Why crossdomain.xml

sorry i don't get it:
why should having a crossdomain.xml policy file on the server
that i load data from add any security?
if i'd operate a malicous site i'd just put the
crossdomain.xml on my site.
it does not seem logic to me that any server can decide if it
is secure that a flash app can load data from it.
it would seem more reasonable that the flex/flash app itself
decides where it is safe to load data from.
i don't understand the security underlying this concept.
what am i missing here?
thanks,
maxflex

Thanks for sharing that URL. I think this is the section that applies to my XSS issue:
If you imagine that the "public server" is instead a "hacker's server," and that instead of pushing out nice public content he's sharing harmful links to malware, etc., then I think you see the problem
"A public server that allows data access from any domain
Some sites are intended to be accessed by anyone. They contain publicly available data, such as news feeds and web services.
The Flash Player, and web browsers, generally disallow access to data outside the current domain. Because of this, a common practice is to deploy a proxy script on the server that hosts the Flash movie, which then requests data server-side before returning it to the movie.
This is a standard practice, but it requires the creator of the Flash movie create server-side logic just to access public data. If the public server has a policy file, all Flash movies can access its data without any additional server scripts.
A policy file that permits all domains to access it uses a wild card instead of specifying individual domains.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
         <!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
         <cross-domain-policy>
         <allow-access-from domain="*" />
         </cross-domain-policy> "

Similar Messages

  • Flex Mobile + crossdomain.xml

    Ok, so, here's a fun one for you.
    I have a webservice that the mobile app calls.  This works fine on a http://localhost/.... run, but when testing on the device, the device can't interpret localhost.
    Which means that I have to:
    1.) put the webservice on a domain (done)
    2.) do a crossdomain.xml file?
         <?xml version="1.0"?>
         <cross-domain-policy>  
               <site-control permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
               <allow-access-from domain="*"/>
         </cross-domain-policy>
    I mean, the domain has to be "*" because mobile apps can be anywhere....
    Anyone have any insight on this?  I've tried using the webservice on my domain server, but to no avail.

    Thanks for the reply.  I've done some further research and doubt that it might be due to crossdomain.xml, though it's still possible.
    I can successfully introspect my webservice using the Flex wizard if I do http://localhost/webservice.asmx?wsdl, but I cannot seem to introspect it using http://www.domain.com/webservice.asmx?wsdl even though I can access both urls in my web browser.
    I uploaded crossdomain.xml into my root so it was available at http://www.domain.com/crossdomain.xml but was still not able to introspect the service.
    The reason why crossdomain.xml was mentioned in the first place is that through the webservice wizard, it says "crossdomain.xml required".
    I'm not sure what's going on, but would certainly appreciate any suggestions.

  • Why is the Shockwave player not requesting the root crossdomain.xml

    Hi,
    I have a Director movie (DCR) that is presented to visitors to my website. The DCR is actually downloaded from a separate Content Delivery Network (CDN).
    On startup, the DCR connects to my original website to retrieve some additional information that is presented to the visitor. But because the DCR comes the CDN, when it attempts to access my website a warning dialog appears informing the visitor that the DCR is attempting to access another site and asking them to allow or deny access.
    I did some reading of the Adobe docs and found that from version 11.5, the Shockwave player will skip this dialog if the referenced domain includes a cross domain policy file that permits access. The movie can load a specific policy from the target domain, but if it doesn't the docs say that the player will read the default crossdomain.xml from the root of the target network.
    So I created and deployed the default crossdomain.xml as described in the documentation and redeployed my application. However, when the DCR started the same dialog appeared warning about the cross domain reference and asking me to allow or deny it.
    I thought perhaps there was an error in how I deployed the cross domain file, but when I checked more closely I discovered that Shockwave player never even requested the file from the target server.
    Does anyone have any idea why this might be happening? Am I missing some step that is required to make the player request the default cross domain policy file?
    Thanks in advance for any help people can offer.
    Damian

    I thought this had been fixed in the latest version of the installer, but perhaps not. Try the option suggested in this thread

  • Multiple plugtmp-1 plugtmp-2 etc. in local\temp folder stay , crossdomain.xml and other files containing visited websitenames created while private browsing

