Without GR-Based IV, No PO History

Dear all,
I've created a PO without GR-based IV setting, when I posted the invoice verification (MIRO), why is it that it did not show in the PO history? Is there anyway to reflect the posting of IV has been done in the PO?
Thank you.
Regards,
Edwin

HI
Please check if this Purchase order is present in the Table EKBE.
If you do not find, then please check table RBKP, using the invoice number.
If it is present then Check table RSEG, using the invoice number, in the table also check if the Purcahse order number & item are present in the Invoice line.
If you dont find any doucments in any of the tables, then repost the invoice using MIRO
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Similar Messages

About invoice verification without GR-based indicator set in PO

Dears,
As I know, when carry out invoice verification for a PO without GR-based IV set in PO/Vendor/PIR, there will be no reference invoice quantity and value in item lines of the invoice. User must input them manually according to real values in the invoice paper sheet delivered by Vendor.
Now our client want the system sets the default value from PO in invoice verification, and they don't want to tick GR-based IV indicator, how to realize it?
Thanks all for your reply!

Dear,
1) At the time of time of Vendor master - XK01.
In purchasing view tick on GR Bsd Inv.
So due to this, at the time of purchase order creation this indicator is autometically put from vendor master.
2) Quantity of purchase order is autometucally pur from good receipt.
So create good receipt first than create invoice verification.
So due to this at the time of invoice verification system take quantity from good receipt
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh.

Budgetary Ledger is used without Periodic Based Encumbrance Tracking

Hello dear experts,
If I post any budget document as a fund reservation (FMX1) a fund precommitment (FMY1) or a fund commitment (FMZ1) the systems shows the following error message:
Message no. FMFG_BLCORE030
"Budgetary Ledger is used without Periodic Based Encumbrance Tracking".
After the systems show that message, error message (in red), is extrange because the systems lets save. This happen in the different transaction before written.
The great problem comes at the moment that I want to post the payment request because the systems in this point does not let me save the document.
Does any body know how can I repair this error message.
Thank you very much for your help.
Best regards.
Rubé

Hello Ruben,
I am sorry because my previous reply may not be useful for you.
With "BL" I meant "Budgetary Ledger"
PBET is Period Based Encumbrance Tracking.
In other words, you should use an update profile being period-based and not fiscal year-based.
As a general rule, Spanish customers use update profile 109 or 359. So maybe update profile 350 would not help you as it works as fiscal year-based and you should override many value types in order to get Period-based (PBET) active.
You can find how your update profile will work by using report RFFMMONI. This report shows the basic settings of your FM Area and how the relevant value types will update FM depending on the assigned update profile.
Regarding to PBET:
If you are not familiar with this functionality, let me suggest you to visit this link:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_01/helpdata/en/9b/9e2a39b487605fe10000000a114084/content.htm">PBET</a>
I understand the fact that probably the help.sap.com may not look as useful as you expect since probably you may not find all answers "in the next 2 seconds". But I think it is a really good start point...
Hope it is useful for you
Kind regards,
Mar

How to get tables the size should be based on 3 months history.

Hi,
I am junior DBA, Actually, I want to get the details of columns D,E,F and G. For employee and dept tables the size should be based on 3 months history.
How to get pls suggest me.
Regards,
Venkat.
Junior DBA

Venkat wrote:
Hi,
I am junior DBA, Actually, I want to get the details of columns D,E,F and G. For employee and dept tables the size should be based on 3 months history.
How to get pls suggest me.
Regards,
Venkat.
Junior DBAWhat are columns D,E,F, and G? Size of what is based on three months history of what?? How does this size of an unknown entity relate to columns D,E,F and G?

Multiple Windows without Document based project?

Is there a way to put multiple windows in my web browser without a document based application? I hate document based projects. A regular project is much easier to work with. What makes a Document based application so special anyway? Thanks in advance.

Well, it gives you documents. You can save and open them. It keeps track of its windows and its own nib files.
A document-based application might not be appropriate for your program. You can create windows on the fly. It is a bit more work that way. I don't think I've ever done it. Any applications that weren't document-based also had only a specific number of windows that were all defined in the nib file.
What do you hate about document-based projects? You don't have to use them. Just keep an open mind and come back later and try them again. It took me a couple of tries before I got the hang of core data. Document-based applications might make more sense the next time around.

