MIGO Cancellation with MM Small Difference

Hi SAP Guru,
i have question regarding "MM Small diff. loss" in the accounting document for Good Receipt (cancellation).
in Period 09/12 my material "ABC" cost price is 33.60, and this material stock is for Plant "1000". the order quantity is 48 unit. When creating PO, my user has wrongly put the cost price to 3.60, and that PO XXXXXX has been good receipt in period 09/12.
with in the period 09/12. there is other PO that has been GR with the correct Cost price (33.60). In the Period 10/12 my user has realize the cost price for PO XXXXX  is wrong, and my user has perform the cancellation using MIGO,
when i check the cancellation accounting document, i found out there is a line item for "MM small diff. loss". what does this "MM small diff. loss" mean ? as my understanding , i know found this on the MIRO.
thie is account entry
11109050      Stock-PrtGenuinePart           1,612.80-
21104010      GRIR GenuinePar                  161.28
60220940      MM small diff. loss                 1,451.52

Whenever there is a price variance during goods posting or invoice posting, in case of standard price, a price difference account is being hit to clear it.
But sometimes price difference account also pops up in moving average price. Whenever there is a price variance and we dont have enough stock/stock value to clear it, then the remaining amount will hit the price difference.
As your case is normal and just  to understand better, I provide another example.
MAP : 10 INR
Total stock quantity: 10 EA
Total stock value: 100 INR
Now an invoice for 40 material with price variance of 5 INR ( ie the invoice price per unit = 10 INR- 5 INR =5INR ) have to be posted . So the stock account should be credited ny 5*40 INR = 200 INR . But the total stock value is 100 INR.
In this case the system credit the stock account by 105 INR =50 INR, and post the remaining 305 INR = 150 INR to price difference account.

Similar Messages

  • Asset Balances not tally to GL Balances with small difference .1 paisa

    Hi Guru,
    Asset balance report- s_alr_87011964 not tally to GL balance- FBL3N with a small difference .1 paisa,Please sombody can help me solve this issue.
    Advance thanks.
    Thanks,
    ND

    Hi,
    You need to pass some manual entries through OASV.
    Values appear in asset reports are coming from AS91.
    Entries passed through OASV are update in gl accounts.
    Before passing the entries please check the values.
    Hope this will clear.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Small differences between while canceling invoice.

    Hello,
    While checking the accounting documents I  have notices that there are small differences between the GR document invoice document. The differences has occurred on GR\IR account and stock account  during canceling the invoice and is 0.01 EUR.
    The GR\IR was credited   with 0.01 less and the stock account was credited   with 0.01 EUR more according to the invoice which was cancel. see below.
    Could you help to und erstand the procedure?
    If it is a standard behavior? If not. How can it be resolved?
    Before (invoice)
    Stock account       101.00+
    GR/IR account        21.53+
    After (after canceling MR8M)
    Stock account       101.01-
    GR/IR account        21.52-
    R
    M.

    Hello Taj,
    Please explain if this differences which you get information from SAP can occur when the process is finish (all GR and IR posted) or in progress as well?
    R
    M

  • Acct determination for Materials management small differences with keys

    Dear all,
    While posting a document in MIRO, it throws error as 'Acct determination for Materials management small differences with keys not defined in ch/acts'.
    Please advise a solution to rectify this error.
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Hi,
    It seems due to small differences between debit and credit side you are not able to post the document price differences). Check all the data to create an entry first and  Check the data format. Can you check  in OBYC is there a way  to  have a transaction DIF (Materials management small differences) post to different GL accounts based on valaution class (plant)?

