Wip gl account amount and fbl3n line item gl account not matched

hi sap gurus
Cound any solve this error
i got one error at the time of wip calculation i.e., during settlement of order, the wip gl account amount and the FI line item gl account amount i.e., in fbl3n line item the wip gl account shows the differnt amount.
now my question is why system shows like that Plz any one tell me the solution.

SAP Note says 968812
There are various reasons for verified differences:
1. You made direct FI postings to material balance sheet accounts.
2. In MM account determination, balance sheet accounts are used for operations other than 'BSX'.
3. Material documents exist that have no FI follow-on document, even though they should.
4. There are FI documents or other accounting documents but the source document in materials management is missing.
Solution
(Point 1)
The amounts from these postings do not have any equivalent in the material valuation and therefore cause the MM/FI differences. You must cancel the corresponding postings in FI. You must then set the 'Post automatically only' indicator (XINTB) in the account master record (fs00).
(Point 2)
In MM account determination, material stock accounts can only be assigned during operation 'BSX' because only these postings update the material valuation. Postings from other operations, such as price difference (PRD) or revaluations (UMB), lead to MM/FI differences. The balances resulting from this must be transferred to other accounts in FI.
(Point 3)
Your system contains active customer enhancements (user exits, customer exits, BAdIs) that cause an additional 'COMMIT WORK' statement to be processed. This is not allowed and results in inconsistencies. The incorrect documents can be corrected by SAP Remote Consulting (SAP employees should refer to internal Note 941721).
(Point 4)
This case is identical with case 3. However, usually it is not a 'COMMIT WORK' statement that is responsible but a 'ROLLBACK WORK' statement in the customer source code. In particular, method MB_DOCUMENT_BEFORE_UPDATE in BAdI MB_DOCUMENT_BADI creates a ROLLBACK without program termination and an incomplete document because the documents in accounting are created after the BADI. Therefore, a ROLLBACK must always be accompanied by a program termination.
The MM document cannot be regenerated. The accounting documents must be deleted. This can be initiated by a message (which may be subject to charges) on component FO-GL-GL-X. See also Note 636442.
(General)
If the cause of the problem is unclear, SAP support can run an analysis. In this case, first implement the additional reports from Note 32236 in your production system.

Similar Messages

  • How to avoid output file and error lines when condition does not match

    Hi Experts
    A customer want to send purchase order files to several vendors and each vendor has their own requirement to content and file format. I have prepared scenarios for each vendor and a template is (conditionally) called when CardCode matches. It works fine, - PO file is generated when CardCode matches, but error lines are written to SAP B1 Control Center each time CardCode does not match the one defined in a scenario (100 or more times per day). Problem is that these error lines does not get automatic deleted. Conditional processing are made in this way:
    Result Message in SAP B1 Control Center when CardCode does not match:
    I tried to avoid an error line in SAP B1 Control Center when CardCode does not match in this way:
    Then no error lines are written to SAP B1 Control Center, but an output file is generated each time (order file when CardCode matches and an empty file when CardCode does not match).
    Any suggestions on how to avoid both errors types (error lines in SAP B1 Control Center and empty output files)?
    Or - can lines in SAP B1 Control Center be automatic deleted?
    Regards
    Steen

    Hi Steen,
    using <b1im_skip> should be the right approach, if you're working with B1 OUTBOUND.
    Following extract form the B1i help describes the usage to skip the outbound processing:
    1.1 Skipping Outbound Processing
    If you do not want to hand over the message to the receiver system, the scenario step can create a special tag that indicates to generic processing in the integration framework to skip the message processing.
    Add the following to the final transformation atom (atom0):
    <b1im_skip xmlns= ”” info=”my info” msglog=”true” msgout="yes">
    If the integration framework skips the message, it puts the message log information to the Filtered section, if the message log is switched on. The result message contains the Message skipped by vBIU logic information.
    info
    To display an individual message, define it using the info attribute.
    msglog
    If you want to avoid an entry in the message log, introduce the msglog attribute and set it to false.
    msgout
    To display the skip information in the Success section of the message log, use the msgout attribute and set it to yes.
    In case you don't want any MsgLogEntry in case of a skipped message, please enter the following in final atom0:
    <xsl:template name="transform">
    <xsl:attribute name="pltype">xml</xsl:attribute>
    <xsl:choose>
    <xsl:when test="$msg/BOM/BO/Documents/row/CardCode=&apos;C20000&apos;">
    <xsl:call-template name="transform2"/>
    </xsl:when>
    <xsl:otherwise>
    <b1im_skip info="skipped" msglog="false"/>
    </xsl:otherwise>
    </xsl:choose>
    </xsl:template>
    Best regards
    Bastian

