Workflow rule transporting problem

Hi,
When i am trying to transport rule to from dev system to client system it is not getting copied can any body tell how to copy the rule data from dev to c system

Hi!!!
Thanks for ur prompt helps. Actually instead of OBJECTID I was passing the Obj-key and not the OBJECTID. This was creating problem. But still dont know why it was creating the prob.
Anyways THANKS A LOT.
Regards,
Sudipto.

Similar Messages

Workflow controlled transports

Hi all,
I have a 4 system test ladscape with a virtual system (4th ) in between quality and production. I m trying to configure Workflow controlled transports. I have chosen one system in the landscape to act as the work flow engine. The configuration is complete.
I login to my development system as user developer with dev rights and create a request. Once i release the request a transport proposal is automatically created, here i choose the target system as QAS. I then login as admin to my QAS system and navidate to my TMS worklist where i can see this request.
When i approve the request the import starts and when i reject the request i get a message saying that a message was sent to the owner of that request that the request has been rejected.
As per SAP documentation the developer can login to DEV system and can see his inbox thru SE09. The problem i am facing here is that there is no message listed in developers inbox stating that my request was rejected.
I am not able to find any sol/doc for this problem, has any one seen this b4 ?
thanks !.

SAP Note : 313991
Due to the approval of a request in the QAS system, this becomes
active in the import queue of system VDE (status: Request is ready
for import). Refused requests receive the following status:
Request was refused.
o The RSTMS_DIST_APPROVED_REQUESTS program is used to transfer the
requests with the status "Request is ready for import" from the VDE
import queue to the supply system of VDE (that is, the PRD
production system or, if necessary, several production systems and
clients) and then to delete them from the import queue of VDE.
Refused requests (status: Request was refused) are also deleted
from the VDE queue.
You can choose between the following options:
- Transfer all approved requests:
All approved requests from the VDE queue which are before the
end are transfermark (stop mark) red. All requests that have
not yet been processed with the QA procedure remain in the VDE
queue until a decision (approval or refusal) has been made.
cheers
dEE

Unable to evaluate workflow rule - Value too long for field

Need help with a workflow error for a record update before the record is saved. There are 3 calculations that would be done in a particular order - all on number fields. Each time, I am overwriting existing values. The individual numbers could have up to 6 decimal spaces. When I try to update one or more fields that contain the calculation, I get an error message saying that the system is unable to evaluate the workflow rule - value too long for field (zNum6).
This same calculation is fine when a new record is entered and the calculation is done as a default field value.
Any ideas?

I actually had to use a ToChar function at the beginning of the calculation and #### to indicate the number of digits to make this work. Oracle Help Desk provided the answer - quickly.

Create opportunity using workflow rule

Hi,
Is there a way to create an opportunity record using a workflow rule.
We want to be able to create a service opportunity to be triggered automatically by the sales person by either updating a flag or check box which inturn triggers
a workflow rule that can create an opportunity.
I am aware of using a web link to copy an existing opportunity.
Any ideas ?
Thanks
Swami

At this time this is possible by using Integration Events and using web services. CRMOD does not support Workflows that will automatically create an opportunity using a workflow

Transformation transport problems when containing routine

Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a transport problem.
When i want to transport a transformation that contains routines, the transport says syntax error in routine. The routine in DEV is tested and correct. I realised, that the transport does not bring the routines. After transport, i open the transformation, and the routines contain the default routine: RESULT = .
I found some answers in some posts, but no exact answer how can i get rid of this transport problem. I don't like copy - paste into prod system with manually editing....
If you have any idea, please let me know.
Thanks
Laszlo

Thanks for your help, it worked now, but i think it should work without owerwrite originals. Sometimes it seems that the routines is not included in the transport request, when i modify a routine in a transformation.
But thanks anyway, problem solved now

Workflow rules doesn't work for existing record!!?!?!?

Hi all,
I've created one workflow rule to update value from one filed to another. Here is my expression:
[<QuickSearch1>] <> [<plStatus_ITAG>]
and my action is
field name = "*Status" (QuickSearch1)
Value = <plStatus_ITAG>
and I tick on the Overwrite the existing value
This is work for new record, but for the existing one the field value doesn't chnage. Any suggestion??
Thanks
Note

The syntax should be: PRE('< QuickSearch1>') <> [<QuickSearch1>] for the condition.

Help writing a workflow rule

Hello Experts!!!
I need help writing a workflow rule condition to trigger the workflow. What I am aiming for is an email to be sent out when an opportunity is marked Closed/Won. But it can only be of a certain opportunity type (we use three options) and opportunity sub-type (we use two options) (these are custom fields we use)
Below are the fields that need to be used:
[<SalesStage>] = Closed/Won
[<OpportunityType>] = Acute
[<plOpportunity_SubType_ITAG>] = Tech
Thanks Again!!