  • MIGO vs MB1a - cancellation with reference to order

    Folks,
    Within MB1A we have the option to make a cancellation with reference to order by going into the menu in the selection screen:
    Goods issue / Cancel with reference / To order.
    This allows the user to only cancel issues for those items that were initially issued on the order. I was trying to find the same logic in MIGO but I cant find it. Customizing also only shows Material document as reference document for cancellations. We cannot add another reference document, or can we?
    Thanks,
    MZ

    Hi,
    MIGO is the enjoy transaction can be used for GR,GI  and CANCELLATION. If you want to cancell with reference to order, that order might be partially completed, still delivery need to done on this, to which quantity in order you will post cacellation. Hence SAP system proposed to refer materila document as a reference for cancellation. With that reference the items which are issued or received can be cancelled exactly (quantity and amount)
    In MB1A :It is purely related to GI and refer the order
    Hence in standard SAP in MIGO, you cannot have option of order as reference for cancellation. I hope it will help you. Thanking you.

  • Automatic Clearing with Small Difference

    Hi all,
    I want to one GL Account to Automatic Clearing (f.13) with Small Difference consider with another GL account.
    Manual Clearing Working is fine.
    Regards,
    Spradip
    Edited by: spradip on Dec 20, 2011 1:24 PM

    you will have to setup the open item clearing config
    GL based tolerances
    tolerance grp
    assigning tolerance grp to users
    have a clearing GL to clear the difference amount.
    If these are setup correctly, the clearing is possible.
    once this config is setup, try manual clearing once and then use the same GL as part of F.13.
    if you have problems and If you are an ABAP savvy, try debugging and catch hold of what is it looking for....usually the above setting should help you clear.

  • MBST behaves Differently with MIGO Cancellation

    Hi,
    I have configured some customised movement types to have their reversed movement types as "qty can be entered...". That is, the quantity can be changed when performing cancellation of material document.
    It works well with the old transaction MBST and MB1A (cancel with reference to material document). However, when I try it with MIGO with Cancellation option, it does not work. The quantity field is grey out, not changable. Anyone any idea why is this so? Thanks.
    Regards,
    Norman

    Hi Norman,
    As an option, you can go into the MIGO transaction, use same selections as you would to create the goods receipt document (ex. Goods Receipt, Purchase Order) but in the movement type field, select your reversal movement type.  Quantity field is open for change.  From what I'm seeing (and from what you stated) the Cancellation option in MIGO assumes the full quantity of the material document is being reversed.
    Regards,
    Dawn

  • Problem while 're-posting' a cancelle Invoice with Exchange Rate Difference

    Hi Gurus,
    We are facing a problem while re-posting an Invoice with Exchange Rate Difference. I say re-posting because this invoice was previously posted and reversed on the same date. Here is the scenario along with the relevant postings:
    1)
    G/R is posted in September when the exchange rate for dollar was, say, Rs. 49 = 1 USD.
    Posting:
    Service A/C.....100 USD (Rs. 4900)
         To SR/IR Clearing A/C...100 USD (Rs. 4900)
    2)
    MIRO is done in October, when the exchange rate was, say, Rs. 48 = 1 USD. Thus, the exchange difference posting was done in the respective accounts.
    Posting:
    SR/IR Clearing A/C......100 USD (Rs. 4900)
         To Vendor A/C...........90 USD (Rs. 4320)
         To TDS A/C..............10 USD (Rs.  480)
         To Exch. Difference A/C. 0 USD (Rs.  100)
    This was the correct entry, however we missed out some TDS codes and thus needed to reverse this entry and repost it.
    3)
    Now this invoice was reversed (T.Code MIRO) in october itself on exactly the same date on which invoice was created, and it resulted in the following postings:
    Vendor A/C......90 USD (Rs. 4320)
    TDS A/C.........10 USD (Rs.  480)
         To SR/IR Clearing A/C...100 USD (4800, i.e. 48 * 100, Rs.48 being the exchange rate in october)
    4)
    Now when we try to post MIRO again, it is posting the following entry:
    SR/IR Clearing A/C......97.96 USD (Rs. 4800)
    Exch. Difference A/C.....2.04 USD (Rs.    0)
         To Vendor A/C........... 85 USD (Rs. 4080)
         To TDS1 A/C............. 10 USD (Rs.  480)
         To TDS2 A/C.............  5 USD (Rs.  240)
    This is a wrong entry. SR/IR clearing A/C should have been debited by 100 USD (Rs. 4900), and the Exch. Rate difference account should have been credited by 0 USD (Rs. 100)
    Can someone please help us with this. What the system seems to be doing is, that when the Invoice was reversed, the value that got reversed for SR/IR Clearing A/C was 100 USD but with Rs. 4800 instead of Rs. 4900. Now, when we try to repost the invoice, the system divided this value by the exchange rate prevalent in September, i.e. Rs. 49, thus the resultant value 97.96 USD (i.e.  4800 / 49).
    Please help.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Angad Nagpal

