Actual cost by task by means of evaluations

Hi experts,
We are working on cprojects 4.5. We have cprojects with phases and tasks tranferred to PS ( one wbs for each object). Costs are charged in WBS linked to tasks. Is it possible see in cproject actual cost at task level? We thought by means of evaluations are possible but only appears at project level.
Any idea is welcome!
Regards,
Sara

Hi Sara,
Not in standard.
But it can be realized via Badi in cProject side and a customer function modul in ERP system.
Logic briefly:
1. Creation a customer own function modul in ERP system, it should be remote-enabled and should deliver the costs of specifed object.
2. Implement the Badi of cProject evaluation, within the impementation call the customer function modul and fill the value of actual costs.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Similar Messages

Actual cost in the workplan task screen (hierarchy) not show value.

Hi all,
Could you advice me about actual cost if I want to show in the workplan task screen (hierarchy).
Thank you.

Well, then just check the master data setting in Query designer--> choose 0Costcenter and check the properties > choose advanced tab> under filter value Selection during Query Execution . check for these options
1.Only Posted Values for Navigation
2.Only values in Infoprovider
3.Values in Master data table
4.Characterstic Relationship.
You need to choose the 3rd opitions as you need to read the master tables for 0costcenter.
Hope it helps,
Cheers,
Balaji

ACTUAL COSTS:REPORT WITH STATISTICAL WBS AND ASSETS ASSIGNED TO THEM

Hi all,
I would like to run a report that gave me this info:
WBS Element (all statistical)
Assets assigned to each WBS
Actual costs
It would be perfect CJI3 but it doesn't show assets. In AM I haven't see either any report that shows WBS elements...
any ideas???

An statistical WBS element is an SAP object . Statistical means that you need another object to post the cost or income, let's say,an asset.
Actual costs are the real postings you have in an object, coming from MM, SD, GL ... (just the contrary as budget or planned values).

How to analyse actual cost for each operation in Process/Production Order?

Hi all,
IN SAP, I know that we can analyze plan cost for Operation in Process Order/ Production Order.
However, I can not analyze Actual cost for Operation .
I know the object when I good issue material is ORDER, not OPERATION.
But, as requirement of users, they want to analyze actual cost for each Operation.
CAn SAP do this analyze?
If Yes, What should I do in SAP to have this reports?
THanks in advance,
Emily Nguyen

Hi Emily,
as I see from one other message that you're using material ledger. Then your expectation is apparently to also see the actual costs of materials in your production order by operation.
This is not supported. Actual material costs are handed up in material ledger multi-level settlement from one material to the next, bypassing the production orders.
That means the production order will always contain the material costs valuated at plan price, not at actual price.
For activity prices that might be better, when you revalue the orders at actual activity prices with CON2. But even there I am not sure that it will always be assigned correctly to the operations.
There is currently an enhancement in development, the operation level costing. But that will affect more the planned cost side not the actuals. Might be interesting to learn more about your requirements and the use case behind.
best regards,
Udo

Std Costing and Actual costing at process Order

Hello Friends,
Followings are the client requirements, Please give me your ideas :-
1 . Costing variant is same for all three - costing run, process order (plan and actual), means there is no prices variance on process order level. ( material at std price, Activity plan price, overhead fix%)
2. Alongwith this above client also need to capture actual result (material at MAP, activity at monthly actual price, overhead fix %)
In this case there is price and usage variance can see.
Now as I think that both scenarios are not possible on process order level. According to me we can do by a customize actual costing cockpit.
Need your openion that do we have any option thru standard funcations of sap to get this requirement. If you need any other explanation , please do let me know.
Thanks
Ravi

Thanks friends. I have done.

