Active low output mode on 660x?

Is it possible to configure the counters on the 6602 to be idle high/ active low?
I currently have an application doing single pulse generation: the output is low when the board is initialized, low after trigger of the counter until the delay count is reached, then high for the duration of the pulse width count. I would to change the program that configures the board (traditional NI-DAQ from a Delphi program) so that some outputs of the board are high after board initialization and are only pulled low during the pulse width count. Possible? Hints on how to do it?
thanks, dean

Hi,
Unfortunately DAQ drivers are not supported under Delphi, it can be used but the only information you can find about using DAQmx or Traditional under Delphi are from customers discussion forums and a couple of National Instruments knowledgebase’s.
Although information is minimal I have some pointers, you are probably in a very advance stage of your project and changing API at this point would be a mistake; but for further implementations there are some knowledge bases on using DAQmx on Delphi. These are the links: How Can I Use the NI-DAQmx ANSI C Function Library with Borland C and Delphi?, Can I Make NI-DAQmx Calls From Borland Delphi? and NI-DAQ and the Delphi Language Interface.
Another point; it seems to me you are trying to implement something like this: Events >> Counter Output Event >> Output Behavior: “Specifies whether the exported Counter Output Event pulses or changes from one state to the other when the counter reaches terminal count. Upon reaching terminal count, the counter can issue a pulse. Use Polarity to select a high or low pulse. For the C reference this is the function needed to change it idle state: “DAQmxSetExportedCtrOutEventPulsePolarity”, it is located in the NI-DAQmx reference help, even though you are not coding in DAQmx it might give you a hint to find the minimum functions needed to accomplish this task.
I hope it helps
Jaime Hoffiz
National Instruments
Product Expert
Digital Multimeters and LCR Meters

Similar Messages

TTL Digital Clock - Wire output feeding 2 active low inputs (LOAD, CLR) only activates one of the inputs when LOW

I'm designing a digital 12 hour clock using TTL. I'm using decade counters to increment the time for the seconds, minutes, and hours. My problem is for the hours:
The hours of a normal clock usually reset when hitting 12 back to 1. The logic for this is easy, since I'm using 2 decade counters for the 10's and 1's of the hour, I NAND whenever the 10's output is 1 and the 1's output is 3. The output of this NAND goes into the active low RESET of the 10's and the active low LOAD of the 1's (because I want to load hour 1, there is no 0 hour). My problem is that only the CLR gets activated during that short LOW pulse, and the 1's stays at the current value of 3.
I've been troubleshooting this for the last hour and I can't figure it out... Any help is greatly appreciated.
PS. My circuit allows for presetting the clock. The switch hotkeys are 'a' and 'space'. To increment the hours when simulating, press 'a' twice, and 'space' twice to increment. Also be aware that the clock LED displays are backwards, so the hours start from the right, 10's of hours, 1's of hours, 10's of minutes, 1's of minutes, etc...
Message Edited by Zmeu on 04-06-2010 11:23 PM
Message Edited by Zmeu on 04-06-2010 11:23 PM
Attachments:
digiclock.ms10 ‏507 KB

Haha, what an adventure eh? In a way, I am sad (and nostalgic) for discrete logic components. But then again, some days, I am not.
Yi
Software Developer
National Instruments - Electronics Workbench Group

