Workflow Condition giving strange output

Hello Experts,
I am getting an strange issue in my workflow.
Here is the condition in the workflow -
&SWITCHDOC.SERVICEPROVIDERNEW.SERVICEPROVIDER& NE "space"  AND
&SWITCHDOC.TARGETSUPPLYSCENARIO.VERSORGUNGSSZENARIO& NE "space"
still i get the result false even if both the filed is filled in the container
Can any one suggest me somthing on this issue?
Thanks in Advance,
Pritam

Hi Pritam,
whats the data type of your two parameters?
Please check is there any default values and if it is type 'NUMC' means it has 0000 by default.
So it can also made the conflict.
Thanks,
Vijay.

Similar Messages

  • Snmp giving strange output

    I'm trying to configure snmp to allow monitoring on 'solarwinds' software. This is just a simple server health monitor so I didn't think the setup would be complicated (I still don't think it will be, I must be missing something basic).
    Anyway I have confirmed the daemon is running and created a snmpd.conf file containing only the system location, system contact and a rocommunity string of public.
    Then when I run a 'snmpwalk -c public localhost' command in terminal it only returns the system contact then says - 'No more variables left in this view (it is past the end of the MIB tree)'
    I have 4 servers, 2 of which return this and won't work with the monitoring software and 2 of which work exactly as expected. As far as I can tell they have the same snmpd.conf settings, I've triple checked the community names and all have the service confirmed running.
    If anyone has any ideas about this then I'd be grateful for the advise, I'm about to pull my hair out.

    just to be clear my snmpd.conf file looks like this :
    # snmpd.conf
    #   - created by the snmpconf configuration program
    # SECTION: Access Control Setup
    #   This section defines who is allowed to talk to your running
    #   snmp agent.
    # rocommunity: a SNMPv1/SNMPv2c read-only access community name
    #   arguments:  community [default|hostname|network/bits] [oid]
    rocommunity  public
    # SECTION: System Information Setup
    #   This section defines some of the information reported in
    #   the "system" mib group in the mibII tree.
    # syslocation: The [typically physical] location of the system.
    #   Note that setting this value here means that when trying to
    #   perform an snmp SET operation to the sysLocation.0 variable will make
    #   the agent return the "notWritable" error code.  IE, including
    #   this token in the snmpd.conf file will disable write access to
    #   the variable.
    #   arguments:  location_string
    syslocation  "B1_D15"
    # syscontact: The contact information for the administrator
    #   Note that setting this value here means that when trying to
    #   perform an snmp SET operation to the sysContact.0 variable will make
    #   the agent return the "notWritable" error code.  IE, including
    #   this token in the snmpd.conf file will disable write access to
    #   the variable.
    #   arguments:  contact_string
    syscontact  [email protected]
    So I would expect a giant stream of data with a simple snmpwalk command but what I get is the following. I have the same configuratoin on other servers and they seem to work perfectly well :
    chskod02mp:snmp admin$ snmpwalk -c public localhostSNMPv2-MIB::sysContact.0 = STRING: [email protected]
    SNMPv2-MIB::sysContact.0 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)

  • Query giving wrong output

    I am trying to look for sub programs that use the synonyms in the schema.I wrote the following query.But its giving strange output.
      select usy.synonym_name, us.text, us.name, us.type
      from user_synonyms usy, user_source us
    where upper(us.text) like ('%' || usy.synonym_name || '%')
       and usy.synonym_name in
           (select synonym_name
              from user_synonyms us
             where us.synonym_name <> us.table_name
               and table_owner = 'XYZ')
    order by usy.synonym_nameOutput
    synonym_name text
    txn_deposit select pir_detail_txn.instrument_amnt
    I wonder why txn.instrument is taken same as txn_instrument which is the synonym name??

    where name like 'txn_instrument'
    give all outputs like
    txn_instrument
    txn.instrument
    txn1instrument
    txn2instrument .......
    but
    where name like 'txn\_instrument' escape '\'
    gives only txn_instrument
    ~Praveen

  • Regarding Workflow condition

    Hello,
    i need help regarding workflow condition..
    When the Owner of the record gets changed to a specific user i want to create a set of tasks automatically created,.. is it possible using workflows, if possible what is the trigger event i have to use and what is the workflow condition.. please help me out its very urgent

