Wrong Condition Value

Hi Experts,
We are creating one sales order in VA01, when we are picking one condition type (ZC00) and giving quantity 1 and price 10000, it is giving wrong amount in Base price for this condition. It is showing total amount 10 only, the correct value should be 10000.
where is the problem ?
Study SAP

Hi
Check the condition record of ZC00. in VK12
Secondly check the control data of ZC00 condition type in V/06. check its Calculation type & condition category ,Condition Class
Finally check in pricing procedure wheather you have assigned any requirement , Alt calc type to that condition type or not
Regards
Srinath

Similar Messages

Referencing condition values when creating return order is wrong...

Hello Experts,
Lets say I have a billing document that has 3 line items namely material A, B and C.
Now, I created a return order for material A with 2 separate line items because of different
storage locations. Now, is there a user-exit that lets my 2nd line item copy the condition values of the
1st line item of the reference billing document? because they are of the same material(A).
Currently, we are having problems when creating a return order having multiple line items of the same material
because the succeeding line items copies the wrong condition values of the referenced billing doc.
For example:
Original billing document:
Material      Discount
A          100
B          200
C          300
Return Order:
Material     Discount
A          100
A          200
A          300
The succeeding line items of my return order must point to the first line item since they are of the
same material. Hope you can help me guys. Thank you and take care!

You may need to explore in the copy control definition, especially the pricing type defined. Check if any customized requirements exists for condition which checks w.r.t to the document number instead of reference document number item.

Condition Values different fro Billing and Excise Invoice in some cases

Hi All,
Excise Invoice for domestic sales is having different condition values.
I am scenerio like this when Billing doc manually VF01, excise Invoice in generated automatically and condition values
were corrrect.But when I create Billing Document using BAPI in program, Excise Invoice is not generating,then
we are running BDC for T-code J1IIN and creating Excise Invoice.Excise Invoice generated in second case (by BDC)
is having wrong condition values.
Can anyone explain why it is happing.Is there any user exist to copy Billing Doc condition values to Excise Invoice?
Thanks in Advance ,
Rayudu

Thanks for you response Lakshimipathy.
The above mentioned configurations were all ready done.Excise Invoice is getting generated when we create Billing Doc online.
Problem here is Excise invoice is not getting generated automatically when Billing Doc is created by our program,so we were running BDC code to created excise Invoice.
Condition values ( Duties :AED,Ecess,SHEcess) were getting calculated wrongly in excise Invoice which is created by running BDC code in program. But the Excise invoice which was created automatically while saving Billing doc manually is having correct condition values. But the billing document condition values remain the same & correct for both.
Regards,
Rayudu

Condition value of Tax gets wrongly added to Total value of Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Wrong condition base value

HI
Thre is a tax code with combination
ED-DE, AED-4%, VAT 12.5%-DE
ED IS DEDUCTABLE
Additional excise duty is 4%
& vat % is 12.5%
the problem is for eg:
the toatal after excise 26,346.52
Vat 12.5 % is calculated correctly but the system show wrong condition base value
Regrd
sam

check your tax procedure. The sequence for VAT calculation could be wrong.
Amit

IPC condition value userexit - wrong condition rate

Hi Pricing-gurus,
I have a java condition value userexit to calculate the value for the very first price condition.
The condition value is calculated correctly, however, the price per unit is wrong which is due to the condition rate that was not changed, also.
If I change condition rate also in this formula, the entire pricing is wrong because the IPC carries out the pricing run multiple times (SAP: for internal reasons) resulting in a rate and value that is too high, as the changes are adding up.
How can I change the condition rate just once? Or how how can I make sure that the formula is carried out only once during a pricing update?
Regards,
Michael

