Account Based Profitability Analysis

Hi,
I am mapping characteristic fields of account based profitability analysis. I have been given fields such as KMLAND to map into BI fields.My question is how do i map the key figures. What fields in account based profitability analysis are key figures, are they value fields? Do i need a list field names of value fields to map it into BI.Some one mentioned something about cost elements.
Thanks
TJ

Hello Tee Jay,
Cost Element is a key field in ECC. That means its char. in BW. What are the infoobjects that you have in your DSO or cube n BI.
Do you have 0COSTELMNT or 0GL_ACCOUNT? If so, then you map Cost element field from SAP to one of the above char. in BW.
By Revenue, do you mean a value field in R/3? If so, it will have to be mapped to key figure in BI.
Hope that helps.

Similar Messages

  • Need info for COPA (Cost based profitability analysis)- Archiving objects

    Hi All,
    SAP have introduced new 2 Archiving objects COPAA_xxxx, and COPAB_xxxx instead of the old archiving object COPA1_xxxx.
    Where xxxx = operating concern.
    Can any one please give the document path how to archive the COPA data.
    Means exactly i want the variant parameters for the 2 new archiving objects.
    Please waiting for your reply...
    Thanks,
    Nagendra

    Hi Chandra sekhar,
    I need to Archive the data in R/3 system & ECC6.0 not in BW system.
    I want the steps how to Archive the 2 objects COPAA_xxxx, COPAB_xxxx in ECC6.0 System.
    Please if have any info please help me...
    Thanks,
    Nagendra

  • COST ELEMENTS IN ACCOUNT BASED COPA

    Hi all,
    1. I understand that all FI/GL accounts correspond to COST   ELEMENTS in COPA.
    2. I also understand that there are NO value fields in an Account Based Profitability Analysis.So there is no VALUE FIELD to KEY FIGURE mapping.
    3. My question is: how do we map each individual GL account into BI?
    4. If we dont map each individual GL account, how do we report these accounts in BI?
    This part of Account based has been very confusing. I have searched numerous posts, but they all have the same answers, none that explains how we handle the numeric fields of account based profitability analysis.
    Cheers
    TJ

    You will have a KF lets say amount
    In account based COPA your Cost and revenue elements will identify what does the value in this KF corresponds to.
    your report will look something like below:
    Ex:
    Cost and Revenue Element #     Amount
    800 - Revenues                     1,000,000
    808 - Sales deductions             100,000
    800 - 808 = Net Revenue            900,000
    893 - Cost of Sales               90,000
    231 - Price Difference              10,000
    Total                               1,000,000
    You may get amount from source system in 2-3 diff currencies like controlling area curr, transaction curr...
    Sometimes range of accounts correspond to a value. Ex: Accounts 800-900 resemble revenue.
    In such a case you may create Text node in hierarchy called revenue and use it in report (if no hierarchy available from the source system) or create selection in the report.,

