Partial delivery without GR Based IV in split valuation scenario

Dear,
We are using split valuation for our materials.
I'm reading on http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/47/61017e49f011d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm the following sentence:
In the case of partial deliveries for a purchase order, you can only valuate each partial delivery separately if goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined in the purchase order (the field GR based IV must be selected on the order item screen). If goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has not been defined, the valuation type that you enter for the first partial delivery is binding for the following partial deliveries.
We have the requirement to valuate partial deliveries separately.
We can however not switch on the GR-based IV flag. The business scenario requires the invoice posting to Goods In Transit to be done before the Goods receipt booking.
Moreover, additional unplanned delivery costs need to be debited to the PO lines after the initial invoice posting, which is not possible in a GR-based IV scenario. (GR quantities can only be invoiced once)
How can I separately valuate partial deliveries without switching on the GR-based IV flag?
Thanks for your swift reply.
Simon

Hi Ravi and Yann,
Thank you for your inputs. OSS note-956083 can not be applied in my case due to the hight system version (patch level 550).
I have already raised this issue to SAP, but in the lack of proper infrastrucure SAP can not access the system. (BASIS guys are still struggling with it)
Well...let me give you recap-
We have not activated nor implemented any BAdi so far (Vanila SRM 5.0 EC scenario) PO creation for goods is working fine and as desired. But when it come across with PO with limit item or services, system throws an error as -
"PO 5100000263: Service-based invoice verif. requires GR "NO" or G R-based invoice verif."
Would deeply appreciate if you guys can share insight on this issue.
Thank you for your assistance!

Similar Messages

Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

Dear experts,
We are starting to use split valuation scenario. Initially we have customize split valuation as standard i.e.
1) Creation of valuation type
2) Creation of valuation category
3) Assignment of cat. and type.
4) Local definition.
5) Assignment of valuation category in material.
6) Extend material with valuation type.
What i have customized and tested is working fine. Recently our user have a requirement that, valuation type field should be available in BOM for their clear understanding. Accordingly we have enhance the BOM screen and added valuation type to be choose by user during BOM creation. exit used PCSD0002.
Now here is issue.-
I have parent X and its child Y with valuation type SKF, BOSCH and NRB. I have fixed/specify valuation type BOSCH in BOM. If we run MRP for the parent, system should have to create purchase requisition for child with only specified valuation type in BOM i.e. with BOSCH in this case.
Note - We cant use default proc. valuation type in customization as customer requirement is frequently changes also user specified that, system must have to select valuation type specified in BOM and create proposals accordingly both for PIR and dependent requirement.
Please suggest.
With best regards,
Manish K. Bachate

Hi
You would be very much able to valuate both the stocks separately with what I have recommended
But, with what you are doing, you wont be able to... Reason being, once you release std cost for the externally procured item, say, 5 USD... It will keep on valuating the item at 5 USD only.. Any price other than 5 invoiced by the vendor would hit the Price diff account OR you will have to revise your std cost every time the vendor changes his price
Ideal way would be to keep price control V in the valuation type "External Proc"... With this, you dont need to release std cost for it and also it would valuate the stock at whatever price supplied by the vendor.. Whether 5 or 6 USD
> To summarize, what I am recommending is this
> 1. Your material in this case will have 3 accounting view... [One parent view and One view for IN HOUSE and one for "External Proc"
> 2. Parent view will have Price control V, IN HOUSE will have S and External Proc has V
> 3. In IMG settings for split valuation, earmark IN HOUSE for internal proc and External Proc for purchase
With this
1. Your IN HOUSE stock will be valuated at std cost released by CK24
2. Your External Proc stock will be valuated at the price supplied by the vendor
Hope this helps!!
Regards
Ajay M

Split valuation - Header Material - Price det. 3 - Matl. ledger active

Hi,
We have split valuation along with Material ledger and Actual costing active.
My client wants to keep price determination 3 / V for Header Material as it defaults 3 / S while creating subbordinate materials i.e., by valuation types.
Per SAP, the requirement is Price determination 2 and Price control is V for Header Material.
My client questions, what is wrong in keeping 3 in Header level?
Do you have any input for this? as I have only answer, as it's the standard configuration and impact unknown.
Ashok

