Work order Priority Authorization Object
Hi Friends,
I wanted to restrict Work Order Priority to only allow certain users (they have certain role) to set Priority,
can we do through standard security,if we can please provide me authorization object.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinika
Hi Srinika,
Goto SUIM, use option Authorization Objects by complex selction Criteria and Use "Field" to enter your required which need authorization control.
If standard object is available it will show in result else you need to find alternate custom option.
Rgds
Sunil
Similar Messages
-
Order item authorization object
Hi all
I am working with service orders in CRM 4.0. When I create a service order with several items, each of these items is assigned to a different user, so that he can solve it.
I would like to know if there is a standard way to allow users editing only one or more of these items. I have checked CRM standard authorization objects but I didn´t found any hint. Furthermore, I didn´t find any BAdI related to authority checks at service order item level.
Could you please help me on this issue?
Thanks in advance
PabloHi Srinika,
Goto SUIM, use option Authorization Objects by complex selction Criteria and Use "Field" to enter your required which need authorization control.
If standard object is available it will show in result else you need to find alternate custom option.
Rgds
Sunil -
How to restrict few users - Work order priority
Hi experts,
i have an requirement in WO (IW31), i have implemented a logic that user cannot change the WO priority once it is already released .
if sy-tcode = 'IW31' or sy-tcode = 'IW32' or sy-tcode = 'IW38' or sy-tcode = 'IW21' or sy-tcode = 'IW22'.
if caufvd_imp-auart = 'PM01' or caufvd_imp-auart = 'ZWNT' or caufvd_imp-auart = 'PM02'.
if lv_order_rel = 'X'.
clear : lw_jest.
select single * from jest into lw_jest where
objnr = caufvd_imp-objnr
and stat = 'I0001'
and inact <> 'X'.
if sy-subrc ne '0'.
message e032(zmm_dev).
endif.
endif.
Now i need to add workaround that the logic should bypass for few user and change the propriety, i assume i need to created specific role for them and impliment the logic.
Please let me know your ideas on how can i achieve the required restriction .
Regards
NiruGreetings Niru,
I guess you need to identify the role that should have this bypass by the authorization object and value and do an AUTHORITY-CHECK ? Maybe that thread will help How to Do Authority Check -
Authorization check creating Work Orders (IW31)
Hello everyone,
We need to make an authorization check when creating a Work Order in transaction IW31.
That check is based on the field "Main work center for maintenance tasks"
No check apart from the plant associated to the work center is done, but the problem is that there exist different Work Centers associated to the same plant, and we need to restrict it.
Our authorization model considers the Cost Center associated to the Work Center, but the Cost Center is not checked in this IW31 when entering the Work Center.
We have also tried using the classification system, but despite activating authorization obejct C_KLAH_BKL, is neither checked.
(It is amazing the difference between the number of objects marked to be checked in SU24 for this IW31 and the objects really checked when looking at authorizations trace)
We know that Work Center field exit could be used, but we would prefer not to change ABAP code.
Could you please give us a hint about how we can restrict this field?
Thank you very much.
Best regards.
Jose Sanz.Hi Jose,
You can look at the object C_ARPL_WRK,
if you work with this , i hope you would be able to find a solution for this situation.
Thanks,
Vijay -
Authorization group in Work order
Hi all,
I was doing some reading on authorization groups and found that in ECC 6.0 the transfer of authorization group is possible from the technical object to the work order.
My question: Is there an authorization group in the work order in 46C and where can I find it? I have looked through all tabs in the work order and could not find the field.
Thanks
MHi Mark
Authorization Group Means
You allocate the master record of this object to a group to which only certain users have access for processing the data. The users that have access authorization have the appropriate entry in their user master record.
It has no links to Work Order, i suppose. This AG will be responsible for the technical Objects...
If you want to check for the Work Order... u will be having fields like Person Responsible, Authorization to Particular User Etc...
I dont think there is any Connection between the two..
Can u tel us ? Why u want it in the order... If your requirement is not Standard also.. there will be any other way we can Find a Solution for your query.
- Pithan -
How is the object link populate into work order - IW31
Hello,
I am new in PM and am in the process of trying to picking up the concept.
Question:
When I create a maintenance order (IW31), how are all the relevant data being pull out and populate into the work order?
For example,
The maintenance plan includes functional area and equipment object, material objects, and task list object.
Next, you have the equipment master, which also includes the task list, and functional location.
Finally, you have the task list which includes the Maintenance BOM component.
Hence, when I create the PM order via IW31, how are all those object information pull out and import into the order? What is the sequence? I am confused on this.
Thanks
DanielDaniel,
When the work order is created from the maintenance plan it copies the maintenance item data into the order e.g. Floc, Equipment, Order Type, Main Work Centre, Priority, etc.
