Wrong excise postings

Hi,
I created a PO with proper cond.records.
MIGO - done. values posted corectlty.
J1iex - Post : done : values & postings are correct.
MIRO - values are popingup are wrong.Tax is not calcutaing.
Base :1000
BED :100
ECS :2
Secs:1
If I flaged 'Calculate tax' only 100 is showing.
In OB40:
Vs1 - JMOP - given CENvat Clearing A/c,
but my doubt is whether  flag ' Taxcode' at rules or not that is one.
Pls guide me.
Regards
Raman

HI,
Tax code should be same po and miro. check tax code slection in MIRO
Regards
murugesan

Similar Messages

  • Issue related to the Excise Postings

    Issue related to the Excise Postings
    My Scenario is i have an Purchase Order with Excise Duty of 16.48%
    For Eg: Net Price(1000) + Excise Duty (16.48%) = Rs.1164.8
    my vendor gives me a Modvat of 10% i.e Rs.104.8
    but i have to pay him the total amount (i.e with excise)=Rs.1164.8
    How to do the GR with Excise & Invoice Verification??
    Wat amount will be Credited to vendor???
    How to do Excise Posting for this Scenario???
    Thanx & Regards,
    Kumar Rayudu
    Message was edited by:
            Kumar Rayudu

    Hiii Ramakrishna,,
    User doesnt know at the Time of Purchase Order that how much excise & Modvat will be getting. Only the Gross value is given in the Purchase order including all
    taxes ( No Tax Code in the Purchase Order).
    Excise Invoice and Vendor's Bill are received when the Materials are received.
    They will get the Modavat according to the Excise Invoice of the Manufacturer 
    Now while doing GR i manually give the Excise BED & Cess given in the Manufacturer Excise Invoice.
    Post the Excise Invoice before doing MIRO.
    The Problem is in the MIRO Transaction.
    At the MIRO i have selected the Tax Code with Excise.
    System is caluclating the the Excise on the PO Value i.e more than the value in the Vendor Excise Invoice (Part 1 & Part 2) and the Liablity of vendor is increased and the difference amount is posted to the material.
    Everything is going fine except the Vendor's liability and it should be value of the Purchase Order.
    How the system is caluclating the Value ???
    am i doing any wrong procedure???
    Explain me???
    Thanx & Regards.
    Kumar Rayudu

  • Wrong excise Base in Excise tab in Item details in MIGO for ImportPurchases

    Hi All,
    We are facing an issue with wrong excise base in transaction MIGO item datails in excise tab,
    Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
    Case:
    In  PO ,
                 Value in USD     Ex Rate          Value In INR
    Assesable value     101                            52.4659          5299.0559
    IN Basic customs     10.1          52.4659          529.90559
    Sub (*** Value + BCD     111.1          52.4659          5828.96149
    IN CVD          11.11                            52.4659          582.896149
    In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
    But in MIGO in excise tab excise Base is 5,776.50--> which is wrong.
    Please help in correcting the same in system.
    All relevant configuration and default conditions are maintained in systm.
    Regards,
    Vijaykumar P

    > Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
    > In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
    Hi, I think your system is showing correct,
    Base at the time MIGO will not be Assassable value +BCD, It will only be Assassable value,
    Your 1st point is right "Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty"
    Assassable value consist of Material cost, Insurance, Freight, 1% Landing charge etc. Check with your Imports team & Excise team for the same.
    Apart from that, if your concern is about values then just check the exchange rates & the Miro posting what you have did.

  • Capital purchase - EXCISE POSTINGS

    Hi,
    I ve created a PO for asset purchase. The PO value is 100000 (material cost) + 16000 ( BED) +  320(ECESS) . So total Po value is 116320. While doing GR. The stocl account and GR/IR clearing account are coreectly posted with  100000. But excise postings are
    Cenvat hold - 7840 Dr
    Cenvat CAP BED - 8000 Dr
    Cenvat CAP ECS - 160 Dr
    Cenvat clearing - 16000 Cr
    Is this posting correct. I think the  Cenvat clearing is not updating with ECESS.
    What could be the reason? its urgent. pls share your views
    regards
    B Shar
    Edited by: Scorpio n on Mar 24, 2008 11:52 AM
    Edited by: Scorpio n on Mar 24, 2008 1:46 PM

    All these charges should have been part of the PO Price you entered. This can be achieved provided your pricing procedure is enabled with the related condition types, if not then you have to create a PO for these and find a way link it with the original procurement.

