AC 5.3 - BW Reporting - Sizing

Hi All,
If we have a GRC server that is sized at 120 GB, how big does the BW server need to be sized to store the equivalent data set?
I can not find any onformation on this subject.
Regards
Simon

Great question. This has initiated a big discussion in our office.
We would like to know which of the following is correct:
a) SP09 will add a data mart component to the GRC Application Server, and the client user would need to install a front end Crystal Reports tool to analyse reports from the data mart on the GRC application server. (This does not require installation of a Crystal Server instance)
b) SP09 will install a custom connector in the GRC application server allowing data to be extracted to an external Crystal Server box to which users will connect and view reports. (This does require installation of a Crystal Server instance).
Thanks,
Babak

Similar Messages

Getting zero-sized reply error when running report from SQL query

Hi,
I have a Report from SQL Query in Portal. When I select Excel in Output Format and then run the report, it works properly, but when I select HTML in Output Format, the report works if the rows returned are not so many (I've been able to display the report for up to 701 rows), but when I try selecting a value from the LOV that selects many rows, I get the following error:
ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: <data suppressed>
The following error was encountered:
Zero Sized Reply
Squid did not receive any data for this request.
Any ideas on how to fix this? Why does the number of rows returned affect the report this way?
Thanks,
Lorena

Problem comes when any of the filter is applied in any one of the cases selected from the GUI.Do you mean that the problems only shows when you run the report in your browser via 9iAS?
Which version are you using?
Can you post the before report trigger?

Getting Zero Sized Reply error in report from SQL query

Hi,
I have a Report from SQL Query in Portal 3.0.9. When I select Excel in Output Format and then run the report, it works properly, but when I select HTML in Output Format, the report works if the rows returned are not so many (I've been able to display the report for up to 701 rows), but when I try selecting a value from the LOV that selects many rows, I get the following error:
ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: <data suppressed>
The following error was encountered:
Zero Sized Reply
Squid did not receive any data for this request.
Any ideas on how to fix this? Why does the number of rows returned affect the report this way?
Thanks,
Lorena

Hi,
I have a Report from SQL Query in Portal 3.0.9. When I select Excel in Output Format and then run the report, it works properly, but when I select HTML in Output Format, the report works if the rows returned are not so many (I've been able to display the report for up to 701 rows), but when I try selecting a value from the LOV that selects many rows, I get the following error:
ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: <data suppressed>
The following error was encountered:
Zero Sized Reply
Squid did not receive any data for this request.
Any ideas on how to fix this? Why does the number of rows returned affect the report this way?
Thanks,
Lorena

Sizing gif image in report

We have a number of reports that have been converted from BO v5 that had a logo at the top of the first page. Having converted them to Webi, we cannot now get the logo to display properly. For example, if one of the original logo files is examined in a graphics package it is sized at 616 x 284 pixels and when inserted into a Word or Excel document measures approximately 4cm wide. However, when the same image is inserted into a Webi document, and the 'autofit width' and 'autofit height' parameters are selected, it is approximately 16cm wide. We have tried adjusting the 'width' & 'height' paramaters to be the same size as the original image file, but that just resizes the cell containing the image and causes only part of the image to be displayed. We have also tried resizing the image in a graphics package first, and although this renders it nearer the correct size, the image quality is lost.
Does anyone have a solution for this problem?

Hi,
As far as i know these are all the formatting problems due to migration from 5x or 6x to XI. The problem you are facing is also due to migration. Try deleting the image and reinsert it.
I think its not great suggestion but try it and see.
Thanks,
SK.

Suite on Hana sizing report

We ran the sizing report (/SDF/HDB_SIZING) as per note 1872170 in our R3 4.7 SAP system. We got our output, but bugs me is the number of tables reported with an error:
Number of tables successfully analyzed:                                 20,702
Number of tables partially analyzed:                                         0
Number of tables with error:                                            21,733
Is this normal?
The warning we got was the following:
WARNING! Some tables have no statistics.Check if the sizes of tables with error
code "1-" could influence the sizingresult significantly.
Error estimation in % due to tables with errors :                            0
Below is a couple of the tables that reported with an error:
TABLES NAMES                   ERROR MESSAGE/CODE (See FAQ)
/ASU/CONTENT                   1-
/ASU/CONTENTATTR               1-
/ASU/CONTENTNT                 1-
/ASU/CONTENTNV                 1-
/ASU/CONTENTNVT                1-
/ASU/CONTENTNVT2               1-
/ASU/CONTENTT                  1-
/ASU/CONTENTV                  1-
I checked in SM36, and all the standard jobs are running. Any input will be greatly appreciated.