The operations for the order are determined from the task list assigned to the maintenance item dependent upon the rule governed by the maintenance plan type (performance, strategy,etc).
PeteA -
Authorization Object is not working when report is modified.
Hi BW Guru's
We have Company Code as Authorization Object .and we have 3 company Codes (xxxx,yyyy,zzzz).where the users under Company code xxxx are not supposed to view company code yyyy,zzzz data etc.
I modified an existing Report and transported to production.But the Authorization Object is not working for that report.The Report is defaultly displaying all the company codes data(xxxx,yyyy) for all the users.But for the other reports its(company code ) is working fine.
What could be the problem?Is theproblem in transporting the objects.But i transported all the objects inluding auhorization object.
Please send me the solution as it is very much urgent.
The solution will be def. awarded with full points.
Regards
Sanjayhi Sanjay,
please don't post the same question again, check and response back from your previous thread
Re: Authorization Object is not working when report is Modified.
hope this helps.
would be nice if you reward for helpful answers to all of your previous postings, e.g
docs related to RRI -
Analysis Authorization Object not working
Hi Gurus,
I m working on BI 7.0, I have created an analysis authorization object zz_div for 0DIVISION characteristic.
For a given report i want a given user to view only data for '32' and '33' 0DIVISION.
I have followed the below steps but still the report shows all data instead of restricted one.
1)RSECADMIN -> Maintenance ->zz_div ->Create
2) Add 0DIVISION in Auth structure , and in details
I EQ 32
I EQ 33
3) Add 0TCAIPROV with I EQ 0SD_C03
4) Add 0TCAACTVT, 0TCAKYFNM, 0TCAVALID, this having details as
I CP *
5) Then in User tab -> Assignment -> User -> Change-> Inserted ZZ_DIV-> Save
6) In Query created a Authorization variable(with no input prompt) and restricted 0DIVISION.
Following are the authorization object in that user's Role (Reporting Only)
S_RFC
S_TCODE
S_GUI
S_BDS_D
S_BDS_DS
S_OC_SEND
S_RS_AUTH - only having zz_div
S_RS_COMP
S_RS_COMP1
S_RS_ICUBE
S_RS_RSTT
S_RS_TOOLS
S_RS_PARAM
I have surfed lots of thread for this issue but not getting a solution
Tell me what i m missing in above or any additional setting need before creating analysis authorization
Edited by: Sonal Patel on Apr 18, 2009 8:10 AMHi
Thanks a Ton for ur reply
I have checked in SPRO : Analysis Authorization
where the authorization mode is " OLD obsolete Concept With RSR Authorization Objects "
We have to do the same in Production system .Can u please how its going to effect to others authorizations if change it to New Concept
Thanks
Sonal.... -
Authorization Objects for pricing conditions in Sales Order
Hi All,
In transaction VA03, we should restrict some users not to see pricing conditions tab in header and item level and net value on overview screen.
Is there anyone who knows how to do it? I wii be very glad if you help me.
Best Regards.Hi,
i have not done this exact limitation before, but I hope this method will help.You can look up the list of all authorization objects linked to the tcode in transaction SU22.
You can also get this by doing a user trace in ST01; and displaying the pricing condition.
once you have a rough idea, you can do a trial and error with the values inside these objects and see which one works.
Regards,
Soumya -
On Work Order using Object lists for equip u can manually create Notifi
On a maintenance Work Order using Object lists for equipment you can manually create a notification for each line item.
We want to automate this process to do this when we save the document.
Any ideau2019s on how to do this?
Does a user exit exist for this?Hi:
Check with Tcode: IBIP - Plant maintenace batch input utility tool.
Hope, it may help!
Thanks,
Murali. -
DMS: Object Links for Work Order
Hello All,
I would like to attach and checkin originals to a work order thru CV01N/CV02N transaction. But, there is no specific tab for work oder. How do I acheive this?
what configuaration and development has to be done?
Any kind of help is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
ChandraHi,
If you need only a tab to be seen in the CV01N/CV02N Tcodes, then there is a config settings,
Document Mangement--> Control Data->Define Document Types (under that select your document type to which this attachment is required) > Define object links> select the production order (PORDER---Object & Screen # 0251)
then you can see the production order tab in the DIR,
OR
As per my understanding of your requirement is:
When you attach a Original in DIR then it should be visible in the Production order also.
To achieve this you need to build a relation b/w Material Master & DIR (particular document type), so when a order is created then DIR with original will also get attached automatically so that you view, or through EWB also it can viewed & edited.
Hope i have understand correctly.
Regards
Rehman -
Authorization object for manual condition type in sale order
Hi experts
I want ask them, If exist an authorization object for manual Condition type (KOMV-KSCHL) in the sales order (VA01/VA02), that the user don' t can create neither modify the sale orden with a specific manual condition type (payment term) by stardard way.
