790FX overclocking limits questions

I currently have an AMD64 X2 5600+ stock 200Mhz OC'd to 217MHz (14x)
At 100% utilization the cpus are running at around 54-56C (1.35V)
TMPIN1 which is the northbridge I think, is around 46C
TMPIN2 which judging by the heat coming off the plate, is the transistor/power cluster temp is showing 120C. Another clue that this isn't a chip is the fact my motherboard still works and the temp hasn't risen at all during the OC process :P
TMPIN3 is 30-31C.
At this OC the memory frequency is ~434MHz (corsair xms2 ddr800)
This seems stable but I'd like to push it a little further.
Is it possible to fry your memory with the Overdrive utility autoclocking it?
I haven't done much with this utility and am not sure where to draw the line...
I'm pretty amazed I was able to let it go this far and still be stable.
I'm well aware of what happens when OC goes bad 8) but really want to know how far you can trust this tool to not let the smoke out...
I'm going to run for a few days like this and test stability. I've played around with OC in the past but am really a complete n00b doing it on newer boards, especially the 790 series.
-Viz

@rgviza:
Why do you keep quoting your post?

Similar Messages

MOVED: 790FX overclocking limits questions

This topic has been moved to Overclockers & Modding Corner.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=118445.0

@rgviza:
Why do you keep quoting your post?

Iphone Limitations Question

I'm so excited for its release within the next couple of days but I have a question about the limits/restrictions that apple has put on these applications. Can anyone elaborate on the possible apps (i.e. new themes, screen savers, video record, copy and paste, flash player, live TV, ect.).
I know that people will say that live TV is not possible but MLB.com is coming out with an app that allows live TV streaming.
Any details would be great thanks.

they havent really said much...i know some may be free and others may charge a fee to download(this is up to the application's creator)...ther is a limit, i believe, of 2GB for an application..most im sure will not be that big.
i believe MLB.com might use Flash for live broadcasts, but as of right now Adobe, creator of Flash, have only said that they are trying to develop a Flash application for the iPhone

4GB limitation questions

Couple of questions regarding the 4GB limit:
Are indexes included in the 4GB?
How is the 4GB measured?
Is there a way to query the database to find out how close to the limit the database is? (preferably a simple SQL query, so that an application can warn about impending space limits on startup).
Thanks for any response.
-Darryl
(And please consider a version for Mac OS X)

Here is the procedure I use in my production, test and development systems.
Later, Dive / Fly / Ride / Sail Safe
-Rob
PROCEDURE p_FreeSpace(pTablespace_name IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL) IS
CURSOR tbs_cur IS
SELECT tablespace_name, SUM(bytes) bytes
FROM dba_data_files
WHERE (pTablespace_name IS NULL) OR ( pTablespace_name IS NOT NULL AND tablespace_name = upper(pTablespace_name))
GROUP BY tablespace_name;
--v_tot_space NUMBER := NULL;
v_used NUMBER := NULL;
v_free NUMBER := NULL;
v_tot_free NUMBER := NULL;
v_tot_used NUMBER := NULL;
v_max_free NUMBER := NULL;
pct_free NUMBER := NULL;
chunks NUMBER := NULL;
BEGIN
dbms_output.put_line('TABLESPACE ' || c.tab || ' Total Space Space Used Free_space Pct Free Max free_extent #free extents');
dbms_output.put_Line('----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
FOR tbs_rec IN tbs_cur
LOOP
-- SELECT sum(bytes)
-- INTO v_used
-- FROM dba_segments
-- WHERE tablespace_name = tbs_rec.tablespace_name;
select sum(f.bytes)-sum(s.bytes)
into v_used
from dba_data_files f,
dba_free_space s
where s.tablespace_name = f.tablespace_name
and s.tablespace_name = tbs_rec.tablespace_name;
-- v_tot_used := v_tot_used + v_used;
SELECT sum(bytes), max(bytes), count(*)
INTO v_free, v_max_free, chunks
FROM dba_free_space
WHERE tablespace_name = tbs_rec.tablespace_name;
-- v_tot_free := v_tot_free + v_free;
pct_free := v_free / tbs_rec.bytes * 100;
dbms_output.put_line(rpad(tbs_rec.tablespace_name,15,' ') || c.tab ||
--to_char(v_tot_space,'9,999,999,999') || chr(9) ||
to_char(tbs_rec.bytes,'99,999,999,999') || c.tab ||
to_char(nvl(v_used,0),'99,999,999,999') || c.tab ||
to_char(v_free,'99,999,999,999') || c.tab ||
to_char(pct_free,'999.999') || c.tab ||
to_char(v_max_free,'999,999,999,999') ||
to_char(chunks,'999,999,999,999'));
END LOOP;
IF pTablespace_name IS NOT NULL THEN
p_datafiles(pTablespace_name);
END IF;
END p_FreeSpace;
inms_test> exec util.p_freespace
TABLESPACE Total Space Space Used Free_space Pct Free Max free_extent #free extents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CWMLITE 20,971,520 15,663,104 5,242,880 25.000 5,242,880 1
DATA 943,718,400 538,836,992 404,815,872 42.896 336,527,360 3
DRSYS 20,971,520 8,060,928 12,845,056 61.250 12,845,056 1
HIST_DATA 1,677,721,600 1,265,631,232 412,024,832 24.559 412,024,832 1
INDX 445,644,800 377,094,144 68,485,120 15.368 68,091,904 2
LOB_DATA 19,461,570,560 19,277,021,184 184,483,840 .948 184,483,840 1
SYSTEM 372,244,480 363,552,768 8,683,520 2.333 8,527,872 3
TOOLS 10,485,760 0 10,420,224 99.375 10,420,224 1
UNDOTBS 351,272,960 11,714,560 339,410,944 96.623 210,698,240 9
USERS 209,715,200 209,256,448 393,216 .188 393,216 1
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.92
inms>