  • Different SO UOM/productionUOM and wrong excise posting

    Hi
    We have an issue with make to order scenario where we receive order for knitted fabric in meters whereas production of knitted fabric is accounted for in KGs. As per the excise chapter id, excise records of knitted fabric is required to be maintained in KGs.
    However in SAP, all the excise postings are done based on the sales UOM and not the production UOM. Is there any way we can configure SAP to update excise records of some material by an alternate UOM instead of the sales UOM.
    Looking forward to your valuable inputs to resolve this issue.
    Regards
    Shaji Varghese

    Thanks Velu for your reply.
    We do maintain alternate unit of measure and we also have batch level conversion of quantity. However, as per SAP if the sale unit of measure is Meters, all the excise postings and excise invoice will be in meters and not KGS, which is the production quantity and standard quantity as per excise rules.
    Can you suggest any work around for this?
    Thanks in advance.
    Shaji

  • Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

    Hi:
    We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     0
    Cess     0
    SECess     0
    Value+Excise     1000
    VAT 5%     50
    ValueExciseVAT     1050
    (Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     100
    Cess     2
    SECess     1
    Value+Excise     1103
    VAT 5%     55.15
    ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
    We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
    24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
    We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
    The Material was issued to Cost Centre
    Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
    To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
    24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
    24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
    24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
    My Question:
    a. Is this the correct way?
    b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
    Please guide.
    Regards,

    Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
    Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
    The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
    We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
    Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
    Regards,
    PK

  • Wrong excise value is calculated in billing doc. = VF01.

    Dear All ,
    I have created a billing doc for a STO , now my price of 1 ton is Rs 57328.94 & in billing the Con for exc is JEXP it is for,14 % but the exc cal culating as Rs 8329.61 , instead of Rs 8026.05 here the wrong calculated Rs 8329.61 is 14.529 % of Rs 57328.94 .so i m in VF03 now selected the cond type & clicked on detail icon here what i see that the a screen opens for header cond. details , here in cond details tab the amount coming as 14 % , Cond base value is Zero & Cond value is Rs 57328.94 , After this on the same scren i had clikced on Go to -
    > cond record --> here also 14 % is given then how the system is calculating 14.529 % instead of 14 % .
    Rgds
    sap12

    in the STO under cond tab at item level i had clicked on analysis tab then the con appearing are as under --->
    Condition type     Message     Description
    P101     213     Amount copied from material valuation data
    FRB1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    FRC1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    FRA1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    Y017     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    Y018     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    Y019     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    Y020     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    Y015     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
    Total Cost     200     Subtotal
    Here there is no JEXP , now as u wrote thjat to check the excise rate in J1ID -
    > there is no excise rate made for this material , after this ---> in exceptional exc rate there are no entries., now pl guide that what to check .
    Rgds
    sap12

  • Wrong Excise values posted in MIGO

    Hi all,
    This is Depot scenario.
    User has posted wrong values in Excise tab in MIGO & posted GR. Excise values are updated in Table RG23D.
    The same material is already disptached to the customer end.
    Currently there is No stock of material in the system.
    Now User wants to reverse all this wrong duties.
    How to resolve this issue?
    Pls suggest solution
    Sameer

    Hi,
    Please reverse the material document in MIGO.
    Regards,
    Smitha

  • Wrong excise duty

    Hi,
    We had completed the utilization for previous month and on first day of next month we found that duties were captured wrong
    Now we have cancel the Excise duties which were captured wrong but when we are canceling it  is hitting PLA account rather than Modvat account but why system here not hitting on the modavat account.
    Regards

    u have to maintain the JEC1 as 2% in FV11, as per ur query u specified it is 14%.Check.
    regards,
    BSK

  • MIGO HEADER WRONG EXCISE VALUE

    Hi,
    While doing Migo with excise option, in the header excice tab, BED is calculating wrongly ..
    Basic - Rs 1000
    BED - 14% - Rs 1400  instead of Rs 140
    where in item column, the exicse values are flowed correcly.
    pls suggest, where is the mistake..

