WRT 110 Communication issue

I've had my WRT110 for about 3 years or so, and it has worked fine for a long time.  Today my computers were connecting to the router, but weren't getting internet access so I did the following:
checked lights on router and modem, they all indicated everything was working and normal
Reset Modem,
Reset Router,
Still nothing.
Called Comcast, they said everything was working fine from their end.
Plugged my laptop into the ethernet connection on router.
Nothing
Plugged laptop directly into modem and it works fine.
I saw the link on here to setup the router, and I have 0s on the internet ip, like it suggests at the end.  When I click on the "release" and "renew" buttons nothing changes. 
Still can't get anything to work.  I am reluctant to reset it because when I first bought it I had a hell of a time getting it to work right, and don't remember what all settings I had to mess with.
Cheers
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I think you will have to do the reset this time to check if the router can still be revived. Or before you do the reset, since you can get online directly connected to the modem, download the firmware of the router first (link to download is: http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/support/routers/WRT110). When you connect the laptop directly to the router, access it's page and upgrade the firmware. The instructions are on this link. After the upgrade, proceed with resetting the router - push and hold the reset button on the router for 30seconds using a pin or paperclip. Power it down for 10-15seconds. Once the power light goes solid, follow the instuctions provided on the link you found out to setup the router.

Similar Messages

  • WRT 110 - Connection issues

    I was highly reluctant to purchase a Linksys product as I've had D-Link in the passed and they are 100% plug and play. Sadly my 210lb great dane was having fun and decided it would be a good idea to smash into my router a few times causing it an early death. To start with, in the last week my Desktop has lost sync (via a hardwired connection) with the router and been unable to reconnect on it's own until I go through disabling, re-enabling, disabling, re-enabling, etc etc etc. the LAN connection until the router decides my computer is worthy. In addition, my Xbox 360 now also picks up the Linksys, but will not connect to the internet through it, let alone use a local network and try to sync to my computer. The one time I DID have the 360 connected to it, it wouldn't synchronize to my PC through the network. I've never had this problem in the passed setting up networks with D-Link equipment and am quite beyond dis-satisfied at this point. And at the rate things are going, I'll continue to be that way until some miraculous event causes this router to work as it should. Any tips would be greatly appreciated.
    (Mod note: Edited for guideline compliance.) 
    Message Edited by kent07 on 03-20-2009 08:20 PM

    As if you are not able to go online through router, I think you need to re-configure the settings on your router again. To configure the settings on your router Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your router...
    Here are some settings which can you follow and configure the settings on your router..
    Click Here to configure your router with Cable ISP. 
    Click Here to configure your router with DSL ISP. 
    This are the wireless settings which you can do it on your router.
    Open an Internet Explorer browser page on your wired computer(desktop).In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1
    Leave username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
    For Wireless Settings, please do the following : -
    Click on the Wireless tab
    -Here select manual configuration...Wireless Network mode should be mixed...
    -Provide a unique name in the Wireless Network Name (SSID) box in order to differentiate your network from your neighbours network...
    - Set the Radio Band to Standard-20MHz and change the Standard channel to 11-2.462GHz...Wireless SSID broadcast should be Enabled and then click on Save Settings...Please make a note of Wireless Network Name (SSID) as this is the Network Identifier...
    For Wireless Security : -
    Click on the Sub tab under Wireless > Wireless Security...
    Change the Wireless security mode to WEP, Encryption should be 64 bits.Leave the passphrase blank, don't type in anything...Under WEP Key 1 type in any 10 numbers please(numbers only and no letters eg: your 10 digit phone number) and click on save settings...Please make a note of WEP Key 1 as this is the Security Key for the Wireless Network...
    Click on Advanced Wireless Settings
    Change the Beacon Interval to 75 >>Change the Fragmentation Threshold to 2304, Change the RTS Threshold to 2304 >>Click on "Save Settings"...
    Now see if you can locate your Wireless Network and attempt to connect...

  • Any fix for the PC based network printer communication issue with Mavericks?

    Any fix for the PC based network printer communication issue with Mavericks?

    I just signed up for FIOS and am not experiencing your problem (had enough other ones instead).
    Go to mail preferences ~ click on a mail account ~ click on the advanced tab. The only settings that worked for me were: port 110 SSL OFF, authentication: Authenticated POP (APOP). If I remember correctly when I first set this up another window opened and I typed in my password and never had to do that again.
    Hope this helps.

