Actual cost of FG batch

Hi all GURU's,
I had posted this thread earlier also but i had not got any reply on this. Hence I had closed that thread & now posting my query with this thread.
Please if anybody can throw some light on this..........
My BOM structure is as follows. The BOM is the multilevel BOM as shown below.
FG-----SFG 1 + RM 1 + RM 2
SFG 1----SFG 2 + RM 3 + RM 4
SFG 2-----SFG 3 + RM 5 + RM 6
SFG 3-----RM 7 + RM 8
All the FG, SFG & RM'S are the batch managed. All the fg & sfg's are maintained at the standard price in the material master.
Now assume that SFG1, SFG2, SFG3, batches are manufactured at the cost which deviate too far form the material master. This may be because excess/lower raw material cosumption & wide variation in the actual activity.
Now I want to know the cost of FG based on the actual costs of SFG & RM"S batches used. How can I do this in SAP.
Reagards,
MHP

Hi Rajesh,
I have tested what you had suggested in this thread,
Following are the findings
1) All the batches of the SFG & FG are valuated at mvg. avg. price. mentioned in the material master even if i am issuing double than planned material as well as double the actvity.
2) Since the batch of SFG is not valuated at the actual cost, the actual cost is not passed to the higher level.
One thing I can share with you is the warning messge which i am getting while making GR for the order by mb 31 which is as follows---
Material COLL FG plant XYZ1 valuated with valuation type  instead of TEST2000
Message no. CK840
Diagnosis
Material COLL FG in plant PT01 cannot be valuated with valuation type TEST2000 because no split valuation is ever possible for that material in this plant.
System Response
The material is valuated with valuation type .
But in OMWC setting, Valuation Cat.-X  Automat.(Batch) is active for the plant & material is assigned to the same Valuation Cat.-X in the material master. Since val cat is X there is no question of valuation type. As well as in OMWO split mtl val is active.
PLease suggest what can be wrong ???
Regards,
MHP

Similar Messages

  • Actual cost process

    Hello to all! I wanted to know if somebody can help me with costs of OPM. I am working in a test instance and I will make inventory transactions: Purchase receptions, Transfer among werehauses, inventory adjustments. As well as, to report in WIP of production batches. I have ready standard cost of each item and I want to know if it is enough to copy it at the current cost before beginning to make the transactions and calculate actual costs or I have to make some other process.
    rgvel@

    Hi
    I am not sure what the purpose or itention is and hence the question becomes a bit unclear. Could you please elaborate on what is it that you want to achieve. You mention about actual cost and then you say you have standard cost available
    REgards
    Girish

  • CORUPROC is not doing "Actual-Cost Calculation" - still in CO1P.

    Hello friends,
    As per SAP documentation, and many SCN posts I went through - all of them said CORUPROC is the program to run as batch job, and CO1P is its equivalent online transaction.  In my quality system, I see CORUPROC is not doing the "Actual-Cost Calculation" - and even if I execute CORUPROC online (through SE38), it is not clearing them. (It is clearing the goods movement entries).  CO1P still shows all the order/operation awaiting actual cost calculations.  If I select them in CO1P, and click <save>, they are cleared.
    So can someone guide me how can I make CORUPROC to do the actual cost calculation please.
    Thanks,
    - Chetan

    Hi
    I would expect to have this record processed by report CORUPROC.
    It's quite easy to analyze this program in debug. Set a break-point on the line below:
    IF NOT g_costs IS INITIAL
    Now follow the program execution until function module CO_RB_POST_ACTUAL_COSTS is called. If the function module is called, check if it was executed correctly reading the value of variable SY-SUBRC.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Actual Cost Sheet - Controlling

    Hi All,
    My client is mfg API (active pharmaceutical ingredients) products, whereby in process of mfg, at every stage "Mother Liquior" comes out of the reactor (A residue which can be purified and used further for production).
    Now since mother liquior is an output of the process in stage of mfg, its quantity in BOM is negative (e.g  -200 Litres).
    While taking cost estimate with costing variant (i.e actual cost sheet), even if material master contains price of the mother liquior, system throws error specifying "No price can be determined for Material XXXXXXX/batch/Plant".
    Requesting you all to find a solution to this.
    Regards,
    Anktia

