WHT should be deducted on payment amount instead of invoice amount

Hi All,
if any one help,
i am using 11i and issue is that, while matching PO (which is in USD) and making an invoice, but paying partially then WHT is deducted on invoice amount rather then payment amount.
if i match PO ( which is in functional currency i.e. PKR) then there is no issue and system calculate the tax on payment amount.
Please suggest!
thanks in advance...............
Regards
Asad
Edited by: 801240 on Dec 8, 2010 10:55 PM
Edited by: 801240 on Dec 8, 2010 10:55 PM

I havent worked on 11i But in r12 we can choose Apply Witholding tax "at Payment time" in payable Options
Navigation: Payables Responsibility>>Setup>>Optionn>>Payables Options>>Witholdin tax tab Select "At payment time" in Apply witholding tax area.
You said when invoice is of PKR its deducting on payment but on USD its deducting on invoice amount.
thus i rekon you have different options as per operating units
Send me your system option Screenshots on [email protected] then i will be able to help you better.
Edited by: Attiq on Dec 14, 2010 3:20 AM

Similar Messages

Gross invoice amount and net invoice amount

Hi Experts,
Can anybody tell me which is the gross invoice amount and net invoice amount field.
From which table can I get them?
I need to fetch Gross invoice amount and net invoice amount for both PObased invoice and non-PO based invoice against a check.
Which tables to hit for fetching them?
Regards,
Sangeeta.

Hi Sangeetha,
I hope table BSIP of field WRBTR can help you in getting the amount.
check it once.
Cheers!!
VEnk@
Edited by: Venkat Reddy on Nov 5, 2008 6:47 PM

Payment batch shows some invoice amount in rounding ....in AP

For a supplier a check of 1000$ is applied to 10 invoices containing standard and credit memo type. But the total amount for all the 10 invoices were 1400 including the standard invoice amount minus the credit memo amount. 400 were in the rounding line. There was no rounding account assigned or rounding rule applied and when checking the options for supplier, the calculation level: none and rounding: nearest for this supplier. Previously the supplier had no problem and is currently active. What might be the problem and how to solve to this issue? Please show some light on....thanks in advance....Andrea.
Message was edited by:
user455555

I am facing, the same problem. I would appreciate if you could mail me the solution if problem has be resloved on your side.
eagerly waiting for your response.
Thanks
[email protected]

Charged for purchase amount instead of rental amount

I requested a rental fot a movie but was charged for the purchase fee intead of the rental. How can I check and correct this?

On your computer's iTunes you can view the last 90 days purchases on your account via http://reportaproblem.apple.com - if you were charged for buying it then you can use that site to contact iTunes Support

Prepayment exceeded invoice amount, a refund is received. How 2 handle this

I made a prepayment of $100 to a vendor. The invoice I later received from the vendor was $70. The vendor then sent me a refund for the difference between the prepayment amount and the invoice amount (that is $30).
1) How can I treat this refund from the vendor in Oracle Payables?
2) Is the refund going to be a check sent to me?

Hi
Please follow the following steps:
1. Raise a standard invoice for $30 against the vendor and apply it to the prepayment (This is required as the prepayment invoice needs to be knocked off).
The accounting generated will be
Std invoice - Clearing A/c dr and liability a/c Cr.
Prepayment matching - liability a/c dr. and Prepayment A/c cr
2. Raise a credit memo for $30 against the vendor and receive a refund against the credit memo.
The accounting generated will be
Credit Memo - liability a/c Dr. and Clearing A/c Cr.
Refund - liability a/c cr. and Cash A/c dr
Note: The distribution account selected in both the standard invoice and credit memo should be the same (this is generally taken as a clearing account)
Another way (not generally recommended, and used in case you do not use cash management):
1. Raise a standard invoice debiting the cash account for $30 and crediting the liability account. Then apply the invoice to the prepayment invoice
Note: in this scenario, you select the cash account in the invoice distribution. But you will not be able to do cash management reconciliation
Hope this clarifies.
Vinit

Report for Differences in Invoice Amount and PO Amount

Hello,
Is there any standard report available in SAP to compare the differences in PO Amount andd Actual Invoiced Amount against that PO?
Regards,
Rohit Garg

Hello,
Try report MC$4 - Vendor Analisis: Purchasing Values.
I personally find it very useful.
Hope this helps!
KR,
Severina

Difference between Invoice amount and invoice amount on psting date

Hi Gurus,
I had run MC$G report which dispalys Vendor/Order Qty/PO value/Gr quantity/GR value/Invoice quantity/Invoice amount (Posting date) / Invoice amount
In this issue is Invoice amount Posting date and Invoice amount fields were not showing same value.
Could you please tell me the difference between these 2 ??
Reagr

No answer

TDS amount deduct on payment to vendor

Dear Expert,
i have done extended withholding tax configuration but i have faced problem when i use T.Code F-48 of vendor outgoing payment
TDS amount does not deduct payment but document is generated. requirement of customer TDS Amount deduct on payment.
Thanks & Regards.
Shailesh

Dear Expert
i have check it but every thing is fine when use t.code f-48 amount should not be deduct but when i use T.code F110 TDS amount automatically deducted . question is that why should not deduct on TDS in t.Code F-48.
Thanks
Shailesh.

Using "User Input" in "Collect Payments" instead of "Fixed Amount"

I've enabled "Collect Payments" on my form and I need to allow "User Input" instead of "Fixed Amount". I'm stuck... How do I do this?

