Windows 7 Enterprise login performance issue RODC site

Hi,
We are deploying windows 7 enterprise to all our computers in our domain and we didn't have any performance issue on any site with Full DC. Now we are facing a problem with our multiple sites with RODC but only with new deployed windows 7 (WinXp is not having
this slow login problem). The problem is very strange. Whatever a user start a session on a desktop or laptop with Windows 7, wireless or cabled, when the user enter his credential and press the "validation arrow" next to the password nothing happen
(well it look like nothing happen). After 5 to 10 minutes at this logon screen, we finally see the logon process start applying domain policy, preparing the desktop etc etc and this take less then 10 seconds but remember, we just wait 5 to 10 minutes until
the computer process the "process my log in" botton. Sometime, the CTRL+ALT+DEL screen come back and when we press them we got nothing, we have to wait for the "logon" to occur before doing anything else with the computer.
I've looked to many way to solve this but for now nothing worked.

Hi,
Sorry for my dilatory reply. How about using a same user account to log on XP computer? Will it logon fast?
Have you tried to add a user account into Allowed RODC Password Replication Group for test? This problem probably caused by the password authentication problem In RODC host.
For further investigation, you can try to use Network Manitor at RODC host to capture package of client machine authenticate to a domain controller.
The blog about Understanding "Read Only Domain Controller" authentication
may be helpful.
After the above steps, We can narrow the cause of this problem.
If problem persists, this problem may caused by Windows 7 Client performance. Generally speaking, the problem like this most probably caused by sercurity application problem. You can try to disable or uninstall security application temportaily for test.
If there is any progress, please feel free let us know.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Workspace login performance issues

Hi folks,
Thousand of users are using my fm application and they are hitting servers by smart view,workspace..once it's reach peak stage my server was getting hung and we were impliment no.of performnce tunning ( Vertical clustering,cahing,compression,hfm performcne tunning,reg setting )..we appiled performnce tunning all possible ways ..still we are facing performance issues..
we are using 11.1.1.3 version..can anybody suggest me whta i need to do apart above changes..

Hi Denis,
To add on to the query, Basis have applied patch around two days back. As the thread you specified, member who was seeking the solution has not mentioned if the notes helped him finally. I think increasing the memory cache size might help. Also, the time taken to load the home page is irrespective of the load on the server, it takes same amount of time at off peak hours.
Regards,
Chitwanjit

Windows 8 Login Screen Issue

After a reboot of the computer, one of my son's friends typed in an incorrect Microsoft username into the login screen. I can't get it to go away or let me delete it and log in with the correct username. No where to click, no where to get out of this.
All of the information I have found online regarding the login screen requires me to make changes AFTER I'm logged in which is kind of the problem.

Hi RobRosenbalm,
Did you mean it stuck at the login screen with the incorrect username?
If yes, please reboot it again to type the correct account to check the result.
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support

SharePoint 2007 performance issue after upgrading the operating system

We upgraded the operating system of our SharePoint Server 2007 from 2003 to 2008 R2. After upgrade we rebuilt the SharePoint using content DBs we backed up before upgrade. All settings is same except that we moved the DBs to new SQL servers. Now users are
reporting performance issue with sites. I experienced it myself some of the pages takes 9-30 seconds to load. Also our SharePoint server is single server. I monitored the SharePoint Server and it is fine. I did fiddler trace and here are the result. I see
lots of 401 (login failed) errors then 302 (redirect) then 200 (OK). Do you know why we are getting 401 errors?
Result
Protocol
Host
URL
Body
Caching
Content-Type
Process
184
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
185
302
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
196
text/html; charset=UTF-8
iexplore:15344
186
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
187
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
105,487
private, max-age=0; Expires: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:37:48 GMT
text/html; charset=utf-8
iexplore:15344
188
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
189
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/prevbuttonltr.gif
76
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
190
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/nextbuttonltr.gif
78
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
191
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/day.gif
1,051
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
192
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/month.gif
1,068
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
193
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
28,814
max-age=31536000
text/css
iexplore:15344
194
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/week.gif
1,057
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
195
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/weekbox.gif
149
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
196
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/alldayDefault.gif
157
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
197
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttntoday.gif
146
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
198
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttn.gif
95
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344