    Solved.
    The final entry is correct, as the net result in the G/L balances is the same. For further information please refer to notes 116250 and 46564.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Angad Nagpal

  • Error while posting F-28 with autoposting of small differences

    Hi
    in our secnario, we are using 3 currencies e.g. local currency 1 (USD), group currency (USD) & hard currency (INR).
    we have done necessary setting for auto posting small differences to another GL. while simulating the document, system able to determine the GL code correctly for all 3 currencies but unable to fetch the amount of small difference in case of hard currency. following is the entry simulated by system.
    entry in case of local and group currency:-
    001 40       0000100000      S.C. Bank                      39,991.00
    002 40       0000610000      Petty Amt.Round.Dif              9.00
    003 15       0100000099      customer                       40,000.00-
    004 40       0000610000      Petty Amt.Round.Dif               0.00
    005 50       0000704444      Ex. rate gains / lo                   0.00
    but in case of hard currency, following is the entry
    001 40       0000100000      S.C. Bank                   153,965.35
    002 40       0000610000      Petty Amt.Round.Dif            34.65
    003 15       0100000099      Customer                      40,000.00-
    004 40       0000610000      Petty Amt.Round.Dif             0.00
    005 50       0000704444      Ex. rate gains / lo       114,000.00-
    due to above situation, systmem unable to post the document. please revert if anybody has idea to resolve above problem.
    regards
    DD

    Hi ,
    Check if   both Direct/indirect Quotation s are Maintained for INR/USD and also check  rounding rules for INR/ USD Mainted.
    Thanks
    Goutam

  • Materials management small differences - DIF - Profit Center assignment.

    Hi,
    We have created one G/L for posting the u201CMaterials management small differencesu201D at the time of generating MIRO document via transaction u201CDIFu201D in Tcode - OBYC.
    For e.g. if the GR amount is 90 and IR (Invoice received from party) is of Rs. 91/- or vice-versa then for posting the difference of Rs. 1/- we have made the above assignment.
    System is generating the line item for the u201CSmall Diff -Invoice Verificationu201D but posting automatically to a "Dummy Profit Center u201C in the absence of any other data.
    Our point is that we want to change the profit center to the related Business area, which is there in the line item of u201CSmall Diff -Invoice Verificationu201D account.
    We tried the FI substitution (Tcode u2013 GGB1/ OBBH) for the Profit Center derivation on the basis of Business Area but that is working with the FI documents (Manual FI entry) only and not with the automatic line generation like MIRO in the above case.
    Later on I tried Tcode u2013 OKB9, but in that case after giving business area wise cost center substitution, system is correctly showing the entry (in simulation mode of MIRO transaction) in the required Cost Center & on that basis in the Profit Center, but still system requires u201CCO-Objectu201D
    Initially we tried other way of creating a Cost Element under the category of u201C11 u2013 Revenueu201D to maintain Business Area u2013 Profit Center link but still in that case also it requires co-object hence turned to changing the Cost Element Category to u201C1 u2013 Primary Costu201D for capturing Profit center on the basis of Business Area u2013 Cost Center link since basically G/L u2013 u201Csmall Diff -Invoice Verificationu201D we have created under u201CExpense Groupu201D.
    Our requirement is to post the entry in related profit center per Business Area in the line item of "Small Diff -Invoice Verification" since there are 6 to 7 business areas, which are active in system.
    Regards,
    Shridhar