I spot checked 20 tables in the list with SE16 for the number of entries, and all of them had 0 number of entries so it seems legit, but I still would like to know if other people experienced the same.

Sizing Parameters for improved Crystal Reports environment

Similar to APS splitting option, what sizing parameter should i consider specific to Crystal Reports 2013 in 4.1 environment
(80%) of their total number of objects are Crystal. All of the reports are direct on top of DB.
Which Memory parameter needs to be tweaked in Crystal Processing/Adaptive Job or Cache server?
Thanks,
Tilak

You have to limit option in Crystal Processing server - Limit this option to may be 100k records -Database records read when previewing and refreshing .
max cache size- in cache server.
If you see any issues while running the crystal reports, you can tweak the option based on the issue- Java heap size, perm size.

SGA Sizing + OEM Issue+AWR reports

Hi Techies,
There is small application(Billing Application) running on Laptop. (Windows Vista 32 bit , RDBMS 10.2.0.3.0.)
1- We have increased the SGA_MAX_SIZE. Thought of Increase 700 M. Once we did the changes it has taken effect as 702 MB Allocated to SGA_MAX_SIZE. The same thing happened, while changing the SGA_TARGET Parameter.(After changed the parameter, it has added up 2MB extra).May I know the reason why the 2MB has added while changing the parameter.
2- OEM is not working , When it prompting for the Host User name and password, it won't accept the username and passowrd which I am used to Login into the Laptop.
3- After the generated the AWR reports, how to approach the finding , though it has many more data . Please help
Thanks,
Tippu

Hi
If you're looking to performance tune your database, run the AWR report - preferably starting and ending at snapshots during which times there was a fair amount of activity, then post the section 'Top 5 Timed Events' here and I will point you in the right direction :-)
If OEM is still not working, you can manually take snapshots and generate AWR reports from sqlplus.
Take a manual snapshot:
BEGIN
DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY.CREATE_SNAPSHOT ();
END;
Produce an AWR report:
@?/rdbms/admin/awrrpt.sql
Cheers,
Andreas

How to ... Sizing SAP BI for reporting ?

Hi,
Is there any SAP tool, to size server, how many saps... necesary for end user reporting ?

Hello,
you can use the quicksizer at http://service.sap.com/quicksizer
It can give you at least some rough estimation of the required hardware.
Best regards,
Ralf

Question on sizing Webi reports

Is there a way to make a wwebi report fit the user's viewing window. There are so many different screen resolutions being used, that it's hard to get the report size correct for everyone.
My reports tables fit nicely on A3 paper size, and Adobe Reader nicely resizes to standard letter size paper for printing, this works great.
Can Webi reports be setup to be viewed so that the report fits inside the users viewing window, rregardless of size and screen resolution ?
Edited by: Warren Shellshear on Feb 9, 2009 5:46 PM

No. Your question is not obtuse at all.
I don't believe it's possible to avoid the scroll bars; at least I can't think of a way to do this without extensive customization.

Report performance while creating report on BEx

All all!
I am creating a report on BOE 4.0 on top of BEx connection as a source. I have developed reports on top of universe in the past and i know that if we keep calculations on reporting end it hampers the report performance. Is this the same case with BEx? if we are following the best practices is it ok to say that we should keep all heavy calculations/ aggregation on BEx or backend for better report performance.
Can you guys please provide your opinion based on your experiance and knowledge. Any feedbacks will help! Thanks.