  • Account based COPA datsource taking long time to extract data

    Hi
    We have created a Account based COPA datasource but it is not extracting data in RSA3 even though the underlying tables have data in it.
    If the COPA datasource is created using fields only from CE4 (segment ) and not CE1 (line items ) table then it extracts data but tat too after very long time.
    If the COPA datasource is created using fields from CE4 (segment ) and  CE1 (line items ) table then it does not extarct any records and RSA3 gives a time out error..
    Also job scheduled from BW side for extracting data goes on for days but does not fetch any data and neither gives any error.
    The COPA tables have huge amount of data and so performance could be a issue. But we have also created the indexes on them. Still it is not helping.
    Please suggest a solution to this...
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    Hi Gaurav
    Check this note 392635 ,,might be usefull
    Regards
    Jagadish
    Symptom
    The process of selecting the data source (line item, totals table or summarization level) by the extractor is unclear.
    More Terms
    Extraction, CO-PA, CE3XXXX, CE1XXXX, CE2XXXX, costing-based, account-based,profitability analysis, reporting, BW reporting, extractor, plug-in, COEP,performance, upload, delta method, full update, CO-PAextractor, read, datasource, summarization level, init, DeltaInit, Delta Init Cause and Prerequisites
    At the time of the data request from BW, the extractor determines the data source that should be read. In this case, the data source to be used depends on the update mode (full initialization of the deltamethod or delta update), and on the definition of the DataSources (line item characteristics (except for REC_WAERS FIELD) or calculated key figures) and the existing summarization levels.
    Solution
    The extractor always tries to select the most favorable source, that is,the one with the lowest dataset. The following restrictions apply:
    o Only the 'Full' update mode from summarization levels is
    supported during extraction from the account-based profitability
    analysis up to and including Release PI2001.1. Therefore, you can
    only everload individual periods for a controlling area. You can
    also use the delta method as of Release PI2001.2. However, the
    delta process is only possible as of Release 4.0. The delta method
    must still be initialized from a summarization level. The following
    delta updates then read line items. In the InfoPackage, you must
    continue to select the controlling area as a mandatory field. You
    then no longer need to make a selection on individual periods.
    However, the period remains a mandatory field for the selection. If
    you do not want this, you can proceed as described in note 546238.
    o To enable reading from a summarization level, all characteristics
    that are to be extracted with the DataSource must also be contained
    in this level (entry * in the KEDV maintenance transaction). In
    addition, the summarization level must have status 'ACTIVE' (this
    also applies to the search function in the maintenance transaction
    for CO-PA data sources, KEB0).
    o For DataSources of the costing-based profitability analysis,
    30.03.2009 Page 2 of 3
    SAP Note 392635 - Information: Sources with BW extraction from the CO-PA
    data can only be read from a summarization level if no other
    characteristics of the line item were selected (the exception here
    is the 'record currency' (REC_WAERS) field, which is always
    selected).
    o An extraction from the object level, that is, from the combination
    of tables CE3XXXX/CE4XXXX ('XXXX' is the name of the result area),
    is only performed for full updates if (as with summarization
    levels) no line item characteristics were selected. During the
    initialization of the delta method this is very difficult to do
    because of the requirements for a consistent dataset (see below).
    o During initialization of the delta method and subsequent delta
    update, the data needs to be read up to a defined time. There are
    two possible sources for the initialization of the delta method:
    - Summarization levels manage the time of the last update/data
    reconstruction. If no line item characteristics were selected
    and if a suitable, active summarization level (see above)
    exists, the DataSource 'inherits' the time information of the
    summarization level. However, time information can only be
    'inherited' for the delta method of the old logic (time stamp
    administration in the profitability analysis). As of PlugIn
    Release PI2004.1 (Release 4.0 and higher), a new logic is
    available for the delta process (generic delta). For
    DataSources with the new logic (converted DataSources or
    DataSources recreated as of Plug-In Release PI2004.1), the line
    items that appear between the time stamp of the summarization
    level and the current time minus the security delta (usually 30
    minutes) are also read after the suitable summarization level
    is read. The current time minus the security delta is set as
    the time stamp.
    - The system reads line items If it cannot read from a
    summarization level. Since data can continue to be updated
    during the extraction, the object level is not a suitable
    source because other updates can be made on profitability
    segments that were already updated. The system would have to
    recalculate these values by reading of line items, which would
    result in a considerable extension of the extraction time.
    In the case of delta updates, the system always reads from line
    items.
    o During extraction from line items, the CE4XXXX object table is read
    as an additional table for the initialization of the delta method
    and full update so that possible realignments can be taken into
    account. In principle, the CE4XXXX object table is not read for
    delta updates. If a realignment is performed in the OLTP, no
    further delta updates are possible as they would make the data
    inconsistent between OLTP and BW. In this case, a new
    initialization of the delta method is required.
    o When the system reads data from the line items, make sure that the
    30.03.2009 Page 3 of 3
    SAP Note 392635 - Information: Sources with BW extraction from the CO-PA
    indexes from note 210219 for both the CE1XXXX (actual data) and
    CE2XXXX (planning data) line item tables have been created.
    Otherwise, you may encounter long-running selections. For
    archiving, appropriate indexes are delivered in the dictionary as
    of Release 4.5. These indexes are delivered with the SAP standard
    system but still have to be created on the database.

  • Reconciliation of  costing based COPA and account based COPA

    hi experts,
                 I want reconciliation statement of A/c based copa and costing based copa through SAP. we have not configured any account based copa reports. now we are manually doing the reconciliation. Please tell me the configuration.
    Thanks & regards
    jay

    HI
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Regards,
    Vijayanand Sankaran

  • COPA Costed and Account based

    Hi Experts,
    I have running In BW, PA Costed based, and now I need activate PA accounted based extractor.
    a) does somebody have any doc or  how-to papers, specific about COPA Accounted?
    b) can will appear any issue or problem  about my current PA costed based loads?
    c) how can I see with pa model (costed or account based)  is running in the R/3 instalation?
    Thank you in adavance!