  • Help with WRT 110

    Ok guys first off I'm not the greatest with computers. Here's my deal, I have a WRT 110 and I have Charter high speed internet. I have my desktop hardwired to the router and I have a printer and 2 laptops that are wireless. The printer at the moment is a non-issue because I can't find my installation cd to change the wireless settings but that's another mess. My issue is when I have my desktop and my work laptop connected to the router and I try to add my personal laptop it knocks the internet out. The desktop and work laptop both automatically lose the signal. Any help would be greatly appreciated. 
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    On all Windows 7 and Vista computers, disable IPv6 under LAN properties for both the wired and wireless adapters.  Reboot computers and try to connect again.

  • WRT 110 as an access point

    I have two WRT 110 and I am using one as a wireless router and I wish to use one as a wireless access point, but cannot get them to connect. I have tried it manually and using the wireless protected setup. Is there anything that needs to be cofigured in the router to use it as an access point only? Any help or advice would be appreciated.

    You can not connect them wirelessly, you must connect via Ethernet cable.
    You may go here to find out how to cascade two routers.

  • FIX: FireWire communication issue solved - What worked for me

    After installing the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, I found that my FireWire devices (not just my iPod) no longer worked. After much messing about with all the suggestions I found online (none of which worked) I've managed to sort out the FireWire communication issues I had.
    you can read about the exact issues I had here:
    http://forums.kustompcs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=35034
    and here:
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=1562072
    Unfortunately those looking for a quick fix will be disappointed, I had to:
    a) Send my iPod Mini back to Apple, which was promptly replaced
    b) Totally re-install Windows (including drive format)
    c) Borrow the install CD that came with my friends iPod, which had a later version of iPod Updater (2005-10-12) than the one I had on my install CD, but earlier than the dreaded 2006-01-10
    If anyone needs this updater (as it's impossible to find an earlier one on Apple's website) drop me your email in here and I'll send you the web address to download it. This is basically a ZIP of the original CD, totally virus free (for those that are worried) and appears to work fine.
    If Apple have an issue with this, then why don't you fix the link on your site to this updater; this is simply my response to the complete lack of response from Apple on this matter.
    A quick note about the: 'connection rate=S100 ERROR'.
    If you discover you have this error when you test your iPod in diagnostic mode; find out how to do this here:
    http://www.methodshop.com/mp3/ipodsupport/diagnosticmode/index.shtml
    Then it appears there is nothing you can do to fix this other than sending it back to Apple. No amount of restoring will solve it.
    I hope this helps someone out there! I've yet to fix the issue with my LaCie drive (basically it needs sending back) which if anything proves that whatever screwed my system did something to the hardware on a low level, it wasn't a Windows software issue, because after re-installing it, I download SP2 and ALL the latest hotfixes, if that was the cause, it would have done it again.
    This leaves one culprit - the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, as this was the only software I installed at the time both of my FireWire devices went down, avoid it like the plaque.
    Regards
    Matt

    After installing the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, I found that my FireWire devices (not just my iPod) no longer worked. After much messing about with all the suggestions I found online (none of which worked) I've managed to sort out the FireWire communication issues I had.
    you can read about the exact issues I had here:
    http://forums.kustompcs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=35034
    and here:
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=1562072
    Unfortunately those looking for a quick fix will be disappointed, I had to:
    a) Send my iPod Mini back to Apple, which was promptly replaced
    b) Totally re-install Windows (including drive format)
    c) Borrow the install CD that came with my friends iPod, which had a later version of iPod Updater (2005-10-12) than the one I had on my install CD, but earlier than the dreaded 2006-01-10
    If anyone needs this updater (as it's impossible to find an earlier one on Apple's website) drop me your email in here and I'll send you the web address to download it. This is basically a ZIP of the original CD, totally virus free (for those that are worried) and appears to work fine.
    If Apple have an issue with this, then why don't you fix the link on your site to this updater; this is simply my response to the complete lack of response from Apple on this matter.
    A quick note about the: 'connection rate=S100 ERROR'.
    If you discover you have this error when you test your iPod in diagnostic mode; find out how to do this here:
    http://www.methodshop.com/mp3/ipodsupport/diagnosticmode/index.shtml
    Then it appears there is nothing you can do to fix this other than sending it back to Apple. No amount of restoring will solve it.
    I hope this helps someone out there! I've yet to fix the issue with my LaCie drive (basically it needs sending back) which if anything proves that whatever screwed my system did something to the hardware on a low level, it wasn't a Windows software issue, because after re-installing it, I download SP2 and ALL the latest hotfixes, if that was the cause, it would have done it again.
    This leaves one culprit - the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, as this was the only software I installed at the time both of my FireWire devices went down, avoid it like the plaque.
    Regards
    Matt

