Why 2 Forums for HR?

SAP ERP Human Capital Management (SAP ERP HCM)
~Suresh

Hi Suresh,
Actually craig is correct but unfortunately nobody is using it for ICC purpose that forum seems to Question Answer forum in which every one is asking very basic question of HR which they are getting at the time of learning stage.
Manoj Shakya.

Similar Messages

Why no individual forums for common applications?

On the main Discussions page there's a forum for each OS version, and under "Applications" there's AppleWorks(!)—discontinued, iChat (is this still in distribution with new OS's?), and iCal. But none for Mail, iWork or iLife apps. Many apps span all versions of OS's. Why are there not individual forums for these?

There are bunches of "Mavericks" users that use Apple Mail.App - if you are a [INSERT OS X HERE)
Mavericks user too, you are then in the right place for help
And what about all those other Mail users (under other versions of OS X)? They have many many problems that span all versions. I won't hear from them and read their answers, maybe the solution to my problem. Indeed, lots of discussions will probably be duplicated, needlessly.
I, too will leave it here.

Why isn't there a TechNet forum for ADFS yet? They have been forwarding questions to the "Project Geneva" forum for years now.

Why isn't there a TechNet forum for ADFS yet? They have been forwarding questions to the "Project Geneva" forum for years now.
It would be nice if there was IT Pro specific forum. The MSDN Geneva forum has people who have programming questions for WIF in addition to people trying to get ADFS and Web App Proxy setup.
WHY?

Given the growing importance of Office 365 and the role of ADFS in some of the larger deployments, that may happen. Someday.
It is somewhat arbitrary.
AD DS, AD CS, AD FS, and AD RMS are all considered components of Active Directory.
I suppose that's what the AD stands for...
Yet, most ADCS questions are posted and answered in the Technet Security forum.
ADFS questions are often referred to Project Geneva.
Directory Services has its own forum.
Group Policy has its own forum.
+++
If you look in "related threads", someone asked a question precisely about ADCS:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/f6abf662-7927-4f72-91db-433c95eddcc8/why-isnt-there-a-forum-dedicated-to-certificate-services?forum=winserversecurity
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

I don't want to submit a #@$%^& question! I just want to search the forum for answered questions.

I don't want to submit a #@$%^& question!
I just want to search the forum for answered questions.
Why is Apple such a freaking control freak?
Hey Apple—quit fixing s**t that isn't broken!

You could use google. If you want to only search these discussions forums use the following syntax in a google search:
whatever you are searching for site:discussions.apple.com
Update:
Why is this questio/discussion in Cinema Displays when it should have been in Using Apple Support Communities?

Looking for forums for Sony digital video camera recorder DCR-TRV 11

I've been thinking hard and decided that I WILL use my Sony digital video camera recorder DCR-TRV 11. (I was being tempted by a smaller Sony that has a 40x optical zoom.
Question: Do you know of where I can find a good forum for this brand and model? I Googled it but would like personal recommendations.
Thank you.
-L

Bengt Wärleby wrote:
Hi
Don't know of any other forum else this (and FinalCut)
Your Camera NEED an FireWire-Cable FW-800 <--> 4-pin or FW-400 <--> 4-pin
I have a FireWire cable.
The supplied USB-Cable will not work with iMovie or FinalCut - Sorry.
Yours Camera also can record Audio as 12-bit or 16-bit Audio.
Please - SET IT TO 16-bit (now) - else severe audio sync problems in iMovie
(FinalCut - might be able to Capture 32kHz audio)
How do I set my Sony digital video camera recorder DCR-TRV 11 to 16-bit?
Also, I do not have or use Final Cut.
Thank you for the warning about 16 bit. I wish you would tell me why it is important to set to 16 bit, though.
Thank you,
-L
Yours Bengt W
Don't know of any other forum else this (and FinalCut)
Your Camera NEED an FireWire-Cable FW-800 <--> 4-pin or FW-400 <--> 4-pin
The supplied USB-Cable will not work with iMovie or FinalCut - Sorry.
Yours Camera also can record Audio as 12-bit or 16-bit Audio.
Please - SET IT TO 16-bit (now) - else severe audio sync problems in iMovie
(FinalCut - might be able to Capture 32kHz audio)

Best Forum for Software Update Installation Installation

What is the (better or best) forum for discussing problems involving the failure to install Microsoft updates (for IE 11, .NET Framework 3.5.1, and Windows 7)? (Not sure why I am getting security updates for .NET Framework 3.5.1 when I have 4.5.1 installed
according to "programs and features" but....)

