Ambient CPU Temperature readings don't change until reboot

Hi everyone,
It's been a good while since I last posted on this forum and much has changed since...
I have recently bought a second hand "Early 2005" DP 2.7 Ghz G5 Powermac and everything has been working perfectly for the last couple of months - no traces of liquid coolant spills or odd fan behaviour so far (fingers crossed). I was just hoping to compare experiences with other users concerning the following behaviour though:
When I boot the machine from cold, both "iStat" or "Temperature Monitor" agree and correctly show the ambient temperature readings for both CPUs at actual room temperature as expected, which is usually 23ºC. This value doesn't get updated after hours of use until I reboot no matter into which OS. It will then show an updated value - usually ~40ºC which seems reasonably accurate.
I can replicate this in Tiger (10.4.11) and Leopard (10.5.8) using the same versions of both apps so it would seem as though the ambient temperature sensors only get read once at boot time rather than being polled at intervals like the the remaining sensors (HDD, CPU core, Backside and Drive Bay).
Has anyone else ever noticed this behaviour?
These are my usual temperature readings and fan speeds in "Reduced" processor performance, for future reference:
!http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z126/thearchit/Apple%20Forum/iStatscreen01.png!
Cheers!

Hello The hatter,
(WARNING: long post!)
As previously mentioned, when I set this machine up I decided to have all three Operating Systems on it, since some apps may be compatible with one but not the other, and with 2TB of available space I couldn't see a reason why not to, so I proceeded with a fresh install of Panther, Tiger and Leopard.
I use Leopard for web and email, and Panther for audio recording. Tiger remains largely unused. Ok, I confess to have played Call of Duty 2 once - for testing purposes, of course
As the described behaviour occurs for both CPU Ambient Sensors, I'm ruling out any hardware defects. It could be something at a lower hardware level, Open Firmware, or limited OS API support. (i.e - AppleAD741x .kext)
Quite possibly, fan/pump thermal management doesn't care about readings from CPU ambient sensors. They may be there merely for informational purposes. For example, there is also a 3rd room temperature ambient sensor placed at the front of the tower, right beneath the front speaker/fan assembly that I've not seen it listed in either "Temperature Monitor" or "iStat", hence my reasoning that it is possible that the OS is actually polling these sensors on wake and bootup, but there may be no way of polling them manually on runtime due to the aforementioned API limitations or else.
I could contact the developers of iStat and Temperature Monitor to find out what they may know about it, as they are probably best placed to answer queries like these apart from Apple themselves, of course. But I hesitate about bothering them, as I haven't made any contributions and they have already given so much to the community for free.
I really wish that someone could test this to confirm it is expected behaviour. i.e. CPU ambient sensors only get polled at system boot or wake from sleep.
I've run iostat -l using the terminal and something caught my eye.
I'm guessing this should be the main object definition for all CPU B's hardware sensors. There's an interesting "platform-do-reset-on-wake" parameter:
(output clipped to 80 lines width)
| | | +-o supply-monitor@5a <class PPCI2CInterface, registered, matche$
| | | | | {
| | | | | "#address-cells" = <00000001>
| | | | | "hwsensor-zone" = <0000000000000000000000000000000000000000$
| | | | | "hwsensor-type" = <","adc","adc","adc">
*| | | | | "platform-do-reset-on-wake" = <0000000010000000000000000000$*
| | | | | "hwsensor-location" = <"hwsensor-id" = <0000000f00000010000000110000001200000013>
| | | | | "AAPL,phandle" = <ff989230>
| | | | | "hwsensor-polling-period" = <0000000a0000000a0000000a000000$
| | | | | "built-in" =
| | | | | "hwsensor-params-version" = <00000001>
| | | | | "name" = <" = <">
| | | | | "compatible" = <" = <0000005a>
| | | | | "#size-cells" = <00000000>
| | | | | }
Presumably, AMB stands for "Ambient" and ADC for "Analog Devices" Controller, the sensor manufacturer, most likely.
AD1 looks like this, and AD2,3,4 look the same:
| | | | +-o adc-sensor <class IOService, registered, matched, active$
| | | | | | {
| | | | | | "zone" = <00000000>
| | | | | | "location" = "CPU B AD7417 AD1"
| | | | | | "name" = <" = <">
| | | | | | "polling-period" = <0000000a>
| | | | | | "compatible" = <" = <00000001>
| | | | | | "type" = "adc"
| | | | | | "sensor-id" = <00000010>
| | | | | | }
| | | | | |
| | | | | +-o IOHWSensor <class IOHWSensor, registered, matched, act$
| | | | | {
| | | | | "IOProbeScore" = 0
| | | | | "current-value" = 575
| | | | | "CFBundleIdentifier" = "com.apple.driver.AppleHWSenso$
| | | | | "polling-period-ns" = 18446744073709551615
| | | | | "IOPropertyMatch" = {"device_type"="adc-sensor"}
| | | | | "IOMatchCategory" = "IODefaultMatchCategory"
| | | | | "version" = 1
| | | | | "type" = "adc"
| | | | | "IOPowerManagement" = {"CurrentPowerState"=1}
| | | | | "IOProviderClass" = "IOService"
| | | | | "zone" = <00000000>
| | | | | "location" = "CPU B AD7417 AD1"
| | | | | "polling-period" = 18446744073709551615
| | | | | "IOClass" = "IOHWSensor"
| | | | | "sensor-id" = 16
| | | | | }
| | | | |
Interestingly, after parsing "ioreg -l" output further, I can find objects for every sensor available to "iStat" when looking for its exact name, for example "Backside", "U3 Heatsink", "Drive Bay":
| | | +-o temp-monitor@98 <class PPCI2CInterface, registered, matched,$
| | | | | {
| | | | | "platform-do-set-conversion-rate" = <0000000090000000000000$
| | | | | "#address-cells" = <00000001>
| | | | | "hwsensor-zone" = <0000000400000004>
| | | | | "hwsensor-type" = <">
*| | | | | "hwsensor-location" = <">*
| | | | | "external-high-limit" = <00000055>
| | | | | "hwsensor-id" = <0000000600000007>
| | | | | "AAPL,phandle" = <ff9794f8>
| | | | | "internal-high-limit" = <00000055>
| | | | | "hwsensor-polling-period" = <0000000a0000000a>
| | | | | "built-in" =
| | | | | "hwsensor-params-version" = <00000001>
| | | | | "internal-low-limit" = <0000000a>
| | | | | "platform-do-set-limits" = <0000000010000000000000000000000$
| | | | | "name" = <" = <">
| | | | | "compatible" = <" = <00000098>
| | | | | "external-low-limit" = <0000000a>
| | | | | "#size-cells" = <00000000>
| | | | | }
| | | | |
| | | +-o temp-monitor@94 <class PPCI2CInterface, registered, matched,$
| | | | | {
| | | | | "#address-cells" = <00000001>
| | | | | "hwsensor-zone" = <00000001>
| | | | | "hwsensor-type" = <" = <">*
| | | | | "hwsensor-id" = <00000004>
| | | | | "AAPL,phandle" = <ff978b90>
| | | | | "hwsensor-polling-period" = <0000000a>
| | | | | "built-in" =
| | | | | "hwsensor-params-version" = <00000001>
| | | | | "name" = <" = <">
| | | | | "compatible" = <" = <00000094>
| | | | | "#size-cells" = <00000000>
| | | | | }
| | | | |
These PowerPC machines are amazing! Looks like there's fun to be had studying the IOKit framework. I'll post any findings.
Cheers