    OS = Windows 7
    When I visit a site like youtube whith private browsing enabled and with the add-on named "shockwave flash" in firefox add-on list installed and activate the flashplayer by going to a video the following files are created in the folder C:\Users\MyUserName\AppData\Local\Temp\plugtmp-1
    plugin-crossdomain.xml
    plugin-strings-nl_NL-vflLqJ7vu.xlb
    The contents of plugin-crossdomain contain both the "youtube.com" adress as "s.ytimg.com" and is as follows:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
    -<cross-domain-policy> <allow-access-from domain="s.ytimg.com"/> <allow-access-from domain="*.youtube.com"/> </cross-domain-policy>
    The contents of the other file I will spare you cause I think those are less common when I visit other sites but I certainly don't trust the file. The crossdomain.xml I see when I visit most other flashpayer sites as well.
    I've also noticed multiple plugin-crossdomain-1.xml and onwards in numbers, I just clicked a youtube video to test, got 6 of them in my temp plus a file named "plugin-read2" (no more NL file cause I changed my country, don't know how youtube knows where I'm from, but that's another subject, don't like that either). I just noticed one with a different code:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    -<cross-domain-policy> <allow-access-from domain="*"/> </cross-domain-policy>
    So I guess this one comprimises my browsing history a bit less since it doesn't contain a webadress. If these files are even meant to be deposited in my local\temp folder. The bigger problem occurs when they stay there even after using private browsing, after clearing history, after clearing internet temporary files, cache, whatever you can think of. Which they do in my case, got more than 50 plugtmp-# folders in the previous mentioned local\temp folder containing all website names I visited in the last months. There are a variety of files in them, mostly ASP and XML, some just say file. I have yet to witness such a duplicate folder creation since I started checking my temp (perhaps when firefox crashes? I'd say I've had about 50 crashes in recent months).
    I started checking my temp because of the following Microsoft Security Essential warnings I received on 23-4-12:
    Exploit:Java/CVE-2010-0840.HE
    containerfile:C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache2196625541034777730.tmp
    file:C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache2196625541034777730.tmp->pong/reversi.class
    and...
    Exploit:Java/CVE-2008-5353.ZT
    containerfile:C:\Users\Noname\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache1028270176376464057.tmp
    file:C:\Users\Noname\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache1028270176376464057.tmp->Testability.class
    Microsoft Security Essentials informed me that these files were quarantained and deleted but when going to my temp file they were still there, I deleted them manually and began the great quest of finding out what the multiple gigabytes of other files and folders were doing in that temp folder and not being deleted with the usual clearing options within firefox (and IE).
    Note that I have set my adobe flasplayer settings to the most private intense I could think of while doing these tests (don't allow data storage for all websites, disable peer-to peer stuff, don't remember exactly anymore, etc.). I found it highly suspicious that i needed to change these settings online on an adobe website, is that correct? When right-clicking a video only limited privacy options are available which is why I tried the website thing.
    After the inital discovery of the java exploit (which was discovered by MSE shortly after I installed and started my first scan with Malwarebytes, which in turn made me suspicious whether I had even downloaded the right malwarebytes, but no indication in the filename if I google it). Malwarebytes found nothing, MSE found nothing after it said it removed the files, yet it didn't remove them, manually scanning these jar_cache files with both malwarevytes and MSE resulted in nothing. Just to be sure, I deleted them anyways like I said earlier. No new jar_cache files have been created, no exploits detected since then. CCleaner has cleaned most of my temp folder, I did the rest, am blocking all cookies (except for now shortly), noscript add-on has been running a while on my firefox (V 3.6.26) to block most javascripts except from sites like youtube. I've had almost the same problem using similar manual solutions a couple of months ago, and a couple of months before that (clearing all the multiple tmp folders, removing or renaming jar_cache manually, running various antmalware software, full scan not finding a thing afterwards, installing extra add-ons to increase my security, this time it's BetterPrivacy which I found through a mozilla firefox https connection, I hope, which showed me nicely how adobe flash was still storing LSO's even after setting all storage settings to 0 kb and such on the adobe website, enabling private browsing in firefox crushed those little trolls, but still plugtmp trolls are being created, help me crush them please, they confuse me when I'm looking for a real threat but I still want to use flash, IE doesn't need those folders and files, or does it store them somewhere else?).
    I'm sorry for the long story and many questions, hope it doesn't scare you away from helping me fight this. I suspect it's people wanting to belong to the hackergroup Anonymous who are doing this to my system and repeating their tricks (or the virus is still there, but I've done many antivirus scans with different programs so no need to suggest that option to me, they don't find it or I run into it after a while again, so far, have not seen jar_cache show up). Obviously, you may focus on the questions pertaining firefox and plugtmp folders, but if you can help me with any information regarding those exploits I would be extremely grateful, I've read alot but there isn't much specific information for checking where it comes from when all the anti-virus scanners don't detect anything anymore and don't block it incoming. I also have downloaded and installed process monitor but it crashes when I try to run it. The first time I tried to run it it lasted the longest, now it crashes after a few seconds, I just saw the number of events run up to almost a million and lots of cpu usage. When it crashed everything returned back to normal, or at least that's what I'm supposed to think I guess. I'll follow up on that one on their forum, but you can tell me if the program is ligit or not (it has a microsoft digital signature, or the name micosoft is used in that signature).