Connection limits questions.

Hi all.
i got a crahed 5520 this week and was showing
<163>Nov 28 2011 11:34:45: %ASA-3-201013: Per-client connection limit exceeded -125/100
What the negative number tells ? i usually see same numbers like 100/100 with means the connection limited has reached.
also the box was showing
<163>Nov 28 2011 19:51:17: %ASA-3-210007: LU allocate xlate failed
<161>Nov 28 2011 17:50:44: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface OUTSIDE
from the last 2 log messages its showing that the box was out of resources correct ?
Thanks.

The negative numbers reading is caused by a bug. Please see "CSCtl23397 - ASA may log negative values for Per-client conn limit exceeded messg".
The 210007 message is indicating stateful failover is out of resources. See this explanation.
Overall it appears your boxes may be pushing the limit of their capabilities connection-wise. Some further investigation would be required to determine whether that was a one-time event or indicative of a need to upgrade (memory or device).

Compressor/Limiter questions

I've read a lot of posts about putting a Compressor and/or Limiter on the Main Output at the Concert Level to help with balancing volumes (i.e preventing volume spikes that **** off the sound man). Can someone explain if you use BOTH what are the best settings of each for live use?
Thanks,
Stewart

I've really gotten into STP, which is track, rather than clip based. So I separate the tracks based more or less, on who they are and their environment. Then I apply an effect to the entire track: like compressor limiter on a VO, maybe a touch of reverb. For location shots with dialogue I'm able to copy certain effects back and forth and apply them where needed and change then to accommodate the environment, removing noise, that sort of thing. I save time by reducing the work I do in FCP, and working in broad sweeps in STP. However, it's only worthwhile on sizable projects. If the piece is small I just keep it in FCP and apply effects to specific clips. I haven't had any issues as you describe in export.

Creative Suite 6 limits question

Creative Cloud
'Plans for Individuals> Complete'
Partial payment will be.
Users do not buy Creative Suite 6
'Plans for Individuals> Complete' payment
Cloud during the period available for all products in the Creative Suite 6?

Hi Shine Orange,
I'm sorry I don't understand your question.
This might help:
http://www.adobe.com/products/creativecloud/faq.html
-Dave

AU Peak Limiter Question???

If I'm recording a spoken word podcast using an AU Peak Limiter while recording, do I need to leave it on while editing in post? Does it make any difference?

yobofofas wrote:
do I need to leave it on while editing in post? Does it make any difference?
yes, it makes a 100% diffference, becuase it does nothing to the recording. ALL effects are rendered real time during playback

Overclock temperature question with amd cpu

hi, I have a amd opteron 165 dual core, and I overclock it to 2700 mhz,
the temperature at 1800 mhz (standar mhz) is 43 - 55 , and with OC is 49- 66, is this normal?? is dangerous??
please I need an advice
MI PC:
amd opteron 165
msi k8n sli
corsair xms 512 pro drr 500 (2 gb)
sata 2 250 gb seagate
thermaltake pfc 500w dual fan
thermaltake blue orb 2 cpu fan

