MIRO showing wrong accounting entries

Dear Forum,
While doing MIRO for PO(Account assigned),one unwanted amount is flowing into accounting doc..PO contains ST,Ecess,HEcess conditiion types and MIGO contains GL Acc to GR/IR clearing acc..Now while simulating MIRO,its accounting doc is showing Vendor to GR/IR acc,ST,Ecess,HEcess and some amount related to GL acc given in SES...
Kindly provide me the details from which areas the amount can get flow to MIRO.
Waiting for your helpful replies...
Kindly revert in case issue not clear
Regards
Nainesh
SAP ECC 6.0

HI,
Check have you given any Fright condition types in Po and , check condition types in PO and also In MIGO also.
Other wise send clearly the PO conditions, MIGO acco Doc and Miro SimulTION ALSO.
rEGARDS,
Andra

Similar Messages

Wrong Accounting entries in Import Procurement

Hi SAP Experts,
I m facing 2 issues of wrong accounting entries in Import procurement.
1) Vendor field is not showing while making PO in item Condition details for Additional duty condition type.
2) Secondly the accounting entries may be coming wrong in GR, for ur Ref:
PO- details with Acc keys mentioned for Condition types
P001
Ex works Price
100
USD
1
NO
1,000.00
ZINS
Ins Charges Val/Qty
6
USD
1
NO
60
FR1
ZFRA
Sea/Air Frieght
6
USD
6
FR1
ZFRI
Freight Inland
1
USD
1
FR1
ZGRS
% Gross
12
USD
12
FR1
Assessable Value
107.9
USD
1
NO
1,079.00
JCDB
IN Basic customs
10
107.90
FR3
JCV1
IN CVD
3
35.61
FR3
ZECS
Education Cess
2
0.71
FR3
ZSEC
Secondary Edu. Cess
1
0.36
FR3
ZSAD
Additional Duties
1
12.24
FR3
Total
123.58
USD
1
NO
1,235.82
ZCLR
Clearing Charges
4
49.43
FR3
SKTO
Cash Discount
0
0
Total Landed Cost
128.53
USD
1
NO
1,285.25
& when i did MIGO below mentioned entries occurred.
1
89
22623000
O&M MAT-TRANSFORMERS
1,285.25
USD
2
96
22200000
GR/IR CLG A/C-DOM
1,081.74-
USD
3
50
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
60.00-
USD
4
96
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
107.90-
USD
5
96
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
35.61-
USD
Here only JCDB, JCV1 & ZINS amounts are going to freight clearing, rest is adding in GR/IR clearing account.
Why is it so?

Hi Dhinakaraj,
We have assigned Freight clearing accounts to tax accounts for testing purpose only, as FI guy was not here, n we are not getting any GL account for enteries check, we will change it later on with the exact tax accounts, but my question is that i have assigned accr keys to 10 condition types (4 FR1 & 6 FR3) ideally these conditions should hit frieght clearing account at the time of GR, but only few are hitting ( JCDB, JCV1 & ZINS ), why it is so ?
The GR/IR Account entry value should be 1000.00-
Correct me if i am wrong.

Wrong Accounting Entry for Rejection Excise Invoice through J1IS

Dear Experts,
When we are doing Rejection of Excise Invoice through J1IS, a wrong accounting entry is getting generated by system.
Where can I check the settings for Accounting Entry for Rejection Excise Invoice?
Thanks & Regards,
Reshma

Generally Excise Invoice for other invoice posting will be done through J1IV after creating Excise Invoice for other Movements in J1IS.
If Automatic Posting is activated against your excise group then you need not again to post J1IV. It happens along with J1IS.
By the by how you are returning Excisable goods through Return delivery with Original invoice 122 or through Return Purchase order 161 Movement type.
Have you entered Excise Rates BED, ECS and SECS in J1IS?
Elaborate in detail.

