Absence quota should not get generate in Time Evaluation

Hi All,
For some employees we lock the payroll. But whenever we run the time evaluation every month employees  who are under lock payroll their absence quota is getting generated every month. It should not happen..
Please provide solution for this....
Regards,
Sita

Hi,
Due to some reasons  some employees payroll data was stopped for payment. for this they delimited in  infotype 0001 start date and payroll area to 90 ie. stop payment.
So whenever they run time evaluation every month through payroll area wise the employees who are under stop ment their quota is also getting generated. How to stop generating quota?
Regards,
Sita

Similar Messages

  • Absence quota 31 cant be accrued by time evaluation

    Hi
    while i run tim evaluation i get error like absence quota 31 cant be accrued by time evaluation,i configured generation rules & also written rule to update quota 31.Any suggestions where i went wrong??how to correct this error??
    Thanks&best regds
    Shaila

    Hi
    Actually i had written sub schema for this..bcoz this URL is eligible for those employees who are Cash processing officer & also based on personnel area we have to check wheter particular employee is Cash processing officer or nt if yes then only update 1day URL  to 2006 IT, if the employee is working on Public holiday..for updating i had written this PCR..ZMN1 Public holiday indicator(timetype), 31 is my quota group.
    HRS=1
    varstprsnt
    N
    Y
    HRS=DZMN1
    ADDDBZMN1
    UPDTQ31

  • TDS reversal entry is not getting generated at time of F-54

    Dear All,
    I have made down payment request  through F-47  transaction code  and down  payment made by Transaction code u2013F110 (instead of F-48)   and TDS is deducted at this point. There after I made invoice through MIRO / F-43 in which TDS is again deducted for whole invoice amount. I have cleared down payment through T.code F-54. But at this time TDS reversal entry is not getting generated and only customer account is credited and debited.
    So in short TDS is getting deducted at time down payment and at time of Invoice for their respective full value.
    Note: For TDS type on payment I have selected u201CCentral Invoice PROPu201D and we are not using business place and section code. Please help me.
    Appreciate all expertsu2019 help ASAP.
    Thanks ,
    Manas kumar

    Hai Manas,
    If ur not using business place how can u get remitance chalana thats why first u can configure the business plance. I think ur already posted some entries its correct? In this case u will run this t.code business place update the previous entries i.e.,  J1INPP  this is very useful to u
    Regards
    Madhu I

  • Excise Invoice should not get created without J1ID data for all material

    Dear All,
    We  have a requirement that excise invoice should not get generated unless chapter ID data is maintained for all the materials in the invoice.( when there is more than one item and chapter id is not maintained for all the items)
    At present excise invoice is getting generated for single item which has chapter ID maintained and  the items without chapter ID data are left out from the excise invoice. This results in an incorrect invoice.
    We want to ensure that excise invoice is not created, unless all the items in the billing document have chapter ID maintained.
    Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

    Dear Muralidhar, Lakshmipathi,
    Thanks for the solution.
    I have been able to solve the problem using the user exit mentioned by you.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

  • FI Doc not getting generated at the time of Asset GRN

    Hi,
    We have created Asset Purchase Order.
    At the time of GRN, FI Doc is not getting generated.
    What changes need to be required from MM side (in OBYC)
    Regards,

    HI PK,
    whether your PO Item have Single Account Assignment or it is Multiple Account assignment.
    Check Distribution in Accoun Assignment Tab at PO item level.
    If it is Single account Assignment, then Accounting Document will be generated at GR where if it is Distributed then, no Accounting Document will be generated.
    In your case, Probably it would be distributed. and as a result of this your PO Item is marked as 'GR non valuated'.
    Check its Delivery Tab. If it is the case, then need not worry as it is std practise. system will treated it as multiple account assignment and its valuation will only be carried out Invoice Verification level.
    Later on check the Material document also.
    Pls Note:
    If flag 'GR non-valuated' is set in the purchase order, the valuation is only executed through the invoice verification. This flag must be set if the purchase order has multiple account assignment.
    A valuated goods receipt for a purchase order with account assignment generates a posting line for the consumption account 'Account-assigned purchase order' (KBS) and for the GR/IR clearing account WRX.
    hope it address your issue.
    Regards,
    S Anand

  • Task activities not getting generated properly in BPEL

    I am using the Jdev 11g TP3 (from OTN). Installation went through fine. However I observed a interesting issue with HumanTask/BPEL and I was wondering if someone faced similar such problems before, if so, how to rectify the issue. Here is the description of the issue:
    1. Created a Empty SOA composite project
    2. Dragged and dropped BPEL Process in the component palette. Designed a Asynchronous process.
    3. Dragged and dropped a HumanTask. Did not expose as an composite. Designed a single approver workflow. In the project schema, choose the schema from BPEL input.
    4. Wired BPEL to HumanTAsk
    5. In the BPEL flow, I dragged the HumanTask to the flow. Everything appears to be correct. I clicked on "Ok" after associating with BPEL variable.
    Now when I examine the BPEL flow, a scope before the BPEL switch is empty. There are no BPEL activities generated. This is a very simple case of BPEL and HumanTask and I am not sure as to why the tasks not getting generated properly in BPEL flow.
    Has anyone experienced this issue or any ideas as to why this could happen?