Similar Messages

  • G41M-P25 / HW monitor F71889F - incorrect CPU temperature readings?

    My old mainboard blew up (literally, the capacitators leaked) and I had it replaced with a G41M-P25. The tech guy also put a new CPU cooler on the board because for whatever reason he decided that my old one wouldn´t fit. From then on my PC became extremely unstable, according to various monitor programs the CPU temperature was ca. 60°C in idle mode and went up to 85°C (!) within 2 minutes with full CPU load then the board would shut down.
    I went back to the store and complained and got a stronger cooler. The system runs stable now, but the CPU temperature readings are still quite high: ca. 50°C in idle, up to 68°C with full load. I double-checked the values in the BIOS monitor and it shows the same temperatures. But the heat sink is cool (way below body temperature) and when I touch the spot where it is sitting on the CPU it is cool, too.
    So... what are the chances that the HW monitor is reporting an incorrect CPU temperature? Is there any known issue with the mainboard G41M-P25 and the built in HW monitor Fintek F71889F? SpeedFan also reports quite high temperatures for "temp2" under full load (up to 80-90°C), which seems to be the mosfet temperature - but I know that SpeedFan is not completely to be trusted. I just worry about the CPU temperature, according to the Intel datasheet it should be ca. 63°C at most.
    My system:
    Mainboard MSI G41M-P25
    CPU Intel Pentium D 2.8GHz
    The Pentium D is known for getting hot fast, but on the other hand the cooler is already pretty strong and like I said a touch test revealed that the area near the CPU is way below body temperature, so nowhere near 68°C. In comparison the temperature reported for my graphics card is 50-60°C which seems to be correct because it actually is hot and the air surrounding it is warm, too. Should I just ignore the temperature readings? Or is this a problem which can possibly be fixed with a BIOS update? Or maybe complain again and have the mainboard replaced?

