ZFS per-user quota availability

Hi,
I am just wondering if the new Solaris 10 update will include per-user quota for one ZFS file system?
To be able to auto mount cross different file systems as exported by ZFS, one must use autofs4, which is an requirement very difficult to meet. We run different Linux distros/Unix and versions of various Linux and Unix. It's not possible to upgrade autofs to the latest autofs4 on all of them. Also we need to keep different versions around.
Simon

Let's use an example. Create one file system for each user, user1, user2 and user3.
/export/home/user1
/export/home/user2
/export/home/user3
On one Linux client, user1 logs in and autofs auto mounts /home/user1. When user1 tries to change directory to /home/user2. Autofs would not mount /home/user2 because the autofs older than autofs4 can't cross a different file system to mount.
Simon

Similar Messages

Mail Per User Quotas Not Working

We just migrated from 10.9 server to the new 10.10 server and noticed that our per user mail quotas were no longer working. If I change the Server app - Mail setting - to have a global mail quota on it work, however, we have a few accounts that we need to leave unlimited and the per user quota will not override the global quota. So far we have had to leave the global quota disabled because of this.
Even without global quota turned off - trying to set per user mail limits is still not working. We are changing it thru the Server app and clicking users - selecting a user - then select edit mail options - and changing the setting for the limit size. No matter what we set it to - it will not work.
Does anyone know what command or how to change the per user quota limits from the command line? I found that Dovecotadm quota -u username shows you what the quota is, but I am stumped as how to change it via a command line or thru another method since the server app is not working.
Any help would be appreciated!
ps. Also posted my doveconf -n file below, but I am missing if there is anything not configured properly.
bash-3.2# dovecot -n
bash: dovecot: command not found
bash-3.2# doveconf -n
# 2.2.5: /Library/Server/Mail/Config/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Darwin 14.1.0 x86_64 hfs
aps_topic = com.apple.mail.XServer.a1c54f6d-f4ad-4431-b882-0f11570dd637
auth_mechanisms = cram-md5 plain login
auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb
auth_username_format = %n
debug_log_path = /Library/Logs/Mail/mail-debug.log
default_internal_user = _dovecot
default_login_user = _dovenull
disable_plaintext_auth = no
first_valid_gid = 6
first_valid_uid = 6
imap_id_log = *
imap_id_send = "name" * "version" *
imap_urlauth_submit_user = submit
info_log_path = /Library/Logs/Mail/mail-info.log
log_path = /Library/Logs/Mail/mail-err.log
login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l mpid=%e %c
mail_access_groups = mail
mail_attribute_dict = file:/Library/Server/Mail/Data/attributes/attributes.dict
mail_location = maildir:/Library/Server/Mail/Data/mail/%u
mail_log_prefix = "%s(pid %p user %u): "
mail_plugins = quota zlib acl fts fts_sk
managesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave
mdbox_rotate_size = 200 M
namespace acl-mailboxes {
list = children
location = maildir:/Library/Server/Mail/Data/mail/users/%%u:INDEX=/Library/Server/Mail/Dat a/mail/shared/%%u
prefix = shared.%%u.
separator = .
subscriptions = no
