XBT1* prioritization

I have two scenarios coming from ECC which pushes IDOCs to multiple receiver systems. I created a Sender/Receiver ID as follows
Sender Component : ECP
Interface Name : *
Namespace : urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
So the above rule covers both scenarios. I have created queue rule to assign messages with size less than 1000KB to assign to high priority queues XBT1* and tested the rule which is working.
Now i see in production, all the messages coming from these two scenarios are assigned in normal queues XBTo.They are not taking the XBT1 queues..
can any one let me know possible error i might have made.
Thanks
Guru

Any inputs please

Similar Messages

Sync messages should have higher prioritization in IE than async messages

Hi there,
does somebody know how I can assign a higher prioritization to sync messages than to async messages in XI 3.0? In case of a bottleneck on the Integration Engine I want to get sync messages processed first. Message prioritization in SXMB_ADMIN does not work because it's ony applicable for async (EO / EOIO) messages.
Thank you.
BR,
Ralph N.
UPDATE: Since there doesn't seem to be a solution for this issue let me specify it. What kind of installation can be made in the landscape to separate sync messages physically from async messages?
Edited by: Ralph Nitschke on Jun 25, 2010 1:58 PM

hi,
i found some links, hope those helps you
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/20bb9649-e86e-2910-7aa9-88ed4972a5f6
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/DifferencebetweenSXMB_ADMandSXMB_ADMINISTRATION
Queue prioritization
** Queue Prioritization in SXMB_ADM - Tuning Param - Whats the difference
Also try searach in ussing by "queue prioritization" in SDN you will find many links
Thanks
Rodrigo P.
Edited by: Rodrigo Alejandro Pertierra on Jun 25, 2010 10:25 AM

Help with creating a way to prioritize choices

Hi everyone. I am trying to create a survey in forms central and am having difficulty with one function. I would like for their to be a list and for respondents to be able to prioritize which items they would like in a future knowledge management system. For example, the question would read "please prioritize the fruit you would like for a snack" apple, banana, orange, pineapple, berries. Is there a way to do this?? I have tried to create this with a rating scale but the program would essentially allow every single option to be #1 priority. Any help is appreciated!!

What if you used a series of drop-down lists or single-choice lists?
For example:
What is your preferred fruit for a snack:
     Banana
     Apple
     Blueberries
What is your second preferred fruit for a snack:
     Banana
     Apple
     Blueberries
It doesn't exactly meet your need, but it might help.
There *is* a way to do this, but it involves a large number of show/hide rules. For example:
What is your preferred fruit for a snack?
     Banana
     Apple
     Blueberries
You would also build the following questions, with the rules to only show them if appropriate:
What is your next preferred fruit snack? (show if Banana was chosen for question 1)
     Apple
     Blueberries
What is your next preferred fruit snack? (show if Apple was chosen for question 1)
     Banana
     Blueberries
What is your next preferred fruit snack? (show if Blueberries was chosen for question 1)
     Apple
     Banana
... and so on.
Cumbersome to set up... but it works.
I hope that helps,
Brian

How to handle message prioritization in interface determination

Hi Experts,
How to handle the prioritization of messages if we say that for single source message it will be forwarded to 2 types of target messages.
Here's the scenario:
InterfaceDetermination object
SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeA
SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeB
Since both of the target messages will receive the source message, i want to prioritize that TargetMessageTypeB will be receive it first before TargetMessageTypeA.
Should I structure it in the Interface Determination as this:
SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeB
SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeA
or this should be handled by BPM? Let say BPM is the last option how could this be configured in ID?
Cheers,
R-jay

Hello Folk,
you have once option in the interface determination check the maintanence order at runtime , it will solve your problem.
regards,
Ravi.

