Flash Builder 4 beta 2, Managed objects and IUID

Hey Everyone,
I just installed Flash Builder 4 beta 2, I am getting compiler errors now on my managed data service classes that implement IUID:
[Managed]
public class Foo implements IUID {
private var uid:String;
public function set uid(value:String):void {
this.uid=value;
The compile error is on the above setter and says: [Managed] requires 'uid' to be of type 'String' , not sure what I am doing wrong here, and this was working on beta 1, any ideas?
Thanks.

Did you try a full clean and build? Also try a new test app to reduce the number of possibilities.
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Developer
Adobe Systems Inc.
Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Similar Messages

Nightly SDK and Flash Builder Beta

I am using Flash Builder Beta and have tried different nightly builds (ie. 4.0.0.9437, 4.0.0.9417, 4.0.0.9188) and have the same issue - when going into Design View I receive several warnings:
Design View could not load fiber_rb.swc. It may be incompatible with this SDK, or invalid. (DesignSWFLoader.ERROR_LOAD_VERIFY).
The same error for: fiber.swc, serializers_rb.swc and sparks.swc.
Does anybody have a fix besides two workspaces with diff. sdks?
There have been some other discussions in regards to this but with no fix.
First ... Adobe talks of using nightly builds with instructions.
Second ... when users have problems such as above a standard reply is "this has been fixed in an internal build". How does that help us?
Third ... in Flex Bug and Issue Management System this was a reply -
Heidi Williams - [08/04/09 05:40 PM ]
I don't think we want to spend time on encouraging users to use newer SDKs with DV of Beta 1. There are probably lots of things that won't work so they should either just get on prerelease or wait for the next Beta.
Fourth ... prerelease is not open any more and I for one am unfortunately not on it. FWIW - I do own a Flex Builder 3 license.
I understand Flash Builder is a Beta program, but why talk of nightly sdk releases and using Flash Builder if there are issues and unavailable internal builds. And if Adobe is working on bug fixes, along with changes such as the Rename List, why not give users access to those internal builds? At least licensed users. Let everyone keep up to date!

Hi,
Form early in the piece it was acknowledged that nightly builds would not work corrrectly with design view. As there will be a second beta in a matter of days now It would be best to wait for that. The builds from the pre-release program have shown a great amount of improvements across the board so I am sure the end of August(hopefully) beta release will be pretty good and make a lot of people happy.
I use locally compiled sdks that I update every night and things are working reasonably well. So just hold on for a little longer and enjoy the second beta release when it arrives.
David.

Can't Uninstall Flash Builder Beta 1

Hi,
I installed Flash Builder Beta 1 a few months ago and now I can't seem to uninstall it. Everytime I run the uninstall script, Uninstall Adobe Flash Builder Beta, it begins, prompts me for my admin password, starts loading the Flash Builder app screen, but then the uninstaller exits without removing the application. Is there some step that I'm missing or an alternative way to remove the application? The trial has expired and is pretty much useless with Beta 2 out. Any help regarding this matter would be very much appreciated
Thanks in advance,
Randy

If you are using Windows you should be able to have the option of uninstalling it from the following: Start>Control Panel>Programs and Features window, instead of the uninstall executable.