Hi Ashok ,
The materials with split valuation are there in the MM valuation tables MBEW, EBEW, QBEW with the field 'valuation type' BWTAR filled . The header segment (with field valuation type blank) is only for intermal use of the system .
For such materials with valuation type blank (the header segment of material with split valuation) in Material Ledger only the table CKMLPR contains information, the rest of the tables are empty .
The header segment has always price control V. However, the price of the header segment is NOT a moving average price. It is the weighted average price of all valuation types.
Therefore with a Split valuation scenario the materials are recorded in the system with the field BWTAR not blank and with its own price control independently of the header segment
Hence , i think its immaterial of what ever Price Determination you put in Material Master for header material and hence SAP has recommended "2" for the same . Having Price Determination "3" will not have any impact.. i believe...
Regards
Sarada
Edited by: Sarada Sankar Sil on Nov 16, 2010 9:48 AM

Item categories are re-determining based on batch split during delivery

Hello All,
During delivery item categories of bill of materilas are changing based on batch split.
Scenerio: item level bill of materials configured.
Ex: COMPUTER is main item and item category group is LUMP and item category is TAP
but it is relevent for billing as per client requirement
key board, cpu and moniter are bills of materilas item category group is NORM and item category is ZZTA
These above items are relevent for delivery and not relevent for billing
Problem: During batchsplit in delivery item category determining as "TAN" for item category ZZTA
That can be shown when we click on batch split button for sub line item (moniter, cpu) category ZZTA
all batch split line items are copied to billing and getting account determination pricng error because of TAN is relevent for billing
Could you suggest me to prevent the TAN item category for batch split in delivery
Should TAE item category to be maintained for delivery item categories
currently delivery item categories are configured as shown below
del doc type=zlf , item cat. group=lumf, higher level item cat.=tap, No default item catgory
Thanks & Regards

Hi
In the asign item cateogories use usage CHSP (Batch split) for norm and assign default item category as ZZTA. This will get determined your item category when you use batch split.
Spro --> Sales --> Sales document Item --> Assign item categories

STO partial delivery proposal

Hi Experts
In Intercompany STO:
How to enable to delivery proposal while run VL10B ? for partial delivery or complete delivery.
SPRO --> Material Management --> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Set up Stock Transport Order --> Assign Delivery Type and checking Rule: Avilablity Check Rule: C (Delivery proposal) & Checking Rule: B SD Delivery
As above, I have choosen the C Delivery proposal option in config on above path.. However there is no any delivery proposal is being shown to select...
1) Also when there is no stock can i able to control from creating delivery order while VL10B ?
2) Can i make throw error as no stock or what so ever.. ?.
Rgds
RG