    After going through the exercise several times, I finally found out the reason as to why the BPEL activities are not getting generated. In the Human task form for the title, since it is a fixed string in my case I put something like the one given below:
    Title : "APPROVE ORDER"
    When you have fixed string within double quotes it does not generate BPEL activities correctly. You can try and u will see the problem.
    My real question is should not throw proper error message when you try to drag and drop the HumanTask to BPEL flow.

  • Accounting documents not getting generated for mvt. type 221 Q

    Hi friends,
    When goods are issued for consumption for project accounting documents are not getting generated.
    I have tried with mvt. type 412 Q, 211 Q,
    by mvt type 412 Q, the stock is transfered to project stock, it shows the stock of material in project stock, by movement type 211 Q the project stock gets consumed. So at the time of consumption of consumption account should hit and relevent accounting document should get generated. this is not happenning.
    When i check material document and check for accounting document, message flashses that movement is not rrelevent for accounting.
    Can any one throw more light on this?
    Thanks and regards
    SAP MM

    Hi,
    Please check in PO item details Delivery tab. In that GR Non-valuated checkbox might be checked.Generally for account assignment category asset it is ticked.
    If you tick GR non-valuated check box then at the time of GR accounting document will not be created.Accounting document will be created only at the time of IR.
    or
    Have you mantained Chart of accounts.
    have you mantained Valuation area settings
    Transaction event key
    Valuation class settings.
    Check your material master data in accounting view have mantained Valuation class.
    Check your back ground settings OMWN.

  • Nohup.log files are not getting generated correctly

    hai,
    im a weblogic administrator. Here is my problem in weblogic. My partner has complained that nohup.logs are not getting generated properly. Like for every 5 mins a new nohup .log file is getting generated. But almost 4 to 5 logs are of 0 size and after that the 6 log file is very hug ( around MB). And the status of the managed servers is in FAILED state. When i checked the nohup logs, i can see "E297: Write Error In Swap File" and also the below error. But when i checked the disk space it is only 30 % full. Please suggest me something that can help me in this. Why is this behavior in the nohup.logs? have anyone faced anythign like this? Please help me.
    But after the recycle everything is fine. But i want to know what went wrong and why it got recovered after the recycle.
    <Feb 11, 2010 7:43:59 AM CST> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101246> <Error occurred while flushing HTTP log file for the Web server: wl38_managed1
    java.io.IOException: Disk quota exceeded.
    java.io.IOException: Disk quota exceeded
    at java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes([BII)V(FileOutputStream.java:???)
    at java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:260)
    at com.wily.introscope.agent.probe.io.ManagedFileOutputStream.write(ManagedFileOutputStream.java:423)
    at weblogic.utils.io.DoubleBufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(DoubleBufferedOutputStream.java:58)
    at weblogic.utils.io.DoubleBufferedOutputStream.flush(DoubleBufferedOutputStream.java:157)
    at weblogic.servlet.logging.LogManagerHttp$FlushLogStreamTrigger.trigger(LogManagerHttp.java:522)
    at weblogic.time.common.internal.ScheduledTrigger.run(ScheduledTrigger.java:243)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:118)
    at weblogic.time.common.internal.ScheduledTrigger.executeLocally(ScheduledTrigger.java:229)
    at weblogic.time.common.internal.ScheduledTrigger.execute(ScheduledTrigger.java:223)
    at weblogic.time.server.ScheduledTrigger.execute(ScheduledTrigger.java:50)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)

    according to error message, your partition size have not enough disk space from where you are running nohup command. check with df -kh.

  • Planned order not getting generated for FG

    Dear Experts,
    Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
    And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
    Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sampath
    Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

    Dear,
    In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
    Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
    Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
    So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
    Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
    Check and revert back.\
    Regards,
    Alok Tiwari

  • Excise invoice should not get created without PGI

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where the billing document is being generated by the customer without PGI after creation of outbound delivery for exports. (This is as per customer's requirement - Copy control maintained in VTFL for the same - copying requirements 11 )
    This creates a situation - excise invoice can be created without PGI - which creates problems for customer. This should not happen.
    Customer wants a check during the excise invoice creation - excise invoice should not get created if PGI has not been done.
    Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

    Dear Saravanan
    Two options are there
    -  in your existing routine itself, you can specify the control in such a way that unless the preceding document is PGId
    -  apply excise user exits like J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE to achieve the requirement.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Proforma invoice is not getting generated

    Proforma invoice not getting generated against replenishment delivery though configured relevance for proforma invoice & Pricing standard in the item category.
    Copy control are maintained absolutely  for Delivery document to Billing document.
    The system generating message the item is not relevant for billing.
    Can any one attend this on priority.

