2nd Level Detail

I created a fully functional Master-Detail report by using the HTMLDB Master-Detail Wizard and converting the Detail Form to a Report Format.
Is it possible to drill down to a second level of detail from the first level of detail?
With no success, I tried manually creating a second level detail report with link from first level detail, but GUI prevents creation of certain objects, like Prev and Next Buttons with No Region (GUI demands selection of region) for pagination.
Any guidance or links to known examples would be appreciated.
Thanks

There is no wizard to help you out here, so with some experimentation, it is possible to go to a second level of detail. I got best results when the PK of first level detail table was the same name as the FK in the second level of detail table.
Created the report manually, and it is lacking PREV/NEXT controls in the row counter report footer. Still have not yet figured out how to invoke the NEXT/PREV with row counter in the report. Curently the NEXT/PREV are buttons in the region but not with the report counter object.

Similar Messages

Limited view on 2nd level Navigation Bar

Hi
Is there a way to assign permission on a page on the 2nd level navigation?
I explain:
First level has teh Entry Point "MY Work".
Second Level has the pages assigned to My Work
"Page A" "Page B" "Page C"
Currently, I assign My Work role to everyone, so they will view all 3 pages.
PROBLEM:... I want "Page C" to be under "My Work" BUT only be viewed by selected users.
Can this be done?
How else can I do this?
Help needed urgently!!
Appreciate any info
Thanx
RD

Hi RD,
two possibilities:
a) By merging roles (the standard way). See http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/53/89503ede925441e10000000a114084/frameset.htm for details. Experts would have roles "Everyone" as well as "Expert".
b) By delta links: You create a workset as entry point "MyWork" containing Pages A and B; this workset is assigned to Role Everyone. Than you create a Role "Expert", assign the workset "MyWork" as deltalink (already containing pages A and B), now adding page C. Experts would have Role "Expert" only.
Hope it helps
Detlev

2nd level navigation

Hi Community,
we have a fpn working here with RRA. Filter_id's are implemented in the consumer portal desktops. Navigation is built by roles
RoleA (Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
- RoleB(Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
- FolderA
- FolderB
- RoleC(Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
- FolderC
If i call a desktop which has no elements with the filter_id all entry points appear, which means 1st, 2nd level and detailed navigation (correctly). So i guess its no permission problem. But if i call a desktop with filter id "A" only first level appears.
I tried
- different merge id's to merge all under RoleA (e.g. RoleA merge_id = x, RoleBC merge_id = xd)
- not to filter second level
- defining folder as entry points and roles not
Someone knows how to merge and filter them correctly? Help please.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
Check this weblog.
EFP: Working with the new Taglibs - Part 3
Reward useful answers
Regards,
Ganesh N

Capture Excise on Purchase through 1st Level and 2nd Level

Dear all,
Please clear about the Functionality to Capture Excise on Purchase through 1st Level and 2nd Level Dealer Invices in details please.
Regards,
Vishal

hi,
for dealer invoice we first do j1iex here we capture the excise duties
then we do migo &
again we do j1iex to post the excise invoice.

Duplicate records for Sale Order Cycle Report(excluding item level detail)

I have posted this issue in number of forums but till today no one is able to answer it correctly.Here it is:
I need to create a report which I think most of the sd consultants have also done it.It basically covers sales order cycle without item lvel detail such as:
Sale Order No -- Sales Order Date-- Delivery No-- Delivery Date
Now as we all know ,sales orders and deliveries are connected through item table which means in the output I will get duplicate rows for the report above.For Example, if a sales order share 3 items with the delivery then we will get 3 exact duplicate rows in the report.
What can be the best solution?connecting through VBFA has alos same result as it also has item level details.
I need a good solution.This a common report and there must be some solution

Hiiii,
It is standard SAP rule that system will catch the document flow (document link history) at item level.
Now your problem that you dont want to show the line item based report because of duplicacy.
Try this.
Brows table VBFA -
In screen selection select the following......
1. Subsiquent document category
2. Preceding item
select "J" in Subsiquent document category
and "000010" in Preceding item then execute the table.
Now system will not show multple line item based delivery report. so No duplicacy will be there
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar

Leave request is not coming in 2nd level approval in MSS NWBC

Hi all,
I am getting the leave request for 2nd level approval in MSS work item.
But I want that in MSS Leave approval () .
Is there any configuration to do for this.?

