IP Failover between nic cards, not servers

This maybe a very simple question, I just haven't found the answer to it...
Our Xserve's are running on a Cisco switch and a switch port for the primary NIC card of one AFP server recently failed.
While the server had both cards connected to the switch and the second NIC card was live, the users lost connectivity to the internal server address (internal DNS) as is was pointing only to the primary IP address of that server.
This makes sense as there was no mechanism to tell the server to start using the secondary IP address.
We are now planning to connect all secondary NIC's to a second switch for both the LAN and the DMZ (VLANs) for better redundancy.
The DMZ uses IP addresses only due to port forwarding.
My question is now what is the best way to continue services on a secondary NIC if the first NIC fails.
Add a new DNS entry for the LAN? If so, how? Just enter the secondary NIC IP with the same server name?
Use FAILOVERBCASTIPS for the DMZ?
IP Failover works great between machines, but can the server send heartbeat messages to itself (example: FAILOVERBCASTIPS="NIC1-IP NIC2-IP")?
Is there any way to maintain the mount status of AFP volumes during the switch of IP's (since it's still the same machine)?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Xserve G5 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Since you're using Cisco switches and are already familiar with VLANs, your simplest solution would be to use link aggregation to create a trunk between the Mac and the switch using both the NICs, then configure VLANs so that both subnets use the trunk interface rather than the physical interfaces.
That way traffic for either IP address can traverse either NIC, and you get automatic failover (thanks to link aggregation) should either NIC fail.
Note that this will only work if you're connecting to the same switch. If you have 'internal' and 'external' switches this won't work without some re-architecting of the network topology.

Similar Messages

New Wifi NIC card not supported

So I have a DV4 4141us and I wanted to upgrade the wifi card to something that supports AC. So I bought an Intel AC wifi card that people said gave them good speeds. It was cheap and that makes me happy. I go to install it and Im getting an error 702. Im thinking maybe a BIOS update will help me out but all the changelog says about that is better memory management. Im wanting to know if there is a way I can install this bad boy wifi card. I would really hate to think Im screwed out of 802.11AC support. The model of the NIC is 7260HMW. Thanks.

Some people have had success with that module on some notebooks and many have not.
Did you install the driver from Intel?
Check the BIOS mod websites. You may be able to get a modified BIOS that suports the WIFIO module if you are willing to forgo your notebook's warranty to try to use the WIFI module.
Don't forget that once you go down the modified BIOS route you are on your own. You will have accepted complete responsibility for possibly making a brick out of your notebook by installing and using modified firmware.
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

Server 10.3.9 - Three NIC cards - Route between Three subnets

I have a panther server with three nic cards, each one connected to a different network.
xx.xx.1.x = private intranet used for storing video files- Has a DHCP server
xx.xx.2.x = company intranet used for internet access-
xx.xx.3.x = editors intranet
I have a NAT set up to forward network activity from the .3 to the .2
But the editors (.3) also need to access .1.
Is there a way to connect the .3 to the .1 network through the server?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Here's a picture to show what I'm trying to say.
http://www.kbdiondemand.org/client_files/routing.png

Here is my newest routing table. I cleared everything out and started over.
I have NAT enabled and it is working, but I removed the private address.
http://www.kbdiondemand.org/client_files/routing3.png
I'm starting to wonder if I need to create a divert rule in the firewall. NAT has a firewall divert rule to send traffic to the NAT service.
So far, I haven't gotten the syntaxt correct for creating the divert rule. The error message is the port is incorrect?
I haven't found the information on any of the panther server books out there. They shy away from using the server as a firewall or a router.
excerpt from Essential Mac OS X Panther Server Administration
Of all the things that a packet filter can do, Apple seems to have some pretty specific things in mind for the Firewall service in Mac OS X Server. Panther Server's Firewall service is targeted at protecting the server on which it is running. Configuring a firewall for this purpose is very different from configuring a firewall designed to sit at the border between a network and the Internet. Mac OS X Server is simply not well-suited for the tasks normally performed by a dedicated firewall.
For example, Mac OS X Server needs to be rebooted for things like software updates, and does a fairly poor job of routing packets during the reboot. Surely you could configure Mac OS X Server as a router and then never touch it so that it wouldn't have to be rebooted, but that means no software updates. Just because Mac OS X Server can act as a router; that does not mean it's the most cost-effective or functional solution. Trying to shoehorn Apple's Firewall service into performing duties that it wasn't intended to provide is generally not a good idea.
Apple also includes a Network Address Translation (NAT) service that works in conjunction with the firewall. This service could be used to provide Internet access to a workgroup by allowing the workstations to share the server's IP address. While the NAT service does work, better results may be found with the average $40 NAT router. The bottom line is that it's a very good idea to use dedicated network hardware, and not a personal computer, to perform critical network functions like routing. This reduces network downtime due to computer maintenance such as software updates.
I will focus on using Apple's Firewall service for protection of services running on our server, and not to do routing or NAT for other computers.