I'd probably ask them over here.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_update?sort=lastreplydate&dir=desc&tab=Threads&status=&mod=&modAge=&advFil=&postedAfter=&postedBefore=&threadType=All&tm=1394236366347'
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

Open source / Commercial version, it's up to you! Why not for ESB products

Please comment this forum and help us to get Sun's support for Open ESB as we can get it for open-Solaris or Glassfish.
Thanks
Paul
Extract from
http://www.pymma.com/eng/People/Blog-Paul-Perez-Chief-Architect
Jonathan Schwartz new policy
Few years ago, Jonathan Schwartz replaced Scott McNealy as SUN Microsystems CEO. Swartz's first decision was to convert Sun into an Open-Source company. Consequently, Solaris OS, Application Servers and even the Java language were opened and their sources published. At present, Sun is viewed as a major Open Source actor.
Sun�s new sales philosophy proposes, on one hand, its best products in an open-source format and on the other hand, commercial support and hardware. The best examples of this new philosophy are Open-Solaris and Glassfish. You can download these products, use them and test them. After you have built applications with these tools and wish to move into a production environment, you can buy support from Sun.
Open source or Commercial version, it's up to you!
Alternatively, you can as well buy commercial versions at the first place. Even if open sources and commercial versions are slightly different than the open-source ones, more than 95% of their code is originated from the same development branch. Example : SUN proposes its queue messaging system with two similar versions, respectively named �SUN QM� and "Open-MQ". The only difference is the amount you pay for the technical support.
Everyone can find advantages in this sales policy on Sun products: companies and developers try and develop for free and can rely on Sun support in production. As a matter of fact, Sun uses these �free� products as Trojan horses to conquer new market shares, penetrate new companies and sell Sun hardware.
Why not for ESB Products ?
Unfortunately, there is a small issue in this picture: Sun's ESB platform is the exception in this sales policy. In Fact, Sun proposes two different tools for ESB developments. The first product. "JCAPS", is a commercial product inherited from Seebeyond. The second product, "Open-ESB" is based on JBI specifications (JSR 208) and was developed from scratch about 2 years ago.
Alas, JCAPs and Open-ESB are definitely two different products.
JCAPS ignores JBI specifications
JCAPS connectors are based on JCA specifications and not on JBI.
Open-ESB development process is based on Web services specifications, JCAPS not.
JCAPS and Open-ESB developments are not compatible.
Hundreds other differences can be found between the two products.
We can understand that for a while, for technical, marketing or business reasons, a company supports more than one product lines with the same functionalities. IBM does it and Oracle buying BEA will do it also.
However, there are several things that Pymma would like to understand:
Why the download of JCAPS is only available for authorized JCAPS Partner ?
Why SUN does not provide support for open-ESB as it does for Glassfish, Open Solaris or Open MQ ?
Why JBI or Open-ESB are never mentioned at most ESB seminars organized by Sun Centres in the UK ?
Why Sun marketing, Gurus or consultants are prolix about JBI in the public lectures and technical forums, and at the same ignore Open-ESB when they advice companies ?
Is the policy of Jonathan Swartz policy only applicable for Java Legacy applications (Application Server, Message queuing�)? not for ESB tools ?
Of course, we already asked these questions to SUN but we never got clear answers.
Thanks for clarifying Sun's position
Many companies believe in JBI and their developers spend time and energy working on Open-ESB . These companies would certainly be interested to hear Sun's explanations on the above questions. They probably want to be sure that Open-ESB will not be just a prototype for the new JCAP version (only reserved for SUN JCAPS Partners). They certainly want to be credible by proposing SUN's professional support on Open-ESB as they do for Glassfish and Open-Solaris. After, they only need from SUN to clarify its position and give a clear prospective for the future of JBI and Open-ESB. We hope that through this blog Sun will hear us and we will give us clear answers.