    update:
    I haven't upgraded my firefox yet because of a "TVU Web Player" plugin that isn't supported in the new firefox and I'm using it occasionally, couldn't find an upgrade for it. Most of my other plugins are upgraded in the green (according to mozilla websitechecker):
    Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31 (green)
    Shockwave for Director (green - from Adobe I think)
    Shockwave Flash (green - why do I even need 2 of these adobe add-ons? can I remove one? I removed everything else i could find except the reader i think, I found AdobeARM and Adobe Acrobat several versions, very confusing with names constantly switching around)
    Java Deployment Toolkit 6.0.310.5 (green, grrr, again a second java, why do they do this stuff, to annoy people who are plagued with java and flash exploits? make it more complicating?)
    Adobe Acrobat (green, great, it's still there, well I guess this is the reader then)
    TVU Web Player for FireFox (grey - mentioned it already)
    Silverlight Plug-In (yellow - hardly use it, I think, unless it's automatic without my knowing, perhaps I watched one stream with it once, I'd like to remove it, but just in case I need it, don't remember why I didn't update, perhaps a conflict, perhaps because I don't use it, or it didn't report a threat like java and doesn't create unwantend and history compromising temp files)
    Google Update (grey - can I remove? what will i lose? don't remember installing it, and if I didn't, why didn't firefox block it?)
    Veetle TV Core (grey)
    Veetle TV Player (grey - using this for watching streams on veetle.com, probably needs the Core, deleted the broadcaster that was there earlier, never chose to install that, can't firefox regulate that when installing different components? or did i just miss that option and assumed I needed when I was installing veetle add-on?)
    Well, that's the list i get when checking on your site, when i use my own browseroptions to check add-ons I get a slightly different and longer list including a few I have already turned off (which also doesn't seem very secure to me, what's the point in using your site then for anything other than updates?), here are the differences in MY list:
    I can see 2 versions of Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31, (thanks firefox for not being able to copy-paste this)
    one "Classic Java plug-in for Netscape and Mozilla"
    the other is "next generation plug-in for Mozilla browsers".
    I think I'll just turn off the Netscape and Mozilla one, don't trust it, why would I need 2? There I did it, no crashes, screw java :P
    There's also a Mozilla Default plugin listed there, why does firefox list it there without any further information whether I need it or not or whether it really originates from Mozilla firefox? It doesn't even show up when I use your website plugin checker, so is there no easy way by watching this list for me to determin I can skip worrying about it?
    There's also some old ones that I recently deactivated still listed like windows live photo gallery, never remember adding that one either or needing it for anything and as usual, right-clicking and "visit homepage" is greyed out, just as it is for the many java crap add-ons I encountered so far.
    Doing a quick check, the only homepage I can visit is the veetle one. The rest are greyed out. I also have several "Java Console" in my extentions tab, I deactivated all but the one with the highest number. Still no Java Console visible though, even after going to start/search "java", clicking java file and changing the settings there to "show" console instead of "hide" (can't remember exact details).
    There's some other extentions from noscript, TVU webplayer again, ADblock Plus and now also BetterPrivacy (sidenote, a default.LSO remains after cleanup correct? How do I know that one isn't doing anything nasty if it's code has been changed or is being changed? To prevent other LSO's I need to use both private browsing and change all kinds of restrictions online for adobe flashplayer, can anyone say absurd!!! if you think you're infected and want to improve your security? Sorry that rant was against Adobe, but it's really against Anonymous, no offense).