Hi,
1) Also when there is no stock can i able to control from creating delivery order while VL10B ?
2) Can i make throw error as no stock or what so ever.. ?.
For the above questions ,, when there is no stock system will not create a delivery document ,rather you can check this at NOTES tab why the dfelivery not created. Sytem itself controls.
As above, I have choosen the C Delivery proposal option in config on above path.. However there is no any delivery proposal is being shown to select...
For the above question , below is the logic of using that field.
Specifies how the system reacts when the availability check finds that the stock quantity is unsufficient to cover the order quantity. The rule also determines the form in which the delivery proposal is specified in the delivery schedule lines.
Use
If the stock quantity is insufficient, the system can react in two ways:
It presents a dialog box and asks you to choose between different options.
It automatically suggests one of the options (no dialog box appears)
The delivery proposal can be specified in the schedule lines in two different ways:
Without entered rule and for the rule 'one-time delivery', user want and delivery proposal are specified in the same schedule line.
For all other rules, user want and delivery proposal are shown in different schedule lines.
Example
On the desired delivery date 11th May, you need the quantity 10.
The availability check for the supplying plant yields the following delivery proposal:
On 11th May, quantity 7 and
On 22nd May, quantity 3.
Without an entered rule and for the rule 'once-only delivery', the system automatically enters only the first partial quantity with the appropriate date from the delivery proposal in the schedule line for the user want:
Delivery date 11th May:
Schedule line quantity 10, confirmed date 22nd May, confirmed quantity 7.
For the rule 'delivery proposal', the system changes only the confirmed date in the schedule line for the user want and automatically transfers both partial quantities to two new schedule lines:
Delivery date 11th May:
Schedule line quantity 10, confirmed date 22nd May, confirmed quantity 0
Delivery date 11th May:
Schedule line quantity 0, confirmed date 11th May, confirmed quantity 7
Delivery date 22nd May:
Schedule line quantity 0, confirmed date 22nd May, confirmed quantity 3
For the rule 'complete delivery', the system changes only the confirmed date in the schedule line for the user want and automatically transfers the complete confirmed quantity to a new schedule line:
Delivery date 11th May:
Schedule line quantity 10, confirmed date 22nd May, confirmed quantity 0
Delivery date 22nd May:
Schedule line quantity 0, confirmed date 22nd May, confirmed quantity 10
For the rule 'selection window in case of shortage', the system displays a dialog box and asks you to choose between the three rules 'once-only delivery', 'delivery proposal', and 'complete delivery'.
Based upon the above write up you can conclude about that how you can switch between partial deliveries.
Regards,

Open Orders Values at partial delivery statuses.

Hello All,
I want to report on Quantities and Amounts for all the Open orders based on different Delivery statuses. I tried to use 2LIS_11_VAITM and 2LIS_11_VASTI. With this I just get the consolidated values at order item level but not the actual break up values at Delivery level.
Can I use 2LIS_11_V_SSL to get the partial delivery statuses and respective quantities?
Thanks and Regards,
Prashanth Reddy

Hi Prashanth,
yes the best way for you is to use the DataSource 2LIS_11_V_SSL. You have here the following status fields: LFGSA (Overall delivery status of the item) and LFSTA (Delivery status) and also the quantities like:
WMENG     Requested Quantity of Sales Order Sched. Lines in Sales Unit
BMENG     Confirmed Quantity of Sales Order Sched. Lines in Sales Unit
VSMNG     Delivered Quantity in Sales Unit of Sales Order Sched. Lines
Only if you need also Open Quantity you have to use a combination of two DataSources in one ODS Object. As example 2LIS_11_V_SCL. Here you will find the field OLFMNG (Open quantity to be delivered).
You have to consolidate the both in one ODS object with the same key figures and both should update different InfoObjects.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Natalia

Partial Delivery Per Item Setting Not Effective

Hi,
Any help greatly appreciated.
We have a business requirement whereby sales orders may be partially shipped but the sales order lines themselves MUST be shipped complete.
Therefore we have set the customer master record accordingly ie Partial Delivery Per Item = C ( Only complete delivery allowed)
This setting is indeed copied into the sales order but the availability check seems to ignore it. Instead it proposes a delivery schedule ie 100 qty del tomorrow, balance in 2 weeks.
I would expect that the availability WOULD NOT split the qty like this instead propose the complete qty in 2 weeks.
I could probably get round this by making the message an error during delivery creation, but I would really like the sales order to behave as expected and make an intelligent 'promise'
Am I missing something somewhere?
Please help.
Regards
Guy

Hi,
You can try the following setting;
In SPRO -> SD -> Basic functions -> availability check and TOR -> Availabity check -> Availability check with ATP logic or against planning -> Define default settings. The t.code is OVZJ.
Here for your sales area, under Availabitlity check rule column, you can assign value B and try.
Regards,

