to the field LFA1-LIFNR, name written here is used for Check creation. Does customer name lie in to LFA1-LIFNR. This is the reason check issued for customer is not created. If you want then get the check printing form analyzed by an ABAPer to modify, if any.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Custom program for availability check and update for existing sale order at Item level(VA02)

Hi,
I came to know Bapi_Saleorder_Simulate can be used for availability check and update an existing sale order.but there is no sample program explaining the process.I have tried this by passing parameters ORDER_HEADER_IN , ORDER_ITEMS_IN ,ORDER_PARTNERS and ORDER_SCHEDULE_EX(for getting details),also i have assigned the sale document number ,custom document type(ZSO) in ORDER_HEADER_IN . while executing the BAPI I am getting the error external number range is not assigned for the document type ZSO . I am confused on seeing this error. It is possible to do availability check for existing sale order using this BAPI. Please explain how to achieve this.It will be really helpful if it is expalained with an example.
Regards,
Shanmuga

Hello, I think you may have been misinformed about this BAPI updating a sales order at item level. As far as I understand it this BAPI can be used to simulate the creation of a sales order which obviously would include and ATP check. This is why it is giving the error because it is simulating creation but you are entering a value in a field that should be automatically generated (i.e. the sales order number). For change the sales order at item level have you looked at BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE? I pretty sure this BAPI both updates sales order (header or item level) and can do an ATP first.
Points are always welcome if you feel an answer has been helpful.

Where is the custom stamp location in Acrobat 9 Pro for Win Vista

Where is the custom stamp location in Acrobat 9 Pro for Win Vista?

See this thread to find out how to determine the location:
http://acrobatusers.com/forums/aucbb/viewtopic.php?id=17521

Looking For Recommendation - Software/Service to Print Payroll Checks

My company is looking to replace our payroll check printing software. The vendor no longer exists and 3rd party support is troublesome. Can anyone recommend a good vendor, with or without online features? We are using Oracle 11i HRMS, and don't have plans to move to a newer version any time soon. Any suggestions, leads, or testimonials would be greatly appreciated.

Hello!
Thank you for using MOS Communities! I will move your question to the Oracle HRMS community for targeted assistance.
Have a great day,
Danielle

Java BAdI implementation for Customer specific Spell check

In IS-M/AMC, I am working on implementation of a Java BAdI, namely ICustSpellCheck, which enables Customer Specific Spell check instead of the standard MS-Word spell check. Could someone provide pointers on the java code that goes into different methods of this class?

Hi Dharmendra,
Check if this is your case..
Note
This Business Add-In is not suitable for checking individual field content in an installed base, or installed base component: To do this, see Business Add-In: Additional Checks When Modifying Installed Base Headers and Business Add-In: Additional Checks When Modifying Components.
Regards.
Manuel

Where to seek custom service for man-made damage to my T420

Hello,
I have recently dripple a few water drops to the touchboard area of my T420 when I was running it. Although I managed to shut it down normally after a few minutes without seeing a blackscreen or sudden crash of the system and I had poured a few water drops out from the computer right after the accident, I could not start it again any more. I know it is a man-made damage to the mainboard and this is usually costly without an extended warranty. So I am wondering where to seek custom service or private service to get my laptop fixed? Any suggestions for what I can do right now? I am in the west suburban of the Greater Chicago arae. Thanks!

Hi and welcome,
Sorry to hear about that accident. You can find a service provider using this tool: Find Service Provider or Service Center (full disclosure: I haven't tried it).
Was it just water? How long ago did this happen? There's at least a chance that once it has dried out the machine will be OK. A chance...
If you're comfortable doing this remove the battery, the keyborad, palm rest, HD, anything that isn't glued down, and let things dry thoroughly.
[edit] Hardware maintenance manual: ThinkPad T420 - Hardware Maintenance Manual
Z.
The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc. The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Question on Third Party Payroll Check in XML Publisher