    Hi Rao,
    Check the item category configuration via VOV7 for the item category being used in the delivery. The billing relevance should be set to A.
    It should help you
    Regards,
    Pls Reward points if it helps

  • Application logs are not getting generated in OIM 9.1.0.2

    Hi guys,
    We have created schedulers in OIM using OIM api to create,modify and delete the users.All our schedulers working fine.and we are able to do all the opeartions quite some time back.But we are facing an issue where the logs not getting generated when we run the schedulers.But while creating/modifying/deleting users from OIM webconsole we are gettinng the logs.Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pavan.

    Have you configured the logger in your ljava class as well as log.properties of OIM

  • TDS is not getting reversed at time of down payment clearing

    Dear All,
    I have made down payment through F-48 transaction code and TDS is deducted at this point. There after i made invoice through FB60 in which TDS is again deducted for whole invoice amount. I have cleared down payment through T.code F-54. But at this time TDS reversal entry is not getting generated and only customer account is creditted and debitted.
    So in short TDS is getting deducted at time down payment and at time of Invoice for their respective full value.
    Note: For TDS type on payment i have selected " Central Invoice PROP ". Please help me.
    Appreciate all experts help ASAP.
    As well as this issue cropping up while working in Integration SAP HR.
    Regards,
    Rajasekar

    Hello rajasekar,
           Check the invoice whether business place and section code is there or not. If it is there then check the withholding tax type for payment posting are u choosen central invoice proportinate.
    Still the problem is coming, please revert back
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • SAP F&R - Order Proposals not getting generated

    Hi Experts,
    I am currently on SCM 5.0 system. For a location-product on uploading the consumption data, the forecast gets generated but no Order Proposals are getting generated at all. When I look at the Source of Supply, the delivery dates for the location-product are appropriately displayed.
    The scenario is basically Vendor -> DC -> Store i.e. V111 -> R601 -> R611 for the product FR11. The time series of supplying location is displayed for FR11-R611 in CADE while FR11-R601 is not displayed. I suppose, this may be, why the OPs are not getting generated. How do we generate time series for FR11-R601 i.e. for V111 (vendor) ?
    Also, When i try to run a location status check on R611, /FRE/FU_CL_FRP_SAFOUT_CRIT comes out with a fatal error with the remaining others in an INITIAL state. How do we resolve this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    Prashant

    Hi,
    I was able to solve both the issues with a change in the Forecasting Frequency profiles where the reference day for start week was on "FRP Location Activation Date". I changed it to Calendar date and checked the forecast and it worked with the Order proposals also generating. Also, the location status check out for the mentioned location was in "OK" state.
    Also, a second methodology applied to overcome the problem was to go to SAP Menu -> F&R Processor -> Administration, from there go to the location tab where the locations had a deactivation date of 31.12.2009. I extended the date and then there was no need to change the forecasting frequency profiles.
    Regards
    Prashant
    Edited by: Prashant Kedare on Mar 3, 2010 9:38 AM

  • F9N1 - Inbound FINSTA not getting generated

    Hi,
    When I execute F9N1, internal FINSTA are not getting generated..
    The application log shows current Accounts  being edited by end of day processing run
    What could be wrong and what can be done? Any idea..
    The next date in F9K3- Current Account is 11.02.2010
    The F9N1 run date is 12.03.2010
    The F9B1 date - Current date is 12.03.2010
                             New posting date - 15.03.2010
    I am in Development server and trying to add a new company code to the IHC set up. Where can I look into? The internal FINSTA are not getting generated..
    Regards,
    SAPFICO
    Edited by: SAPFICO on Mar 12, 2010 11:25 AM

    Ravi,
    I found the problem.
    Let me explain the whole process for the benefit of other consultants like me.
    Pre-requisites for generating FINSTA IDOC for any account in IHC:
    1. In the account (F9K2 - change account) go to 'Account Statements' TAB and ensure that the 'Next date' is the date on which you are trying to create the bank statement.
    2. In WE20 you should have created a partner profile for the Business Partner (Partner type GP) who is the Account holder.
    3. In this partner profile for the BP there should be a Outbound parameter for FINSTA (without Message code IHC and Message function FI) with basic type FINSTA01. The port used for this Outbound Parameter should be LOCAL.
    4. For the same BP there should be a  Inbound parameter for FINSTA with port and this port should be your client where the subsidiary's company code resides.
    Now when you run F9N1, it will create two FINSTA  IDOC's, one with LOCAL as port and for this the Partner will be your BP who holds the account in the IHC.
    Another FINSTA IDOC will have the House Bank as partner. This IDOC will be succesful only if you have created the account as a House Bank and Account ID in FI12 configuration for the subsidiary company code.
    Hope I have made myself clear.
    Kalyan

Maybe you are looking for