Improve queue Prioritization

Dear experts,
we have scenarios with different priority on our SAP PI 7.0 system.
1. Async: File to IDoc (low priority)
2. Async: IDoc to File (high priority)
The scenarios are configured in SXMB_ADM ("Configure Filter for Queue Prioritizazion") and the messages are attached to the correct queues. However, when there are lots of messages in the low priority queue, also high priority messages get delayed. They are still processed much faster than low priority messages, but sometimes there is a delay of some minutes. Please note, that I'm talking about delays in Integration Engine NOT Adapter Engine.
Is it possible to configure a high priority queue, so that messages are always processed directly?
Best regards,
David

Thank you for your answer.
The following queues are configured:
Queue name               Type Mode Max. Runtime Attempts Pause
XBQ1*                     R    D       120         30     300
XBQ9*                     R    D        30         30     300
XBQA*                     R    D       120         30     300
XBQB*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBQI*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBQO*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBQX*                     R    D       120         30     300
XBQY*                     R    D        30         30     300
XBQZ*                     R    D        30         30     300
XBT1*                     R    D       120         30     300
XBT9*                     R    D        30         30     300
XBTA*                     R    D       120         30     300
XBTB*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBTI*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBTJ*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBTL*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBTM*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBTO*                     R    D        60         30     300
XBTX*                     R    D       120         30     300
XBTY*                     R    D        30         30     300
XBTZ*                     R    D        30         30     300
High priority messages get processed with Queue XBTA and low priority with XBTZ.
We increased the polling interval, but we still have the problem, as the files are very big.
Do you have any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Message prioritization

Hello,
We need to implement prioritization for messages going from B2B to BPEL. The client will have a very large number of incoming messages of different types. Some are more important than others and must be handled in a timely way. If the system is overloaded the most important messages should be processed by BPEL first.
Even better would be to prioritize before the messages are picked up by B2B, but as far as we can see that is not possible without writing something that sits in front of B2B and we don't want that.
Is it possible to control the AQ priority so that B2B uses a different priority for messages that fulfill some criteria (for example that have a specific EDIFACT type)?
If not our current design is to read the messages from the standard AQ queue and put them on a new one in a PL/SQL program or using the ESB, setting priority in the new queue. The BPEL code would then read from the new queue. Does that sound reasonable, or is there a better way?
Thanks in advance for any pointers,
-Erik

Hello,
We need to implement prioritization for messages going from B2B to BPEL. The client will have a very large number of incoming messages of different types. Some are more important than others and must be handled in a timely way. If the system is overloaded the most important messages should be processed by BPEL first.
Even better would be to prioritize before the messages are picked up by B2B, but as far as we can see that is not possible without writing something that sits in front of B2B and we don't want that.
Is it possible to control the AQ priority so that B2B uses a different priority for messages that fulfill some criteria (for example that have a specific EDIFACT type)?
If not our current design is to read the messages from the standard AQ queue and put them on a new one in a PL/SQL program or using the ESB, setting priority in the new queue. The BPEL code would then read from the new queue. Does that sound reasonable, or is there a better way?
Thanks in advance for any pointers,
-Erik

Filter for queue prioritization ...

Hi guys,
I have a question relating to filters for queue prioritization. I have defined filter for large messages (i.e. messages larger than 2048kB should go into XBTL queue). Is it possible to define another one that would say:
"All messages from Sender Name XXXXX larger than 1024kB should be passed into XBTL queue" ?
I know how to create such filters for other queues but XBTL queue is special case.
Do you know how to do it?
Thanks in advance!
Regards
Zbynek

Hi,
Please find the link for "How To prioritize XI messages in queues" below.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/59e837d3-0201-0010-c096-dc1869733413.reward me if useful. Let me know if ur issue not resolved.
Thanks,
Ramesh

Prioritize the Purchase Requisiotions/PO's as per requirement

Issue :- In my current system there will be alot of pending PR's & PO's.I couldn't able to followup these and sometimes i am not able to deliver the materials in time.
Assumption :- I think there is a new feature called "Requirement Prioritization "with EC 7.0 version.
So could you please share with me if you have any solutions.
Cheers,
Anil

Hello Sachin,
Standard SAP forms pick up the delivery address that was determined in the Purchase Order line. Normally this is either the Plant address or, if maintained, the storage location address. The storage location address can be maintained in customizing under "Enterprise structure - Definition - Materials Management - Maintain Storage Location".
The form checks the delivery addresses on the different PO lines. If these are all the same, it displays the address in the document header. If not, then it displays this per line item. If the printout does not show the PO line delivery address from the plant or storage location, the logic in the form is probably different from standard SAP logic. In this case, you should look for solving this in the Form, in combination with the standar SAP logic for determining the delivery address in the Purchase Order.
Regards,
Sjaak van den Berg

How does iTunes prioritize loading to iPod when more than 5 accounts?