I am getting the leave request for 2nd level approval in MSS work item ?
your getting leave request in POWL Application i.e Bulk approval list. This is correct only.
But I want that in MSS Leave approval () . ?
Can you explain little more clear.

Link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item for extraction to 2nd level

Hi Guys ,
I am having a requirement that need to pull the following data to 2nd level DSO
1. Delivery Header Data
2. Sales Order Item data. ( Sales Document, Item, Item RDD, Material)
So I am planning create a 2nd level DSO on top of Delivery header and need to pull the sales order ITEM level data ( Sales document , Order ITEM, ITEM RDD date , Material) through start routine u2026
How can I pull the Sales Order Item data through start routine? i.e I need the link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item Data .
or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).
Thanks
Edited by: krismady on Sep 22, 2010 2:26 AM
or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).

Hi Krish,
You can use VBLEN (Sales Document) to link Delivery header DS (2LIS_12_VCHDR) and Delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM). Now In delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM) you have VGBEL (Reference doc.) and VGPOS (Reference item) which is nothing but sales order document number and sales item in Order item DS (2LIS_11_VAITM) .
So you need to link in above way to get other values in your DSO.
It is proven method.
Thanks,
Uday Shankar.

Dunning - 2nd level dunning is not working

Hello Experts
I have received a requirement from client for configuration of two level dunning (ie 14 & 35 days). I did the following configuration
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Letter 1 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 1
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
Letter 2 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 2
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
(c) Maintained the Dunning Area in customer master data -> Company code data -> Correspondance
(d) I have posted the sales invoice with posting date and due date as 01.03.2011.
While carrying the dunning activtity through T.Code F150 (I did the 1st level run with dunning date as 22.03.2011 ) -> All the activities are going smothly like Dunning selection completed, Dunning Print out completed and Sample Printout is completed for the 1st level
The second level dunning is carried on 26.04.2011 as dunning date. However, after completion of selection perameters. the system is showing as Dunning Selection is completed bu the system log says as follows:
Date        Time               Message
26.04.2011 15:34:12    Job started
26.04.2011 15:34:12    Step 001 started (program SAPF150S2, variant &0000000000523, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:34:12     ******************   Log for dunning run 20110430 / TEST1 ****************
26.04.2011 15:34:13     =========================================================================
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061, company code SC01 is being processed
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >            Reading account data and document information    Phase 0
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061 has a payment method for incoming payments
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061 read items: 11
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >             Processing and completing dunning lines         Phase I
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000052/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0090000380/2008/001 has new dunning level 1.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000381/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000384/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000387/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000614/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 1400000052/2008/002 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 1800000012/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000433/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000437/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >           Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos     Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >           Minimum charges and dunning interest             Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >             Generate dunning data                           Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14    Job finished
If i continue the Dunning Print & Sample Print out.. the system is showing the following logs
Date        Time      Message
26.04.2011 15:35:31     Job started
26.04.2011 15:35:31     Step 001 started (program SAPF150D2, variant &0000000000344, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:35:31     >        Start print phase
26.04.2011 15:35:31               0 dunning notices were read
26.04.2011 15:35:31               0 dunning notices have been printed
26.04.2011 15:35:31    End dunning printout 30.04.11 / TEST1
26.04.2011 15:35:31    Job finished
Kindly let me know, did i missed any steps in the configuration??
Regards
Anil