Hi Pricing-gurus,
I have a java condition value userexit to calculate the value for the very first price condition.
The condition value is calculated correctly, however, the price per unit is wrong which is due to the condition rate that was not changed, also.
If I change condition rate also in this formula, the entire pricing is wrong because the IPC carries out the pricing run multiple times (SAP: for internal reasons) resulting in a rate and value that is too high, as the changes are adding up.
How can I change the condition rate just once? Or how how can I make sure that the formula is carried out only once during a pricing update?
Regards,
Michael

Condition value on Output tax (MWST) is wrong calculated

Hi experts,
I am facing an error when we are creating sales orders using the function module BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2. For different sales order position with the same price I am obtaining different condition value.
For example,
Sales Document item = 20 for Material1
CnTy
Name
Amount
per
UOM
Condition Value
ZE01
Price list SB
1.333,33
100
PC
13,33
ZE02
Customer Price SB
1.600,00
100
PC
16,00
MWST
Output Tax
20,000%
2,67
ZE03
Rounding Off
0,00
0,00
Sales Document item = 110 for Material2
CnTy
Name
Amount
per
UOM
Condition Value
ZE01
Price list SB
1.333,33
100
PC
13,33
ZE02
Customer Price SB
1.600,00
100
PC
16,00
MWST
Output Tax
20,000%
2,63
ZE03
Rounding Off
0,00
0,00
I don't know which could be the reason why the output tax is differing in both items with the same price (2,67 vs 2,63). Could you please guide me to get a solution?
Lots of thanks,
Javier

Hi G. Lakshmipathi,
I was trying to find the differences explained but I can't identify the issue.
These are the screen shots of both item positions:
Item number 20:
Ítem number 110:
Hope it helps to find a solution.
Thanks again,
Javier

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

CO-PA: value field correction due to miscalculated SD condition value

HI,
we are using ECC 60 SP11. Due to incorrect condition value calculation in SD this condition value (only used in CO-PA) is posted on a CO-PA value field causing wrong CO-PA results.
As the SD document (invoice) will not be changed anymore a reversal/reposting in CO-PA (ke4s) does not solve the problem.
My idea of value correction (only in CO-PA, I do not care about KEAT in that case...) is to use RKECADL1 to logical delete the old documents and to create a LSMW for ke21n to repost the documents again with the right value for the affected value field.
The question is, the document reference of the old (wrong) CO-PA document shows the billing document and its logical deleted by RKECADL1. My new document does not have a document reference to this billing document as the document source is ke21n.
Any idea how to "change" the document reference in a way that document flow for the billing document shows the ke21n-created document (with the right condition value)?? If I don not change it, document flow will not show any CO-PA document for that case (the old one is logical deleted, the ke21n-doc. is not linked to it)
I want avoid manual changes in Ce1**** as its a dirty solution and I am not completely sure if/which other tables are affected.
Best regards, Christian

The only way to effect the document flow is to cancel and repost the document. if that is not possible then KE21N - Create Line Items will fix your issue in COPA but this will not appear in billing. You can enter data fields that coonect to billing doc etc.
pts appreciated.

Edit condition value of service entry sheet

hi,
is there any way to change the service conditions value at the time of invoice verification. there is no seggregation of condition value when enter invoice for services.

Hi,
System posted difference / values in GR/IR services account based on condtion maintained in system ,the effect will takes place after the SES gets final acceptance. So system capturing condition values in MIRO-Invoice varification based on Posted SES .
If value seems wrong then revoke ses ,make changes or adjust the value with the help of Subsequest Credit /Subsequent Debit/ with Credit memo.
Hope this will be helpful.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Change of Condition Value in PO after MIGO

Hi Gurus!
I want to change the condition value after migo. I have a scenario in which we have lots of purchase orders which are received.
Unfortunately user has mentioned a wrong value in the tax. We want to change the value of tax in the purchase order after cancelling the MIGO document. But the system is not allowing me to do the changes. I also deactivate the release as well through ME29N.
Regards
Imran