Unfortunately, my absent minded son has opened up multiple accounts (4 as a matter of fact) when he has received iTunes cards, not knowing (until now) that his ipod will only take 5 accounts max. Given that his two sisters and I also have accounts, we have 7 on the same library. He does not sync the whole library and we have gone through his playlists to exclude his sisters' songs (which is an ordeal all on its own). I then reset his ipod and synced his playlist first, so that his four accounts and mine would be the ones which were loaded onto his ipod. This seemed to work until we included "music videos", which included some of his sisters' videos. I had assumed that they would not be loaded because the 5 accounts had been filled, but they did and the songs from his two most recent accounts were "de-synced". How does iTunes prioritize the 5 accounts and how can I make sure the 5 that we want are the ones loaded? Thanks in advance,
Kevin

i know you can only register 5 computers to use ipod
This is incorrect.
You can authorize a max of 5 computers to play your iTunes purchases.
how do i get rid of the accounts registered to my ipod
Accounts are not registered to an iPod.
Tp play songs in iTunes, you need to authorize teh computer. To authorize teh computer, play a purchased song. It will tell you that you need to authorize the computer by inputting your username and password.

Requirement Prioritization - ERP Materials Management

Hi,
I have activated Requriement Prioritization functionality and carried out folloing customization:
I. Activate Requirement Prioritization
Prio Active: x
Req. Priority (RP): 20
Req. Urgency (RU): 2
II. Define Requirement Urgency Groups
A = High
B = Medium
C = Low
III. Define and Assign Requirement Urgencies
RU              Text for RU            UG
1                 High                       A
2                 Medium                  B
3                 Low                       C
IV. Define Organizational Priorities (using the existing Organizational Priority)
Org Prio            Text for Org Priority
1                       Operating Forces
2                       High Readiness Forces
3                       Low readiness Forces
4                       Basic Org Supporting Oprtng Forces
5                       Others
V. Assign Plants and Storage Locations
Plant            Sto.Location         Name 1            Descr. Sto.Loc.          OrgPrio
1000            1001                     Plant                Storage                      5
VI. Define Requirement Priorities
Req.Prio.        Text for req. Prio.            UG          OrgPrio
10                  H                                     A              5
20                  M                                     B
30                  L                                     C
Issue: Based on the above settings I expect the Requirement Urgency (RU) is automatically defaulted as '1' in the Purcahse requistion which is created from a sales order (Pur. req. account assigned to the sales order). However, the requriement Urgency is not assigned to the Purchase requisition. besides, when the Purcashe order is created it gets the RU = 2 default from the RU activated in Step # 1.
Please let me know if I missed something. Thanks in advance for your feedback !
with regards,
Arup

Hi Suraj,
Thanks for the response. However, just to clarify the issue again.
Requriement:
1. Activation of Requirement Prioritization funcitonality for Purchase documents (Purchase Requisition and Purchase Orders)
2. Based on Plant and Storage Location Combination determination of Requirement Urgency on the Purchase documents.
To my understanding available BAdIs are for determining Organizational priority if additional information from the purchase documents are to be considered.
As mentioned the issue is with the standard organizational priority determination based on Plant+Sto.Loc combination (i.e. 5 as per the configuration setting made in the system) and subsequent determination of Requirement Urgency (i.e. 1 as per the configuration made in the system) on the Purchasing documents is not working.
BR/Arup