  • IOError in IE but not in Firefox (possible crossdomain.xml problem)

    Yesterday, I hopefully debugged a problem that is occuring for our application in IE but not in Firefox.
    It has to do with accessing remote content from a separate domain.
    In every aspect it APPEARS to be a crossdomain.xml issue but the fact that this issue only arrises in IE is what has prompted me to post here.
    We have a solution in the works (bureaucratically speaking) but I want to double check here.
    Our application is on domain "a.domain".
    It access an xml file on "b.domain/xml/".
    And finally (this is the tricky part) it also accesses an xml file at "b.domain/forwardingPath/" which is actually forwarded to "c.domain/xml/".
    The crossdomain.xml is located at "b.domain/crossdomain.xml".
    The request for "b.domain/xml/anXMLFile.xml" works without any problem.
    The request for "b.domain/forwardingPath/anotherXMLFile.xml" succeeds in Firefox but not in IE (remember, the ACTUAL request is forwarded to "c.domain/xml/anotherXMLFile.xml").
    In IE I get an IOError.
    I believe we need an appropriate crossdomain.xml file also located at "c.domain/crossdomain.xml" and have put in that request.  What I want to confirm is whether this understanding is correct.  I am not a server-side person at all.  It's all elves and fairies to me.  And then finally, why the hell is this behavior inconsistent between IE and Firefox?  Is the Firefox version of flash player violating its own security standards?!
    I am cross-posting this at stack overflow.  http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7395931/ioerror-in-ie-but-not-in-firefox-possible-cross domain-xml-problem

    I've pinged our developers about this and here's what they have to say:
    "We did some work for the plugin around redirects andhence the correct behavior on Firefox.
    AFAIK, on IE we don't get notified of the redirect and can't participate in making security decisions during redirect scenarios. This behavior is out of our control.
    There is a workaround documented in the AS3docs here: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/system/LoaderCont ext.html#checkPolicyFile
    Here is the pertinent paragraph:
    Be careful with checkPolicyFile if you are downloading anobject from a URL that may use server-side HTTP redirects. Policy files arealways retrieved from the corresponding initial URL that you specify inURLRequest.url. If the final object comes from a different URL because of HTTPredirects, then the initially downloaded policy files might not be applicableto the object's final URL, which is the URL that matters in security decisions.If you find yourself in this situation, you can examine the value ofLoaderInfo.url after you have received a ProgressEvent.PROGRESS orEvent.COMPLETE event, which tells you the object's final URL. Then call theSecurity.loadPolicyFile() method with a policy file URL based on the object'sfinal URL. Then poll the value of LoaderInfo.childAllowsParent until it becomes true."
    Chris

  • Apache proxypass and crossdomain.xml not working

    Hi everyone,
    I have the following problem. I have set up jboss on a Linux server connecting to local port 8080 (localhost:8080).
    I have opened the application on port 80 with Apache ( www.myDomain.com) and set up a virtual host that proxies
    this connection to localhost:8080 where jboss is listening.
    <VirtualHost *:80>
        DocumentRoot /var/www/nyDomain
        ServerName myDomain.com
        Alias /crossdomain.xml /var/www/html/crossdomain.xml
        # proxy pass to the jboss server
        <IfModule mod_proxy.c>
        ProxyRequests Off
        <Proxy *>
            Order deny,allow
            Deny from all
            Allow from all
        </Proxy>
        ProxyPass /Stylect http://127.0.0.1:8081/Stylect
        ProxyPassReverse /Stylect http://127.0.0.1:8081/Stylect
        # ProxyPreserveHost on
        </IfModule>
    </VirtualHost>
    The crossdomain.xml file is at the root of the server and can be accessed with www.mydomain.com/crossdomain.xml
    <cross-domain-policy>
    <site-control permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
    <allow-access-from domain="*" to-ports="*" secure="false"/>
    <allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
    </cross-domain-policy>
    I can see in firebug that it's being downloaded when I first request the page - this is the response:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
       "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
    <html>
    <head>
      <title>Software as a Service Development. </title>
      <META name="description" content="Description here"><META name="keywords" content="Saas, fashion design, plm, production, nutrition, food, orders">
    </head>
    <frameset rows="100%,*" border="0">
      <frame src="http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/crossdomain.xml" frameborder="0" />
      <frame frameborder="0" noresize />
    </frameset>
    <!-- pageok -->
    <!-- 04 -->
    <!-- -->
    </html>
    Yet I still get a 2048 sandbox violation error.
    The crossdomain is needed because the proxied request
    appears to be coming from the public ip while jboss
    is bound to the local host.
    If I expose Jboss directly to the web all works well but there
    are too many security issues in that setup. Apache as a front is
    much better.
    The question is: is this the correct response I should be getting
    (or should it be directly the xml file) and why is it not working?
    How can I fix this?
    Any help much appreciated. I'm stuck.
    Dahn 

    Try adding security="false" inside the next line:
    <allow-access-from domain="*"/>
    so it would look something like
    <allow-access-from domain="*" security="false" />
    It fixed the problem for me.