Do I need (or do I even have) a NIC card? Modem works, comp not responding

Hi All,
Recently we have been experiencing connection problems with our cable modem and Mac. We've had our cable company out several times and I finally believe they have resolved any problems on their end.
Currently all of the cable modem lights are on (normally indicating we should be able to connect) and we are still not connecting. During a phone call to one of our cable techs he asked me to pull up System Preferences and click on Network. Upon doing this I then,under the "Show" drop down menu chose "Network Status". He and I were both surprized that the only thing that showed up in the dialog box was Internal Modem. There was no "Built in Ethernet" which is how our modem is connected to our Mac. He said that Built in Eternet should be there and that I need to get a new NIC (Network Interface Card) to resolve the problem so that the computer can communicate with the modem. Makes sense to me.
My question is this: Is there such a card for a Mac or was he referring to a PC type of card that performs that function. From my converstion with him he is obviously somewhat conversant with Macs (or had good scripts,prompts to read from) so I left our conversation thinking he knew what he was talking about. Is this a piece of hardware or software? I got the impression from him it was a piece of software that needed to be reinstalled. Lastly,where would I obtain the software/hardware?
Sorry about the long post. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Vance
G4 400 mghz processor Mac OS X (10.3.9) 512 ram
G4 400 mghz processor Mac OS X (10.3.9) 512 ram

Both of the G4 Macs you mentioned have built-in Ethernet on the motherboard. They would not require a PCI card to support this function unless the built-in Ethernet hardware on the motherboard were defective (this does not happen often), or you wanted to run much faster than the speed provided by the built-in Ethernet (not generally needed unless you are using a File Server at your location).
You already have a top-notch Apple brand Ethernet interface. Do not let your ISP talk you into installing a different PCI-slot NIC card unless you are certain the motherboard Ethernet is defective.

NIC card on HCL list, but it's not talking. Why?

Hi, I just finished installing Solaris 10 (11/06) onto my computer. The whole installation installed without errors. Afterwards, I went to the log files and saw that everything seems to have installed OK.
After rebooting, I logged in with the CDE environment. Everything appears normal. I editted my /etc/hosts file accordingly. I hooked up this new Solaris x86 system onto my network. The NIC card is not talking. I can't ping from this new Solaris x86 PC to another system on the existing, working network.
My NIC card is the D-Link DFE-530TX+
This card is on the approved hardward compatibility list.
I have installed Solaris x86 in the past on many PC's without running into this type of problem, until now. Anyone knows what could be causing this problem, or how to know that my NIC card is being recognized by the Solaris x86 system, and how I can make this thing work?
Do you think I need to install additional drivers to make this particular D-Link NIC card work? If so, how do I install it? Thanks in advance.

Is there a NIC that is widely being sold in stores now that will work without needing to install drivers? It would be much easier for me just to go out to the stores and pick up a new NIC.
I live in Silicon Valley, so I can go to stores like Fry's Electronics, Best Buy, MicroCenter, etc.
Also, I already tried using Intel PRO/100 S and the 3COM Etherlink 10/100 PCI (3C905C-TXM). I downloaded a software from SUN, made a bootable CD, and when it scanned my PC, it says that likely my hardware will be compatible with Solaris 10. Yet,
At the beginning of the installing, I see messages like:
Using RPC Bootparams for network configuraton information.
Attempting to configure interface elx10 (or ipbr0)
Skipped interface elx10 (or ipbr0)
Does this mean the NIC won't work?

