Wrong accounting entries @ time custom miro
HI expert
I am performing, custom miro for Asset import, when at the time of sumulating i am getting A/C
Custom a/c
To captital consumption
my captital consumption is g/l wich i have use in PO in account assignment tab.
The correct entries hve to
Custom a/c
To CVD clearing a/c
Customs clearing a/c
Regard
Nabil
Hi,
It seems that system is directly trying to book the cost to consumption acct the time of Invoice.
This scenario may happen if there is no goods receipt expected for the Purchase Order.
Can you please check the " GR non valuated " and "Goods receipt" indicators in the purchase Orders.
Rajesh
Similar Messages
-
Wrong Accounting entries in Import Procurement
Hi SAP Experts,
I m facing 2 issues of wrong accounting entries in Import procurement.
1) Vendor field is not showing while making PO in item Condition details for Additional duty condition type.
2) Secondly the accounting entries may be coming wrong in GR, for ur Ref:
PO- details with Acc keys mentioned for Condition types
P001
Ex works Price
100
USD
1
NO
1,000.00
ZINS
Ins Charges Val/Qty
6
USD
1
NO
60
FR1
ZFRA
Sea/Air Frieght
6
USD
6
FR1
ZFRI
Freight Inland
1
USD
1
FR1
ZGRS
% Gross
12
USD
12
FR1
Assessable Value
107.9
USD
1
NO
1,079.00
JCDB
IN Basic customs
10
107.90
FR3
JCV1
IN CVD
3
35.61
FR3
ZECS
Education Cess
2
0.71
FR3
ZSEC
Secondary Edu. Cess
1
0.36
FR3
ZSAD
Additional Duties
1
12.24
FR3
Total
123.58
USD
1
NO
1,235.82
ZCLR
Clearing Charges
4
49.43
FR3
SKTO
Cash Discount
0
0
Total Landed Cost
128.53
USD
1
NO
1,285.25
& when i did MIGO below mentioned entries occurred.
1
89
22623000
O&M MAT-TRANSFORMERS
1,285.25
USD
2
96
22200000
GR/IR CLG A/C-DOM
1,081.74-
USD
3
50
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
60.00-
USD
4
96
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
107.90-
USD
5
96
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
35.61-
USD
Here only JCDB, JCV1 & ZINS amounts are going to freight clearing, rest is adding in GR/IR clearing account.
Why is it so?Hi Dhinakaraj,
We have assigned Freight clearing accounts to tax accounts for testing purpose only, as FI guy was not here, n we are not getting any GL account for enteries check, we will change it later on with the exact tax accounts, but my question is that i have assigned accr keys to 10 condition types (4 FR1 & 6 FR3) ideally these conditions should hit frieght clearing account at the time of GR, but only few are hitting ( JCDB, JCV1 & ZINS ), why it is so ?
The GR/IR Account entry value should be 1000.00-
Correct me if i am wrong. -
Wrong Accounting Entry for Rejection Excise Invoice through J1IS
Dear Experts,
When we are doing Rejection of Excise Invoice through J1IS, a wrong accounting entry is getting generated by system.
Where can I check the settings for Accounting Entry for Rejection Excise Invoice?
Thanks & Regards,
ReshmaGenerally Excise Invoice for other invoice posting will be done through J1IV after creating Excise Invoice for other Movements in J1IS.
If Automatic Posting is activated against your excise group then you need not again to post J1IV. It happens along with J1IS.
By the by how you are returning Excisable goods through Return delivery with Original invoice 122 or through Return Purchase order 161 Movement type.
Have you entered Excise Rates BED, ECS and SECS in J1IS?
Elaborate in detail. -
Wrong accounting entry for FRB2 (Freight Value)
Dear All,
Wrong accounting entry is happening for Freight value for a standard PO.
Rs. 300 was maintained in PO for this condition type, GR is done for full qty. but Accounting entry is Material cccount Rs. 156.24 to Freight clearing account.
Please help me on this issue
Regards
Prashant AtriPO was created with 3 line items with each line item having freight condition type FRB2 - Freight value
For first line item it is Rs.200 for 1,008 quantity
For Second line item it is Rs.300 for 7,200 quantity
For Third line item it is Rs.300 for 2,604 quantity
GR was done for 3rd line item for the entire PO quantity 2604, but the frieght value is flowing only Rs. 156.24
1) Material is valuated at Standard Price.
It is Valuated at MAP
2)Condition type- FRB2- Rs 300 is entered at the Header Level and it is marked as a Group condition because of which it got apportioned to all the line items in the Purchase Order.
