Work Order Problem

Hello,
I open trransaction IH01. Entered Functional location ABCD and then select equipment number 1234567 from structure.
Then from top clicked on GOTO and create order.
IH01 Screen is opened: I enterd the details like 1) Order Type:- PM03 ( General) 2) Priority- Safety and 3) Planning plant
Functional location and equipment is picked.
After that i enter the description and i can see other details are filled already like plant control key , activity type. I release order and save. Order Gets generated.
Then 2nd time for same functional location and equipment in IH01 i click on GOTO and create order. Enter initial details again on front screen like order type , priority and Plant. Then i see that other details are not picked this time like control key , activity type and i can not save the order.
Then 3rd time when i tried is picking again and fourth time not.... Did not able to undestand behaviour why this happens?
Let me know if any info required.
Regards
Himanshu

Hello,
Thanks alot for prompt reponse
But for the first time its picking up work centre. If its deleted then it should not pick up for first time itself.
Second time same steps but not picking up and its asking me to enter the details. Then again 3rd time picking up 4th time not .. 5th time pciked up and 6th not..
Stepr are same
Thats IH01>enter functional location>select equipment>GOTO>create order>enter details on first screen and enter> work centre etc were present already>just save and order created.
Regards
Himanshu

Similar Messages

Goos issue through MIGO based on work order problems

Hi All,
Can any one guide me how to overcome the error"Purchasinh Info record not found in purchasing organisation 2434" while doing Goods(consignment materials) Issue through MIGO transaction based on work order. How to create the Purchase Info record??
Any pointer from any side will be highly appreciable...thanks in Advance
Regards
Azizur

Dear Azis,
Double Click on the serial no of the Component you will get the inforecord fieldin the Purchasing tab. But this is only for Stock Materials.
Please recheck again your components.
Regards,
Shareeq
Edited by: K M AHAMED SHAREEQ HUSSAIN on Oct 13, 2009 2:42 PM

Problem while Creating Service order through Work Order

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem While creating Service order (me21n) through - Work order it contains service requisitions.
So that means they carry information such as G/L and work order number while entering the requistion no in PO Creation Screen (me21n) which automatically should be picked from the work order refference.
But problem here is the service items and all other are assigned to PO except the Account Assingnment tab which is GL Account and Work Order No and Cost center..
Can anyone explain me this?
Is this something that one can explain?
Regards,
Murugesh R
Rewards for value replies.

Closed..

PM: Problemas de "Print Preview" al imprimir varias Work Order

Buenos dias Estimados,
Estoy experimentando problemas a la hora de imprimir varias Work Orders usando las transacciones IW32 , IW33 y IW38.
Al intentar imprimir 20 work orders juntas, 20 ventanas de Print Preview aparecen asi dificultando la impresion de multiples work orders.
SI alguien tiene alguna respeusta o ayuda para resolver este problema de setting se agradece.
Gracias!

Hola:
Se me ocurre que podría ser que estuvieses llamando a tu programa de impresión cada vez que quieres realizar una copia de tu formulario. Eso no es necesario ya que puedes enviar el número de copias por parámetro a tu formulario. Quizá sea eso, a ver si hay suerte.
Saludos,
Óscar
http://blogdesap.blogspot.com

Have a Problem in EAM work order creation API........