Quote from: BOSSKILLER on 31-January-07, 17:51:35
66C is too high to me, yes, think its danger. its expected to be hot due high quantity of transistors compared to the other one, but 66C is in danger zone.
what vcore you use on it?
hi, my vcore, (ewverest ultimate edition) is 1.43 - 1.47 (on bios I put 1.48)
Quote from: Frankenputer on 31-January-07, 21:27:39
That does seem a tad too close to the danger zone. Is this the standard AMD HSF? Check the case cooling. Do you have good airflow? Do you have fans that move enough air? Check the fins and fan for the HS for dust. Neaten up the cabling and ensure you have good airflow inside and outside of the case.
You could try to clean the HS and IHS with some 90%+ alcohol, put on some quality paste, like ArticSilver5, and reseat the HS. A better after-market HS would be a better solution than using the standard HS, especially for OC'g.
yes I have a good airflow, but... I don´t use a quality paste... I use normal one... I tried this, and post them later
thanks guys!! and sorry my bad english
pd: what´s means HSF?? HS and IHS???

MSI X79A-GD45 8D overclocking 3930k question about Power Saving Features

hi guys
i could do the oc for my 3930k.Now i am on 4.3ghz.Here are the settings i made ;
i didnt change the cpu multiplier left it on auto.
EIST and Turbo features are on.I just change the multpliers of the core limits for every core.I made core limit 43 for all cores.
Also i set the vcore offset feature to %12.5 and it made the voltage under load 1.280 which can hold system stable @ 4.3ghz.
when cpu is idle multiplier and voltage decreasing and when the cpu is under load voltages and multipliers increase.
thats what i want. But;
i tested the vcore offset as %100 the auto voltage under load increases to max 1.344.If i go for 4.8ghz probably i would need more than 1.344 on this situation what will happen?because i will need more than 1.344 but the auto voltage will give me just 1.344.How can we arrange this?
then i tried to enter voltage manually but the voltage didnt decrease even all the power saving features on.I haven't change any settings i mentioned above for the 4.3ghz oc.I just changed the vcore voltage to manuel. Everything stayed the same like decreasing multiplier under idle and increasing multipliers under load except the voltage.It stayed the same as i gave in the bios.
from here
I read from somewhere that on msi boards if you put the cpu multipler manually you loose power saving features.Everytime under load or idle cpu will be stay at the same ghz.Is that true?
if i give the cpu multiplier manuel or vcore voltage can i benefit from the power saving features like decreasing voltages and multiplier under idle and and incresing them under load ?
or when i enter the cpu multiplier and voltage manually ,does the power saving features go away?

Quote from: Froggy Gremlin on 29-November-12, 19:15:02
VDroop set to 100% is all you are going to get. 1.344v's should get you about 44-46X on the cores on 'Auto'. The voltage goes down from there with the lower VDroop settings. With CPU V. set to 'Auto', you get power saving, soon as the CPU V. is taken out of 'Auto', you lose it. No, the CPU speed may lower, but the voltage going to it will not.
VDroop is not a true offset feature like can be found on other brands of boards. https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=162779.0
Most folks around the industry recognize 1.350v's as the recommended limit for socket 2011 CPU's, so 1.344v's is fairly close to that anyway.
So when i set the voltage and the cpu multiplier i loose power saving features right?
Thanks for the reply

MOVED: MSI X79A-GD45 8D overclocking 3930k question about Power Saving Features

This topic has been moved to Overclocking, Undervolting.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=163826.0

Quote from: Froggy Gremlin on 29-November-12, 19:15:02
VDroop set to 100% is all you are going to get. 1.344v's should get you about 44-46X on the cores on 'Auto'. The voltage goes down from there with the lower VDroop settings. With CPU V. set to 'Auto', you get power saving, soon as the CPU V. is taken out of 'Auto', you lose it. No, the CPU speed may lower, but the voltage going to it will not.
VDroop is not a true offset feature like can be found on other brands of boards. https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=162779.0
Most folks around the industry recognize 1.350v's as the recommended limit for socket 2011 CPU's, so 1.344v's is fairly close to that anyway.
So when i set the voltage and the cpu multiplier i loose power saving features right?
Thanks for the reply

ITunes U Access Control Limits question

Is there any way to publish content to iTunes U and then limit access to my students such that they only see iTunes U content, and not music / movies, etc.?