It is entered line itemwise with Rs.300 to the third particular line item and there is wrong flow of freight value for other line items too in GR.
Is Freight Condition type is a header condition and also check is it a group condition ( in t.code: M/06)
It is a header condition but not group condition and the values for frieght were given line item wise.
Need help to resolve this.
Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:14 PM
Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:15 PM -
Cancel the Credit memo genarating wrong accounting entry
Hello,
We are facing when we Cancel sales credit memo credit memo genarating wrong accounting document entry in production system.
Same scenorio i have replicated in quality system and working fine.
I have checked the billing type for credit memo s1 and cancel credit memo in quality system and production system configuration is same why it' hitting wrongly.
Cancel credit memo is hitting document type RV instead of AB in production system but same it's correctly in quality system.
I have checked the oba7,vofa.
Please provide the clarification.
Regards,
SatyaHello,
For document type RV we have maintained reverse document type AB.
For document type AB we have maintained reverse document type AB.
S1 is billing document type we can not map in OBA7 with documen type RV.
Please give me your inputs.
regards,
Satya -
Auto clearing of Accounting entries posted via MIRO & MR8M
Hi Gurus,
Currently we are doing the development relating to u201CDuplicate Invoice checku201D.
In one of the scenario system is referring the Accounting document of the cancelled MIRO.
Subject accounting document is there in the open items (FBL1N) and the corresponding reversal accounting document (Generated via MR8M) is also reflecting in the Open items (FBL1N).
MIRO documents get cancelled via T-code u2013 MR8M & the Material documents shows the cancelled / relevant document reference against each other.
Since both of our accounting document (generated via MIRO & MR8M) are appearing in Open items system is referring that in our Duplicate Invoice check development which we want to avoid.
If I am not wrong, in case of SD Billing document if we reversed, system automatically cancelled the relevant accounting document against each other.
Does anybody have an idea as how to clear these 2 accounting documents (MIRO & MR8M) against each other ?
Regards,
ShridharHi Prasad,
Thanks for the option but we had aready given a though about clearing the Vendor line items.
In stead of F-44, we can set the F.13, background scheduling with daily execution and can clear the documents. Background execution in the night will occupy our space hence need instant result if possible. As well as background execution will happend in the timing after office hours so could be the case that before doing auto clearing someone may get the concern cancelled accounting document pertaining to the cancelled MIRO (Vendor Invoice - Line item) in the open items.
While doing the MR8M (Logistic Inv Reversal) alongwith Material Document reversal can we clear the accounting documents instantly on its own against each other ?
Regards,
Shridhar -
MIRO showing wrong accounting entries
Dear Forum,
While doing MIRO for PO(Account assigned),one unwanted amount is flowing into accounting doc..PO contains ST,Ecess,HEcess conditiion types and MIGO contains GL Acc to GR/IR clearing acc..Now while simulating MIRO,its accounting doc is showing Vendor to GR/IR acc,ST,Ecess,HEcess and some amount related to GL acc given in SES...
Kindly provide me the details from which areas the amount can get flow to MIRO.
Waiting for your helpful replies...
Kindly revert in case issue not clear
Regards
Nainesh
SAP ECC 6.0HI,
Check have you given any Fright condition types in Po and , check condition types in PO and also In MIGO also.
Other wise send clearly the PO conditions, MIGO acco Doc and Miro SimulTION ALSO.
rEGARDS,
Andra -
PLEASE CHECK ACCOUNTUNG DOC . THIS WAS REVERSED VIDE DOCUMENT NO ENTIRE REVERSAL ENTRY IS DIFFERENT THAN ORIGINAL ENTRY. REVERSAL DONE WITH MR8M.WHY PURCHASE OFFSET AND PRD ACCOUNT IS HIITING WHEN I M DOING MR8M
HI,
Please check your MIRO accounting document using transaction FB03 or using MIR4 transaction.
If you have activated Purchase account management, same will be hit when you do GR, Invoice verification as well as reversal.
Thanks & Regards, -
In Import Purchase - GR Accounitn Entry Varying From custom MIRO
Hi SAP Exeprt,
Sensing abnormal behaviour of PRD client in case of Import Procurement.
which are as follow;
Import PO with Exchange rate ( 44.17) Multiple items. Exchange rate is not fixed in PO ( transaction flows are as such)
1. Custom MIRO for 5 Qty. in INR where Accouting Entry are as such;
Vendor 10000 C
Custom Clearing 9100 D
Custom Clearing 600 D
Custom Clearing 300 D
2. GR for 5 Qty. w.r.t PO & Commerai lInvoice ( MIRO Doc. No.)
Stock Account 69570( INR) 1119.20 D (EUR)
GR/IR 58000 933.07 C
Custom Clearing 10300 165.70 C
Custom Clearing 850 13.67 C
Custom Clearing 420 6.75 C
Here My MIGO Clearing account should get match with MIRO Custom Clearing Account, which is not haaping, even though exchange rate from OB08 is also not matching.