I have used the following code to create work order but i was unable to do so
I am getting return status SUCCESS(S)....
but am unable to view the record in EAM_WORK_ORDERS_V..
any sort of help would be appreciated...
declare
g_eam_wo_relations_tbl0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_relations_tbl_type;
g_eam_wo_relations_rec eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_relations_rec_type;
g_eam_op_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_rec_type;
g_eam_op_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_rec_type;
g_eam_op_network_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_network_rec_type;
g_eam_op_network_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_network_rec_type;
g_eam_mat_req_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_mat_req_rec_type;
g_eam_mat_req_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_mat_req_rec_type;
g_eam_di_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_direct_items_rec_type;
g_eam_di_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_direct_items_rec_type;
g_eam_res_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_rec_type;
g_eam_res_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_rec_type;
g_eam_res_inst_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_inst_rec_type;
g_eam_res_inst_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_inst_rec_type;
g_eam_op_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type;
g_eam_op_tbl1 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type;
g_eam_op_network_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_network_tbl_type;
g_eam_res_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_tbl_type;
g_eam_res_inst_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_inst_tbl_type;
g_eam_sub_res_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_sub_res_tbl_type;
g_eam_res_usage_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_usage_tbl_type;
g_eam_mat_req_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_mat_req_tbl_type;
g_eam_di_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_direct_items_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_wo_relations_tbl eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_relations_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_wo_rec eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_rec_type;
g_out_eam_wo_tbl eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_op_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_op_network_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_network_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_res_inst_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_inst_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_sub_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_sub_res_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_res_usage_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_usage_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_mat_req_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_mat_req_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_di_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_direct_items_tbl_type;
g_eam_wo_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_rec_type;
g_eam_wo_rec2 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_rec_type;
g_eam_wo_tbl0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_tbl_type;
g_eam_wo_res_usg_tbl0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_usage_tbl_type;
l_return_status VARCHAR2(1);
l_msg_count NUMBER;
g_eam_wo_usg_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_usage_rec_type;
g_eam_wo_usg_rec2 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_usage_rec_type;
begin
g_eam_wo_rec1 := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.transaction_type := EAM_PROCESS_WO_PVT.G_OPR_CREATE;
g_eam_wo_rec1.batch_id := 1;
G_EAM_WO_REC1.HEADER_ID := 1;
G_EAM_WO_REC1.WIP_ENTITY_ID := NULL;
g_eam_wo_rec1.wip_entity_name := '10040';
g_eam_wo_rec1.organization_id := 207;
g_eam_wo_rec1.asset_group_id := 16884;
g_eam_wo_rec1.asset_number := '28Z1933';
g_eam_wo_rec1.rebuild_item_id := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.rebuild_serial_number := null;
G_EAM_WO_REC1.MAINTENANCE_OBJECT_SOURCE := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.maintenance_object_type := 3;
g_eam_wo_rec1.maintenance_object_id := 1768219;
g_eam_wo_rec1.parent_wip_entity_id := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.manual_rebuild_flag := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.owning_department := 4002 ;
g_eam_wo_rec1.description := 'Creating a Released Work Order';
g_eam_wo_rec1.class_code := 'MAINT';
g_eam_wo_rec1.status_type := wip_constants.released;
g_eam_wo_rec1.date_released := sysdate-100;
g_eam_wo_rec1.firm_planned_flag := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.scheduled_start_date := sysdate;
g_eam_wo_rec1.requested_start_date := sysdate;
g_eam_wo_rec1.scheduled_completion_date := sysdate;
g_eam_wo_rec1.material_issue_by_mo := 'N';
g_eam_wo_rec1.priority := 10;
g_eam_wo_rec1.issue_zero_cost_flag := 'Y';
g_eam_wo_rec1.po_creation_time := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.job_quantity := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.notification_required := 'N';
g_eam_wo_tbl0(1) := g_eam_wo_rec1;
EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.PROCESS_WO
( p_bo_identifier => 'EAM'
, p_api_version_number => 1.0
, p_init_msg_list => TRUE
, p_commit => 'Y'
, p_eam_wo_rec => g_eam_wo_rec1
, p_eam_op_tbl => g_eam_op_tbl0
, p_eam_op_network_tbl => g_eam_op_network_tbl0
, p_eam_res_tbl => g_eam_res_tbl0
, p_eam_res_inst_tbl => g_eam_res_inst_tbl0
, p_eam_sub_res_tbl => g_eam_sub_res_tbl0
, p_eam_res_usage_tbl => g_eam_res_usage_tbl0
, p_eam_mat_req_tbl => g_eam_mat_req_tbl0
, p_eam_direct_items_tbl => g_eam_di_tbl0
, x_eam_wo_rec => g_eam_wo_rec2
, x_eam_op_tbl => g_out_eam_op_tbl
, x_eam_op_network_tbl => g_out_eam_op_network_tbl
, x_eam_res_tbl => g_out_eam_res_tbl
, x_eam_res_inst_tbl => g_out_eam_res_inst_tbl
, x_eam_sub_res_tbl => g_out_eam_sub_res_tbl
, x_eam_res_usage_tbl => g_eam_res_usage_tbl0
, x_eam_mat_req_tbl => g_out_eam_mat_req_tbl
, x_eam_direct_items_tbl => g_out_eam_di_tbl
, x_return_status => l_return_status
, x_msg_count => l_msg_count
, p_debug => 'Y'
, p_output_dir => '/sqlcom/log/lv115dyp'
, p_debug_filename => 'eambo22.log'
, p_debug_file_mode => 'w'
dbms_output.put_line('work order creation status:'||l_return_status);
commit;
END;
thanks in advance
DEV