ISE Endpoint losing IP after transition to Low-Impact-Mode

I've recently moved an ISE implementation into the low-impact authentication phase, and the client's security cameras are having a rough go of it. In monitor mode, they were able to stay connected as they should but in low-impact mode they are losing their IP addresses as evidenced in the auth session output below:
SWITCH-1#sh auth sess int g4/0/6            Interface: GigabitEthernet4/0/6          MAC Address: 0040.8cc7.4822           IP Address: 10.92.6.3            User-Name: 00-40-8C-C7-48-22               Status: Authz Success               Domain: DATA       Oper host mode: multi-domain     Oper control dir: both        Authorized By: Authentication Server          Vlan Policy: N/A              ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-5165e13c      Session timeout: 3600s (local), Remaining: 338s       Timeout action: Reauthenticate         Idle timeout: N/A    Common Session ID: 0AFF320A000661C965742D42      Acct Session ID: 0x00067E9F               Handle: 0x72000982Runnable methods list:       Method   State       dot1x    Failed over       mab      Authc SuccessSWITCH-1#sh auth sess int g4/0/6            Interface: GigabitEthernet4/0/6          MAC Address: 0040.8cc7.4822           IP Address: 169.254.45.196            User-Name: 00-40-8C-C7-48-22               Status: Authz Success               Domain: DATA       Oper host mode: multi-domain     Oper control dir: both        Authorized By: Authentication Server          Vlan Policy: N/A              ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-5165e13c      Session timeout: 3600s (local), Remaining: 338s       Timeout action: Reauthenticate         Idle timeout: N/A    Common Session ID: 0AFF320A000661C965742D42      Acct Session ID: 0x00067E9F               Handle: 0x72000982Runnable methods list:       Method   State       dot1x    Failed over       mab      Authc Success
This is happening approx. every 10 seconds which curiously is the timer value of my dot1x tx-period. As well, the host never has its reauthentication timer restarted but I can see the following in ISE approx. every 10-15 seconds:
Why is it going through Dynamic Authorization? Why am I losing my legitimate IP address every 10 seconds and getting an APIPA address in its place? The port configuration is as follows:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/6 description Security switchport access vlan 292 switchport mode access ip access-group ACL-DEFAULT in power inline auto max 15400 authentication event fail action next-method authentication host-mode multi-domain authentication open authentication order dot1x mab authentication priority dot1x mab authentication port-control auto authentication periodic authentication violation restrict mab dot1x pae authenticator dot1x timeout tx-period 10 storm-control broadcast level 2.00 storm-control action shutdown spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree bpduguard enableend
And my ACL-DEFAULT is...
Extended IP access list ACL-DEFAULT    10 permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps    20 permit udp any any eq domain    30 permit icmp any any    40 permit udp any any eq tftp    50 deny ip any any log
Upon switch log review, I'd noticed that the ACL-DEFAULT is blocking the cameras from certain igmp and tcp/554 (RTSP) communications. To see if it would help, even though I shouldn't have to, I placed ACE's into my ACL-DEFAULT to permit this traffic and would still drop my IP address every 10 seconds. I shouldn't have to do this because the "xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-5165e13c" is a simple "permit ip any any" ACL which should allow all of the traffic to flow.
Ideas?
Kind Regards,
Kevin

As well, the dACL is properly replacing the first "any" with the endpoint's IP:
SWITCH-1#show ip access-lists interface g4/0/6
     permit ip host 169.254.45.196 any
SWITCH-1#show ip access-lists interface g4/0/6
     permit ip host 10.92.6.3 any
Kind Regards,
Kevin

Smartphones - Low Battery Mode?

Just woken up this morning, and my battery's only on 2 bars... which isn't a problem in itself, but it made me think of an idea lol
Wouldn't it be good if the phone could have an option to automatically switch to a 'Low Battery Mode' which would shut down all the fancy, battery intensive settings - bluetooth, fancy wallpapers & screensavers, active desktop, camera (or the camera switching on if the slide opens - the user must go to camera in the menu to activate
I'm sure there's a lot more that could be done with that, but I thought I'd throw it open for discussion here and see what people think... I'm sure it would be a valuable tool for people that just want their phone to last longer until they can get home to charge it.
Obviously if Nokia decide to use my idea after seeing this post, I'd love to take the credit for it :-p
Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

Thanks richcowell, that sounds like a good idea.
You'll certainly get credit here on the boards for posting the idea - however, here is an excerpt from the Membership terms:
License to Nokia for Any Submitted Content
By submitting, and upon such submission of, any information or materials such as feedback, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, answers, questions, comments, suggestions, scores, hints, strategies, concepts, designs, ideas, plans, orders, requests or the like, or any other material ("Content") to Nokia or through the Site(s) and Services, for example, by e-mail, SMS, and/or MMS, you license and grant Nokia and its affiliates and sub- licensees a non-exclusive, royalty-free and free of charge, perpetual, worldwide, irrevocable, and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, communicate to the public, make available, publish, translate, copy, modify, adapt, create derivative works of, distribute, and display such Content or any concept described in it throughout the world in any media, product and/service, including, without limitation wireless devices, mobile phones and any related products, services and accessories, advertising, marketing and promotional materials, and digital reproductions, without compensation, restrictions on use, acknowledgement of source, accountability or liability, and with waiver of all moral rights and rights of attribution, integrity and identity.
I wrote all my posts from 2005-2011 as an "Admin" for this community. I still work for Nokia as an external consultant, so my rank in all posts is now "Employee".