type = shared
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts {
    special_use = \Drafts
mailbox Junk {
    special_use = \Junk
mailbox Sent {
    special_use = \Sent
mailbox "Sent Messages" {
    special_use = \Sent
mailbox Trash {
    special_use = \Trash
prefix =
namespace list-archives {
list = children
location = maildir:/Library/Server/Mail/Data/listserver/messages/archive/lists/%%u:INDEX=/ Library/Server/Mail/Data/listserver/messages/archive/shared/%%u
prefix = archives.%%u.
separator = .
subscriptions = no
type = shared
passdb {
driver = od
passdb {
args = /Library/Server/Mail/Config/dovecot/submit.passdb
driver = passwd-file
plugin {
acl = vfile:/Library/Server/Mail/Config/dovecot/global-acls:cache_secs=300
acl_shared_dict = file:/Library/Server/Mail/Data/shared/shared-mailboxes
fts = sk
quota = maildir:User quota
quota_warning = storage=100%% quota-exceeded %u
quota_warning2 = storage=85%% quota-warning %u
sieve = /Library/Server/Mail/Data/rules/%u/dovecot.sieve
sieve_dir = /Library/Server/Mail/Data/rules/%u
stats_refresh = 30 secs
stats_track_cmds = yes
protocols = imap lmtp sieve pop3
quota_full_tempfail = yes
service auth {
extra_groups = _keytabusers
idle_kill = 15 mins
unix_listener auth-userdb {
    user = _dovecot
service dns_client {
unix_listener dns-client {
    mode = 0600
service imap-login {
inet_listener imap {
    port = 143
inet_listener imaps {
    port = 993
    ssl = yes
service_count = 0
service imap {
client_limit = 5
process_limit = 200
service_count = 0
service indexer-worker {
user = _dovecot
service lmtp {
unix_listener lmtp {
    mode = 0600
service managesieve-login {
inet_listener sieve {
    port = 4190
service pop3-login {
inet_listener pop3 {
    port = 110
inet_listener pop3s {
    port = 995
    ssl = yes
service pop3 {
client_limit = 5
process_limit = 200
service_count = 0
service quota-exceeded {
executable = script /Applications/Server.app/Contents/ServerRoot/usr/libexec/dovecot/quota-exceeded .sh
unix_listener quota-exceeded {
    group = mail
    mode = 0660
    user = _dovecot
user = _dovecot
service quota-warning {
executable = script /Applications/Server.app/Contents/ServerRoot/usr/libexec/dovecot/quota-warning. sh
unix_listener quota-warning {
    group = mail
    mode = 0660
    user = _dovecot
user = _dovecot
service stats {
fifo_listener stats-mail {
    mode = 0600
    user = _dovecot
ssl = required
ssl_ca = </etc/certificates/mail.maxxx.com.3524D1A33970C65E8A8DFF78E757DDE3C66AED10.chai n.pem
ssl_cert = </etc/certificates/mail.maxxx.com.3524D1A33970C65E8A8DFF78E757DDE3C66AED10.cert .pem
ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL:!ADH:!eNULL
ssl_key = </etc/certificates/mail.maxxx.com.3524D1A33970C65E8A8DFF78E757DDE3C66AED10.key. pem
ssl_key_path = /etc/certificates/mail.maxxx.com.3524D1A33970C65E8A8DFF78E757DDE3C66AED10.key.p em
userdb {
args = partition=/Library/Server/Mail/Config/dovecot/partition_map.conf global_quota=0 enforce_quotas=yes
driver = od
userdb {
args = /Library/Server/Mail/Config/dovecot/submit.passdb
driver = passwd-file
verbose_proctitle = yes
protocol lmtp {
mail_plugins = quota zlib acl fts fts_sk sieve
protocol lda {
mail_plugins = quota zlib acl fts fts_sk sieve push_notify
protocol imap {
mail_max_userip_connections = 20
mail_plugins = quota zlib acl fts fts_sk imap_acl imap_quota imap_zlib
protocol pop3 {
mail_max_userip_connections = 6