Prioritize order of iView loading and refresh

Is there a way to specify the order iViews get loaded / refreshed on a page?
I have some iviews on Navigation panel that I would like to load before the iviews loaded in the content area load. Unfortunately, they are loading the opposite way.
Mark

Hi Mark,
There is no such ready to use feature to prioritize the order of iView loading.
The only way to achieve this is to use the EPCF client site eventing feature and reload the Iview one after another.
Prerequisite:
IView should be URL Isolated on the Page
Example senario:
You have two IViews A and B and you want to load A after B loads. In IView B have a script to refresh IView A.
EPCM.raiseEvent("urn:com.sapportals:pagebuilder", "refresh", )
Greetings,
Praveen Gudapati
[Points are always welcome for helpful answers]

APS,Is it possible to prioritize purchaising orders by date(EnhanceReserv)?

Im trying to understand how R12 works and i defently need some help. Im just trying to undestand how APS (available to promise) work. In the field that I´m working, the company is asking me to understand and see if inside the module of "Enhanced Reservations" there is a way to prioritize all the purchaising orders by "date of orders", meaning if there is a way that Oracle can automatically define which order should be fullfilled by promising a product to the right order depending on the importance of the criteria given. I ve been looking around and i just cant find information with details about every single aspect of APS that could lead me to a complete knowledge about its functions. I will really apreciate if you could give me some advices. I already downloaded the presentation about R12 Enhaced Oracle in this website but i still need more descriptions about this feature.
Regars
Erick Villeda

Im trying to understand how R12 works and i defently need some help. Im just trying to undestand how APS (available to promise) work. In the field that I´m working, the company is asking me to understand and see if inside the module of "Enhanced Reservations" there is a way to prioritize all the purchaising orders by "date of orders", meaning if there is a way that Oracle can automatically define which order should be fullfilled by promising a product to the right order depending on the importance of the criteria given. I ve been looking around and i just cant find information with details about every single aspect of APS that could lead me to a complete knowledge about its functions. I will really apreciate if you could give me some advices. I already downloaded the presentation about R12 Enhaced Oracle in this website but i still need more descriptions about this feature.
Regars
Erick Villeda

Prioritize data on one SSID on an autonomous AP with multiple SSIDs

Hello,
I have a standalone AP(AP1261N) which is configured with 3 SSIDs.I would like to prioritize any data flow on SSID 1 for example so that users on SSID 1 are always functional independent on what is happening on the other SSIDS.
Then have the SSID 2 with a lower priority and SSID 3 lowest priority.
Each SSID is associated with a vlan.
I have seen some posts describing that this can be done using QOS associated with the different vlans.
Could someone please explain how I could configure the AP to do so?
I am using Command line.
Thank you

Hi Kavi,
Here are the few important points you need to understand when it comes to Autonomous AP QoS (this is extract from the link provided by Scot in above).
The QoS implementation for wireless LANs differs from QoS implementations on other Cisco devices. With QoS enabled, access points perform the following:
•They do not classify packets; they prioritize packets based on DSCP value, client type (such as a wireless phone), or the priority value in the 802.1q or 802.1p tag.
•They do not construct internal DSCP values; they only support mapping by assigning IP DSCP, Precedence, or Protocol values to Layer 2 COS values.
•They carry out EDCF like queuing on the radio egress port only.
•They do only FIFO queueing on the Ethernet egress port.
•They support only 802.1Q/P tagged packets. Access points do not support ISL.
•They support only MQC policy-map set cos action.
•They prioritize the traffic from voice clients (such as Symbol phones) over traffic from other clients when the QoS Element for Wireless Phones feature is enabled.
•They support Spectralink phones using the class-map IP protocol clause with the protocol value set to 119.
Also it is important to understand what type of traffic get impacted by AAP QoS. When you configure AAP for QoS it will primarily affect downstream traffic from AP to Client (No control over traffic coming from wireless client to AP - where priority will determine by WMM UP of clients traffic)
As you can see in the above, only FIFO available on ethernet egress (from AP to rest of your network) & then depend on how do you configure network switch ports connected to these AP (either trust DSCP or COS) it will determine how QoS maintain within your wired network.
In unified wireless enviroment you can classify each SSID with different QoS profile (Platinum, Gold, Silver & Bronze) & control what is the max level of QoS priority packets will get in each SSID. But in autonomous world it is not straightforward like that.
HTH
Rasika