You have opened the render engine, not the full program.
Mylenium

Problems to set TECO status in PM work orders

Hi all,
I have the next situation: I have a PM work order and its status is Released (REL). When i try to set TECO status (technnical complete), the system send me the following error: " to close order must change user status to TECO ". I am not using USER STATUS ... I just using system status ... that's the reason I dont understand the error.
Thanks for your answer.

Hi,
The message sounds like a custom message. Is there any exit active that might be checking for a specific user status? Maybe customer exit IWO10004 (EXIT_SAPLCOIH_004), this is executed when orders are technically completed.
-Paul
Use Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) forum for PM/CS specific topics
Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)

Problem with Work Order Form

Hi All,
           I am workin on Work Order Print for the transaction
IW 32. When I choose PRINT/FAX button its generating a spool. and in the transaction IW32 its updating a field system status as 'PRT'. But if I choose 'PRINT PREVIEW', its displaying the Print Preview. In PRINT PREVIEW I have an option 'PRINT' if I choose this PRINT option from this print preview system generatin a spool but not updating the field system status as 'PRT'. I am unable to debug the program through direct 'PRINT' option because it is executing in back ground mode. Can any body please help me to sort out this issue. Its urgent production issue.
                                                                                Thanks.
                                                  Ranganadh.

Hi all,
         Can anybody please tell me how to debug the print program of the forms when it has been scheduled in background?
                                                        Thanks.

Error when printing work order with iw32

Hello all,
When i was printing work order using IW32, the order success to be saved but it can't be printed. And i get this error message :
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author ...
i check with T-Code SM13, and i found error on
PM_ORDER_PRINT_CONTROL
further, i go check to ABAP Short dump, and found the error analysis
A RAISE statement in the program "SAPLSFES " raised the exception
condition "CONTROL_FLUSH_ERROR".
Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior program
in the hierarchy, processing was terminated.
have anyone know the OSS or have some experience to solve this problem ? hope you can help me..
thank you for your attention..
Regards,
Anggara Mahardika

Hi
Can u let us know whether u are trying to Save the Print out on to ur Desktop ... or using GUI_DOWNLOAD Fm in ur program ...
surya

Work Order Status report

Hi,
Any body have ideal?
What are the work order summary report mean for?
I am using T-code ZPM02 to view the report but the report display the work center according to the category CRTL,REL,PCNF,CNF,TECO and CLSD with each colunmn display the figure.
What is mean for CRTL,REL,PCNF,CNF,TECO and CLSD?

PeteA,
Thank you for the information, the report is indeed a customized report.
Could advice how to diffrentiaze between customize and standard report in SAP system?
Can the IW39 list all orders with all the status in IW39?
The reason being I am having problem with the customize report display (work order summary report)the status diffrence with the IW39 is the detail report.I am now looking for the SAP standard report for work order summary report to compare with the customize report to verify which report are display not correct.
Do you have any ideal others than IW39 what others report in SAP system show the work order summary report?
Many thanks.
Karen

Work Order Reporting using I_BEGRP as a selection criteria

Hello all,
I am having a small problem regarding the authorization object I_BEGRP, which appears at general data informed tab at equipment level. The situation is as described below:
Our client has several subcontractors working with Maintenance Work Orders in the system, and in order to control that each subcontractor does only access to their own data (equipment, work orders, etc.) different authorization group has been used to assign each of the equipment.
Problem is now when the client needs to be able to know the list of MWO per subcontractor.
The need is clear: for a user that is not restricted by this authorization group, it cannot be usedas a selection criteria to obtain a list of WO of a certain subcontractor.
I have seen that it can be shown in the equipment standard report IH08, but only as exit data, but not as entry selection criteria, but neither for MWO (IW39) nor for notifications (IW29) it can be used as an entry selection criteria.
Can someone help me with this issue? is the only solution to make a custom development, and to copy program RIAUFK20 in order to allow this field as an input?
Thank you very much for your help.
BR,
Francesc.