Hi:
I have created an XML Third Party Check report that is based on the queries found in the seeded Oracle PAYUSGAR.rdf 115.24 check report. The patch 9211869 fixed an issue in the standard report where multiple checks for the same employee to the same payee for the same amount were NOT printing the correct garnishment reference number. I have reviewed the report code but have not been able to fix this same issue through XML.
My queries will produce all of the correct data except the 2nd duplicate (same employee to the same payee for the same amount) prints the reference number from the 1st element rather than the 2nd. Does anyone know how the check data is tied to the elements through the tables?
My example is:
Person: Max Doe Check: 1234 Paid to: California Agency Check Amount: 121.00 Pre_payment_id: 766297 Ref # 4567
Person: Max Doe Check: 1234 Paid to: California Agency Check Amount: 121.00 Pre_payment_id: 766302 Ref # 657AA
(Ref # 657AA prints on the second check as Ref # 4567)
The query from the report is:
SELECT peev.screen_entry_value garn_ref_no
,:check_amount
,TO_CHAR(pay_us_payment_pkg.get_trx_date(
:business_group_id,
:ppa_payroll_action_id,
NULL,
:ppa_payroll_id,
:ppa_consolidation_set_id,
:ppa_org_payment_method_id,
:ppa_effective_date,
:ppa_date_earned,
:ppa_override_date,
ppp.pre_payment_id,
ppa.effective_date
),'DD-MON-YYYY') payment_date
,TO_CHAR(ppa.date_earned, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
,prr_att.run_result_id
,peef.entry_information2 -- FIPS code
,peef.entry_information3 -- Medical Indicator
,paa.assignment_action_id
,pet.element_type_id
FROM pay_element_entry_values_f peev,
pay_input_values_f piv_att,
pay_element_entries_f peef,
pay_run_results prr_att,
pay_run_results prr_pay,
pay_payroll_actions ppa,
pay_assignment_actions paa,
pay_action_interlocks pai,
pay_pre_payments ppp,
pay_input_values_f piv_pay,
pay_run_result_values prrv_att,
pay_run_result_values prrv_pay,
pay_element_types_f pet,
pay_element_types_f pet_calc,
pay_element_classifications pec
WHERE ROUND(ppp.VALUE ,2) = :check_amount
AND ppp.pre_payment_id = :pre_payment_id
AND ppp.assignment_action_id = pai.locking_action_id
AND pai.locked_action_id = paa.assignment_action_id
AND ppa.payroll_action_id = paa.payroll_action_id
AND ppa.action_type IN ('R', 'Q')
AND ((paa.source_action_id IS NOT NULL AND ppa.run_type_id IS NOT NULL) OR
(paa.source_action_id IS NULL AND ppa.run_type_id IS NULL))
AND ppp.personal_payment_method_id = peef.personal_payment_method_id
AND peef.assignment_id = paa.assignment_id
AND ppa.date_earned BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date
AND peev.effective_end_date
AND ppa.date_earned BETWEEN peef.effective_start_date
AND peef.effective_end_date
AND piv_att.input_value_id = peev.input_value_id
AND UPPER(piv_att.NAME) = 'ATTACHMENT NUMBER'
AND ppa.effective_Date BETWEEN piv_att.effective_start_date
AND piv_att.effective_end_date
AND piv_att.input_value_id = prrv_att.input_value_id
AND prrv_att.result_value = peev.screen_entry_value
AND prrv_att.run_result_id = prr_att.run_result_id
AND paa.assignment_Action_id = prr_att.assignment_Action_id
AND prr_att.element_type_id = peef.element_type_id
AND peef.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id
AND pet.classification_id = pec.classification_id
AND pec.classification_name = 'Involuntary Deductions'
AND pec.legislation_code = 'US'
AND pec.business_group_id IS NULL
AND fnd_number.canonical_to_number(pet.element_information5) = pet_calc.element_type_id
AND pet_calc.element_name LIKE pet.element_name || '%Calculator'
AND pet_calc.element_type_id = piv_pay.element_type_id
AND NVL(ppa.date_earned, ppa.effective_date) BETWEEN piv_pay.effective_start_date AND piv_pay.effective_end_date
AND piv_pay.input_value_id = prrv_pay.input_value_id
AND UPPER(piv_pay.NAME) = 'PAY VALUE'
AND fnd_number.number_to_canonical(ppp.VALUE) = prrv_pay.result_value
AND prr_pay.run_result_id = prrv_pay.run_result_id
AND prr_pay.assignment_action_id = paa.assignment_action_id
AND prr_pay.element_type_id = pet_calc.element_type_id
ORDER BY prr_att.run_result_id;
Somehow, Oracle has fixed this in the rdf but I have not been able to figure out how exactly. This is a function call in the report but they are passing the check amount and the prepayment_id. Regardless of which pre_payment_id is sent in, 2 rows are returned.
If anyone has any thoughts, please let me know. This is the final tweak that is stopping our go-live with this.
Thanks, RL

In bug 6779249 it states that third party checks are not supported for XML...
But, as we have bought into the push to convert we now are down to payroll checks and third party checks to get our company off of Optio once and for all...
Other than attempting to write a complete custom process from scratch (just to throw out next year when we upgrade to 12) does anyone have any solutions to getting 3rd party checks to print with BIP in Oracle Applications (11.5.10)?
Scott

Report for payroll results

Hi all,
I want the report where i have the fields as employee Id, employee name, bank account number and amount transferred to the bank for a particular month.
If I try from Infoset Query, I can take the first three fields from the respective Infotypes. But I am unable to find the amount transferred to the bank (/559 Wage type value) in any infotype. Nor I am able to fill the 042 or 043 IT from report RPABRI00.
How to get the report?
Please revert
Regards
Deepti

Hi,
Check this thread .
Payroll reports.
If you want RT data,you cannot do it through Query.You can do it through customized program.
Check standard Reports as well
Eg.S_AHR_61016101 - Remuneration Statements
S_AHR_61016102 - Payroll Accounts
S_PH9_46000156 - Bank Details
S_AHR_61016170 - Payments and Deductions
You cand this reports in Info system under your country payroll.
Manoj.

Where we r customizing for Payroll Checks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for