Thanks Josh. I Appreciate it.
I did figure it out about 10 mins after I posted the question but thanks again man
Tom Ruley
Founder and President
The National Remember Our Troops Campaign, Inc.
P O Box 34093
Baltimore, Maryland 21221
Website: http://www.nrotc.org
     Email: [email protected]
    Phone: 410-687-3568
        Fax: 443-596-0730
Please remember our troops, our veterans and our military families. Try to do something... anything... to honor their service and sacrifice

F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount

Hi Experts,
We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     20.08.2009     20.08.2009     5,000.00-     1,295.12
20110225     1400010330     DZ     19     25.02.2011     25.02.2011     2,000.00-     1,295.12-
So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.

Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
Assignment Doc Num      Doc Type      Post Key    Net Amt         Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
2133004220     90005448     RV     01     3,707.02      3,305.71      401.31
2133015007     90020098     RV     01     7,836.68      6,737.25      1,099.43
2133016757     90022362     RV     01     10,521.31      8,603.87      1,917.44
2133137046     90187172     RV     01     11,367.68      0.00      11,367.68
2133137047     90187173     RV     01     1,354.09      0.00      1,354.09
2133137048     90187174     RV     01     1,739.82      0.00      1,739.82
2133137049     90187175     RV     01     994.57      0.00      994.57
20110419     90187176     RV     01     6.42      0.00      6.42
20110421     90187177     RV     01     44.94      0.00      44.94
20110425     90187178     RV     01     19.26      0.00      19.26
20081216     1400003657     DZ     19     3,421.86-     3,394.04-     27.82-
20081222     1400003706     DZ     19     1,000.00-     1,033.17-     33.17-
20090310     1400004396     DZ     19     420.51-     401.25-     19.26-
20090630     1400005319     DZ     19     786.13-     705.94-     80.19-
20090702     1400005349     DZ     19     596.04-     535.88-     60.16-
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     5,000.00-     6,295.12-     1,295.12-
20090824     1400005827     DZ     19     308.16-     295.32-     12.84-
20091027     1400006377     DZ     19     400.72-     375.04-     25.68-
20091215     1400006796     DZ     19     349.89-     337.05-     12.84-
20100608     1400008253     DZ     19     200.09-     189.39-     10.70-
20101019     1400009279     DZ     19     165.85-     155.00-     10.85-
20101019     1400009280     DZ     19     254.65-     238.00-     16.65-
20101019     1400009281     DZ     19     160.64-     157.00-     3.64-
20101130     1400009595     DZ     19     10,000.00-     5,440.92-     4,559.08-
How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario?

ER Contribution should not Deduct from EE SAL and not Display in Payslip.

Hi Experts,
I have Pension ER contribution Wage type:
1. That should not deduct from Employee SAL
2. Should not display in Payslip.
3. Amount store in RT.
What changes i should do in V_T512W_D table
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
We are maintaining the EE & ER contribution.
EE is working fine with all the validation & deducting from employee every month.
When we are handling ER contribution that amount is getting deducted from EE sal.
So we want to restrict ER contribution Deducting from employee sal and not to display in Payslip.
Figuring out how can we handle this thru Processing, Cumulating or Evaluation class.
Kindly advise
Regards
Raj

Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order

Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon

Clearing Customer down payment for down payment amount not equal to Customer Invoice amount

Dear All,
               Below process are posting Customer transaction directly via FI without SD cycle.
            Customer down payment = 102 INR
            Customer Invoice = 103 INR
While doing Customer clearing w.r.t Invoice system has cleared the down payment document but posted an open item in Customer account with clearing document number of value Rs 102 .
Concern:-
               1) How 1 INR difference will be countered , via receipt payment from customer from bank account ?
               2) In case we have defined tolerance limit of 5% for Customer and this come to be > 1 INR ,does SAP provide clearing Customer items
                   automatically via any Standard Customer clearing process based on rule defined ?
Pls suggest
Regards
MJ

Hi,
the information of the exchange rates used for down payments, is
stored in table TCURR ( exchange rates)
For the request down payment the actual exchange rate of table TCURR
or the rate of document header is taken.
When this down payment request is payed, also the exchange rate of
the actual day (TCURR) is taken.
That´s why the amount in the bank posting in local currency result
from translating the foreign currency amount at the current rate,
instead of resulting from the total of the local currency amounts
from the settled items.
Regards,
Attila

Payment terms using a fixed amount.

Is there a way to create a payment terms for a fixed amount instead of a percent discount. We have a term where the customer can take a 10.00 discount if paid within 30 days. All i can see is a percent of discount. This wont work cause the invoices will vary. Any Ideas?
Thanks

Hi Chad
I am not sure if what I propose may be of use - but try and see if you can utilise this:
In the Payment Term T Code OBB8 - there is a check box for Installment payments - you may have to create multiple payterms and assign acordingly - (FI settinsg in IMG)
what i would do is:
Term z10 = for 10 days to be used with a identified amount
Term z9 = for 10 days without any amount
and then use this installment utility - you may need to experiment on this to make it work as per your calculations -
cheers
nandu

Information message "Down Payment more than invoice amount"

Hi Experts,
After creating down payment request while making down payment,one information message shows in status bar "Down Payment amount is more than invoice amount"
can anyone tell me why that message popup everytime?
Thanks in advance
Sanjay

Dear,
Ideally this message should appear at the time F-54 transaction when down payment is greater or lesser than invoice amount.
But as you said it is appearing at time of F-48 so please check purchase order is entered and invoice has been done for that invoice with variances.
If query does not belong to any of above, please elaborate the scenario and also provide message number.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

WHT should be deducted on payment amount instead of invoice amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for