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply. But I would like to correct you. I have mentioned in my subject line - "DIF" i.e the Transaction Key maintained in Transaction Code - OBYC for posting the small difference (Between GR and IR values) arriving at the time of MIRO transaction posting.
    Now meanwhile I have come across u201CSAP Note : 32654u201D which mentioned that "Account assignment for the transaction (KDR, DIF, UPF) on the highest level i.e. the 1st screen where we set the Cost Center or Profit Center assignment to Cost Element with Acct Assignment details (1 or 2 or 3) is possible.
    Same is not possible on details level means Acct Assignment details level per Valuation Area or Business Area for Cost Center or Profit Center linkage (2nd screen of OKB9).
    Please do correct me if I am making any wrong statement.
    Now would like to have an advise about the transaction Code - OKC9 with the scenario (MIRO document u2013 Dummy Profit center linkage) that I have mentioned above.
    Do I require to maintain OKB9 (At highest level) and then need to work out CO- Substitution via OKC9 ? Or OKC9 is enough to cover my scenario ?
    Do any body have a knowledge about that? Points will be assigned.
    Regards,
    Shridhar

  • Cost clearing account (COS) f.13 clearing small differences.

    Hi,
    We have a COS clearing account 1234.
    We have small differences which we would like to clear with F.13.
    I tried with OBA0, but I do not know how to activate the tolerance group on the G/L account
    because the tolereance group is missing and I cannot add it with field status.
    It could also be the case that it is not the correct way to do it.
    Please let me know.
    Best regards,
    Eric.

    Hi
    Can anybody help with this question, because the former solution I cannot fibure out that it helps, because I created everything, except the tolerance group on the G/L master. I cannot find the field.
    Best regards,
    eRic.

  • Small Differences posted to the same profit center

    Hello dear all,
    My problem is following:
    User post a document via MIRO.
    This document generated an accounting entries. All line are posted with profit center 1000 except one line was posted with profit center 2000.
    This is because the MM small differences (customizing in automatic psoting in FBKP) are customized to be posted to the account 658000.
    In OKB9, the account 658000 is linked to the cost center C0ZZ001 and the cost center COZZ001 is linked to the profit center 2000 in his master record and it's not possible to remove/change it since there transactions already posted in FI.
    That's why the system post automatically the differences with profit center 2000.
    User don't accept this and i don't have idea how to resolve this issue, since small differences should be posted always to the same G/L account.
    My question is: Is there a possibility to let system take always the profit center of the invoice for all lines ?
    Thank you in advance

    Hello Tarek
    Option 1
    When posting the original transaction you can replace the profit center 2000 with Profit center 1000 by over writing.
    Option 2
    You can repost the small difference amounts from Profit center 2000 to 1000 using transaction 9KE0.
    Option 3
    You can reallocate the 2000 small difference amounts to relevant profit center 1000 using distribution cycle. Transaction:4KE5
    Thanks
    Prasad

  • Cancellation with strings attached - no refunds yet

    Hello forum,
    Sorry if this is not the right place to post it, but I couldn't find any other that could fit better.
    Anyway, here's the issue... I had a big problem with the Apple Store (Mexico). I have bought the MacBook Pro 13', the one that costs ~1200 dollars. However, some hours later, I found out that there was an Apple retailer in the city I live on, with MacBook Pros on stock and with the same price of the online Apple Store. What did I do? I canceled the order and went straight to this retailer the next day.
    Arriving there, I happily got my credit-card and handed it to the guy -- I was very excited to put my hands on my new MacBook Pro -- then, the guy returned saying that my transaction was declined. What...? I did have funds for that, what the **** happened?
    The thing is: When you buy something through the apple store, they don't capture the money, but the credit gets "reserved" for apple, waiting for their sign to capture it.
    When you receive the whole product, they do capture the funds, and then you get charged on your next cc bill. However, when you cancel your order, *they don't sign the gatway/bank that they could release the funds back to the credit-card limit*. Nice uh?
    I then called apple. They say I have to call my bank. I called my bank. They say the funds will be back in 8 days (if the merchant doesn't give any sign of life in n days (n depends on the bank) the funds are automatically backported to your cc again) or that it could be back earlier if the merchant contacts the bank to do so.
    However, apple won't do it. The attendees will just say "Contact your bank".
    This is really "cancellation with string attached". Unfortunately, nobody could help me, and shame on Apple, who didn't really care on helping me solving this "small" detail.
    And here I am... 8 days to go
    Marcelo.