Second NIC card (eth1) not recognized

Hello,
I have two NIC cards setup. Linux is recognizing only one nic card as eth0 but not recognzing the second one. Any help is greatly appreciated. I am using Redhat Linux Enterprise ES 3.0
Thank you in advance

Thank you and here is the output:
lsmod:
Module Size Used by Not tainted
parport_pc 19076 1 (autoclean)
lp 9028 0 (autoclean)
parport 37088 1 (autoclean) [parport_pc lp]
autofs 13364 0 (autoclean) (unused)
tulip 43584 1
crc32 3712 0 [tulip]
sg 36940 0 (autoclean)
sr_mod 18104 0 (autoclean)
floppy 58160 0 (autoclean)
microcode 4724 0 (autoclean)
ide-scsi 12208 0
ide-cd 35680 0
cdrom 33696 0 [sr_mod ide-cd]
keybdev 2976 0 (unused)
mousedev 5524 1
hid 22212 0 (unused)
input 5888 0 [keybdev mousedev hid]
ehci-hcd 20104 0 (unused)
usb-uhci 26412 0 (unused)
usbcore 79392 1 [hid ehci-hcd usb-uhci]
ext3 91592 2
jbd 52336 2 [ext3]
ata_piix 4100 3
libata 27780 0 [ata_piix]
sd_mod 13744 6
scsi_mod 108840 5 [sg sr_mod ide-scsi ata_piix libata sd_mod]
lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2580 (rev 04)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2581 (rev 04)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2660 (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2658 (rev 03)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2659 (rev 03)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 265a (rev 03)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 265b (rev 03)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 265c (rev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev d3)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2640 (rev 03)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 266f (rev 03)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2651 (rev 03)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 266a (rev 03)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5b60
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5b70
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys Network Everywhere Fast Ethernet 10/100 model NC100 (rev 11)
03:01.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 46)
03:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1064 (rev 03)

How to set up set which NIC card to use for multicast?..

 I just downloaded Rolling Patch 1 for WLS6.0SP2.
 While reading the README file it says
 " ISSUE 42518: Provided a way to set which NIC card to use for multicast traffic
 Can anyone tell me how to set this?. on my WebApplication server it has two NIC
 cards and I want to use the NICcard which is being used to talk to internal network
 for multicast messages.
 One more thing,
 Can anyone one tell how to search for bugs (ISSUES) in weblogic. I am looking
 place where I enter ISSUE number and should get the detailed description of bug/issue
 etc..
 Thanks for helping,
 Nilesh


 Thanks Kumar, I'll try this.
 Does this -Dweblogic.interfaceAddress used only for multicast. Or this is also
 used to talk to AdminServer?.
 The other problem I am facing is when I restart the AdminServer in recovery mode
 it's not finding my WebApp servers, because my webapp servers are on public network
 and my admin (management) server is on private network.
 please look at http://newsgroups.bea.com/cgi-bin/dnewsweb?cmd=article&group=weblogic.developer.interest.management&item=1217&utag=
 , for more details about my problem.
 Thanks,
 Nilesh
 Kumar Allamraju <[email protected]> wrote:
 ><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
 ><html>
 >You should be able to do it via console in 6.1
 > Not sure if it was added in 6.0
 >For 6.0 you can set this via command line
 > java -Dweblogic.interfaceAddress=<addr>
 >You need 6.0 SP2 RP1
 >--
 > Kumar
 >Nilesh Shah wrote:
 ><blockquote TYPE=CITE>I just downloaded Rolling Patch 1 for WLS6.0SP2.
 > While reading the README file it says
 > " ISSUE 42518: Provided a way to set which NIC card to use for multicast
 >traffic
 > "..
 >Can anyone tell me how to set this?. on my WebApplication server it
 >has two NIC
 > cards and I want to use the NICcard which is being used to talk to
 >internal network
 > for multicast messages.
 >One more thing,
 >Can anyone one tell how to search for bugs (ISSUES) in weblogic. I
 >am
 >looking
 > place where I enter ISSUE number and should get the detailed description
 >of bug/issue
 > etc..
 >Thanks for helping,
 >Nilesh</blockquote>
 ></html>
 >