Thanks for your response.
So, am I to assume faculty are freely able to upload to the public side of iTunes U?

Question for Günter please, anyone's thoughts appreciated – ADDT limits

About a year ago I build a simple social network type application with very basic features:
Users pages/Public pages
Friends
Comments
Blog
image uploads
etc
I stop working on it because I found PhpFox, well I have had little to no luck making it do what I want due to my lack of understanding of OOP.
My question is, do you know or can you think of any limitations that I should consider before putting any more time into my ADDT application?
I know(through reading quite a bit on security) that I’ll need to simplify my url’s with http rewrites, to keep mean people from hacking my url ID querie but what else should I consider for this simple application?.
You should know that since I built it with ADDT, its not modular, most of the code is per page(as Dreamweaver normally does) and I control all user limitations (like # of image uploads) with on the page “IF” statements.
I realize this is not great efficiency or ideal code writing, but it is the limitation for my skills until I learn OOP better. Then I can master PhpFox or Elgg.
I appreciate any and all comments before I waste any more time on my own social network application.
Thanks everyone

Hi zzipper7,
...until I learn OOP better. Then I can master PhpFox or Elgg.
IMHO this *is* the answer to your "can you think of any limitations" question
My question is, do you know or can you think of any limitations that I should consider before putting any more time into my ADDT application?
the main limitation to worry about is, that ADDT currently isn´t compatible with PHP 5.3. Other than this it´s clear that applications built with ADDT only provide comparatively basic "web 2.0" (aka AJAX) features except for a handful of components such as the form controls -- AJAX features which are supposed to provide additional functionality will have to be added manually, and it´s up to you (and your application´s "audience") to decide if you can live with this limitation or if your application should provide all those AJAX bells & whistles which would be hard to integrate into ADDT applications.
I know(through reading quite a bit on security) that I’ll need to simplify my url’s with http rewrites, to keep mean people from hacking my url ID querie...
Well, if I wanted, I could also change a "pretty URL" to something completely absurd and see if you - the developer - did provide a "oops, this page is not available" custom HTTP 404 error page
However, in case your ADDT driven application does what you want it do do, and in case a 3rd party application such as PhpFox is too hard to learn, you might still consider sticking with what you´ve built so far. In my opinion the real value of any web application is the degree of control which you, the developer, is able to exercise -- and in case you do know your ADDT driven application inside out while struggling with getting 3rd party scripts to work for you, I personally think the case is clear.
Cheers,
Günter

Want to begin overclocking

Hi forum members.
I want to begin overclocking and get the most out of my little but almighty Ti4200. So i have a few questions about overclocking. Firstly does the actual core and memory have overclocking limits or is the only limit because of overheating.
If the latter i then ask, what's the best VGA cooler out there? I will happily spend up to £40 ~ $50 as long as i get some good overclocking. I want to reach 330, 650, something like that.
Can anybody recommend something to me?
Ginster :D

I'm still using the cooler that came with the card, and just look at my scores! Click on the link in my signature, 12166 for a Ti4200 is pretty good overclocked 310/730 using the standard cooler!
But what i do have is a side panel fan which blows fresh air onto the AGP providing plenty of cool air. Now my case came with the side panel fan already installed. If you wanted a side panel fan then you may have to start drilling a hole. Just one suggestion.
If you do it right then you would save a lot of money, but do it poorly and you might wreck your case! ;(
Psymon :D

A64 Overclocking info from a bios engineer.

Im sure many of you know who Oskar Wu is. For those who dont, he is a bios engineer that recently left Abit and went to work at DFI. As far as I know he is working on their 250gb board.
Oskar has posted some information regarding overclocking limitations of the NF3 chipset, and a complete table of memory dividers for the a64. The posts were very informative, so I thought many of you would like to read them.
Appearently the sata issue is an nf3 chipset issue, not something which can or should be fixed by MSI. The same issue is said to occur on the DFI 250gb.
He also explains the source of cold boot problems for people with extreme htt overclocks.
Last he posted a complete table of memory dividers and another with max possible memory speeds corresponding to the dividers.
Good food for thought.
Some of this info I discovered myself, but his post still made me get off my ass and do some experimenting on my K8n.
Complete a64 memory divider table
Nforce 3 chipset overclocking issues

Yes i want one please

790FX overclocking limits questions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for