Hi
Try:
[<SalesStage>] = Closed/Won AND [<OpportunityType>] = Acute AND [<plOpportunity_SubType_ITAG>] ='Tech'
Note that in case of picklists it is recomended to use the lookup value and not static text like 'Tech', but both will work.
Good luck
Guy

How to write workflow rules/expressions/SQL

Hi all.
We are recent users of CRM onDemand, we would like to write some workflow rules but cannot seem to find any information on how to do this. The help section is limited in answers, and some of the questions here are also not specific to what we would like to do.
Does anyone have any advice on books, web sites, etc. on where to find the knowledge we need on how to write the workflow rules and use SQL and expressions in CRM on Demand?
Thanks in advance!!

For your first case:
1. You cannot create a workflow in r15 for activity but in R16 you can
Create new to create a workflow
Name: Auto email send
record type: activity
trigger: when new record saved
rules: put your rules by clicking on the fx icon i.e this is where you are entering the rule saying the owner is different from the person who is creating the activity or the delegated field is filled (another way of looking at it)
then save the workflow
In the actions section
choose the action "Create Email Notification"
In the To: Section choose "Relative User on Record" and Choose "Activity Owner"
Save it. Make sure both the workflow and activity are marked active.
2. In your second scenario:
How do you expect to create an account and automatically populate the Sales rep's name - not sure
But you can create an opportunity and auto fill with the Account Owner's name by using this in the field validation (you do not need the workflow), you can use the FieldValueJoin function.
Hope this helps - btb there is no book you can go thro the help and you will find some directions

Workflow Rule Condition : impact of the "LookupValue"

Hello,
I would like to know something about he "LookupValue" (eg.1) impact in the "workflow rule condition". What is exactly the role of the "LookupValue"? Does it have an impact if I decide to delete it and just write the value needed (eg. 2) ?
eg.1 : ... =LookupValue("OCC_CUST_LOV_OPTY_4", "Value Needed")
eg.2 : ... =("Value Needed")
Could someone help me?
Thanks and regards.
Edited by: user5840933 on 5 mars 2009 03:44

Hi !
The lookupValue function is very useful. Imagine you created 10 workflows with a condition such as : PICKLIST="Value".
Then imagine you have to modify the "Value" of this picklist in "Value2" for example. This means you will have to update your 10 workflows to put "Value2" instead of "Value".
Using the LookupValue function, it will automatically get the picklist value based on the code corresponding to the value.
LookupValue(PICKLIST, "A") will return the value corresponding to the code "A", no matter what the value is.
In the expression builder, after chosing the field in the picklist, click on the link "Get acceptable values". Then click on a value and the LookupValue function will appear in your expression.
Hope this will help, feel free to ask more !
Max
[See Mike L announcement|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/ann.jspa?annID=883]

Re: Workflow controlled Transport Strategy

Hi friends,
we are using workflow controlled transport strategy in our landscape. So far we are using existing help help.sap.com to configure the same. But we found that it is not enough for completing configuration in perspective of out client requirement. Can anybody help to get the more help on this?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
thanks,
krishna

SAP Note : 313991
Due to the approval of a request in the QAS system, this becomes
active in the import queue of system VDE (status: Request is ready
for import). Refused requests receive the following status:
Request was refused.
o The RSTMS_DIST_APPROVED_REQUESTS program is used to transfer the
requests with the status "Request is ready for import" from the VDE
import queue to the supply system of VDE (that is, the PRD
production system or, if necessary, several production systems and
clients) and then to delete them from the import queue of VDE.
Refused requests (status: Request was refused) are also deleted
from the VDE queue.
You can choose between the following options:
- Transfer all approved requests:
All approved requests from the VDE queue which are before the
end are transfermark (stop mark) red. All requests that have
not yet been processed with the QA procedure remain in the VDE
queue until a decision (approval or refusal) has been made.
cheers
dEE

Open Hub transporting problems

Hi everybody, we have Open Hub transporting problems, it just gives us return code 12 or 8, basically, it doen't want to transport neither Open Hub Destination, nor Transformations, nor DTPs, and bear in mind that we're on the 15th Patch Level. We've looked at all the SAP Notes, but they reffer to the earlier patch levels...
And other problem, is that it's OK in DEV system but in QUALITY system, when you launch a DTP it gives us a dumb with ASSIGN_TYPE_ERROR
Any ideas??

My destination path on the DEV box is simply the following (identified by BID in the following path):
D:\usr\sap\BID\DVEBMGS00\work
And when I locate the un-activated open hub on the QA box, the BID is already changed to BIQ, but the server name box/field is empty....
I am going to try with the object changebility option, btw, is there any documentation on how to change these objects that are marked with object changebility on the QA box (provided that we can not manually change anything on the QA box)...
Anyways, I think my problem is with the server name conversion from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa"....!!!
Also, please note the RSBFILE entry for this object in the QA box has the "btcsrvname" as blank...
Do you think there is any additional setting that needs to be done on the QA box to do this translation (from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa")?
The only two setup we have done as far as the BI is concerned is at the "Tools-> Conversion of logical system name"....where you only put the conversion for client name mapping from dev to qa and local file system mapping from dev to qa.
So, is there anything else to map the host name (from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa") either at BI perspective or Basis/NetWeaver perspective?
Thanks a lot...
~Sabuj.
Edited by: Sabuj Haque on Feb 1, 2009 1:11 PM
Edited by: Sabuj Haque on Feb 1, 2009 5:34 PM