  • Nexus1000v - ? communication issue vcenter - N1Kv ???

    Unregulary we get these kind of alarms in our vcenter although there were no changes made on nexus or VM side.:                 
    "vSphere HA detected that host HOSTNAME is in a different network partition than the master MASTERNAME"
    They are cleared after a certain time without any manual action.VMware assumes a communication issue between vcenter and nexus1000.
    Anyone with similar experiences (or even a solution)???

    Hi Sachin,
    Thanks for your response.
    Please find my reply below:
    Is the module showing as up in the VSM when you execute 'show module'?
    >Yes the module is up and showing active when i execute the given command
    Is you ESX management VLAN allowed on the access port profile and on the uplink? Is it created on the switch?
    >Yes it is created on the vswitch as well as the upstream switches and allowed in the link also.
    Do you have system VLANs for your control, packet connectivity? For your ESX mgmt connectivity?
    > Yes i had defined control, packet and management vlans as system vlans.
    I feel that the port profile is not allowing the traffic to go in and out from the DVS.
    When i change the uplink of VSM from vswitch to DVS then the VSM doesnt reach gateway itself.
    Thanks,

  • WRT 110 - New Router not detected

    I am having problems with the setup wizard.  Im getting "New router not detected".  It's all setup correctly.  I've reset modem, router and rebooted 100 times atleast.  I can get on the internet when the modem is conected through the router.  Also, I cant get to the 192.168.1.1 router setup.  I have set up other linksys routers without problems.  We are on Time Warner cable internet.  Please help before I smash this thing.

    I have an older Linksys (twin antenas) product so bought this for my son in Ohio.  He tried to connect the router using his laptop and could not do it...after calling support (Punjab in India) they could not resolve the problem or begin to figure it out.  After watching a 6 year old on YouTube hook up a router, I figured it couldn't be that hard so I told him to send the WRT 110 to me along with his laptop. 
    After trying the install myself (using the supplied CD), I could not connect to the internet via the wired laptop-router-modem either.  So I figured the wireless device of the laptop may be interfering with the router.  So I went to Control Panel>>Network Connections>> and right clicked on "Wireless Connection" and clicked "DISABLE".  After that, the laptop DID connect to the internet via the ethernet cable. 
    When I tried to login to the new wireless network using another laptop, I could not connect after repeated attempts using the letter "O" and the number "0" of the WEP code generated by the CD install.  I finally COPIED and PASTED the WEP code to a Word document, saved to a stick, then transfered the doc to the wireless laptop.  After COPY and PASTE of the WEP code to the LOGIN >>>SUCCESS. 
    The wireless connection works fine two floors away from the router as does my old antenna router did, so the "range" problem reported by others is a mystery to me.  Don't know why the "support" couldn't have solved this problem....I'm not a real computer nerd, but can do "trial and error" fixes. 
    Bottom line: router works fine and is better looking than the "antenna" ones but who cares???  I go for the blinking lights anyway <g>

  • Ethernet Communications Issue

    Hello list,
    I have an ethernet communications issue.
    We can communicate with our products using two communications modes, ethernet, and a proprietary CAN. For the ethernet connection, I have a router that assigns a DHCP address to the product (169.254.130.005). For the CAN connection there is a hardware ethernet to CAN adapter that has an assigned address of 169.254.130.006.
    Below is a simplified example of the code I use to talk to the product. (there is only one loop...two loops are shown. One showing the True Cases, one showing the False cases.
    So I set the I.P. address, set "Connect?" to true, and run my code for a while. I then set "Connect?" to false, change the I.P. address, and then set "Connect?" to true.
    What I have found is that the "TCP Close Connection" does not actually close the connection, and the "TCP Read" and "TCP Write" are reading and writing to BOTH I.P. addresses simultaneously! (confirmed by using Wireshark). I don't understand how this can be since I only have one TCP Write and one TCP Write, and see only one "Connection I.D." when I probe that wire.
    Am I not closing the connection properly? Do I have to kill the connection ID in Windows somehow?
    Any ideas would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mike
    Using Labview 8.2
    Windows XP
    Attachments:
    Ethernet Issue.JPG ‏274 KB