Partial delivery without GR Based IV in split valuation scenario

Dear,
We are using split valuation for our materials.
I'm reading on http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/47/61017e49f011d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm the following sentence:
In the case of partial deliveries for a purchase order, you can only valuate each partial delivery separately if goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined in the purchase order (the field GR based IV must be selected on the order item screen). If goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has not been defined, the valuation type that you enter for the first partial delivery is binding for the following partial deliveries.
We have the requirement to valuate partial deliveries separately.
We can however not switch on the GR-based IV flag. The business scenario requires the invoice posting to Goods In Transit to be done before the Goods receipt booking.
Moreover, additional unplanned delivery costs need to be debited to the PO lines after the initial invoice posting, which is not possible in a GR-based IV scenario. (GR quantities can only be invoiced once)
How can I separately valuate partial deliveries without switching on the GR-based IV flag?
Thanks for your swift reply.
Simon

Hi Ravi and Yann,
Thank you for your inputs. OSS note-956083 can not be applied in my case due to the hight system version (patch level 550).
I have already raised this issue to SAP, but in the lack of proper infrastrucure SAP can not access the system. (BASIS guys are still struggling with it)
Well...let me give you recap-
We have not activated nor implemented any BAdi so far (Vanila SRM 5.0 EC scenario) PO creation for goods is working fine and as desired. But when it come across with PO with limit item or services, system throws an error as -
"PO 5100000263: Service-based invoice verif. requires GR "NO" or G R-based invoice verif."
Would deeply appreciate if you guys can share insight on this issue.
Thank you for your assistance!

I want to remove "Restore Previous Session" without disabling crash/tab restore and history

I have checked "Clear history when ff closes" & "Active logins" / "Saved passwords" but nothing.
The options of restoring a session after a crash and reopening an accidentally closed tab are great, but I just can't feel ok that everyone on my pc can restore a whole session with an email (facebook, forum,etc) account logged in with the "Restore Previous Session" "feature", if I forgot to log out before closing Firefox.
For me this is a big privacy issue. Please don't make me switch to Chrome!

I managed to remove the "Restore Previous Session" button from the home page by changing my default home page with this : www.google.com/firefox/ (the default home page from the previous versions of Firefox). It worked for me, I hope it works for you too.

ERS without Gr-based invoice verification

Hi all,
I have a question about ERS, greatly appreciated if anyone can give me some inputs.
I create a PO with ERS flagged but not "GR-bsd IV" in po line item, then I do a PO receipt. I read from help that I cannot run ERS in this case. However, in my understanding ERS is just an IV creation process based on receipts, so if the receipt is already there why can't it just create the IV?
I ask this question because in my business case I would like to have more flexibility. So logically, by flagging "ERS" only I can do the following at any time:
1) Post Invoice before GR.
2) Do GR and then ERS automatically.
Anyone if I can do this? Thanks.

Hi,
The standard SAP system is designed in such a way that when you want to go for ERS, the prerequisites are:
1. Evaluated receipt settlement must be flagged in the purchase order item.
2. The vendor must be flagged as being subject to ERS in the vendor master record.
3. The goods receipt must refer to a purchase order.
Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification must be defined for the purchase order item.
4. A tax code must have been maintained in the purchase order item.
5. The order price of the materials may not be an estimated price.
If you want to carryout on the way you want, then it involves new development.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Viswanath

Split without delimiter based on position

Hi,
I am having a query i need to split the query based on the position i specify
Say
string is 123456789101112
am having position as 1,1,2,5,4,2
i need as
1
2
34
56789
1011
12
I need to insert this in to my table
create test table (col1 number(10),col2 number(10),col3 number(10),col4 number(10),col5 number(10),col6 number(10));
col1,col2,col3,col4,col5,col6
1,2,34,56789,1011,12
Thanks