2 NIC Cards in PowerMac G3 Server running OS X Server 10.3?

Hello all,
I have installed a D-Link PCI Network Adapter, Model #DFE-530TX+, into one of my G3 Servers (Blue and White - Yosemitie) running OS X Server 10.3.
I booted and then installed the driver provided on the vendors CD and then rebooted. I get an error at desktop saying that the driver cannot be used because it was installed incorrectly, although I followed D-Links instructions to the T.
I visited D-Links website and there is a different driver available for Mac OS 10.2x. When I install this one, same error.
Apple System Profiler does not show that there is a card installed in the respective PCI slot. I have tried both remaining slots.
Is there something obvious that I'm missing concerning installation of a secondary Ethernet connection in this machine? I have been told that OS X Server 10.3 doesn't need the driver installed at all, it should just pick it up.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
PowerMac G3 Server-Blue-and-White

A tech friend of mine suggested that I run the MacOSXServerEssentials.pkg located on Disc #2 of the OS X Server installation discs. Since the D-Link card functioned under the client version of OS X 10.3.9, if I ran the OS X Server Essentials package and upgraded a client to a server, it should retain the PCI card information. I tried to run the package and was told that I needed to have a minimum of OS X 10.3.9 client installed. I had not installed the Combo Update, therefore, I only had OS X 10.3.2 client installed. Once updated to 10.3.9 client, I ran the OSXServerEssentials package. Once complete it did not ask for a restart and was still booted into the OS X 10.3.9 client version. I did restart and am glad to report that I am now running OS X Server 10.3.9 with two NIC cards on a PowerMac Blue-and-White G3.
Thanks again for your suggestions,
Kyle

Setting Up Dual NIC Cards? Benefit?

Hello Everyone,
I know that the Mac Pro line comes with Dual NICs and I was wondering how do I set these up to be useful with my Cable Modem and Router? Can they be used to get more speed or are they used together in some other capacity.
I really appreciate anyones help and expertise.
Many Thanks,
Chris

The normal use of dual nic interfaces would be to run double instances of a given server on disparate IP numbers. Dual NIC's are generally employed in order to attach multiple IP addresses to a single machine.
Another potential use for dual NIC's is internet connection sharing, where your Mac Pro acts as a kind of router; again also this could be used for attaching one NIC to print services and the other NIC for LAN/WAN access.
OK, actually there are a whole bunch of good reasons for dual NIC cards, but 'doubling your bandwidth' is really not one of them. Believe me, unless you are on a direct fiber OC-10 20 foot from your ISP's NOC, then your existing single NIC has 1000 times the bandwidth of your incoming WAN connection.
It is likely possible to interleave dual NIC cards between two machines for bandwith purposes; but if that were going to be the canse, just identify one as "in" and the other as "out" (both machines would have to have dual NIC's to make this mean anything) but again, I honestly do not see a real world use for this...
Message was edited by: psalmsmith

LYNC EDGE Server NIC Card Setup

Hello Guys,
I need Your help about setting up the NIC on my EDGE server. I already gone through the article about Set Up Network Interfaces for Edge Servers. as I understand there
are 2 NIC required on each EDGE server (1 Internal facing 7 another 1 is External facing). I just wanted to confirm is there any option to do this with only 1 NIC card or can we configure EDGE with 1 NIC only.?
Thanks in Advance.
Rishi Aggarwal
Regards Rishi Aggarwal

Possible? Yes, I do this on occasion against recommendations and best practices for companies who simply can't or won't set up a second DMZ (please don't split the NICs between your internal network and DMZ, it's just bad security). Everything
mostly seems to work just fine. But, recommended and supported? No.
Here's an article from David Paulino who's also been through it:
http://uclobby.com/2014/04/17/lync-edge-server-on-a-single-subnet/
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications

Multicast and Failover Teamed NICs has this issue.