Hello Renan
Thanks for your reply, I am finding difference during 1st run and 2nd level run during selection perameters in the following area.
(Note that, we are not using the Interest / charges)
During 1st level dunning the system is showing as Dunning Level Log under Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV document no.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >           Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos     Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >           Minimum charges and dunning interest             Phase III
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Interest indicator 0N and currency GBP are missing in T056Z
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >             Generate dunning data                           Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.area. Dunning area 58 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.level. Dunning level 1 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 uses dunning procedure DG3
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Dunning level D 0000000061 is used for account 1
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >   Document 0064000438/2010/001: Dunning level 1, days in arrears 20, status <.Dpi>
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning data has been generated.
26.04.2011 15:30:39    Job finished
Where as for 2nd level dunning the system is showing under Dunning Level Log is as follows:
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Minimum charges and dunning interest Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Generate dunning data Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14   Job finished
Due to this, i am presumed that some more configuration has been missed at my end.
Kindly revert with your observations in the above log
Regards
Anil

How to move the item level details to line item in the Purchase order form

Hello,
I am in SAP SRM7.0 system, my customers requirement is that the item level details like MPN (Manufacturer Part Number) etc.. should be moved to line item field in the Puchase Order.
Can any one give me susggestion on this. This is not the correct forum for this thread but still pls post the link of related threads which may help in this regard.
Regards
Madhan

HI Masa,
THanks a lot for your reponse, in the option given by you i could find it to make visible or required but there is clue on moving the MPN to item field in the line item level. Can you give more input on this.
Regards
Madhan

How to remove repeated entries of Group level details?

My Crystal reports has three groups and layout is:
GH1
GH2
GH3
Details
GF3
GF2
GF1
I'm listing details under GF3. Is there a way I can control repeated listing of GH1 and GH2 data in different lines?
e.g., my data column is: (zone, Bin, item name) and Zone is first level Group data, second level group data is at Bin level and third group is at item level.
some record are like:
(AZone, A1Bin, item1), (AZone, A1Bin, item2), (AZone, A2Bin, item3), by listing the details (zone, bin, Item) at GF3, my data is printed like this:
AZone     A1Bin     item1
AZone     A1Bin     item2
AZone     A2Bin     item2.
I want to print Zone and Bin level details only when these changes like:
AZone      A1Bin     item1
          item2
     A2Bin     item3
Any help on how can I achieve this? I don't want to pring Zone or Bin level details in seperate rows, these should appear together as listed above, also for fulfiling other requirements, I need to out data in GF3 section only.

on that Common Tab it also has "Suppress if Duplicated",
however, you would be far better off to work this out by tweaking
the query (if you can) with joins and filters.
Hope this helps,
The Panda

InfoCube design - high granularity by inclusion of document level detail

When considering the inclusion of sales document level detail in an infocube (0DOC_NUMBER/0S_ORD_ITEM), two possible high-level designs come to mind:
1. Make sales document number/sales order item master data carrying infoobjects and include in infocube as line item dimensions. Activate all necessary characteristic navigational attributes for reporting.
2. Model infocube dimensions to contain all necessary charactistics for reporting with inclusion of characteristics sales document number/sales order item therefore, fact table will have highest level of granularity.
Knowing the 'textbook' does not suggest the above designs, has anyone attempted maximum granularity in infocube design with success or otherwise? If successful, has this design outperformed DSO or InfoSet reporting performance?
Thank you - Brendan.

Hi Brendan,
we have implemented both solutions; it all depends on the number of documents. if it is much more than 1 mio; I recommend storing your data in the target; if it is 1 or 2 mio you can have master data (more flexible).
We have some 4 mio records in 0MAT_PLANT and are starting having performance issues.
by the way; if you are using ORACLE, NEVER mark a dimension with high cardinality; that doesn't work.
hope that helps
Olivier.
Message was edited by:
Olivier Cora

2nd level of Drill Down

Hello,
I am making the Drill Down configuration.
1st Level is
- Area
2nd Level is
-Branch
3rd Level is
-Shops
After I make above configuration, I test this on the BI Answers.
ex)
Area
New York
Tokyo
Paris
1. I click the column "Tokyo".
2. Then the report will show like this
Area 　　Branch
Tokyo　　Asakusa
　　　　　　Ginza
and I can click "Tokyo","Asakusa" and "Ginza".
But at this point, I don't want to let users click the "Tokyo" column , but only "Asakusa" and "Ginza" columns.
Is it possible by the configuration of the BIEE Repository or Answers ??

