WMS proposed storage bin
Dear Gurus,
We have configured our WMS successfully with FIFO enabled environment. Now we are implementing barcode and we are interested to get issuance storage bin which is WMS proposing for issuance. Is there any BAPI for which we can determine storage bin for a material from which system will issue after posting.
Regards,
FR
I have written my own BAPI to get required results so problem resolved.
Regards,
FR
Similar Messages
-
Get proposed Storage bin before do Transfer Order
Hi all,
Do you know any FM to get the storage bin proposed by standard in LT06 when you do the Transfer order manually?
I am using L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT but I think I don't have to use that. The case is that:
1- we are proposing to the user the storage bin recovered from L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT
2- when user press a button TO is created like LT06. It is failing with "Available storage bin is 0". But if we go out from our Z screen and we do that by standard LT06 it is working fine so I think our call to L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT is changing maybe some global variables which are doing that when the TO is going to be created it fails.
Do you have any idea how to get the storage bin? (MARD-LGBPE is not valid because it will not be informed there)
Regards,
ManelWe are still using this FM to get the storage bin. The problem is that LQUAY structure is blocked after the call so we need to dequeue LQUAY before to create the TO
-
About FM to propose storage bin
Hi Experts,
My scenario is: Given source storage unit #, Material #, quantity, try to use 'L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT' to propose destination storage unit # and bin. This is to simulate transaction LT01. The problem is when I tested this FM, I got error message: "Storage Unit ... is not consistent with other transfer order data". However, with same test data, running transaction LT01 can propose destination storage unit# and bin.
Could you please see below codes and find if there is any problems of parameters filled before calling L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT ?
Thanks.
data: I_LTAK type LTAK,
I_LTAP type LTAP,
I_MLVS type MLVS,
I_MGEF type MGEF,
I_RL03A type RL03A,
I_T333 type T333,
I_T334T type T334T,
I_T340D type T340D,
E_LTAP type LTAP,
E_REDUZ like RL03T-REDUZ,
T_LPROT type standard table of LPROT,
T_LMESS type standard table of LMESS.
i_ltak-lgnum = 'CLK'.
i_ltak-bwlvs = '999'.
i_ltap-matnr = w_matnr. "Material#
i_ltap-werks = '1000'.
i_ltap-lgort = '0001'.
i_ltap-charg = w_charg. "Batch
i_ltap-letyp = 'F1'.
i_rl03a-anfme = w_gesme. "quantity
i_ltap-vlenr = w_vlenr. "Source Storage Unit#
call function 'L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT'
EXPORTING
I_LTAK = I_LTAK
I_LTAP = I_LTAP
I_MLVS = I_MLVS
I_MGEF = I_MGEF
I_RL03A = I_RL03A
I_T333 = I_T333
I_T334T = I_T334T
I_T340D = I_T340D
IMPORTING
E_LTAP = E_LTAP
E_REDUZ = E_REDUZ
TABLES
T_LPROT = T_LPROT
T_LMESS = T_LMESS
EXCEPTIONS
CALL_FORBIDDEN = 1
others = 9.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
endif.Hi,
The first thing you can do is to search this forum using the keywords.. you will get a solution most of the times (80%)..
Else you can try in the Transaction BAPI...
Even if that does not work out
Go to SE37 give some keywords and search for a FM yourself.
Eg: BAPI * STOR * and press F4 it will give you possible FMs... Now you need to check the documentation for that BAPI..
Hope it is of some help.
Regards,
Pramod -
Proposal of same destination storage bin as source storage bin
I am using the function module: 'L_TO_PREPARE_ITEM_INT' for finding out the destination bin. But I am getting the same storage bin of source bin for destination bin proposed thru this FM. It doesn't make any sense. How can I avoid proposal of same storage bin. Is there anything to do in configuration or any userexits can be used to avoid this problem.
Hello,
I suspect the issue is from because of Capacity Check Method. Try removing Capacity check Method. If it works fine, then, build the right capacity check method based on your need.
This should solve your problem.
Regards,
Sathish -
TO storage bin proposed u00BF?
I have a material with stock in storage bin 1, 2 and 3 that belong to the same storage type. The material picking strategy is F (fixed) and the material has the storage bin 1 setted in the material master.
I created a TO and it proposed to pick from storage bin 1 and 3, while storage 2 has stock ...
Have you idea why could be this happening? I checked the storage bin and it isn´t locked, the material has stock ... what other condition is working in storage bin determination?
thanks in advanceAhh, ok! but what of all the dates that are in LQUA table is considering? I have the following, and there is not the creation date, what date are you meaning?
Last movement
Last placement
Last removal
Last add to stock
GR Date
thanks! -
WMS: Config to block an occupied storage bin
Dear All,
I have got a user requirement where by upon stock placement, system should always propose the next empty bin available.