    I am also facing the same problem any answers

  • CIN--MIGO--Wrong excise value

    Hi Buddies,
    We created STO from Plant to Plant and taken SD side to the delivery and profoma and then excise invoice.
    In this case, we created one STO- with four deliveries(with partial quantity) -one proforma(combining all deliveries in one proforma invoice) and one excise invoice with refercencing the proforma in SD. While doing MIGO(goods receipt in MM), if we give delivery number and excise invoice number, automatically it is picking the last line item of excise invoice. All BED,ECESS,SCESS is calculating wrongly in MIGO.
    We noted that, system is always picking that last delivery excise value for each and every delivery in MIGO.
    Regards,
    G.Rajesh.

    hi
    we also faced similar problem and we done the corrections in the userexit
    Can you please go through the SAP note mentioned below and apply.
    1042035
    1035545
    1003634
    If you mark the Condition category as 'H' for the Price condition
    which has the assesable value then the Excise base value will flow but the price condition should be non statistical, if it is statistical in
    your pricing procedure then you will have use the user exit
    J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE which has the KONV structure , you will
    have to pass the value to the parameter EXCITM_BASE
    hope it will help you in resolve the issue.
    with regards
    baalakrushnan.da

  • Wrong excise calculations in MIRO

    Dear All,
        we have created a PO and partial MIGO and MIRO has been done and all the entries has been posted correctly. Now while doing MIRO for the remaining partial quantity excise values are calculating wrong in MIRO. GRN has been done and part 1 and part 2 entries also posted. the tax code has 12% , 2% , 1 % and VAT 5.5% . In part 1 and 2 12% amount 2734.00 has been posted.  while doing MIRO ED value is calcuating as 1367.00.
    i have checked in FTXP and in J1ID the values has not been changed. Kindly suggest how to proceed.
    thanks and regards,
    RGS

    thank you so much..!!  i check the table J_1IGRXREF as the per link suggested and found only half of the amount is updated there. i.e., 1367.00
    Again i checked the table with the excise invoice number and found two entries of 1367.00 with two material document both those two material document has the same accounting document.
    i..e,
    material document 1          1367.00           accounting document 1
    material documnt  2           1367.00           accounting document 1
    however only one material document i can able to display in MIGO with 2734.00 when i display the other document it says document does not exist.
    can i suggest to reverse the GRN and then to do it again ?

  • In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

    Hi,
    We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
    please suggest me the any config
    Thanks
    Shital

    Hi,
    i have test in SAP note u suggested
    Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
    but my scenario is different
    Thanks
    Shital

  • Wrong Excise Duty amount in MIRO

    Hi Gurus,
    I have done MIGO , in which I have captured Excise Duties as BED - 35000.00, 2%ECS- 700.00, 1%S&H Cess - 350.00, but in MIRO it is showing as BED - 35000.00, 2%ECS- 35000.00, 1%S&H Cess - 350.00.
    My client is using TAXINJ, we have recently added two condition types as JEC1 for 2% & JAX2 for 1% and assigned to tax Code. In PO , I have maintained the tax rate in J1ID as 1421. In PO Invoice tab Condition Value is shown correctly against as BED (JMO1)- 100%, - 35000.00 , (JEC1) ECS-14% - 700.00 & (JAX2)S&H Cess-1%- 350.00 but in Amount column it shows as BED (JMO1)- 100%, (JEC1) ECS-14% & (JAX2) S&H Cess-1%.
    System is taking value as 35000.00 for 2%ECS instead of 700.00
    Pl. guide
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Vikas

    u have to maintain the JEC1 as 2% in FV11, as per ur query u specified it is 14%.Check.
    regards,
    BSK

  • Wrong excise duty during miro

    sap gurus,
    our scenario is we capture excise invoice then migo(GR) then post excise invoice and then after that miro.
    In many cases we need to change excise duty in j1iex and then we post excise through j1iex. The changes that we do in excise duty should be reflected in miro coz in our case we do miro after j1iex(post). In few cases system is not reflecting correct excise invoice in miro. during miro system is picking excise as is in PO and not the one changed in ji1ex.
    And yes we always do miro after excise post(j1iex). Plz tell me the solution.

    In Miro,tax amounts will be calculated according to tax code so if you do changes in J1IEX then it wont' be reflected in invoice.
    For dealer vendor you need to tick MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab of excise invoice(J1IEX),enter excise base value,
    excise duties for capturing,refer it in migo & later post excise invoice.
    In MIRO change base amount without excise duties,select ed tax code,now you can see orginal excise duties captured in j1iex will be reflected in MIRO.
    Refer note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer

Maybe you are looking for