  • HT1918 I am trying to change my account information and it always says it does not match the bank

    I am trying to update my credit card information on my account.  When I my finished, I get a message that says it does not match my back informaiton, I don't know what else to do, help?

    on ios device go to settings - itunes app stores - click on your apple id - select view apple id- and then enter password. - your billing info is in the account window. 
    on computer open itunes - go to itunes store - either sign in - or click apple id - view apple id - enter password - billing info under account window

  • Want to see VAT amount based on line item.

    Dear Friends,
    In accounting document if I have 1 line item in billing VAT is coming fine and I can see the VAT amount for particular line item in accounting document but when there are more then 1 line item for example 5 line item then VAT is coming consolidate of all 5 line item please tell me how can I see VAT based on every line item,
    Regards
    Sager

    Hi
    You weren't assigned any account key to this Condition type. Pls Check...
    If I am wrong Kindly inform.................................
    Regards

  • Derivation of Profit Centers in case of bank and Cash line items

    We are in the process of configuring the Profit Center Accounting functionality. We are in ECC 6.0 but have not migrated to New G/L.
    We understand that Profit center needs to be derived for each of the items for which it does not flow online in realtime. As regards Bank and Cash Line Items, we are not able to understand how Profit Center Derivation will happen.
    We have posted an FI payment document using Tcode F110 and further to which we executed F.5D and 1KEK. Further to this, we have checked the Profit Center Total records report (2KEE). It updates the vendor line items. But it does not reflect the Bank line item. Unless this happens, we understand that our Profit Center wise Trial Balance will not tally.
    Kindly let us know how bank and Cash line items will update in PCA. In our view, it should derive the Profit center from the offsetting entry in the vendor invoice. Pl. correct me if I am wrong.
    Pl. help.
    Venkat Iyer

    Hi Venkat,
    You may define a derivation rule in 3KEH
    Regarda
    Sachin

  • Offsetting account in Vendor, Customer and GL line item report

    Hi All,
    There is one requirement from our client. They want offsetting account in Vendor, Customer and GL line item report.(FBL1n, FBL3n and FBL5n).
    As this field is there in selection screen in lay out setting but field coming as blank no off setting account is coming. It was coming in old SAP 4.7 system but same is not coming in ECC6.0.
    Kindly let me know if any development is requirement, if yes than which tables we have refer for the same.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Abhinav Sharma

    Hi Abhinav,
    There is a SAP not and you can refer to that - SAP OSS note 112312
    T.Code: FIBF
    After entering in above T.code
    Follow Path
    Settings  Products of a customer
    Product   : XXXX
    Text        :  XXXX
    Active     :  Tick it
    Click on Back i.e. F3
    Follow Path
    Settings >P/S Function Modules > of a customer
    Event: 00001650
    Product: XXXX
    Function Module: LINE_ITEMS_GET_GKONT
    Now Go to FBL3N display of any account
    After opening the account display click on Change Layout i.e. CTRL+ F8
    And Select
    Offsetting A/C Type & Offsetting A/C no.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO
    Edited by: SAPFICO on Dec 1, 2010 8:26 AM

  • Relationship accounting and billing line item

    Hello,
    I have a fairly simple question. Is there a way to exactly determine from which billing line item an accounting line item was derived?
    In other words, I have an accounting line item and want to know to which billing line item it belongs.
    My question is purely focusing on line item level.
    Thanks in advance
    Stephan

    Hello,
    I think thats because the invoices have not hit FI yet.
    I feel this is more of a configuration issue and not any development or ABAP issue.
    Check with your SD/FI functional consultant. But usually these fields should be populated.
    We had lot of reports based on this logic in my previous assignments.
    cheers,
    Sushil Joshi