Hi,
I dont think so it is possible.
But If you click "tokyo" only you can see "Asakusa" and "Ginza".How would you stop user to not click tokyo if you want to get to other step to "branches".
If you want to achieve that directly create a dimension for Branch and shops.So user will see branches and shops and make it as a separate sheet for that specific user and give him permissions.
Hope it helps you.
By,
Kranthi.

Just I want to know What is 1st level & 2nd level support

At client place on shore in production support project in as What is 1st level & 2nd level support?
and Nature of work
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:34 PM
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:37 PM

I would still defend myself saying that this has already been answered...
I just did a search on SDN and found a post that would answer your question....
Re: Help desk& rollup
you are looking at L1 and L2 support....
The thread was locked because the question is already answered ( or discussed about ) in another post and you can get your answers faster by just searching....
Also if you do find the answers fetched as not being correct or accurate enough - you would need to mention that you did search the forums before posting. This way questions which have already been answered are not brought up again and it ends up with others doing the searching for you which paints a wrong picture...
Also in some cases L1 teams are merged with the company's existing L1 support desk to avoid confusion but follow similar rules as mentioned in the link and simlarly L2 - when you have multiple systems being supported by a central support team you get such scenarios where L1 and L2 are on-shore.
My 0.02
Arun Varadarajan
P.S I am removing the reference to my name in the title... and BTW the search took me less than 2 minutes ... which is why we want people to use the search functionality more than raising duplicate posts....
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:35 PM
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:36 PM

Second level detail in master-detail via VL does not return rows

Sorry, I did not want to repost the entire thread. Please see the last entry in the following thread for my urgent question.
second level detail in master-detail-detail does not return rows
"second level detail in master-detail-detail does not return rows"
Thanks so much!
Teri

Ahhh ... that explains everything!
You wrote:
ListView1
-> ListRowView2 (via ListRowFkLink1)
-> ListValueView2 (via ListValueFkLink2)
That's why I thought it's a master and two details.
But it's more like:
ListView1
-> ListRowView2 (via ListRowFkLink1)
-> ListValueView2 (via ListValueFkLink2)Is that correct?
That's the explanation.
A ViewLink is basically a RowSetIterator controlling a detail RowSet. When the iterator navigates, the detail RS is refreshed.
When you create a hierarchy in the wizard, the controlling master iterator is always the default iterator! But you used a new iterator (listRowIter) to iterate over your first detail. The default iterator of that first detail didn't move, hence the RowSet of your second detail was not refreshed.
When you navigate in the tester, the tester always uses the default iterator. That's why it worked there.
Sascha

Item Level Details in Output Requirements Control during Inbound Delivery

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement to access item level details of an inbound delivery at the time of processing the output requirement. The output requirement is defined for application E1 and has a related communication structure KOMKBE1. However, this structure does not have item details (Material, Plant, Batch is what is needed) . Is there another global communication structure that stores this data when the output requirement is called? If not, is there any other way to access that data during runtime?
It is not possible to fetch it from the database tables because the delivery creation process is not yet complete and thus it is not stored in the database, as the output requirement is called when the SAVE button is clicked in VL31N.
Thanks,
- Neeraj
EDIT: Found a solution: Using field symbols, I picked up the value of the needed details from the structures available in the calling program SAPMV50A. In this case, I did not use KOMKBE1 at all.
Edited by: NeerajAngal on Oct 6, 2010 12:28 PM

Hi
As per my understanding you can try se63 option ..

2nd Level Detail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for