Cproject problems with accounting settings

Hi all,
*I am not sure if someone can help me.*
*I am using cProjects suite 4.5, when I create a project ( in cproject) error message 'The settings for accounting integration contain errors' Message no. DPR_FIN_GECCO004 appears and the accounting tab is empty.*
*I am not sure where can be the problem, I have reviewed cproject configuration and I think it is correct.*
*Does anyone have a configuration guide? or at least may someone tell me what he has configued at this point IMG --> collaboration project -->Conection to external system -->Object link in sap system --> Make settings for calling a sap transaction -->Alias for the web server of a SAP transaction ?*
*Thank you very much for your help.*

Hi,
1.First define the cost/revenue rates used in costing.
2. Second imp activity is replicate cost revenue rates to R/3 system. if you using same system give RFC destination NONE. otherwise use your target system available to you. take help of basis if u dont know traget system. Activity given below when u replication cost revenue rates.
Activities
Enter the replication line and specify which rates you want to replicate under Selections.
If you do not specify a selection, all rates are replicated.
If you want to replicate the records only partially, and you do not want to post them in the target system, set the Test Run indicator.
After test run sucessful, plz uncheck that test rum box and replicate.
Thanks
Amit
note: award points for useful answer

Similar Messages

HT201304 problem with account settings

can you help with this email I received?
There was a technical problem that prevented us from automatically renewing your subscription for Pandora One. To avoid interruption of your subscription, first sign in to the iTunes Store from your device. Next, tap Manage App Subscriptions in your account settings and select your desired subscription period. We will then attempt your subscription renewal again.

Read this:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4098

Problems with accounting integration cProjects

Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
The project is unknown in Accounting
Message no.
DPR_FIN_GECCO006
Diagnosis
Etc..
In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released replicated.
No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001.
In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Jørgen Ruud

Hello Jørgen,
It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
code like following:
      ls_attribute-data_element     = space.
      ls_attribute-value            = '1000'.
      ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
      ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
      ls_attribute-struc_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-field_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_name    = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_value   = space.
      INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
regards!
Zhenbo

TS3899 iPad mail account says problem with 'ssl settings' - can you help me?

iPad mail account says problem with 'ssl settings' - can you help me?

The 4Gs hardware, only 256 MB of RAM, prohibits updating beyond 6.1.6.
Starting when iOS 7 was released, Apple now allows downloading the last compatible version of some apps (iOS 4.2.1 and later only)
App Store: Downloading Older Versions of Apps on iOS - Apple Club
App Store: Install the latest compatible version of an app
You first have to download the non-compatible version on your computer. Then when you try to purchase the version on your iPod you will be offered a compatible version if one exists.

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible Hany hassan 00

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store
There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction
Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible
Hany hassan
0096597617317
0096596677186
Thank you

You need to Contact iTunes Support...
Apple Support iTunes Store Contact Us

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

Problem with Mail settings - PDF document is not sending

Hi Experts,
During sales order confirmation, a PDF attachment used to be sent.
But now the customer is receiving the file with extension as .OTF instead of .PDF.
Where could be the problem with this? Is this something wrong in SOCT setttings?
But for some other scenarios, the same is working so i don't think that there is a problem with SCOT settings.
Please let me know if anybody has an idea about this problem or susgestion to find the problem
Regards,
Vijay

Hi Gangisetty,
I guess there is no need to change any settings.
You just need to change format from OTF to PDF using some FM.
You can refer following links for conversion of OTF to PDF.
Re: sending INVOICE as attachment in PDF for external Mail address
FM to send an email with a PDF attachment
http://an-abaper.blogspot.com/2009/07/sending-smartform-as-pdf-through-mail.html
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Vivek

Problem with Account determination

Hi all.
I have a problem with account determination when I change some data in Tcode VKOA.
For example:
I made changes in VKOA to determine G/L account 0000523201 and it worked it.
But in the account document the account that is displayed is different (0000501000) and I don´t know why.
I checked the Analysis Account Determination in VF03 and the system found the correct account in the access sequence, but I realized that there is a second line with the message G/L account in document 0000501000 . Where do I determine this account, or how Can I fix it ?
Thanks for any help.
Renato