    Thank you for the replies, folks.
    There are two things that really disappointed me:
    - I had no idea it would happen. If there was a warning or something before canceling, I would probably not have canceled and let the order go (*I would have my mac by now*).
    - Apple won't help in any way. They just say "Call your bank". What's that for such an innovative company, couldn't they invest more in creating a more complete and customer-focused process here?
    @RedHagen: The situation is a little bit complicated for me. I'm not Mexican, I'm just staying here for some months, and I happened to buy through the Mexican Store. My bank is from Brazil, so, I'm not sure on how I could do this right now, but that's something I'll keep in mind, even though I don't think my country has such open access to the authorities as your country does :S
    In the end, I guess it would be just a matter of Apple implementing another step in this process: Of notifying the bank (probably through the cc gateway) that the credit can be released back.
    Thank you all for hearing me
    Marcelo.
    Message was edited by: celoserpa
    Message was edited by: celoserpa

  • DIFF BETWEEN MIGO CANCELL & MBST

    Dear All,
                            Can any one explain me that what is the difference between Cancellation by MIGO & Cancellation by MBST when excise invoice is captured & posted .
    regards
    sap11

    thanx pts given
    sap11

  • Is there a way of working collaboratively on a flex project with a small project group?

    Is there a way of working collaboratively on a flex project with a small project group?
    I am part of a small group of developers who wish to work on a single flex project together. Is there a way to set up flex so that the project can be developed by multiple people at the same time. I have seen one thread out on the internet about working locally and then uploading to SVn but this is not an option in this case.
    Any ideas.
    Many thanks in advance
    Dave

    I would say that rushing into development without a source-control system will cost you more in the long-run. If your organisation is serious about developing software it then it needs to invest in the necesary infrastructure, so you should get that process kicked-off as soon as possible.
    In the interim you could set-up a source control server on one developer's machine or commandeer a spare machine to use as a temporary source control server. Just make sure you have it backed-up regularly. Or you could use one of the online source control services; many will support private repositories for a small fee.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP PAVILION DV6T-7000 NOTEBOOK

    i bought a HP PAVILION DV6T-7000 NOTEBOOK and not even a year and the buttons on key board start moving and for the irony,when the warranty expired i lost the space buton,long story short went to buy one keyboar but based on hp specification part num

  • How to delete a 6.2gb file from my ipad.

    I downloaded 6.2gb of holiday video from my PC through iTunes to iMovie and synced onto my ipad. It used up the 6.2gb on my ipad (in settings) but does not appear anywhere at all.  How can I find and delete the 6.2gb from my ipad?

  • Simple Q about using a List in a bind variable

    Using jDev 11.1.1.3, still new to this ADF stuff In my UI i have a shuttle component that allows the user to move x number of items to the right pane. Each one of these items becomes part of a filter in a where clause of a query on my VO. Can I do th

  • Problem running third party apps in clean installed mavericks HELP....Consol code knowledge needed!

    Yo Guys I've had some kernel problems with my mid2010 MBP, problems booting, crashes etc. so decided to make a clean install of mavericks, first through the recovery partion, later at the genius bar (they coudnt help me and blamed my toshiba HD (not

  • Finding multiple strings in a text file and deleting the entire line

    Get-Content c:\output-Copy.txt | Where-Object {$_ -notmatch 'something1', 'something2', 'something3', 'something4' } | Set-Content temp.txt Above is the program that when it has 1 argument in the -notmatch part will find the specific string and delet