    Nathand,
    The code shown is a simple representation of what I'm doing.  I guess it wasn't clear.  The switch is connected to a shift register to compare the previous & current loops itterations and only opens one connection "on change" of the "Connected?" input.  (that is confirmed with Wireshark).  Also, the product tells me that I have made only one TCP/IP connection on each IP address.
    I pass the Connecion ID that is created out the right side of the loop and into the left with a shift register when the connectionis made...so the same Connection ID is used for each read/write.  What I'm not understanding is how I can see only one Connection ID on the wire but a read/write to both I.P. addresses with only one one read and one write in my code.
    Any other ideas would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Mike

  • Xi3 companion box communication issues with X1 platform

    Hopefully someone has had this issue as I haven't been able to find this one during my search.   Subject: Xi3 set top boxes will not connect to the X1 platform on the same outlet(s) that my RNG150 will.   Background: 4 weeks ago a very polite gentleman working with an Xfinity subcontractor arrived at 8am to install our Xfinity package and equipment.  8 hours later he finally left.  During that time, there were multiple connectivity issues with the small Xi3 set top boxes.  The X1 platform (DVR) and modem were easily set up and tested and worked perfectly (and still do) at the main location in our great room, however, when it came time to connect the other 3 rooms (all located upstairs), there were communication issues.  As my wife set up services with Xfinity, she didn't realize we needed these extra set top boxes, so the technitian had to call and add them and only had (2) of the "new" Xi3 boxes, but had an "older" RNG150 set top box in his vehicle so we had him install that one as we didn't mind the older larger box in the rec room.  After multiple calls to trouble shoot why these two boxes weren't communicating, he apparently resolved the issue, tested the boxes and we signed off and he left.  That evening I went to turn on the bedroom tv and nothing but the red screen of death.  Error code RDK 03030.  So, I followed the troubleshooting guildlines, rebooting the platform in sequence, several times to make sure I got it right.  Still red screen.  I checked the other Xi3 box, same issue.  Since the rec room tv was still working, I just jacked that box and moved it to our bedroom.  BOOM.  Full functionality.  Only problem was the inability to access our saved programs.  So, i've been doing this for the last 4 months.  Moving the box from our room to the rec room for our little one to watch cartoons, then back to our room at night.  Suffice it to say, my wife is growing tired of this so I put a call into the technician as he wanted to make sure I call him first so the install doesn't look negative on his record.  No response.  I've been researching this for the last week and have come to the following conclusions. - Possible wire/coax issue.This seemed the most plausible, however, I was able to confirm we have the COMMSCOPE     Amp installed and the line to the X1 platform does in fact work based on the fact the older box works on the same line, so if it is some sort of wiring issue its lost at the Xi3 box or perhaps the older box requires a weaker signal to perform?  I've also seen many comments suggesting the COMMSCOPE amps are garbage.  Thats fine, but if it worked previously, and the older box works, would that still be the culprit?
    - Moca issue.I'm not entirely sure how this works, but when checking diagnostics, the grid shows 0's across the matrix.  Even with the older box active.  I'm at work currently so I cannot post the rest of the diagnostics, can provide that once I get home.- Hardware issue.  Even though these boxes worked when the technician installed and tested them, perhaps there is a hardware failure or these boxes are "bad".   Hopefully someone on here can help, I'd prefer not to have to contact customer service, follow all the trouble shooting steps I've perfomed ad nauseum and have a tech come out if possible.  However, if it has to happen then so be it. Thanks for your help in advance.

