[WM] Putaway strategy for bulk storage type SU-managed

Hi Gurus,
I need your help
I have a Bulk storage type with SU-managed. I would undestand the real behaviour of putaway strategy B.
1) Case 1: assume that in bulk storage type there are the followed bins (rows):
- in bin XX1 there is material AAA
- Bin XX2 is empty
In this situation if i receive material AAA, putaway strategy B chooses the bin XX1 by background processing - correct!
2) Case 2: assume that in bulk storage type there are the followed bins (rows):
- In Bin XX1 there is material AAA
- in Bin XX2 there is material AAA
- in Bin XX3 there is material AAA
In this situation if i receive material AAA, i don't undestand the behaviour of putaway strategy B. Seems that the system chooses in random way the bin (XX1, XX2 and XX3).
P.S: the storage unit type is one of default - E1.
Can you help me?
Thank very much

You told
Addn to Stock: X
Block upon placement: empty
Then How can you have Case 2?
In Bin XX1 there is material AAA
Next time also stock goes to XX1 only not XX2 unless you overwrite manually.
What does your block strage structure looks like? i'm sorry but i don't undestand your question.
Go to OMM4 "Define-Block struct." and look No. SUs for your St. bin type, SUT & Bulk stor Ind.

Similar Messages

Putaway strategy for rack storage and floor

HI
we have define one warehouse room as One Storage Type. its rack storage . Storage unit
managed . in each storage bin one Su (pallet) can be placed. Some times we keep stocks (on pallets) on the floor
(Pallets in one layer). No of Pallets(SU) is defined at that floor, say 100 pallets can be placed on the floor.
we need Capacity check method = 2 (Check based on palletization accord. to SUT 1).
Which Putaway strategy should be applied for this storage type.? considering 1 bin = 1 pallet and Pallets on the floor.
thanks & regards
thomas

Hi Hein
yes, creating seperate storage type for racking and floor is a solution.
but if we want to keep it as whole room as One Storage type.
what you think about putaway strategy "P" Pallet putaway strategy. if we consider floor as speerate BIN TYPE and define BIN TYPE and SUT permitted . And Allowed SU in that BIN TYPE.
your opnion please.
thanks & best regards
Thomas

LT03 for Bulk Storage Types

Dear SAP-Experts,
we use ECC 6.0 with WM. First we create an outbound delivery with VL10a/VL01N, after that we create the TOs with the LT03. We are using storage units(SU) and one SU is one palett. When we create an outbound delivery with 2 paletts the system only created 1 TO. But I need 2 TOs. Is there something to change in the customizing? Should I use an User Exit?
A picture what the system is doing with a bulk storage type:
But this is what I need:
Thanks a lot.
Walter

Hi Walter,
I have never used the split profile in Bulk storage type earlier however i used TO split for other storage type and it works fine for me and i hope the same should work for bulk also. find below the setting which is required to define the TO Split
From the below node select --Define Profile
Define the profile for Performance Data
Select Profile for Transfer order splitting
Sort profile for TO splitting
in my opinion VLENR should work for you however there are multiple option available you can click on the match code button and have a look for other parameter
Define the movement type,Source storage type , Destination storage type and Profile for the TO split which was define in the above steps

How to find bulk storage type

hi,
i have working on blocking bins in bulk storage type in LX05, i didnt able to find out the bulk storage type out of my all types.
how to figure out the bulk storage type out of all types.
regards
muthuraman.d

Hi
check
SPRO>Logistics Execution>Warehouse Management>Master Data>Define Storage Type
In that for Bulk storage type the putaway strategy will be 'B'(Bulk storage)
You can also check in
SPRO>Logistics Execution>Warehouse Management>Storage Units>Strategies>Define Bulk Storage Area
Regards
Amuthan M
Edited by: Amuthan M on Feb 2, 2010 10:22 AM

SUT and Bin type Bulk storage type

Hi experts,
In cofiguration i have defined for particular storage type, bin type & SUT as 10 HU's per bin. But while doing putaway system has allowed 11 HU's. Kindly explain me how it is happened?
Regards
Maria
Edited by: Maria on Mar 15, 2011 6:53 PM
Edited by: Maria on Mar 15, 2011 7:08 PM

Hi,
Is your placement strategy for the storage type "B"? Is the factor of the stacks x stack height = No of SU's?
Regards,
Hein

Zero stock check for a bulk storage type

Hi Experts,
We have a requirement to do the zero stock check for a bulk storage type. As a standard SAP it is not allowed to do the zero stock check for a bulk storage type. Is there any way to do this?
Thanks & Regards
Sanpan

Hi Sanpan
I am in a similar boat.
We have a Bulk warehouse with storage types with 'B' putaway strategy. We would also like to instigate zero stock check but get the message Zero stock check not supported in bulk storage areas with storage units
Message no. LT246
Did you find a solution to this? Or have you coded a solution?
Many thanks
Adam.