    Hi,
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Hope this helps
    Regards,
    Aparna

  • Account Based COPA problems

    Hi all,
    I activated the Account Based COPA, but why customer & product (which is the fixed characteristics from SAP) can not be taken during the report execution.
    Everytime I try to see a report with those characteristics it always come back as unassign field.
    Can anyone help me regarding this problems?
    Thanks.
    Lea

    Hi,
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
    You can also use both of these types of CO‑PA simultaneously.
    Hope this helps.
    Rgds
    Manish

  • Customizing Monitor in Profitability Analysis

    Hello SAP-team!
    What functions are provided by the Customizing Monitor in Profitability Analysis?
    ps: thanks to SAP-community!
    Eugene

    Hi,
    Customizing monitor in Profitability analysis as follows..
    General topics:
    35288 Technical Documentation CO-PA
    69384 Account-based Profitability Analysis
    199467 New act assignment table as of Release 4.5
    2. Master data:
    a) Characteristics and value fields:
    13377 Naming conflicts in characteristics and value fields
    21207 Deleting a charctrstc/value field from an op.concern
    40336 Maintaining foreign keys for characteristics
    76493 Changing texts of characteristics or value fields
    b) Characteristics derivation and submission of characteristics values
    32719 Customer hierarchy in CO-PA
    33968 SD/CO-PA: Characteristics from sales document tables
    36557 SD/CO-PA: Transfer partner functions to CO-PA
    62690 Product hierarchy in CO-PA
    93652 Info: Variant configuration in CO-PA
    134889 Info on derv. of char:Why not all flds avail.?
    148609 Char.deriv.:deriv. rule vals miss.aft.upgrade&trnsp.
    172740 Techn.docum.charct. derivtn as of Release 4.0
    c) Valuation
    40408 Valuation for record types 'B' and 'C'
    62536 Valuation using conditions in Profitability Analysis
    67240 Info: Valuation with material cost estimate
    111232 INFO: Valuation for materials valuated separately
    144337 INFO rounding differences: Valuation with costing
    142628 Behaviour of user exit in periodic valuation
    3. Actual data transfer:
    20254 Values from SD are not transferred to CO-PA
    37114 Incorrect setup/reversal of provisions
    33178 +/- sign logic in CO-PA (SD/FI interface)
    52849 Transfer of conditions with +/- signs
    39635 Profitability segment by substitution exits
    64768 FI/CO-PA: Problems with exchange rate differences
    87704 Cost-of-goods-sold Reconciliation: FI to Co-PA
    83702 Acct assignmt logic sales order proc. - REM
    111309 Transfer of quantities into CO-PA
    185826 Enhancement COPA0005
    a) Correction of data inconsistencies
    69370 Clearing data inconsistencies in CO-PA
    70718 Correctn of data inconsistency for order recpt
    140457 Correcting data inconsstncs in incoming orders
    126937 Correction of billing data inconsistency
    93051 Restructure of the segment level from line items
    4. Planning:
    67191 Useful tips on the CO Planning Processor
    72110 KE11: Long runtimes/timeout
    77476 Information: Top-down planning
    124598 CO-PA Planning: FAQs
    5. Information system:
    21773 Performance in reporting (summarization data)
    83204 Usage strategy for summarization levels
    136216 Fast rollup for summ. levels for costing-based CO-PA
    6. Tools:
    134430 Euro conversion and CO-PA
    19015 Termination during external data transfer
    19410 Characteristic validation during external data transfer
    44658 Error with batch input for KE21
    40994 Transport Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) to 3.0
    52636 CO-PA Customizing transport
    128862 Transport Customizing CO-PA in 4.0A/B
    131664 Transport of operating concern structures 4.0
    144015 Client copy and CO-PA/EC-EIS
    65999 Information: Supported ALE scenarios in CO-PA
    94458 CO-PA Realignments: documentation
    113050 Segment table repair after realignments
    127334 Missing archiving of profitability segments
