Workflow Prefix creation problem.

Hi Experts,
When I try to create a new prefix in my development system it is not asking me the transport request but when I save the prefix does not appear in the list.
I am sure that there is no prefix number existing for the present system and client combination.
Thanks,
Chakri.

Hi,
It is the right behaviour of the SAP system that you're not prompted for a transport request (it only makes sense on a development system, unless you want to develop on QAS and PRD).
Did you check in SWU3 that the prefix number doesn't exist for workflow templates?
Kind regards, Rob Dielemans

Similar Messages

Help PLZ Parrell Prefix Sum Problem

i'm really stuck i need to write a parrell soultion to the prefix sum problem. i'm new 2 java and v.confused any help anybody can give would be major major help

STFW
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/academic/class/15251-s00/2000/Site/Materials/Lectures/lecture07/parallel.htm
Slides 26-32 shows exactly how it could be done.
- Marcus Sundman

Is there a administration team in SAP to allocate the workflow prefix NO.

If we want to implement SAP Business workflow in our own application, how do we know which prefix number should be used? Is there a administration team in SAP internally to allocate the workflow prefix number?

Hi Ya Wang,
    You have to do all workflow customizing settings in the system before you are going to start workflow development or run the workflow in the very beging stage.
    After u completed the workflow customizing, system will allocate unique prefix number to each system. we need not bother about those things.
    To do those Setting we have to go to the Transaction <b>SWU3</b> and do all customizing there itself.
    Please let me know that still u r NOT clear.
Thanks & Regards,
S. Manikanda.
Note:- Pls don't forget to reward the points to me.

Workflow deadline expression problem

Hi;
I have a problem and I must solve .
I created workflow and defined latest end (deadline) for activity .
I selected refer data/time tabs and expression.
I filled data and time as dynmically in other words deadline change according to program.But workflow don't accept dynmical data and time.It doesn't work.
WHY?

I am passing the date and time as event parameters
if I write like that;
   refer fate/time =expression
   date = &lv_date&
   time = &lv_time&
   deadline doesn't work.
if I write like that;
    refer fate/time =work item creation
    date = &lv_date&
    time = &lv_time&
in this shape; if I triggered workflow firstly ,deadline work BUT if I triggered workflow secondly ,deadline does't work because lv_date and lv_time's value doesn't change.Values remain the same.
I don't understand WHY?

Transport Request Workflow Prefix

hi,
all my Workflows are working in DEV system,
i transported all my requests to QAS,
but in QAS the SWU3 under Maintain Prefix Numbers, its showing (X) Red,
i do not know when settings were done in DEV did it ask request for Maintain Prefix.
So now my prob is in QAS Maintain Prefix is Red (X), how do i solve my problem.
Aditya

It happened to me and I solved this following exactly this steps:
You have to configure to PRD first->transportate the request up to PRD, QA second->transportate the request up to QA and DEV is the last one and don't need to transportate.
1- configuring prefix to PRD system
- On DEV system, go to the maintain prefix number OOW4 and change the column SAP System to PRD system, change Client to the client used on PRD system and save;
- Transportate the request;
- at the end of these steps you will be production prefix number is already configured.
2- configuring prefix to QA system
- On DEV system, go to the maintain prefix number OOW4 and change the column SAP System to QA system, change Client to the client used on QA system and save;
- Transportate the request;
- at the end of these steps you will be QA prefix number is already configured.
3- configuring prefix to DEV system again.
- On DEV system, go to the maintain prefix number OOW4 and change the column SAP System to DEV system, change Client to the client used on DEV system and save;
- Here don't need to Transportate the request, but here on DEV you can change to another one when you need to transportate in the future;
- at the end of these steps you will be DEV prefix number is already configured.
best regards,
Glauco
Message was edited by:
Glauco Kubrusly

Workflow - Prefix Number DEV/QUA/PRO

Hi friends,
I'm configuring a wf and I'm transporting it from DEV to QUA. I know that I have to configurate the Prefix Number to tasks. I've created it to DEV and it was transported. But it doesn't work.
Do I need to create a new prefix to use on QUA and after that ... a new to PRO too ?