    Hi Deva,
    I have cheked the config for my costing variant for Actual Cost Sheet. The Priority given is:
    1. Purchase Price
    2. Moving Average Price
    3. Standard Price.
    Now even when SP is available in Material Master, it does not consider it and as MAP is not there, it throws the error "no price could be determined for material/batch XXXXXX"
    Regards,
    Ankita

  • Actual Cost Opening Balance Variation

    During deployment time rough opening balance amount given(Actual Cost)...now need to add the variation..if it is addition, v can use pre-approved expenditure(PAE) batches and pass the respective task value....but in case of negative values...how to go about it...
    Is it possible to pass negative amount via PAE batches??(violation occurred)
    i can find 1 reverse button on the main page of PAE..how can i utilize it?????...could any 1 help me with 1 e.g Plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..
    Thanks a lot in advance...

    Hi
    Reviewing the Project Costing User Guide you can find the following:
    Reversing an Expenditure Batch_
    The Reverse button is enabled only if the current batch is released. In addition, an
    expenditure batch can be reversed only if the transaction source of the batch allows
    adjustments.
    When you reverse an expenditure batch, all the expenditure items are reversed except
    the following:
    • Related items
    • Expenditure items that have already been reversed
    • Reversing items (net zero adjusted items)
    • Expenditure items that were created as a result of a transfer adjustment
    To reverse an expenditure batch:
    1. Navigate to the Find Expenditure Batches window.
    2. Find the batch that you want to reverse.
    3. In the Expenditure Batches window, choose Reverse.
    4. In the Reverse an Expenditure Batch window, enter the name of the new reversing
    batch and choose OK .
    When the reversal is complete, Oracle Projects displays the number of items that
    were adjusted and the number of items that were rejected.
    end of text.
    Dina

  • Actual Costing (PWAC)

    Hi
    Is it, in Actual costing with PWAC Perpetual Weighted Average Cost are same with Standar Costing since the cost is same through out the period.
    please explain in detail Actual costing with PWAC and Standard costing.
    Thanks
    Raj

    All Periodic Costing will have the same cost throughout the period.
    Standard Costing -- We determine the raw material cost, and the Finished Good cost is rolled up based on best fitting Recipe/Formula/Routing.
    PWAC - Raw Material Cost is computed based on actual transactions (Purchase Receipt, Inv. Transfer, Actual Cost Adjustment etc). Finished Good cost is computed based on Production Batches and any other actual transaction and it would be averaged to arrive at the PWAC cost.
    Thanks,
    Dinesh

  • Report  for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
    there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
    I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    RK

    Dear experts,
    I am still looking for a revert.
    regards
    RK

  • Actual Cost of finished goods in MIGO

    Hi,
    The value of Finished material in FI Document generated in MIGO takes the (Goods Receipt Quantity) X (Planned/Moving average Price from material master), Where as it should take the Total Actual Price calculated after Order Confirmation Based on Actual Material Purchase Price & Actual Activity Posting Value.
    For example:
    Present scenario
    Material-> MIGO QTY>Moving Avg Price -->MIGO FI Document Value
    Finished> 1000  EA> Rs. 10/ EA--
    >Rs. 10,000=00
    Required Scenario:
    MIGO FI Document value= (Purchase Value of Raw Material)+ ((Activity Posted while Confirmation)X(Activity price))
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    What u said is right Mr Kapil.. See when u do GR From Production Order System Calculate Moving Price or Planned Price from
    material Matser .
    As per ur Reuirement u told it should calculate (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD).
    it is possible only when order quantity is less , suppose say your order qty is 150 mt per day and your Plant capacity is 500mt
    per day production will be done in a half day, sale can be done on same day after Production with the formula what u told.
    If suppose say , Your order is 2000 ton of Oil , it will take u to complete 4 days for your Total production as you told, GR should
    be done on (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD) formula, you dont know exact activity price for 2000 ton until u finish your total
    production, at the same time until u do GR sales cannot be done. So in SAP Gr is intially done on Moving Average Or Planned
    (Standard Price) , After totla Prodcution GR is Compared with Actual Cost(Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD)= :"Variance".
    Plus are MInus is Reduced or added to Finished Goods Account or PP account during Settlement.
    If any wrong Pls Correct me Experts,
    Pavan

  • Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

    Hi All
    For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
    However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
    Thank you

    Hi
    Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
    During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
    However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Break Up of Actual Costs in a report for list of orders

    Hi All,
    SAP standard reports displays only the total planned & total actual costs.
    Is there any standard report available which can display break up of planned & actual costs along with total costs, for list of orders (e.g: time, material and external resources consumption).
    Thanks in advance
    JK

    hi
    you can find the material cost,external service etc in the standard cost report itself select the change layout and select the items you want to display ,you can get the result
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • PS (plan vs actual costs) Report

    Hi,
    I have to generate the above report. How can I diffrentiate between Plan cost and actual cost. Is there any business contect report for this ? can anybody throw light on this.
    Regards,
    Bill

    Hi Bill,
               There is no std content for this as far as I know , Not sure if your report is based on cost for a given version then its really a mystery . If you are looking to pull the cost for PS then check the table RPSCO in r3 , this is the PS cost table , and you can differentiate Plan/Actual based on the Field Value type .
    hope this helps ,

  • Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

    Hello Gurus,
    Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
    Thanks
    RG

    Hi Raghu,
    After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
    Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
    If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
    Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
    You will be able to get the comparison...
    Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • PS - Report on Planned v/s actual cost of the project

    Hi,
    I have a client requirement on the above subject. In Report S_ALR_87013542, Under actual cost the system is taking both the Revenue and Actual cost booked on the project. Is there any other report wherein the system shows only the actual cost booked on the project so that planned V/s Actual can be compared.
    Rgds,
    Prasad

    Hi,
    You can also refer the report S_ALR_87013543 - Actual/Plan/Variance Absolute/Variance %. This will give the reports based on cost elements. Morever plan cost Vs actual cost can be obtained from Project Infosystem report (CN41/ CNS41).
    In fact the report S_ALR_87013533 is a hiecherachical report for plan & actual cost of project.
    If the system is calculating wrongly both revenue & actual cost under actual then you need to check Cost elements asignments & value category details.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

  • Planned vs Actual Cost Report (with variance) for PM Orders

    Hi Experts,
    We are using the project system to collate order costs for annual shut work.  We have a requirement for a report to show 25% variance between planned and actual order costs (maintneance order).
    At this stage, we dont mind whether this is implemented in the the PM system, or the PS system.
    This is a fairly basic / common requirment.  Are there any standard transactions we could use to:
    1.  Select a list of orders using standard selection criteria.
    2.  Select a % for variance, e.g. 25%
    3.  Display a list of orders where the planned vs actual costs were greater than 25% and what the actual variance is for each order?
    Thanks,
    Maikel

    Hi Maikel,
                   I have never seen any such scenario, but the best thing that can come to me is for the shut down activities you muct have created a Revision, then based on that Revision you can take a dump of all the orders with Planned and Actual Cost, in the excel, and there by putting the formulae you can definitely have the Varience report.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • Breakdown of  COGS into ACTUAL cost components

    Hello,
    I am looking to design a product cost report which gives breakdown of COGS into actual cost components. We use moving average cost for all materials (purchased as well as manufactured) in a make to order environment.
    For example:
    Sales order - Shipped material A at COGS $100.
    Process order # 1 produced material A using input material B and a series of operations defined in a recipe.
    Process order # 1 costs: Input material B - $70
    Operations cost - $30
    Process order # 2 produced material B using raw material C and a series of operations.
    Process order # 2 costs: Input material C - $40
    Operations cost - $30
    So, the results should look like COGS 100 comprise of $ 40 material cost and $ 60 operations cost.
    I understand standard cost estimates can be linked to CO-PA fields to get cost component structure. But, we don't use standard costing. We use CO-PA which gives COGS.
    Is there something similar to cost estimate to calculate as above? Or, this is a custom development.
    Thanks in advance for any pointers / advice?
    Sanjiv Agrawal

    What is COGS?

Maybe you are looking for