I guess the problem didn't resolve itself, rather it has revealed that it is intermittent (my favorite kind).
What could made a message sent to a legitimate alias username not get picked up during the imap connection. I know the smtp server accepted the message (see logs above).

How much table space will be alloctaed per user

hi all,
when a user is created how much table space will be allocated by default per user the oracle server or is there any default size fixed by the dba.
thanks and regards,
sri ram.

Untill the administrator doesn't specify QUOTA or grant UNLIMITED TABLESPACE to user Oracle account doesn't have available space in any tablespace, event in default:
SQL> create user new_user identified by new_user
2 default tablespace users;
User created.
SQL> grant create session, create table to new_user;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> conn new_user/new_user
Connected.
SQL> create table t(x int);
create table t(x int)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01950: no privileges on tablespace 'USERS'
SQL> conn / as sysdba
Connected.
SQL> alter user new_user quota 1M on users;
User altered.
SQL> conn new_user/new_user
Connected.
SQL> create table t(x int);
Table created.

Amount of Resources CPU and Memory per user

Hi,
We are looking to deploy a Line of Business Application via RemoteApp and a custom template. The application requires a significant amount of RAM and CPU, can someone tell me who much RAM and CPUs are allocated per session \ user? I would expect
that we would use the Standard tier if any difference to resources available.
Thanks
Giles

Hi James,
Currently there is no way to configure resources other than selecting either Basic or Standard. If you would like a lower per-VM user density (and thus higher resources for each user) what you can do is create more collections, and only assign
a small number of users to each.
For example, say you only wanted to have a maximum of 4 users on each VM, providing typically at least 1 vCPU per user. In this case you would create collections with the Basic plan, each linked
to the same template image, and only assign a maximum of 4 user accounts on the user access tab of each. Assuming each user uses 80+ hours a month, the total (before discounts) cost for each collection would be $228/month, making each user
cost about $57/month, slightly less than equivalent cost under Standard plan pricing if you factor in resources per user.
You probably already know this, but I will explain how scaling works normally for others that may read this. Azure RemoteApp will automatically create more VMs for each collection as needed to handle user load (Scale-Out) and shut down VMs when the
user load is reduced (Scale-In). The key thing that affects this scaling mechanism is the maximum concurrent users allowed on each VM, which for Standard is 10.
In your case you are asking if you can have more resources per user, hence my instructions above for creating multiple collections and limiting the number of assigned users to less than 10 each.
Depending on your unique needs it may make more sense to create a custom RDS deployment on Azure IaaS VMs. In this case you could control the size/type of VM used, user density, etc. Downside is you have to set up and manage more
RDS components than you do if you use Azure RemoteApp.
-TP

How to get the SharePoint user context available in custom federated search connector?

Hi,
I'm investigating the possibilities for developing a federated search connector for SharePoint 2013 Online. This should allow us to search a customer's database through our custom developed application (both on premise). We intend to develop
an remote federated search connector (using OpenSearch protocol) and configure a result source in SharePoint for that connector.
The problem I'm struggling with is that I want different search results from this ressult source based on the permissions of the user that is executing the search. The admin should find a lot because he has permissions on certain items in the custom
application. The employee should find just a few because he has no permissions on certain items in the custom application. We developed the custom application ourselveds and the search in that application is taking permissions into account: it doesn't
return results if a user doesn't have sufficient permissions. That part works just fine.
However, to be able to use that, the remote federated search connector must be able to identify the user that is executing the search in SharePoint Online. So: how do I get the SharePoint user context in the remote federated search connector?
I know I can configure the replacement token {User.Name} in the result source configuration, but that gives me the name of the user only. This is insufficient to get an identity, principal, token or whatever, that let's me log in into our custom
application.
I also know that in a provider hosted app, user context is passed through from SharePoint and is known within the remote app. But since result sources need fixed (or anonymous) credentials configuration for connecting to the remote federated search connector,
all users will be using the same credentials. This makes me assume these credentials are for securing communication and cannot be used within the execution of the search within the remote federated search connector.
At the moment, I'm stuck. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Ruud.

Hi,
Per my knowledge, we cannot get the SharePoint user context available in custom federated search connector with other methods.
Here is a similar thread for your reference:
https://answers.atlassian.com/questions/263735/atlassian-sharepoint-connector-federated-search-authentication-and-authorization
Thanks,
Linda Li
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Limit the number of session per user in the Wired dot1x environment with ISE 1.2

Hello,
I need to check if there is any configuration/workaround to limit the number of sessions/access per user in the Wired dot1x configuration.
I need to check if this feature is available or not to solve the following scenario:
I have 2 SW ports configured to use dot1x authentication with ISE 1.2 server.
If user A connects to the 1st port and authenticated then he will placed on a VLAN based on the authorization profile.
The case, that I need to deny the same user to connect on a different machine with the same credentials.
The ISE itself does not have this feature currently, the only feature available is to limit the number of sessions for the guest user.
Is there any workaround on the Cisco switches to solve this? Cisco WLC has this feature and for the VPN we can limit the number of sessions also from the ASA itself.
Thanks.