    199959 Change assignmt for operating concern
    67839 Generating parts of an operating concern environment
    69829 Delete operating concern in Release 3.0
    106314 Delete operating concern in Release 3.1
    562043 - Transfer actual costs to Profitability Analysis
    544241 - INFO:Customizing Monitor new fnc 'Report Overview'.
    429517 - INFO: Currency translation Billing document -> CO-PA
    428563 - Material cost estimate valuatn: Translaton for posting date
    400237 - CO-PA INFORMATION: Line item in company code currency
    199959 - Information: change assignmt for operating concern
    199467 - Info: New act assignment table as of Release 4.5
    185826 - Information: Enhancement COPA0005
    172740 - Info.:Techn.docum.charct.derivtn as of Release 4.0
    148609 - Char.deriv.:deriv.rule vals miss.aft.upgrade&trnsp.
    144337 - INFO rounding differences: valuation with costing
    144015 - CC-INFO: client copy and CO-PA/EC-EIS
    142628 - Behaviour of user exit in periodic valuation
    140457 - Info:Correcting data inconsstncs in incoming orders
    136216 - Fast rollup for summ.levels for costing-based CO-PA
    134889 - CO-PA Info on derv.of char:Why not all flds avail.?
    134430 - Information: Euro conversion and CO-PA
    131664 - INFO: Transport of operating concern structures 4.0
    128862 - INFO: Transport Customizing CO-PA in 4.0A/B
    127334 - Missing archiving of profitability segments
    126937 - INFO: Correction of billing data inconsistency
    124598 - Info: CO-PA planning: frequently asked questions
    113050 - Segment table repair after realignments
    111309 - INFO: Transfer of quantities into CO-PA
    111232 - INFO: Valuation for materials valuated separately
    106314 - Delete operating concern in Release 3.1
    94458 - CO-PA Realignments: documentation
    93652 - Info: Variant configuration in CO-PA
    93051 - Restructuring the segment level from line items
    83702 - INFO: Acct assignmt logic sales order proc. - REM
    83204 - Usage strategy for summarization levels
    77476 - Information: top-down planning
    76493 - Changing texts of characteristics or value fields
    75334 - INFO:Downloading CO-PA correctn package fm SAPSERV
    72110 - KE11: Long processing times / timeout
    70718 - INFO:Correctn of data inconsistency for order recpt
    69829 - Delete operating concern in Release 3.0
    69384 - Information: Account-based Profitability Analysis
    69370 - INFO: Clearing data inconsistencies in CO-PA
    67839 - Generating parts of an operating concern environment
    67240 - Info: valuation with material cost estimate
    67191 - Info: Useful tips on the CO Planning Processor
    65999 - Information: Supported ALE scenarios in CO-PA
    64768 - FI/CO-PA: Problems with exchange rate differences
    62690 - Info: product hierarchy in CO-PA
    62536 - Info: Conditions in Profitability Analysis
    52849 - INFO: Transfer of conditions with +/- signs
    52636 - INFO: CO-PA Customizing transport
    44658 - Error with batch input for KE21
    40994 - INFO:Transprt Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) to 3.0
    40408 - Info: Valuation for record types "B" and "C"
    40336 - Info: maintaining foreign keys for characteristics
    39635 - Info: finding the profitability segment using a substitution
    37114 - Incorrect setup/reversal of provisions
    36557 - Info SD/CO-PA:transfer partner functions to CO-PA
    35288 - Profitability Analysis: Technical Documentation
    33968 - SD/CO-PA: Characteristics from sales doc tables
    33178 - INFO: +/- sign logic in CO-PA (SD/FI interface)
    32719 - INFO: Customer hierarchy in CO-PA
    21773 - Performance in Reporting (Summarization data)
    21207 - Deleting a charctrstc/value field from an op.concern
    20254 - INFO: Values from SD not transferred to CO-PA
    19410 - INFO: Char.validity check f.external data transfer
    19015 - Termination during external data transfer
    13377 - INFO: Naming conflicts in charactrst. & value flds.
    Thanks
    Prasada

  • How to Calculate Profitability Analysis ?