Win10 defeating my system's low power modes

Both of these devices ran properly in their low-power modes under 8.1x64:
1) Radeon HD 7850 2GB--For some reason after a boot up, 10-20 minutes later, my GPU jumps from its low-power clocks of 300Mhz/150MHz (core/ram) to full power, and shows 92% GPU activity and appears "stuck" there. Removing all of the Win10
updates did not alleviate the problem as I was hoping for. This is the case regardless of AMD gpu driver used. But it gets better...
2) Not only is my GPU stuck on full throttle mode (even when doing nothing or else simply browsing), but my *CPU,* which under 8.1x64 ran fine with AMD's Cool'nQuiet power reduction modes (like Intel's Speed Step), *also* (at the same time) kicks up to *full
power* although set in Windows to fluctuate between 10% and 100% on a demand basis.
The only cure that works is to log off and then back on...which corrects the problem for about another 20-30 minutes before both devices go to full power again. Definitely something is strange in the Win10 Preview (which I upgraded from an 8.1 installation
with none of these problems.)
Now this may or may not be tied to the problem, but for some really oddball reason Windows10TP will not let me install two innocuous utilities I've used for years: CPU-Z & HWmonitor. Win10 claims these application are incompatible with it--yet,
these are only simple hardware identifying programs--and both ran without difficulty under 8.1x64.
Suggestions appreciated...!

Mike...Thanks for the reply! This is a real head-scratcher...;) I've used the last three drivers from AMD for the gpu--same result every time. All clocks in the system bios (UEFI) are set to default, and my Win10 install is UEFI (not legacy)
and the Secure Boot State is ON. All clocks are running at defaults. I also reinstalled the Win10TP updates as I determined they weren't the problem as it continued after I uninstalled them.
Yes, C'nQ it is enabled in the bios (as I mentioned, all of this stuff worked like a clock under 8.1x64)...and that's the weird thing...Win10TP...operates exactly like it should in relation to the low power modes for around 20-30 minutes--exactly like it
did in 8.1 all the time--and then for some inexplicable reason both devices jump to full power/full speed--as if something is running that demands the power/speed--but it isn't!
I've run differing browsers with hardware acceleration turned off; I've run nothing at all apart from normal boot-up running programs, and it makes no difference. Something is throwing these devices into max-power mode after 20-30 minutes from a boot/log-off/on
having occurred.
Motherboard is MSI G46-970a, UEFI version 2.6 (latest)
CPU is AMD FX-6300 @ stock speeds & voltages
8GBs DDR 3 running with stock timings and settings (2x4GB)
HIS HD 7850 2GB running @ stock speeds/voltages
I've all through the power savings options I'm using and can't find anything that might explain this--I keep going back to the fact that this never happened even once under 8.1, and I started with 8.0 in Jan '13 and have upgraded from there--never happened
with Win7x64, either (same hardware, same settings.)
I'm wondering if maybe I ought to be running the Enterprise version of Win10TP, but I can't really think of *why* that would make a difference with these symptoms...
If you think of anything else, I'm all ears...;)
Edit: BTW, I am Migration User 1...;) I hadn't signed in when I posted the original question--I suppose--although I didn't think I could post without being signed in...

Can't send to bus when in low latency mode?

My colleague and I have almost the same setup, except he is running OS X 10.8.5, and I'm running OS X 10.9.4, Both are running Logic X 10.0.7. He has Apogee hardware (Symphony 64 card to DA16X/AD16X), and I have a UA Apollo.
For some reason, this works on my setup, but not on his:
Set up a bus send on any audio or VI channel, and assign the output of that channel to outputs 3-4 (outputs 1-2 are both of our main outs). The purpose of this is to send to a cue/headphone box.
Set latency compensation to Instruments and Tracks (not ALL, setting it to ALL defeats this)
Turn on low-latency mode.
Turn on Software Monitoring (buffer is set to 64)
Record enable that track.
On my setup, I get signal on channels 3-4, on his, no signal as soon as record is enabled
Auto-input monitoring is off in both cases.
On my setup, the bus popup turns orange, but I still hear the signal, on his, it turns orange, but no signal.
All plugins removed on the track and the bus.
Weird.

Bus Send is set the same on both systems, Post Pan, Post Fader, Pre Fader ?
Good point, I'll check that
Bus is set to output on 3-4 ?
Yes, on both systems
Bus level is the same ?
Yes, similar anyway
Sure you friend doesn't have any plugins on the master output bus ?
I didn't consider that - somehow didn't think that plugins on the master bus (which is outputting on 1-2) could effect a different bus. Will check that tomorrow.
Do you by any chance have direct monitoring enabled on the Apollo, any input signal will be heard.
I do use direct monitoring on the Apollo, but that is not a factor - it's prerecorded material we are trying to monitor, not input signal.
Curious as to why are you running in Low Latency mode, it is for a specific purpose not something to be used in general recording/work.
He is running on an older Mac tower and uses a lot of plugins and prefers software monitoring, and finds that he has problems unless he enables low latency mode. I usually leave it off, I just wanted to see if the issue was present on my system as well, and it's not.
Thanks, will report back.