Hi,
Definitely best-practice to delegate a maximum of CKF to the Cube where possilble, put RKF in the BEx query, and Filters too.
also, add Default Values to your Variables (this will speed up generation of the bics transient universe)
also, since Patch2.10, we are seeing some significant performance improvements reducing 'document initialization' and 'time to prompts' by up to 50% (step such as these often took 1.5 minutes, even on sized systems)
Also, make sure you have BW corrections like this implemented: 1593802 Performance optimization when loading query views
In the BusinessObjects landscape - especially with BI 4.0 - it's all about Sizing and Tuning . Here is your bible the 'sizing companion' guide : http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000738725&_OBJECT=011000358700000307202011E
Pay particular attention to BICSChunkSize registry settings
Also, the -Xmx JVM Heap Size for the Adaptive Processing Server that is running the DSL_Bridge service.
Regards,
H

"Memory Sizing" error on Sun Fire V65x

Hello.
I have some trouble with my old Sun Fire V65x and i hope that you guys can help me out.
I had 2,5GB RAM installed in my server, working flawless. 2 x 256MB and 2 x 1GB modules. 256-modules in Bank 1 and 1GB´s in Bank 2.
To get rid of the boot up warning of wrong memory configuration i moved the 2 1GB modules to bank 3 (as stated in the manual) but that was when the problem started.
In this configuration the server won't go to POST, i tried moving the 1GB modules around between bank 1, 2 & 3 without any result.
The server will not go to POST. No beeps, no nothing. When turning the server on line it starts up, the fans starts running on at maximum speed and that's all, no picture and no POST and the system warning LED turns to red. After a couple of minutes in this state the fans slow down for a couple of seconds and then back to 100% (repeating cycle)
The POST diagnostics LEDs at the back of the main board indicates POST code 13h, "Memory sizing". The main board does not report any defective DIMMs, also worth mentioning is that the 2 256MB DIMMs are working flawlessly in all banks.
I have tried:
Resetting the memory config in BIOS (using the 2x256 DIMMs and then installing the 2 1GB modules.
Moving the memory modules around between different banks, both alone and with the 2 256MB DIMMs present.
Clearing the CMOS settings.
Searching manuals and Google for hours without answer to my problem or what "memory sizing " means in this situation.
System:
Sun Fire V65x
1 CPU
If anyone know the answer to my dilemma and are willing to help me, i would be really grateful.
Sadly i do not have the possibility to test the memory modules in another system.
Best regards. Erik Järlestrand, Sweden.

Hardware. A reboot will probably not do anything. From what I can tell, it's a CPU cache problem. If you do anything, shut the system down completely, turn the power off for a minimum of 20 seconds to let any residual electricty go away, the turn it back on. If the problem returns, you'll most likely need to either get a new CPU module or a new V100. I don't know if the CPU can be removed from the V100 motherboard, but since there are jumper settings for the speed I would assume that you can.

XML Publisher Report Fails While using Pivot Table in R12 Oracle EBS

Hello All,
Need your help. I am trying to create a report with a Pivot table. I have created the .rtf file using the Oracle BI Publisher Template Builder for word 10.1.3.4.1. the data comes correctly in preview but when i register it in EBS and run the concurrent program it competes in warning and no output is displayed.
The error message looks like as follows.
[9/3/10 4:03:17 PM] [19934:RT444621] Executing post-processing actions for request 444621.
[9/3/10 4:03:17 PM] [19934:RT444621] Starting XML Publisher post-processing action.
[9/3/10 4:03:17 PM] [19934:RT444621]
Template code: XXECOHCGEN
Template app: XXECO
Language: en
Territory: 00
Output type: EXCEL
[9/3/10 4:03:31 PM] [19934:RT444621] Output file was found but is zero sized - Deleted
[9/3/10 4:03:31 PM] [UNEXPECTED] [19934:RT444621] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:45)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:599)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.invokeNewXSLStylesheet(XSLT10gR1.java:611)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.transform(XSLT10gR1.java:239)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper.transform(XSLTWrapper.java:182)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:1044)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:997)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:212)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor.createFO(FOProcessor.java:1665)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor.generate(FOProcessor.java:975)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.runProcessTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:5936)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3459)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3548)
     at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.XMLPublisherProcessor.process(XMLPublisherProcessor.java:302)
     at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.OPPRequestThread.run(OPPRequestThread.java:176)
Caused by: oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XPathException: Namespace prefix 'crosstab' used but not declared.
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.reportException(XSLProcessor.java:806)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.newXSLStylesheet(XSLProcessor.java:571)
     ... 17 more
would appreciate some pointers to fix this issue.
Regards,
Abhijeet K
Edited by: Abhijeet K on Sep 3, 2010 8:10 AM