Hi
when you request a Site collection (http://domain/) or a Site (http://domain/foo/) of your Publishing Site you get redirected to the http://domain/Pages/<WelcomePage>.aspx. SharePoint 2007 uses the 302 header (location temporarily moved) for
this purpose. Surprisingly even WSS uses the 302 header to redirect a root url to the default.aspx. In comparison ASP.NET uses an internal redirect to render the default page when the root url requested: there is no redirect in this situation.
Check the link which can give more input
http://blog.mastykarz.nl/sharepoint-2007-redirect-solved-using-301-instead-of-302-redirects/
for error 401 you can check this link
http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/97027-no-resources-401-unauthorized/d
and check SharePoint ULS logs and event viewer for any exceptions.
Please mark the Answer and Vote me if you think that it will help you to resolved your issue

The kerberos PAC verification failure when all users of only one RODC Site, trying to get access iis webpage of different site using Integrated Windows Authentication

The kerberos PAC verification failure when all users of only one Site which having only one RODC server(A), trying to get access iis webpage of different site which having WDC server(B) using Integrated Windows Authentication. But when they accessing the
website using IP address, it is not asking for credentials as I think it is using NTLM Authentication at that time which is less secure than Kerberos.
Note that:- All user accounts and Computers of the RODC has been allowed cache password on the RODC. Nearest WDC for the RODC (A) is the WDC (B).
The website is hosted on a windows server 2003 R2 and generating below system event log for those users of the RODC site :-
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Kerberos
Event Category: None
Event ID: 7
Date:
<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">date</var>
Time:
<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">time</var>
User: N/A
Computer:
<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">computer_name (the 2003 server)</var>
Description: The kerberos subsystem encountered a PAC verification failure. This indicates that the PAC from the client<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe
UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">computer_name</var> in realm <var
style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">realm_name</var> had
a PAC which failed to verify or was modified. Contact your system administrator.
This issue has been raised for last one week. Before that everything was fine. No Group Policy changed, Time also same.
In this situation do I need to do Demotion of the RODC and re-promote it as RODC again or is there any other troubleshooting to resolve it.
Thanks in Advanced
Souvik

Hi Amy,
Thanks for your response
I noticed that Logon server could become incorrect again after user re-login or restart of a workstation.
It seems root cause is different. Need a permanent solution.
The Workstations of the RODC site are getting IP from a DHCP server by automatic distribution of IP from a specific subnet for the site only. The RODC is
the Primary DNS server for the site.
I have checked the subnet and it is properly bound with only with that AD site. The group of users and workstations are in the same site AD organisational Unit.
Sometime I restarted the NET LOGON service and DNS server service on ther RODC server and sometime rebooted the server. But the Logon server issue has not fixed permanently.
The internal network bandwidth of the site is better than the bandwidth to communicate with other site.
The server is Windows server 2008 R2 standard and hosting the below roles
RODC
DNS
File server
The server performance is Healthy in core times when maximum users usually logins.
Any further support would be much appreciated Amy
Thanks
Souvik

Performance issues with class loader on Windows server

We are observing some performance issues in our application. We are Using weblogic 11g with Java6 on a windows 2003 server
The thread dumps indicate many threads are waiting in queue for the native file methods:
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '106' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" RUNNABLE
     java.io.WinNTFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(Native Method)
     java.io.File.exists(Unknown Source)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getFileSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:398)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSourcesInternal(ClasspathClassFinder.java:347)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:316)
     weblogic.application.io.ManifestFinder.getSource(ManifestFinder.java:75)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
     weblogic.application.utils.CompositeWebAppFinder.getSource(CompositeWebAppFinder.java:71)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.CodeGenClassFinder.getSource(CodeGenClassFinder.java:33)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findResource(GenericClassLoader.java:210)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResourceInternal(GenericClassLoader.java:160)
     weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResource(GenericClassLoader.java:182)
     java.lang.ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
     javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport$4.run(Unknown Source)
     java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
     javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.findJarServiceProvider(Unknown Source)
     javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.find(Unknown Source)
     javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(Unknown Source)
     org.ajax4jsf.context.ResponseWriterContentHandler.<init>(ResponseWriterContentHandler.java:48)
     org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources$HeadResponseWriter.<init>(ViewResources.java:259)
     org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources.processHeadResources(ViewResources.java:445)
     org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:193)
     org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.RenderResponseExecutor.execute(RenderResponseExecutor.java:41)
     org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:140)
On googling this seems to be an issue with java file handling on windows servers and I couldn't find a solution yet. Any recommendation or pointer is appreciated

