Issues with Withholding tax on advance paid

Dear Experts
Our client deducts TDS on the Advance amount paid and on posting of Invoices from the Vendors. The documents are posted with withholding Tax types configured for this purpose in F-48 and FB60 respectively. Document splitting has been activated in the system with all required configuration.
The problem arises when we try to clear the advance amount against the Invoice along with the balance payment in F-53 if the invoice has more than one expense line posted to different Cost Centers in FB60. The system gives an error message " Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled ". Please follow the example given below for better understanding.
Advance posting:
vendor a/c....dr (Profit center 3)
To bank Clearing (Profit center 3)
To TDS on payment
Invoice:
Expense ....dr (Cost Center1 / profit Center 1)
Expense ....dr (Cost Center 2 / Profit Center 2)
To vendor a/c
To TDS on Invoice
Up to here the document splitting works fine with Profit Centers and segments getting displayed in all line items in GL view. The issue comes when we select both the documents in F-53 and try to pay out the balance amount.
Please note the issue does not crop up if we do not populate the withholding tax code while posting the advance entry. The system automatically posts to the relevant profit centers and segments in F-53. But this is not the business scenario.
It would be really helpful if somebody can throw some light on the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: sid_das on Dec 14, 2011 11:26 AM

Resolved at our end.

Similar Messages

  • Withholding Tax on Advance paid having issues with Document splitting

    Dear Experts
    Our client deducts TDS on the Advance amount paid and on posting of Invoices from the Vendors. The documents are posted with withholding Tax types configured for these purpose in F-48 and FB60 respectively. Document splitting has been activated in the system with all required configuration.
    The problem arises when we try to clear the advance amount against the Invoice along with the balance payment in F-53 if the invoice has more than one expense line posted to different Cost Centers in FB60. The system gives an error message " Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled ". Please follow the example given below for better understanding.
    Advance posting:
    vendor a/c....dr   (Profit center 3)
    To bank Clearing (Profit center 3)
    To TDS on payment
    Invoice:
    Expense ....dr  (Cost Center1 / profit Center 1)
    Expense ....dr (Cost Center 2 / Profit Center 2)
    To vendor a/c
    To TDS on Invoice
    Up to here the document splitting works fine with Profit Centers and segments getting displayed in all line items in GL view. The issue comes when we select both the documents in F-53 and try to pay out the balance amount.
    Please note the issue does not crop up if we do not populate the withholding tax code while posting the advance entry. The system automatically posts to the relevant profit centers and segments in F-53. But this is not the business scenario.
    Please let me know if somebody can throw some light on the above issue.
    Edited by: sid_das on Dec 12, 2011 5:32 PM

    Resolved at our end by tweaking the splitting rule to match the Business requirement.

  • How to clear line items with withholding tax manually

    hi Experts,
    i posted a vendor invoice with withholding tax and i made payment as well but not through f-58.
    now i wanted to clear these two through f-44 but it gives the message withholding tax information ignored and didnt display the invoice as open item.
    how do i clear both the trasactions
    regards
    suresh

    hi Praisty,
    thanks for the reply
    i have a second opinion on your statement that no matter whatever tcode you use for payment it will clear the open item. Even in F-58, if u make partial payment it will not clear you open item. But i didnt use f-58 as i said earlier.
    i used FBV1 for parking the document through which i entered the payment details...ofcourse it doesnt have the option for clearing the open items, cheque printing and it will not update your cheque register. i posted the parked document through FBV0. for all practical purposes, this is my payment document but it didnt clear my open item, in order to clear it i now used f-44.
    regards
    suresh

  • F110: how to pay an invoice with Withholding Tax and a credit memo?