HI, was there a Solution Ever found for this post other than the Workaround.
I am at the Same issue now, Any Valuable inputs will Help me finish my Report ASAP, becos currently this is my only Show stopper
we have Oracle Apps R12 realease 12.1.3 we use XMLpublisher built in R12
The issue i have is .
I created a XMLPublisher Report using PIVOT TABLE i would like to have my output to be in Excel, When i Preview it works fine, when i execute via Concurrent Program it gives the Following Log file
XXTPC Custom Application: Version : UNKNOWN
Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
TPC_ITEM_COUNT_RPT module: TPC ITEM COUNT RPT
Current system time is 25-JUN-2012 11:00:39
XDO Data Engine Version No: 5.6.3
Resp: 21676
Org ID : 101
Request ID: 2149483
All Parameters: report_name=RUN BY ORDER TYPE:org_name=HQF:org_choice=TPC US:item_selection=1001:order_type=k-us:pstatus=entered,waved,notwaved,shipped:transit_days=:first_receipt_date=01-jun-2012:last_receipt_date=22-jun-2012
Data Template Code: TPC_ITEM_COUNT_RPT
Data Template Application Short Name: XXTPC
Debug Flag: N
{first_receipt_date=01-jun-2012, org_choice=TPC US, item_selection=1001, report_name=RUN BY ORDER TYPE, pstatus=entered,waved,notwaved,shipped, org_name=HQF, last_receipt_date=22-jun-2012, order_type=k-us, transit_days=}
Calling XDO Data Engine...
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
End of log messages from FND_FILE
Executing request completion options...
Output file size:
29148
------------- 1) PUBLISH -------------
Beginning post-processing of request 2149483 on node HQTERPAS1LX at 25-JUN-2012 11:00:51.
Post-processing of request 2149483 failed at 25-JUN-2012 11:00:52 with the error message:
One or more post-processing actions failed. Consult the OPP service log for details.
------------- 2) PRINT   -------------
Not printing the output of this request because post-processing failed.
Finished executing request completion options.
Concurrent request completed
Current system time is 25-JUN-2012 11:00:52
I have requested my DBA to get me the OPP file..
Thanks in advance for any solution.