Hi shubhu,
I just analyzed your partial Thread Dump data, the problem is that the ajax4jsf framework ResponseWriterContentHandler triggers internally a new instance of the DocumentBuilderFactory; every time; triggering heavy IO contention because of Class loader / JAR file search operations.
Too many of these IO operations under heavy load will create excessive contention and severe performance degradation; regardless of the OS you are running your JVM on.
Please review the link below and see if this is related to your problem.. This is a known issue in JBOSS JIRA when using RichFaces / ajaxJSF.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-6166
Regards,
P-H
http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/

ITunes on Windows 7 performance issues - slow and hangs

Is there any way to improve performance of iTunes running on Windows 7?
It has always been slow with lots of application hangs and stalls that will resolve themselves if you wait for iTunes to catch up, but I find it incredibly frustrating.
For example, when iTunes starts and if it is checking podcasts, the entire application is unresponsive until it finishes checking and refreshing podcasts.
Alternately, when viewing my iPad Air and looking at the list of apps installed via iTunes it can take 30 seconds before iTunes responds.
Considering that this is running on a system with a quad-core Haswell processor at 3.2Ghz, 16GB of RAM and Windows 7 x64 it is pretty unacceptable.
The efficiency at which iTunes operates is just appalling. I can run Adobe Photoshop and many more memory hungry and processor intensive applications than iTunes and get better performance than what I see in iTunes.
This is not specific to my system either. All of my family members have iPhones and their own computers and this performance issue exists on every computer I have ever run iTunes on.
Is there any way to manually tune performance because this is pretty crappy. It's been bugging me for years, but today just kind of feels like the last straw.

I guess the answer is, "It's terribad, live with it"

Performance issue of BI reports in SAP Enterprise portal

Dear Friends,
We have integrated BI reports with SAP Enterprise portal 7.0.Reports are running properly But the issue is reports are taking more time to dispsaly its content and leading it to performance effect.
In Bex ( BI side) reports performance is little better than SAP EP platform. BI Team also looking for ways to improve performance at BI side.
Could you please share your valuable ideas to improve the performance at SAP EP side also ..
Thanks and Regards
Ratnakar Reddy

Hi ratnakar,
The first step is to identify which component is causing the performance problem. Run your report in the portal but try appending the string &PROFILING=X in the end of the URL. This will generate BI statistics which you can use to see which component (Java stack, ABAP stack, Database) is causing the performance issue.
Hope this helps.

Performance Issue in NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterface in windows JRE 7

NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterface() call takes 10 times more time when run in Windows JRE 7. The same call runs much faster in JRE 6.
Sample Program,
I wrote a small program which just fetches the network interfaces using java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces() as below,
------------------------------------ Program Start ------------------------------------
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
public class PerfNetTest {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     Enumeration niEnum = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces();
     long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.println ( "Total Time Taken For One Call: " + (endTime-startTime));
     startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
          niEnum = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces();
     endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.println ( "Total Time Taken For Ten Call: " + (endTime-startTime));
------------------------------------ Program End ------------------------------------
Compiled the above code in Java 6 and ran the above program in JRE 6 and JRE 7. JRE 7 takes approximately 10 times more time than JRE 6. This leads to a huge performance issue in our project.
I ran it 5 times in each JRE versions and below are the test results,
When run in JRE 6
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 18
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 81
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 17
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 80
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 19
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 80
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 18
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 79
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 18
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 80
When run in JRE 7
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 98
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 891
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 100
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 869
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 98
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 859
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 99
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 871
c:\test\net>java PerfNetTest
Total Time Taken For One Call: 99
Total Time Taken For Ten Call: 888
Is there any other way to optimize the performance in JRE 7 internally, Can the above issue considered as a bug with Windows JRE 7? Can I go and submit a bug for this?