Xperia Z3 always awake sometimes, even with Stamina, Ultra Stamina, Low Battery modes

Hi to all,
Has anyone every noticed his/her Z3 always awake (and thus bad battery life), even from within Ultra Stamina mode with no running apps?
This happened to me twice now with just over two weeks of using this phone. I haven't been able to take specific steps to replicate this yet, but 2 days in about 16 days means so far over 12% of the days.
Usually, the phone lasts over 24 hours with moderate use. I normally have stamina mode "on", and set to activate at 50% battery level, and then Low Battery mode to activate at 20%. Note also that all the apps I am using have been installed from the first day I've been using the phone. That is, I have not installed any new apps before I noticed this happening, and when I have "normal" battery life it is using the same set of apps.
Here is an outline of what happens:
I notice a much faster than usual power drain, despite being a typical day of usage (i.e. nothing out of the ordinary).
I go to battery usage, and see the history details, and see that "Awake" has been on constantly, including during long screen off times, and all the while with Stamina mode enabled and active.
I then restart the phone. Problem still there, still constantly awake despite screen off and stamina.
Battery dips below 20% and Low Battery mode activates.
Phone keeps on being constantly "awake", despite no usage and now both low battery AND stamina modes on.
Restart the phone. Same problem.
I turn on Ultra Stamina mode. (I did this last time at 17%)
Phone continues to be always awake. Battery quickly drains down to 5% within less than an hour and almost no use, even though Ultra Stamina is supposed to stretch the life for an order of magnitude longer than that.
I shut off the phone to avoid complete discharge. When I return home, I plug it in and wait for a decent charge before turning the phone back on.
After full charge, I take the phone off the charger.
Phone now works normally again, without always being "awake".
I can't figure out what causes this sequence of events to kick off in the first place. I'm trying to play around with things to get it to start doing this, but so far I haven't been successful in deliberately replicating the problem.
Anyone else experience anything like this before?
My android version is 5.0.2, v. 23.1.A.0.726.

Perforn a clean update and report back in 3-5 days
PC Companion (PCC)
http://support.sonymobile.com/us/tools/pc-companion/
Bridge (for Mac)
http://support.sonymobile.com/global-en/tools/bridge-for-mac/
Alternatives on How to backup Xperias
http://talk.sonymobile.com/thread/36355
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." Kurt Cobain (1967-1994)

Low latency mode didn't bypass latent plugins, or turn them orange

in our case it was waves' bass rider plugin. we had low latency mode enabled, the plugin was bypassed even, and still it caused the entire output to be latent.
i was under the impression that low latency mode was supposed to bypass these things and turn them orange right?
our latency limit was set to zero as well.
ideas?

There are so many factors that affect latencey and if you're making your living or it''s really important, I'd roll up my sleeves and tackle this puppy head on. Do you have a really high track count? Are you running a lot of plug ins? What is the disk buffer size set to? What do you have the processing threads set to? How much RAM do you have? Are you using an external drive that's fighting to keep up? What sample rate are you running at........
I think you see where I'm going with this! It's a slippery slope my friend but nothing you can't figure out. It really all depends on understanding what you have and how best to optimize it for what you want to do. That's why a lot of the help forums can be so confusing because there isn't a simple answer that works for everyone.
In the meantime, if you really wanna just get to the business of making music try monitoring through your desk when you're tracking and only use the plugins for playback (disable software monitoring, but only if you have the hardware that will enable you to do so).
Good luck!

Low latency mode

Hi,
I'm doing vocal recording now,facing latency problem.Finally i'm trying to apply the LOW LATENCY MODE ,it really solve the latency when press the Rec Enable button...but howevery i try to route with Aux or Bus(Vocalist required some reverbs while singing)...it doesn't work..and level meter didn't show any input signal on the Aux or Bus!!!
and when i apply the Low Latency from the Vocal track Send button...level meter become active on Aux or Bus but the LATENCY appear again even the Low Latency Mode i still ON it.
What's my problem here...
Urgent!!!!Thanks for helps...

the better setting in recording (with Motu device) is:
Don't use "low latency mode" (it is a logic 8 feuatures but it is not so useful)
Sample buffer set to 256k
PDC set to Software and Instruments (avoid to use Aux or Multi instruments mode)
Reverbs and delay can be used on the Buss because latency on reverbs gives you a good predelay effect... (when PDC is set to All, usually, I use sample delay in reverber Buss in order to be able to have the same great reverbs sonds )
... PDC set to ALL gives you a lot of latency...
if you use Multi Instruments.. the better way is: (I never use Multi out instrument... i prefer to export as audio the parts!
Bounce the instrumental parts...
open a new project, import the instrumental parts... set PCD to "Track and Instrument)
When Mixing .. mastering PDC must be set to ALL...
in every other situation (expecially in recording phase) "track and instruments" PDC setting is the better choice!
G

How to create a calendar activity in accessibility mode ?

