AGR_USERS, but for users with reference user assigned

Hi...
How do I get a complete list is "Users By Role" when a large number of users only have roles via a reference user?
Table AGR_USERS does not list these roles!
/vitofava

Hi,
S_BCE_68001400 (rsusr002) and select your users by the assigned reference user.(4th selection field)
b.rgds, Bernhard

Similar Messages

Issue material for Subcontracting with reference to PO for multiple batches

Hi All,
Issue: I want to issue 5-6 materials with reference to PO which have multiple batches. How can that be done?
Thus, if my raw material in stock are:
mat X   Batch 1    50 nos
mat X   Batch 2    40 nos
mat X   Batch 3     30 nos
mat Y Batch 6    10 nos
mat Y Batch 7    10 nos
mat Y Batch 8    10 nos
mat Y Batch 9    10 nos
i f for semi finished material A, sub contractor order 45000009 is created, where raw material required are:
Mat X      100 nos
Mat Y      30 nos
then how can I issue the raw materials wrt PO, and select multiple batches at the same time, without user entering the material again and again.
I have gone through the SDN multiple times to see the probable solution exists, but I have not received any solution.
Regards,
Ankush

DO MB1B transaction, with Movement type 541,
Enter the material with different Batches for required qty. as different line items.
e.g
line item 1 : mat X Batch 1 50 nos
line item 2 : mat X Batch 2 40 nos
line item 3 : mat X Batch 3 10 nos
line item 4: mat Y Batch 6 10 nos
line item 5 : mat Y Batch 7 10 nos
line item 6 : mat Y Batch 8 10 nos
Edited by: sudhansu satapathy on Oct 21, 2011 7:29 PM

Pricing procedure for order with reference from order

Dear Friends,
If I create a sales order with reference to another sales order of different type, the pricing procedure is copied too.
But I would to use another pricing procedure for second document
I found the oss note 14136 but this is for reference from invoce
I tried to create new data transfer routine for orders in copy from 51, but does not work
Can you help me??
thanks
best regards
GdA

> If I create a sales order with reference to another sales order of different type, the pricing procedure is copied too. But I would to use another pricing procedure for second document,
Based on my understanding of query.
You are looking for a different pricing procedure in second doc.
For instance, the PricProc for SalesDoc1 is ZPR001 and the PricProc for SalesDoc2 is ZPR002, in addition to that, you want SalesDoc1 to become reference doc for SalesDoc2.
For this, ZPR002 & ZPR001 should have common base price condition type and rest pricing can change.
And for maintaining different Pricing Procedure with similar combination of sales area for SalesDoc1 & SalesDoc2, maintain different document pricing procedure for both docs and maintain Pricing procedure accordingly..
Thanks & Regards
J Prakash

Internal Order Budget Check for PO with reference to PR / RFQ

Hi All,
I have a scenario where the budget availability control is not working for PO created with reference to PR or RFQ. While creating the PO if i modify the PO value more than RFQ or PR value then system is looking for budget control.
If we create a direct PO system is checking for Budget control where the PO value is more than availability budget.
We have the budget control check with internal order for services and non stock material based on substitution rule created for cost element group and cost center group.
In tolerance limits budget availability control we have not activated for PR, itu2019s activated from PO.
Kindly let me know what is the reason for budget availability control is not active where the PO is created with reference to PR or RFQ.
Thanks & Regards,
Rama Mohan

493900 - FAQ: Release Strategy:
It is not possible to create a purchase order if the referenced purchase requisition is not released. But the system allows you to put the purchase order on hold and then release the purchase requisition.
On the other hand you can create a purchase order with reference to an unreleased request of quotation.

Include Phase for Phase with role task assignment in cProjects

Hi,
When I include a Phase with different tasks and the tasks with Role assignment in to a project, the task-role assignment is not gettting copied.
But when I use a Project template with the same Phase-task-Role task assignments, every thing is getting copied. But for Include phase the task-role assignments are not getting copied.
Can anybody help me how to achieve this functionality?
Thanks and regards,
Jashua

Hi Matthias,
Thank you very much for your reply.
Here I have a question. Because the method ''SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_COPYING' of the class 'CL_DPR_TASK' is being called in the both cases Create project from template and include a phase in to an existing project. So, if I implement the BAdI method I think it would effect both the times. wouldn't it create the role task assignments twice at the time of project creation.
Also please give me some more details about creating the role-task assignments in this BAdI.
Thanks and regards,
Jashua
Edited by: Jashua Andra on Jan 4, 2012 12:42 PM

