About gif and jpg

who can give me the website about gif and jpg format?
thanks guy.

This is a crosspost.
Chances are that you won't get a resonable response when you do that. Try reading How to Ask Questions the Smart Way. That will give you plenty of pointers on getting reasonable responses.
The response in your other post is a literal answer to you question, google is your friend.
For a direct answer, here's the the Jpeg FAQ. If what you are actualling requesting is "how do I use images in Java" take a look at the ImageIcon class, the javax.imageio package and search this forum for examples. You could also check the How to use Icons in the Java Tutorial.

Similar Messages

  • How can I invalidate everything except .gif and .jpg

    Hi
    I need to invalidate every page except the static objects as gif jpg. Can I create a rule that invalidates everything except gif and jpg.
    Thanks

    currently webcache invalidation does not have the expressive power to describe "anything but".
    however, you can give a list of rules in single invalidation message, each matching one type of pages, such as under particular directory, and with fixed suffix. and the whole list of criteria effectively achieves "anything but".

  • GIF and JPG become damaged

    I have a weird problem with some GIF and JPG images which I
    use in a RoboHelp project. They appear to get damaged, but I nor
    anyone else changes them. The bottom part becomes scrambled or
    entirely black. The strange thing is that when I put the project on
    my local hard disk, nothing happens, but when they are on the
    server (with RAID disk sytem), then trouble begins.
    Until now, nobody else who's wordking on the server reported
    damaged files, so it seems that I'm the only one so far.
    The trouble began on Sept. 11. Some projects I worked on
    since that day have problem files. Most projects are RoboHelp, but
    there's also a Word-project involved with a damaged JPG-file.
    Anyone?

    Hi Peter
    I've indeed already experienced that some RoboHelp projects,
    mainly large onces, are better run on the local hard disk.
    But this is a different problem I think. The project is run
    locally, which goes well, but when I copy it to the server disk for
    backup reasons, then some GIF-files get damaged after a while,
    while nobody opens the project on the server. When I copy the same
    files to another server's disk, then the files do not get damaged.
    I also have a Word project that has a JPG file that has got
    damaged.

  • Some GIFs and JPGs appearing with yellow "wash" when loading in Safari

    Hi,
    I've flicked through forums, google, and called my top graphics people but nobody can seem to help, or has ever even heard of, my issue.
    Here it is in a nutshell:
    Some GIFs and JPGs appear with a yellow "wash" when being loaded in Safari. I can confirm this is happening on 3 different Macs, and even on a PC running Safari.
    Safari 3.1.1 on Windows XP
    Safari 3.1.2 on Mac OSX 10.5.5
    Here's some examples of it occurring:
    http://staging.tomatosource.com.au/test/bad.jpg
    http://staging.tomatosource.com.au/test/bad.gif
    You might need to refresh the page in Safari a couple of times to see the flicker but it's there.
    I've tried:
    - resaving images with and without "progressive" and "interlaced"
    - a variety of different colour palettes
    - taking a screenshot of the image, putting back into Photoshop and resaving
    Has anybody seen this issue before? Unfortunately I can't go live with this site until I fix this very strange error.
    Any comments would be greatly appreciated!
    Cheers,
    Jase.

    Totally independently from your current problem, Safari is cr@p. Dump it.
    All Apple applications, from the Finder through Preview and iPhoto to Safari, assign Monitor RGB to ALL untagged images, even if they were created or saved in sRGB.
    The only current properly color-managed web browser is Firefox 3.0.1. Just keep in mind that you have to enable color management deep inside the guts of Firefox.
    See this existing thread in the Adobe Photography forum:
    Ramón G Castañeda, "Beware of using Adobe Web Galleries" #49, 14 Sep 2008 4:52 pm

  • Include large .gif and .jpg in pdf reports how?

    hi
    please can anyone enlighten me. i wish to include large(ish) graphics in pdf reports and this works if it is a small gif file of about 5Kb. anything over that fails.
    i have read the document in http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/hol08/apexprnt/apexprnt2_otn.htm and this works with extremely small gif files ONLY!!
    this is something i need to resolve urgently and would REVERE any solution.
    thanks

    Have the same problem too.
    When i'm creating xlst template larger than 40kb pdf generation fails.
    I damped request data recived by apex_fop.jsp and it shows that there is some (about 50) corrupted bytes between 40kb and 50kb.
    Same problem happens when there are to much data in xml, because it comes together in http post request.
    I suppose that there is some problems with utl_http, that corrupts some of report data. Or the post reques is not well-formed by apex.