Performance issue in DB need help with analysing this ADDM report

Hi,
My environment:
Os: RHEL5U3 / 11.1.0.7 64 bit / R12.1.1 64 bit
Issue:
Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instance. Normally the issue will occur 5 to 10 minutes occasionally per day. At the time of issue we not able to access the EBS application its taking time to load. But backend all the oracle, listener and apps services are up and running. No locks at table and session level. Cpu and memory usage is normal.
We have monitored using "Enterprise Manager" for this issue and we found the wait session present more in Active session tab. At this time EBS application is not able access its loading too time. After some time the in Active session tab the wait session came normal and when we try to access the EBS application its working fine.
We try to find the cause of the issue by running addm report. But am not able to understand what its says. Kindly suggests me
ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_42656'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 14754 to 14755.
Time period starts at 17-APR-12 11.00.22 AM
Time period ends at 17-APR-12 12.00.33 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'PRD' with DB ID 1789440879.
Database version 11.1.0.7.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance PRD, numbered 1 and hosted at
advgrpdb.advgroup.ae.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 18674 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was 5.17.
Summary of Findings
Description Active Sessions Recommendations
Percent of Activity
1 Top SQL by DB Time 3.43 | 66.33 5
2 Buffer Busy 2.52 | 48.81 5
3 Buffer Busy 1.39 | 26.81 2
4 Log File Switches .91 | 17.56 1
5 Buffer Busy .56 | 10.87 2
6 Undersized SGA .38 | 7.37 1
7 Commits and Rollbacks .28 | 5.42 1
8 Undo I/O .18 | 3.53 0
9 CPU Usage .13 | 2.57 1
10 Top SQL By I/O .11 | 2.21 1
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Top SQL by DB Time
Impact is 3.43 active sessions, 66.33% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is 1.59 active sessions, 30.8% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" for possible
performance improvements.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
(R.OPS_INSTANCE =
decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
= C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
:q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
(R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
R.status_code NoWait
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was executed 4686 times and
had an average elapsed time of 1.2 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 85% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
Rationale
Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
class "Configuration" accounted for 9% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
Recommendation 3: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.91% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" for possible
performance improvements.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" was executed 266 times and had
an average elapsed time of 7.6 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 86% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
Rationale
Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
class "Configuration" accounted for 7% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
Finding 2: Buffer Busy
Impact is 2.52 active sessions, 48.81% of total activity.
Read and write contention on database blocks was consuming significant
database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is 1.42 active sessions, 27.44% of total activity.
Action
Trace the cause of object contention due to SELECT statements in the
application using the information provided.
Related Object
Database object with ID 34562.
Rationale
The SELECT statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was significantly
affected by "buffer busy" waits.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
(R.OPS_INSTANCE =
decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
= C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
:q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
(R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
R.status_code NoWait
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Recommendation 1: Schema Changes
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, .62% of total activity.
Action
Consider rebuilding the TABLE "APPLSYS.FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS" with object
ID 34651 using a higher value for PCTFREE.
Related Object
Database object with ID 34651.
Rationale
The UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "cqc5crhxxt36t" was significantly
affected by "buffer busy" waits.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID cqc5crhxxt36t.
UPDATE FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS FLRF SET END_TIME = SYSDATE WHERE
FLRF.LOGIN_ID = :B2 AND FLRF.LOGIN_RESP_ID = :B1 AND FLRF.END_TIME IS
NULL AND (FLRF.FORM_ID, FLRF.FORM_APPL_ID) = (SELECT F.FORM_ID,
F.APPLICATION_ID FROM FND_FORM F, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE F.FORM_NAME
= :B4 AND F.APPLICATION_ID = A.APPLICATION_ID AND
A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B3 )
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 4: Log File Switches
Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
Log file switch operations were consuming significant database time while
waiting for checkpoint completion.
This problem can be caused by use of hot backup mode on tablespaces. DML to
tablespaces in hot backup mode causes generation of additional redo.
Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
Action
Verify whether incremental shipping was used for standby databases.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Configuration" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.63% of total activity.
Finding 5: Buffer Busy
Impact is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
A hot data block with concurrent read and write activity was found. The block
belongs to segment "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" and is block 243489 in file 36.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
Action
Investigate application logic to find the cause of high concurrent read
and write activity to the data present in this block.
Related Object
Database block with object number 37562, file number 36 and block
number 243489.
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" spent significant time on
"buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "326up1aym56dd" spent significant time on
"buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 326up1aym56dd.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Recommendation 2: Schema Changes
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
Action
Consider rebuilding the TABLE "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" with object ID 37562
using a higher value for PCTFREE.
Related Object
Database object with ID 37562.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 6: Undersized SGA
Impact is .38 active sessions, 7.37% of total activity.
The SGA was inadequately sized, causing additional I/O or hard parses.