I'm trying to configurate the workflow on QUA 'cause I've already developd and configurated it on DEV, ok ?
so, I'm trying to configurate on QUA on transaction SWU3 witch is saying me that I have to configurate the prefixes for this client. So I'm using OOW4 for this. On OOW4, I'm trying to configure this so the wf system accept and know the tasks I've configurated on DEV on QUA system too.
Problems:
1-I remember now that I've already configurated it on DEV, creating a 990 prefix to tasks, so, I've created all standard tasks (on pftc: this tasks, in a wf, call an object method crteated on swo1) on DEV with this prefix 990...1, 990...2, etc.
2-On QUA System, for these tasks, I have to set the responsables again on QUA too, so I'm not archiving this objective, coz sap say I haven't autorization for this.
3-Each task, I have to set the responsable on QUA now.... but when I enter to set it, it doesn't show the line with yellow color with the description "general task"... too.
an another problem (How to set a user on a background task witch executes a MIGO, so sap system is setting with WF-BATCH on MIGO) I'm post in the forum now.
waiting for reply... thanks.
Glauco

Database creation problem on Windows XP

Hello Readers
I have installed ORACLE Database Engine on windows XP.
I am facing problem in database creation.
I have tryed wizard as well as mannual method.
in wizard at 90% it gives an error "END-OF-FILE ON COMMUNICATION CHANNEL"
although CD drive is in CR Rom drive.
Please help me ....
Rashid Masood Ashraf
email: [email protected]

After going to the properties as you suggested:
Right now the Obtain an IP address automatically is checked
I need to check the Use the following IP address:
What should I enter for
IP address:
Subnet mask:
Default gateway:
Please help.
Edited by: Nel Marcus on Dec 2, 2008 3:49 PM

Remittance challan creation problem in Cross company code scenario.

I made to Advance payment to Cross comany code while posting time we deduct the TDS amount. at the time remiottance challan creation i got bellow error.please help to me
No unpaid tax lines exist for the given selection criteria.
Message no. 8I702
Diagnosis
The corresponding withholding tax line &1& is not present in WITH_ITEM table.
System Response
For withholding tax recovered from the vendor, tax line is present in table BSIS, but the corresponding entry is missing in table WITH_ITEM , which is necessary for challan updation. Check the entries.
Procedure
check entries in table WITH_ITEM for the open tax items chosen for clearing.
Edited by: TEEGALA SATISH on Jun 15, 2010 5:43 PM

Hi ...Actually i am getting same problem in challan creation.. Did you get any solution? ...

Process order creation problem

I am creating a process order . while creating the process order system is throwing error as Auto batch numbering not set up for material type XXXX in plant xxxx . System is not allowing to create process order.
How to resolve the issue.

Check in CORW and switch off batch creation to isolate the problem if needed. Also see whether you have any batch managed compoents for which you have set master data for automatic batch determination.
There is no setting for material types and plant for batch. May be the error message is not correct. What is the message number?

Automatically inbound delibery creation problem

Hi!
I'm using workflow ws12300004 to create automatically an inbound delibery after the goods issue posting in outbound delibery in a cross-company stock transfer. (WM storages with HU)
Workflow uses function module SHP_IBDLV_CREATE_FROM_OBDLV.
This workflow works great if i set in spro transaction, in Materials Management/Purchasing/confirmations/Define internal confirmation categories:
Intern. Confirm. Cat.      Conf.Cat.         Description               Del. Type
Shipping Notification              LA          Inbound delivery            EL
But if I change 'EL' for 'HID', workflow doesn´t work, and I get the error HUFUNCTIONS 189:
Item &1 &2 cannot be used for HU &3
where &1 is $   1
          &2 is 0000010
and     &3 is HU number
The complete description of the error is:
                                                                                Short Text
Item &1 &2 cannot be used for HU &3
Diagnosis
A HU item in handling unit is to be assigned to item of the object .
The HU item cannot be assigned because of differences in the material
     data.
Procedure
Check the stock data of the document item or assign a different handling
     unit.
Any idea about what's happening?
Regards,
Moisés
Edited by: Moisés Lorenzo on Oct 20, 2008 4:47 PM

Hi!
Question answered.
I went to spro/logistics execution/shipping/Deliveries/Define item categories for deliveries.
And then I set the Movement Type for delivery type 'HIDN'.
That solves the problem.

New Excise Invoice Creation - Problem

Hi All,
I am facing problem in creation of Excise Invoice. I dont know the step by step process, can any one help me to get this ?
Best Regards
Chintesh Soni

Hi Chintesh,
if you are referring to a 100% tax invoice, please see note [887917|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/887917] for 2 workarounds.
All the best,
Kerstin

Approval workflow for creation of organization

Hi,
I need to configure an approval workflow for the creation of organization. When the admin tries to create a new org, the approval should go to a admin group. The org should get created only once approval is done. I have configured an approval workflow for the Xellerate Organization resource object. I have created an unconditional task where the assignment tab has the admin group. When I test it, the org gets created without going through the approval process. Could someone please tell me what am I missing?
Thanks,
Supreetha
Edited by: Supreetha on Jan 22, 2011 8:38 AM

You'll have to raise request for Dummy Organization. It's Order for Organization so will not appear for user.
I am not sure the full flow/complete requirement of your.
APMU, you want approval while creating Organization into OIM.
This is not possible OOTb when you create ORg in OIM.
You'll create 1 dummy Org
1 Dummy RO "OFO".
Attach one Object Form with this RO.
Raise request for Dummy Org and Give the name of Org on the object form for which you want approval.
In the provisioning workflow, use OIM API to create Org into OIM.
Done !!!