Funds Management for PO with reference to a PR

Hello,
I'd like to check the system's behavior on the next issue:
Letu2019s say I have a funds reservation for $18,000,000.00 and I create a purchase requisition with one item with reference to this funds reservation for an amount of $17,000,000.00.
Then I create a purchase order with one item, making reference to the purchase requisition for $10,000,000.00.
At the moment I have availability in the reserve of $1,000,000.00 and a commitment (also pre-commitment) of $17,000,000.00 ($10,000,000.00 from the purchase order and $7,000,000 from the requisition).
If I later (after I had saved) try to update the purchase order item increasing its net value, for example in more than one million (exceding the reserve's available amount), the systems generates an availability control error indicating that I donu2019t have enough funds in the funds reservation (which its true).
My question concerning the systemu2019s behavior is, doesnu2019t it recognize the fact that the PO is referenced to a PR, therefore being able to consider also the remaining amount of the PR as a funds source for the increased value of the PO item (instead of only the reservation available amount)?
If I make a new PO with reference to the same position of the PR, I can do it for the whole available value (funds reservation + PR), and the system makes the necessary reduction for the PR at funds level.
However, as I mentioned before, if I increase the value of the PO item it only recognizes the available amount in the funds reservation as a funds source to AVC check.
Iu2019d like to know if this is a right behavior and if there's a way to make the system use the amount commited in the Purchase requisition, to be able to increase the item in the PO, making the necessary reduction in the PR and funds reservation (BUT RECONIZING BOTH FUNDS RESERVATION AND PURCHASE REQUISITION AS POSSIBLE SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR THE INCREASE, INSTEAD OF ONLY THE AMOUNT AVAILABLE IN THE RESERVATION, DURING THE AVC CHECK).
In the activity "Define Activation of Availability Control" is specified "Active with usual check logic".
Kind regards,
Edited by: Víctor Domínguez on Mar 9, 2009 7:20 PM
Edited by: Víctor Domínguez on Mar 9, 2009 7:21 PM
Edited by: Víctor Domínguez on Mar 9, 2009 7:21 PM

Thanks for your answer, but I'm using type C (Active with usual check logic) for the fiscal year in question (2009).
But the system is only checking the available amount in the funds reservation when I increase the value in the purchase orde item, it doesn't try to decrease the value of the purchase requisition, which still has a $7,000,000 commitment, in order to be able to use that as funds to be able to increase the value in the PO. That's what I don't know if it's a normal system behavior or it could be something in the customizing to help me solve this issue (bear in mind that I'm updating the purchase order, because when I create the PO there's no problem or even creating a new one with reference to the PR, it let's me use not only the amount available in the funds reservation, but also the commitment in the PR as available funds for my PO).
I wouldn't want to decrease the value of the purchase requisition to be able to increase the availability in the funds reservation (so I could increase the PO item value), because it has been released and approved. And I can't either fix the "closed" indicator on the requisition to release commitment, because the remaining value of the requisition could be used to create other purchase orders.
Edited by: Víctor Domínguez on Mar 9, 2009 10:04 PM

Release Strategies for PR with Characteristics Account assignment

Dear All,
Please let me know how to set rel.strategy for PR with Account assignment as a characteristics.
I tried with Account assignment and Document type as a characteristics but Rel.stst is not triggering.
Please help.
Thank you
regards
Amar

Hi,
I have created Charac A/c assigment with fied name KNTTP ,maintained the vaue as A and also assined to class. And other characteristics used are plant and docment type.
But REL STAT is not triggering.
Please suggest some input.
Thanks in advance
Amar

Report generation for users assigned to Function

Hi friends,
We require an report should consist of the following contents.
Usr ID(Mandaory) | First name(optional) | Last name(optional) | Function(mandatory).
We are not able access USER_ADDRS table which gives all this datas. So, We are looking for other options.
Any inputs or suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
With kind regards
Karthick
SST Team

Hi Gilles,
Thanks for your suggestion.
But can you please tell me how to add the field 'Function' in SUIM-User by complex selection criteria?. Because we dont have any option like 'Function' in SUIM-User by complex selection criteria.
With kind regards
Karthick

Executable loads for Admin but for user has DLL complaints

Hi All,
When they give imbeciles handicap-parking, I won't have so far to walk!

Please refer to this thread instead!
- Philip Courtois, Thinkbot Solutions

Effects of Goods Receipt for PO with A/C assignment to Network?

Dear All,
Does anyone know what is the effect in the system after I posted a Goods Receipt for a Purchase order item with account assignment to a Network (Project Systems).
The account assignment is 'N' in the Purchase Order.
Best Regards,
Junwen

hi,
i know only assignment with "P"
-> it has an effect of the Budget and liability
(values in table rpsco)
Andreas

PC WF - Agent Determination for Items with Multiple Account Assignment

Hello Gurus!
The quoted text below is from [SAP Help Documentation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/ad/d8fd25beb64bbe9d671f3199eb7edf/content.htm]. I haven't been able to find any further documentation on how to implement this feature. Is this something the system can do without any BAdI implementations? Has anybody implemented this? How can this be accomplished? We are on SRM 7.0.
"You can distribute costs across accounts by percentage, by quantity, or by value. If the responsibility for approving items according to given accounting data is divided between several approvers, the system can create one work item for each approver. The item can only receive the status Approved after each approver has approved it. As soon as one approver rejects an item, the item receives the status Rejected."
Regards,
Ramki.