Attempting to use flash builder beta 2 with beta 1 sdk

Hi,
I'm running into a few issues migrating a project I've started in Flash Builder Beta 1.
The biggest mistake I probably made was uninstalling Beta 1 and I can't seem to find where to re-download it. Is it available somewhere?
It would not be necessary except for the fact that I'm catching errors trying to use Flash Builder Beta 2 with the 4.0.0.7219 sdk.
When I set my compiler to use the beta 1 sdk, Flash Builder first throws an internal build error. Then I can't return to properties > flex compiler, getting a "could not accept changes error." Below is the log output.
I plan to migrate my project to Beta 2, but would love to do it in a separate workspace...
Any help, suggestions much appreciated!
Seth
Here's what's in my log:
!ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2009-10-07 10:15:14.268
!MESSAGE Unhandled event loop exception
!STACK 0
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: flex2/tools/oem/OEMException$CircularLibraryDependencyException
    at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0(Native Method)
    at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:2357)
    at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0(Class.java:2671)
    at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:321)
    at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:303)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.sdks.FlexSDK.createSDKDependentImplementation(FlexSDK.java: 846)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.sdks.FlexSDK.createSDKDependentImplementation(FlexSDK.java: 831)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.actionscript.internal.ActionScriptProjectSettings.computeCo mpilerLibraryPath(ActionScriptProjectSettings.java:1249)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.multisdk.compiler.internal.ASBuilder.applySettings(ASBuilder.java:3 20)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.multisdk.compiler.internal.ASApplicationBuilder.setup(ASApplication Builder.java:67)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.multisdk.compiler.internal.ASItemBuilder.setup(ASItemBuilder.java:5 4)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.compiler.BuilderFactory.createBuilder(BuilderFactory.java:8 0)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.compiler.BuilderFactory.createCompilerArgumentValidator(Bui lderFactory.java:64)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage.validateCompilerArgument s(CompilerPropertyPage.java:792)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage.validate(CompilerPropert yPage.java:929)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage.access$4(CompilerPropert yPage.java:921)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage$4.modifyText(CompilerPro pertyPage.java:674)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:167)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:84)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1561)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1585)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1566)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Text.sendModifyEvent(Text.java:1769)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Text.setText(Text.java:2230)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage.copyVersionIntoEditBoxes (CompilerPropertyPage.java:693)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage.updateFlashPlayerOptions (CompilerPropertyPage.java:652)
    at com.adobe.flexbuilder.project.ui.properties.CompilerPropertyPage.update(CompilerPropertyP age.java:910)
    at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(Observable.java:142)
    at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(Observable.java:98)
    at com.adobe.flexide.editorcore.ui.sdks.FlexSDKChooserControl$2.widgetSelected(FlexSDKChoose rControl.java:665)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:228)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:84)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1561)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1585)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1570)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.notifyListeners(Widget.java:1360)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Link.sendMouseEvent(Link.java:639)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.sendMouseEvent(Control.java:2978)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.sendTrackEvents(Control.java:3073)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.kEventControlTrack(Control.java:2104)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.controlProc(Widget.java:375)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.controlProc(Display.java:862)
    at org.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.OS.SendEventToEventTarget(Native Method)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3051)
    at org.eclipse.jface.window.Window.runEventLoop(Window.java:825)
    at org.eclipse.jface.window.Window.open(Window.java:801)
    at org.eclipse.ui.dialogs.PropertyDialogAction.run(PropertyDialogAction.java:157)
    at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:498)
    at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.handleWidgetSelection(ActionContributionI tem.java:583)
    at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.access$2(ActionContributionItem.java:500)
    at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem$5.handleEvent(ActionContributionItem.java :411)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:84)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1561)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1585)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1570)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.notifyListeners(Widget.java:1360)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3482)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3068)
    at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2384)
    at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2348)
    at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2200)
    at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$5.run(Workbench.java:495)
    at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:288)
    at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:490)
    at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149)
    at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:113)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:193)
    at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLau ncher.java:110)
    at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.jav a:79)
    at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:386)
    at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:179)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:549)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:504)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1236)

Hello,
I reproduced your issue exactly as you stated. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like FB Beta 1 is publicly available. To get out of the broken state, you can go to your workspace preferences (not project properties) and under Flash Builder > Installed Flex SDKS, switch back to the 4.0 Beta 2 SDK that came with Builder.
I am going to ask around to see what the problem might be, as I am unfamiliar with the code that is causing this. There may or may not be a workaround, but regardless, I think we'd recommend that you upgrade your project from Beta 1 SDK to Beta 2.
Thanks,
Rob Brambley
Computer Scientist, Flash Builder

Workaround for using the latest nightly SDK 4.0 builds with Flash Builder Beta 2

The latest builds of SDK 4.0 have been updated in preparation for including playerglobal.swc for Flash Player 10.1. Flash Builder Beta 2 can not find playerglobal.swc due to the addition of the {targetPlayerMinorVersion} variable found in the flex-config.xml file.
When using recent nightly SDKs with Flash Builder Beta 2, please modify them as follows:
1) Rename the folder <nightly sdk location>/frameworks/libs/player/10.0 to "10"
2) Edit the file <nightly sdk location>/frameworks/flex-config.xml and remove ".{targetPlayerMinorVersion}" and save
When you restart Flash Builder, we will now find a correct location for playerglobal.swc, allowing for code hints and many other features to work properly.
Jason San Jose
Quality Engineer, Flash Builder