I didn't find any way to create a calendar activity in accessibility mode. Since it shows blank list of days in calendar component for a month.
It seems to be a bug in ADF calendar component. Please suggest if there is any alternate way to support this.
Thank you so much.

Timo,
From a reference doc of previous version of jdev/adf, it said :
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/cn/java/calendar-091799.html
Expand the Data Controls accordion and drag the collection that represents the view object for the activity created above (FodCalEventVO) and drop it as a Calendar.
But in Jdev 12c.--cannot find the Create Calendar choice.
In jdev 12c can drag and drop a calendar component from the component palette, but do not now how to bind it to view objects.
Thanks.
BAO

I-trigue 3400 soundwoofer not working / right speaker low output compare with left speaker

Hi, basically i have 3 sets of creative i-trigue 3400 purchase as second hand. All these 3 sets have some minor problem. I trust my ability i able to repair it as iam a professional electronic engineer. Just need some advance information or guidance from creative big brother and sister.
i do check with the controller everything, because i have 3 sets so i able to verified the problem.
1)subwoofer not output----Is it problem with amplifier or any transistor damage? How do i start checking and verified it?
2)right speaker low output compare with left speaker----I already analysis it and would like to know is it the transistor prolem? Please let me know so i can start with my repairing.
From what i know, this model seem like going to discord soon, so is it possible send me a partial schematic on the 3400 so i can repair. Please let me know and reply me, i am waiting your answer. Thank you

seem like nobody reply my email, can creative technical provide some guide. I already mention i will repair myself.:angry:

LaserJet MFP M175nw-- low energy mode or shut down?

I recently upgraded to an HP MFP175 nw. I use this printer in a home environment on a stand alone laptop. I don't need to print documents on a daily basis, which raises my question: Is there an advantage in leaving the printer on in it's sleep/low energy mode for hours or even days at a time when not in use or should it be completely powered down? I'm not concerned with the power draw in leaving it on and in doing so it avoids the re-initializing process that the printers has to go through each time it is powered on. Which is better or does it not really matter? thanks in advance.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Personally I leave my CP1525 on all the time and let the automatic power management take care of things. I think there is less stress on the unit this way and probably better toner life due to less initialization routines.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

Using email output mode with af:table

Hi everyone,
I am currently experiencing an issue with the email output mode. We have a page with an af:table that allows email output mode. When in thise mode, the table only shows 1-15 results.
How can we allow the table to show all it's content?
Thank you.

The number of table rows displayed in "email" mode is determined by the af:table's "rows" attribute. By default this attribute is bound to the data iterator's range size. You can modify the "rows" attribute in order to return an arbitrary large number when the page is displayed in "email" mode, thus instructing the table to render all the rows, for example:
<af:table value="#{bindings.DepartmentsView1.collectionModel}"
rows="#{adfFacesContext.outputMode=='email' ? 1000000 : bindings.DepartmentsView1.rangeSize}"
...Dimitar

Low latency mode doesn t work?

If I enable "Low latency Mode" nothing happens, Ioaded tons of Plugins and set the limit to 1 ms....Shouldnt it bypass some plugins? Someone who knows the problem

does it work for you?

ISE low impact mode/Closed/Monitor

Can we put the the profiles one by one into closed mode in ISE
for example:
You have three rules
Group A---Switch A---DOT1X-- Low impact mode
Group B--Swicth A--DOT1X---Closed Mode
Group c-- Switch A-- DOT1X-- Monitor Mode.
- Now, after testing Low-impact mode and Monitor mode, one by one can we put them in closed mode?
Can we accomplish this, Rule by rule?
Minakshi

Deploying Monitor Mode first allows to step through all the issues, gaining visibility into successful and failed authentications, with minimal impact to the users and endpoints. Once issues have been addressed through Monitor Mode you can provide secured network access Closed Mode.
note :Closed Mode is recommended only for IT environments that are experienced with 802.1X deployments and have considered all the nuances that go along with it.In closed mode any traffic prior to authentication will be dropped, including DHCP, DNS, and Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) traffic.Make sure evry thing is sorted out

Active low output mode on 660x?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for