XI Table- Lockbox/ payment posting

Dear SAP Guru's,
I am working on mapping XI table back to Legacy system of Lockbox payment posting and I cannot get a 1 to 1 relationship. When I looked closer, it appears that among other things, I have multiple postings for the same check. This appears to be happening as a result of the users hitting the post or save button through FLB1.
I am not able to capture items manually left cash on account nor am I capturing reversal of postings.
What is the solution to capture these items appropriately in the XI table?
POINTS AWARDED

Hi CMM,
Do you know if it is necessary to do a data mapping for BAI2 file to SAP using the standard Lockbox load program RFEBLB00. I have been asked to do a data mapping document and my argument is that since it is the standard lockbox program picking BAI2 file, there is no need to do a data mapping.
Because BAI2 file layout already has 1 to 1 relationship to SAP known fields.
Am I right? Your answer will be appreciated. Will reward points.
D

Similar Messages

Lockbox / Payment advice and cash discount

Hello
I am using lockbox (EDI 823) to apply cash to customers. It happens that customers don't take cash discount or just take a partial cash discount. I have implemented exits in program RFBELB20 for other controls and invoice indentification.
When the transaction processed, the payment should be applied to the invoice. However, when it is posted by SAP, cash discount is selected and payment is rejected because the overall payment difference is too big.
In F-28, I can either deactivate the cash discount, or force the cash discount amount, either to zero or to a value less than the maximum cash discount allowed.
In the table AVIP (payment advice detail), I have the fields WSKTO and XAKTS that, I supposed would allow me to do the same as in F-28. But it is not working. I may not fill AVIP with the correct data.
How should I process this ? I can't imagine SAP does not allow this.
Regards

Any ideas ?

Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting - Customer Accumulation -

We are using the Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting for customer with the accumulation per month and checking the minimum/maximum withholding tax base amount to calculate the tax.
When we run the F110 transaction (Automatic Payment) the system creates a BIll of Exchange as Noted items and keep the accounting document created from the SD opened. After the customer pay the bill, the bank send a file informing the payment, then we clearing the accounting document.
But the system updated the WITH_ITEM Table and filled the fields AUGBL(Clearing Document) and AUGDT (Clearing Date) with the number and date of the BIll of Exchange that was created during the F110 running.
I am confused about this situation because according the Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting, the system only could updated the table WITH_ITEM with an accounting document. Noted items are not an accounting document.
I would like to konw if the system is working properly, or can have something wrong in our configuracion?
Thanks and regards
Augusto

Hi ,
In some countries there is requirement that you need to deducted Withholding tax either at time of Invoice or payment which ever is ealier . so if you get Invoice first then you deduct the Withholding tax on Invoice and define the tax type and assign to company . but if you make paymnet first which we called advance or down payment then we configure Withholding tax on payment .
If a vendor is liable for withholding tax on invoice it may be liable for payment as well if you think you may pay some advances .
Please let me know if you need more information

Diff between Payroll Posting & Payment Posting

Hi Friends,
Whats difference between Payment Posting & Payroll Posting
regards
Praveen P

Thanks for the input.
After running the payroll posting, do we need to run Payment Posting for all the employees.
Which table will it update after payment posting.
If we are not activated PRE DME and DME. do we still need to run payment posting.
Praveen PP
Edited by: Praveen P.P on Oct 20, 2010 6:54 AM

Payment Posting Program - PC00_M99_PPM

Hi Guys,
Can anyone please explain the use of Program "H99_POST_PAYMENT" (Payment Posting Program - PC00_M99_PPM)?
Also how is this program different from Traditional Posting Program (RPCIPE00 / PC00_M99_CIPE)? Can someone explain from
accounting point of view?
Thanks,
Sanjeev

Program "H99_POST_PAYMENT
Purpose
All payments are posted automatically with this report.
Features
If you have performed posting to Accounting (FI/CO), all open liabilities from Payroll are placed on the relevant liabilities accounts accounts, as well as the payments to employees.
In the standard system, as the payment medium is created for the payments to employees from HR, the system does not mechanically generate the corresponding liabilities accounts. Neither the DME preliminary program (programs RPCDTAx0, or RPCDTCx0 and HxxCDTC0, or RPRDTAx0 ) or the program for creating the data medium (programs RFFO*) perform posting in the FI general ledger. Therefore, if the system in HR generates the payment mediums for payments to employees, you must also perform manual postings in parallel. These manual postings are usually performed with the payment summary. In most cases, there is only one posting containing only a few posting items, that is, one posting item for each bank clearing account and each company code involved.
If, however, the liabilities are distributed according to expenses, more posting items are generated. You can no longer perform posting manually.
Selection
With the report H99_POST_PAYMENT, all payments are evaluated regardless of whether they have been paid or not. All wage types included in table BT and table T52POST_PAYMENT count as payments.
RPCIPE00
This program is used to post the payroll results to accounting/FI.
All wagetypes which are configured to the respective GL accounts using the symbolic account are simulated and the documents so generated using this reported are then executed thru PCP0 to have the values posted to the General Ledger.
Thanks and Kind Regards
Ramana

Difference between FI Posting and Payment Posting

Hello Experts,
Can anyone please throw some light on the use of Program "H99_POST_PAYMENT" (Payment Posting Program - PC00_M99_PPM)?
What does this program exactly do? Anyone who can answer me interms of Technical and Business Perspective.
Also how is this program different from Traditional Posting Program (RPCIPE00 / PC00_M99_CIPE)?
All inputs are appreciated.
Thanks,
Janga K.