Hi Leonie,
My iPhoto is iPhoto 11, version 9.4.2. I believe my Aperture is the latest version but I don't know how to verify that when I can't open it. I regularly accept any updates.
How I restored my Aperture Library: I opened Aperture, clicked on Time Machine, and navigated to the Aperture Library that had been backed-up earlier in the day. It took a while to restore.
When done, I opened Aperture (yes, at that point I could still open it). It opened up on the still-empty Library, and I had to manually change it to the restored library, every time I opened aperture after that. This was annoying, so, I then went to FINDER and deleted the empty Library. I probably shouldn't have done this; I noticed it had the words "current default" in its filename.
From that point on, FINDER shows the restored aperture library (actually two restored aperture libraries, since I accessed Time Machine a second time to restore an even older backed-up version) but of course, not the empty Library that had had "default" in its filename. And... I can no longer open Aperture.
Hope you can help me, thanks so much,
Glensdaughter

Forum for discussions around "My Oracle Support"

Since there isn't a forum specifically for "My Oracle Support" what do people think about having one created.
There are forums both here and in the MOS communities for just about every other product that Oracle has what about one for MOS on http://forums.oracle.com?
Any value in it?

Pointless wrote:
Hans Forbrich wrote:
user10158586 wrote:
If having it out in the open didn't get complaints noticed, why would they care?I don't think anyone (except possibly Oracle's support group) is arguing against getting this stuff into the open.
The question (at least in my little mind) is "Why do people think that Oracle should provide the forum to air Oracle's laundry?"Possibly because it would encourage them to provide a better service to paying support customers and listen to what they need and that that would ultimately be beneficial to Oracle?
When Oracle do not provide a public forum for Oracle users to discuss their experiences and lock threads when people do discuss their experiences tends to suggest that, yes they notice the discussions on this site and that they do not want those experiences to become public, because in general they are not positive experiences.What makes you think Oracle Support will listen here? They feel they have an appropriate forum.
>
I think in the long run Oracle's stance on the support upgrade and their efforts to keep it quiet will only hurt Oracle.I agree.
But then again, perhaps they believe they provided us with appropriate opportunity to provide feedback.
Indeed, they have held several public forums asking for feedback (in particular for input on how to design the new Certify system), some of which I advertised for them, AND NO ONE CAME. There were dozens of excuses provided when I contacted individuals to encourage participation.
If they provide facilities and resources and we ignore them, why should they (MOS) make any effort to come to a location that they have told us they do not officially monitor.
Indeed, we have been told several times that MOS/MOS-C and Forums are separate. And the moderator here is trying very hard to keep them separate as well.
>
What is worrying is we have seen a similar attitude during the various forums upgrades where useful features are continually removed and features no one wants are added and scalability goes down. It begins to look like an institutionalized attitude of not listening.Bi-directional. There is truly a mutual attitude of not listening.
For example - you claim 'no one wants those features'. Yet, those features were, and are, wanted by some - specifically by the Applications community that is not at all well represented in OTN Forums.
(How they are implemented, and whether Flash is a usable technology for this ... is another discussion entirely. Let's just say I am on record as an early advocate of http://supporthtml.oracle.com)

Where does one find the Very Useful tool, Magic Wand, in the latest version of Photoshop, anyone? Its been well hidden. Why change for change's sake?

Where does one find the Very Useful tool, Magic Wand, in the latest version of Photoshop, anyone? Its been well hidden. Why change for change's sake?

csuebele wrote:
I guess I'm too slow, Trevor.
That's no bad thing Chuck. It indicates that you have better things to do than constantly refresh the forum LOL.
I'm having a wee posting spree today after lacking the inclination to respond to the same old threads for the last few days. But I do love it when people get all in a tizzy complaining about stuff that is right under their nose (so to speak). So I guess my criteria for responding is often based as much on how big a smile it puts on my face, as to how much I am helping the OP. Unfortunately that irreverent approach gets me into trouble at times, and one of the moderators deleted one of my illustrated replies just a few days ago. It took me a few minutes to work out why it had been deleted. The subtext was 'risking one eye', and I eventually realized that the implied 'risk' could definitely be seen as offensive to some people.