I have simplified the program to point out the exact issue. In the actual usage we need to know immediately or whenever there is an ip change, it might be because of the change in ip to same nic card or when connected to a network via any of the nic card (wifi enabled, etc).
Overall it is particularly important to as we used to get the NetworkInterfaces for every features. As a result of this, 60 feature which gets executed roughly around .5 milliseconds in java6, now consumes almost 6-10 seconds in java 7.
Also in our client server application, where client queries for NetworkInterfaces and further sends a requests to the server where we have to support at least 100 transaction per seconds(TPS for complete client-server throughput), with 100's of client systems querying for its own NetworkInterface is consuming time and certainly reduces the overall throughput.
Currently I am more inclined to cache it and refresh in a separate thread internally, but certainly I wanted to avoid it because the throughput will be less for the first request and especially when it works perfectly fine with java6.
Edited by: Niran on Jun 28, 2012 3:08 AM

Upgrade to Hyperion Enterprise 6.5.1.1.102 - Performance Issues

We are testing an upgrade to Hyperion Enterprise 6.5.1.1. We have applied the Update 2 patch which I believe officially takes the version to 6.5.1.1.102. In testing reports and consolidation between the new version and the old 6.4.1 version of Enterprise, we are seeing a delay in how long it take reports to generate and for Consolidation to complete. With reports, we see the delay specifically when running large reports that pull a lot of data.
Currently, our 6.4.1 Hyperion application is installed on a Win2003 server and our users access Hyperion via Citrix. The 6.5.1.1.102 version is installed on a Win2008 server and is being accessed through Citrix.
To isolate this issue, we loaded Hyperion locally on a server and the timed some reports. The 6.5 reports take just as long to run as on our current v6.4 platform. So, it appears there is a performance issue running 6.5 enterprise through Citrix. Has any one else experienced this type problem or have any suggestions. We have been referred to numerous performance tuning notes from Hyperion support but nothing seems help.
Thanks.

Hi,
I would suggest you to apply the latest patch 6.5.1.1.103, and I would strongly recommend you to upgrade to HFM.
Hyperion Enterprise and Hyperion Enterprise Reporting Statement of Direction (Doc ID 1396504.1)
Hope this helps,
Thank you,
Charles Babu J

ITunes 7.3.2.6 and Windows Vista Performance Issues

I recently purchased an 80GB iPod, and downloaded iTunes promptly, disregarding all the negative attention about how "iTunes crashes your computer" or "iTunes kills Windows". So far, the only real problem I've had with iTunes is the amazingly poor performance it has on my computer. When iTunes is minimized to the system tray, or compressed into Mini Player mode, it runs better, but not well.
Running in the full mode, the player bogs down my computer substantially. Knowing my laptop isn't a powerhouse, I expected a slight bit of slowdown, since there is some evident with QuickTime.
UPDATE: I've just stumbled across something. Apparently, wiggling my mouse over the iTunes program, iTunes runs about two or three times faster. The moment I stop moving the mouse cursor over the window, the speeds return to slow. It seems to only do this during the "Processing Album Artwork" phase. Bizarre? Very. Any explanations?
I find this to be very annoying, especially when syncing. Syncing my library (which is about five or six gigabytes) takes an amazingly long time. Are there any workarounds, registry hacks, or anything else that can be done? Thanks!
Message was edited by: Atlink

Do you have ReadyBoost enabled on the PC? If so, by way of experiment, try disabling that as per the instructions from the following document:
Troubleshooting iTunes for Windows Vista video playback performance issues
... any help at all with the performance issues?

POA performance issues under windows 2008 R2

Hello - we are running GW 8.02 hp3 and recently moved our main post office (~600 users) from Netware to Windows 2008 R2 (running under Vsphere 4.1).
We have started seeing intermittent slow performance issues esp. when moving a message from one folder to another, or sending a broadcast email.
It doesn't appear to be a hardware resource issue: disk queues don't exceed 1, with low latency (7-15ms) and we're not cpu or memory bound (that I can see).
Here are our current config settings:
Message Worker Threads: 15
Maximum GWCheck Worker Threads: 8
C/S Handler Threads: 30
Max Physical: 2048
Max App Connections: 4084
Soap Threads: 20
We don't see any serious errors in the logs when performance becomes slow. Could this just be a tuning issue?

In article <[email protected]>, Javerkio wrote:
> we are running GW 8.02 hp3 and recently moved our main post
> office (~600 users) from Netware to Windows 2008 R2 (running under
> Vsphere 4.1).
>
Windows is the lowest performing host for GroupWise, so that is a part
of what you are hitting.
How are you monitoring memory usage? I've found that the vCenter tools
aren't a good indicator of that, where as the Windows tools are better
in that respect. The biggy is that you don't want much paging to disk.
How much do you have assigned to this VM?, how many cores? And are
these ESX box(es) over committed on those two?
Those settings on their own don't really mean a whole lot. What we need
to see is what is actually being used, and if you are running out of
them, then upping those specific numbers can help. The best way is to
watch the POA web interface for the relevant settings.
http://hostnameorIP:7181/
Andy Konecny
Knowledge Partner (voluntary SysOp)
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Andy's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75037