Activity type - actual cost automatic updation

Hello Gurus
I have done KL01 KP06 and KP26 transactions. That is I ahve defined the activity and assignes a cost conter to it.
i need some report , when i will check the tcode S_ALR_87013611 - Cost Centers: Actual/Plan/Variance
Here my actaul cost want to update actumatically , is it possiable
can Anybody give me the solution
Regards
Sri

Hi,
What do you mean by 'automatic' update of actual costs? Whenever you will post a transaction on the activity type you have defined, you will create actual costs based on the tariffs you have provided.
Regards,
Eli

Standard and actual costing run

I am doing actual coting run ckmlcp every month end on last of the month. stadard costing run I am doing on start of the month on 1st day of the month before actual transactions taking place.
Here the problem is I already did the stadard costing and actual costing runfor april, now i want to do stadard costing today midnight 1AM for june and I want to do actual costing tomarrow evening 6PM for may.
April stadard price is Rs150 and current stadard price is Rs 160 beacause of 1st june costing run. If I will do the costing for May month now means (1st)tomarrow evening which stadard price it will pick in ckmlcp and varience calculated.

as cost estimate is run for the material in plant u can not get cogs at depot level.
Edited by: kumaraguru v on Jan 17, 2008 12:24 PM
Edited by: kumaraguru v on Jan 17, 2008 12:25 PM

Planned Cost is taken from Actual Cost even through there is Baseline Cost

Hi All,
Responsibility: Project Super User
Create Project with fully shared structure
Enter planned cost for 25000 against Task (Define Project scope in detail) with Financial Element as Resource and baseline the work plan.
Now enter the actual cost for 15000 against Task (Define Project scope in detail) and system is computing 15000 in Actual Column along with planned cost as 15000 in planned cost column instead of showing 25000 in planned cost column.
Why system is showing planned cost as 15,000 in planned cost column instead of 25000?
Please help.

Hi
I'm not sure I understand the steps you were taking.
Actual costs should be summary of expenditure items. Those could be labor hours entered on time cards, supplier invoices etc. Those are entered on Project Costing, Distribute and summarize there
I couldn't understand your statement about entering 15000 actual cost on the same page as entering the planned cost for the workplan.
Dina

GI Actual Cost-Material Component

Hello Experts,
I have maintained movement type 101 for GR, 281 for GI for valuated project stock and Item Category L for creating material component. Actually, my report reflects the planned figures on WBS, then breaks on activity then reflects further breakdown at the material breakdown level under the activity.
When comes to actual cost i.e. first GR the value goes on WBS, which is correct. However, when I do GI it goes on the activity and my material actual cost breakdown figures don’t appear, neither does the commitment column. They remain zero instead and the Actuals GI figure reflects on activity.
Can you please tell me where am i doing anything wrong.?
Thanks,
Kumar Srinivasan

Hi,
Just check your procurement parameters.
If the parameters are set to reserve/ purchase the material for a network and not WBS then it will always look for the network number as the controlling object. From there only you handle your stock, Good Receipts, Good Issues and its valuation means how it is valuated.
Eg:-
If you have set up your project by contradicting that the project definition has group requirements for a project and then you don’t have Q on your special stock indicator on the procurement page, then you will have your costs going in different directions.
I hope this will clear your doubts.
Regards,
Amit Rajoria

PLM table for Internal Order budget, Actual Cost and Actual Hrs

Dear all
In cProjects version 4.0, we have integration with existing ECC 6.0. We create Internal Order manually and assign it to cProjects.
One cProject having one Internal Order.
Resource Planning part is managed in cProjects while Actual Time keeping(CATS with reference to Internal Order), budgeting of Internal Order, Material and Service Procurement which is done against Internal Order is managed in ECC. ECC and PLM are separate systems.
We have RFCs established to transfer actual hrs, budget and actual cost data from ECC to PLM.
Which is the ABAP table in PLM where we get linking of cProject with Internal Order and also actual hrs, budget and actual cost data in PLM system?
Thanks & Regards
Ashish

actual hrs, budget and actual cost data in PLM system?
Its not there, actual hours can be found in DPR_Task but it needs to be transferred by running a report.
The planned cost etc is also calculated at runtime and passed on to Costing object in ECC (Int order/PS)
Actual hours will be in CATSDB in ECC
needless to say actual cost will also be there in ECC and not in PLM, PLM only displays at runtime based on RFC.
If you want to try, Break the RFC and try to check the Evaluation..
Niranjan

Table where i see actual cost line item for order (KRMI)

Dear.
I need to know the table of every single document number of a cost element that I see in the actual cost line item for orders using transaction KRMI.
Thanks
Moderator: Please, search SDN

Hi
Refer the field Object No (OBJNR) in COEP.. In your case, the OBJNR would be ORXXXXYYYYYYYYYYY, where OR means Order, XXXX = Contr Area and YYYYYYYY = Int Order No with preceeding zeroes
Qty is also recorded in COEP
BR,Ajay M