Bump.
As people continue to have problems with the nightly SDK 4 builds and Flash Builder Beta 2, please remember to use the workaround described at the top of this thread. Also see http://blogs.adobe.com/jasonsj/2010/02/workaround_for_using_the_latest_nightly_sdk_40_buil ds_with_flash_builder_beta_2.html.
Jason San Jose
Quality Engineer, Flash Builder

Flash Builder 4.5 for PHP and ANT

I just installed Flash Builder 4.5 for PHP Premium and I am trying to install ANT so I can automate the AsDoc generation process.
In the past (Flash Builder 4), I just point to "http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo/" and select "Eclipse Java Development Tools".
However, when I do the same in " Flash Builder 4.5 for PHP Premium", I got an error message saying that a newer version of "Eclipse Java Development Tools" has already been installed. I go to the "Already Installed Software" tab, and indeed I see "Eclipse Java Development Tools" under "Eclipse Java IDE", but ANT is nowhere to be found.
By the way, I am doing everything on the stock, standalone Flash Builder 4.5 for PHP Premium.
Any suggestion is much appreciated.

I also have Flash Builder 4.5 for PHP and the ANT view does not show when going to Window -> Show View --> Other. I could not find it in any of the folders.
However, I was able to add it by hitting Command 3 (CTRL 3 on PC) and typing Ant.

How to download Flash Builder beta on a bad connection?

I'm on a slow, unstable connection and 1gb is pretty hard to get without stalling and resuming multiple times, but resuming doesn't seem to work in labs for some reason - maybe my session times out? I usually use Free Download Manager to handle big files like this, but the security on labs downloads prevents me from using a download helper. Other Adobe software has a nice download program, but not the betas.
I'm specifically trying to get the Windows 64 bit Flash Builder with monacle for game development. I can't find a torrent for it (torrents also work beautifully on my crappy connection). I guess this is more a suggestion to Adobe labs - please put aside your security concerns and make it easier for us to download these huge files!

I use free manager download, but the link provided for flashbuilder does not work with it. I used "DownThemAll" plugin for firefox, it downloaded 75% but now the link to the flashbuilder 4.7 game edition (since 8th oct.2012) does not work at all for 2 days in a row, so I can't download it anyway.

How to solve the flash Builder 4.6 scroll view and textinput display problem?

I have a dynamic form application which worked well on flash builder 4.5, having display problems in flash builder 4.6 now. What I did is adding
TextInput objects to a scroll view and set the texts for them dynamically. Everything is fine after the screen loaded. But if I scroll down, sometimes the texts will be placed in wrong positions. I attached the screen copy of the wrong display. Does anybody know how to solve this problem? Thanks.

Check out the two threads below (if you have not already). I have not tried it but aeonus describes an approach that made me think of something that might work ... It is a workaround but, what if you have a text field (txtA) with the skin that does not allow soft keyboard selection, but does scroll correctly, and on the onClick event of that text field, you dynamically cover it with another text field (txtB) that does allow soft keyboard selection, (but does not scroll properly) and trigger the keyboard. After you get the entry from the user, set the value of txtA and destroy txtB ... leaving you (theoretically) with properly scrolling text fields. If you have a lot of those in your app, you might want to write a component that implements that behavior.
"Create a dynamic textfield, and on click, invoke create a StageText instance at the same location as the textfield (by setting the StageText.viewPort property)
Finally, set StageText.softKeyboardType to "numeric" and call StageText.assignFocus();"
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/915019?tstart=0
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/911214?tstart=0

Flash Builder Beta 2 locale en_GB problems ?

