ACE IPv6 Support

We've got a CSS11500, and know that we'll eventually have to replace it with something that provides IPV6 support.
Does the ACE for the Cat6500 support IPv6? We've got a 6513 and could add an ACE (and upgrade to IOS and the Sup720s).
If not, does anybody know of a Cisco IPv6 path for content networking.

The word I got from Cisco is that the ACE-20 module will not support IPv6. It will be supported in the follow-on hardware module (ACE-30) in 2H 2011.
We are in the process of pulling out several ACE-20's in favor of a competing vendor as a result of this disappointing news.

Similar Messages

ACE module support for IPv6 ?

what is the latest on IPv6 support for ACE module? I saw something saying 2HCY10, but that's where we are now. Any documentation pointers to current compatability and or roadmap are greatly appreciated.
thanks
Bob O.

As mklemovitch described in the following thread, IPv6 will be
supported on ACE30 module but not in the initial release.
There is no plan for ACE20 module.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3192517#3192517
I'm not sure but maybe around Q3 CY11 or later.
I cannot see the documentation regarding this feature on CCO.
I would suggest to contact your account team for details.
Regards,
Yuji

Is the ACE Module support IPV6?

dear all
is the ACE module support IPV6?
best regards

The ACE does not currently support IPv6 but it is being looked at to be added to the feature set.

IOS XR deny ace not supported in access list

Hi everybody,
We´ve a 10G interface, this is a MPLS trunk between one ASR 9010 and a 7613, and the first thing that we do is through a policy-map TK-MPLS_TG we make a shape of 2G to the interface to the output:
interface TenGigE0/3/0/0
cdp
mtu 1568
service-policy output TK-MPLS_TG
ipv4 address 172.16.19.134 255.255.255.252
mpls
mtu 1568
policy-map TK-MPLS_TG
class class-default
service-policy TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
shape average 2000000000 bps
bandwidth 2000000 kbps
and we´ve the policy TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN as a service-policy inside, this new policy help us to asign bandwidth percent to 5 class-map, wich in turn match with experimental values classified when they got in to the router:
class-map match-any W_RTP
match mpls experimental topmost 5
match dscp ef
end-class-map
class-map match-any W_EMAIL
match mpls experimental topmost 1
match dscp cs1
end-class-map
class-map match-any W_VIDEO
match mpls experimental topmost 4 3
match dscp cs3 cs4
end-class-map
class-map match-any W_DATOS-CR
match mpls experimental topmost 2
match dscp cs2
end-class-map
class-map match-any W_AVAIL
match mpls experimental topmost 0
match dscp default
end-class-map
policy-map TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
class W_RTP
bandwidth percent 5
class W_VIDEO
bandwidth percent 5
class W_DATOS-CR
bandwidth percent 30
class W_EMAIL
bandwidth percent 15
class W_AVAIL
bandwidth percent 2
class class-default
end-policy-map
what we want to do is to assign a especific bandwidth to the proxy to the output using the class W_AVAIL, the proxy is 150.2.1.100. We´ve an additional requirement, wich is not apply this "rate" to some networks we are going to list only 4 in the example, so what we did was a new policy-map with a new class-map and a new ACL :
ipv4 access-list PROXY-GIT-MEX
10 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.15.142.0 0.0.0.255
20 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.15.244.0 0.0.0.255
30 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.18.52.0 0.0.0.127
40 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.16.4.0 0.0.0.255
50 permit tcp host 150.2.1.100 any
60 permit tcp host 10.15.221.100 any
policy-map EDGE-MEX3-PXY
class C_PXY-GIT-MEX3
police rate 300 mbps
class class-default
end-policy-map
class-map match-any C_PXY-GIT-MEX3
match access-group ipv4 PROXY-GIT-MEX
end-class-map
we asign a policy rate of 300 mbps to the class inside the policy EDGE-MEX3-PXY and finally we put this new policy inside the class W_AVAIL of the policy TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
policy-map TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
class W_RTP
bandwidth percent 5
class W_VIDEO
bandwidth percent 5
class W_DATOS-CR
bandwidth percent 30
class W_EMAIL
bandwidth percent 15
class W_AVAIL
service-policy EDGE-MEX3-PXY
class class-default
end-policy-map
and we get this:
Wed Sep 17 18:35:36.537 UTC
% Failed to commit one or more configuration items during a pseudo-atomic operation. All changes made have been reverted. Please issue 'show configuration failed' from this session to view the errors
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:ED_MEX_1(config-pmap-c)#show configuration failed
Wed Sep 17 18:35:49.662 UTC
!! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
!! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
!! errors with each failed configuration command can be
!! found below.
!!% Deny ace not supported in access-list: InPlace Modify Error: Policy TK-MPLS_TG: 'km' detected the 'warning' condition 'Deny ace not supported in access-list'
end
Any kind of help is very appreciated.