    Well, I used Speedfan. Problem is when under load temp2 hits about 80°C thermal throttling occurs which makes my processor useless for gaming. Because of that, I changed processor for my old P4 3,0GHz and OC'ed it a little (@3,27GHz). Temps are similiar, but lower than 80°C. Here is log from Speedfan after 2 mins CPU torture:
    Quote
    Seconds   GPU   CPU   Temp1   Temp2   Core
    61244   51,0   43,25   50,0   50,0   51,0
    61247   51,0   43,25   51,0   51,0   51,0
    61250   51,0   43,25   53,0   54,0   51,0
    61253   51,0   43,25   54,0   54,0   51,0
    61256   51,0   43,25   53,0   54,0   51,0
    61259   51,0   43,0   54,0   55,0   51,0
    61263   51,0   43,25   54,0   56,0   51,0
    61265   51,0   43,25   54,0   56,0   51,0
    61269   51,0   43,0   54,0   56,0   51,0
    61272   51,0   43,25   54,0   57,0   51,0
    61275   51,0   43,25   53,0   57,0   51,0
    61278   51,0   43,25   51,0   56,0   51,0
    61281   51,0   43,25   50,0   55,0   51,0
    61284   51,0   43,25   50,0   54,0   51,0
    61287   51,0   43,25   50,0   54,0   51,0
    61290   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61293   51,0   43,0   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61296   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61299   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61302   51,0   43,25   50,0   53,0   51,0
    61305   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61308   51,0   43,0   49,0   52,0   51,0
    61311   51,0   43,25   50,0   52,0   51,0
    61314   51,0   43,25   49,0   52,0   51,0
    61318   51,0   43,0   50,0   52,0   51,0
    61321   51,0   43,0   50,0   53,0   51,0
    61324   51,0   43,25   52,0   53,0   51,0
    61327   51,0   43,25   56,0   56,0   51,0
    61330   51,0   43,25   56,0   57,0   51,0
    61333   51,0   43,25   58,0   60,0   51,0
    61336   51,0   43,25   58,0   61,0   51,0
    61339   51,0   43,25   58,0   63,0   51,0
    61342   51,0   43,25   59,0   67,0   51,0
    61345   51,0   43,5   59,0   65,0   51,0
    61348   51,0   43,5   59,0   65,0   51,0
    61351   51,0   43,25   59,0   66,0   51,0
    61354   51,0   43,5   60,0   67,0   51,0
    61357   51,0   43,25   59,0   68,0   51,0
    61360   51,0   43,25   59,0   69,0   51,0
    61363   51,0   43,5   59,0   70,0   51,0
    61367   51,0   43,5   60,0   71,0   51,0
    61370   51,0   43,25   60,0   71,0   51,0
    61373   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61376   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61379   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61382   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61385   51,0   43,5   60,0   74,0   51,0
    61388   51,0   43,5   60,0   74,0   51,0
    61391   51,0   43,5   60,0   75,0   51,0
    61394   51,0   43,5   60,0   75,0   51,0
    61397   51,0   43,5   60,0   76,0   51,0
    61400   51,0   43,5   60,0   76,0   51,0
    61403   51,0   43,5   60,0   76,0   51,0
    61406   51,0   43,5   60,0   77,0   51,0
    61409   51,0   43,75   60,0   77,0   51,0
    61412   51,0   43,5   60,0   77,0   51,0
    61416   51,0   43,75   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61419   51,0   43,75   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61422   51,0   43,5   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61425   51,0   43,5   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61428   51,0   43,5   60,0   79,0   51,0
    61431   51,0   43,75   61,0   79,0   51,0
    61434   51,0   43,75   61,0   79,0   51,0
    61437   51,0   43,75   60,0   79,0   51,0
    61440   51,0   43,75   60,0   79,0   51,0
    Also, my CPU cooler is Scythe Katana III and it's installed properly.

  • Downloaded items don't show until reboot.

    Hello,
    When I have downloaded something from the internet, for example a pdf file, it doesn't show. After rebooting the files are available to open, does anyone know how to solve this? Thanks

    You need to fill in the "Album" info for the songs in order to have them appaer on your iPod under "Artists."

  • How Far Off Is the CPU Temperature On A K9N6PGM2-V (MS-7309) Motherboard?

    I have read on other sites that these boards have inaccurate cpu temperature readings in the bios. I am wondering how much these temperatures are off, if they even are. I have an AMD Athlon X2 4200+, Bios version 9.2. Thanks for your help.

    Quote from: hunterman439 on 28-March-09, 22:54:04
    Thanks for all replys,
    Sometimes when I turn the computer on and go into the Bios the cpu temperature is already at about 115F. This isn't terrible or anything, but it seems a little hot for just starting the computer.
    115 Fahrenheit = 46,1111111 graden celsius
    That's quite normal, nothing to worry about, BIOS temps are always a bit higher then idle temps.
    Please use C as everybody uses that in the forum, thanks.