limit number of session per user using wired dot1x is not available in 1.3

Payment Distribution to Artists by per user plays, rather than total plays

Hello!
I just had a thought about how payment is distributed to artists that I wanted to see if anyone might have some thoughts on. Spotify still does come under criticism on occasion for artist payment distribution - I've seen a couple of instances of people citing iTunes as providing more monetary compensation to artists since it is per download, rather than per play, among other things. This seems to be especially true for independent artists, and artists who are generally less well-known.
I was wondering if Spotify has ever considered doing payment distributions using the
sum[ (total artist streams per user) / (total streams per user) ] across all users
ratio for payment calculation, rather than the currently used
(total artist streams across Spotify) / (total streams across Spotify)
approach, i.e. calculating the artists' play ratio by user, rather than in one giant pool. If you have considered this, I would love to hear why the current payment implementation was chosen rather than a per user method, such as the one listed above. But...
If a per user method has not been considered by Spotify previously, I think it would be nice - while I'm not an analyst myself, I imagine that it could lead to more revenue for independent artists, and maybe even less famous artists that are still beholden to rights owners for distribution of payment. I think it would do this because it could account for differences in number of plays per user - rather than users who tend to play more music over the course of a month contributing more all artists' payout, each user has an equal voice in how money gets distributed to artists.
I understand that such a switch would be difficult, and possibly insurmountable in the instance of free users - so, I am positing this as an idea not for all users, but for Premium users only. With Premium, it is a feasible goal, since you have a finite number of plays, and a finite amount of money coming directly from that user, and do not have to worry about trying to calculate differences in advertisement impact for different users. Doing that ratio calculation would be relatively straightforward of a switch computationally (though quite a large change in the system nonetheless, of course).
I think this type of change would empower both users and artists to use Spotify more. Firstly, it would empower artists to allow Spotify to play their music because the metrics they would get per month would be more reflective of the size of their fan base, and how much importance that fan base puts on the artists' music than current metrics.
Secondly, it would empower users more, which I think is especially important for users between 18-32 years of age. While I am not an expert on the subject, I often find that users in this age group (my age group) care a great deal about having control over where their money ends up, which in this case means knowing which rights holders and/or artists are getting the money they are spending. I know I do. Switching to this system, while still not addressing the injustices that are felt within the relationship between rights holders and artists by many, would still allow users to have more of a say in who gets their money than the current system. On top of that, it might be helpfult for Spotify itself - if using Premium is the only way for users to feel empowered by knowing how their money is distributed, it may encourage people in the free tier to upgrade to Premium in order to feel empowered.
Just a thought. I'd love to hear what you and others have to say about this idea.

@Merik thanks for the warm welcome, and for the quick, informative response!
I had the chance to take a look at that page you linked to before my original post, and saw that paragraph you quoted, as well as the bullet point about paid users having a higher "per stream" rate. I guess what I was more interested in (and perhaps this is not the right place to ask this question?) was if there was more of an in-depth "why" behind their decision (and thanks again for linking to it!) documented anywhere that I might be able to read more about. Maybe I was missing something on that page (and please let me know if so!), but the only "why" that I could find was a sentence in the paragraph you quote above:
"We believe, however, that our service and the lives of artists will both be best if the World’s music fans enjoy more music than ever before in a legal, paid manner".
While it's great to see their opinion, I was more curious about the line of reasoning behind that position is all. Because I do wonder whether empowering premium users to have more fine-grained control over how their money is allocated, such as by doing pay "per user", might lead to both more paid users and more revenue for independent and/or lesser-known artists - and if that's something that Spotify has researched already, I would love to hear more about the pros and cons behind such an approach!
Thanks!

How to set user quotas on a certain filesystem

Hi
It may be simple and easy question but I'm really new to this
I need to know how to set user quotas on a certain file system in details
I know it can be done easily in one step in Solaris ZFS
but how is it done in Linux ?
Thanks in Advance :)