  • Gif and JPG save for web file sizes in CS2 and CS3

    Gif 64 dittered default CS2=2.63KB CS3=4.83KB
    JPG CS2Low=1.42KB CS3=4.03KB
    JPG CS2Medium=1.90KB CS3=4.51KB
    JPG CS2High=3.38KB CS3=5.99KB
    Why? Is there any solution besides keep using CS2 for web?
    Thank's in advance.
    regards
    Fernando Bergamaschi

    Each of the three JPG files increases by the same amount -- 2.61 Kbytes. That sure sounds like some common header block is being added in CS3. Did you check the "Optimize menu" button next to "Preset" just to make double-sure "Include XMP" isn't enabled? Or some other setting like that? Or check both images in Bridge to see if something is being added.

  • GIF and sticky page size

    I have scanned (from HP N6310) a paper to a .TIF image. Original is A4 and resolution, as set in scanning software 300dpi. Photoshop (CS5) reports (for the .TIF fiile) pixel dimension as 2574*3540 pixels, page size as 21.8 * 29.9 cm and resolution as 300 dpi. I "Save for web and devices" as a GIF file. When I now retrieve the .GIF image in Photoshop it reports same pixel dimension but page size 91*125 cm and resolution as 72 dpi.
    This is a problem because .JPG images do not tend to change dimension and when I use Adobe Acrobat  (V9) to combine .GIF and JPG file ino one PDF document, the pages show at different sizes which looks funny and is very impractical.
    I try do fix this; retrive the GIF file in Photoshop and change page size back to A4 (21*29 cm) and resolution back to 300 dpi and Ctrl-S or Save. Does not help. If I retrive the file again in Photoshop it is still/back to 91*125 cm and 72 dpi. What is going on and what can I do about it????
    It seems Photoshop is the main offender but if I had found a way to change page size of a PDF file when "in" Acrobat it had probably solved the problem too. I run Windows 7.

    Let me rephrase my problem. I scan documents that are a mixture of pages with text, photos and diagrams. Black and white, greyscale or color. If I scan to PDF in color I get huge file sizes, even after Acrobat "Optimize". So I scan to the different pages to TIF bw, gray or color. I then save (Photoshop - Save for Web adn devices) to a compressed file format , JPG or GIF (I also tried PNG and the result is similar) depending on what sort of pictures there are. The result is OK (good looking and small file size) and I am able to import all singel page files into one PDF document. The only problem is that Photoshop and/or Acrobat seem to have their own idea about individual "page sizes". So in the final PDF different pages have different sizes. The problem is with GIF that does dispaly the wrong size already in Photoshop - unchageable but also it seems Acrobat import differently depending on color or bw (file size?). The whole thing is a mess and I have not been able to systematically track all variation. The only setting I found that could help is Photoshop - image - image size but that is where I got thsoe strange results.
    Jon

  • I have a pdf file 50 pages and want add to 1st page a logo (icon png or gif or jpg), well I have cs4

    I have a pdf file 50 pages and want add to 1st page a logo (icon png or gif or jpg), well I have cs4 master collection... how do it?

    what is "pinch"? what cs4 program(s)
    to use for this?