  • Multiple line item in billing but only one line item in accounting document

    Hi Everyone,
    I am having one scenario in which sales order has more than one line item. Only one billing document is create for all line items in Sales Order but billing document contains as many items as sales order has. In accounting document of billing i find only one customer line which has total amount of all line items in billing as debited. My requirement is Accounting document also should have as many line of customer-debit as in billing items i.e sales order. For example :
    (1) Sales order has 2 line items.
    (2) Billing document is only ONE and has 2 line items
    (3) currently accounting document has only ONE line of Customet - Debit ( Total amount of both items)
    My requirement is
    Accounting document should have 2 line item of customer - Debit
    Customer - Debit (amount of first line item)
    Customer - Debit (amount of Second line item)
    Sales - Credit
    How can it be done ?
    Regards,
    Manish

    Hi,
    This is the SAP expected behaviour
    As far as the values correspond to same account key and same GL account as per account determination, then ti will be posted as a single line item in FI document.
    If you want the customer specific items to be posted in two GL accounts , then you have to do the account determination that way.
    For example, you should have a condition table in FICO as follows.
    Sales org/ Account key / Customer
    For this condition table, the entries shoudl be as follows.
    5110/ERS/Customer A  GL ACCOUNT IS 5000100
    5110/ERS/Customer B GL ACCOUNT IS  5000200
    In this case, there will be 2 entries for the invoice instead of just one line entry.

  • Difference in GL Balance display and GL line item display

    Dear All,
    Can any one help me why the difference between GL display and GL line items display?
    Thanks in advance
    regards
    Elan

    Hi,
    You can do the following:
    1. carryout gl balance carryforward from previous to current year : Use t.code:F.16
             You can cross check the fs10n balance with FBL3N balance from previous years.  Assume these balance are matching for previous year 2007 and 2008, you have this problem only in 2009, then you can carryforward this balance from 2008 to 2009 once again. Some times users may post some adjustment entries as per the auditors recommendations. If this balance is not matching from 2007 itself, then first carryforward the balances to 2008 then 2009.  You can run this transaction no of times.
    2. check the master data of gl account through t.code:FS04, whether any changes has been done to line item display field?
               If you find any changes to line item display field then run the program "RFSEPA01" to get all the line items.
    3.If your issue was not resolved even after the above two activities, then let me know the  sap version you r working.
    all the best
    Prasad

  • FS10N balance not tie with FBl3N line item totals

    Hi
    I searched the forum for posting on FS10N and FBL3N incorrect balances and I did not any post appropriate for my issue. Hence I am posting my issue here.
    For a particular month, say 072010, FS10N GL balance does not tie with FBL3N line item totals. I am not sure why. In our case, we did not archive any line items and this is not related to year end carry forward. Year beginning GL balances look fine. We dont have any negative postings. Only few GL balances are off. We are using 4.7 version.
    Do you know why this inconsistency and how to rectify it? Is there any program which I run apart from Yead End carry forward?
    any ideas really appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hello
    We have already this trouble.
    To correct it you need to proceed like this (when NewGL is not activate, with new Gl there is one new programm)
    Without newGL
    - Block account to be posted (transaction FS00 Block for posting in the company view)
    - Delete open item, by using the programm RFSEPA03 (you need to adapt it by a copy because if you don't you can't run it), also this programm will unflag your account in the company view
    - Delete line item by the standrd program RFSEPA04
    - Create the line item by the standard program RFSEPA01
    - if this account is managed by open item, run the programm RFSEPA02 (you need to do the same adjustement of the RFSEPA03)
    With NewGL, there is something new. the program RFSEPA02 is linked with a new transaction and you don't have to adjust it FAGL_ACTIVATE_OP. The difference is when you create the open item, you have to define the default profit center and default value depending of the customizing of the leading ledger.
    BBest regards
    Philippe,
    Thanks for the rewards.

  • XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item

    Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
    **Please see xml below.**
    - <LIST_G_COMPANY>
    - <G_COMPANY>
    <C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
    <C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
    <GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
    <STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
    <STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
    <C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
    <C_NO>No</C_NO>
    <C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
    <BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
    - <LIST_G_HEADERS>
    - <G_HEADERS>
    <POH_REMARKS />
    <CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
    <STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
    <REV>0</REV>
    <PRINTED_DATE />
    <TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
    <BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
    <C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
    <VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
    <ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
    <ON_HOLD />
    <VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
    <ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
    <C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
    <PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
    <REVISED_DATE />
    <PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
    <C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
    - <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
    - <G_BREAK_LINES>
    <LINE>1</LINE>
    <LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
    <REV1 />
    <ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
    <UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
    <PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
    <UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
    - <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
    - <G_SHIPMENTS>
    <CLOSED_CODE />
    <LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
    <LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
    <NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
    <NEED_BY_DATE />
    <PROMISED_DATE />
    <SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
    <C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
    <C_FLEX_ITEM />
    </G_SHIPMENTS>
    </LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
    - <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    - <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
    <PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
    <CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
    </G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    - <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
    <PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
    <CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
    </G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    </LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
    <C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
    </G_BREAK_LINES>
    - <G_BREAK_LINES>
    <LINE>2</LINE>
    <LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
    <REV1 />
    <ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
    <UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
    <PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
    <UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
    - <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
    - <G_SHIPMENTS>
    <CLOSED_CODE />
    <LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
    <LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
    <NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
    <NEED_BY_DATE />
    <PROMISED_DATE />
    <SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
    <QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
    <C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
    <C_FLEX_ITEM />
    </G_SHIPMENTS>
    </LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
    - <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    - <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
    <PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
    <CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
    </G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    - <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
    <PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
    <CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
    </G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    </LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
    <C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
    <C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
    </G_BREAK_LINES>
    </LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
    <C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
    <C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
    </G_HEADERS>
    </LIST_G_HEADERS>
    </G_COMPANY>
    </LIST_G_COMPANY>
    <XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
    <YES>Yes</YES>
    <NO>No</NO>
    <ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
    <CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
    <COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
    </XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
    **Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
    SELECT pol.line_num Line
    , pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
    , pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
    , pol.closed_code
    , plt.line_type Line_Type
    , &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
    , &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
    , pol.item_revision Rev
    , pol.item_description Item_Description
    , pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
    , pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
    /* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
    , to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
    'AMOUNT',null,
    nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
    , hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
    , pll.promised_date Promised_Date
    , pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
    , ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
    'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
    'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
    NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
    , ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
    'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
    'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
    NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
    , ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
    'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
    'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
    NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
    , ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
    'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
    - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
    'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
    - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
    NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
    :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
    , ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
    'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
    'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
    NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
    , pol.po_header_id
    FROM po_line_locations pll
    , mtl_system_items msi
    , mtl_categories mca
    , po_lines pol
    , po_line_types plt
    , hr_locations hrl
    WHERE
    ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
    AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
    AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
    AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
    AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
    AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
    /* Bug No 141118
    Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
    Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
    has no shipments */
    AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
    AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
    AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
    AND &P_WHERE_CAT
    AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
    ORDER BY pol.line_num

    > I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
    When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
    > Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
    No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
    > I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but  the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
    In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

  • Line item wise account determination

    Hi,
    Suppose i have an invoice of Rs 1000 amount where 2 line items exist(1st line item value 600 & 2nd line item amount is 400) .In this case when release it for accounts the accounting entry is:--
    Customer a/c debit 1000
    To Revenue account 600
    To Revenue account 400
    But we want it should goes like this
    Customer a/c 600
    To Revenue a/c 600
    Customer A/C 400
    To Revenue a/c 400
    Means customer account should be debited as many time as many line items are there with respect to line items amount.
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Satya

    Hi Satya,
    The standard accounting for an SD billing document has only one customer line and that is fine!
    Customer a/c debit 1000 => There can be only one
    To Revenue account 600
    To Revenue account 400
    Just to check if your requirement can be done:
    SAP provides a customer exit to change the customer line ACCIT.
    EXIT_SAPLV60B_002: You can use this exit to change the customer line in the accounting document. This exit is processed once the ACCIT structure is filled in with data from document header VBRK.
    This exit is used to modify the customer line, not to generate other ones, so it will not solve your problem.
    My recommendation: Instead of doing anything that might break SAP standard functionality, please check the requirement as IMHO it does not make sense.
    If you really want several customer lines, then generate several SD invoices, each one with it's own customer line as the first FI document item.
    Define an invoice split routine and ... problem solved.
    Best of all: Do nothing as standard functionality is correct for 99,99 % of customers!
    Hope it helps,
    Franck Lumpe
    Freelance SAP Consultant