The value of parameter "sga_target" was "4096 M" during the analysis period.
Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .12 active sessions, 2.33% of total activity.
Action
Increase the size of the SGA by setting the parameter "sga_target" to
4608 M.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.51% of total activity.
Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time.
Impact is 0 active sessions, .03% of total activity.
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 7: Commits and Rollbacks
Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations
were consuming significant database time.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O to the
online redo log files.
Rationale
The average size of writes to the online redo log files was 163 K and
the average time per write was 68 milliseconds.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Finding 8: Undo I/O
Impact is .18 active sessions, 3.53% of total activity.
Undo I/O was a significant portion (26%) of the total database I/O.
No recommendations are available.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than
expected.
Impact is .08 active sessions, 1.46% of total activity.
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Finding 9: CPU Usage
Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
Time spent on the CPU by the instance was responsible for a substantial part
of database time.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
Finding 10: Top SQL By I/O
Impact is .11 active sessions, 2.21% of total activity.
Individual SQL statements responsible for significant user I/O wait were
found.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .11 active sessions, 2.22% of total activity.
Action
Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID b3pnc5yctv2z5.
INSERT INTO ZX_TRANSACTION_LINES_GT( APPLICATION_ID ,ENTITY_CODE
,EVENT_CLASS_CODE ,TRX_ID ,TRX_LEVEL_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_ID ,LINE_CLASS
,LINE_LEVEL_ACTION ,TRX_LINE_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_DATE
,LINE_AMT_INCLUDES_TAX_FLAG ,LINE_AMT ,TRX_LINE_QUANTITY ,UNIT_PRICE
,PRODUCT_ID ,PRODUCT_ORG_ID ,UOM_CODE ,PRODUCT_CODE ,SHIP_TO_PARTY_ID
,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_ID ,BILL_TO_PARTY_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_ID
,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID
,SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID ,SHIP_FROM_LOCATION_ID ,BILL_TO_LOCATION_ID
,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,HISTORICAL_FLAG
,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CODE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_DATE
,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_RATE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_TYPE
,TRX_LINE_MAU ,TRX_LINE_PRECISION ,HISTORICAL_TAX_CODE_ID
,TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION
,LINE_INTENDED_USE ,PRODUCT_TYPE ,USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS
,ASSESSABLE_VALUE ,INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE ,ACCOUNT_CCID
,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,TRX_LINE_NUMBER
,TRX_LINE_DESCRIPTION ,PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION ,USER_UPD_DET_FACTORS_FLAG
,DEFAULTING_ATTRIBUTE1 ) SELECT :B4 ,:B3 ,:B2
,PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID ,:B1 ,PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID ,'INVOICE'
,NVL(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE,'UPDATE') ,'ITEM'
,NVL(PRL.NEED_BY_DATE, SYSDATE) ,'N' ,NVL(PRL.AMOUNT,
PRL.UNIT_PRICE*PRL.QUANTITY) ,PRL.QUANTITY ,PRL.UNIT_PRICE
,PRL.ITEM_ID ,(SELECT FSP.INVENTORY_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
FINANCIALS_SYSTEM_PARAMS_ALL FSP WHERE FSP.ORG_ID=PRL.ORG_ID)
,(SELECT MUM.UOM_CODE FROM MTL_UNITS_OF_MEASURE MUM WHERE
MUM.UNIT_OF_MEASURE=PRL.UNIT_MEAS_LOOKUP_CODE) ,MSIB.SEGMENT1
,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID ,PV.PARTY_ID ,PRH.ORG_ID
,PV.PARTY_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID
,PRL.DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID ,(SELECT HZPS.LOCATION_ID FROM
HZ_PARTY_SITES HZPS WHERE HZPS.PARTY_SITE_ID = PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID)
,(SELECT LOCATION_ID FROM HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS WHERE
ORGANIZATION_ID=PRH.ORG_ID) ,PRL.VENDOR_ID ,PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,NULL
,NVL(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, :B9 ) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_DATE,
SYSDATE) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE, :B8 )
,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_TYPE, :B7 )
,FC.MINIMUM_ACCOUNTABLE_UNIT ,NVL(FC.PRECISION, 2) ,NULL
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY, NULL),
NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_CATEGORY, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION,
NULL), NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.LINE_INTENDED_USE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_TYPE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS, NULL),
NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.ASSESSABLE_VALUE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(:B6 , 'REQIMPORT', PRL.TAX_NAME,
DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE,
NULL), NULL ) ) ,NVL((SELECT PRD.CODE_COMBINATION_ID FROM
PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PRD WHERE PRD.REQUISITION_LINE_ID =
PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND ROWNUM = 1), MSIB.EXPENSE_ACCOUNT )
,PV.VENDOR_ID ,PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,PRL.LINE_NUM ,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION
,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION ,(SELECT 'Y' FROM DUAL WHERE :B6 = 'REQIMPORT'
AND PRL.TAX_NAME IS NOT NULL) ,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL PRH, PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL PRL,
ZX_LINES_DET_FACTORS ZXLDET, PO_VENDORS PV, PO_VENDOR_SITES_ALL PVS,
MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSIB, FND_CURRENCIES FC WHERE
PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = :B5 AND PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID =
PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND ZXLDET.APPLICATION_ID(+) = :B4 AND
ZXLDET.ENTITY_CODE(+) = :B3 AND ZXLDET.EVENT_CLASS_CODE(+) = :B2 AND
ZXLDET.TRX_LEVEL_TYPE(+) = :B1 AND ZXLDET.TRX_LINE_ID(+) =
PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID AND PV.VENDOR_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_ID AND
PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID AND
MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID(+) = PRL.ITEM_ID AND MSIB.ORGANIZATION_ID(+) =
PRL.ORG_ID AND FC.CURRENCY_CODE(+) = PRL.CURRENCY_CODE AND
NVL(PRL.MODIFIED_BY_AGENT_FLAG, 'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CANCEL_FLAG,
'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') <> 'FINALLY CLOSED' AND
PRL.LINE_LOCATION_ID IS NULL AND PRL.AT_SOURCING_FLAG IS NULL
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5" was executed 3 times and had
an average elapsed time of 138 seconds.
Rationale
Average time spent in User I/O wait events per execution was 137
seconds.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
period.
Regards
Athish

Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instanceFor production issues, please log a SR.
Was this working before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please see these docs.
AutoInvoice Performance Issue When Processing Tax [ID 1059275.1]
R12 : System Hangs When Attempting To Save Blanket Release After Applying Patch 11817843 [ID 1333336.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Performance issue webi report-BOXI3.1

Hi,
We have a requirement for a report where we will give user a set of objects (26 u2013 31) to do analysis using interactive viewing feature. Here we are facing severe performance issues and memory issues as the data that we are calling is huge( around 6 million records). At the report level we will be summarizing the data.
No of rows in the report is depending on the no of objects.
Mode of view : Interactive view.
Note:
1. Objects which are using in conditional level those have indexes.
2. No of report level variable are two.
3. Version of Business objects: BOXI3.1
4. OS: Sun Solaris
Please let me know if there are any means by which the memory requirements for the report can be minimized/ performance of the report can be improved.
Thanks,
Subash

Subash,
At the report level we will be summarizing the data ... any means by which the memory requirements for the report can be minimized/ performance of the report can be improved
Is there any way that you can summarize this on the database side versus the report level? The database should be sized with memory and disk space properly to handle these types of summarizations versus expecting the application to perform it.
Thanks,
John

Printing from HTML rendered page assume bigger margins than defined on the report

Hello!
I have a report with PageSize and InteractiveSize of 29,7cm x 21cm and Margins of 2cm each.
Body of report is 25cm width.
When rendered in report server and then try to print it I get some blank pages because it changes print margins to 2,032cm each!
I tried other margin sets like 5cm, and it changes to 5,08cm.
If I set margins to 1,5cm it changes to 1,4986cm.
I tried to print to a different printer and does the same.
Does anyone knows why this happens and if I can control it?
Thanks in advance.
Carla Baptista

I'm running OS X 10.5.4 on a Mac Pro with 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon & 4 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM Memory (I installed the latest security update this past week).
I updated to ACR 4.5 (thru adobe tech help) after installing the security update. I've been using Epson driver 6.10- beta version for Mac OS X 10.5 for several months with no problems.
Seems to me that ACR 4.5 previews stated that some printing issues would be fixed with this upgrade, along with support for more cameras, and support for linking to CS3 from LR2.0.
It is possible that the security update affected printing from Adobe CS3. Several months ago there were serious problems printing from Aperture & Lightroom that were "fixed" with an OS X security update. Some of those problems were printing size & orientation problems, as well as incorrect color. I checked printing after this latest security update, but not with custom sizes.
I guess I'll have to do some further investigating to determine what exactly is causing the current problem & find a workaround. I'm not a computer expert - I'm a photographer. And I'm getting weary of having to find fixes for things that should have been handled by the development staff for the various software products that I'm using - plus, it gets expensive when paper and ink are wasted - very expensive when printing to large custom sized paper. And very bothersome when you cannot depend on what you see in the preview window as to print size nor orientation.
Anybody else out there with similar problem with the latest upgrades?

AC 5.3 - BW Reporting - Sizing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for