Besides that, a block should be applied on that bin immediately once stock placement is done. The block is to ensure, no further stock placement can be done into the storage bin, even though there is space available. It should not prevent picking.
The block should be removed, when the storage bin is empty.
From the above requirement, the stock placement strategy should be - Next Empty bin (L).
What about the blocking mechanism ? Is there any config that will acheive the requirement above.
Yes - at the storage type definition, there is a config called "block upon stock placement". However the block is only activated during stock placement. Once the TO is confirmed, the blocking is removed.
Appreciate if anyone out there could share their experience.
Thanks in advance.You can use the Capacity check method on the storage type.
2 Check based on palletization accord. to SUT 1
Maintain the Storage Unit type 1 in the material master and upon received, it will block.
Or
You can use the remaining capacity based on your process. -
Storage bin available when posting change is not confirmed completely
Dear Gurus, I have a question for you:
My costumer wants to do a posting change when the material is released from QM with a decision usage from Q to unrestricted use. The process is done in two steps: with LU04 the TO is generated and with LT12 is confirmed. When the TO is generated the position is half confirmed. With LT21 we can see the row for the ST (lets say ST 504 Open Storage type) and a second row 922 TR-ZONE. The first row appears green (as confirmed) and the second row appears red (Not confirmed).
My costumer says that " beacause of the strategy given for the storage entry, the storage bin released in the TO (not confirmed completely yet) is available at this moment.
If the storage bin is still physically full, the carrier will found not space for leaving the goods even SAP is telling him there is space available at this storage bin."
I have read that once yo start a TO the storage bin is blocked until the transaction is fully confirmed.
If this is correct I need to demostrate it and I don not find the way to do it.
I hope you understand my explanation and give me any clue.
I appreciate very much some help.
Alagmogena wrote:
Ok, I will tell you the configuration I have. Lets point in a movement 921 quality to unrestricted use.
> Type Storage origin: 902 EQ and RC flags are set on. (confirmation control for storage type)
> Type storage TR: 922 are set on.
>
> Movement type 921 the flags for Confirm immed and Propose confirm are NOT set.
>
> I do a LU01 to create a intruction to change a material from Q to Unrestricted.
> with LT05 I create the TO.
> At this time if I look LT21 the TO created I see the tag source with two positions one for TS 902 green color and the second 922 in red.
> For the tag of target We can see the first position 922 In red and the second position 902 in green color.
>
> Perhaps this detailed explanation will help you to fully understand the scenario.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Al.
From the above it isn't entirly clear that the first part of the T.O. is actualy confirmed, my settings are to autoconfirm this so I have no example to look at in my system. Perhaps the display shows the first line green before any actual confirmation..
I assume the stock status has not changed when you first view the T.O.? If the t.o. is partly confirmed I would expect to see the stock status changed and a neg in 922 until the second part is confirmed. Perhaps there is no confirmation at all yet, in LT21 what is the confirmation status? If you view the transfer order header there would be a partial confirmation showing with a yellow triangle, do you see this or no confirmation indicated at all? -
Storage type & storage bin field in mb1b
Dear all,
I want to put storage type & storage bin field in MB1B from where material has been transfer through 301 movement type to another plant.Our client want to put this field manually.What is configuration regarding this?
Thanks & Regards
Dipayan BoseHi
I assume that you are doing transfer posting between plants which have warehouse managed.
Check in OMLR for Immediate TO Creation ''A' for mvt type 301. Remove this
In OMLJ - Remove both TO item confirmation & Propose confirmation check boxes under confirmation field group.
Remove any Auto TO indicator in IMG>LE>WM>Transfers>Define Movement type.
Now you go to MB1B and do the transfer posting with Movement Type 301.
Next step go to LT06 to create TO from Material Document No. Give the Transfer posting doc no and press enter.
Inside the transaction you have button called create TO online, click this it will take you to another screen where you can enter the Storage type. storage section & storage bin manually.
LT12 - Confirm the TO to complete the transaction
Karthik
Karthik -
Hi,
I have few doubts in WMS area and they are
1. When we create Picking area and without picking area can we do the outbound delivery activities. What the relation between shipping point and picking area.
2. While creating storage bins which option do we use, i.e. Create storage bins immediately or on batch mode. If we have to
create in batch mode which batch job we have to schedule. Which one is client prefferable immediate creation or batch creation.Answer to your second question is that ,
Either you can created through bin structure i.e LS10
Secondly create program with LS01N transaction to load as many bins as you want.
This is your choice.
Regards,
Prashant -
Report for Material - Storage Location - Storage Bin
All SAP Gurus,
Is there any standard report available in which we can find out the storage bins for list of materials?
(We have not implimented Warehouse MAnagement)
Regards,HI,
You need to have Warehouse management in place in order to view the storage bins for materials,
MMBE of MM cannot give you the idea of storage bins.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Prasanna
Award pls if helpful. -
Storage bin Capacity utilization is greater than 100%
Hi,
Via LS03N, I can found that some capacity utilization is greater than 100%, this must be incorrect, what's the reason? is there any report to update the capacity utilization for storage bin?