    Hopefully someone has had this issue as I haven't been able to find this one during my search.   Subject: Xi3 set top boxes will not connect to the X1 platform on the same outlet(s) that my RNG150 will.   Background: 4 weeks ago a very polite gentleman working with an Xfinity subcontractor arrived at 8am to install our Xfinity package and equipment.  8 hours later he finally left.  During that time, there were multiple connectivity issues with the small Xi3 set top boxes.  The X1 platform (DVR) and modem were easily set up and tested and worked perfectly (and still do) at the main location in our great room, however, when it came time to connect the other 3 rooms (all located upstairs), there were communication issues.  As my wife set up services with Xfinity, she didn't realize we needed these extra set top boxes, so the technitian had to call and add them and only had (2) of the "new" Xi3 boxes, but had an "older" RNG150 set top box in his vehicle so we had him install that one as we didn't mind the older larger box in the rec room.  After multiple calls to trouble shoot why these two boxes weren't communicating, he apparently resolved the issue, tested the boxes and we signed off and he left.  That evening I went to turn on the bedroom tv and nothing but the red screen of death.  Error code RDK 03030.  So, I followed the troubleshooting guildlines, rebooting the platform in sequence, several times to make sure I got it right.  Still red screen.  I checked the other Xi3 box, same issue.  Since the rec room tv was still working, I just jacked that box and moved it to our bedroom.  BOOM.  Full functionality.  Only problem was the inability to access our saved programs.  So, i've been doing this for the last 4 months.  Moving the box from our room to the rec room for our little one to watch cartoons, then back to our room at night.  Suffice it to say, my wife is growing tired of this so I put a call into the technician as he wanted to make sure I call him first so the install doesn't look negative on his record.  No response.  I've been researching this for the last week and have come to the following conclusions. - Possible wire/coax issue.This seemed the most plausible, however, I was able to confirm we have the COMMSCOPE     Amp installed and the line to the X1 platform does in fact work based on the fact the older box works on the same line, so if it is some sort of wiring issue its lost at the Xi3 box or perhaps the older box requires a weaker signal to perform?  I've also seen many comments suggesting the COMMSCOPE amps are garbage.  Thats fine, but if it worked previously, and the older box works, would that still be the culprit?
    - Moca issue.I'm not entirely sure how this works, but when checking diagnostics, the grid shows 0's across the matrix.  Even with the older box active.  I'm at work currently so I cannot post the rest of the diagnostics, can provide that once I get home.- Hardware issue.  Even though these boxes worked when the technician installed and tested them, perhaps there is a hardware failure or these boxes are "bad".   Hopefully someone on here can help, I'd prefer not to have to contact customer service, follow all the trouble shooting steps I've perfomed ad nauseum and have a tech come out if possible.  However, if it has to happen then so be it. Thanks for your help in advance.

  • About the communication issues in the client-server program

    About the communication issues in the client-server program
    Hi, I have some questions about the communication issues in a java project, which is basically the client and server architecture. In brief, the client, written in java, can be deployed anywhere, and in the following part, assume it is in the LAN (Local Area Network) which is connnected to the internet through the firewall and/or proxy, and the server, written in
    java too, simply provides the listening service on a port in a remote machine. And assume the server is connected to the internet directly so that the scenario can be simple to focus on the core questions.
    My questions are as follows:
    1 About the relationship between the communication port and protocol
    Generally, protocols at the application level like HTTP, FTP have their own default port, e.g., HTTP is corresponding to 80,
    FTP is to 25. But it is NOT necessary for the web server to provide the HTTP listening service at port 80, right? E.g, Tomcat provides the HTTP listening service at 8080. So it means the default relationship between the application protocl and their port is some routine, which is not necessary to follow, right?
    2 Assume a LAN connected to the internet through a proxy, which only allows HTTP protocol, then questions are:
    2.1 Does the proxy recognize the HTTP request from the client by the port number (carried in the request string)? For example, when the server provides the HTTP listening service at 80, then the request from the client will include the port number 80, then the proxy will parse such info and decide if or not the request can be out.
    2.2 Does the proxy recognize the HTTP request from the client by protocol (carried in the request string)? For example, the protocol used in the communicatin should be included in the request, then the proxy can parse it to make the decision.
    3 In java programm, if using the HTTP protcol, then on the client: the corresponding API is java.net.URLConnection, right?
    If using the TCP protocol directly, then on the client:the corresponding API is java.net.Socket, right? In both cases, the server side use the same API, java.net.ServerSocket?
    Is it correct to say that the communication by Socket is faster than URLConnection?
    4 Take MSN messenger for example, which protocol does it use? Since proxy configure is only the possible option, so I guess generally the TCP protocol is used directly so that the better perfomrance can be achieved, right?
    5 Given 3 computers within the same LAN, can the client, proxy, server environment above be correctly simulated? If so, can
    you recommend me some typical proxy program so that I can install it to configure such an enviroment to perform some test?
    6 I guess there should be some software to find out which port number a given program/process is going through to connect to
    the remote machine, and which port number a given program/process is listening on? Also, what protocl is used in the given
    communication.
    7 Finally, regarding each of the above questions, it will be highly appreciated that if you can recommed some references,
    tutorials, books etc. In summary, what I care about is how to enable the java client behind the proxy and firewall to
    communicate with the remote server without problems, so if you know some good tutorials plz let me know and thx in advance!
    Finally, thanks for your attention so such long questions =).