That is correct, due to the way the class-matching is implemented in the TCAM, only permit statements in an ACL can be used for QOS class-matching based on ACL.
unfortunately, you'll need to redefine the policy class match in such a way that it takes the permit only.
if you have some traffic that you want to exclude you could do something like this:
access-list PERMIT-ME
1 permit
2 permit
3 permit
access-list DENY-me
!the exclude list
1 permit
2 permit
3 permit
policy-map X
class DENY-ME
<dont do anything> or set something rogue (like qos-group)
class PERMIT-ME
do here what you wanted to do as earlier.
eventhough the permit and deny may be overlapping in terms of match.
only the first class is matched here, DENY-ME.
cheers!
xander

IPv6 support in JDMK 4.2

Hi,
We are working on enhancing our product to support IPv6. Currently we are using JDMK 4.2 with JDK 1.5. Wanted to know if there is any information about JDMK 4.2 support for IPv6?
1) Does it support binding using IPv6 interface
2) Can it accept SNMP request over IPv6 and send traps over IPv6 interface?
Or should we migrate our application to newer version of JDMK?
Regards
-murali

There is IPv6 support in the ASA version 8.2.
We just posted an IPv6 Quick Start guide at https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-15973 and would appreciate feedback on it.
The Public Servers features is a NAT/PAT feature. The good news is that the immense address space of IPv6 eliminates the need for NAT, you can just use use access lists to set up your policy.

IPv6 support in IOS

hi,
we have a Cisco 2851 router and bought the following IOS::
System image file is "flash:c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.124-25d.bin"
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-SPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(25d), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
I thought this version was supposed to have IPv6 support?
TEST(config)#ipv6 unicast-routing
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
TEST(config)#
which IOS should we buy?
regards,
Paal

I think you need the IOS advanced IP Services.
Cheers,
Eehab
- Please rate the asnwers you find useful.

ACE Module support loadbalance rmi, ajp, jms, etc?

Hello,
Do you know if ACE Module support balance the follow protocols:
1. rmis
2. ajp
3. jms
4. IIOP
5. CORBA
6. IIOPS
I know that ACE module support http, https and tcp/udp port.
Best Regards

Hi Alvaro,
There are no specific handlers in ACE for the protocols listed. RMI over IIOP and majority of CORBA implementations are TCP socket based and typically require persistent (Sticky) assignments to real servers if load-balanced, so generic ACE loadbalancing predictors, probes and sticky features should suffice. If you need to do a deeper inspection you can use the Generic Protocol Parsing, and custom Probe (TCL) capabilities to track content of interest. Same applies for JMS and AJP, although there are different transports for these prototocls (i.e. JMS over HTTP) which may change configuration requirements.
In general, since these protocols are used for stateful application integration, long running transactions, messaging, and data access...and they are very sensitive to object namespace/target references you should detail individual use case requirements and applicability of external application delivery controller based load balancing (i.e. using ACE).
Let me know if this helps or if you need more detail. Thanks. -George

Question about Oracle10g Net Services'IPv6 Support

I'm working in a network group which is studying the IPv6.Recently I installed oracle10g in the RedHat Linux-9(kernel-2.4.22,which supported the IPv4/IPv6 dual mode),but I can't configure the oracle10g in IPv6.
I tried every method to find the solution,including read the oracle10g document,use the google,ask the support service,but there was no answer.And I can't login into the metlink to ask question because I didn't have the CSI number.
So who can give me some advice about the configuration.Thank you very muck!

I read the document before it was taken down a couple weeks ago. It said that IPv6 support would be introduced with Oracle11g and not back ported.
Kind regards,
Russ Cannon

What is the maximum number of ARP entries (IPv4) and ND entries (IPv6) supported in our controllers?

Q: What is the maximum number of ARP entries (IPv4) and ND entries (IPv6) supported in Aruba controllers?
A: The maximum number of static ARP entries supported is about 2048 for M3/72xx/70xx platforms.
The maximum number of static ARP entries supported is about 128 for 6xx platforms.
The maximum number of static ND entries supported is about 2048 for M3/72xx/70xx platforms.
The maximum number of static ND entries supported is about 128 for 6xx platforms.

a)It depends upon software level. b) 16,000 per card, With release 9.3:
60K Connections Support on BXM-E—Provides the ability to support a maximum of 60K per card for VSI applications for the BPX 8600, for example, PNNI or MPLS, used on enhanced BXM-E cards.