NWA PI Message Prioritization

Trying to use PI Message Prioritisation and I get the following message when logging onto NWA and selecting SOA Management Monitoring PI Message Prioritization. I
Message prioritization data provider not registered for this PI
have searched SDN, SAP Support and Google without any luck. Nothing I can find contains information on configuraing Message Prioritisation in NWA.
We are running 7.1 EHP1 SP3.
Any help that can be offered would be appreciated....

HI,
Interesting link regarding message prioritisation in RTWB. It appears to be a very simple method of prioritising messages but may prove useful. I'm still interested to know whats wrong with NWA. I have seen all the other links....
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/48/b2e00f6b156ff4e10000000a42189b/frameset.htm
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0b96675-87cf-2c10-b489-dee0ac03f782?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/media/streamingmedia/events/sap-teched-2009/sessions/soa-middleware/soa203%20general%20performance%20tuning%20with%20sap%20netweaver%20process%20integration/soa203.pdf
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70b8adc3-728c-2a10-7fad-d43f29074ef8?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/media/streamingmedia/events/sap-teched-2007/virtual%20teched%2007/no%20virtual%20track/epi214%20sap%20netweaver%20process%20integration-advanced%20adapter%20engine/epi214.pdf
Regards

Message Prioritization PI 7.1

Hi All,
I want to know how exactlyfunctionality of Message Prioritization of PI 7.1 and the type of scenario in which it can be seen exactly in real time ?
I have read all the onling help on this topic and now expect practical examples and explanation
Thanks,
Amit