Hi,
For changing the tax value, you need to change the tax code to the one that has the correct tax % configured. You can use transaction FTXP to find out the tax rates assigned to tax codes. For changing tax code it it not necessary to cancel already posted GRs
Ramesh

Condition value from previous PO changes total value of new PO

Dear gentlemen,
We have a surcharge condition, calculation type = B (Fixed amount), category = Delivery costs. When viewing header condition details in PO, there appears an unknown "condition base value" with no "rate unit" associated with it. This value is carried over to the next PO created, changing its total value, thus affecting inventory value. What is wrong with this condition? How can I not let the system carry over "condition value" from previous POs?
Regards,
Carlos Piana
La Universal
Guayaquil, Ecuador, South America

My aim is the difference between 56062 on 10.07.2012 00:00:00 and 52013 on 13.04.2012 and so on.
The final table should look like this:
DateId
Severity
PageCount
DeviceId
ErrorId DIFF
13.04.2012 00:00:00
1
52013
163
1              52013
10.07.2012 00:00:00
1
56062
163
1               4049
13.11.2012 00:00:00
4
63907
163
1                 ...
28.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64492
163
1
12.09.2012 00:00:00
4
61524
163
1
29.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64573
163
1
Why I am doing this is that I want to calculate an Printerindex. This is the Amount of Errors related to the volume of pages, printed.
The Formula in DAX is Measure:=(COUNT(FactErrors[ErrorId]))/(SUM(FactErrors[PagesCount])/10000)
So I get this PivotTable:
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
SUM PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
90135296
1362
31,24906792
HP
125
30805190
241
5,529387202
Lexmark
369
53500358
856
27,39392853
Samsung
29
5829748
265
41,33069233
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
5400624
246
38,36735967
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
429124
19
4,482612183
You see, that if I can't SUM already summarized printed volume. Another way could be to aggregate the volume as MAX() but this is not working, either.
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
MAX PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
435853
1362
0,151106177
HP
125
435853
241
0,07823357
Lexmark
369
312478
856
0,159998929
Samsung
29
64117
265
0,454565103
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
64117
246
0,45550292
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
42386
19
0,442762465
I hope you see my problem ...

How to get xkomv-kwert (condition value) from a pricing condition ZZP1

Hi experts,
   I have a pricing condition zcust that I need to modify in the sales order.   The calculation of ZCUST is dependent on the condition value in another price condition ZZP1.   The price for ZZP1 is a fixed amount of $6 which is split among line items in the order.    In sapmv45A, when the code hits userexit_save_document_prepare, the value of xkomv-kwert (condition value) exist.   In other user-exits in sapm45A, I was unable to find xkomv-kwert. My question is: How can I find the value of xkomv-kwert as i don't know how ZZP1 is calculated ?? There is no routine attached to ZZP1.
    THE ZCUST has a routine 993 which is similar to 3.   Here in program saplv61A, i was trying to get xkomv-kwert for ZZP1 but unable to get any data.   Can anyone suggest where i can get the data (xkomv-kwert) for ZZP1 in saplv61a ?
I looked at userexit_xkomv_bewerten_end in saplv61a but it does not help.
XKomv-kbetr always has data.    If i have ZZP1 data, then i can modify ZCUST.
Many thanks.
Joyce