  • Problems Accessing Crossdomain.xml

    Ok, so ive been searching for a solution to my problem for 3 days now with no avail... hopefully someone here can help.
    Im building a website that i want to allow users to post jobs with or without an attached file...
    here is the site.... http://soengjobopp.dyndns.org/
    If you go to the POSTAJOB section at the bottom, fill in some test information, click attach to select a file from your machine, press and press submit you will see the error i get... ERROR 2049! (The file wont be attempted to upload until the form has valid data)
    I have a crossdomain policy on my root directory.....  http://soengjobopp.dyndns.org/crossdomain.xml
    Everything works fine when im testing it on my localhost, but when i try to upload from a machine elsewhere i get an error....
    Ive used Firebug(firefox plugin) to monitor the network when im at a client machine and it shows that the crossdomain.xml is trying to be downloaded from http://localhost/crossdomain.xml... i have no idea why... i allow administrators to download file from specific jobs and everything works fine... its just when i want to upload files i get an error... would anyone know why the site would try to get crossdomain.xml from its own local host and not from  http://soengjobopp.dyndns.org/crossdomain.xml ?
    Ive tried the "recompile with network monitor disabled" trick and i have the same problem.
    Ive also tried the Security.loadPolicyFile("http://soengjobopp.dyndns.org/crossdomain.xml ") and it still tries to get its policy file from localhost...
    If anyone could help it would be greatly apprecieated...
    Thanks!

    Hi Rich,
    I followed the steps in your video when our system was R/3 4.7 (WAS 6.20) and the test worked fine, i.e. accessing the crossdomain by typing http://server:port/crossdomain.xml.
    I followed the same steps with our new version (we're undergoing an upgrade) but I kept getting the error message:
    "BSP Exception: the BSP URL /crossdomain.xml Does Not Contain Any Application Entries".  Then I saw Ivan post suggesting implementing OSS Note 1260386.  I applied the Note but I got the same error message. 
    Then I ran function ICFBUFFER_INIT to make sure the buffer is cleared, cleared the cache in the browser and still got the same error message.
    Our system is ERP 6.0, NetWeaver 7.0, level 17 (BASIS Component is SAPKB70017).
    Please help.  Thank you.
    Achille.

  • Crossdomain.xml Not Loading

    This may be a newb question. I’m trying to figure out why my swf file, running from localhost, is bypassing the crossdomain.xml when loading a xml file from a remote domain.
    I stored the crossdomain.xml at the root of the domain.
    http://www.mydomain.com/crossdomain.xml
    When I checked the HTTP headers, there’s no request sent out to get the crossdomain.xml file.
    Another issue is that the Security.sandboxType is always localTruested. Could that be the reason that the swf file is not checking the crossdomain.xml? If so, how can i change the sandboxType.
    Any help is appreciated!
    Thanks

    Can you look at the name of the file you're loading before you load it? So, if it contains .swf don't load? Aside from that, you can get the content type before the image/file is finished loading. You do it with the LoaderInfo object... something like this:
    var loader:Loader = new Loader();
    loader.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(Event.INIT, initHandler);
    function initHandler(event:Event):void {
        var loader:Loader = Loader(event.target.loader);
        var info:LoaderInfo = LoaderInfo(loader.contentLoaderInfo);
        trace(info.contentType);
    If you load a jpeg you will see: image/jpeg
    If you load a .swf you will see: application/x-shockwave-flash

  • Crossdomain.xml file not being called by the SWF

    Hi,
    I'm serving an swf file compiled using flex builder 3.2 through plain HTTP, the SWF file calls a service in the same domain through HTTPS, as such, I put the following file in the root directory of my web server:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.adobe.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
    <cross-domain-policy>
        <allow-access-from domain="*" secure="false" />
    </cross-domain-policy>
    and name it crossdomain.xml
    When the service is invoked, I get the following error: [RPC Fault faultString="Security error accessing url" faultCode="Channel.Security.Error" faultDetail="Destination: DefaultHTTP"]
    When I check the access log files of my web server (Apache), there's no entry for crossdomain.xml (it is not being requested), why?
    When I serve the SWF through HTTPs it works OK ... any ideas?
    I have tried in several machines (different browsers, different versions of Flash player) and no success.