Hi reanto
Check in VKOA all the G/L accounts for all the respective account keys. Also check wheather any provisional G/L account have been maintained or not. for any account key
Also check wheather twice if you have maintained for the same account key different G/L accounts
Regards
Srinath

Problems with server settings for IMAP account

hi
i am trying to configure Mail to work with an IMAP account. i can receive messages OK on this account, but cannot send mail. when i try to send mail i get an error message "sender verify failed".
there was an automated process for adding the account to mail which i installed, and got the following settings:
outgoing mail server: mail.soterianetwork.org
server port: 26
authentication: password
username: soteria
password: ****** (the password is correct)
the error message i get is 'sender verify failed'.
i have also tried ports 25 and 587 without success.
on the web based control panel for the mail account it says: Be sure to enable SMTP Authentication in your E-mail client or you may not be able to send mail.
not sure if i have done this. i have tried changing the outgoing mail server to smtp.soterianetwork.org, still without success
i would be grateful for some help to get this set up correctly
thanks
nick

it was a problem with the server. they changed some settings and all is working fine

Login in problems with accounts

I'm having major problems with my icloud and imessages accounts since updating from Mountain Lion to Mavericks. While I was using Mountain Lion, both accounts were linked up to my icloud.com email and NEVER experianced any problems. Then when I updated to Mavericks for some unknown reason it linked itself to my Gmail email account, which was always enlisted as a secondary email account. Now I cannot sign into my icloud (not the email account itself) because it continues to ask for me to enter a password of which it saids is incorrect. And then theres imessages - on both my iMac and iPhone, my contacts can't send me imessages nore use facetime. On there end for imessages it saids "iMessages Need to be Enable" (which under my settings it is), and for facetime it said "I'm unavailavle". After checking my online status with facetime it does indeed say I'm offline but when I try to change it to available by selecting it, it quickly closes; leaving me offline.
I really don't want happened and have no clue what to do. The whole thing went screwy after changing to Mavericks - quite frankly I'd rather Mountain Lion back, apart from having my accounts back to my icloud accout then my gmail and having my facetime and imessages working again.

System Preferences/iCloud - try signing out and then sign back in. I'd also try setting up your Messages account in Internet Accounts again.

Problem with configuration settings.

I have a Nokia 3110 classic .Recently I had a problem with Personal Configuration settings .
When I want to add new App types it displays "Cannot add new account.Memory Full."
So I also cannot be able to save Configuration settings as it displays"Only 70 sets allowed.Settings discarded".
So please help me.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

A workaround is available on internet, Not on this forum. But i am afraid i am not allowed to post it here.
Try to Google this keyword " Only 70 sets allowed.Settings discarded"
Previous Phones: 6600, 7610, 6230, 6230i, 1100, 1112, N70, N73, N95, N95 8GB, 5800XM, 5230, C5, iPhone 3GS, SE Xperia X10, N900, N8, SE Xperia Arc
Current Phones: Nokia N9, iPhone 4

Export Release Build - Problem with Server Settings

Hello, i have a big problem and i searched the whole day yesterday but didnt found an answer...
I started a Flex Mobile and PHP Project. The Project has a Data/Services included wich loads some customer from a database (sql)... for the first a
used Zend and try it local (http://localhost and used the htdocs Folder of Zend)... EVERYTHING WORKS PRETTY FINE... so NOW my problem
I wanted to export this project to a release build for my android phone... so the first warning of Flash Builder ist that the project ist currently configured to access data services from a local url. Before exporting the application, you may need to deploy your services to a remote server, then change the server root URL for your project. Click here to change server settings.
When i click the button i get the server setting.
Web root: C:\Program Files (x86)\Zend\Apache2\htdocs
Root URL: http://localhost
whe i change it now i get an eror:"The selected web root folder does not exist (i attached i screenshot of it).
i entered de domain of my server (i also tried the ip) at Root URL. And i think there ist a problem with the Web root...? i get scary

i know WHY Flashbuilder tells me that i have to change the setting when i deploy on the device
my problem ist that i got this error...
and the domain wich i have in the screenshot should only explain how i tried it...
i entered my server url (the real domain) and i entered the folder "app" wich i have created via ftp on my server...
BUT i also get this error (lik in the screenshot)
i think at ROOT URL i cant make lot mistakes .... http://myserver.de or the ip
but i think maybe my web root ist incorrect? i entered here the folder wich is directliy on my server...?
i dont know exactly but i got an error like in the screen