  • Profit Center population in the Vendor and Customer Line items

    hello
    our client is asking for  getting profit center in the vendor and customer line items  where in the view FBL5n and fbl1n we are not getting the profit center populated - in the new gl i understand that there is a standard report based on the gl account.
    but our business is not satisfied with the report and expecting report at profit center level.
    Can any one suggest any way of doing this.
    regards,
    Vijay

    Dear Vijay,
    Let me provide you my view of solutioning for this. This is an enahcement that needs to be done
    1. You can get the profit center from the given vendor and customer line item at the time of posting, using an enahcement you will be able to capture it.
    2. Existing the profit center field is not populated in the BSIK,BSAK,BSID and BSAD tables
    3. Hence, in the same enhancement once you capture the profit center , you can write the code that profit center is updated in these tables also.
    4. This will help you to do the vendor line item wise selection in the FBL1N,  FBL5N profit center wise.
    Constraints of this solution:
    The only constraint remains where in the for a given document if there are multiple profit center, then the system will do the splitting profit center wise for a vendor line item, which will not populate the profit center in those tables as there is only one field available in the bsid etc.. tables.
    This basically would be the one the soltuion where in as seeen from the end user ther eis no change in the front end interface , the way they are doing always they can do.
    You need to also take care the % of document splitting means cross profit center postings /cross document splitting charactericstics postings and the volume involved in this. so that you can suggest this to your client.
    Regards,
    Bharathi.

  • FBCJ LINE ITEM AND FI LINE ITEMS ARE DIFFERENT

    Dear Expert
    FBCJ LINE ITEM AND FI LINE ITEMS ARE DIFFERENT

    Hi,
    It seems from the screen shot you are seeing different documents as in the first screen shot it clearly shows you have booked the multiple expenses under one see the below screen shot we have circled it
    whereas FB03 screen shows different.
    You can do one thing click on circle item and check the expenses involved in it and accordingly go to FBL3N and display documents for that G/L for the date 05.04.2014.
    Hope your issue has been resolved else revert.
    Regards,
    Tejas.

  • Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
    But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
    For line item 10 -
    1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
    2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
    In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
    Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
    How can i create the same...
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Prasanthi

    Dear Prithviraj,
    CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
    I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
    Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and  BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
    thanks
    Regards,
    Weng

Maybe you are looking for

  • I am looking for following report

    Dear Expert ,                        I am looking for following report , please let me know the T codes for follo reports : a) Assembly Log book Entry b) Assembly Log book approval c) Machine log book entry d) Machine Log book approval e) Monthly att

  • 3.3.8 Create a Business Scenario Configuration (Developer Guide)

    Hi guys, I am using the 13 step wizard installation tool to set up Duet Enterprise. I have the SCL on 1 box - NW1 and the backend system on 1 box - ER4. I have completed all the step correctly and found no errors until I reached the Starter Services

  • Round to two decimal places...and keeping trailing 0

    Ok, I have done a search on rounding. So I made this function:     private double round(double number){        double d = Math.pow(10, 2);        return Math.round(number * d) / d;     }However, if I use a number like 3.59999, it returns 3.6. For wha

  • ITunes crashes wireless network

    Here's the problem... Using a Netgear router with a Netgear wireless USB adapter. Launch iTunes and the error message comes up that it can not connect to iStore (even though I though I disabled it in parental controls) and from that point on my netwo

  • Basic Que for a day :::::::

    WHICH SOFTWARE CYCLE DOES SAP-ABAP FOLLOWS ???? LET ME DESCRIBE IT IN MORE DETAIL.... DOES IT FOLLOW INCREMANTAL MODEL, WIN-WIN CYCLE.... LIKE THIS... I HOPE YOU INTELLIGENT GUYS AND GIRLS WOULD HAVE GOT MY QUESTION... THANKS A LOT.... WARM AND COOL