Best regards
John AnguloHI John,
I would be surprised to know that someone uses the Payment terms as a condition in the Pricing procedure for sales orders. The payment terms define when the customer agrees to pay, (15, 20, 45 ,....days or 5 years or 10 years....whatever it be)
this detail for what i know is in the sales order header,and ideally has nothing to do with the Item level material price conditions.
its ok, If you mean something else by payment terms.....in principle you can have a conditon type restrcited such that manual entries on the condition are not possible. this cane be done in SPRO customizing, i am sure your functional consultants would know what to do (SPRO->Sales and Distribution->Basic Function->Condition Types), in the tab "Changes that can be made" have a value that says manual Processing is not allwowed
The ABAP route mentioned above is for a different scenarion and i dont think it is necessary for your requirement -
Work order dates calculated by priority when created by maintenance plan
Can anyone tell me how to get the dates on a work order created via a maintenance plan to be calculated from the priority? I know how to get the notification dates to calculate from the priority when created via a maintenance plan but I can't seem to get the order dates to do the same.
Any info would be most appreciated.Check these links
Influence Order basic start/end dates from maintenance plan
Scheduled Maintenance basic start and finish date -
Reference Object to Refresh Work Order Field Data
Dear Gurus,
In IW21/IW22 the reference object will populate the Responsibilities section of the Notification tab, and fields on the Location Data tab. When the reference object is changed, those same fields will update or refresh. The reference object will also populate field data in a work order if the work order is created from the notification, however, work order fields will not refresh if the reference object on the notification is changed. Nor will work order fields change if the reference object is changed directly within the work order.
Can anyone explain why fields will refresh in IW21/IW22 when the reference object is changed, but similar fields in the work order will not refresh when the reference object is changed in IW31/IW32?Hi Lisa,
When you execute IW31/IW32 transaction, in back ground standard SAP programs are called to perform order related task.
When transaction IW21 / IW22 is executed and order is created or changed at that point also standard SAP programs are called to perform order related task.
But program called by IW31/IW32 are different then that will called with IW21/IW22 and thus refresh dont happen if u change reference object in notification once after order is created.
You need to manually change in work order. -
Work order Screen objects settings
Hi Experts,
I've a requirement to display the Add. DeviceID onto the work order screen, along with Equipment and Functional location.
I've tried to do this via using ref. Screen object O130 (Serial No.+ Material No.+ Device Id) wherein I can get the DeviceID field successfully displayed onto IW31 screen.
But in this case problem is , the Equipment and Functional location is not being displayed , instead Serial no. and Material fields are there. It can be displayed via Screen Object 0100.
Now as per my need , the requirement would be fulfilled via mix of O100 & O130. So the question is , is there any way , we can create our own custom Screen objects , wherein can select the required fields.
Also Even if I'm using screen object O100 , I can view the Add. Device data field into IW38 (Order List) against the Order No. Is there any settings, we can display this Device data field on IW31 screen as well??
Waiting for your valuable reply..
Thx in advance.Hi Dennis,
You can add additional fields like your DeviceId with the help of screen-exit available in Enhancement
IWO10018
This gives an additional tab in IW31 screen named Enhancement where your custom fields appear.
Screen looks like this
After the above exercise, you need to take this field into the structure RIHAUFK_LIST, through Append Structure.
See this IW38 screen,
The above inputs would make an ABAPer perform the task needed by you easily.
Jogeswara Rao K
Maybe you are looking for
-
ASDM not opening in browser!!!!!!!!!
My ASDM with ASA not working (GNS3) ASDM is 603 and 649 and I am using 8.0.2 and 8.4.2 ASAs, but from browser https://192.168.1.200/ it is not opening. I guess problem of java I installed 1.6.0.07. and other 6 update 34 and 7 update 45 but not workin
-
There are 2 issues i have with the My Verizon Page and they dont go away: 1. That message saying 'Action Needed' asking me to verify my email address. What is this? I click on send email verification , then it says sent and I x out and then when I g
-
Reading P2 quicktime mov files
Hi. My computer opens & can read the Quicktime movie files that are created through Final Cut Pro from P2 cards. My client's computer cannot. Is that because she doesn't have Quicktime Pro?..or something else? TIA, Heather
-
Implementing callback handler for a JMSControl
Hi, I am implementing an MDB using the JMSControl. When the control is generated it contains a callback method. How do i go about using the call back method or implementing the interface provided in there? I would like to execute
-
Starting with javacard development
Hello, I have to start the development of JavaCard applet and I need some information concerning which smart card to buy. As reader I have found the Omnikey CardMan 5321 and the 3121 except for the dual interface of the first one, are them comparable