    I am also experiencing the exact same problem.  I'm not able to change the crossdomain.xml file located in the root directory and am going to try creating a new policy file in a sub directory.  The problem I'm having is that my web service is called from a virtual path and I do not know where to save this new policy file.
    Have you tried to load in a specific policy file?
    Security.loadPolicyFile( "http://yourdomain.com/policyFile.xml" );
    Also, you may want to check which sandbox your swf file is in.  flash.system.Security.sandboxType.  This could be another cause to the error.  My swf file is in the "remote" sandbox.

  • Web services and crossdomain.xml HELP

    Hello
    I am using the web services connector to consume a service it
    all works
    fine in flash however in the browser it fails
    I can see it trying to load crossdomain.xml at the domain of
    the WS
    provider this is despite my putting:
    System.security.loadPolicyFile("
    http://dev.chatham.site/crossdomain.xml");
    frankly I am at a loss as to how to make this work I have
    tried.
    var allowpath = "
    http://www.postcoderwebsoap.co.uk";
    System.security.allowDomain(allowpath);
    how the hell do you let the connector connect?
    any insight would be greatly apreciated
    Rich

    tjacobs01 wrote:
    Hi all,
    This is a follow-up to the question I posted and answered myself yesterday.
    I have created a web service that returns Hebrew words in a string format of an XML document. This all appears to be working fine at this point. The only problem is that when I'm debugging in NetBeans, certain hebrew characters/words (note: some characters / words work!) xerces gives me an invalid utf-8 string (byte 1 of 2) exception in the display of the SOAP response - not the response itself, but I think in whatever netbeans is doing to display it. Not sure i follow. Are you referring to the debugger screens where the IDE shows variables/stacks etc? If so, i would say not to worry too much. IDE's are not perfect.
    I have tried testing the strings I am returning by themselves - xerces can parse when I save them into a file and load. So it seems like the problem is just with the >SOAP response / with netBeans.
    I understand that returning XML within a SOAP container could then be screwing up the parsing. Any thoughts as to why certain words and not others? Is there any way to fix this, and perhaps more importantly - is it important to fix this?Did you test this in a production like environment? If so, i would say its just a minor annoyance.

  • On WebServices, crossdomain.xml and debug-mode

    I'm building a conncetion to a remote webservice, and they
    don't have a crossdomain.xml file on their server (or it is placed
    badly or something).
    While developing my connection has worked fine, but when I go
    outside of the debug mode (actually running the swf/html from any
    other folder then the projects bin-debug) and the connection won't
    work. It returns no error and just seems to keep going ignoring the
    request. So I looked around for a bit and managed to turn on the
    trace() log file which brought the problem to my attention:
    Cannot load crossdomain.xml from server, halting request. (or
    something similar)
    This is fine now that I know of it, I can get the server
    people to add crossdomain for me. The questions I'm asking though
    is:
    Why does it work in the bin-debug filder?
    How can I capture the "Cannot load crossdomain..." trace? (my
    guess is that its generated in the flash player, and not flex
    library)

    Understand the SandboxType of flash player before getinto this issue.
    While inside the  bin-debug, your sandbox type is LocalTrusted. This will allow access to external system,
    When go go for the deployment it wont works, cos you sandbox type will be different (say Network with Local)
    http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=05B_Security_04.html
    The above URL will expain the security concept
    Nith

  • Crossdomain.xml with Flash player 9.0.115.0

    Hi gurus,
    I have just spent the best part of a day wading through the
    new security features of Flash Player 9.0.115.0. I use flash.socket
    library, so I have discovered that error message I've been getting
    will get worse, ie., next version of the Flash Player may not even
    connect. So I got the good oil from
    here.
    I have written a crossdomain.xml file that looks like this
    (it's in the www root):
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <cross-domain-policy>
    <site-control
    permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
    <allow-access-from domain="192.168.5.201"
    to-ports="7700"/>
    </cross-domain-policy>
    Problem is that the flash player adds the follwing line to
    the \Logs\policyFiles.txt it generates:
    Warning: Domain 192.168.5.201 does not specify a meta-policy.
    Applying default meta-policy 'all'. This configuration is
    deprecated. See
    http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
    to fix this problem.
    From my reading I have specified a meta-policy with the line:
    <site-control
    permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
    So my question is why can't it find the meta-policy?