Replenishment From SU Managed Bulk Storage Type

Hi Experts,
We are trying to implement Immediate TO Creation Random Bin Management from a SU Managed Bulk Storage Type.
Our scenario is the following:
We have a SU Managed Bulk Stype: Stype 702
We have a SU Managed Stype with Putaway Strategy "P": Stype 701
We have material 11000026 and we define the following in WM View 2:
Max Qt: 6000
Min Qt: 2000
Replenishment Qt: 3000
Whenever a delivery TO from 701 is confirmed, and the stock level of material 11000026 in SType 701 drops below the Min. Qt, we need the system to immediately generate a replenishment TO: 3000 kg from Source SType 702 to Destination SType 701.
So far we have done the following:
Created a WM.Mov.Type 721, for which Manual TO creation is not allowed and with Ref.Stor.type Search 721.
We defined Replenishment Control for SType 701: with Replenishment Mov.Type 721 and Replenishment Technique 2.
Created SType Indicator with Operation A and Ref.Stor.type Search 721; in the sequence the first and only SType is Stype 702.
We assigned the SType Indicator to Material in WM View 1.
Whenever we actually confirm a delivery TO from 701 and the stock level drops below the min Qt., the system is not generating the immediate TO. What is the correct configuration or how can I achieve our request?
(The configuration described above works perfectly between STypes that have both the same Putaway Strategy, "P")
Thank you,
Leonidas Oyaga

Hi Mihailo,
Just tried running Tx. LT0R. I get Error Message No. L3009: "no destination storage bin to be found in storage type 701."
(Before doing this, I deleted ID Point 711 from SType 701).
I believe the issue is related to the relationship between SU Managed Bulk SType (702) and SType 701. In 702 stock in a storage bin can be identified based on the SU. However, when creating the TR or OT the system is not able to find a destination storage bin because the quantity taken from a storage bin in 702 is greater than the max quantity allowed in a single storage bin in 701. As if when picking the quantities it is trying to deliver the whole quantity to a single storage bin instead of transfering each SU (1000 KG per SU) to a different storage bin.
For Instance:
Material 11000026 Stype 701
Min Qt: 2000
Max Qt: 6000
Replenishment Qt: 4000
Storage Bin Capacity in 701: 1000
When stock level drops belowe Min. Qt, and the system tries to do replenishment from 702 by delivering 4000, the system is not able to find a storage bin in storage type 701 because it excedes the storage bin capacity.
Best Regards,
Leonidas Oyaga

User Exit for Put Away for multiple storage type

Hi All ,
we are using the exit EXIT_SAPML03T_002 for doing some capacity calculation and bin selection while doing a put away process in Ware house .
now i want to have two different type of storage types
say
A and B ,
if their are no empty bins in storage type A , then as per storage section search strategy the material should go in B storage type.
Both the storage type has next empty bin search strategy with user exit activated.
The difference between the two storage type is their individual capacity which is maintained in a custom table .
I am facing the problem that the exit is getting triggered only once .
ie. it will check for storage type A if the criteria is not met at a later stage while bin allocation , the system is not triggering the exit for B storage type .
do i need to do all validation and possibilities of not getting placed in storage type A in the exit . or does this exit will trigger for each storage type as per strategy if for any reason the stock is not placed in the previous storage type ?