    FTP is to 25. But it is NOT necessary for the web
    server to provide the HTTP listening service at port
    80, right? E.g, Tomcat provides the HTTP listening
    service at 8080. So it means the default relationship
    between the application protocl and their port is
    some routine, which is not necessary to follow,
    right?Not sure what you're saying here.
    There must be a server listening on some port. The client must know what port that is. If you open the connection using the Socket class, you'll explicitly specify the port. If you use some higher level class like URLConnection or something in the commons Net package, there's probably a default port that will be used if you don't explicitly specify another.
    There's no way for the client to know that the HTTP request will go to port 80 instead of port 8080. If you think the the client contacts the server without explicitly naming a port, and then asks the server "get me your HTTP server", and the port is determined from that, you're mistaken.
    Not sure if you're thinking that, but it sounded like you might be.
    2 Assume a LAN connected to the internet through
    a proxy, which only allows HTTP protocol, then
    questions are:
    2.1 Does the proxy recognize the HTTP request
    from the client by the port number (carried in the
    request string)? For example, when the server
    provides the HTTP listening service at 80, then the
    request from the client will include the port number
    80, then the proxy will parse such info and decide if
    or not the request can be out. I'm not sure, but I think most proxies and firewalls are configured by ports. I thought I'd heard of more sophisticated, higher-level ones that could understand the content to some degree, but I don't know anything about those.
    3 In java programm, if using the HTTP protcol,
    then on the client: the corresponding API is
    java.net.URLConnection, right?That's one way.
    You might want to look into this:
    http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/
    If using the TCP protocol directly, then on the
    client:the corresponding API is java.net.Socket,
    right? In both cases, the server side use the same
    API, java.net.ServerSocket? A Java client will user Socket, and a Java server will use ServerSocket and Socket.
    Is it correct to say that the communication by Socket
    is faster than URLConnection?Probably not.

  • Communication issues between domain controllers

    Hi everyone,
    I am experiencing some problems in communication between domain controllers in our organization
    We have three domain controllers, one of them is a Windows 2003 server service pack 2 which is physical (controller A), another which is Windows 2008 Service Pack 2 (controller B), also physical, and a third one (controller C) which is a Windows 2008
    service pack 1 and is virtual.
    I have problems with this last DC, it won't respond to pings, or DNS query. I can't Access it by remote desktop client even when it is enabled. I cannot update it, it prompts error messages if I try to do so.
    This problems are solved if I reboot it, it will work fine some hours or days, but not much longer. I have checked event viewer and I didn't found any message about this.
    I read some time ago it would be great to have a DC in a virtual machine, so I did it, but is it right?
    Do you know what might be going on with it? would depromoting it and seting it up again the best solución?
    Thank you very much.
    Best regards.
    David.

    This sounds like a NIC issue, which is odd since it is a virtual machine.  Have you checked the host for any logs about the client? 
    I think the first thing I would do is destroy the current virtual NIC card and add a new one.  Since this has nothing to do with Active Directory I would also suggest you post this in a forum of for the Host (VMWare or Hyper-V).
    Paul Bergson
    MVP - Directory Services
    MCITP: Enterprise Administrator
    MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security, BS CSci
    2012, 2008, Vista, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
    Twitter @pbbergs http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/paulbergson
    Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • Communication issue btw applications on SAP J2EE Engine6.20 & Websphere 6.0