E4200 IPV6 support (and the removal of it)

Dear Linksys representatives,
Could you please provide some detail on why IPv6 was available in the first builds of the router but then got removed in later firmware versions and the official lecture is that IPv6 is not being supported at all.
I've had a nice little chat with one of your representatives and they could not clarify this at all. Actually, they say no Linksys devices EVER supported IPv6 period, which does not seem to be entirely true. Saw that 1.0.00 (build 13) for the e4200 actaully has IPv6 support in it and the current build has not.
Could you also make a sticky post about IPv6 support on all Linksys devices with wether they will be supporting it in the future or not? Depending on the outcome to this question I'm deciding to return my Linksys device or not, since I actually need to have IPv6 support for development of new soft- and hardware.
Kind regards,
Michel
ps: happy IPv6 day!
http://www.worldipv6day.org/

The E4200v1 and E4200v2 both support IPv6 in the latest firmware. Do you still have a problem? See also: http://home.cisco.com/ipv6 for a list of routers and the test suites that they have past.
All future home routers are expected to have IPv6.

IPv6 support for sx300 series?

Hi all,
I'm wondering if we are going to be seeing some better IPv6 support on these switches? Maybe even some static IPv6 routing?
Thanks.

Apparently it's on the roadmap for 2012, so with a bit of luck we'll see it some time then:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2113913
Oh, whoops, it's already 2013!
Seriously though, an update on where this feature request got to would be appreciated - is there anyone at Cisco who can give us an update?. Perhaps there's a version 8.0 of software for these phones about to be released with new support or something? v7 has been out there a while now.

IPv6 support on ME 3400 Series?

Hello,
I'm looking into deploying a couple ME-3400G-12CS-A metro ethernet switches in our network. All the features listed on data sheet look great, however IPv6 support appears to be missing.
Assuming the ME 3400 series does not support IPv6, will IPv6 support be available in the future through a mean of software upgrade for ME 3400's product roadmap? Or will enablement of IPv6 require complete replacement of ME3400 series products with something else (i.e. for example, Cat3550's hardware TCAM could not support IPv6, thus cat3560 is the right platform to upgrade into for v6 support).
Thanks in advance for any suggestion that you can provide.

ME 3400 does not support IPv6 currently in software. But there is no such limitation in ME 3400 hardware. So you can expect that IPv6 may be supported in near future.

LMS prime 4.2.5 IPV6 support

I'm attempting to configure LMS 4.2.5 to perform IPV6 addressing for polling and device management I need advice on how to proceed as I see very little documentation and I'm not seeing any options in the configuration web GUI

I've not had a chance to exercise the features, but there's a table in Chapter 1 of the LMS 4.2 Admin Guide in the section "IPv6 Support In LMS" that outlines exactly where you can use IPv6 device addresses across the various LMS functions.

IPv6 Support on RV042

Hi,
Any update is planified for add IPv6 support to Cisco Small Business RV042 Router ? My ISP, My modem and server software have IPv6 support but not the RV042

Thanks for participating in the Small Business Support Community. Your feedback is important to us and we do pay attention. IPv6 will be supported on an upcoming RV042 hardware version 3. IPv6 support is not forthcoming for earlier hardware versions.
Please keep the feedback coming. It's how we improve.
Thanks,
Stephanie Reaves
Cisco Small Business Technology Group

2620 IPV6 support

                   Hi Everyone,
On 2620 Router is there any ios version that supports IPV6 ospf under interface config as shown below
(config)#int fastEthernet 1
(config-if)#ipv?
ipv6
1(config-if)#ipv6 ?
IPv6 interface subcommands:
    ospf                OSPF interface commands
    sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-A3JS-M), Version 12.2(26c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2007 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 30-Jul-07 18:03 by ccai
Image text-base: 0x8000808C, data-base: 0x815F24E0
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
R2 uptime is 38 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "flash:c2600-a3js-mz.122-26c.bin"
cisco 2620 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x00) with 61440K/4096K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID JAD0650058C (300495423)
M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
TN3270 Emulation software.
2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
2 Serial network interface(s)
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
Configuration register is 0x2102
Regards
Mahesh

Hi Mahesh,
It appears that you already have IPv6 support (under the interface) with the current version of the IOS. The IOS should be the same for 2620 and 2621 routers.
HTH

ACE IPv6 Support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for