Invoice status is "Closed" after posting from Partial Delivery Notes

Hi everyone,
My add-on posts PARTIAL draft documents to posted delivery notes without reference to a Sales Order up to invoices. I've noticed that after invoice posting, my document (invoice) status was closed while my delivery notes document is open. Should'nt my invoice status still open? Please tell me if I am missing something on my code below. Thanks in advance!
public SAPbobsCOM.Documents PostDeliveryReceipts(SAPbobsCOM.Company company, SAPbobsCOM.Documents draft, ref int result)
SAPbobsCOM.Documents delivery = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oDeliveryNotes);
delivery.HandWritten = SAPbobsCOM.BoYesNoEnum.tYES;
delivery.DocDate = draft.ShipmentDate;
 delivery.DocDueDate = draft.ShipmentDate;
 delivery.CardCode = draft.CardCode;
 delivery.CardName = draft.CardName;
 delivery.NumAtCard = draft.NumAtCard;
 delivery.DocType = SAPbobsCOM.BoDocumentTypes.dDocument_Items;
for (int i = 0; i <= draft.Lines.Count - 1; i++)
 draft.Lines.SetCurrentLine(i);
 //components of a bom
 if (draft.Lines.TreeType != SAPbobsCOM.BoItemTreeTypes.iIngredient)
delivery.Lines.ItemCode = draft.Lines.ItemCode;
 delivery.Lines.Quantity = draft.Lines.Quantity;
 delivery.Lines.WarehouseCode = draft.Lines.WarehouseCode;
 delivery.Lines.VatGroup = draft.Lines.VatGroup;
 delivery.Lines.UnitPrice = draft.Lines.UnitPrice;
 if (i != draft.Lines.Count)
 delivery.Lines.Add();
return delivery;

hello, friend.
in addition to what the others have said, please check your customer master, particularly in the Sales Area Data > Shipping tab. look at the partial deliveries. there may have been settings that tell the system if a delivery has been created with reference to the sales order, the order will be completed even if the quantity is only partially delivered. if the entry in the 'partial delivery per item' field is 'B', then this will explain your situation.
this can also be manually set in the sales order, so you have to take a look at the order as well, at item level.
regards.

Creation of Inbound delivery without Order acknowledgment

Hi,
We have a scenario where we raise Purchase order to Vendor. The Vendor sent the confirmation (Delivery date, qty, etc) via IDOC. This updates the Order acknowledgement and also the confirmation information in PO.
When the Vendo creates a Outbound delivery in this system, it sends another IDOC which creates a Inbound delivery automatically in my system.
In some cases the confirmation IDoc fails. We want that in such case the Inbound delivery should be created unless we get the correct confirmation.
In other words, system should not create Inbound delivery if order acknowledgement fails.
Is this possible in standard SAP

Hi,
What is the reason for not generating inbound delivery without a confirmation? Wouldn't the business on receiving plant be interested in getting inbound delivery asap, so that they can plan their operations based on the incoming goods details?
I don't think you can control that simply from confirmation control key. There is the 'expected sequence' but it does not stop the process if you proceed without confirmation.
Note that there are lots of other complications if there was such a requirement. What if first item is fully confirmed, but another is not. Would you like to create inbound delivery only for the confirmed item?
And what for Scheduling Agreements? The confirmations/inbound deliveries are at item level only (and not at delivery schedule line). So you don't fully control what quantities were confirmed and which are still 'open' for confirmation.
If you want to apply such a logic, then most probably custom solution at inb. delivery creation would be required.
Regards,
Dominik Modrzejewski

How to do the Partial delivery for configurable material ?

Hi All,
I am creating a sales order for a configurable material and is trying to do the partial delivery for the same. But, after the outbound delivery the status of the sales order is shown as completed although I have done the partial delivery.
Here are the steps I followed.
1. material I used here is a configurable material.
Main settings.
a. In Basic Data tab, marked as configurable
b. Procurement type='E' in MRP 2 tab
c. Strategy group as 82 in MRP 3 view.
2. I created a sales order for quantity 10
3. Created a production order followed by goods Movement thereby increasing the stock.
4. Did the outbound delivery for quantity 5.
Now if I checked for the status of the sales order using VA02, the status for the line item as well as for the sales order was "Completed" although I had done partial delivery.
I have checked for setting in Customer master record, item category in VOV7. Everything seems to be fine.
I checked for all the information in the FORUM without any help.
Can you please help me?
Kind Regards,
Anupama