  • Using imageio to convert .gif to .jpg gives bad image

    Hi,
    I'm looking at the 1.4 javax.imageio API, and wrote a naive
    program to convert images from one format to another.
    It will read .gif, .jpg or .png and correctly write .gif and .png
    images, but when I try to write a .jpg from a .gif or .png
    the result is very black-looking - actually most of the colour
    is there but changed to a very dark level and red switched to blue
    for example. Presumably there is a reason that this doesn't work,
    or is it a bug? I would've though an exception would be thrown
    if the image types selected were incompatible.
    Also, how does one specify the JPEG quality setting?
    Thanks for any clues,
    Ed
    import javax.imageio.*;
    import java.awt.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import java.awt.image.*;
    public class ImageTest
    public static void main(String[] argv)
    try
    File f1 = new File(argv[0]);
    BufferedImage bi = ImageIO.read(f1);
    System.out.println("Read "+f1+" OK.");
    System.out.println("Image="+bi);
    File f2 = new File(argv[1]);
    String extn = f2.getName();
    extn = extn.substring(extn.lastIndexOf('.')+1);
    ImageIO.write(bi, extn, f2);
    System.out.println("Wrote "+f2+" OK format="+extn);
    catch (Exception ex)
    ex.printStackTrace();

    Interesting, the program works correctly on Windows 2000
    and Solaris Sparc; The .jpg file creating problem only
    occurs on my Solaris x86 machine.
    Ed

  • Creating a .gif or .jpg File

    I have written an eBook and am sending it for eBook publication and sale.
    One of the items required in the process before uploading the eBook is to provide:
    A. An image of the book cover. That image is now in Pages format and it contains text and a line art image. I need to convert that cover page to a .gif or .jpg format. How can I do this?
    B. The process also requires me to create 'Banners' of varying size. How do I create a Banner? All the material [text and art] are contained in the existing Pages document.
    Thank you,
    Leo
    <Edited by Moderator>

    Leo Gendernalik1 wrote:
    I have written an eBook and am sending it for eBook publication and sale.
    One of the items required in the process before uploading the eBook is to provide:
    A. An image of the book cover. That image is now in Pages format and it contains text and a line art image. I need to convert that cover page to a .gif or .jpg format. How can I do this?
    As far as I know, the only way to get a gif or jpg would be to make a screenshot.
    Maybe a PDF may fit your needs. If it does use the Print to PDF tool and print the 1st page.
    B. The process also requires me to create 'Banners' of varying size. How do I create a Banner? All the material [text and art] are contained in the existing Pages document.
    You may open a blank Numbers document and remove every table.
    You will get a huge blank surface which may be more than one meter in width.
    Copy objects from Pages and paste then on the Numbers sheet.
    Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE samedi 14 juin 2008 21:25:00)

  • Lightroom preview and JPG color difference.

    I'm a Photographer. Using Windows Vista and a brand new Dell 24" HC LCD monitor. Freshly calibrated with a MonacoOPTIX calibration kit. The profile generated is my default monitor profile. After calibration, I looked at some of my past photographic work and the colors looked very saturated to me. And the images all looked a bit brighter as well. I was working in an uncalibrated environment before so I figured thats why my pictures looked different. I shoot in RAW (Canon) and I always (and still do) export all of my work as sRGB.
    Yesterday I was working on a personal image and noticed my preview in Lightroom looks a bit different than the output in JPG. I verified my settings and I am outputting to sRGB. I'm expecting my preview and and the JPG to match almost exactly.
    See the screenshot here: http://lifesharephoto.smugmug.com/photos/256400141_Qy7np-L-1.jpg
    Notice the web version is much brighter and more staurated?
    Why would that be?

    Lou, you are using a non-managed browser. No matter how much you calibrate, it will not show you correct color, even if you use sRGB. This is because your monitor's gamut will differ slightly from sRGB. IE7 is not color managed, even though Microsoft promised it would be a long time ago. Currently only Safari is color managed. Firefox 3.0 beta can color manage if you enable it in the settings. There is unfortunately nothing you can do about it and you have to realize that even if you do everything right, your audience will see different colors. They will all cluster around what you saw in Lightroom though and you should absolutely not trust your IE7 display, even if you calibrate. Only your monitor has that specific response. Other people will see more saturated greens, or more saturated blues, or the opposite. There is no predicting. It will all cluster more or less around sRGB though.

  • How do I save a gif and send it to be viewed remotely?

    I'm trying to find a way to let a client view a gif that I've created for them. They use ancient pcs so can't use Preview in Mac OS. Any ideas?