Hi
I have installed FB B2 and created a project but the application produces an error even before I've complied the app, the message is as follows
unable to open 'C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder Plug-in Beta 2\sdks\4.0.0\frameworks\locale\en_GB'
I can change the locale under Flex Complier to en_US and this sorts this error. But then the following error appears:
unable to open 'C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder Plug-in Beta 2\eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.flexbuilder.dcrad.nl1_4.0.0.253292\nl\en_GB\dcradSwcs\4.0\loc ale'
I have no idea what to do now, why has the en_GB locale been removed in FB B2 ??
Any help would be greatfully accepted
PS I have tried build 10485 of the SDK and get the same result.
Regards
Chris

Hi Chris,
Yes, it was a type. I meant the locale that FB uses as default on my PC: es_ES.
The steps to reproduce this ( using FB beta2 + LCDS3_beta3.war )
1) New Flex project "foobar" with J2EE server
2) Use tomcat 6.0.18 and lcds3_beta3.war
3) Finish
4) I add the project to my Tomcat instance
5) Build project and "boom":
Description Resource Path Location Type
unable to open W:\PATH_TO_WS\foobar\WebContent\WEB-INF\flex\locale\es_ES
Then, I go to my FB_beta2 installation and :
6) copylocale en_US es_ES
Then I copy the new brand es_ES locale into W:\PATH_TO_WS\foobar\WebContent\WEB-INF\flex\locale and I try to build the project again:
7) Build the project
I get something like :
Description Resource Path Location Type
unable to open 'C:\Archivos de programa\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder Plug-in Beta
2\eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.flexbuilder.dcrad.nl1_4.0.0.253292\nl\es_ES\dcradSwcs\4.0\loca le' foobar Unknown Flex Problem
I get the feeling there is something that is breaking the project at the point Im adding the project to the Tomcat instance.
If you skip step 4) The project compiles successfully. As soon as you add the project to Tomcat, everything breaks.
What do you think?
A.

Flash Builder, Flex SDK 4.1 and OSMF versions

Hi,
I use Flash Builder (4.5) and have to use the 4.1 Flex SDK to make AIR apps for TV sets. The OSMF lib provided in the 4.1 SDK doesnt meet my needs, but the 4.5 version does. However, when I add another OSMF.swc version to my libraries, I get a Conflict error and cannot compile the app. If to prevent conflicts I remove the native OSMF.swf (Properties -> Flex Buid Path -> Remove) then Flash Builder signals an error (red cross aside the project in the project explorer), but won't say where it is. Of course it will not compile either.
Any idea ?

If I had to summarize my problem in ten words :
With Flex 4.5 SDK and AIR 2.6 SDK I can stream dynamic http in the VideoPlayer element, but it won't play on a Samsung TV.
With Flex 4.1 SDK and AIR 2.6 SDK I can launch the app on a Samsung TV, but the VideoPlayer element won't play any dynamic http stream.
I assume this problem comes from OSMF because it is the library supposedly handling the dynamic streaming. I just can't make it work within Flex 4.1 :
If I delete the native osmf.swc and remove it from the Flex Build Path properties, Flash Builder won't compile, claiming there is an error, even if I add other more recent osmf.swc.
If I don't delete it and still add another one, either I get a conflict error or a "not found" error. either way it won't compile.

Difference bet ween Fleet Object and Production Resource Tools

Hi all,
Please give me the difference between Fleet Object and Production Resource Tools in Plant Maintenance
Thanks in Advance
Thanks,
shriraam

Dear,
Production Resources/Tools (PRT)
Unlike machines and fixed assets, production resources and tools (PRTs) are movable (not stationary) operating resources that are required to perform an activity and can be used repeatedly. For example, PRTs include documents, engineering drawings, jigs and fixtures, and measurement instruments.
Fleet Management
Here can map the vehicles as equipment master records and enter vehicle-specific additional data, which is displayed in the system on two additional tab pages. This means that you can now specify important fleet data such as the license plate number, load volume, consumption data, fuel card number, engine data, or fuel type and so on directly in the equipment master record.
You can also perform maintenance planning for a fleet object. You can make the date of the next scheduled service dependent on the distance
Please refer this link,
[Link|http://www.nd-solutions.com/pdfs/white_EAM/EAM_ConfiguringFleetMgt.pdf]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Difference between flash builder beta and flash builder beta 2 webservice.