Hi,
For Info, I am creating a sales order for Item category TAC.
1. In my case, after completing the partial delivery, in the document flow for Order, the status is shown as completed.
2. In status overview for this item, delivery status indicator is set as 'Fully delivered'.
I did check in the customer master record and the field
Partial delivery per item is set to Blank( Partial delivery allowed)
3. I did run the report RIBELF20 and I am getting this error for all the sales order I created for partial delivery for configurable material.
For Normal item, the status is showing properly.
Is there any other settings I have to check?
I needed this to be working. Please help

Unable to update purchase order after partial delivery

bold Issue:
After upgrading from v2005 > v2007:
1) We created a PO with two different purchase items :
row 1: 10 pcs Item x
row 2: 15 pcs item Y
2) create a Goods Receipt PO based on the PO row 2 (15 pcs Item Y) so this row will be closed in the PO.
3) after saving the GRPO item Y is set as a non purchase item (deselected the tick box "Purchase Item" on the Item master), because the supplier will not be able to deliver this item again.
4) After changing item Y, we want to update the amount of Item X to for example 11 (instead of 10). This item is still a purchase item > while updating the PO the following error appears:
[Purchase Order - Rows - Item No.][line: 2] , 'The item is not a purchase item (2)' [Message 131-10]
In v2005 it was possible to follow the above procedure, however since the upgrade of v2007 the error appears.
The problem is that that it happens very often that the suppliers change the items, so they cannot be delivered anymore.
bold Below the response of SAP Support:
Line: -
Yes, I understand what you mean that the item you want to deliver is the other item PQ which is still a purchase item. However, the system does the checking based on document level, and not filtering only per Open rows. Hence, even if the item for B8 is fully closed, the system still detects that there is a non-purchase item in an open document (B8).
In order to update the other item PQ, please set the item B8 back to Purchase Item. Once the Sales Order is updated, you may update B8 again to Non Purchase.
If the possibility of using the 'Active/Inactive' button is not possible, another workaround is to use a User Define Field to flag the item. For example, you can set it as 'Y', when the supplier stopp ed selling the item. Then, in the Item Search window, you can filter the records to group those items that are set as 'Y' and the rest as 'N'. Only those 'N' items can be used when placing orders.
As an added procedure, you can generate an approval procedure that will be triggered when an item that is set as 'Y' in the User Defined field is added in the Purchase Order. When the approval is trig gered, the user can then re-verify the items added and make the necessary changes before saving the purchase document.
I hope the above workaround is suitable. I agree with the expected logic, but per Note937297, the stock status of an item is not meant to be changed after documents are added in the system. It seems a limitation in the current system.
Line: -
bold Solution:
The system should check if the open row can be delivered, since it still is a purchase item.
The provided workarounds are not an option for our customer, so we are looking forward to a positive reaction!
Kind regards,
Charlotte

Unable to update purchase order after partial delivery
Issue:
After upgrading from v2005 > v2007:
1) We created a PO with two different purchase items :
row 1: 10 pcs Item x
row 2: 15 pcs item Y
2) create a Goods Receipt PO based on the PO row 2 (15 pcs Item Y) so this row will be closed in the PO.
3) after saving the GRPO item Y is set as a non purchase item (deselected the tick box "Purchase Item" on the Item master), because the supplier will not be able to deliver this item again.
4) After changing item Y, we want to update the amount of Item X to for example 11 (instead of 10). This item is still a purchase item > while updating the PO the following error appears:
[Purchase Order - Rows - Item No.][line: 2] , 'The item is not a purchase item (2)' [Message 131-10]
In v2005 it was possible to follow the above procedure, however since the upgrade of v2007 the error appears.
The problem is that that it happens very often that the suppliers change the items, so they cannot be delivered anymore.
Below the response of SAP Support:
Yes, I understand what you mean that the item you want to deliver is the other item PQ which is still a purchase item. However, the system does the checking based on document level, and not filtering only per Open rows. Hence, even if the item for B8 is fully closed, the system still detects that there is a non-purchase item in an open document (B8).
In order to update the other item PQ, please set the item B8 back to Purchase Item. Once the Sales Order is updated, you may update B8 again to Non Purchase.
If the possibility of using the 'Active/Inactive' button is not possible, another workaround is to use a User Define Field to flag the item. For example, you can set it as 'Y', when the supplier stopp ed selling the item. Then, in the Item Search window, you can filter the records to group those items that are set as 'Y' and the rest as 'N'. Only those 'N' items can be used when placing orders.
As an added procedure, you can generate an approval procedure that will be triggered when an item that is set as 'Y' in the User Defined field is added in the Purchase Order. When the approval is trig gered, the user can then re-verify the items added and make the necessary changes before saving the purchase document.
I hope the above workaround is suitable. I agree with the expected logic, but per Note937297, the stock status of an item is not meant to be changed after documents are added in the system. It seems a limitation in the current system.
Solution:
The system should check if the open row can be delivered, since it still is a purchase item.
The provided workarounds are not an option for our customer, so we are looking forward to a positive reaction!
Kind regards,
Charlotte