See also:
How to set user quotas on a certain filesystem

Using Windows Server 2012 per-User RDS CAL on Server 2008 R2 Session Host

I have a Remote Desktop Licensing Server setup on my domain controller running Windows Server 2012 R2. I have installed a
’Windows Server 2012 Remote Desktop Services per-User CAL’ there and activated the licensing server already.
Currently I use ONLY Windows Server 2008 R2 machines as RDS Session Hosts (in the future I plan to transition them to 2012 R2, hence the CAL I bought is
already in the newest version).
I have already configured my WS 2008 RDS Session Hosts: set
Per-User licensing mode and specified license server address. The connectivity between my Session Host(s) and my License Server seems to be ok as the
Remote Desktop Session Host Configuration window on the Session Host correctly lists the 2012 per-user
license (CAL installed on server) from the license server.
On the License Server I can also see event logs entries (in
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-Licensing/Admin), indicating that the user has been issued a license.
The issue I am having is that the license being issued is
2008 Per User CAL license (Build-in OverUsed - temporary) and not the 2012 Per User CAL license which is the only license installed on the server. According to the RDS CAL interoperability matrix at
social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/14988.rds-and-ts-cal-interoperability-matrix.aspx, I was expecting the 2012 license to be backward-compatible with 2008 client (and that
in the absence of legacy licenses, the (only) 2012 license would be used for all clients connecting to the licensing server)
Before I bought my license, I found this document:
download.microsoft.com/download/3/D/4/3D42BDC2-6725-4B29-B75A-A5B04179958B/WindowsServerRDS_VLBrief.pdf
which says that - "newer version RDS CALs can be used with an older version of the server software" (In section FAQ, Q4), which means to me that
the 2012 license would work as-is for the 2008 Server and gives me flexibility when upgrading to the new server version.
How can I make this CAL work in my environment?
Note:
I have already explicitly disabled
Prevent license upgrade Group Policy setting which I assumed would fix the issue but nothing has changed.
Then I have enabled License server security group Group Polity setting
and added computers from my domain to RDS Endpoint Servers AD group. I have also created new AD group called
Terminal Server Computers and added the computer accounts there, but it changes
nothing. Reference - technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee791761.aspx , technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc725704.aspx and blogs.msdn.com/b/rds/archive/2009/09/17/control-the-issuance-of-rds-cals.aspx.
I found one potential ‘workaround’ which involved manually downgrading my CAL license by calling
Microsoft Clearinghouse. I am very reluctant do to so because, as I upgrade parts of my infrastructure to Server 2012, I’d need to then ask Microsoft to manually upgrade a part of my license back as well.
Am I missing something? What should I do to get my 2012 CAL to be issued to 2008 R2 server

Hi, I have tried several other possibilities.
I change expire date for my temporary assigned license (2008 CAL overused). It can be done, by changing Active Directory user properties – msTSExpireDate. When I restart my Session Host server and logged again, my license was renewed
for next 60 days (event ID - 4145).
I also delete information about license for this user (clear msTSExpireDate and msTSLicenseVersion). And the license was successfully removed from License Manager. After another SH restart it gets the same – 2008 overused – license
(event ID 4143 - license server has successfully issued …)
I now, that changing info in AD attributes is a little trick, and this is not a real value - only a reference, but it was useful to delete or change expiration date of license. But it didn’t change type of license as I expected.
Reference -
http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/243320-windows-2008-licensing-questions/
To TP:
I have found your post with information:
If you have a Server 2012 RD Licensing server you may install your 2012 RDS CALs on it (no downgrade necessary) and then set your Server 2008 R2 RDSH to
use the 2012 RDL server. The 2012 RD Licensing server will automatically issue the CALs as 2008. -
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/6046ded1-96bf-4d79-89ce-38aac2a6694e/can-we-use-windows-server-2012-rds-cal-license-in-rds-2008-r2-server?forum=winserverTS
And it showing my situation in brief. I also found
similar problems, but the solutions don’t meet my expectations.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/dcfb1966-89a8-4b5d-bf5a-ff03ac0b7a66/rds-cal-licenses-not-recognized?forum=winserverTS
– “sudden all of the CALS were available”
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/f1228599-8452-4a3e-a263-061de14bfcfe/server-2012-rds-builtin-overused-cals-issue?forum=winserverTS
– “this should go away after a while”
Is there a way to determine this time you mentioned before? Or should I just wait patiently…

Disable USB per USER

Hi guys,
i really need your help to disable USB per User. I have installed Windows WMS 2012 on a server and it is connected with USB to LG monitors, my issue is i have to disable USB devices per Monitor. Can anyone help me it is very urgent !!!
Kind Regards,

The easiest way is to set the permissions on the
printer utility for only the Admin account.
Go to the Applications\Utilities\Printer Utility.
Getinfo on the Printer Utility and set the "others"
to No Access.
Be sure to remove the printer(s) from the accounts
you don't want to have printing. This is a global
change and there won't be any printers available
under the users account. This will prevent (Kids)
users from adding a printer.
I just tried this and I could not get it to work for me. I changed the access on Printer Setup Utility and removed the proxy printers (~/Library/Printers) and all .plist files having to do with printing (~/Library/Preferences) from a non-administrative user account. I was still able to print from Word without any problems.
Also, when I Repaired Permissions, the permissions for the Printer Setup Utility returned to "factory specs" and "Others" again had Read permission.
Did I misinterpret your instructions?
Matt

Can we save the printing preference of FR reporting per report per user?