Hi,
SAP does not provide the standard Badi implementation to achieve your business requirement.. but you can refer enhancement implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_AGENTS_SC where you can find badi implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_SC_RR_PGRP is similar..
Saravanan

BAPI For CREATE SALES ORDER WITH REFERENCE TO ORDER

Hi ,
I want to develop a new RFC for 'Creating Sales Order' with reference to another sales order -
Is there any BAPI available for the same ? (Version 4.7) - I know its available for new create and change
but couldn't find for create with reference to Order ...
Thanks in advance ...
Regards
Rajesh.

Hi,
You can use this FM "/SAPNEA/SMAPI_ORDER_CREATE". I haven;t tried this but you can still give it a try. Mention the Reference Order Type and other data in the header work area and pass it to the FM.
Reward if it's useful.
Thanks,
Anil

Forgot password for users for whom challenge questions are not set

Hi,
I have a scenario here where initially the environment property for force setting challenge questions during first login was not set to true.
But it has been set to true later. But for users created prior setting this property to true, the forgot password link is taking to a page to answer challenge questions which obviously is not working.
Is there anyway to handle this scenario without doing ADF customization? For example say, to force all previous users also to set challenge questions for whom the challenge questions are not set.

Hi, In your scenario, since user has forgotten his/her password and he has not set his answers to questions, so the only option left is calling Help Desk. Help desk guys should educate end users that go to OIM->My Information -> Set Security Questions. This is the only easy way I can think of.
HTH,
~Abhishek

Calendar Publishing not working for users moved to new PO

We got the Calendar Publishing working, and it's a treat, very nice integration to our Intranet, teaming etc.
But for users that has a published calendar, and is then moved, the publishing fails!
I've set the loglevel for the Calpub to diagnostic, and I see this:
15:28:00, <GWCAL>, -, INFO, -, Sending request to POA:
GET /calendar/a2VmQHBpaGwtYXMuZGs_Y249NEI4RTY5MTUuJCQkLiQkJC4xMD AuMTI0MjQyNC4xLjIxNTIuMQ= HTTP/1.1
Host: gw4.as.dk
User-Agent: com.novell.gw.calhost.PoaConnection
X-GW-CalHost-Id: THluZ2J5
15:28:00, <GWCAL>, -, INFO, -, POA Response:
Location: http://gw8.as.dk:7171/calendar/a2VmQ...4xLjIxNTIuMQ==
<html><head><title>Moved</title></head><body>Requested resource has moved</body></html>
HTTP/1.1 500
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:28:00 GMT
Server: Linux GroupWise POA 8.0.1
Content-Type: text/html
Pragma: no-cache
15:28:00, <GWCAL>, -, INFO, -, Requesting data from POA. Userid: KEF, Calendar: Rejser, Status: 301
So first of, it connects to PO4 without problems, then PO8 where it finds the user (correctly), and then it gives an error when trying to access the calendar.
The calendar has been 'unpublished'/'republished' but the URL doesn't change.
I can create a new calendar, and move the appointments there, and then it works, but it's not a solution of course :-)

Hi,
Had the same problem today.
Is there a fix or workaround? (GW 801HP2)
Regards
Martin
Originally Posted by fribert
We got the Calendar Publishing working, and it's a treat, very nice integration to our Intranet, teaming etc.
But for users that has a published calendar, and is then moved, the publishing fails!
I've set the loglevel for the Calpub to diagnostic, and I see this:
15:28:00, <GWCAL>, -, INFO, -, Sending request to POA:
GET /calendar/a2VmQHBpaGwtYXMuZGs_Y249NEI4RTY5MTUuJCQkLiQkJC4xMD AuMTI0MjQyNC4xLjIxNTIuMQ= HTTP/1.1
Host: gw4.as.dk
User-Agent: com.novell.gw.calhost.PoaConnection
X-GW-CalHost-Id: THluZ2J5
15:28:00, <GWCAL>, -, INFO, -, POA Response:
Location: http://gw8.as.dk:7171/calendar/a2VmQ...4xLjIxNTIuMQ==
<html><head><title>Moved</title></head><body>Requested resource has moved</body></html>
HTTP/1.1 500
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:28:00 GMT
Server: Linux GroupWise POA 8.0.1
Content-Type: text/html
Pragma: no-cache
15:28:00, <GWCAL>, -, INFO, -, Requesting data from POA. Userid: KEF, Calendar: Rejser, Status: 301
So first of, it connects to PO4 without problems, then PO8 where it finds the user (correctly), and then it gives an error when trying to access the calendar.
The calendar has been 'unpublished'/'republished' but the URL doesn't change.
I can create a new calendar, and move the appointments there, and then it works, but it's not a solution of course :-)

Reference and Assignment Synchronization Report for FBL5N Transaction

is ther any standard report for ...Reference and Assignment Synchronization Report for FBL5N Transaction.

Hi,
FBL5N is a standard TCode which is used to see Open, Cleared and All line items of customer as per company code.Line items means whatever transaction has been posted to the customer.
These line items may be related to invoices raised against the customer, payments received from customer and advance receipt from customer.
Hope you have understood
Regards
Tapan

AGR_USERS, but for users with reference user assigned

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for