hey guys... got a quick weird question, im using a lot of webservices, and i immidiately noticed the new thing in the interospection wizard, there is a new field in the wizard called "Data type package", i was wondering what that field is exactly??
i never noticed anything like that in the previous versions of flex,
from my understanding it just sticks all the main components under "valueObjects"
Thanks in Advance

so let's say you have some php service and it returns a collection of objects through amf.
for example your php has something like:
$array = new array();
$car1 = new car();
$car1->year = 2009;
$car1->model = 'ford';
$car1 = new car();
$car1->year = 2005;
$car1->model = 'audi';
$array[] = $car1;
$array[] = $car2;
return $array;
well, when FB receives this data (when your return the config type) it will recognize that you're returning a collection of objects, specifically a collection of car objects that contain two properties (year:int and model:String).
FB will offer to generate the Flex car class for you and you can store this autogenerated class in your valueObject folder (or whatever folder you want).
does that answer your q??
- e

Flex and Flash Builder Beta Feedback Survey

Hey guys,
Please take 15 minutes to give feedback on the beta releases here. Your input is greatly appreciated. Please also pass this along to other individuals who might be using the betas.
Kind regards,
Vera

Hi Glenn,
I updated the link yesterday afternoon, but for some folks it seems to still be going to the old survey. I'll put a redirect on the old survey, but please try going to the survey here.
Vera

Director Flash 8 xtra breaks shared object and onSync

This one has driven me insane for days, but at least now I
know what the problem is. It's really a Director-Flash8 xtra-FMS
problem, but I figure the best chance for a solution is posting it
here.
The problem is this: The Director Flash 8 xtra update messes
up remote shared object connections to FMS applications. The
Management Console debugger does not show any SO properties ("no
data"), and only the "clear" onSync event fires. The old Flash 7
xtra worked/works fine. To illustrate, I've tested the following
code in the Director message window with both the v8 and v7 xtra
(if you know Actionscript and not Lingo, it's still easy to figure
out what happens here). It basically creates and connects a remote
shared object on FMS:
rrr = newObject("SharedObject")
nnn = newObject("NetConnection")
sss = "rtmp:/apptest01" -- app on locally running FMS
er = nnn.connect(sss)
put er
-- 1
fff = rrr.getRemote("tester", nnn.uri, true)
put fff
-- <flash object>
er = fff.connect(nnn)
put er
--1
-- so it's all good until here. onSync callback works with
"clear", etc, but...
fff.data.foo = 55.5
put fff.data.foo
-- 55.5... but only shows in Mgmt Console when using the v7
xtra...
-- when using the old flash7 xtra,
-- debugging the FMS app and onSync events works correctly,
-- but when using flash8 xtra,
-- debugging the FMS app shows "no data" for this shared
object. foo = 55.5 should be there.
-- also, onSync events no longer fire after the initial
"clear".
If I translated this into actionscript and ran it in Flash 8
vs Flash 7, etc, would I get the same problem? I'll try that next,
but it took me a while to get this far. Is it simply a matter of
permission or firewall setting? Or is it something just broken with
the Director flash 8 xtra?
Thanks

As of just last week, Adobe can replicate the problem and is
"working on it". I don't anticipate a shockwave-flash-xtra update
to come out of this, but perhaps they can identify some other
work-around. If you can avoid using "success" onSync events and
don't need shared object debugging, then FMS works with
Director/Flash 8 xtra... but this may be a symptom of yet more bugs
that I haven't seen.
I'm stopping development on my FMS/Director project until
this is resolved... I may need to crack open the old Multi User
xtra.

Flash Builder Beta 2 won't install

Hey, the installer is saying that "the version of this file is not compatible with the version of windows you're running". I'm running windows vista 64 bit, but have installed plenty of 32 bit apps just fine. I was able to install beta 1 just fine. I started the install process for beta 1 again, and it seems to start OK (though I don't want to continue and run the install of beta 1 over my current install).
Did the labs team overlook something in the installer in this round? Any workarounds I can use?
thanks

Yes i understand it might conflict, however, it did not conflict with beta 1. Do you or anyone else know if they did something in beta 2 that conflicts with cfEclipse? I'd hate to uninstall cfEclipse, install cfBuilder beta 2, and it still not work.
If nobody has any other ideas, i'll try this approach...then come January, i'll probably have to install cfEclipse back till we get the full blown cfBuilder.
thanks for the help
dan

Flash Builder 4 beta 2, Managed objects and IUID

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for