    Hi again,
    i have used the following:
    Trigger Event : when modified record saved
    Condition : FieldValue('<Owner>') = "Jenny Adams"
    and created list of actions for creating tasks.. but i think there is problem with condition.. please help me with condition.. i also tried
    [<Owner>]='Jenny Adams'
    [<Owner>]="Jenny Adams"
    FieldValue('<Owner>') = 'Jenny Adams'

  • Workflow condition question

    Whenever a new opportunity is being added, If the ExternalSystemId field is blank then go ahead and fire off the workflow action. If it's NOT blank then do not fire off the workflow
    In the workflow condition, I have this
    len(Field_Value('<ExternalSystemId>')) = 0 OR len(Field_Value('<ExternalSystemId>')) IS NULL
    but it still fires off the workflow even though the external system id field has something in it.
    Do you have any idea?
    Thanks

    If I understand your question, you would need to write your default expression in the field definition (read the Default value and post default behavior). There are no workflow triggers for create (new Opportunity).

  • Condition Records For output

    Hi,
    Can anyone help me how to find the condition records for output.
    We have for the pick, pack and stage different printing options.
    How can I check it on the system that they have been configured

    go to NACE and check output type V4 for Picking V6 for Handling Unit and V2 for Shipping. You need to configure Pick Slip, Packing List/Delivery Note and HU labels here. Then you can chose out put on delivery for printing.

  • Condition Dependent Document Output

    Hello, all
    Please help me,
    We have extended classic scenario in SRM 5.0.
    May I to use Condition Dependent Document Output in Spro
    if  I need  to print 2 smartforms for one purchase order?
    Best regards,
    Guzal

    Hello, all
    I'm solved a question. I'm used the BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF.
    Best regards,
    Guzal

  • Issue with Condition dependent PO output

    Hi,
    We're implementing Extended classic version for SRM 5.0.
    As part of the output determination, we need to determine 2 print outputs for Purchase orders. We have 2 purchase organizations and both of them need to have 2 different smartforms for the print. So, we're designing 2 different smartforms. In order to assign the smartforms as per the purchasing org, I've used "Condition dependent output" in IMG settings. But whenever I try to print, it picks up the standard form from the IMG node "Define actions for Document Output" where the standard form is maintained. We did not maintain the custom form in this node because we have 2 forms for print.
    I would like the program to pick up the custom form maintained in " Condition dependent document output".
    I understand that we could use the BADI alternatively. But any help in resolving this problem through the configuration is highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Lakshmi

    Hi,
    Pls implement the badi "BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF".
    For sample code/pointers,see the foll links;
    Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
    Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
    Re: Smartform display
    Re: Add a Printer ?  -> LP01
    Re: Condition Dependent Document Output
    Re: Add a Printer ?  -> LP01
    sending Smart form to Printer  in SRM
    Re: SRM PO's to be printed out with the PO
    BR,
    Disha.

  • Help Tomcat + Apache = strange output

    my jsp website works fine under tomcat 3.2.3, when i try to use apache 1.3 as web server, everything seems ok except that some jsps generate strange output. such as:
    HTTP/1.1 200 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:09:02 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23 (Win32) mod_jk/1.1.0 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=98 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=GB2312
    the http header is displayed instead of web contents. does anyone know what is the problem? by the way, the jsp uses response.sendRedirect.
    any comments is welcome, thanks in advance.

    my jsp website works fine under tomcat 3.2.3, when i
    try to use apache 1.3 as web server, everything seems
    ok except that some jsps generate strange output.
    The http header is displayed instead of web contents.
    does anyone know what is the problem? by the way, the
    jsp uses response.sendRedirect.
    any comments is welcome, thanks in advance.Hi,
    I am doing some tests on the Dwarf Server Framework (http://www.gnome.sk). A HTTP server with a servlet container is part of it too.
    I wanted to know if something that does not work under tomcat 3.2.3 would work on DWARF.
    By the way, did the good jsps use the response.sendRedirect too?
    Could you please send me a jsp page which generates the strange output?
    Thanks,
    Erika

  • Triggering workflow through MIGO in output type

    Hi Friends,
                  After the GR Documents are posted, I need to Trigger GR  Workflow......
    Please guide me any Function modules or BAIDs
    to keep our code once the MKPF and MSEG DB Tables are updated with recently Created new Documents....
    Can we Assign our Workflow Template in the OUTPUT Type in NACE.
    If so, Please Guide me with the OUTPUT Type configuration Steps
    Thanks in Advance,
    Ganesh