  • X300 CPU temperatur​e readings

    Hi all,
    I'm getting ready to send in my X300 for repair, but before I do that, I was wondering if you could help - I purchased my x300 in part because it was supposed to be a silent and cool machine, but no matter my power scheme, the fan constantly spins up to at least 5100 rpm, and when it does spin up, it sounds like a (tiny) jet engine. It is in no ways loud, but it does get annoying in a quiet work environment.
    My question is this: what do your x300s idle at? At first I thought that the fan was faulty, but now I think that mine might have a problem with too much/too little thermal grease which leads to the fan being overworked. Using Intel Thermal Analysis Tool or TPFancontrol, my machine quickly (within 3 minutes of turning on) climbs up to 50c even when at idle and fan at 2000 rpm. It doesn't matter if I'm at at 800 MHZ (Maximum Battery life Power Scheme) or 1200 (Maximum Performance). If I'm at Maximum battery life, the fan will kick up to level 2, go back to 1 every minute or so. When I'm at Maximum Performance, the fan runs constantly at level 2 (5100 RPM) and setttles in at around 47c. BTW, I'm running XP. Again, I'm at idle - processor usage is under 5%. I have no problem with the fan kicking in during heavy work, I just can't believe that this ULV processor running at 800 mhz idles this high. Does anyone have any temperature readings to relate to? I don't want to have my machine opened up if this is the norm, but I can't find many hard temperature readings online.
    Please help!
    Thanks,Volodar

    HI there.  You might find some good reference on AMD and Intel operating temperatures here.  Hope this helps out.  Your temp  seems to be in the range: http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000687.htm
    Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.

  • Temperature readings for me MBP 15". HELLLLLPPPPPPPPPP.

    Hello all,
    Done some temperature testing with my MacBook Pro, 15", 2.2ghz Intel Core Duo 2, 2GB Ram, MacOS 10.5.7
    Until recently my Mac fans performed perfectly. Always been very proud of the almost silent nature of all my Macs to date. I don´t load it too much, I use Mozilla running a streaming program, Mail, MSN and a Java Program which streams live information to my desktop - Nothing else is running when I get the problems. I do run a 24" Samsung from the DVI, and a 22" Samsung from a USB - DVI Adaptor (DisplayLink). I use the computer through the day every day.
    As I said, until recently the fans seemed to be normal, they did kick in now and then for a few minutes, normally though only if I opened Photoshop or Quark at the same time as the programs above - This I understand. Since very recently there has been a change, the fans run almost constantly now when I have the programs running, after about 10mins after start up, they run at 6000rpm and don´t stop until I put it to sleep. Sometimes it does this even with only Mozilla open. Not only does the noise of the constant 6000rpm get on my nerves, I am worried this is going to reduce the lifespan of the computer, and also worried there may be a hardware problem now that needs to be dealt with.
    When this is happening Activity Monitor says that there is plenty of CPU left to play with, normally there is more than 50% idle (70% normally to be accurate), with 700MB Free Ram and 300mb Inactive RAM .... so, only 1GB used.
    Really annoying. Have reset PRAM, done the recent "Fan Hardware Upgrade" (which I thought helped at first, but did not help at all), have checked in Activity Monitor to make sure there is nothing sucking up CPU, there isn´t... I have also reset the SMC . It seems ludicrous to me that the 10.5.7 update has caused this, but it seems it must have. Everything was fine before, now I feel like chucking the computer out the window and buying a new one, although I am worried I will get the same problem with a new 2009 MBP and considering this is only just over 1 year old, I can´t afford it anyway ....
    I have taken some temperature readings via iStat. I wonder if any of you can help me to try and resolve this problem ?
    I am wondering if this is a RAM issue, although there always seems to be plenty of actual RAM available as long as I do not open anything heavy along with the normal programs I use.... Could this is a Virtual RAM problem ? Any help appreciated.
    Thanks.
    1 / 2 / 3 / 4
    HD 27 / 45 / 31 / 38
    CPU 37 / 76 / 41 / 74
    Airport 34 / 61 / 38 / 60
    Enclosure 24 / 42 / 28 / 35
    GPU Diode 48 / 84 / 52 / 83
    GPU Heatsink 36 / 69 / 38 / 69
    Heatsink A 35 / 65 / 38 / 65
    Heatsink B 27 / 51 / 32 / 47
    Degrees Celcius.
    1 - Totally cold, standing overnight in ambient temperature. 2000rpm fan speed.
    2 - Temperatures when Fans have been on constantly for an hour or so. Mostly at 6000rpm.
    3- Temperatures when computer put to sleep for 10 minutes after fans have been constantly on. Fans back to 2000rpm upon wakeup.
    4- Temperatures after wake from sleep, 7-8 minutes after wake-up, fans on constantly again. At 3500rpm.

    Hi again Paul,
    Unfortunately SMC fan control has not worked. I was wondering how it would help to be honest, because my fans run at full speed all the time anyway (10 minutes after turning on anyway)...
    All this little program does it allow me to speed the fans up from normal, which is what I want to get away from to be honest - The fans never used to run all the time ! Using this program has increased the time that it took to get up to 6000 max, but only because I set a default at 3500rpm from startup so that it took longer to get up to its overheating temperature (as it normally starts from 2000rpm).
    Unless I am not using the program right ?