Performance issues with LOV bindings in 3-tier BC4J architecture

We are running BC4J and JClient (Jdeveloper 9.0.3.4/9iAS 9.0.2) in a 3-tier architecture, and have problems with the performance.
One of our problems are comboboxes with LOV bindings. The view objects that provides data for the LOV bindings contains simple queries from tables with only 4-10 rows, and there are no view links or entity objects to these views.
To create the LOV binding and to set the model for the combobox takes about 1 second for each combobox.
We have tried most of tips in http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jclientperf/index.html, but they do not seem to help on our problem.
The performance is OK (if not great) when the same code is running as 2-tier.
Does anyone have any good suggestions?

I can recommend that you look at the following two bugs in Metalink: Bug 2640945 and Bug 3621502
They are related to the disabling of the TCP socket-level acknowledgement which slows down remote communications for EJB components using ORMI (the protocol used by Oracle OC4J) to communicate between remote EJB client and server.
A BC4J Application Module deployed as an EJB suffers this same network latency penalty due to the TCP acknowledgement.
A customer sent me information (that you'll see there as a part of Bug# 3621502) like this on a related issue:
We found our application runs very slow in 3-Tier mode (JClient, BC4J deployed
as EJB Session Bean on 9iAS server 9.0.2 enterprise edition). We spent a lot
of time to tune up our codes but that helped very little. Eventually, we found
the problem seemed to happen on TCP level. There is a 200ms delay in TCP
level. After we read some documents about Nagle Algorithm, we disabled a
registry key (TcpDelAckTicks) in windows2000 on both client and server. This
makes our program a lot faster.
Anyway, we think we should provide our clients a better solution other than
changing windows registry for them, for example, there may be a way to disable
that Nagle's algorithm through java.net.Socket.setTcpNoDelay(true), in BC4J,
or anywhere in our codes. We have not figured out yet.
Bug 2640945 was fixed in Oracle Application Server 10g (v9.0.4) and it now disables this TCP Acknowledgement on the server side in that release. In the BugDB, I see backport patches available for earlier 9.0.3 and 9.0.2 releases of IAS as well.
Bug 3621502 is requesting that that same disabling also be performed on the client side by the ORMI code. I have received a test patch from development to try out, but haven't had the chance yet.
The customer's workaround in the interim was to disable this TCP Acknowledgement at the OS level by modifying a Windows registry setting as noted above.
See Also http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=328890
"New registry entry for controlling the TCP Acknowledgment (ACK) behavior in Windows XP and in Windows Server 2003" which documents that the registry entry to change disable this acknowledgement has a different name in Windows XP and Windows 2003.
Hope this info helps. It would be useful to hear back from you on whether this helps your performance issue.