PI7.1 features refer this blog:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/706005a3-3bd6-2910-91ae-a2016239bdcf
Advanncements of PI 7.1
1. Enterprise Services Repository as a central storage location for enterprise service definitions and lifecycle management data for all enterprise services (Concept of Folders,.
Using Folders in PI 7.1
Using Folders in PI 7.1
2. Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) 3.0u2013compliant services registry for runtime management of enterprise services.
XI : How To publish WSDL generated from XI to UDDI
XI : How To publish WSDL generated from XI to UDDI
WebAS : A step by step guide for Configuring UDDI registry on Local Server
WebAS : A step by step guide for Configuring UDDI registry on Local Server
3. Enterprise Service Oriented Architecture (ESOA), Global Data Types, Modeling Tool Concept.
ESOA BASICS
SAP Architecture u2013Enterprise SOA Basics
SAP Architecture Enterprise SOA Basics
Quick Guides for setting up an eSOA prototyping environment with CE, ESR, and NWDS
Quick Guides for setting up an eSOA prototyping environment with CE, ESR, and NWDS
ESA = SOA + ES ?
ESA = SOA + ES ?
PRINCIPAL PROPAGATION
Principal Propagation with SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Principal Propagation with SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Principal Propagation in SAP XI
Principal Propagation in SAP XI
Modeling tools in PI 7.1
Modeling tools in PI 7.1
Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry
Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry
Using CCTS in PI 7.1
Using CCTS in PI 7.1
4. Improved support for standards such as Web Service Reliable Messaging (WS-RM), WS Policy, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML).
5. Support Business Activity Monitoring (BAM).
XI: BAM - Episode III - new super trace
The specified item was not found.
XI: BAM - Episode II - Simple Proactive monitor
The specified item was not found.
XI: BAM - Episode I - Introduction s
The specified item was not found.
6. Advanced Adapter Engine Features (Eg. Bypass Integration Engine Process)
7. Enhancement for Mapping (Eg. Re-usable User Defined Functions, Look-up function reads multiple fields, Specify mapping parameters at configuration time, Synchronous DB RFC lookups, Message Packing etc.)
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Correct Structural Inconsistencies
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Correct Structural Inconsistencies
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Graphical Support for JDBC and RFC Lookups
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Graphical Support for JDBC and RFC Lookups
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Mapping Enhancements Blog Series
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Mapping Enhancements Blog Series
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Mapping Enhancements Demo
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Mapping Enhancements Demo
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Copy XML Subtree
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Copy XML Subtree
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Using Graphical Variable
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Using Graphical Variable
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Share User-Defined Functions
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Share User-Defined Functions
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Import SQL Table's Metadata
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Import SQL Table's Metadata
MAPPING LOOK UPS
Lookupu2019s in XI made simpler
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/23/lookup146s-in-xi-made-simpler
XI: RFC Mapping lookups (from BC to XI?)
The specified item was not found.
Use this crazy piece for any RFC Mapping Lookups!
Use this crazy piece for any RFC Mapping Lookups!
SAP XI Lookup API: the Killer
The specified item was not found.
mapping look ups RFC api
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a03e7b02-eea4-2910-089f-8214c6d1b439
RFC Look up from XSLT mapping
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/05a3d62e-0a01-0010-14bc-adc8efd4ee14
Data Lookup Optimized
Data Lookup Optimized
8. Extended support for high volume scenarios
huge processing of files
Night Mare-Processing huge files in SAP XI
Step-by-Step Guide in Processing High-Volume Messages Using PI 7.1's Message Packaging
Step-by-Step Guide in Processing High-Volume Messages Using PI 7.1's Message Packaging
SAP XI acting as a (huge) file mover
The specified item was not found.
Managing bulky flat messages with SAP XI (tunneling once again) - UPDATED
The specified item was not found.
New NetWeaver Process Integration how-to guide for typical high volumen replication scenarios.
New NetWeaver Process Integration how-to guide for typical high volumen replication scenarios.
9. Business Activity Monitoring for process definition of milestone monitoring (event correlation).
10. Improved SAP NetWeaver Administrator support for central configuration and administration of both mediated and point-to-point scenarios.
11. XML payload validation and validations using JAVA.
VALIDATING MESSAGES
Validation of Messages in SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure - SDN Member Session EPI213 at SAP TechEd '06 Amsterdam
Validation of Messages in SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure - SDN Member Session EPI213 at SAP TechEd '06 Amsterdam
SOA Middleware: XML validation error handling
SOA Middleware: XML validation error handling
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Validation
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Validation
Validations using Java for those not having PI7.1
Validations using Java for those not having PI7.1
Xml validation
XML Validation BPM:
VALIDATING INCOMING FLAT FILE
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part 1
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part 1
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part II
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part II
Validating messages in XI using XML Schema
Validating messages in XI using XML Schema
BPM:
Enhancements in ccBPM within SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Enhancements in ccBPM within SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
12. Process editor modeling enhancements: step groups, integrated alert management and configurable parameters.
13. Integration of human interaction (generic user decision).
14. Language dependent texts for end-user display.
15. WS-BPEL 2.0 adoption (Preview and implementation BPEL4People, BPLE-SPE Simple User Defined Functions can be configured directly in the process.)
Also refer this links for more clarifications:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/369142f195675ee10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/fb4cd3207c7063e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f36ce30f-0e01-0010-a89b-c158d07c44ff
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ec19c05d-0501-0010-09a2-b6db51b5318d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5441afe5-0601-0010-dba5-dc5f9d5caa9d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c50cddbb-0601-0010-92a7-f2a40ca68e6d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f027dde5-e16e-2910-97a4-f231046429f2
Refer these threads as well:
Advantages of using PI 7.1 over PI 7.0
PI 7.0 and XI 3.0
http adaptor on which factors we will use
Diff between XI and PI
differences between xi 3.0 and pi 7.0
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
give me main advantages of XI-7.0 TO XI-3.0
XI 7.0 vs Xi 3.0
XI/PI
XI vs. PI
XI 3.0 vs. PI (XI 7.0)
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
moving from XI 3.0 to PI 7

XBT1* prioritization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for