Logical Standby Creation Problems "Create STatus Unknown"

We are using Grid Control 10.2.0.3 on Oracle 10.2..0.3 databases, Windows 2003 sp2 machines.
We have a primary and fsfo physical standby working properly. We went to create a logical standby on a separate server and had problems. it turned out that the listener on the server was not discovered on the target. we fixed that problem and finished the creation of the logical standby and it seems to be functioning properly now.
However, the status on the data guard page for the logical standby shows Create Status Unknown and we are unable to proceed on to create an additional standby database for other purposes. We have tried removing the logical standby target and re-discovering it but status still shows Create Status Unknown.
Is there any way to clear this status without having to drop the logical standby and completely recreate it.

The status on the agent shows it uploading successfully.
We resolved the issue by removing the logical standby from the configuration and selecting to retain the log apply. We then re-added the standby selecting to manage an existing standby database and the status went to normal.

Date of creation problem after making Bridge create TIFs with PS Image Processor.

I went through about 100 files and did what I wanted in Camera RAW (started out with NEFs). Thereafter I had Bridge make TIFs of all the files in the folder using the PS Image Processor.
Now, looking at the TIF folder in Bridge, I find that about 80 of them has a wrong creation date (I checked the Preferences and I have asked for the date of creation - and not the date of modification). As I watch (several minutes) Bridge changes some of the dates to the ones known to me to be correct - but not all. If I close Bridge, restart Bridge and open the folder again the same happens, i.e. it starts all over. Even stranger is that the Windows Pathfinder have problems with the same files - i.e. does not show the date of creation at all.
The date of these 80 files are all the same - and they have been edited over several days!
I have done a lot of work on those files and would hate to start all over. I checked and of course the dates are the original in the RAW folder that I started out with.
I am sure that I do not have any bugs in my PC.
Can I remedy this i any way? I hate to have wrong dates on my files.
What can I have done to cause this? Can anyone help me? Thanking You in advance.
Git

Thank You again.
Yes, I have also purged the cache. More than once and again this morning. It does not change the result. Bridge still goes from the date January 13th 2013 to the correct date of creation when I look at the separate thumbnails - and back again when I scroll down the page and subsequently scroll up again!
Thus it seems that Bridge knows the date that the camera set but somehow this foolish January date keeps coming back.
All the folders with NEFs have correct dates - also the ones where I have imported the files from camera to pc in 2013! Only my TIFFs have this problem.
Rigth now I am having Norton 360 run a complete system scan. When that is done I will inactivate Norton (I know that I cannot have 2 antivirus softwares and firewalls run simultaneously on the PC) and instead run a complete scan with Lavasoft Adaware Pro. I have also used Norton Utilities and found no problems. Plus Malwarebytes Antimalware and Superantispyware. No problems.
If "date file created" is the date that the file was modified, it would not help me much. I often go back to a file and play with it again and if I have understood correctly, then this date would change again. I want to see the date of capture ("date created"). Also, by now the problem afflicts at least 1000 files. It would be impossible to do single file manual corrections of dates on so many files.
Update: While I have been writing this, an opened folder with only 36 files has changed the dates to the correct date of capture. I could also scroll up and down without the dates changíng in this small folder. But when I closed Bridge, restarted it and looked at the folder again Bridge again did need minutes to get all the dates rigth. Maybe I have a pc capacity problem instead of a software problem? But why on earth would this specific wrong date result from a too weak pc.?
Maybe I should just give up and reinstall PS?
Sorry if I trouble You with a ridiculous problem.
Git

Workflow - Schedule Manager problem

Hi,
I have configured a flow definition task in Schedule Manager (SAP 4.7, IDES system). After the immediately execution I got a very strange dump:
Syntax error in program "CL_SWF_RUN_WIM_LOCAL==========CP
The following syntax error occurred in the program
CL_SWF_RUN_WIM_LOCAL==========CP :
"You can only define attributes in the PUBLIC, PROTECTED or PRIVATE sec"
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "CL_SWF_RUN_WIM_FACTORY========CP" had to be
terminated because one of the statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
How can I manage the workflow integration? As I see this is not a SCMA problem, maybe this is a workflow setting problem!?
Any help in this much appreciated.
Thanks,
Miki

Hi Mikkel,
Thanks your answer. In my view SWU3 is OK:
- Maintain runtime environment is green
- Maintain definition environment is green
- Maintain additional settings and services is green
- Classify tasks as general is green
Have you got any other idea? Unfortunately, I tried this flow definition in an other SAP 4.7 IDES sandbox system, but I got this dump again.
Kind regards,
Miklos

Workflow Prefix creation problem.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for