    Hi All,
    in my SAP I've defined a Withholding Tax type for Payment Posting.
    I've posted a vendor invoice with with Withholding Tax.
    Later I've posted a credit memo with Withholding Tax which must compensate the prevuois invoice.
    When I launch t.code F110, SAP, in the right manner,  proposes to pay the invoice less the amount of the credit memo. 
    But the calculation of the Withholding Tax (that it should post al the payment time) is wrong: SAP proposes to post the amount of the Withholding Tax recorded in the table WITH_ITEM at the moment of the posting of the invoice. Instead, from it, SAP should detract the amount of the Withholding Tax recorded in the table WITH_ITEM at the moment of the posting of the credit memo.
    Why does SAP doesn't consider the amount of the Withholding Tax of the credit memo?
    Could anyone help me?
    Thanks

    Dear Rossi,
    if You defined the WT TYPE at the payment time this means that the WT amount will be calculated at posted during the F110 run as per the invoice as per the credit memo.
    If they are the same amounts and refer to the same wt type and code, when You run F110, they should match even for the WT calculation. It is clear that if You inserted manually the WT base amount or the WT amount into the invoice, the system will not do any automatic calculation but it will use these amounts that can be different from the one auto matically calculated by the system for the credit memo.
    I hope this can help You.
    Mauri

  • OBWW - Define Accounts for With Holding Tax to be paid over

    Hi All
    I am unable to activate Rules and assign accounts in TCode OBWW (Define accounts for with holding tax to be paid over) as the screen is greyed out.
    Please guide me
    Rgds
    KIM Khan

    Hi
    You may in the same screen in another window.
    Regards
    Murad

  • BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for debtor with withholding tax

    Hello,
    I'm using the BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to generate debtor invoices applying withholding tax.
    In order to obtain the withholding tax information, I'm using structure ACCOUNTWT, but when the document FI is generated, it has not line item for withholding tax, and table WITH_ITEM has no values for basis amount and withholding tax import, though the withholding indicator is there.
    With help of a colleague from basis team, I've been debugging the process and all the parameters seem to be OK. So I guess there's something missing that is doing table WITH_ITEM is being informed incorrectly.
    Another point is that I'm not sure if it's necesary to inform component SECTIONCODE (Withholding tax section) in structure BAPIACAR09 (Debtor position), and in this case, which value it expects to be passed.
    Could you, please, help me with this issue? Any idea will be welcome.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Miriam.

    Hi Maurizio,
    Many thanks for your reply!
    I've checked the parameters you said, and they seem not filled. I'm going to ask a basis colleague for analyzing what's missing and doing the corresponding modifications.
    Thank you very much once again
    Regards,
    Miriam.

  • Post document with BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with withholding taxes

    Hi everyone!
    I have to post some documents that I got from an Excel file. At first, they were G/L documents, so I only filled the table parameter ACCOUNTL of BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to set the "account data" (without using ACCOUNTRECEIVABLE, ACCOUNTPAYABLE, ACCOUNTTAX or ACCOUNTWT).
    After a few, another Posting Keys were allowed in the lines of the documents obtained from the excel file, so the documents can be G/L documents, receipts, etc.But, I still put every account data in ACCOUNTGL, and the created documents were right (at least nobody complained about them :P ).
    No, 3 fields have been added in the excel file:
    - QSSHB: Withholding Tax Base Amount
    - QSFBT: Withholding Tax-Exempt Amount (in Document Currency)
    - QSSKZ: Withholding Tax Code
    As I understood, this BAPI is ready to allow withholding taxes, and I suppose I should have to fill this fields that I receive into some tables that are used as parameters in the BAPI. For example,
    ACCOUNTWT-WT_CODE = Withholding Tax Code
    ACCOUNTWT-BAS_AMT_LC = Withholding Tax Base Amount (Local Currency)
    I think I should use this table (I don't know where I could "put" the other one). My question is, can I do that without using tables ACCOUNTRECEIVABLE and ACCOUNTPAYABLE? My feeling is that is not completely right not to use these tables if the documents are vendor or customer documents... If that's possible.. is it right to put the 2 fields that I have used in the last example (*) to fill that? Where I should put the third field??
    I hope I have explained myself clearly, thanks in advance,
    Victor

    Dear Sreeraj,
    The situations would be multiple, but to be precise I'll provide you one scenario where this BAPI would be failing to do the posting. The scenario is like this:
    1. If you consider GL posting using F-02 by changing any of the reference fields XREF1, or XREF2, the BAPI has to consider the varying screens of each of the line items which internally depends on Transaction Variants of different screens of the Document, which the BAPI will fail to do so.
    2. Also, if there is a Taxation to be done for each Item, still it should consider the above scenario and fill the WITH tables accordingly.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    -Wahid Hussain.

  • AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

    Hi Gurus,
    i need your help on below, please advise!!
    i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
    (Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
    if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
    here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
    EG:
    Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
    in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
    tax mode = Include tax
    In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
    why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
    tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
    single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
    tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
    Please Help !!!
    Thanks,
    Satish

    Hi Vineeth,
    This is Kathy from BSI Support.  I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only.  This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade.  This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward.  There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity).  There is information available on our website that explains these changes.  If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
    If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
    Regards,
    BSI Support - Kathy

  • Problem creating A/R Invoice with Withholding tax data via DI-Server

    Hi!
    Using the following SOAP Request to the DI-Server, I wanted to create an A/R Invoice having a withholding tax data but it always respond with an error saying
    Total taxable amount of all rows exceeds the base amount  [INV5.TaxbleAmnt][line: 1]
    SOAP Request:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
    <env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
      <env:Header>
        <SessionID>203A3C01-7808-4638-8322-2307DF3C0F8F</SessionID>
      </env:Header>
      <env:Body>
        <dis:Add xmlns:dis="http://www.sap.com/SBO/DIS">
          <Service>InvoicesService</Service>
          <Document>
            <DocType>dDocument_Items</DocType>
            <HandWritten>tNO</HandWritten>
            <DocDate>2010-02-08</DocDate>
            <DocDueDate>2010-02-08</DocDueDate>
            <TaxDate>2010-02-08</TaxDate>
            <VatDate>2010-02-08</VatDate>
            <CardCode>NPI</CardCode>
            <Comments>test di-server soap message 1</Comments>
            <DocumentLines>
              <DocumentLine>
                <ItemCode>TRC</ItemCode>
                <Quantity>1</Quantity>
                <Price>1000</Price>
                <TaxCode>OVAT</TaxCode>
                <VatGroup>OVAT</VatGroup>
                <TaxLiable>tYES</TaxLiable>
                <WTLiable>tYES</WTLiable>
              </DocumentLine>
            </DocumentLines>
            <WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
              <WithholdingTaxData>
                <WTCode>C140</WTCode>
                <TaxableAmount>1000</TaxableAmount>
                <WTAmount>100</WTAmount>
              </WithholdingTaxData>
            </WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
          </Document>
        </dis:Add>
      </env:Body>
    </env:Envelope>
    OVAT rate above is 10%.
    The withholding tax code C140 is setup as
    rate=10,
    Category=Payment,
    Base Type=Net,
    % Base Amount = 100,
    Rounding Type = Commercial Values.
    We are using the New Zealand/Australia localization in SAP B1 2007A PL49.
    The above code can be successful only if I set the <WithholdingTaxDataCollection> node to:
            <WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
              <WithholdingTaxData>
                <WTCode>C140</WTCode>
                <TaxableAmount>0</TaxableAmount>
                <WTAmount>100</WTAmount>
              </WithholdingTaxData>
            </WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
    setting TaxableAmount equal to 0 which is not desired.
    Can anyone extend me some help, please?
    Thanks.

    Albert,
    Did you try adding this via the DI API and not the DI Server?  Do you get the same error?  Please see this SAP Note ...
    https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/smb_searchnotes/display.htm?note_langu=E&note_numm=0001303019
    Eddy

  • How to post a PARK document with Withholding Tax

    Hi All,
    I have parked a document using FB60.Vendor is subject to withholding tax.Now,when i am posting the document through FBV0,the error message displayed is :
    "Field BSEG-SECCO does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0303".
    The error message says that Section Code (Withholding Tax) is missing for Special G/L Indicator Line Item.I dont have provision to enter section code in the screen.
    My entries are :
    29J Vendor a/c  Dr.
    50   XYZ a/c
    If i using F-02 and not parking ;then it is getting posted.
    Note: Line Item is a special G/L Indicator
    Please advise how to post a park document using FBV0 with special g/L Indicator and vendor is subject to withholding tax.