Has anyone seen such a request from a customer although the request has nothing to do with the switches:
Windows 2000 client with two NIC cards in a Teamed configuration has one NIC connected to one CAT 6500 and the other to the another CAT6500. The NICs are configured in Failover Mode and not in Load Balaned Mode. So when one NIC fails the other takes over.
When I pull the cable from one NIC to it's CAT6500, unicast fails over almost immediately to the other NIC connecting to the other CAT 6500 and unicast starts to work. But Multicast will not work over the 2nd NIC until the client sends an IGMP JOIN Message over the 2nd NIC. The way the code is written on clients is that the IGMP Join Messages are only sent by the clients every 120 seconds and this is per the RFC requiremnt for a client to send JOIN every 120 seconds. This is 120 seconds even if the first NIC has failed.
Customers are expecting that the client - on occassions when the NIC fails - should send a JOIN message immediatley so that the 2nd switch IGMP snoops the packet and multicast resumes immediately and not after 6o or 120 seconds.
I am just curious to know if anyone else has recieved this request from other customers. Of course it is nothing to do with switches, but it is to do with Microsoft / NIC Driver / TCP Stack Implementation for Multicast on the Client.
Has anyone seen a code using WMI (Windows Management Interface) being written on the server where a NIC failure event in the Windows Event Logger being used to send a Multicast Join through the 2nd NIC so that the 2nd switch IGMP snoops the Join Request and sends multicast to that switch port.

Sorry - in the previous entry - I meant to say Multicast Report and everywhere I said Multicast Join. So please read JOIN as REPORT.

E1 (ISDN) Failover between 2 E1 ports in same router

I have two Asterisk based VoIP servers and each has an E1 card installed.
One is a primary and the other a secondary (standby).
I am in the UK and have 1 ISDN E1 line from BT giving us our incoming/outgoing calls. At the moment this is hard wired to our primary however if there is a failure with the primary it's a manual shift to the secondary. I would like to automate this.
I have been looking at dedicated E1 failover units but these are either very hard to come by or horrendously expensive
I've therefore just had a thought but would like some clarification from the Cisco forum as to whether this would work or not.
I have a Cisco 2901 with 2 WIC cards giving 4 E1 ports. Is it possible to configure this to act as an E1 failover?
I'm not wanting to convert anything to IP, I want it all done with E1, so for example:
BT Line in goes to WIC port 1
WIC port 2 has primary
WIC port 3 has secondary
Primary and Secondary can both make outgoing via BT line however only port 2 is receiving incoming from BT, however if there is a loss of service on the primary all incoming from BT then routes automatically to WIC port 3
It all sounds plausible to me but as I said I don't want to do any conversion to IP as there is sensitive modem traffic and would like to minimise this as much as possible.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Thanks

Hello,
What you describe is pretty simple to configure from a Cisco point of view.
To do this you would configure two dial peers each of which point to the same destination number bt with different preferences and destination ports. A basic sample configuration is shown below:
dial-peer voice 2 pots
destination pattern 1...
preference 1
voice-port 2
dial-peer voice 3 pots
destination pattern 1...
preference 2
voice-port 3
In the sample config each dial peer points to the destination pattern 1...
The dots are wild cards so the number range would be 1000 to 1999.
Dial peer 2 has the better preference and so will be used if available and will send calls out of port 2.
Dial peer 3 has the worse preference and so will only be used if dial peer 2 is fully utilized and another call arrives (this is not possible in your setup) or if the port used by dial peer 2 is down.
In a real config the port numbers would likely be different and some extra commands would be needed but hopefully this would give you the basics of how this would work.
In this setup the Cisco router itself becomes a single point of failure so I am not sure that it improves things much over just having a single Asterisk server.
I am wondering whether it would be possible to wire both Asterisk servers to the BT PRI circuit and have the interface on the second server shut down.
The second server could then somehow monitor the first server and if it went down it could bring it's own ISDN card up. You could do this with Cisco routers using Embedded Event Manager and I am sure you could do something similar with Linux scripting.
Hope this helps and let us know how you finally solve this issue.
James