Wrong accounting entry for FRB2 (Freight Value)

Dear All,
Wrong accounting entry is happening for Freight value for a standard PO.
Rs. 300 was maintained in PO for this condition type, GR is done for full qty. but Accounting entry is Material cccount Rs. 156.24 to Freight clearing account.
Please help me on this issue
Regards
Prashant Atri

PO was created with 3 line items with each line item having freight condition type FRB2 - Freight value
For first line item it is Rs.200 for 1,008 quantity
For Second line item it is Rs.300 for 7,200 quantity
For Third line item it is Rs.300 for 2,604 quantity
GR was done for 3rd line item for the entire PO quantity 2604, but the frieght value is flowing only Rs. 156.24
1) Material is valuated at Standard Price.
It is Valuated at MAP
2)Condition type- FRB2- Rs 300 is entered at the Header Level and it is marked as a Group condition because of which it got apportioned to all the line items in the Purchase Order.
It is entered line itemwise with Rs.300 to the third particular line item and there is wrong flow of freight value for other line items too in GR.
Is Freight Condition type is a header condition and also check is it a group condition ( in t.code: M/06)
It is a header condition but not group condition and the values for frieght were given line item wise.
Need help to resolve this.
Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:14 PM
Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:15 PM

Cancel the Credit memo genarating wrong accounting entry

Hello,
We are facing when we Cancel sales credit memo credit memo genarating wrong accounting document entry in production system.
Same scenorio i have replicated in quality system and working fine.
I have checked the billing type for credit memo s1 and cancel credit memo in quality system and production system configuration is same why it' hitting wrongly.
Cancel credit memo is hitting document type RV instead of AB in production system but same it's correctly in quality system.
I have checked the oba7,vofa.
Please provide the clarification.
Regards,
Satya

Hello,
For document type RV we have maintained reverse document type AB.
For document type AB we have maintained reverse document type AB.
S1 is billing document type we can not map in OBA7 with documen type RV.
Please give me your inputs.
regards,
Satya

Exchange Rate Variance line showing wrong Account

Hi,
Our company is using Oracle EBS R12.1.3. When our Finance users do foreign currency transactions in Payables and match an invoice to the PO then, on the invoice distribution lines, there are two lines (one with the Line type "ITEM" and the other one is
"Exchange Rate Variance"). The ITEM line is Ok but the Exhange Rate Variance Line is showing the same Expense Account as on ITEM line (i.e., hitting wrong account). We have checked the setups in Payable Options. The Account that is defined as PO Rate Variance Gain / Loss is different from the account that is being hit on the Invoice Distribution lines. Why is that so?
Our Finance users are not satisfied with this. They're saying that Exchange Rate variance is not charging to the right account.
Please let me know which setup option am I missing.
Thanks and Regards

Hi Nehmat,
this is an intended behaviour ...
Your purchase order is in Foreign Currency ..
Your Invoice matched to Purchase order is in Foreign Currency ...
Difference between the PO and INV exchange rate has caused Exchange rate variance ..
The entered currency in the above case is Foreign currency therefore entered value for ERV line will be zero ... whereas the accounted line would have the computation for ERV done in functional currency....hence ERV line is acceptable for this case.
Regards,
Ivruksha

Post Goods issue showing wrong accounting figures

Dear Friends,
I have received a query where there is one sales order with many line item. Delivery is broken up into pieces and so is billing. When I go to the deliver -post goods issue and check for the accounting document for the first delivery, it shows for accounting document figures perfectly fine but when I go to the second delivery - post goods issue, the accounting document generated figures are vague. The figures which should be in lacs are reflected in crores in the accounting document in the Post goods issue.
The Price Control in the Material is Moving Average Price
The pricing procedure does not show anything wrong in the Sales Document.
Kindly suggest me a solution to this problem. This is a very critical issue as the figures are in huge numbers.
Regards
Vineet Jain

Dear Vineet
Really this is a strange problem which should not happen. Please confirm whether you are facing this issue in all subsequent deliveries or only for that particular sale order. If it is only for that particular sale order, then I feel, you need to refer to SAP.
Meanwhile, you can cross check the value as follows:-
Go to MB51, give the material code which has got issue, input plant and movement type and execute. A list will be displayed where press +"Cntrl + Shift + F12"+ so that the system will take you to a screen where for that particular material code and movement type, a detailed analysis will flow with delivery reference. In the same screen, there is a field "Amount in LC". Divide this value with despatched quantity and see whether the value here is flowing correctly (ie.it is picking the moving average price) by comparing with material master Accounting1 view.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Wrong accounting entries @ time custom miro