  • Dodgy temperature readings

    Hello, I'm running a K8N Neo Platinum board with an Athlon 64 3200+.
    Using Bios revision 1.3 (the latest)
    I am very happy with everything except the temperature readings.  I was concerned to see that both core center and nvidia system utility reported that my CPU was idling around 60 C +.  I was highly suspicious about this as the heatsink was not very hot and the temp seemed to be the same whether I was playing Doom3 or it was totally idle.
    I am using the stock AMD heatsink and fan, I know I could shave a few degrees off the core temp by using arctic silver and a better heatsink but frankly I am not interested in overclocking and can't be bothered.  I have one PCI exhaust fan and the two fan PSU pulling air out the case and a standard 8cm case fan pulling air in.  System temperature varies from 35-40 C depending on room temp and pc activity.
    I have noticed a few times that core center suddenly starts to report the true (or what seems to be the true) temperature which is 40-45 C.  I have no idea what prompts it to work or not to work.  When the cpu temp is reported incorrectly it seems to also prevent cool n quiet from kicking in.  I’ve just noticed now that when my system was idling and the temp correctly reported that corecenter reported it had underclocked to 1 ghz - I've never seen it do this when the cpu temp is reported in the 60s.
    Is this fixable in future bios upgrade or do I have a dodgy temp sensor?

    Quote
    Originally posted by Kurgan666
    Quote
    Originally posted by tazman2
    Ambient temp is 77F (25C) and the CPU temp is 48C at idle. I have a fan blowing in by the harddrives and a fan blowing out in the back of the case plus the Enermax PSU with dual fan blowing out.  No more room to add any more fans.  The exhaust fan is blowing pretty good amount of warm air, no sure if the intake fan is blowing in enogh air though.  I put one with a thermal sensor and maybe it is not blowing enough.  
    I don't know waht else you can try, your set up sounds very similar to mine and my system temp under heavy load reaches only 45/7 and idles around 40/2.
    I just flashed to 1.45 and it seems like I am getting the low low temps again, we'll see if this lasts any longer than  1.44.
    I am going to replace the fron fan with a non thermally controlled fan and see if I can get more airflow (maybe the existing fan is running too slow).  Other than that I am not sure as to what to do.  Are your case fans thermally controlled or are they running at max speed all the time?  How about your CPU fan, is it setup for a particular temp in the BIOS or is it setup to run at max all the time?
    Thanks,

  • 109°C (228°F) CPU temperature, fans idle @ 2k rpm!!!!!! I'M SO MAD

    this is a issue since the new MBPs were released. as soon as the CPU temp reaches ~55°C the fans start slowly from 2000 to 6200rpm if the CPU is on maximum usage. this is absolutely ok. BUT, if you put your MBP to sleep, log out or change the GPU, something happens to the fan control! the next time you maxing out your CPU power, the CPU heats up to 109°C and the fans keep running at 2000rpm if you reset your smc everything is fine until you put your MBP to sleep (...) again. seriously, what is this apple? this is so so unbelievably pathetic!
    the newest "placebo smc update" didn't change anything! it changed not even one thing what it promised, LOL! stop messing around apple and do* something!
    temperature issue
    15% more cpu usage if you play music over the integrated speakers
    display flickering with battery power, between 1-4 brightness
    trackpad which won't recognize your finger at the border
    ....

    Michael Flynn wrote:
    Did you try to reset the SMC, I had a similar issue where my brand new MBP's temps were increasing but the fan speed didn't move beyond 2k. Once I reset the SMC all was well. Additionall download SMCFanControl This handy little app will let you manually adjust the fan speeds. Depending on what I'm working on, I'll default the speeds to 2.5k or 3k (or faster if I'm working on an intensive task)
    hm read my post again please.
    never mind... ok this is important for me, so i will try to explain this again:
    1. on the first boot ever, everything is fine. the temps won't outreach the 80°C mark because the fans speed up properly.
    2. after a log out, sleep, GPU change and maybe (i didn't tested it) a restart/shutdown the fan control is FAULTY.
    3. the fans speed up VERY slow! the CPU reaches almost _110°C /230°F_! it keeps this temperature for ~2-3 minutes! then the fans slowly kick in and regulate the temperature between 85-91°C @ 4800rpm.
    4. so, if i reset the SMC i'll start again at 1. -> the fans work properly! BUT if i close my mac and open it again, maybe just 1min later, the fan control is faulty again... (2.)
    btw: i get this crazy temperatures only with programms that stress the CPU, i don't want to know what happens if i activate the 9600m GT an stress it synchrounus with the CPU... (spoiler: nuclear meltdown)
    and no, i won't install a app which regulates my temperatures. i don't want to swallow all this pathetic bugs that apple dishes me... i want finally a solution!
    so i think, this is more understandable, at least it's written in a better english then in my first post...
    lastly, here's a screenshot:
    http://www.abload.de/img/picture274xc.png