I am not able to , how & on which parameter system is calculating material value in EUR as well as in EUR.
As per the Standard practice, AT GR Level. Stock Account will be posted as per PO Material Value in Foreign Currency & in INR coversion from OB08 Table. Custom Clearing calculation as per Custom MIRO Clearing Value & in turn INR Value will be converted in Foreign Currency.
Note: For 1 Qty, System is calculating as per SAP standard but for Multiple qty, System is generating wrong accounting entry while posting GR.
I have simulated it on Quality & Development client , systen is working fine in both for 1 Qty as well as for Mutliple Qty case.
Dear Experts help me to resolve this issue.
With Regards,
Manoj K.I am not able to , how & on which parameter system is
calculating material value in EUR as well as in EUR.
Check SAP Note 518114 - FAQ: Goods movements in foreign currency
From your account postings of GR,Customs miro
Customs miro entries are ok,In GR customs a/c entries reflecting duties
which are not taken credit will add to material value.
Note: For 1 Qty, System is calculating as per SAP standard but for Multiple qty,
System is generating wrong accounting entry while posting GR.
Take help of FICO consultant why acct. entries were wrong,
Check any transport requests which were not moved to production,
since it is working fine in other two clients.
Can you tell me how much GR qty will receive every time & also for customs clearing qty ?
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 15, 2010 10:13 PM -
Accounting Entries for Materials Return from Production Order
Dear Gurus,
I have a scenario here that a raw material, valuated at moving average = 151 and qty = 100, was issued to a production order last month. Due to some issue the order was not completed for a while and 93 qty was consumed for the order and because the remaining 7 were excess they were returned to the storage location. By that time the MOV had changed from 151 to 185 and the 7 qty was returned not at 151 (which would be correct) but at 185. This is a wrong accounting entry as it is showing an under consumption for the order.
Anyone have an idea why the system is doing this because the material should be returned on the price it was issued at so that the accounting entries are knocked off (The accounting entries for return deliveries to vendors are of the same price that they are recieved no matter how ever long a period they are returned). How do we stop the system from doing so and if it cannot be done what is the solution to the scenario.
Regards,The normal entires are as follows (depending on your configuration);
1) Goods issue;
Credit inventory and debit COGS;
2) Billing document;
Debit customer account credit sales accounts;
3) Payment;
Credit customer account and debit cash/ checking account
pls assign points if helpful as a way to say thanks. -
Wrong Part2 Entry for GRPO IP transaction
Hi,
I want to avail the 100% ADC which is passed by the dealer, it is import purchase from domestic dealer,
So I Captured and Posted Excise Invoice in MIGO, with selecting IP sub transaction,
But the part2 entries shows wrong Accounting entry , The accounting document generated for last line item only, I have two line item in MIGO, there is no accounting entry for first line item,
I also checked the J_1IPART2 and J_1IEXCHDR table , but values were different for BED,
I reproduced the same scenario in testing, and found that when you have only one item in MIGO the entries were correct, but if there were more than one item in MIGO that time the accounting entry generated for only last line item
Need your help on this issue,Dear KJ,
Can you check PO for both line items JEXC and JADC has value.
Refer the note.
964190
- ADC on domestic purchase of imported goods
Check whether you are following correct process from this note.
Regards
Binoy -
Vat% in Accounting Entry
Hi All,
I have a requirement related to accounting entry, i have one process where i need to maintain 0% vat on sales item. it is for this reason i had maintain one tax code with 0% condition record at when i m creating invoice the accounting entry is generate without tax mean this 0% is not coming in accounting entry is there any possibility to retain 0% tax with accounting entry like
customer a/c debit 1000
sale of traded goods 1000-
vat 0% 0-
please help to resolve this issue.
thanks in advance
Regards
Vivek SharmaHi Vivek,
I had a simillar issue. As per that requirement we need to have a new tax condition type. Hence the existing tax condition type should be made as 0 % in the condition record. As a result of it, the accounting entry was having :
customer a/c debit 1000
sale of traded goods 1000-
Vat (New Condition type) - 10 %.
The conclusion is that it is SAP standard.