How to tell if nic card is working at 100mb or 10mb??

hello,
subject line says it all.
also, what would be best way to migrate to the open workgroup suite from
sbs6.5??
I'm running everything on one server. would like to add the blackberry
server to the new system. need to run citrix as well (only runs on
windows term server), this would be a seperate box.
would be using win2k3 server for citrix/term server on one box and
another box for running win2k3 with mssql 2005.
Thanks,
Oskar

Anders Gustafsson wrote:
> News novell,
>> subject line says it all.
>>
> Monitor, LAN/WAN, Look at the NIC stats. Almost all NIC drivers will
> report true speed/duplex there
>
> - Anders Gustafsson (Sysop)
> The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
>
> Discover the new Novell forums at http://forums.novell.com
>
> Novell does not monitor these forums officially.
> Enhancement requests for all Novell products may be made at
> http://support.novell.com/enhancement
>
I'm getting max of 104KB per second.
This is pretty slow, isn't it? I think the NIC card on this server is
due for an upgrade. I'm looking at the intel pro server nics.
Any other suggestions? I'm looking for a nic card that is on the HCL
for netware 6.5
Thanks,
Oskar

Having 2 NIC Cards

I have installed a second network card in my power G4 and I need to configure this card with a static IP; however, there is no where to do this (or at least I can not find it). I have the on board network card configured and working. Any suggestions?
I know if I was running os 10 then I could use UNIX commands to do this however I can not afford to do this at the present time.
Thanks
Power g4 Mac OS 9.2.x

Hi Manikandan,
You can use two network cards but if you installed B1 when this two network cards has been configured to enable, the B1 application run will have slow performance. So, you must disable one of network cards, restart the B1 server and run the B1 again.
If you need the NIC card that is already disable, you can enable again. It won't give slow performance.
my answer is quoted from SAP note 1135705:
SAP Business One takes too long to log on users
Symptom
SAP Business One client (not installed on the same machine as the
license service) might take several minutes to log you on successfully due to a delay in establishing a connection with the license server.
After logon, SAP Business One functions as expected.
This is due to the fact that the server or PC on which the license server is installed has more than one network card, or there is a dial-up & VPN interface-configured server.
Note: This can happen when you install the license service on a machine with more than one network card ALREADY installed.
Installing additional network cards on a single network card machine with a license service already installed might not produce this issue.
Other terms
SAP Business One, slow, login, log-in, delay, license, server, NIC, VPN, connection.
Reason and Prerequisites
Application error.
Solution
This issue is a candidate to be resolved in a future release.
Until then, you can use one of the following workarounds:
Disable additional network cards in the Network Connections. Also make sure there is no dialup interface or VPN interface set up, and restart the server. Note that you can re-enable the additional network card after the restart. This will resolve the issue until the next restart.
Install the license server on a machine with a single network card.
Disable all network cards, restart the license server and then enable the network cards again.
JimM

Need technically the linkage between Shopping Card and PO (SRM).....

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am using SAP SRM 7.0 and wanted to find out:
1) Technically the linkage between Shopping Card and PO (SRM). (Basically looking for required table names and the fields)
2) Technically the linkage between Shopping Card and Reservation (SRM) . (looking for required table names and the fields)
Thanks....

Hi Siobhan
thanks. but every customer wants to know what happened to his cart if the status is COMPLETED or not. Why SAP missed this small piece of functionality to show COMPLETED status via WEb transaction. I can see only this via REDISTRIBUTION WORKLOAD transcation status. right hand side green tick mark. this green mark totally mislead every body. mixuter of status shows green tick mark (COMPLETED + FOLLOW ON DOCUMENT CREATED etc) in redistribution mark.
Appreciate your reply .
I tell you in detail .
for ex CART went to ERROR IN PROCESS but no where the requestor can see his cart and he got dismayed and admin can see his cart . ok. if i go see in redistribution menu it shows COMPLETED logo. it mislead whole business.
Muthu

IP Failover between nic cards, not servers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for