Split valuation based on stor. loc.

Dear Guru,
Please guide me how may I configure split valuation based on stor. loc. My company in multi level marketing (MLM). We have stor at Brunei as well. Our business set different price if any stocks parked at Brunei stor. loc.
Exp: Material A - RM1 at M'sia stor loc.
- if this material transfered to Brunei branch, it should calculate as RM1.50
- so stor. loc. should shows different valuation
I need to configure this for existing material. Bus. use PO, GR & IR for this procurement.Please assist me guru.
rgds,
nantha

Hi,
Valuation category is used if you want to have a split valuation i.e. you have an option of differentiating partial stocks of material according to particular criteria & handling them differently regarding valuation within a plant.
Why Required? : 1)Your valuation of Brunei & M'sia may be different
Following configuration reqd.
1)In global setting we have to define Valuation category( Say storage Location) & Valuation type( Brunei & M'sia
2) Active split valuation in MM
3) Assign valuation type to category in customizing
5) In Material Master enter valuation category in accounting view & choose price control V
6) Extend Material Master view for both valuation type
7) valuation category to be active /assign for plant
8) In local definition Define Valuation category to Valuation area.
Then for every transaction (Valuation relevant) may be GR, GI, and Phy. Inventory you must mention valuation type during transaction to get your material valuated separately.
By this u will able to map your requireemnt & able to valuate diffrently.
Vivek

Combining 2 Sales Orders - 'Complete' with 'Partial' Delivery into 1 Delv

Hi folks,
I have a typical requirement from my client and it is as follows:
My client want to combine 'Sales Orders' marked with 'Complete Delivery' indicator(VBAK-AUTLF check-box is checked) at the Header -> Shipping, with Sales Orders marked for 'Partial Delivery' (VBAK-AUTLF is not checked) in the Header-> Shipping.
Although all the other business conditions/fields values at the Header levels,like Ship-To_party, Shipping Conditions, Incoterms, etc. are same across both these Sales Orders; SAP as a standard Business Process Flow, doesnot allow COMBINING of 2 such orders into a SINGLE Delivery, since their 'Headers' seem to differ for that ONE field value.
I have searched through all user-exits, SAP Help forums as well as OSS notes to get a solution to this problem but could not find any (bad luck).
Will anyone of you who has come across this particular scenario or know a way to get around this problem, be able to contribute with his/her ideas? I would be
grateful, thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shripad