Performance issue in DB need help with analysing this ADDM report

Hi,
My environment:
Os: RHEL5U3 / 11.1.0.7 64 bit / R12.1.1 64 bit
Issue:
Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instance. Normally the issue will occur 5 to 10 minutes occasionally per day. At the time of issue we not able to access the EBS application its taking time to load. But backend all the oracle, listener and apps services are up and running. No locks at table and session level. Cpu and memory usage is normal.
We have monitored using "Enterprise Manager" for this issue and we found the wait session present more in Active session tab. At this time EBS application is not able access its loading too time. After some time the in Active session tab the wait session came normal and when we try to access the EBS application its working fine.
We try to find the cause of the issue by running addm report. But am not able to understand what its says. Kindly suggests me
ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_42656'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 14754 to 14755.
Time period starts at 17-APR-12 11.00.22 AM
Time period ends at 17-APR-12 12.00.33 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'PRD' with DB ID 1789440879.
Database version 11.1.0.7.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance PRD, numbered 1 and hosted at
advgrpdb.advgroup.ae.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 18674 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was 5.17.
Summary of Findings
Description Active Sessions Recommendations
Percent of Activity
1 Top SQL by DB Time 3.43 | 66.33 5
2 Buffer Busy 2.52 | 48.81 5
3 Buffer Busy 1.39 | 26.81 2
4 Log File Switches .91 | 17.56 1
5 Buffer Busy .56 | 10.87 2
6 Undersized SGA .38 | 7.37 1
7 Commits and Rollbacks .28 | 5.42 1
8 Undo I/O .18 | 3.53 0
9 CPU Usage .13 | 2.57 1
10 Top SQL By I/O .11 | 2.21 1
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Top SQL by DB Time
Impact is 3.43 active sessions, 66.33% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is 1.59 active sessions, 30.8% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" for possible
performance improvements.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
(R.OPS_INSTANCE =
decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
= C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
:q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
(R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
R.status_code NoWait
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was executed 4686 times and
had an average elapsed time of 1.2 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 85% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
Rationale
Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
class "Configuration" accounted for 9% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
Recommendation 3: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.91% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" for possible
performance improvements.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" was executed 266 times and had
an average elapsed time of 7.6 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 86% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
Rationale
Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
class "Configuration" accounted for 7% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
Finding 2: Buffer Busy
Impact is 2.52 active sessions, 48.81% of total activity.
Read and write contention on database blocks was consuming significant
database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is 1.42 active sessions, 27.44% of total activity.
Action
Trace the cause of object contention due to SELECT statements in the
application using the information provided.
Related Object
Database object with ID 34562.
Rationale
The SELECT statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was significantly
affected by "buffer busy" waits.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
(R.OPS_INSTANCE =
decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
= C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
:q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
(R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
R.status_code NoWait
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Recommendation 1: Schema Changes
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, .62% of total activity.
Action
Consider rebuilding the TABLE "APPLSYS.FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS" with object
ID 34651 using a higher value for PCTFREE.
Related Object
Database object with ID 34651.
Rationale
The UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "cqc5crhxxt36t" was significantly
affected by "buffer busy" waits.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID cqc5crhxxt36t.
UPDATE FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS FLRF SET END_TIME = SYSDATE WHERE
FLRF.LOGIN_ID = :B2 AND FLRF.LOGIN_RESP_ID = :B1 AND FLRF.END_TIME IS
NULL AND (FLRF.FORM_ID, FLRF.FORM_APPL_ID) = (SELECT F.FORM_ID,
F.APPLICATION_ID FROM FND_FORM F, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE F.FORM_NAME
= :B4 AND F.APPLICATION_ID = A.APPLICATION_ID AND
A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B3 )
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 4: Log File Switches
Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
Log file switch operations were consuming significant database time while
waiting for checkpoint completion.
This problem can be caused by use of hot backup mode on tablespaces. DML to
tablespaces in hot backup mode causes generation of additional redo.
Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
Action
Verify whether incremental shipping was used for standby databases.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Configuration" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.63% of total activity.
Finding 5: Buffer Busy
Impact is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
A hot data block with concurrent read and write activity was found. The block
belongs to segment "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" and is block 243489 in file 36.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
Action
Investigate application logic to find the cause of high concurrent read
and write activity to the data present in this block.
Related Object
Database block with object number 37562, file number 36 and block
number 243489.
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" spent significant time on
"buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "326up1aym56dd" spent significant time on
"buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 326up1aym56dd.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Recommendation 2: Schema Changes
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
Action
Consider rebuilding the TABLE "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" with object ID 37562
using a higher value for PCTFREE.
Related Object
Database object with ID 37562.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 6: Undersized SGA
Impact is .38 active sessions, 7.37% of total activity.
The SGA was inadequately sized, causing additional I/O or hard parses.