Hi,
the only workaround I can think of is to use suitable search help for equipment. So the process would be to run IW29, open search help for equipment that allows you to specify authorization group (I think Equipment by Equipment list should work), then select all equipments from the auth. group and then run IW29 restricted by equipments. It's not nice but it allows you to select all orders that have equipments assigned to some specific authorization group. Otherwise you need to enhance standard reports to allow authorization group as one of the select options.
Cheers

Work Order Creation Time

Hi Guys
I need a help with a problem here
Our maintenance guys work in 3 different shifts. We would like to get a report about the workload in each shift
I was wondering if its possible to get a list of orders with the creation time of each order.
How can I get this info? The work order creation time?
Thanks and Regards

Transaction IW38 will give you a list based on the the date created you would need to create a varaint with a list of the user ID's that belong in each of the 3 shiftes this would then give a report of the orders created by Shift on any given day.
Alternatively if you wanted to find out the orders on a weekly basis this could be done using the user ID's with a period of time over a week for instance.
Hope this helps
Jim

Work Order - TECO Status Question

Dear All,
Is there a way to indicate who performed the last accounting transaction with a Work order?
For example, Who Teco'd the order and when it was Teco'd, etc..
This allows me to create a report to show productivity of how many work orders being complete.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Mike

Hello Michale
From PP Stand point ,if you are looking at TECO of Production order with individual person did , U can use COOIS functionality seleting Sytem Status : TECO and Give the Production Scheduler .There are lot of functionality u can use within date ranges, plant wise , material wise and u have the option to choose various lay out to generate report from COOIS.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Regards
Jia

Work Order Cost Rolling Up to WBS Element!

Hi everyone,
I created a Project A with WBS structure in PS (not statistical WBS structure). And then I assigned a work order to one of the WBS element A.0001. I did not post any cost to the WBS element directly. I only charged $1000 to the work order. Now when I use CN41N to generate the cost report and I found the $1000 in work order rolled up to WBS element A.0001 ($1000 showed at work order level and also WBS element level). Then I settled $1000 in the work order to a WBS element C.0001 in Project C. When I run CN41N again to see the cost in Project A, the $1000 still showed up at work order level, but it did not show up at WBS element level A.0001. I need the cost to roll up at WBS element level also, so this is a big problem for me.
I did several test. Assigned another work order to this WBS element A.0001 and charged another $1000 to the work order. Then I settled them to cost center directly instead of to WBS element. The $1000 showed up at the work order level and also at WBS element level (the cost rolled up from work order to the WBS element in that report). Then I tried to settle to GL account, the cost will roll up to WBS element too.
So I found only when I settle the cost to WBS element, the cost won't roll up. I think it might be a configuration problem. Does anyone know where I need to configure in order to let the cost roll up to the WBS element after I settle the Work order to a WBS elements?
Really appreciate your help!
Ting

Hi Martina,
This is awesome, very helpful! Now I know how to deal with it.
Thanks a lot!
Ting

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

I am unable to save a service work order designated and configured as MRS work order

Every time I try to create a SM work order, and save it, I get the following message"
Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" had to be terminat
     it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    In include "/MRSS/LRSG_PMCS_APPSCHEDF02 ", in line 93 of
"/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PMCS_APPSCHED             ", the following syntax er
    have occurred:
    The row type of the table "G_APPOINTMENT_LIST" is not compatible wit
    field symbol type "<APPOINTMENT_LIST>".
    Author and last person to change the include are:
    Author         SAP
    Last changed by "SAP         "
Any help or advise that would allow me to successfully create the work order and then open the planning board to view both the demand and the resources? I would appreciate any help. Thanks

Hi Hussein,
I found a SAP note 2030049 that is relevant to the problem: http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2030049
But when attempting to implement the note, it showed a syntax error.
Will likely log this with SAP for resolution.
Regards, Warren

Work Order Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for