Problem with " Account assignment category"- Services

Hello expert,
I have a problem with the order positions type " D" (Services). At the moment that I indicate that value in the field " Item category in purchasing document" , the field " Account assignment category" he becomes gray, preventing that can be modified later. What could do so that this field is modifiable in the future?
Thank you!!

hi
1. Go to Tcode- OMH4,
Maintain Acct assignment as "Possible" instead of not possible for Item Category "D"
2.Go to Tcode - OMG0
Here maintain Various Combinations of Item Category "D" and Account assignment Categories.
Then, Acct Assignment Category field in PO item overview will be open for Item Category "D".
Hope it helps,
Regards,
Rahul
Edited by: RahulNsk on Jun 5, 2009 2:03 PM

Problem with memory settings

Hello,
i got a brand new PC4000 PRO from corsair and i got problem setting timings with this motherboard (neo2 PFISR - bios v3.9).
I can't set CAS timing nor to 3 neither to 2, it automatically turns it back to 2.5.
It seems that there is a lot of users having the same issues with this motherboard all over the net, but they told me to post here.
Has anybody an idea why this happen and how i can fix it ?
Thanks,
Fab

Hi there,
For some reason the BIOS settings have a rather confusion relation.
This is what my experiences have been, please try them and report your findings:
- MAT is enabled (and overrules SPD or manual memory timings) if:
Memory clock is set to "auto" within the frequency menu AND you set your perfomance above FAST.
To get a stable system, I'd advice the following:
- Go back to default BIOS settings.
- Disable D.O.T.
- Disable Spread Spectrum
- Fix your memory frequency to what it should be (e.g. 400Mhz), and not AUTO.
- Choose SPD timings for your memory (or set them below SPD timing manually).
- Start with performance settings to SLOW.
Check memory timing settings (chipset) with AIDA or CPU-z.
Check stability with Prime95 & torture test on maximum RAM.
Once the system is table, try upping the speed setting, check the actual timings and see what happens. If you still have problems, take out one memory stick and try with just one (maybe one is faulty).
Once you got it stable, continue from here.
Keep in mind: in my experience, if you set your memory frequency at a fixed frequency and use SPD settings, you will find that upping the performance settings, changes the memory timings! However as long as the frequency is not AUTO, MAT is not enabled, whatever the performance setting.
It really confused me at first, as I could not get the system running with MAT enabled, whatever memory time I entered. But with fix memory frequency, I got the system stable with 2,2,2,5 timing!
If anyone has techdoc on these matters, I'd appreciate an URL.
Bios 2.3 on 865PE neo2-LS
Twin Kingston ValueRam Cl2.5 (winbond)

Problem with Global settings panels

Using Flash player v10,1,53,64. with IE7 and Safari 5. I am trying to turn off the auto update notification as I work in an infant school and the pop-up notifications confuse the children.
Flash objects are working fine and the http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ page tells me that I have the version of Flash installed with no problem.
I then right click on an active Flash object on a web page and choose "Global settings..."
Then choose Global Notification Settings Panel... , which takes me to http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager05.htm l
At this point, instead of the panel I get the "This content requires Flash" replacement item - so I can't go any further. The same sthing happens with any of the Settings panels.
So one page on the Adobe site says I have the player installed, others don't.
Help much appreciated.

pwillener wrote:
Does that happen on all browsers?
Anyway, another way of disabling update notifications is by using a mms.cfg file; see http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/167/16701594.html for details.
It has happened with all the browsers I have checked, some may be a bit out of date as we don't use them regularly but I have the problem with
Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13
Safari 5.0
Firefox 3.0.19
Chrome 5.0.375.86
I'll have a look at the mms.cfg option this afternoon.
I'm beginning to wonder whether this is caused by a firewall problem. I don't control the firewall settings. I've been assured by our network team that there is no block, but I'm wondering if that is right. I suppose they could have a block on flash content from not specifically authorised sites (which might well include Adobe) that would still let the Adobe site interrogate to find out the Flash version - but as I'm not 100% certain how the protocols work I can't be sure, I'll have to recheck that one.
Thanks for the help so far.

Cproject problems with accounting settings

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for