    Hi Parag,
    Section code field doesnot exist in the special G/L indicator line item of the document.So,i cannot enter it.
    But,when posting the parked document ,it is asking for Section Code.
    The error message displayed is:
    "Field BSEG-SECCO. does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0303"

  • Cannot create AR Invoice negative amount with WithHolding Tax negative amount via DI API

    Hi All,
    I tried to create AR Invoice Document via DI API, but with negative amount and negative withholding tax amount.
    Document added successfully, but when i open the document in SAP, and i open WTax Table information, withholding tax amount become zero,
    Please see image below.
    But when i add the same document through SAP Screen, i can fill WTax Amount with negative amount.
    SAP Version 9.0 PL 5
    Please kindly help,
    Thanks
    Best Regards
    Siddharta

    Hello.
    If this is different to the behavior of the B1 application it should be considered a bug - like any such difference between DI API and app.
    HTH

  • Upgrade Issue: With-holding TAX Conversion  From Classic to Extended.

    Dear Friends,
    I am working for an Upgrade Project. (From 4.5 to ECC 6.0)
    Please help me with steps for convesion of With-holding tax from Classic to Extended.
    Your help will be appriciated and Rewarded.
    Thank you,
    DARSHAN PATEL

    Hi,
    Converting from classic to Extended withholding tax is possible but be sure once do.
    Spro-Sap reference img-Financial accounting-withholding tax-withholding tax change over- MAP TAX CODES AND HEALTH CHECK AND MIGRATION PROGRAMS.
    YOU HAVE TO UPDATE YOUR TAX CODES LIKE CENTRAL INVOICE PROPORTIONATELY...
    IF IT HELPFUL ASSIGN POINTS, ANY PROBLEM REVERT BACK ME.
    REGARDS,
    SANKAR

  • Standard LSMW for open vendor items with Withholding tax

    Hi All,
    I am searching the direct input LSMW which is having the Withholdig tax. There is a direct input program in LSMW ( RFBIBL00) but it is not uploaded the withholding tax for open vendor and open customer items.
    If anybody know which LSMW is recammanded or anthing related to BAPI or IDOC for this requirements.
    Dhiraj.

    Hi
    If you need to upload the WT tax you have to fill the structure BWITH of std BI RFBIBL00, so your LSMW project should create a file like this:
    ---> Session data
    BGR00
    ---> Document data
    BBKPF (Header data
    BBSEG (Vendor or customer item)
    BWITH (Withholding tax data)
    BBSEG (G/L item)
    Max

  • With holding Tax for Interested paid to bank

    Dear Gurus,
    User making payment to bank ( which include interest), he want to withheld TDS @22.44% on interest amount.
    How we can map into SAP.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    First you have to create the withholding tax type i think 194a, after that create the withholding tax key Rate, then you will link up the withholding tax type and keys.
    you will goto this path Spro>Financial Accounting Global settings>Withholding tax>Withholding tax>Withholding tax.
    in this path you will maintain all the properties.
    it is helpful give me reward points
    Thanks
    gvr

  • Issue With PO taxes ?????

    i have a po of worth 10,000 inr
    now i have to apply taxes on the above amount in the follwoing way
    70% of the amount @12.5%
    30%of the amount @14.5
    please help me in this ..
    Thanks in Advance...

    Hi,
    I think you have not analyze yet. Just you asking issue what system is calculating! You must understand business process as based on business process tax process designed in system.
    You already confirmed that two condition types JEXS & JEXY is there in TAX procedure...
    1st you should understand that  why two condition types JEXS & JEXY  for CST only for same tax %value.
    May two condition types created for CST & one CST for Setoff and another CST for to inventorised.
    Now just cross check by creaing new  tax codes with two options and see the impact in creating PO and then do GR( try DEV system)
    Option-1;;;;; create  Tax Code C4  with condition types JEXS & ( also maintain condition record in FV11),see result
    Option-::::::: create Tax code C5  with condition types JEXY  & ( also maintain condition record in FV11),see result
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for