Also, please let me know under which scenario you want the 0 % VAT to be displayed in the accounting document.
Regards -
Accounting Entries at the time of MIRO
Dear All,
Please help me to map the following scenario.
Co code A and co code B are assigned to the one company.
Now co code A sends the PO the co code B. Co code B will do IV.
Now client wants at the time of MIRO in co code B normal (Standard) entry should pass in co code B Plus he wants to pass the entry which will debit A/R in code A.
How it is possible?
Thanks & Regards,
Reva.Hi
Create settings at TCode OBYA.
Cheers
Srinivas -
Third Party Miro accounting Entries
Hi all
what is the accounting entries after MIRO in third party process
Where material delivered from Vendor to Customer directly and vendor bill to company
Edited by: sandipamore on Sep 21, 2011 8:45 AMHello
Accounting entries for 3rd Party Sales:
After MIRO
Vendor Account - Cr
GR/IR Clearing A/c - Dr
After VF01
Customer Account - Dr
Sales Revenue A/c - Cr
Regards
JP -
UMB : Change in stock account hitting at the time of MIRO
Dear Experts ,
I have a material with a moving average price.
The material was taken in stock in initial entry. in period 10.
Then the material was consumed in period 11.
Further the material was procured . The posting period in GR was 11 & the period at the time of entry was 12.
Now the MIRO was done for the material . At the time of MIRO the material price was revised .
The MIRO entry date was in period 12 & the posting date was in period 11.
The entries for GR are :
1000 1 89 20501000 INV. OF RM 209,272.50 INR
1000 2 96 10601050 GR/IR CLEARING OTH. 209,272.50- INR
Cenvat Postings are :
1000 1 40 21221004 EXCISE RG 23A HCESS 89.00 INR 00
1000 2 40 21221000 EXC RG 23A BED BAS 8,795.00 INR 00
1000 3 40 21221003 EXCISE RG 23A ECESS 178.00 INR 00
1000 4 50 10601230 CENVAT CLEARING 9,062.00- INR 00
The MIRO Entries are :
1000 1 31 200173 XYZ VENDOR 241,402.00- INR **
1000 2 86 10601050 GR/IR CLEARING OTH. 209,272.50 INR 25
1000 3 89 20501000 INV. OF RM 11,572.50 INR 25
1000 4 40 10601230 CENVAT CLEARING 9,062.00 INR 00
1000 5 40 21211000 INPUT ST BASIC 1001 362.20 INR
1000 6 40 21211001 INP ST EDUC.CESS1001 90.55 INR
1000 7 40 21201000 INPUT VAT 8,833.80 INR 25
1000 8 40 21201001 ADDITONAL VAT 2,208.45 INR 25
AND a separate accounting document is posted with the following entries :
1000 1 99 20501000 INV. OF RM 9,985.50- INR
1000 2 83 40101230 CHANGE REVALUATION 9,985.50 INR
Pls tell me why sould the material get revaluated ??? GL 40101230 is assigned to UMB.
Thanks in advance ..
AnisPlease tell me same issue i am getting.
System asking UMB key noit defined , we do not want to put in loss/gain from revaluation.
In one PO, we doing miro and at this time all matreial consumed in material master, there is no quantity and value.
In other PO, we doing miro for 32 quantity and at this time , 22 quantity present in material master and we getting this error .
But i do not understand , same scenario i checked in quality , it working.
please guide me
Thanks,
Dharmveer
Maybe you are looking for
-
File System Repository problem
Hello guys, I'm on: J2EE Engine 6.40 PatchLevel 98256.313 Portal 6.0.14.0.0 KnowledgeManagementCollaboration 6.0.14.4.0 (NW04 SPS14 Patch 4) running on a Windows machine. I'm trying to set up a File System Repository to connect to a remote share on a
-
Self Service Portal UTC Timestamp
Hi All, Service Manager 2012 R2 UR3 Self Service Portal Question. I've seen several mentions of this on the forums, but either for the 2010 portal or listed as a bug that no longer exists on Connect. A user selects a date on the portal using local ti
-
Hi Friends, How to create the bitmap index? Pls given the syntax When should we create the Btree index? Given one example btree index regs renga
-
App Server 8.1 cluster not all members starting up.
Hi, Solaris 10. Two instances of app servers, each in a separate zone, on same machine. App servers were just configured with the configure-ha-cluster command to operate in HA mode. When restarting the cluster with two members, only one of them comes
-
I am trying to download a free game from the app store. I have never purchased online, I don't want to enter credit card info, can't I download FREE Solitaire w/o entering credit info??