We are using Hyperion Planning and Financial Reporting version 11.1.1.1. Some of our users will generate PDF for printing (HTML format is badly printed out).
However can we have the option to save the printing preference of each FR report? As some reports are in portrait and some are in landscape format, it is preferred users can setup the printing preference per user per report so that they can choose the paper size and printing orientation.
Thanks in advance!

OK; should this be submitted to http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter/?
I'm unsure about the best setup for this, but here is some brainstorming:
- In Workgroup Manager or Directory, an administrator can designate a user to 'auto-accept' invitations if the user is available at that time.
- Ideally, one would be able to establish an ACL for auto-acceptance, so that a user or admin could designate a list of users/groups from whom a user should auto-accept invites.
- If a user is set to auto-accept, it is reasonable to assume that this user is either unable to use iCal or does not regularly check their calendar, so invites that are not auto-accepted should be handled somehow. For example, a notification could be e-mailed to the user, an invitation accept/decline message could be sent to the iCal account of a designated administrator or delegate, etc.
I am imagining this for the case of my division, in which we have one person scheduling for lots of people, but I think that the idea of being able to delegate a person to be able to add things to one's calendar without confirmation and to confirm invites from non-privileged users would be useful in other cases as well. For example, a boss wants an administrator/secretary to be able to schedule things on his/her calendar, but does not want this person to be able to see all of the details of existing items on that calendar. I suppose that in this case it would be unclear to which calendar the designate should add the event initially, but I'm sure that for many people the privacy of the boss's calendar is more important than the inconvenience of having to create a throwaway calendar for events created by the delegate.
If anyone has any thoughts to help refine this, please let me know and I will incorporate that into my writeup.
Thanks,
Greg

How to change the maximum number of process per user in BW ?

Hi,
Do you know how to change the maximum number of process allowed per user ?
With RSRT we can customize the number of process per query but I don't know where we can customize the maximum number of process per user.
In fact, my production environment reach always the max number of process available in SM50...
Thanks a lot

Hi,
A user is not have the No. of processor but a work process can handle N No. of users. If a user hit any transaction v acn say from a list of N worl proceesor which has been taken the work.
Correct if I am wrong.
Regards
Syed.

Unity Connection on BE6K. 10 messages per user????

I must be misreading this surely! The BE6K Data Sheet quotes
"Voicemail Capacity: 10 voicemail messages per user."
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/vcallcon/ps11370/data_sheet_c78-718398_ps11369_Products_Partner_Resources.html
Someone please tell me this is a misprint!
Rich

Its an estimate. Meaning if you have 1000 users with voicemail boxes, and you limit them to x minutes, its roughly 10 voicemails.
Voicemail usuage is based on minutes, not so much the number of messages. IE, (1) message that is 10 minutes long, (2) messages that are 5 minutes long, etc.

How works feature per-user value?

Can anyone help me with feature of per-user value of the element in custom Form?
I can not find the explanation in documentation of Novell vibe.
I would be appreciate too, if someone give me a link with an example of using this feature.
My purpose is to use this functionality in workflow, where in this field (element) would be comments of users who approve some document. Their comments can not be modified after approval. If there is a time stamp of this comment I would be really very happy.
Thanks for answer!
Alena

sualina,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

How to use the *new* "per-user remote control"?

Per the ARD discription page at: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/apple-remote-desktop/id409907375?mt=12
It says under "Whats New in 3.5.1":
"Per-user remote control
You can remotely log in to a Mac with any user account on that computer and control it, without interrupting someone else who might be using the computer under a different login.
How can I do this? I can't seem to find the ability. If I use ARD in it's "normal" mode, I am on the user's console at the same time they are.... I want to be "underneath" the console without affecting them.

That capability is only available if your client systems are running Mac OS X 10.7 Lion. See:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4715
Regards.

ZFS per-user quota availability

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for