i'm having some 80 columns in my table how to do for 80 columns Will data inserted into all 80 columns ?
Will there any change in order of insertion i.e. suppose data will be in col1,col2,col10,col11,col15,col23,col45,col80,col14,col68,col5... ?
How you will calculate the number of columns in which that number string is going to inserted ?
If there are fix 80 columns then rather than writing block of code for 80 times, you can use varray type variable and then proceed ahead. Since, in the above code, I have not handled exception(s), so exception handling will be another part of code to make it smooth.
Between, at the moment, I am not getting why there is error which is in the end :
create type np_type is varray(80) of number
create type cn_type is varray(80) of number;
create type cxn_type is varray(80) of varchar2(100)
I created TEST table by below pl/sql block :
declare
execstr varchar2(2000) :='create table test(';
begin
for i in 1..80 loop
execstr:=execstr || 'col' || to_char(i) || ' number,';
end loop;
execstr:=substr(execstr,1,length(execstr)-1);
execstr:=execstr || ')';
dbms_output.put_line(execstr);
execute immediate execstr;
end;
create or replace procedure myproc1
strx in varchar2, delarray in np_type)
as
execstr varchar2(200);
cn cn_type;
cxn cxn_type;
xpos number:=1;
begin
for i in 1..80 loop
select Delimiterlength into cn(i) from sp_table where Splitid = delarray(i);
select substr(strx,xpos,cn(i)) into cxn(i) from dual;
execstr:='insert into test values(' || cxn(i) || ',';
xpos:=length(cxn(i));
end loop;
execstr:=substr(execstr,1,length(execstr)-1);
execstr:=execstr || ')';
dbms_output.put_line(execstr);
--execute immediate execstr;
end;
/SQL> declare
2 v np_type:=np_type(4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4);
3 begin
4 dbms_output.put_line(v(80));
5 --exec myproc1('11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111',v);
6 end;
7 /
4
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 v np_type:=np_type(4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4);
3 begin
4 --dbms_output.put_line(v(80));
5 exec myproc1('11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111',v);
6 end;
7 /
exec myproc1('11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111',v);
ERROR at line 5:
ORA-06550: line 5, column 6:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "MYPROC1" when expecting one of the
following:
:= . ( @ % ;
The symbol ":=" was substituted for "MYPROC1" to continue.
SQL>
Try to remove this error. Here '1111...' is the string which is going to be entered and '44444...' is the Splitid of sp_table.
Now, its your turn to help me.... :)
Regards
Girish Sharma

Button Rollover without Layer-based-MENU

Hello everybody !
i want to realize a "rollover-Effect" with a script or anything. I know the great possibilities with the layer-based-menu, but the dvd should run on every player. Do anybody have some tips for me?
Thank you
Greeting
Alex

When you say rollover effect, are you trying to get additional graphics to show up as buttons are selected, or simply illuminate a button as it is rolled over?
Have you read up on button highlight masks? There are limitations, but this method can get images to appear as buttons are selected.

Reference of 103 mat.doc. in 105 doc. , when GR based IV is not selected

Hi,
I required logic, to list out 103 material documents for which movt. 105 is not made , If GR based IV is not selected in PO.
We know, each MIGO document has a reference document number. In case of 103 document, the reference document number is the same number In case of 105 document, the reference docu number is the document number of 103.
But, the reference document number is blank, when GR based IV is not ticked in the Purchase order.
I need some logic to find the reference of 103 document in 105 document for items without GR based IV.
Best Regards
Saravanan

Hi,
Does your PO history had been updated bu the 103 and 105 ? Please check , or the table EKBE,.
Please check table mseg.
Regards,

Reference field from MIRO in PO History

Hi,
The reference field in MIRO has to be displayed in Purchase Order History. For PO's with GR Based IV the field is copied from GR and for PO's without GR based IV it is blank. We want the data from MIRO to be displayed in PO History in the reference field of IR.
Thanks to provide the information regarding the settings for the same.
Regards

Link will help you.
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-mm/miro-couldnt-get-the-gr-number-for-reference-field-in-line-items-3975712

Auto ROP calculated with zero cosumption history

Hi
MRP type = VM - auto re-order point based on the consumption history. there is no consumption history, but after the first MP38 background job run, the ROP got calculated, I checked at MM02, the forecast was the ex post forecast value, I tried to do MP38 manually, it was terminated, and I tried to run forecast from MM02, forecasting view, got error message said there were no historical data.
Question is how the ROP got calculated if I can't even run the forecast with both MP38 and MM02, manually.
Care to share if you come across this before.
Thanks

Hi
Strange error. But I need more information. If you don't see any consumption value in MM02 doesn't mean that there is no consumption. When this material was used? Look in to change history of that material. If period indicator in MRP-3 view is changed, all consumptions will vanish in MM02.Even forecast will not work. It doesn't mean that consumption is done in the past. Check table S033 in se11 for your material without specifying any period and see is there any consumption in past. And check was there any safety stock in present and past. Your problem may get solved. Write to me your findings
Regards
Antony

How do I stop FF from restoring previous session, I've already played with all the options I can find but nothing stops it unless I delete history each time.