    kcell,
    thanks for the reply. Actually you are a bit ahead of me. I
    have a single web-server and I'm not actually trying to cross
    domains! However, the security advice says (page 4 of the link I
    gave in my original post)
    "A URL policy file authorizes data loading from its own HTTP,
    HTTPS, or FTP server, whereas a socket policy file authorizes
    socket connections to its own host."
    So because I'm using a socket connection I still need a
    crossdomain.xml. For this sockect connection I am going to open up
    port 843 (as Adobe recommends) on my web-server for this policy to
    be loaded when calling flash.socket.connect(...).
    However, that isn't actually my problem. What I've also done,
    I think, is added a line to my crossdomain.xml file that will
    define a meta-policy, to prevent clients from other domains
    accessing my server (also recommended by Adobe). The line is:
    <site-control
    permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>, but I don't
    think my SWF is reading the file because I get that error message:
    Warning: Domain 192.168.5.201 does not specify a meta-policy.
    Applying default meta-policy 'all'. This configuration is
    deprecated. See
    http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
    to fix this problem.
    Sory about the excessive waffle!

  • #2170 error calling a webservice from Xcelsius having crossdomain.xml

    Hello together,
    we are facing a #2170 error indicating we don't have a proper policy file in place when executing a published Xcelsius flash in SAP BI application portal.
    We created a WebService that is running an SAP BI System 7.01. The WebService is function module based and was generated following the wizzard. Afterwards we created a Xcelsius app that consumes data from this WebService (via data connection). The resulting flash from Xcelsius was pulished to SAP BI System (portal).
    Since there are many entries in the SDN and the internet in general we finally also created an crossdomain.xml file on the BI system which can be accessed and is visible by using "https://<server>/crossdomain.xml".
    Now the confusion begins: We exported the flash from Xcelsius to local desktop and executed the corresponding HTML-file. It's working and I can receive/see WebService data (after adjusting flash-security-settings). If we upload both exported files (html and swf) to the BI system (as MIME objects) and execute the html again we are also receiving WebServervice data. So far so good. But if we execute the link from the SAP BI Portal (Xcelsius menu > SAP > Start) we still get the error #2170 indicating we don't have a proper domain policy file in place. But for my understanding we do have. So currently I would assume the error message is somehow misleading.
    During all the activities I found out that this error is also raised if the user has insufficient authorization. My user has SAP_ALL authorization for testing purpose.
    In general I would say we are not that wrong with our Xcelsius/WebService if we are not coming from BI portal. So my questions are:
    1.) Are there any authorization on portal side that might not fit and lead to this error? If insufficient authorizations produces such an error ...
    2.) Did we miss any other stuff during our try/fail-operations?
    Many thanks in advance for your hints.
    Steffen

    Hi Rajat,
    This is how the default trace looks
    FATAL: Application Servlet failed to notify devices.
    Caught java.rmi.RemoteException: Service call exception; nested exception is:
         com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.exceptions.InvalidResponseCodeException: Invalid Response Code: (503) Service Unavailable. The requested URL was:"http://<<server>>:50000/ManagementService/ManagementService?style=document"
         at com.om.mws.standaloneproxy.ManagementServiceBindingStub.notifyDevice(ManagementServiceBindingStub.java:1289)
         at com.om.mws.standaloneproxy.ManagementServiceBindingStub.notifyDevice(ManagementServiceBindingStub.java:1298)
         at com.om.ApplicationServlet$NotifyDevices.run(ApplicationServlet.java:86)
    Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.exceptions.InvalidResponseCodeException: Invalid Response Code: (503) Service Unavailable. The requested URL was:"http://<<server>>:50000/ManagementService/ManagementService?style=document"
         at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.wsdl2java.soapbinding.MimeHttpBinding.handleResponseMessage(MimeHttpBinding.java:980)
         at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.wsdl2java.soapbinding.MimeHttpBinding.call(MimeHttpBinding.java:1430)
         at com.om.mws.standaloneproxy.ManagementServiceBindingStub.notifyDevice(ManagementServiceBindingStub.java:1282)
         ... 2 more
    java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
    at java.lang.Thread.destroy(Thread.java:779)
         at com.omApplicationServlet$NotifyDevices.run(ApplicationServlet.java:92)
    Rgds
    Shashank

  • Security Error in accessing Web service from Flex.Where to put crossdomain.xml in axis container?