Kindly please advise.
ThanksFor the capacity checks, the remaining capacities or the used weight in the storage bin master data are updated with every putaway or picking. If you change the inspection method in the current operations or you change capacity or weight data of materials or storage unit types, you then need to make a comparison of the data. You can make this comparison with report RLS10200. First read the documentation before you start the report.
-
Not Printing the source storage bin in the layout
Hi Gurus
As i am printing the layout to pick the goods for delivery, in which iam not getting the source storage bin for some deliveries only. sometimes its picking and some times not, what has been the reason behind it. i have take the help of an Ababper to check the conditions if any for that filed. but i cannot find any.
Please help me,
Thanks in advance,sorted out by setting the SPAD - Device types
format, just added the zxxx format to this and now it is working -
T.code for viewing stock at storage bin
Hi all,
What is the t. code used for viewing the stock at storge bin?I know this is WM question but your help is appreciated.
Regards,
ShailendraHi,
Following are the T-Codes:
LS26 Warehouse stocks per material
LI05 Inventory History for Storage Bin
LX02 Stock List
LX03 Bin Status Report
MB52 List fo warehouse stocks on hand
Regards,
Suresh' D. -
Cancel (reverse) Return Order, PGR not possible due to storage bin in 904
Hi gurus hope someone can explain in detail with transaction what am I missing since I'm MM guy and dont know very well SD transactions but here's my scenario,
There is a return order with a delivery (1110500002), then PGI (651), this drive me to process a Tansfer Req to move it from 904 to 010 storage type, and then do the billing, up to here the process is going well.
The problem comes when trying to reverse the above described process, I start with reverse the bill sith VF11 and then try to cancel the PGI ( PGR) with VL09 but system says "Storage bin 001 904 1110500002 does not exist (Check your entry)"
This is why I'm trying to fix the issue as MM guy, but I don't know why the error comes, this bins in 904 should be dynamic and create temporaly the bin 1110500002 which is the delivery that was created when the first return order was created.
I dont know if this error is related to MM movement types or to some config at the delivery type, o maybe the process we are following is not the correct for this because in transaction OMLR for IM 651 there is WM 651 but for 652 IM it's WM counter part is the general GI 255 mvt type so
Just to mention what I think that need to happen for the reverse of the return process is to cancel the bill then cancel the delivery and at this point negative stock should come into 904 bin 1110500002 and the creation of a TR to move from 010 to 904 after doing this TO then stock in 904 will be zero.
Please advise on how this process should happen.
Regards.Hi TQ,
Thanks for your reply, but I didn't understand what you mean with compare material master, compare it with what? And also I am not really sure that this could be the problem because I have this issue only when reversing the return, this means when I do the return the stock actually goes to 904 1110500002 so this means that the material has mantained correctly WM views in the material master.
Can you elaborate more in detail how you solved your error few months ago?
Thanks and regards -
Creation of New storage bins for storage type 007 in Production
Hi Gurus,
Coudl you please give me a clairty, storage bins can transport from Qaulity or we have to create seperately from server to server like Qulity and production.
thx
rHello,
As correctly mentioned storage bins never transported from one environment to other. You have to create through LS10 or LS01N.
The bin structure can get transposted from one environment to other & then you can open the structure & create bins in numbers.The bin structure can be seen through LS10 & created through same transaction.
Regards,
Prashant
Maybe you are looking for
-
I installed the Outlook mobile app on my iPhone using my Hotmail email address and the authenticator code. It works, but I can no longer send emails from Mail. I have not forgotten the password, so I don't know why I am unable to send messages from
-
Dear all, We are using CRM 5.0, while I try to open IC Webclient using CRM_IC transaction, system giving the follwoing message. The runtime repository could not be interpreted An exception has occurredException Class CX_BSP_WD_HTTP_COMM_ERROR Text: E
-
How can I upgrade my MacBook3,1 to switch from mobel me to icloud?
I have a MacBook 3,1. Version 10.6.8 snow leopard. How can I upgrade to Lion so I can switch from mobile me to icloud? I use a iMac 10.10 OS X Yosemite for all of my work, but going overseas, and was hoping to update the MacBook to use while I'm th
-
Advanced Security Manager on HPUX
Hi,I tried using ASM 1.5 downloaded from olapunderground and installed it on Win98 machine.I need to move my Security from 1 server to another. Both the essbase servers are on HP UX boxes.Both are different versions of Essbase Source is Essbase 6.2 a
-
Just that! Today I install it via App Store Updating.. I have a Macbook Pro Retina Display with Maverick 10.9.1 FCPX 10.1 works fine, but now with the updating does not open... other softwares such as Motion and Compressor works fine. Please HELP!