Need a forum for Visual Voice Mail (VVM)

This Community forum thing is great. We can post our thoughts and get to know what others are thinking. I wonder why there is no forum on "Visual Voice Mail (VVM)". I can see forums on My Verizon or Messaging under Wireless. Why not for Visual Voice Mail? On Android Market or Crackberry, I can see hundreds and thousands of feedback on Visual Voicemail. Why not give us a chance to talk about VVM here? It'd help Verizon Wireless a lot. We can also get many of our questions answered. It'll be a great self-support forum benefitting both customers like me as well as Verizon.
Don't you think so?
A heavy VVM user

At this time, we're keeping discussion of the VVM in the Wireless Features - Other board until there's enough interest and discussion to warrant it's own forum.
Thanks for the suggestion, though. We'll certainly be watching to see how much interest there is.
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer that solved your issue as the accepted solution.

No forum for the Maxx?

I assume this is the correct forum for the Razr Maxx? I assumed I'd see a separate forum.
Thanks
Stephen

Keep us posted...
Well, I've had so much misinformation and receipts from the Original Verizon store, that when I attempted return/exchange items at 2nd store (closer to work than home), that the second Verizon store couldn't make heads or tales of what was going on with my accessories and the receipts that I presented to them. They encouraged me to return to the 1st store... because apparently the correct item for my MAXX showed on my receipt, but the item I was given was not matching up. *SIGH*
In a nutshell, yes, They sold me the incorrect Car Mount, per the picture provided by B33, it was missing the "MAXX" name on the box... I think my sales rep was a bit confused. Sadly, you'd think they'd get that right at the store when you are purchasing all the items at one time, with a new phone.
The Vehicle Navigation Dock was returned, as my wife is not going to want to de-case her Maxx every time she get's in the car and wants to put it in that mount. I opted for the 'generic' vent mount that is similar to a generic cigarette mounted mount that i use in my car.
Item I use: powerMOUNT - Power Socket Mount for Portable Devices
http://www.scosche.com/consumer-tech/product/2081
Item purchased at the Verizon Store for a vent mount solution: Vent/Adhesive Combo Mount
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/accessory?action=accessoryDetails&archetypeId=10150&accessoryId=41242&initialPhoneId=5844
I've not pulled the Vent/Adhesive Combo Mount out of the box yet, so no comments on it yet.
As for the HD Dock.. I got it home... it fits only with the phone out of the case. From what I see,it's not going to fit with any case on the MAXX. I was not willing to remove my case every time I wanted to use the DOCK.
Then... I didn't see what the HD Dock was going to do for me.... what value would it provide, sure, I can put my screen on my large HD TV... buy scrolling around the screen using the Maxx's touchscreen was not a pleasant experience. Did not see why I would want or need to do so. (I can use the HDMI cable I purchased for use with that dock, to go directly to the TV if I ever need to...)

Moderator q? - re searching forum for 'XMLParserV2' - results not found

Didn't know where else to post this so delete the thread if not appropriate here.
Why can't this thread be found by searching the forum for 'xmlparser', 'XMLParserv2' or any other combination that should find it?
Error with XMLParserV2.jar and LocaleMapper
This is the title
>
Error with XMLParserV2.jar and LocaleMapper
>
And there are several references in the thread to that jar file.
A search for 'xmlparser' won't even find this thread I just posted and it mentions that word several times.
There have been other times when I can't find threads I know I have replied to but this example is so clear cut I can't understand if it is me or something about the search mechanism behind the forum software.
If this is really a bug how do I report it?

jgarry wrote:
Check out the other thread he posted. At first I thought he had a legitimate complaint about rp, but then I realized rp called it spot-on in his first reply.Joel,
+1 (this is that thread right?)
Which exam has higher value?
Regards
Aman....

Forum for Support or N

Hi,
Right, if this forum is not for support purposes, then I ask Creative, why is this forum and the link under the Support section of the Creative site?
Perhaps this should be moved as it is misleading people into thinking they can get support here. And also, what sort of a company is it, that provides a forum, and does not allow customers to express their feeling upon how that company manages its aspect of products and after sales service, ie: techinical support.
Many companies are open to feedback, yet Creative seem not to have any staff on the forums, who can actually make a difference to any of the problems a customer may or may not have.
For example, many companies would have some sort of support representati've in the forums, if only to keep up appearances, and perhaps make a odd post on one or two topics a day. Now that can't really be too much to ask can it's
Thanks, Andrew Robinson.