Hi iim nava,
Thanks for your reply.
However in our case, the system does throw that error, when i try to combine the second order (partial) into the delivery created for the first order (complete).Here is the log for your reference, when I try to add the second(partial so items) into the delivery created for the first (complete delivery SO):
Diagnosis
 Item 000010 cannot be shipped in the same delivery with the
 other items in the document because the header data (AUTLF)
 is different. The field AUTLF for the item has the value &4,
 yet in the delivery it has X.
System Response
 The system issues this message if a delivery split is
 necessary.
 This message either appears in the collective processing log
 or during creation of outbound deliveries from projects or
 for subcontracting. It informs you that the item specified
 will be shipped in a delivery other than the delivery that
 includes the other items from the same document. If there was
 a general problem with shipment of the delivery, a different
 message appears.
 If this message appears when you are creating an outbound
 delivery with reference to a sales order in the foreground,
 it indicates that the order item cannot be shipped with the
 current outbound delivery.
By any chance, did you actually try simulating my scenario in your system. If you have and the same works fine in your system, then pls help me by sending your 'copy control' settings, to help me compare. We run SAP 4.6 and my settings for copy control are as follows:
LF <-> OR (Header):
 Data Transfer (VBAK) = 001 [HEADER]
 Data Transfer HU = 000 [blank]
 Order Requirements (VBAK) = 001 [HEADER]
 Combination Requirements = 651 [051 w/o Comp dlv]
LF <-> OR <-> TAN (Item):
 Item Data = 101 [ITEM]
 Order Requirements (VBAK) = 101 [ITEM]
 Business Data = 2 [BUSINESS DATA]
 Buss Data Reqmt = 151 [COMBINATION]
Hope the feedback can you will help me solve my problem. Thanks once again.
Regards,
Shripad

Partial delivery SO status became completed

Dear All,
I faced the following problem:
1. SO was created for 10 pcs
2. Via SO reference a delivery doc was created for 5 pcs
3. WM-TO was created and PGI was executed
4. The status of SO item became completed
What is the reason? I checked VTLA > document flow update is set. No partial delivey indicators are maintained in SO and customer master (the field is blank).
I'd like to ask you to please help if you can.
Thanks,
Csaba

Dear All,
I'd like to ask to please help in this issue.
I tested the same without WM and in case of partial delivery I faced the same problem: the status of the sales order becomes completed.
1. SO created for 2 pcs (VA01)
2. Delivery document created for 1 pc (VL01N)
3. Picking (w/o WM!) was done (VL01N) > 'Pick status' & 'Overall pick status' become 'C'; 'Pick confirmation' Picking/putaway confirmation' become 'C' (delivery document, 'Status overview' tab)
The result is that SO becomes 'Completed'.
If I delete the picked qty from 'Pick qty' field (VL02N, delivery doc 'Picking' tab) and I save the result:
1. 'Pick status' & 'Overall pick status' become 'A'; 'Pick confirmation' Picking/putaway confirmation' remain 'C' (delivery document, 'Status overview' tab)
2. After saving the above mentioned change SO document remains completed.
(Please consider no GI took place!!!)
If I delete the item from Delivery doc, SO becomes open (not delivered - don't know exactly what is the proper expression since I1m not in english environment) again - so it seems something is wrong with picking...
Thanks,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 23, 2008 9:59 AM

Partial Delivery should not go for credit hold.

Hi All,
When we are creating Partial delivery it is going on credit hold. I want the solution for this so that credit check does not happen at Delivery level.
Please find the OVA8 settings Mentained below.
Check                   Reaction      Status/Block
Dynamic                   C                 Checked               Horizon   15 T
NextReviewDate         A                 Checked              Number of Days      30
Open Item                 C                 Checked              Max.Open.tem %    10   NoDays openI   15
OldestOpenitem         A                 Checked              Days oldestItem     120
Please suggest for the same.
Thanks

Hi,
Partial delivery is a exclusion scenario. For this, we have to use credit check user exits. Detailed documentation of the user exit for credit managment is given below. This will help you to achieve solution.
We can write logic based on VBAP & LIPS table delivered quantity details.
User Exits For Credit Checks And Risk Management
Credit Check
If you want to carry out your own individual credit checks, that differ from those in the standard system, you must define them in the following user exits:
LVKMPTZZ
LVKMPFZ1: USER_CREDIT_CHECK1
LVKMPFZ2: USER_CREDIT_CHECK2
LVKMPFZ3: USER_CREDIT_CHECK3
User exit for availability check
User exit USEREXIT_AVAIL_CHECK_CREDIT exists in Include MV45AFZF.
This user exit allows you to determine whether the system should or should not carry out an availability check after a blocked document has been released or after a new credit check
Regards,
Shabeer

Partial delivery without GR Based IV in split valuation scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for