  • Mac Pro CPU temperature while rendering

    Hey there, I just recently got myself a Mac Pro 2009 with a stock CPU - quad 2.66. While rendering, my CPU temperature goes up to 71C/160F and fans are on their defaults. Im just wondering if this temperature is OK for fans to not kick in, or I should reset something? Thank you

    By seeing all the thermal sensor readings, and fans, sometimes people have found an issue where the readings were not right - sensor was getting wrong reading or none -
    Laptop like MacBook Pro can often have their fans running much harder to cool and deal with heat.
    Those new Haswell chips are suppose to run even hotten, they may be providing Intel 4600 integrated graphics as well as cpu functions, PCIe and USB3 as well as memory controller. They are powerful and efficient - and you will see cpu spikes in utilization AND corresponding changes in temps. \
    Same on Mac Pro but not as extreme. Opening apps and files can show 10*C jumps for 1/2 second.
    If you are going to render, then sure do what helps the system stay cooler and in a safe(r) temperature range. Newer components are helping companies save $$   on cooling and being able to run servers and even disk drives by 5*C warmer making a huge change. Think Google, Facebook or NSA having large factory flooors housing equipment needing to be kept in temperature controlled environments.

  • K8TM-ILSR CPU temperature "not present"

    I've received a replacement K8TM-ILSR after problems with RAM.
    That's now fixed, but now in the Health Monitoring part of the BIOS, the CPU temperature reading is weird:
    - at boot up the temperature starts in the 80 degrees C (that can't be right!)
    - then it starts dropping, and after a minute or two reaches 20 degrees C and is still falling
    - when it reaches 16 degrees C the reading disappears and is replaced by "not present"
    So as the machine warms up, the CPU temperature actually drops. After a few hours of being switched on, returning to the BIOS still reveals CPU temperature "not present". Only if I reboot from cold do I get a reading, but the reading is always decreasing until it changes to "not present".
    BIOS v1.4 was supposed to correct a problem with temperature reading - my motherboard has BIOS v1.5... so that can't be the problem, can it?
    I'm wondering whether to send the motherboard back for a replacement while I still can.

    Ah, one more thing: the temperature sensor is on the motherboard, and not in the CPU, correct? So if there is a problem it's with the motherboard not the CPU?

  • Macbook Pro Retina  Late 2013 CPU temperature issues while gaming (99 celsius) Is this normal ?

    Hello everyone, this is my first time here. I recently purchased a macbook pro retina late 2013 notebook just over a month ago. It seems to be working just fine. I've installed bootcamp and installed windows 7. I use Speccy for my temperature monitor. I've played DayZ Standalone as well as L4D2. I noticed while playing both games on their lowest settings the CPU temperature consistently stays in the 90 degree celsius range often reaching 99 degrees celsius. I am fairly tech saavy and have a decent knowledge of computers.I bought the ThermaPak Heatshift pad in hopes of cooling it down but to no avail as it only does a great job at cooling everything else. This is my first laptop so I treat it like my baby ! haha I was wondering if these temp readings are normal because I know that even reaching 70 celsius can be somewhat damaging. Thank you for your assistance.
    EDIT:
    I've attached a screenshot of the temperature for proof

    So I just got back from the apple store and wow, what rude service. The guy basically shrugged when I told him "Well, I guess Im stuck with it huh?" after he told me there was no way I could get a refund. He performed a test and told me everything was fine and told me in a very arrogant manner that the test isn't showing the results I told them about as if I was lying....***? He said they can send it away for a few weeks but I don't have any other computer and I just bought this one for school so I can't afford to have it gone for that long. He told me "doesn't your school have a computer lab"? Seriously, how can someone at Apple be this rude? I told him they do but its closed at 7 and I dont live on campus. How could a computer lab replace a personal computer? He basically kept shrugging rudely anytime I tried to find a solution. He didn't even reply with a single word. When I told him I called the call center and they told me that yes it is much too hot and to take it to the store after doing a fix he just chuckled and rolled his eyes. Really?  I spent 1500 dollars on this computer to not even be able to do basic things on it without it overheating and the service is this bad? Well, looks like I won't ever be buying an apple product again even though before this experience I was a huge fan of all their products. I know one customer doesnt make a difference to them but come on...looks like I'm stuck with it and apple couldnt give one care. If having your hands uncomfortably hot after a small amount of time is acceptable then it looks like I'll never be buying another laptop from them. Its a shame I really liked it at first.