andyr2005 wrote:
Hi,
Right, if this forum is not for support purposes, then I ask Creative, why is this forum and the link under the Support section of the Creative site?
Perhaps this should be moved as it is misleading people into thinking they can get support here.
We don't mislead people. At the top of every single forum page it says clearly "Discussion Forums" not "Support Forums." All the main forum pages have that red disclaimer. And if I recall correctly, when you sign up for the forums at one point it takes you to a blank screen that has the disclaimer on it, explaining these are not support forums, but user interaction forums. Do you have a specific suggestion to make it less misleading? It's only under the support section on the main website so people can find it when looking for answers. Users often find answers to their problems here without ever having to send an email. So naturally it'd be under the "support" link where people would look for answers to their problems. The numerous warnings the rest of the way to and in the forums should give it away that it's still just a discussion forum, where people can discuss their problems.
And also, what sort of a company is it, that provides a forum, and does not allow customers to express their feeling upon how that company manages its aspect of products and after sales service, ie: techinical support.
Many companies are open to feedback, yet Creative seem not to have any staff on the forums, who can actually make a difference to any of the problems a customer may or may not have.
We are open to feedback, we do generally allow customers to express their feelings about it. If we didn't, there wouldn't really be so many angry posts here, because they would all be deleted right? We have to start locking threads when they turn into flame wars, people start cursing, attacking each other or CL, etc. We only allow CIVIL posts, as outlined in the forum Rules, which you agreed to when you signed up for this forum. And we do pass on your feedback to the appropriate channels. We aren't in charge of actually implementing any ideas, but we do get the feedback to them. And more often than you see, those ideas do get implemented. For example there has been requests in the sound forum for a PCI-Express sound card. I recall seeing Creative showing off a new PCI-Express card recently.
If anyone has a CIVIL comment to make, I'll leave this thread open. But any attacks, threats, cursing etc, and it's locked. We've stated what this forum is in place for, if you have a suggestion to change the forum please feel free to PM a forum moderator or contact Customer Support.
Dale

HT204053 When I initially try to sign in to iCloud, I get the "Account not verified" screen and I am told to check my email for instructions to verify. No email is ever sent. My ID and password work on all other Apple app's. Why not for iCloud?

When I initially try to sign in to iCloud, I get the "Account not verified" screen and I am told to check my email for instructions to verify. No email is ever sent. My ID and password work on all other Apple app's. Why not for iCloud?

I've tried both. First, I tried on my pc, where iTunes had installed iCloud when it last updated. I have iTunes installed on this computer (and on my iPad and iPhone), but that wasn't the issue.
So I went online, thinking I needed a separate iCloud Apple ID, but it prompted me for my current Apple ID and gave me the message about my ID being "valid" but not an iCloud account," which, lol, was what it had asked me to do in order to create one. I checked, and at least one other user is having the same issue. I'll attempt to copy/paste the Support request url: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4430653?tstart=0
Thank you for any help you can give.
Trish

EAM ID based or Role based? Why settle for just one?