Actual costs for laboratory exams / Material Ledger

Hi Experts
I have a doubt for actual cost scenario for laboratory industry.
My background is for product cost for consumer goods, specially food companies, so this is a new segment for me.
This laboratory has baseline version, no service/production order, it means all material consumption goes to cost center and they use activities to send costs from cost center to cost center.
They have BOM for all exams (finished product). They only run CK40N for standard costs but they don't have actual cost (material ledger - CKMLCP) implemented.
This is the issue: they want actual cost for every exam in the way we have for consumer goods industry.
So they can analyse profitability for product (exam) x customers.
I wounder if the same industry actual cost scenario can be applied to this business segment or if there is a special SAP solution for this segment.
The main issue is the stock, there is no stock, it´s service. I believe we could change the account in BSX key (OBYC) for some P&L accounts but I´d like your opinion/experience.
I hope you help me to clarify these doubts
Thanks in advance.

Dear Rupesh,
I don't think so there will be any std.report in PS module to show plan vs actual cost of material component.
For looking plan vs actual cost in PS having many std reports but they don't show for material component.
I think for this you need to develop a Z report which will show Plan vs Actual cost of material component.
In CN52N report (Component overview report) you can add two fields one is for plan cost & other for actual cost.This can be one of possibilty you can try.Otherwise develop a new Z report for the same.
For this you need to take yr abaper's help.
Regard's
Sandeep

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

OPM Actual Cost Process not selecting all Inventory Movements

We have completed 27 Move Immediate transactions (TRNI) but only 2 of the transactions appear in the Actual Cost Transactions View so our PMAC cost is not as expected. Those 2 transactions were in Sept '09. All other transactions happened in Apr, May, Jun of 2009. On July 7 the profile option "GMF: Include Inventory Movements in Actual Cost" was changed to YES. Does this mean that the Actual Cost Process will not pick up those move immediate transactions that occured before July 2009?
Robert Lovell

Hi Robert
Yes...exactly, since you have closed all the said periods before u run your Actual cost process, and later you changed your profile option.
If you want, that all the transactions (TRNI) to be in Actual process as View, Functionally (I mean from front end) it is not possible now, but u can make use of PL/SQL Language by means of technical help then you can open those periods from back end and then do the set up from front end, and then you may able to view those transactions.
It is purely technical help and require some gud stuff to do this.
Regards
Raj

Actual Cost? Actual Work? Scheduled Downtime EndDate?

I am using SCSM 2012 and I have lot of Incidents. When I run this query:
SELECT * FROM IncidentDimvw
I receive a list of all my Incidents and his properties, but I have a lot of columns BLANK like: Actual Cost, Actual Work, Scheduled Downtime EndDate, etc.
What is in Incidents view? I it means? I can see any field on Incident form for this properties.
Thank you.

So i might be helpful to look at the class definition for Work Item. Work item is the base class (mostly, it also inherits from Entity, but so does EVERYTHING else) for all of the "work" in service manager (i.e. Incident, Service Request, Activities, Changes,
etc). Work item defines the following properties:
Id
Title
Description
ContactMethod
CreatedDate
ScheduledStartDate
ScheduledEndDate
ActualStartDate
ActualEndDate
IsDowntime
IsParent
ScheduledDowntimeStartDate
ScheduledDowntimeEndDate
ActualDowntimeStartDate
ActualDowntimeEndDate
RequiredBy
PlannedCost
ActualCost
PlannedWork
ActualWork
UserInput
FirstAssignedDate
FirstResponseDate
now Incident inherits from Work Item, so it has all of the properties general to all work items, as well as all of the items specific to incidents. here is the list of incident specific properties:
TargetResolutionTime
Escalated
Source
Status
ResolutionDescription
NeedsKnowledgeArticle
TierQueue
HasCreatedKnowledgeArticle
LastModifiedSource
Classification
ResolutionCategory
Some of the properties that are general to all work items are not used, by default. For instance, PlannedCost and ActualCost are not exposed on the incident form, or populated by the default workflows.
(DisplayName is defined on System.Entity, fyi)
Hopefully this helps you understand why there are a bunch of properties on the incident table, and why some of them are blank. They are defined on the abstract base class, probably with the intention that future processes or work will use them.

Actual cost by task by means of evaluations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for