  • Portege M400 - High CPU temperature

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem with CPU temperature in my M400 (Vista OS). When I power up computer, initial temperature is around 35C, but after about 15 minutes of work it jumps to 60C and stays there.
    Last night reached 80C and that really concerned me. I tried anything from upgrading BIOS (v3.6) to changing power options in Vista.
    I don't know if this is actually funny, but a few days ago I placed a pack of chocolate next to cooler (about 10 centimeters away) and after 5 minutes I noticed it started to melt. :(
    Please help! Any suggestion is welcome!
    Regards,
    Jovan

    Hi Jayjay,
    I haven't experienced any unusual shut downs so far. The only problem was keyboard buttons overheating. After using computer in tablet mode keyboard would become pretty hot.
    However, as you suggested, I used vacuum cleaner on my computer and the situation is quite better now. Idle temperature is 44C-47C, while during high performance it goes up to 70C. The good part is that when I leave the computer idle for few minutes it automatically drops down to default 44C-47C (not like before).
    Now, I can't be absolutely sure how I managed to do this, but it definitely has something to do with Toshiba Power Saver, which is only like "add-on" to Vista's power management. There is an option that sets CPU to Cooling optimized mode. The down side of this story is that my cooler is really noisy now but I don't care much! :)
    Thank you for your help!
    Regards!

  • K8T Neo-FSR showing incorrect CPU temperature

    Hello. I recently purchased a K8T Neo-FSR, which came with BIOS v2.2 installed. For some reason, it wouldn't allow me to set my own memory timings (it always used the "safe and sane" SPD values, according to CPU-Z, regardless of any BIOS settings I tried). I wasn't about to sit back and let my expensive new memory go underclocked, so following some advice I found on an obscure German forum, I installed the v7.1 BIOS from MSI's global site. That fixed the timing issue, but now the board is reporting incorrect temperatures for my CPU. It usually fluctuates between 23-26c, but will occasionally rise to nearly 30c and then immediately drop back down again. Case temperature remains stable at 27c. When I first installed the board, the temps were right around 45c, almost 20 degrees higher, which seems a lot more accurate to me (though this was also before I upgraded the crappy heatsink).
    Is this anything to be concerned about, and is the CPU temperature supposed to constantly fluctuate like that? I'm worried that if my fan fails or something else goes wrong, the sytem won't react until the temperature is 20 degrees OVER the safe limit. I have a feeling it interferes with the Cool n' Quiet functions, too, though my CPU fan (Thermaltake Venus 7) has its own built-in sensor and adjusts itself automatically anyway.
    Aside from the temperature wackiness, the system is rock-solid and runs like a dream. Specs are in my signature.

    There are 754 Venice's out there as NewEgg sold them at one point from what I gather as I was looking at what was the best 754 but settled for the Clawhammer.
    I have just stopped using CoreCentre on my XP as it started to show extremely erroneous and frightening temps so I ran MBM5 in conjunction as well as used my Cases thermal probes and guess which one was wrong...?
    This was after seating and reseating the cooler, CPU, memory many times and it was only on Asetek's forums that reminded me that I should maybe do some independant tests by taping probes on the cpu's board as close to the core as poss, a difference of twenty degrees no less.
    CoreCentre seems to have got a bit lost and a tad annoyed as I cross checked after buying the components for a 1/2" inch custom watercooling setup.
    Now this is the current temp and voltages I get:
    The 45 degree high was me using Prime to "cook" the thermal paste as I had to reseat the Artic Freezer 64 as it had dropped a touch.
    My ClawHammer is for some reason one of those that never had a heatspreader which of course leads to difficulties with such coolers as the Freezer 64 Pro.   Does anyone know where I can get another spreader or should I just leave it...?
    I am not going to o/c this CPU to be honest, since sorting the temps out and once the watercooling is on, 3.2Ghz is plenty good for me for the moment and bearing in mind the Neo's touchyness about settings in BIOS I am very much considering now to roll back the BIOS to 1.9 as it was 2.2 that started causing the problems.
    As for the memory timings, my Neo is totally ignoring any attempts to change the timings of my memory, I had to part company with my XMS Crucial sticks because the Neo had all sorts of problems and running some of the best memory at DDR200 was pointless.
    AO

  • Weird CPU temperature problem

    Hi everyone.
    The first time I run my system in the morning,  I'm having high CPU temp readings by Core Center: 71 C, at around 40% CPU usage, running Norton Antivirus '05, and 67 at iddle. In the same conditions, Motherboard Monitor 5 reads: 67 C for N. Antivirus and 63 C at iddle.
    So, I restart computer and check BIOS's PCHealth Status. It reads 46 C for CPU temp.
    Then I get back to Windows XP (SP2), Core Center reads CPU temp while running N. Antivirus as 53 C, and MBM reads 50 C at 40%-80% CPU usage. At iddle, Core Center reads 49 C, and MBM5 reads 45 C.
    Environment temp is about 30 C.
    What do you guys think is happening? Do I need to worry about it or not?
    Thanks in advance for your input.
    My System:
    Windows XP PRO (SP2)
    MSI K8N Neo 2 Platinum BIOS 1.30
    Athlon64 3800+ no OC
    Leadtek A400 6800GT 256 MB
    Crucial Ballistix PC4000 2x 512 MB slots 3 and 4
    Zalman 7000B AlCu
    Vantec Stealth 470A
    Raptor 74GB SATA
    Barracuda 7200.7 160 GB SATA
    SoundBlaster Audigy2 ZS Platinum
    NEC 3500 DVD-RW
    Samsung SB616 DVD-ROM
    SpeedTouch 330 ADSL modem.