The Object cannot not be processed due to a transport problem

We are trying to delete a standard web template 0ADHOC_TABLE (modified by our coworker before and transported) and reinstall a new one or totally standard one, but when clicking the "X" icon to delete this web template, get the following error:
"The Object cannot not be processed due to a transport problem"
What could be the reason?
Thanks

Hi Kevin,
This message coms up because as you mention, the template has been transported. Since it is in the target system, if you delete form the dev system, the system needs to ensure that it is also removed from the system it has been transported too.
You can check the dev package assigned to the template, assign a new request against this dev class (RSA1 > Transport Connection > Bex Truck icon). Log out and log back into WAD and try to delete it, and then send this transport. Or you can simply reinstall it as Roberto suggests.
Hope this helps...

Help with applescript/workflow/rule that would unflag mail when read (...)

Here's my scenario:
I have quite many mail.app rules that automatically filter and file incoming mails from newsletters, SNS, work, friends etc. and they all go in specific mailboxes (200+)
I also have some rules that I trigger using MailActOn.
Since with Lion theres now 6 different flags (and that you can rename them) I've included them in the rules actions and set them up to the following categories:
- To Do
- To Do Later
- To File
- News
- Personal
This actually allows me to have these smart mailboxes to appear only when they are flags active.
Now for the first three I want to keep the flags permanently until I'm actully done with them.
But for the "news" and "personal" ones I want to have them "unflag" once I read them.
So to recap, is there a way to systematicall/periodically unflag messages when they are read from specific mailboxes or if they are flagged with a particular flag?
I'd really appreciate if someone would help me out figure out an adequate solution to what I'd like to achieve.
I'm not sure if a kind of a combination of either applescript/workflow/rule would actually make it work...

Here's my scenario:
I have quite many mail.app rules that automatically filter and file incoming mails from newsletters, SNS, work, friends etc. and they all go in specific mailboxes (200+)
I also have some rules that I trigger using MailActOn.
Since with Lion theres now 6 different flags (and that you can rename them) I've included them in the rules actions and set them up to the following categories:
- To Do
- To Do Later
- To File
- News
- Personal
This actually allows me to have these smart mailboxes to appear only when they are flags active.
Now for the first three I want to keep the flags permanently until I'm actully done with them.
But for the "news" and "personal" ones I want to have them "unflag" once I read them.
So to recap, is there a way to systematicall/periodically unflag messages when they are read from specific mailboxes or if they are flagged with a particular flag?
I'd really appreciate if someone would help me out figure out an adequate solution to what I'd like to achieve.
I'm not sure if a kind of a combination of either applescript/workflow/rule would actually make it work...

Transport Problem - for KEDR Derivation rule

We are trying to create derivation rule through transaction KEDR without any values. After creating derivation rule, it is creating workbench transport request eventhough K9RE* table is client dependent.
We have different transport routes/groups for customizing and workbench. SAP Layer is assinged to workbench transport group with one another Z* layer.
When we are trying to create request it is creating workbench transport request eventhough it is client dependent. It is using KEG0 package which is assinged to SAP layer.
Workbench transport are not going to all clients and we have to move request manually to other clients.
What should we do for changing this behaviour?
Thanks,
Miral.

With detailed explanation:
I thing previous post with was not detailed enough. Please see below.
We have created two different transport group for differentiating
customizing and workbench transport request.
ZECD layer is assigned to /CUST/ group where as ZWBK and SAP layer is
assinged to /WRKB/ group.
We are moving all client independent transports (assigned to /WRKB/
group) to only 1 client in other systems.
While creating derivation rule through transaction KEDR, it is not
allowing us to assing /CUST/ group eventhough config is client dependent.
It is using package KEG0 which is assinged to SAP layer and SAP layer isassinged to /WRKB/ group in our configuration.
The Derivation rule config is client dependent eventhough it is creatingworkbench request. We would like to know why it is creating workbench
request instead of customizing request.
Thanks,
Miral.

Query Transportation Problem?

Hi Guru's,
We are working in Bw 3.5 Version
Query: We have observed that there was a problem with Query in Dev & Quality Server?
as per the regular activities we have modeled the entire process in Dev
from data Source to Data target
then we have developed a report on this data target.
all this was saved under one Request and transported to Quality.
then there was some modifications in update rules & and also in Bex report
for this also we have sent under one request to Quality
there we have observed that the modifications in update rules have been applied
& in report this modifications did nnot apply in Quality server
Can any one help in this ............
advance thanks ,very very urgent..
Points will be rewarded >
Hari

Hi,
I have the same problem. I have a query in production and I need to change it. I changed it in dev, transported the query with no error, but I don't see the changes in prod.
There is any configuration error? Normal transports work fine.
Thanks

Workflow rule transporting problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for