The value of parameter "sga_target" was "4096 M" during the analysis period.
Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .12 active sessions, 2.33% of total activity.
Action
Increase the size of the SGA by setting the parameter "sga_target" to
4608 M.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.51% of total activity.
Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time.
Impact is 0 active sessions, .03% of total activity.
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 7: Commits and Rollbacks
Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations
were consuming significant database time.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O to the
online redo log files.
Rationale
The average size of writes to the online redo log files was 163 K and
the average time per write was 68 milliseconds.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Finding 8: Undo I/O
Impact is .18 active sessions, 3.53% of total activity.
Undo I/O was a significant portion (26%) of the total database I/O.
No recommendations are available.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than
expected.
Impact is .08 active sessions, 1.46% of total activity.
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Finding 9: CPU Usage
Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
Time spent on the CPU by the instance was responsible for a substantial part
of database time.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
Finding 10: Top SQL By I/O
Impact is .11 active sessions, 2.21% of total activity.
Individual SQL statements responsible for significant user I/O wait were
found.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .11 active sessions, 2.22% of total activity.
Action
Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID b3pnc5yctv2z5.
INSERT INTO ZX_TRANSACTION_LINES_GT( APPLICATION_ID ,ENTITY_CODE
,EVENT_CLASS_CODE ,TRX_ID ,TRX_LEVEL_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_ID ,LINE_CLASS
,LINE_LEVEL_ACTION ,TRX_LINE_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_DATE
,LINE_AMT_INCLUDES_TAX_FLAG ,LINE_AMT ,TRX_LINE_QUANTITY ,UNIT_PRICE
,PRODUCT_ID ,PRODUCT_ORG_ID ,UOM_CODE ,PRODUCT_CODE ,SHIP_TO_PARTY_ID
,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_ID ,BILL_TO_PARTY_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_ID
,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID
,SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID ,SHIP_FROM_LOCATION_ID ,BILL_TO_LOCATION_ID
,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,HISTORICAL_FLAG
,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CODE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_DATE
,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_RATE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_TYPE
,TRX_LINE_MAU ,TRX_LINE_PRECISION ,HISTORICAL_TAX_CODE_ID
,TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION
,LINE_INTENDED_USE ,PRODUCT_TYPE ,USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS
,ASSESSABLE_VALUE ,INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE ,ACCOUNT_CCID
,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,TRX_LINE_NUMBER
,TRX_LINE_DESCRIPTION ,PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION ,USER_UPD_DET_FACTORS_FLAG
,DEFAULTING_ATTRIBUTE1 ) SELECT :B4 ,:B3 ,:B2
,PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID ,:B1 ,PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID ,'INVOICE'
,NVL(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE,'UPDATE') ,'ITEM'
,NVL(PRL.NEED_BY_DATE, SYSDATE) ,'N' ,NVL(PRL.AMOUNT,
PRL.UNIT_PRICE*PRL.QUANTITY) ,PRL.QUANTITY ,PRL.UNIT_PRICE
,PRL.ITEM_ID ,(SELECT FSP.INVENTORY_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
FINANCIALS_SYSTEM_PARAMS_ALL FSP WHERE FSP.ORG_ID=PRL.ORG_ID)
,(SELECT MUM.UOM_CODE FROM MTL_UNITS_OF_MEASURE MUM WHERE
MUM.UNIT_OF_MEASURE=PRL.UNIT_MEAS_LOOKUP_CODE) ,MSIB.SEGMENT1
,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID ,PV.PARTY_ID ,PRH.ORG_ID
,PV.PARTY_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID
,PRL.DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID ,(SELECT HZPS.LOCATION_ID FROM
HZ_PARTY_SITES HZPS WHERE HZPS.PARTY_SITE_ID = PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID)
,(SELECT LOCATION_ID FROM HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS WHERE
ORGANIZATION_ID=PRH.ORG_ID) ,PRL.VENDOR_ID ,PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,NULL
,NVL(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, :B9 ) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_DATE,
SYSDATE) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE, :B8 )
,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_TYPE, :B7 )
,FC.MINIMUM_ACCOUNTABLE_UNIT ,NVL(FC.PRECISION, 2) ,NULL
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY, NULL),
NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_CATEGORY, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION,
NULL), NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.LINE_INTENDED_USE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_TYPE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS, NULL),
NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.ASSESSABLE_VALUE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(:B6 , 'REQIMPORT', PRL.TAX_NAME,
DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE,
NULL), NULL ) ) ,NVL((SELECT PRD.CODE_COMBINATION_ID FROM
PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PRD WHERE PRD.REQUISITION_LINE_ID =
PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND ROWNUM = 1), MSIB.EXPENSE_ACCOUNT )
,PV.VENDOR_ID ,PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,PRL.LINE_NUM ,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION
,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION ,(SELECT 'Y' FROM DUAL WHERE :B6 = 'REQIMPORT'
AND PRL.TAX_NAME IS NOT NULL) ,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL PRH, PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL PRL,
ZX_LINES_DET_FACTORS ZXLDET, PO_VENDORS PV, PO_VENDOR_SITES_ALL PVS,
MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSIB, FND_CURRENCIES FC WHERE
PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = :B5 AND PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID =
PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND ZXLDET.APPLICATION_ID(+) = :B4 AND
ZXLDET.ENTITY_CODE(+) = :B3 AND ZXLDET.EVENT_CLASS_CODE(+) = :B2 AND
ZXLDET.TRX_LEVEL_TYPE(+) = :B1 AND ZXLDET.TRX_LINE_ID(+) =
PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID AND PV.VENDOR_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_ID AND
PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID AND
MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID(+) = PRL.ITEM_ID AND MSIB.ORGANIZATION_ID(+) =
PRL.ORG_ID AND FC.CURRENCY_CODE(+) = PRL.CURRENCY_CODE AND
NVL(PRL.MODIFIED_BY_AGENT_FLAG, 'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CANCEL_FLAG,
'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') <> 'FINALLY CLOSED' AND
PRL.LINE_LOCATION_ID IS NULL AND PRL.AT_SOURCING_FLAG IS NULL
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5" was executed 3 times and had
an average elapsed time of 138 seconds.
Rationale
Average time spent in User I/O wait events per execution was 137
seconds.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
period.
Regards
Athish

Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instanceFor production issues, please log a SR.
Was this working before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please see these docs.
AutoInvoice Performance Issue When Processing Tax [ID 1059275.1]
R12 : System Hangs When Attempting To Save Blanket Release After Applying Patch 11817843 [ID 1333336.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

How should I report forum performance issues?

The forums rely heavily on the caching features of browsers to improve the speed of page rendering. Performance of these forums should greatly improve after a few pages because more and more of the images, css and javascript is cached in the browser. As a consequence, when reporting forums performance issues the report should include some information on the state of the browser cache to determine whether the issue is a browser issue or a server issue. Such detailed information is generally not available from just watching the browser screen, but needs to come from specialized tools such as performance monitor plugins and recording proxies.
The preferred report method for performance issues is to use the speed reporting features build into or available as a plugin for a browser for both the page you want to report a problem with and several refence pages in the site. Detailed instructions are listed below separated out for different browsers. If possible, please use Firefox for submitting the report because it provides an export format that can be read back electronically.
Known performance issues
The performance issues with any screen with a Rich Text Editor, such as the Reply window and the compose Private Message window have been acknowleged and improvements are being implemented.
Mozilla Firefox (preferred)
Warning: it is currently not recommended to generate a speed report when logged in. The speed report has enough detail for somebody else to hijack your session and impersonate you on the forums. If you really must report while logged in, make sure you log out your browser after generating the speed report and wait at least 4 hours before posting.
Install the Firebug plugin
Install the NetExport 0.6 extension for Firebug
Enable all Firebug panels
Switch to the "Net" panel in Firebug
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Browse to the page where you are experiencing the performance problem.
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Browse to the page where you are experiencing the performance problem.
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
When you report a performance problem please attach the 6 exports from the Firebug Net panel and an explanation of how you are experiencing the issues (for instance how much slower it is then normal) and include a description of your internet connection (dial-up, dsl, cable etc.) and the country from where you are connecting. If you have non-standard tweaks to your Firefox configuration (such as pipelining enabled) or are running any plugins please include that information in your report as well.
Google Chrome
Open the Developer Tools (Ctrl-Shift-J)
Navigate to the resources tab
Enable resource tracking.
Click on this link
Export the resource loading data.
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Click on this link
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Navigate to the page where you experience the performance problem
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Click on this link
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Click on this link
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Navigate to the page where you experience the performance problem
Export the data
Since Google Chrome does not have an export format for the Resource Tracking information best current practice is to take a screenshot and note the hover details for any resource with a tail that is longer then 25% of the total load time. When you report a performance problem please attach the screenshots and an explanation of how you are experiencing the issues (for instance how much slower it is then normal) and include a description of your internet connection (dial-up, dsl, cable etc.) and the country from where you are connecting.
Apple Safari
The Apple Safari Web Inspector has a Resources panel similar to the Resources panel in the Google Chrome developer tools.To get there, follow these steps:
Show the menu bar.
Go to preferences
Go to the Advanced Tab
Check “Show Develop menu in menu bar”.
From the Develop menu select “Show Web Inspector”.
Collecting the performance information and exporting works exactly the same as in Google Chrome. Please refer to the instructions for Google Chrome.
Microsoft Internet Explorer
IE does not have native features to analyze web traffic. No plugins have been found that produce the required information (please let us know if we missed any). For now, please reproduce the issue with Firefox, Chrome or Safari.
Please note that due to the reliance on Javascript for the interactive effects the performance of these forums will be much better on MS IE 8 then on previous versions of MS IE.

Hi
It works, check once again...
regards
Swami

Windows 7 Enterprise login performance issue RODC site

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for