Hi Experts
Thanks for the response,
As i tested for the 561 movement (initial upload) we need to do the put away manually.
So the system will not suggest Full qty to move to one Bulk and partial to different.
But for normal Goods receipt process the goods will be automatically placed to different storage type
based on the search strategy and in the Bulk structure we need to unchek the partial pallet allowed.
If anybody has difference pls revert
Regards
Depin

Processed TRs to be deleted from LB10(display TRs list for a storage type)

Dear all
Is it possible to delete already processed transfer requirements for a storage type in Transaction LB10?
Please guide me

Use LB02 as below:
Choose Logistics ® Logistics Execution ® Internal Warehouse Processes ® Transfer Requirement ® Change from the SAP menu.
Enter the warehouse number and the transfer requirement number. You can also enter the number of the item you want to delete.
From the initial screen, you have several options.
- To delete a transfer requirement, access the header screen by selecting Header. Then choose Transfer Requirement ® Delete from the Change Header menu bar.
- To delete one or more transfer requirement items, choose List of changes to access the screen where all the items are listed.
Choose Enter.
The system displays a list of all transfer requirement items.
- Select the items that you want to delete in the D column. To delete the items, choose Enter.
- You can also access a list of all transfer requirement items by choosing Item overview. Select the item to be deleted (for example, by moving the cursor to the item) from the list and choose Edit ® Delete item from the menu bar.
Regardless of the option you have chosen, the system displays a confirmation window.
To confirm the deletion, choose Yes.
If you have selected several items, the system displays a confirmation window for each item.
If the item is the only one in the transfer requirement, the system displays another window in which you confirm that you want to delete the transfer requirement

How to restrict the material for speific storage type

Dear all,
i am maintained the X - material to 001 warehouse and 001 rack storage type when i try to create TO for putaway process it will allow me some other storage type like open,shelf....as per my client requirement it should not be .....
i am using manual strategy for putaway proces ....kindly guide me....
Thanks
Muthuraman.D

Hi,
The storage types during Putaway are proposed based on the strategy defined.
Change the stcok placement indicator in WM view 1.
If you have a storage type search strategy defined that matches your requirement, then maintain the same in WM view 1 for the material
Hope this helps
regards

Putaway strategy for mixed pallets

Hi guys,
I need your suggestion to determine the correct putaway strategy. This is the scenario: We have a rack which will stock mixed pallets (more than one material) in the same bin. We want the same behavior of the putaway strategy I u201CAddition to existing stocku201D. In order to control the capacity of the bins Iu2019ve configure the Capacity check method 4 u201CUsage check based on materialu201D and try to control the capacity by volume, however, this measure is not realistic because in a pallet exist a lot of space that will not be consume by the material (in this case, books).
Example:
1 Pallet = 1.000 CM3
1 Book = 1 CM3
Consume of material = 1
Bin capacity = 1000
In this case, de capacity check will let stock 1.000 UN of material in the bin, but the true is that one pallet could only contain 700 UN.
I try to get the consume materialu2019s amount dividing the bin capacity by the total quantity of a pallet (Consume of material = 1000 / 700) but this could only works for NOT mixed palletsu2026
A possible solution is the Pallet strategy, but I have the same error. You define the pallet quantity at material level, so I have the same problem for the mixed pallets. Can I indicate the system which materials will go together before the TO creation?
Any suggestion will be really appreciated!
Sebas

Hi Hein
yes, creating seperate storage type for racking and floor is a solution.
but if we want to keep it as whole room as One Storage type.
what you think about putaway strategy "P" Pallet putaway strategy. if we consider floor as speerate BIN TYPE and define BIN TYPE and SUT permitted . And Allowed SU in that BIN TYPE.
your opnion please.
thanks & best regards
Thomas

Storage Type Search for Multiple Storage Types

Hello experts.
I have an issue that I cannot seem to resolve.
Background
- We are using kanban strategy 0006 in order to move materials from Plant A to Plant B. Plant A is warehouse-managed but Plant B is not.
- Within Plant A we have one wm-managed Storage Location with many Storage Types.
- Within Plant B we have two Storage Locations ( each one representing a separate, physical building ).
- A majority of the kanban materials in use only have one Supply Area assigned to them. However we have approximately 15 materials that have multiple Supply Areas assigned to them. This is because these materials are common parts across two different Storage Locations in Plant B. As a result, they also have two different Storage Types assigned to them in Plant A ( the source of the material ).
Problem
Because we have common materials in two different Storage Types, the Storage Type Search (defined in OMLY) does not always return the correct Storage Type for the Stock Removal Strategy.
I understand that this occurs because the Storage Type Search is defined based upon the Warehouse Number, Removal/Putaway Indicator and the Storage Strategy. Therefore both Storage Types will use the same Storage Type Search when determining the Destination Storage Type for the transfer order.
FYI, here's an example :
- Material 123ABC is defined in Plant A, Storage Location SL00, Warehouse WH1 with Storage Types ST1 and ST2.
- Material 123ABC is defined in Plant B, Storage Locations SL01 and SL02.
- Material 123ABC has Supply Area SA1 for Storage Location SL01 and Supply Area SA2 for Storage Location SL02 defined for kanban.
- Material 123ABC has Stock Removal Strategy 003 assigned in the WM1 view for Plant A, Storage Location SL00 and Warehouse WH1.
- The Storage Type Search sequence defined for Stock Removal Strategy 003 is Storage Location SL01 then Storage Location SL02.
- When I execute kanban for Material 123ABC for Supply Area SA2, the Destination Storage Type for the transfer order should be ST2. However because the Storage Type Search is based upon the Warehouse (and not the Storage Type level), the Destination Storage Type for the transfer order is ST1 because it is the first item in the Storage Type Search sequence.
So my question : does anybody know how I can resolve this issue? We don't want to adjust our master data for these materials or supply areas. Is there a USER_EXIT that we can implement that will account for this condition?