Program "H99_POST_PAYMENT
Purpose
All payments are posted automatically with this report.
Features
If you have performed posting to Accounting (FI/CO), all open liabilities from Payroll are placed on the relevant liabilities accounts accounts, as well as the payments to employees.
In the standard system, as the payment medium is created for the payments to employees from HR, the system does not mechanically generate the corresponding liabilities accounts. Neither the DME preliminary program (programs RPCDTAx0, or RPCDTCx0 and HxxCDTC0, or RPRDTAx0 ) or the program for creating the data medium (programs RFFO*) perform posting in the FI general ledger. Therefore, if the system in HR generates the payment mediums for payments to employees, you must also perform manual postings in parallel. These manual postings are usually performed with the payment summary. In most cases, there is only one posting containing only a few posting items, that is, one posting item for each bank clearing account and each company code involved.
If, however, the liabilities are distributed according to expenses, more posting items are generated. You can no longer perform posting manually.
Selection
With the report H99_POST_PAYMENT, all payments are evaluated regardless of whether they have been paid or not. All wage types included in table BT and table T52POST_PAYMENT count as payments.
RPCIPE00
This program is used to post the payroll results to accounting/FI.
All wagetypes which are configured to the respective GL accounts using the symbolic account are simulated and the documents so generated using this reported are then executed thru PCP0 to have the values posted to the General Ledger.
Thanks and Kind Regards
Ramana

Maintain acct determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX / IGX (M8395)

Dear Guru,
I am testing IS-Oil & Gas (Downstream) - Exchanges.
Created Exchange Agreement and Purchase Contract and Sales Contract, Purchase Contract and Sales Contract are assigned to the Exchange Contract.
A PO is created with reference to the Purchase Contract.
Upon post goods receipt in MIGO, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGR to get through.
A call-off is created with reference to the Sales Contract.
Similarly, when PGI is performed in VL01N, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IGX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGI to get through.
Checked in OBYC, there is no transaction key for IRX and IGX.
Please advise. Thank you.
Regards,
WL

Hi WL,
Please use transaction code O54E to maintain the required configuration.
I hope this helps you.
Thanks & Regards
Kalpesh Chavda

Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (M8395)

Dear Guru,
I am testing IS-OIL - Exchanges.
Created Exchange Agreement and Purchase Contract and Sales Contract, Purchase Contract and Sales Contract are assigned to the Exchange Contract.
A PO is created with reference to the Purchase Contract.
Upon post goods receipt in MIGO, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGR to get through.
A call-off is created with reference to the Sales Contract.
Similarly, when PGI is performed in VL01N, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IGX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGI to get through.
Checked in OBYC, there is no transaction key for IRX and IGX.
Please advise. Thank you.
Regards,
WL

Hi WL,
In an Exchange scenario, the account determination entry would have to go added through tcode O54E for this purpose. You would see both the IRX and IGX entry in the above mentioned tcode.
Menu path: IS-OIL Downstream --> EXG --> Account Assignment
You would not be able to see the IRX or IGX transaction key in OBYC.
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.
Edited by: Kok Wai Phang on Jul 10, 2011 7:58 AM

Table for Payment Terms

Good day!
Is there an available table for Payment Terms?
Thank you!

1.     TVKGGT-          TEXTS FOR CUSTOMER CONDITION GROUPS(CUSTOMER MASTER)
2.     TVZBT    -          CUSTOMERS:TERMS OF PAYMENT TEXTS
3.     TINCT     -     CUSTOMERS:INCOTERMS:TEXTS
4.     DD01T     -      domain Descriptions
5.     DD07T     -      Domain Value descriptions
6.     DD07T     -     DD: Texts for Domain Fixed Values (Language-Dependent)
7.     DD07V     -     View on fixed values and domain texts
8.     DD03T     -     DD: Texts for fields (language dependent)
9.     DD03L     -     Table Fields
10.     DD07V will contain all the domain values.

Problem when change bank clearing account for payment posting.