    I think you can use standard Buiness object BUS2017. While creating the document please check which events gets trggered in SWEL. I am sure the Created event of this Business object gets triggered.
    Thnaks
    Arghadip

  • Condition Dependent PO output

    Hi Friends,
    I have maintained the PO output condition as 'Processing using Selection Report' in
    (IMG): SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Set Output Actions and Output Format->Define Actions for Purchase Order Output.
    In (IMG): SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Set Output Actions and Output Format->Condition-Dependent Purchase Order Output, I have maintained the
    Processing Time as 'Processing when saving the document' for e-mail output.
    But currently my system is not taking the Processing time ''Processing when saving the document' which I maintained in Condition Dependent PO output. It is taking the
    value 'Processing using Selection Report' which I maintained in Define Actions for Purchase Order Output.
    So when my PO is ordered the output status will be "Not Processed' at first and then I have to manually process it or run the selection report to process it.
    I want the Po output to be "Successfully Procssed" immediately after the PO is ordered with my current settings. Is that possible? Kindly help me with this issue.
    Thanks in Advance...
    Best Regards,
    Vidya

    Hi,
    Pls implement the badi "BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF".
    For sample code/pointers,see the foll links;
    Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
    Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
    Re: Smartform display
    Re: Add a Printer ?  -> LP01
    Re: Condition Dependent Document Output
    Re: Add a Printer ?  -> LP01
    sending Smart form to Printer  in SRM
    Re: SRM PO's to be printed out with the PO
    BR,
    Disha.

  • MCLH giving no output, Problem in Populating tables S091, S090

    In out client system,
    When we are trying to Run MCLH, it is not giving any output.
    1. The tables S090, S091 are empty.
    2. when we run the LIS( logistic information system )over all check, it came up with the following errors.
    -Errors in field catalog
    -Error in update rule
    3. When trying to populate the tables S090, S091 through transactions LCO1 & LCO2 ( New setup for info structures S090, S091 ) its not happening.
    Can any one suggest how to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mallika Maktala.

    Hi Mallika ,
    this is the problem with the Updating rule which u are defined . So better to cross check in SPRO tcode.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • What happened to useful workflow conditions?

    I'm jumping from 2007 workflows to 2013 and finding a lot of things I can't do that I used to be able to.  I would have thought workflows options would have expanded not shrunk.  what has happened to the condition item "begins with" or
    "contains"  or "is empty" ?
    Also, how do I make link two conditions with and AND operator.?  If This AND That?
    There are no mistakes; every result tells you something of value about what you are trying to accomplish.

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to know what happened to useful workflow conditions.
    There are features that are deprecated in or removed from SharePoint Designer 2013. Features that are deprecated are included in the SharePoint 2013 release for compatibility with previous product versions but will be removed from future
    versions.
    There are also the capabilities and features that are new to workflows in SharePoint 2013.
    For more information, you can refer to:
    What's changed in SharePoint Designer 2013
    What's new in workflows for SharePoint 2013
    In addition, you can also use And operator in the condition.
    You can add a condition, and then click the condition and add another condition.
    You can create workflow as below:
    Thanks,
    Linda Li                
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Correct workflow condition syntax?

    Which of these two workflow conditions is correct?
    a)      (Left([<Owner>], 3) = "952")
    or
    b)     (Left([<Owner>], 3) = 952")
    Both check out as far as syntax is concerned. b) was in place up until a few minutes ago, but I'm wondering whether conditions like it throw off workflow actions by acting on the value of PRE('Owner') instead of the one that's been changed.

    We have workflows in place that are designed to assign an account to a book based on the first 3 characters of the value updated in the Owner field. For example, if the owner is 953000, the workflow action should assign the account to the 953 book.
    What appears to be happening is that it's being assigned to a Book that matches the 3-character string associated with the PREVIOUS owner. For example. I have a record whose owner is 174000. If I set the owner to 953000, the Book designation remains unchanged. If I then set the owner to 999999, the Book designation then changes to the 953 book.

  • How to create an output condition record for output type

    For SD LE shipping...
    Create an output condition record for output type
    Thanks!
    Message was edited by:
            Hoo Laa
    Message was edited by:
            Hoo Laa

    Hi Hoo,
    Follow the path.
    SAP Easy Access -> Logistics -> Logistics Execution -> Master Data -> Output   -> Shipping - > Create.
    Tcode: VV21.
    Hope I have clarified your query. Do reward if so.
    Regards
    Nadarajah Pratheb

Maybe you are looking for