    I was having the same problem as described by the forum user.  Despite my laziness, I even unhooked my CPU fan clean the fan and the CPU and put it back together with Arctic silver.  This helped the idle temperature at START up from 50 degree C down to 43 degree C reading from Core Center.  However, eventually the CPU temp will creep back up to 47 to 50 degrees C.
    My breakthrough came when I read one of the thread which said to uninstalled Core Center, once I done that, my CPU temperature at Cold Start and Warm Start seemed to be consistent at around 36 to 40 degree C (I used SpeedFan 4.18 to verify my temp readings I even crossed check the temp reading with SisSandra 2005 and the two readings are consistent).  
    I then installed CoreCEnter 1.7.1.0 back and during cold start the temperature will creep back up and keep on increasing.  Once I do a warm start everything is back to normal again.  So after cold start I open both SpeedFan and CoreCenter side by side and I notice the following:
    During cold start, CoreCenter never starts the CPU fan at max RPM, it starts around 2200 RPM or so.   Then it would start loading the CPU varying from 1 to 4 to 100% (this happens intermittently so you won't see it if you are not staring at the screen), which would increase the CPU temperature (this is observed in the SpeedFan monitoring screen).    Then it would lower the CPU fan back to 1850 RPM or so and does not increase the fan speed even when temperature goes back up.  The problem does not seem to exist when one does a warm start then CoreCenter lets the fan stays at maximum speed and the temperature is stable.
    I noticed when I downloaded the new CoreCenter version 1.7.1.0 software from the MSI web site, it said "fixing fan speed never reach maximum problem", so I believe this is a CoreCenter software bug.  BTW, I just went back to the MSI tech support web site; it no longer showed this message.  I have a feeling that they removed the message from potential liability with high temperature issue that might have led to many MB returns.  (I know this is sounding awfully like a conspiracy theory)  
    This is my conclusion:
    (1) CPU temp reading from core center is accurate minus about 3 to 4 degree C cross checked again other utilities.  (If you system reaches 60 to 70, I should still be alarmed, do not just let the system idle, because it could be an actual reading minus 3 to 4 degrees).
    (2) CoreCenter never let the fan reaches maximum speed during cold start and will load the system gradually therefore increase CPU temperature even more.
    (3) After warm start, Core Center goes to normal and let the CPU fan goes back to maximum speed.
    I know this is not a very scientific observation, nevertheless it is reproducible on my system.  Please note that I have a Neo Pla set up not Neo Pla 2 therefore results might be different if you have a Neo Pla2 set up.  I really doubt that would be the case since CoreCenter only has one version for both motherboards.
    Please give this a try and see what you find, I am curiously to see what other gets.  If we can all produce the same issue, perhaps MSI will come out with an updated version of CoreCenter again.

  • MSI Neo2 users, cpu temperature!!!, please post yours!!!

    Hi Guys
    for the MSI Neo2 865PE users,i want to know, what is your guys cpu temperature while your computer is idle and stressed/underload.
    my rig:
    MSI Neo2-S (bios ver.1.0) P4 2.4C @stock speed with stock heatsink fan
    ATI Radeon 9500 Pro (not oc'ed)
    80 GB WD and 60 GB Seagate HDD
    Antec 1080 AMG with 430Watt psu
    4 fan running = 2 intake 2 blow out
    Sound Blaster Audigy
    1x512 MB Ram Kingston
    and,
    i'm using pcalert4, and it shows:
    CPU idle=45 Celcius
    CPU when playing games=60 Celcius
    System Temperature = 29-32 Celcius
    please post yours, please... because, i think it is too hot for p4 to have that kind of temperature.
    thank guys!!!

    Quote
    I am wondering how accurate the sensors are on these boards.
    I don't think MSI (nor any other manufacturer) has a step to calibrate the temperature sensors, so the answer is - not much  
    They are just relative temp readings, and probably vary from board to board.
    Quote
    system temp. Board readings are from 39c to 43c but the air temp coming out the back 120mm fan is 31c to 33c.
    Air cooling is achieved by transferring heat from hotter components to the cooler air. This will raise the temperature of the exhaust, but never higher than your hottest component. It actually depends where the sensor is located. If you put a card on the PCI slot above the Winbond chip, you would probably observe higher SYS temperatures.

Maybe you are looking for