    How will the client use the GIF?  If in a website, for instance, make a wee mock up and send them a JPG.  Or send the GIF and let them view in a web browser.

  • About bridge and extreme sloth

    Setup: Running win7-64bit, on i7 with 8GB ram, using tools from the cloud (trial)
    If this is the wrong forum for bridge there seems to be no forum for bridge specifically so posting here because I'm currently using bridge with PR.
    After downloading all the still and videos from days work, (5 videos and some 50+ stills plus the raw formats too), I'm trying to go through them, do some renaming and general organizing prior to loading videos into PR.
    At first I thought the new bridge had no right click functions, since when I attempt to right click an image or series of images nothing happens.  No menu is raised.
    But, finally the right click menu appeared and I was able to batch rename.  But every little chore, renaming, copying to somewhere else and even just moving around I find to be like wading through thick (deep) mud.
    I have PR and Bridge open along with Google earth but no other process is really processing data or doing other heavy lifting except bridge.
    Is 8gb of ram just too puny for the newest adobe tools, or are there steps I can take that will allow bridge to function at something approaching a reasonable speed?

    Curt Y wrote:
    In the lower right hand corner of Bridge you will see an arrow.  If it is spinning it means it is building the cache.  With CS6 it seems to lock up the application until finished, and seems to take longer than in CS5.  Thumbnails seem to build at the rate of about 1 second for every 30 meg.  So for a 300 meg video file it takes about 10 seconds, at least on my system.  Once the cache is built then things run at a good clip. 
    (PS - Processor speed: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q820  @  1.73GHz  1.73GHz)
    I see a pause in actions even after the arrow quits spinning (I guess you meant the lower LEFT side?).
    For example, once the arrow quits, if I click a top menu item (any one of them) I experience a second pause nearly as long as the arrow spin pause, before the menu opens.  Once that has happened then other menu items or the same one are normally fast to respond to a click.
    A further example of what seems to be uneccessary sloth happens if I minimize bridge or focus on a differnt app window such as this browser, then go back to bridge and click a menu item, I see a full 5/6 second pause before the menu is displayed. After having clicked and waited on one menu item, the rest respond normally to a click
    A quick look at what a session might look like:
    Click a directory in folder (or content) view (wait out a 4/6 second pause)
    Once the directory has opened press Ctrl-a to select all images (wait out a 4/6 second pause) click a new directory (wait out a 4/6 second pause) right click to get to `paste' or press Ctrl-v  (wait out a 4/6 second pause).
    Not really a workable flow (at least not for me).
    Curt Y wrote:[...]
    Also check your thumbnals.  I use embedded as they are small and fast.  If you use HQ, and generate 100% preview they can use a lot of disk space and would take longer to build.  Thumbnail options are two squares on 2nd line of tool bar on right hand side.
    Switching between "Always high quality" and "Prefer imbedded" I don't see any noticable change.  But that is on directories with fairly small content, like a mixture of 40 raw and 40 jpg stills at 6000x4000. Something like  1.35 GB of data. The *.jpg are about 10MB and the (raw) *.arw are about 24 MB.
    One really maddening thing I see here, is that when I've been focused on some other app window, then come back to bridge and right click on an image in a open directory, the pause for the right click menu to show up is a full 8 seconds.
    And that right click pause never goes away.  That is, if I right click andwait for the menu, then right click on the next image I have another 4/6 second pause for the menu to appear.
    Curt Y wrote:
    For some reason if you purge cache with Tools/cache/purge cache for xxx folder they seem to rebuild much faster.
    I don't see any noticable change here following that proceedure.
    Curt Y wrote:
    Bridge is more dependant on processor speed than RAM.
    How much processor speed is requred to not see these nasty pauses?
    On my current working machine, the repeated pausing in bridge has meant that its nearly useless.  Bridge ends up being saved only for mass rename or image processing chores.