    We have a customized SAP IPC application running on SAP J2EE Engine 6.20 and it is communicating with another application called Common Configurator or C2 running on WebSphere 4.0.5.
    Communication between customized SAP IPC application and C2 application is over RMI IIOP. SAP IPC application calls methods on stateless session beans in C2 application.
    Going forward, we want to connect to C2 running on Websphere 6.0 from this customized SAP IPC.
    When I am trying to connect to C2 on Websphere 6.0 I am getting the following
    exception :
    org.omg.CORBA.BAD_PARAM:   minor code: 0  completed: No
         at org.omg.CosNaming.NamingContextHelper.narrow(NamingContextHelper.java:48)
         at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.setOrbAndRootContext(CNCtx.java:278)
         at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.initUsingUrl(CNCtx.java:251)
         at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.initOrbAndRootContext(CNCtx.java:188)
         at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.<init>(CNCtx.java:68)
         at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtxFactory.getInitialContext(CNCtxFactory.java:30)
         at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:660)
         at javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:241)
         at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:217)
         at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:193)
    But the same setup is working fine for SAP J2EE Engine 6.20 and Websphere 4.0.5.
    Has anybody faced similar issue before ?
    Could anyone tell me what could be the possible reasons and how can I preceed on this.
    Additionally,
    SAP J2EE Engine 6.20 uses ORB implementation of the Sun JDK (1.3). And Websphere 6.0 is based on JDK 1.4 version.
    Thanks in advance.
    Harman

    This is what class org.omg.CORBA.BAD_PARAM all about :
    <i>Exception thrown when a parameter passed to a call is out of range or otherwise considered illegal. An ORB may raise this exception if null values or null pointers are passed to an operation (for language mappings where the concept of a null pointers or null values applies). BAD_PARAM can also be raised as a result of a client generating requests with incorrect parameters using the DII.
    It contains a minor code, which gives more detailed information about what caused the exception, and a completion status. It may also contain a string describing the exception.</i>
    <b>And Websphere 6.0 is based on JDK 1.4 version.</b> The JDK of websphere is an IBM implementation and differs a lot from the sun implementation. As well, WAS6.0 supports J2EE 1.4 also...may be you should check the release notes / documentation of WAS for compatibility issues if any.
    Regards,
    Amol

  • Cisco Catalyst Supervisor communication issue?

    Hey all,
    I had a slight issue regarding two supervisor engines on a Cisco Catalyst 4500 device where the keepalives between the two sups lost communication for roughly 50~ seconds.  This triggered an SNMP alert but it looks like they regained connectivity before a switchover was initiated.  Has anyone ever experienced anything like this before?

    You obviously need to configure the ports etc. but the switch should recognise the module as long as you have an IOS that supports it.
    There is nothing extra to do, you just slot the module in.
    If you are connecting all your distribution switches to the 6500 then if you don't need a vlan/IP subnet in multiple buildings then you should use L3 connections to the 6500.
    Note also that you may want to consider at some time in the future a second supervisor or another chassis as this 6500 with one supervisor is a single point of failure ie. if it goes then there is no communication between buildings.
    Jon

  • Adobe Download Assistant: errors 110 - communication & 105 - product already downloading...

    please see attached graphic--
    i've tried everything!  "reset product download", make a second attempt following the pop-up instructions, etc. 
    when that didnt even make a difference then i tried uninstalling [properly], rebooting, reinstalling, rebooting, tried with other products and they all give me the exact same communication problem [110]. 
    based on what the error [105] says, the products are supposed to show on the queue if incorrect then to restart the DL assistant to add again.  i do that and then i get the other communication error.  so i uninstall-reboot... and get stuck on the same loop!  there's nothing on the online|product help or in the forums, nothing at all. 
    this is so incredibly pointless, frustrating, & annoying, to say the least--
    is there anyone who can provide a solution? 
    isnt there a way to dl the product without having ot use the assistant that causes all this complication?
    i am able to dl everything else that does NOT use the assistant without any problems
    anyone?  please?
    thx so much!!!

    i cant believe i never got the reply auto-notification for your response when you posted it.  accidentally i just realized you replied!  so, i apologize for the late response---
    maybe the link was active @ the moment of your response, but today it's broken.  they must have taken it down...
    i wonder if there's an updated url that points to the info you suggested on that location... 
    thank you!

Maybe you are looking for