    Hi guys.
    Typically webservices are invoked across domains. Flash has defined certain policies which prevent crossdomain access. The only way to bypass this security feature is to put a crossdomain.xml file within the server root of the webservice provider i.e. in our case at http://abc.com. A sample example of crossdomain.xml is as below:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
    <cross-domain-policy>
         <site-control permitted-cross-domain-policies="all" />
         <allow-access-from domain="*" secure="false"/>
         <allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*" secure="false" />
    </cross-domain-policy>
    If the crossdomain.xml is not added the developer will get “Security Error accessing URL” type of messages.
    The above mentioned information should be enough for you to get your flex based WebService client up and running.
    We are using axis2 to build webservices. We deployed the webservices under axis2 container under repository/srvices folder . But in Flex when we try to call the webservices we were getting the exception saying security error in accessing url. The solution is we need to put the crossdomain.xml o that it is loaded at runtime and allow us to access. In tomcat if we put the file under ROOT directory we could accss the file and we were able to access the webservices deployed under Tomcat. But I googled for Axis2 container and couldnt find any solution.
    Please post the reply if anyone knows the solution to it.
    Thanks
    Raja

    Hi. So, I did take a quick look at the Axis2 standalone server and didn't see any way to server up a file such as crossdomain.xml. It seems like it might be a useful enhancement to have the ability to serve up files even if this functionality was very simple/limited and nothing like a full blown http server.
    I'd log an enhancement request against axis2 if this is something you'd like to have.
    http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2
    -Alex

  • Where to place crossdomain.xml in SAP ECC IDES?

    Hi,
    I have a flex application which uses webservices generated in SAP IDES system. This flex app is stored in portal server. Since the physical servers are involved, I get a security error message, which says, "Security error accessing url". I browsed through the net and found that, we have to place a crossdomain.xml file in the web root folder of the server from where we are fetching the data. In my case, it would be SAP IDES system.
    I wanted to know where do I place this xml file in IDES? What would be it's location and how can I generate a URL to access this xml file?
    Please let me know about this, if anyone has done this before.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thank you,
    Warm regards,
    Deepak

    Hi Durairaj,
    As mentioned in that thread, I created a BSP application in the server and loaded crossdomain.xml. It was accessible from the browser too.
    This is the xml code which is there in crossdomain:
    <?xml version="1.0" ?>
    <cross-domain-policy>
      <allow-access-from domain="*" />
      <site-control permitted-cross-domain-policies="all" />
      <allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*" />
      </cross-domain-policy>
    But this did not solve my purpose
    I have my flex application in a server, servera.abc.com and I am using the webservices of another server, serverb.abc.com
    I uploaded the crossdomain.xml in serverb.abc.com, in the following path through a BSP application:
    http://serverb.abc.com:8000/sap/bc/bsp/sap/zroot/crossdomain.xml
    But I still get the 'security accessing url' message in flex. It doesn't load the wsdl.
    I'm also using this piece of code in initialize event of the application in flex:
                           private function initSecurity():void{
                        Security.allowDomain("*");
                        Security.loadPolicyFile("http://serverb.abc.com:8000/sap/bc/bsp/sap/zroot/crossdomain.xml");
                        Alert.show("crossdomain xml loaded....");
    Where am I going wrong here?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Just one USB port on MacBook Pro 15"

    Hi, I just got a MacBook Pro 15" 2.33GHz. I may be silly but I find it has only one USB port! This is killing me because I need at least two USB port to connect my mouse and iPhone. Do I missed something? Thanks, ff

  • How to workaround the lack of 64 bit windows support of HWS

    I have very long patterns in text format for a traditional semiconductor digital tester that I need to use in a NI HSDIO card. The HSDIO driver can only import files of HWS type. The Digital Waveform Editor only supports HWS to save patterns with mor

  • Scheduling issue for splitted operations in process order

    Hello All, I am facing problem after scheduling splitted operation in process order. The scenario is as follows. In process order there are 5 operations. 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50. Out of the above operations 30 is splitted and two different resources ar

  • Drill down in crosstab report

    I'm working with a crosstab report displaying summary accounts on each row & current and prior year on each column. I'd like to create a drill down function for each of the summary accounts rows so that when I click on a summary account, the dept# th

  • Ressource Explorer - up to date?

    Hello I told a user to uninstall PC games I saw some time ago in SCCM Reports. Now I see some games in ressource explorer under his PC again. I do not know if these are the same games or new games. But I would like to make sure that the applications