G'Day All,
I've raised a question in the following blog, however I would like to open it up to other people as well so they might get something out of it and in the process might share their own thoughts on the matter at hand.
ID-Based Firefighting vs. Role-Based Firefighting
So this is where I am at this point:
From what I can gather so far, my understanding of EAM ID/ROLE based is as follows:
- Id Based: Logs in using own U.ID and through GRAC_SPM accesess FFID from the GRC Server and logs into the system assigned to them (ECC, SRM, CRM etc)
Only one user at a time can use a FFID.
Firefighter need not exist in every system assigned to them due to central logon however they need to exist in the GRC system
Knows exactly when FFID is being used as he/she has to login so has a psychological effect (good thing)
Better tracking of FF tasks - Specific log reports with Reason Codes. Bonus point from Auditors!
Two Log ins so potential to commit fraud. (1 action using own UserID and 1 action using FFID)
Could be hard to track and find out when a fraud has been committed so can be a problem with auditors.
      ID Based -> GRAC_SPM : TCode for Centralised FFighting -> You will see FFIDs assigned to you
      ID Based -> /n/GRCPI/GRIA_EAM : TCode for DCentralised FFighting -> You can see the FFIDs assigned to you
- Role Based: Logs into the remote system only using U.ID, so everything gets logged against that one ID.
Multiple users can use the FFROLE at once.
Firefighter has to exist in every system assigned to them - so multiple logons.
Hard to differentiate between FF tasks and normal tasks as no login required So easy to slip up
Time consuming to track FF tasks - No Specific log reports. No Reason Codes
     R.Based -> GRAC_SPM : TCode for Centralised FFighting -> You will see FFROLEs
     R.Based -> /n/GRCPI/GRIA_EAM : TCode for DCentralised FFighting -> Not applicable so wont work
So based on this there are pros and cons in both however according to SAP only one can be used. To me personally, it makes more sense to get the best of both the worlds right? So here is my question why can’t we just use both?
    . Really critical tasks -> FFID
    . Normal EAM tasks -> FFRole
Alessandaro from the original post pointed this out:
"Per design it isn't possible to achieve both types of firefighting at the same time. It's a system limitation and hence to configurable."
Well this is what I can't seem to get my head around. For a FFID, there is a logon session so it has to be enabled and as far as I can tell there is no way around it.
However for FFRole, there isn't such limitations/restrictions like starting a separate session. FFRole is just assigned to an end user for him/her to perform those tasks using their own user ID.
So in what way is it different from any of their other tasks/roles, other than the fact that they've got an Owner/Controller assigned to the FFRole? and
What is stopping us from using it when ID based is the default?
If I were to do the following does it mean I can use both ?
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 1 (GRC System) -> ID Based
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 2 (Plug-In) - > Role Based
Please excuse me if my logic is a bit silly, Role Based firefighting is only done on Plug-in systems so the following should work just fine:
   . Config Parameter: 4000 = 2 (Plug-In) - > Role Based
However for ID based, it is a Central Logon, so the following is a must:
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 1 (GRC System) -> ID Based
Which means both ID/Role based can be used at the same time, which seems to be working just fine on my system. Either way I leave it you experts and I hope you will shed some light on it.
Cheers
Leo..

Gretchen,
Thank you for thoughts on this.
Looks like I'm failing to articulate my thoughts properly as the conversation seems to be going in a different direction from what I am after. I'll try once more!
My query/issue is not in regards to if/what SAP needs to do about this or why there isn't more support from Companies/Organizations and not even, which one is a better option.
My query is what is stopping us(as in the end users ) from using both ID/Role based at the same time?
Now before people start referencing SAP documentation and about parameter 4000, humour me with the following scenario please. Again I would like to reiterate that I am still in the learning phase so my logic might be all wrong/misguided, so please do point out to me where I am going wrong in my thought process as I sincerely would like to know why I am the odd one out in regards to this.
Scenario
I've created the following:
FFID
FFROLE
Assigned them to, two end users
John Doe
Jane Doe
I set the Configuration Parameters as follows:
IMG-> GRC-> AC-> Maintain Configuration Settings -> 4000:1 - ID Based
IMG-> GRC (Plug-in)-> AC-> Maintain Plug-In Configuration Settings-> 4000:2 - Role Based
User1
John Doe logs into his regular backend system (ECCPROD001)-> executes GRAC_SPM-> Enters the GRC system (GRCPROD001)-> Because the parameter is set to ID based in the GRC Box, so he will be able to see the FFID assigned to him-> and will be presented with the logon screen-> Logs in -> Enters the assigned system (lets say CRMPROD001) At this point the firefighting session is under progress
User2
Jane Doe logs into her regular backend system (ECCPROD001) -> (can execute GRAC_SPM to check which FF Role has been assigned to her but she can see that in her regular menu, so there is no point) -> Executes the transactions assigned in FFROLEThis is done at the same time while FFID session is in progress
So all I want to know is if this scenario is possible? if the answer is No, then why not?
I physically carried out this scenario in my system and I had no problems(unless I am really missing the plot here), which brings me back to my original question: Why settle for just one?
Again to reiterate I am not getting into the efficacy or merits of this or even if one should use this. Just want to know if it is possible/feasible or not.
So there you have it. That's the whole enchilada(as they say there in Texas). I tried to word my thoughts as concisely as I can, if there are still any clarifications, more information you or anyone else reading this would like, please do let me know.
Regards,
Leo..

Forum for Oracle CGBU

Hi,
I'm working with Oracle CGBU, How can we create a new category and a forum for discussions related to CGBU?
Thanks,
Sachidanand
([email protected])
Bangalore,India

There's been some problem with XE forum registration. I had problem before.
You might want to post in Community Feedback Forum to let admin know.
Community Feedback (No Product Questions)

Why 2 Forums for HR?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for