HI expert
I am performing, custom miro for Asset import, when at the time of sumulating i am getting A/C
Custom a/c
To captital consumption
my captital consumption is g/l wich i have use in PO in account assignment tab.
The correct entries hve to
Custom a/c
To CVD clearing a/c
Customs clearing a/c
Regard
Nabil

Hi,
It seems that system is directly trying to book the cost to consumption acct the time of Invoice.
This scenario may happen if there is no goods receipt expected for the Purchase Order.
Can you please check the " GR non valuated " and "Goods receipt" indicators in the purchase Orders.
Rajesh

WRONG ACCOUNTING ENTRY

PLEASE CHECK ACCOUNTUNG DOC . THIS WAS REVERSED VIDE DOCUMENT NO ENTIRE REVERSAL ENTRY IS DIFFERENT THAN ORIGINAL ENTRY. REVERSAL DONE WITH MR8M.WHY PURCHASE OFFSET AND PRD ACCOUNT IS HIITING WHEN I M DOING MR8M

HI,
Please check your MIRO accounting document using transaction FB03 or using MIR4 transaction.
If you have activated Purchase account management, same will be hit when you do GR, Invoice verification as well as reversal.
Thanks & Regards,

Mail showing wrong account descriptions

This isn't a major breaking feature, it's just me nit picking. In mail it's not updating the account description for my iCloud email but for all my other accounts it allows me to change them. What's weird is that it works just fine on my iPad 2 and it use to work on my iPhone 4. On my iPhone 4 my iCloud email is designated as "Me" which is what I use to have it back when MobileMe was around. I changed it to "iCloud" and it's still showing "Me". My iPad 2 show's this field as "iCloud" and I'm able to change it to whatever I want.
I've tried some fixes like renaming several times, turning iCloud email on and off, but nothing major. Like I said this is just a nit picking issue since I'd like everything to be unified. It in no way affects my usage of Mail or any other functionality and my iPhone is updated to the latest iOS update.

Hi all,
I finally solved my problem and felt like I should share my experience. The idea of changing the sorting/listing settings of Mail.app was indeed a good option. Unfortunately, it doesn't solve the issue on my iPhone or any other device/application accessing my data. Besides that, I didn't feel comfortable with this solution, since it didn't really fix my problem.
So here is what I did. I downloaded Mozilla's Thunderbird and set up my MobileMe account. After successfully retrieving all IMAP data I saved a copy of my complete IMAP folder structure locally. Afterwards I checked if I really had all messages and folders and deleted my data on MobileMe. Next step was uploading all my local messages/folders back to MobileMe again. I had about 3,5GB to transfer and it took me almost a night to finish this process.
After successfully transferring the data, I opened Mail.app and my all other devices/applications accessing that particular MobileMe account and had everything re-synchronized and Voilà Thunderbird transferred the messages with the received date correctly and Mail.app and other devices/applications displayed and sorted it accordingly. I deleted Thunderbird's email client and its associated files and folders, but I guess that application should be a keeper anyway.
So far I had the impression that this was all caused, because I transferred my local saved messages/folders to MobileMe through Microsoft Entourage. That application transmitted the date I transferred the message instead of using the message's header date settings.
I hope this helped.
Cheers!

Wrong Part2 Entry for GRPO IP transaction

Hi,
I want to avail the 100% ADC which is passed by the dealer, it is import purchase from domestic dealer,
So I Captured and Posted Excise Invoice in MIGO, with selecting IP sub transaction,
But the part2 entries shows wrong Accounting entry , The accounting document generated for last line item only, I have two line item in MIGO, there is no accounting entry for first line item,
I also checked the J_1IPART2 and J_1IEXCHDR table , but values were different for BED,
I reproduced the same scenario in testing, and found that when you have only one item in MIGO the entries were correct, but if there were more than one item in MIGO that time the accounting entry generated for only last line item
Need your help on this issue,

Dear KJ,
Can you check PO for both line items JEXC and JADC has value.
Refer the note.
964190
- ADC on domestic purchase of imported goods
Check whether you are following correct process from this note.
Regards
Binoy