Hi Jelena,
In VOFM, it is Formula/Condition Base Value for routine 993.   In Pricing Procedure, it falls in column "Base Type" for 993.
Let's see if i can simplify this: In a sales order with 2 line items:
               prices                    Amt                      Condition Value (USD)
Line 10     ZS1   sell price     2.30                                 1150
                 ZPP1 charge        6.36                                 3.40 (note the distribution **)
                 ZL1                      3                                      3
                ZR1 %                  1.000%                            11.50
                ZR2                      0.01                                   5
                Suggested price = 2.35                             1172.90
                  ZCUST               2.34                                1170
                  total price            2.34                               1170
Note: The ZCUST price is wrong. It is missing the ZPP1 charge which is 3.40. Zcust should be 1170 + 3.40 = 1173.40
Line 20     ZS1   sell price     25                                 1000
                 ZPP1 charge        6.36                                 2.96 (note the distribution **)
                 ZL1                      3                                      3
                ZR1 %                  1.000%                            10
                ZR2                      0.01                                   0.6
                Suggested price = 25.41                              1016.56
                  ZCUST                   25.34                           1013.60 (should be 1013.60 + 2.96)
               Total price                25.34                            1013.60
You can see the ZCUST is calculated incorrectly. The routine calculate zcust as $1170 and $1013.60 for each item which did not include the distribution amount of ZPP1 ($3.40 and $2.96).
When i debug the routine, the xkomv-kwert is zero.   I am trying to get $3.40 and $2.96 so i can add to to zcust in the routine.
Am trying to determine in saplv61A at which include that i can see #3.40 and $2.96 for both line items in xkomv-kwert.
Then maybe i can modify the routine or saplv61A so it shows the correct zcust price after entering the 2 line items in the sales order create (VA01) ?     Can you pls suggest ?
If i make the changes in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE, then user cannot see the correct zcust until the order is saved. This would be too late to know the zcust price ahead of time.
Pls view in the Edit mode... i see my texts have been compressed.
Many thanks
Joyce
Edited by: Joyce Chan on Jul 9, 2009 10:24 PM
Edited by: Joyce Chan on Jul 9, 2009 10:25 PM

Max condition value - didn't reset when SO was rejected

Hi All,
I need some help.
Requirement:
Need to set a max discount value for certain material.
Config:
A condition type for discount ZD36 is created:
- Cond.Class : A (Discount or surcharge)
- Calc.Type : A (%)
- Plus/Minus: X (Negative)
- "Group Condition" flag marked
- Manual entries : D (Not possible to process manually)
- "Condition Update" flag marked
- Scale Basis : C (Quantity scale)
- Check value : A (Descending)
Setting:
VK11--> Additional sales data --> Max condition value --> 900- (Valid from today until 31.12.9999)
Testing:
1. Create SO with full discounts (Value : 900-)
2. Reject the first SO by:
- Order reason: Z02 (Cancel Order)
- Reason for rejection: 13 (Cancel Order)
Problem:
When I tried to create another SO, the condition type for discount ZD36 didn't show up.
I think this is a basic thing which should have worked.
Something wrong with my config?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Wira Handika.

Hi ta.adithya,
I already find 2 ways to reset the cummulative value:
1. Delete the first SO or
2. Delete the line item in the first SO.
Is there a way to reset the cumulative value simply by reject SO?
Because we want to keep track to all the changes, so we don't want to delete anything.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Wira Handika.
Edited by: Wira Handika on May 25, 2011 11:22 AM

Getting Reason Code, Condition Type, and Condition Value in one report

Hello there,
I have got a Question for you all BW Gurus. I need the answer for this as soon as possible. I will assign points to all helpful answers.
I am having a Sales cube, Delivery Cube, and a Conditions Cube which I built. Each cube is populated from different ODS. Means there are 3 ODS for 3 cubes. I am joining these 3 cubes under a Multiprovider.
My Question is:
We are using Reason Codes at Delivery level. We have identified an empty field in the delivery tables and populating this field with the reason codes. We have condition type and condition value only in the Condition cube. One of the reporting requirements is that we need to see Reason code, Condition Type, and Condition value in one report. I am planning to report on the Multiprovider. Since Reason code, Condition Type, and Condition value are not present in all the 3 cubes (means they are not common characteristics in the Multiprovider), I dont think I can get those values in one report if I report on the Multiprovider. Please correct me if I am wrong. If what I say is correct, please tell me how to solve my problem. Once again, helpful answers will be greatly appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thank you in advance.
Kind Regards,
Swathi

Hello Swathi,
Please do not post the same question on multiple forums.
Thanks,

Wrong Condition Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for