    Hi
    kishore
    This is basically a part of Sales and Distribution Module . can u just revert me back with the Answer .
    Regards
    kishore

    Dear kishore
    Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) enables you to evaluate market segments, which can be classified according to products, customers, orders or any combination of these, or strategic business units, such as sales organizations or business areas, with respect to your company's profit or contribution margin.
    The aim of the system is to provide your sales, marketing, product management and corporate planning departments with information to support internal accounting and decision-making.
    Two forms of Profitability Analysis are supported: costing-based and account-based.
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
    Thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • PA - Costing-Based and Account-Based

    Hi All,
    Please tell me what is Costing based PA and Account-based PA.
    Thanks
    Vinu

    Hi,
    Costing-Based Profitability Analysis
    This type of Profitability Analysis is primarily designed to let you analyze profit quickly for the purpose of sales management. Its main features are, firstly, the use of value fields to group cost and revenue elements, and, secondly, automatic calculation of anticipated or accrual data (valuation). The advantage of this method is that data is always up‑to‑date and therefore provides an effective instrument for controlling sales.
    Account-Based Profitability Analysis
    This type of Profitability Analysis enables you to reconcile cost and financial accounting at any time using accounts. In contrast to costing‑based Profitability Analysis, this type uses cost and revenue elements, which gives you a unified structure for all of accounting.
    The system posts all revenues and costs to both Financial Accounting and Profitability Analysis at the same time and using the same valuation method. This means that the cost of sales is posted to Profitability Analysis at the point of goods issue.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • TESTING AB PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS

    Hi all,
    We have configured account based profitability analysis. I was told that there was some data in table COEP available for testing. How do i go about testing this data in BI?
    Could some one give me step by step directions?
    We are working on BI 7.0 thus have DTP and Transformatins.
    Thanks

    refer this doc:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
    you can also use the same solution once live for reconciliation...
    alternatively....
    if there are any account based PA report already developed in source system then use them to tie up records with BW...
    you can carry out data load and check your data load records against those in table (if they are not many)..
    Edited by: sam hennry on Feb 14, 2008 11:33 AM

  • Costing-accounting based COPA then back to costing COPA

    Dear all,
    I would like asking about costing based-accounting based Profitablity Analysis.
    In case, I used and activate both costing based and accounting based profitability analysis. Could i back only use costing based again, even the both copa document already posted?
    I am worried if  system avoid untick the indicator of accounting based and back to active flag=2. It is important i ask in this forum because we only have 1 server for development and sandbox.
    Best regards,
    Dewi

    Hi Dewi
    You will get message (warning):
    Message no. KE107
    Diagnosis
    Operating concern XXXX is set up for both forms of Profitability Analysis (costing-based and account-based).
    You have set an active indicator for only one form. Note that no data will be transferred to the form of Profitability Analysis that you did not activate. If this form is activated at a later point, the data posted up to that point will be missing.
    You can change active flag (customizing request) any time.
    Dejan

  • KEA0 Deactivating Account-based PA

    Hello SAP Guru,
    Currently my COPA has both costing-based and account-based activated.  I would like to deactivate account-based but I am not sure of all the steps involved other than uncheck the box for account-based in the config. Also, we are currently live with COPA, what are some of the things I should watch out for by turning off account-based in the production environment.
    Thank you for your help.
    HT

    Kindly remove the activation in KEKE and save it without assigning the costing based COPA. Then in KEA0, select the operating concern and go to the menupath extras-settings where you will be able to remove the flag on account based COPA. Then you need to save the settings and generate the operating concern. After completing this, you may activate
    the costing based copa in KEKE.
    In the transaction OKKP (in the view activate components/control indicators) you have to change the customizing to Component active for costing based profitability analysis (2)
    The data for the account-based CO-PA is written into the already existing CO-tables: COEP, COEJ, COSP und COSS. So there will be no impact on the tables.
    Reposting existing documents ( like invoices) could be a problem since at the time of posting there was a account based COPA document. So at the time of reversal system will expect the same else will throw error KI144. This error message can be changed into an information or a warning message .Read note 98262 regarding this. This problem could also come for documents 'in process' i.e if sales order and GI has been done  with account based COPA and at the time of billing it is inactive.
    The cost accounting document created with account based CO-PA active is a different one than that with account based turned off. If account based isn't active the posting leaving CO-OM is put to a reconciliation object. If account based is active the same posting will go to a profitability segment for account based CO-PA. This 'trick' made the introduction of account based CO-PA possible without creating extra tables. The reconciliation object is naturally on a higher aggregation
    level, so that the number sum records in CO is smaller than with account based CO-PA active.
    There is a note that describes the differences between the
    costing-based and the account-based Profitability Analysis types. Please review the attached note 69384.
    Nevertheless please test this throughly first in your test-system before going live in production