  • Question about RAW to JPG file sizes

    Hello all, I have a question/concern in reference to file size changes when converting from RAW to JPG formats in PSE6. I've recently purchased a CANON 50D, and have started shooting in RAW format (actually RAW2+JPG). I have the CAMERA RAW 5.2 plugin and my workflow process is something akin to this:
    1. Separate all RAW and JPG images into their respective folders.
    2. Open the RAW folder in BRIDGE, and then open up a CR2 file. CR2 file is approx 15MB at this point, as reported in Finder.
    3. Perform various corrections in ACR52 to the file, then do as SAVE AS to a DNG file.
    4. Next step is to OPEN IMAGE, bringing it up in PSE6.
    5. Make any necessary corrections to the picture, and then do a SAVE AS to a new file name and folder, selecting JPG format.
    6. Selection MAX QUALITY from subsequent dialogue box, and SAVE.
    When the file is saved, its now down to a mere 2.1 or 2.2MB, and when viewing its properties (vs. the same file that came from camera in JPG format), its down from a 44x66" format, to somewhere around 4x6" and 240dpi.
    I've been doing some reading on this over the weekend, but cant explain away the severe loss in file size, and whether this is right, or if I'm doing something wrong in the process.
    Appreciate any advice or suggestions to help improve my work processes, and ultimately the final photos!

    Regarding your file size questions, have a look at this thread and see if it answers some of your questions:
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/741532/0
    > When the file is saved, its now down to a mere 2.1 or 2.2MB, and when viewing its properties (vs. the same file that came from camera in JPG format), its down from a 44x66" format, to somewhere around 4x6" and 240dpi.
    Dimensions and resolution are related and multiple combinations can be produced from the same number of pixels. For example, your 50D at maximum image size produces 4,752 by 3,168 pixels. This full-size image could be printed at:
    - 19.8 x 13.2 inches at 240 PPI
    - 47.52 x 31.68 inches at 100 PPI
    - 7.92 x 5.28 inches at 600 PPI
    As you can maybe see, talking about dimensions and resolution doesn't make much sense until you are ready to consider printing. Note also that I used "PPI" or Pixels Per Inch since this is the slightly more correct terminology. DPI or "Dots Per Inch" is usually a reference to how a printer lays down the ink drops onto the paper. Many printers actually put more "dots" on the paper than there are pixels. Many people and companies use DPI when they mean PPI.
    Now in your case you are apparently starting with an SRAW2 raw file. SRAW2 files from the 50D have a reduced number of pixels and are 2,276 pixels wide by 1,584 pixels high. At 240 PPI this would allow you to print the image at 9.9 by 6.6 inches. If you are ending up with something smaller than that, it means you have either re-sampled the image (changed the image so the same image is displayed with fewer pixels) or you have cropped the image.
    Hope that helps.

  • QuickView: How can I change the default full screen width of PDFs and JPGs

    Hello,
    I am very happy with the changes on the new OSX Lion.  But I have a disappointment form QuickView.  On Snow Leopard I will hit the "Option+Space" to QuickView files (mostly pdf and jpg) on full width and just scroll up and down with the mouse or the arrow keys.  Now in Lion, when I press "Option+Space" I get the file on full height.  This does not work for me because the information on screen is too small and I end up having to open the file on Preview.
    How can I change this settings so they are like on Snow Leopard?
    Thanks in advance.

    Not only can you set global values for each of the three columns, but you can also set unique column widths on a per community basis like this:
    .ptCommunity-1234 .columnOne { width: 635px; border-right:1px solid #CCCCCC; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 20px; }
    .ptCommunity-1234 .columnTwo { width: 240px; padding-top: 10px; padding-left: 8px;}
    You can see here my community #1234 has a wide first column and a more narrow column two and even puts a little solid line between them.
    It's all in the stylesheets on your imageserver at the path I mentioned earlier. Again, look at the experience definition object in your admin portal and look at the stylesheet name in the dropbox. The stylesheet name you see is mapped to the .css file using the community-themes.txt file in the same ...yadayada/common/public/css folder on the imageserver.
    If you have, lets say, a mainstyle1-en.css that only has about a dozen lines dictating only the few items you mentioned before - then it has been stripped at one time because the default that comes w/ an original install is huge and a great starting point. It even has style tips and snippets in comment blocks to tutor you through its gargantuan variety of options.

Maybe you are looking for