Accounting Entries for Materials Return from Production Order

Dear Gurus,
I have a scenario here that a raw material, valuated at moving average = 151 and qty = 100, was issued to a production order last month. Due to some issue the order was not completed for a while and 93 qty was consumed for the order and because the remaining 7 were excess they were returned to the storage location. By that time the MOV had changed from 151 to 185 and the 7 qty was returned not at 151 (which would be correct) but at 185. This is a wrong accounting entry as it is showing an under consumption for the order.
Anyone have an idea why the system is doing this because the material should be returned on the price it was issued at so that the accounting entries are knocked off (The accounting entries for return deliveries to vendors are of the same price that they are recieved no matter how ever long a period they are returned). How do we stop the system from doing so and if it cannot be done what is the solution to the scenario.
Regards,

The normal entires are as follows (depending on your configuration);
1) Goods issue;
Credit inventory and debit COGS;
2) Billing document;
Debit customer account credit sales accounts;
3) Payment;
Credit customer account and debit cash/ checking account
pls assign points if helpful as a way to say thanks.

Transaction code J1IH other adjustment accounting entries

Hi,
While doing excise JV tranaction code J1IH other adjustment the system showing below accounting entries if tick the determine gl account
Excise duty paid A/c
To SEC payable on excise duty
To Excise duty payable-ExGrp
To ECS payable on excise duty
the above entry at time of saving its posting the below accounting entries
Excise duty paid
To PLA-SEC-
To PLA-BED
To PLA-ECs.
Can any body suggest me for the above acocunting entries.
Thanks
Ram

Hi Prashant
You need to check the excise balance for your company code Excise Group. Chances might be there for another company code and excise group cennvate balance are there for company code for which you are carrying J1iH is 0.
Regards
Vivek Sharma
-- Reward if helpful !!

Auto clearing of Accounting entries posted via MIRO & MR8M

Hi Gurus,
Currently we are doing the development relating to u201CDuplicate Invoice checku201D.
In one of the scenario system is referring the Accounting document of the cancelled MIRO.
Subject accounting document is there in the open items (FBL1N) and the corresponding reversal accounting document (Generated via MR8M) is also reflecting in the Open items (FBL1N).
MIRO documents get cancelled via T-code u2013 MR8M & the Material documents shows the cancelled / relevant document reference against each other.
Since both of our accounting document (generated via MIRO & MR8M) are appearing in Open items system is referring that in our Duplicate Invoice check development which we want to avoid.
If I am not wrong, in case of SD Billing document if we reversed, system automatically cancelled the relevant accounting document against each other.
Does anybody have an idea as how to clear these 2 accounting documents (MIRO & MR8M) against each other ?
Regards,
Shridhar

Hi Prasad,
Thanks for the option but we had aready given a though about clearing the Vendor line items.
In stead of F-44, we can set the F.13, background scheduling with daily execution and can clear the documents. Background execution in the night will occupy our space hence need instant result if possible. As well as background execution will happend in the timing after office hours so could be the case that before doing auto clearing someone may get the concern cancelled accounting document pertaining to the cancelled MIRO (Vendor Invoice - Line item) in the open items.
While doing the MR8M (Logistic Inv Reversal) alongwith Material Document reversal can we clear the accounting documents instantly on its own against each other ?
Regards,
Shridhar

MIRO Retention Accounting Entries

Hi Gurus ,
We have a Scenario where we mentioned a Retention Amount at Header . System automatically distribute the Percentage Amount at Item levels.When we post a MIRO related to that PO , system post an accouting entries to vendor reconcillation account .(Spl indicator H).If there are two item in invoice then system deduct retention on both items and show two separate Accounting entries related to each item.
Our requirement is that system should post a single entry related to total Invoice amount rather than generating separate entry for each line item in MIRO.
Reason for this is that we have around 100 line items in an invoice & at the time of retention payment it would become tedious to select 100 line items for payments. alternatively if only single entry gets generated in place of 100 line items then it would become easy to manage.
Pls guide how to tackle such scenario.
Thanks in advance !!
Honey

It appears you are using Installment payment term ( Created at OBB9) and system posts line items equal to number of instalments. Payment terms are assigned to Vendor Master so check which payment term is used.. Go to OBB8 and check any instalment paymenter term check box is selected. is selected go to OBB9 and check how many instalments?
Instead of intalment payment term, use normal payment term ( Created at OBB8) then system will post only one line item.

MIRO showing wrong accounting entries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for