  • Costing based and account based

    HI All
    Kindly let me know difference between costing based copa and accounting based copa with examples
    Thanks & Regards
    Phaneendra

    Two forms of Profitability Analysis are supported: costing-based and account-based.  
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups
        costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches,
        both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to
        a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in
        accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing
        characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with
        a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
    You can also use both of these types of CO-PA simultaneously.
    (courtesy: help.sap.com)
    It is strongly recommended, however, that you do not activate both types of CO-PA. The
    major reason being is that you will have significant table size impacts. You must be careful
    with account based CO-PA as this creates additional line items in the existing CO tables of
    COEP (actual), COEJ (plan), COSP & COSS (summary records). Hence if you want to do any
    cost center reporting, say, from any of these existing tables you will run the risk that
    performance will be degraded by these additional and unnecessary records. 
    The only advantage of account based over costing based CO-PA is it's ability to
    automatically reconcile back to FI, in much the same manner as you would reconcile
    cost center accounting back to FI. However you don't have the flexibility in account
    based CO-PA to perform valuations using product cost estimates etc. as you do in
    costing based CO-PA. If the reason you were advised to turn on account based CO-PA
    as well as costing based was to facilitate reconciliation, it is suggested that you look
    at alternatives that won't have the same negative impacts that turning on account
    based would have. In addition to the serious table space issues, it is not that easy to
    turn on and off account based at will (especially in production).
    Instead what you should look at doing is creating a series of reports that enable you to
    reconcile costing based CO-PA back to CCA/PCA and FI, if this is required. The complexity
    of the costing based functionality you have used will determine the complexity of the
    reports that will be needed to reconcile back, but it can be done without turning on
    account based CO-PA.

  • Differance between the Cost based costing and Account based costing

    Hi,
    What is the Differance between the Cost Based Costing and Account Based Costing ?

    You can check sap note 69384
    COSTING-BASED PROFITABILITY ACCOUNT-BASED PROFITABILITY
    ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
    OBJECTIVE
    o profitability and sales accounting
    o evaluation of market segments (for example,
    customers, product groups, sales areas) and corporate
    units (for example, division, sales organization) with
    regard to their profit or contribution margins
    o calculation of profits procedures
    - cost-of-sales accounting
    - interim and reconciled sales report
    - periodic and transaction-based allocation
    - Profitability Analysis on the basis of full and
    direct costs
    o posted and costing-based values o account-based values
    o can be reconciled with FI for o always reconciled with
    account groups (revenues, sales FI on account level
    deductions, costs of goods
    Note 69384 - Information: Account-based Profitability Analysis
    manufactured, and so on)
    DATA STRUCTURES
    o definition of operating concerns o definition of operating
    with fixed characteristics and concerns with fixed and useruser-
    defined characteristics defined characteristics
    and value fields
    o cumulative storage by posting o cumulative storage by
    periods and weeks posting periods
    o storage in operating concern o controlling area currency,
    currency (as of Release 4.0 also company code currency
    optional in company code currency and transaction currency
    if req.)
    o user-definable summarization levels
    FUNCTIONS
    o transfer of profit relevant o transfer of profit-relevant
    business transactions from SD, FI activities from SD, FI, CO, MM
    CO, MM (revenues, sales deductions (revenues, sales deductions and
    and costs organized by value fields) costs organized by accounts)
    o Derivation of characteristics from master
    data or using derivation rules
    o Realignments also for data that is already
    posted
    o Valuation
    (Costs of goods manufactured, imputed
    costs and sales deductions)
    o sales and profit planning o profit planning
    - flexible layout - flexible layout
    - periodic distribution - periodic distribution
    - valuation, revaluation - forecast procedure
    - forecast procedure - top-down distribution
    - top-down distribution - simulation
    - simulation
    o profit analysis by means of 'interactive drill-down
    reporting'
    - Report Painter
    - object list/ranking lists, database schema
    - drill-down
    - key figure systems
    - flexible hierarchies
    - navigation between reports
    - exception reporting
    - ABC analyses
    - Exporting (Excel, Winword, Mail)

Maybe you are looking for