We recently changed the bank clearing account for payment posting (program PC00_M99_PPM). But I found out because the config can only be changed but not delimited on payroll side, the program errored out when it retro back for an employee to the old clearing account. So what am I supposed to do to fix this problem?
Have anyone ever handled this problem before and could please throw some light on it?
Thanks in advance.
Johnson

hi
check following
1. Check in OMWD, whether Valuation grouping code "0001" ia ssigned to Ur plant
2. OBYC - If you have assigned GR/IR Clearing A/c to WRX then check whether you have maintained it with combination of valuation class and GL A/c
If yes then maintain only GL A/c w/o valuation class OR maintain one entry with valuation class empty and GL A/c
check following
Error in service entry sheet
Re: Error in ML81N
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/grir-clearing-account-wrx-doesnt-recover-gl-account-2224137?cv=expanded
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-ps/problem-while-posting-service-entrysheet-in-ecc-60-version-1483547?cv=expanded#
regards
kunal

R12 - Approach to Insert into custom table after payment is done

Hi,
I have a requirement to insert into a custom table after invoice payment in R12. Code units are already in place to load data from ap tables to custom one.
I have identified 2 ways in which this can be done:
1. Call from the business event oracle.apps.ap.payment
2. Call after the program 'Send separate remittance advice' completes, again as a business event after the concurrent program completes i.e. to use 'Request Completed' business event.
My questions are as below:
1. Is there any other way in which I can write to a custom table after payment is done
2. How else can after report trigger be fired for SRA in R12 (without customizing the standard SRA java conc pgm)
3. When exactly business event 'oracle.apps.ap.payment' will be fired? Will it be fired for all payments irrespective of the way payment is done like thru PPR, payment workbench, etc?
Please share your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Kavipriya

in our case, we have created a database trigger on IBY_PAY_INSTRUCTIONS_ALL, to insert the requisite data into custom tables whenever the payment status is "Ready for Printing"

Copy BSEG SGTEXT in Payment Run (F110) to Payment Posting Document

Hi,
Client creates a Vendor Invoice using F-43 and they are entering in Text on each line (BSEG-TEXT). They then run F110 to produce payment and they wantt the BSEG-TEXT field from the Vendor Invoice Document to be copied to the Payment Posting Document BSEG-TEXT field.
Is there a user exit in SAPF110V or SAPF110S that can be used or is there some other method?
Thanks

Please check by giving sort key 24 - document header text in Bank Gl Account master data

Alternate Payee Number not capture during Manual payment posting (FBZ2)

Dear Friend,
Appreciate if anyone can help me with below issue.
Scenario:
- Vendor master already been updated with the alternative payee number.
- I have create a vendor invoice with payee data in the field BSEG-EMPFB.
Problem:
When I perform FBZ2 - post outgoing payment and select the invoice created, the payee field was not updated automatically neither based from the original invoice nor vendor master. Furthermore, the field was greyed out during payment posting.
Pls help how can I cantured the payee number based from the original invoice during post outgoing payment.
Thx.

Hi Kiran,
Here is my answer to your Q.
1. Have you given alternate payee in vendor master
- YES, at the genral data->payment transaction and also at alternative payee in doc. I already insert the payee number.
2. While doing FBZ2 in account give the alternate payee and when you go inside it tells no open items found
-NOT exactly, coz i dont use the alternate payee number for choosing open item. I use the same vendor code as per invoice.
3. Click other items and click process open items there you will find the open invoice of the the vendors.
-NOT applicable as i already select the vendor based from the invoice to be made.
When I choose open item during FBZ2, entered the main vendor code as per invoice to be made. In the invoice, the alternate payee number is there already. Just during FBZ2 the field is greayed out, hence the payee number from invoice wav not adopted when manual payment was done.
I notice if i use the FBZ2, the payee field is not open for entry.
Pls help.
Thanks.

Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting

Hey Guys, I'm configuring Withholding Tax for a company. I know the purpose for defining the withholding tax type for invoice posting, but do understand where is the Withholding tax type for payment posting used? Is it used for advance(down) payment or something else?
Thanks,

Hi ,
In some countries there is requirement that you need to deducted Withholding tax either at time of Invoice or payment which ever is ealier . so if you get Invoice first then you deduct the Withholding tax on Invoice and define the tax type and assign to company . but if you make paymnet first which we called advance or down payment then we configure Withholding tax on payment .
If a vendor is liable for withholding tax on invoice it may be liable for payment as well if you think you may pay some advances .
Please let me know if you need more information

Withholding tax-payment posting

Dear all
I am getting an error in which with holding tax calculation for payment posting is not calculated when we enter the invoice f-43. But it shows withholding tax is activated when i enter an invoice. What should i do?
Another error which I am getting is TO43G is missing. This error comes when I enter payment posting in f-53. What should i do? It is related to tolerance group.
Thanks in advance,
A. Anandarajan.

Hi Anandarajan,
Regarding first error, Check your WHt tax type setting. there is a sel. tag for post w/tax amount. check whether it is ticked or not.
In relation to second error create tolerance group for vendor account. Following is the menu path for the same.
IMG -> Fin Actg -> AR/AP -> Busi Tran -> Outgoing payment -> Manual Outgoing payments -> Define tolerances (vendors)
Hope it helps you.
Reward points if it helps.
JS

XI Table- Lockbox/ payment posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for