Recently, FF has started opening my last tabs when I start a fresh session. I have already checked to make sure that none of the applicable settings are enabled, such as under Options->General: When FF starts "SHOW MY HOMEPAGE" is selected. But for some reason, it opens my last session. The only way I've been able to get it to stop doing this is by having it delete my browsing history after I close the session. I don't want this since I often use my history to re-find information I need for class research. I have made certain that all my settings are the same from before FF started doing this. It only started doing this after the computer was turned off for a long weekend.
I've already searched through the Mozilla help pages and all I can find is how to restore the previous session or similar. I don't want to restore my previous session, I want it to stop restoring my previous session without having to delete my browsing history each time.

Using the instructions here:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Session_Restore#Disabling_crash_recovery
I was able to turn off that feature entirely without having to create a new profile.

Time based disaggregation

Hi All,
The requirement is to dis-aggregate from months to weeks for the current month plus next month, based on last months historical data.
There are two data views
1. having the data in (forecasting is done in this data view)
2. having data in months and weeks. ( last months history is available in weeks and the current & current +1 month in weeks)
The forecast that is in months needs to be disaggregated into weeks for the first 2 months based on last months history.
I have created another KF to copy the last month history into the current and current +1 month in the weekly view.
Also no calendar is defined.
during disaggregation based on the KF the system is throughing unexpected values especially when the last and the next month overlap.
Ex: these are the disaggregated values
W 31.2010 W 32.2010 W 33.2010 W 34.2010 W 35.2010 M 09.2010
3747 2214 2554 3406 14258
here in W35 the value is 14258 which is wrong as the value for M092010 is also added into this week.
Kindly through some light on this weird behavior.
Regards

Hello Nitin,
Sorry to intrude into this old thread that I read with much hope but I find this unanswered as I just happen to post a ditto issue.
Would you recall how this was resolved :-). Pardon if this sounds irritating and unrelated to you know :-)
This is what I asked a while ago
http://scn.sap.com/message/14565886#14565886
My settings for KF1 are P-KF2 and K-KF2 but in my case KF2 has 0 values for some selections (new products). In human language, I am trying to disaggregate an "adjustment" to the statistical forecast that is 0 for new products. The adjustment itself is done in month buckets. Simple solution though is to do the adjustments in weeks but that is like multiplying effort by 5 times.
SAP is doing some dumb thing here as this is a logic of convenience. To me it doesn't appear to be a storage bucket setting issue as I am only expecting a sane result in week buckets and I do have week (and also month) checked in storage bucket profile
Here is what is happening. Hoping some consultant from SAP looks into this and acknowledges this as a bug as I didn't manage to find a note. I will have to grope for key words all night. This is such a common unavoidable scenario.
Step1: System finds the COUNT of week buckets (NOT calendar weeks- just the weeks that FALL in the month) in EACH calendar month separately. E.g. Feb 2014 has 5 weekly buckets, incl.1 partially in Jan and 1 partially in March. The week of 27th Jan 2014 is a “week bucket” for BOTH Jan 2014 and Feb2014.
Step2: It then divides the monthly value of KF1 by the number of weeks in Step1 to calculate EQUAL values per bucket week belonging to respective calendar months, IRRESPECTIVE of whether the week is a WHOLE or PARTIAL week.
Step3: It then simply adds the EQUAL values of resp. week buckets of step1, WHENEVER, the week is spread across months. e.g. In the week beginning 27th Jan 2014, that transcends to next month (Feb 2014), it adds up the results calculated in step2 for W-1 and W+1.
Thanks
BS

Without GR-Based IV, No PO History

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for