Hi Mathew,
Based on the storage location indicator you can maintan different storage types for picking and putaway. I think your scnario willl be addressed using this indicator.Please explore this option before going for User exits.

LT03 - Force storage bin assignment for bulk storage area

Hi experts,
I know... why use a bulk storage area if you want to manage storage bin?! I don't know!
But this is the problem, in LT03 I need to assign a value to the VLENR field (storage bin) but this value is lost in recap and in the flow.
I've try various exit but never able to export this value.
I've try with BADI WM_ENHANCMENT but is only provided for SAP internal use.
Could you help me please?
Anima

VLENR is not a storage bin number but a storage unit number (SU), so it is meant to be used if your storage type (from which you pick) is SU-managed (see SPRO - storage types definitions, T331-LENVW = 'X').
If you want to influence the way the system chooses the storage bin to pick from, you can use customer-exit MWMTO004 ("Own stock removal strategy").
regards

Putaway strategy for bin

Hi SAP Guru
I have an issue in my WMS setup.
I currently assigned Storage Type XXX for palletization. PUTAWAY STRAT : P
Mixed Storage : X
Addition to Stock : X
In the master Data setup i have input the palletization information already under SUT IP.
For Material X = 100 GM for each pallet ( IP)
For Material Y = 200 GM for each pallet ( IP)
For each storage bin i have dividied into 4 sections ( or quants )
so bascially naming convention will be like this
C11000 / 1
C11000 / 2
C11000 / 3
C11000 / 4
Now the issue is, when I create a TO for material X ( 10GM) , the system will automatically propose the bin.
The system will assign the material to bin C11000 / 1
If i create another TO for material X (5GM) different batch, the system will automatically propose the bin
The system will assign material X to bin C11000 / 2.
IF i create TO for material Y ( 10GM )
The system will assign material Y to bin C11000 / 3.
Should the system fill in C11000 / 1 before moving on to C11000 / 2 and so on?

Thanks alot , it was alot of help.
Is there a way , where I can divide the bin in to 4 pallet?
I understand you can use the capacity usage check at bin level.
It would be nice if you could comment on the logic I have with how this work.
Material X is palletized ( WM2 ) , 10000GM = IP
Material Y is palletized ( WM2) , 20000GM = IP
I have activated Cap Check for storage type XXX with 5
I have enter the LET capacity usage for SUT ( OMM1) as 1
For the bin master data, i have put the capacity usage as 4.
So bascially the effect will be, for Material X , i can putaway 40000GM of goods into this bin
Material Y can putaway 80000GM of goods into this bin
The bin can handle 20000GM of Material X and 40000GM of Material Y ( Mixed storage )
Thanks for the help !

Strategy for selecting Storage Unit for Transfer Order Creation

Hi ppl,
I need to understand what strategy is used by SAP to determine the storage unit while creating a transfer order for delivery using transaction LT03.
It seems that the system selects the SU randomly, but, in the backend, there should be some strategy.
Please let me know how to find this.
Regards.

Hi,
Check the storage type indicator assignment value in the stock removal field in the material master Warehouse management1 tab.
Then go to SPRO->Logistics Execution ->Warehouse management->Strategies -> stock removal startegies. Check the stock removal strategies for the warehouse and storage type (from material master) data. From this data you can understand the details on system proposals.
Regards

[WM] Putaway strategy for bulk storage type SU-managed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for