Annual Leaves calculating wrongly

Hi All,
I applied Annual leaves in IT2001 for 10 days. After running my time evaluation it is deducting only 4 days, It should deduct 10 days from year entitlement.
How & where can i check ?
Thanks,
Kumar.

Hi,
The Min 0 and Max is 999 days.
No entry in table T556C.
It is used Calendar days, No records in IT2003.
User applied leave From    14.06.2010 - 21.06.2010
Absence hours           47.50
Absence days             7.00
Calendar days            7.00
Amount of leave          7.00 Days
But in infotype0005 showing only 4 days, it should show 7.

Similar Messages

Ordinary leave calculating wrongly

Dear Guru's
In our client we have got Oridnary leave known as OL normally it will be given only for 5 days. If an employees takes leave from 30/03/2009 to 03/04/2009. Instead of deducting 5 days its deducting 10 days based on this Its affecting allowances like attendance, factory, washing allowances also. How to rectify this?
Thanks and Regards
Suresh.V

Hi
Thanks for your reply. Actually whoever is taking leave at the end of the month say like 30.03.2009 to 03.04.2009, the leave is deducting correctly but the attendance based on relevant allowances like factory and washing allowances are deducting for 10 days. I would like to know the solution for this and i am not that confident with TM so kindly help me out step by step in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
Suresh.V

Generation of Annual Leave Quota at a time for the whole year

Hi All,
Kindly give some suggestions.
I am working on Time evaluation. We have a quota , Annual leave which is now given on monthly basis, means lets 12 annual leave are for whole year and employee are getting 1 leave on each month.
Now my requirement is to give this quota at a time in the start of every year. That means all the 12 annual leave should be generated in the start of a year.
When I select the option no pro rata calculation then I am getting all this leave in the start of the year. But when an employee is joined in the mid of the year then also 12 leave is been generated which is not correct.
Please suggest me how to make this leave as prorated so that for new joinee , this leave is generated taking into account the period and generate the prorate value for the whole year at the time of joining.
Thanks
Tanuja.

Hi Sikinder,
I am using + time evaluation Status-2. We have to generate quota in PT60 for each period.
Write now we are getting annual leave quota getting generated in monthly basis. We want to genarate whole quota for the year in the 1st month of the year.
When I have given calender year in the accrual period , i am not getting any quota in the 1st month rather getting the whole quota in the end of the year.
Please suggest me what to do.
Regards,
Tanuja.

How to calculate annual leave - please advise

Hi,
I need your advise please..
here is the detail:::
The employee contract can be definite (with expiry date) or indefinite (open without expiry date).
The employee contract will always have date of join
if the contract is definite then employee will have 30 days every year where the year is the period between the date of join and
+365 days and the renewal is the same (from the renewal date and +365)
if the contract is indefinite then employee will have 30 days every year where the year is the period between the date of join
it's every 365 days so the contract has not renewal but the employee will have 30 days annually.
for example, if indefinite and date of join is 1 April 2010 then every period from 1 April until 30 March will have 30 days for
the employee
I want to calculate the leaves for the employee without having to keep a renew table so it will be calculated based on the leave
date and the first date of join.
so the data will be just one leave table with from and to indicating the leave period for every leave and the result will be
1 April - 31 March - [Total Taken Leaves] - [Total Remaining Leaves]
hope
I explained it well...

I think I understand what you're saying. Try out the code below to see if it works for you.
I know you mentioned possibly have a table with leave_from and leave_to as the structure for how you would keep track of each employee's leave days, but I would simplify it to just EmployeeID and the LeaveDate, which is what I did below.
If you choose to go with a range, then you need to start dealing with only business days in your leave range calculations.
-- CREATE SOME DATA
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#Employee', 'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #Employee;
CREATE TABLE #Employee (
EmployeeID int NOT NULL
,FullName varchar(30) NOT NULL
,JoinDate date NOT NULL
,EndDate date NULL
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#EmployeeDaysOnLeave', 'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #EmployeeDaysOnLeave;
CREATE TABLE #EmployeeDaysOnLeave (
EmployeeID int NOT NULL
,LeaveDate date NOT NULL
INSERT #Employee
SELECT A.*
FROM (SELECT * FROM #Employee WHERE 1=2
UNION ALL SELECT 1, 'Joe', '01/01/2014', NULL
UNION ALL SELECT 2, 'Bob', '07/01/2014', '01/01/2015'
UNION ALL SELECT 3, 'Eve', '10/15/2007', NULL
UNION ALL SELECT 4, 'Ila', '09/08/2000', NULL
UNION ALL SELECT 5, 'Oto', '07/01/2014', '01/01/2017'
UNION ALL SELECT 6, 'Pop', '01/01/2013', '06/01/2013' -- Already let go
) A
INSERT #EmployeeDaysOnLeave
SELECT A.*
FROM (SELECT * FROM #EmployeeDaysOnLeave WHERE 1=2
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '01/30/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '01/31/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '02/01/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '02/04/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/15/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/16/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/17/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/18/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/19/2013'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '01/30/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '01/31/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '02/03/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '02/04/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/14/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/15/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/16/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/17/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 1, '04/18/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/21/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/22/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/23/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/24/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/25/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/28/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/29/2014'
UNION ALL SELECT 2, '07/30/2014'
) A
-- NOTE: I'm throwing all these calculations into a quick temp table, but you may want to put this logic into a view or table function
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#EmployeeLeaveCalculations', 'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #EmployeeLeaveCalculations;
DECLARE @DaysPerYear int
,@CurrentDate date
SELECT @DaysPerYear = 30
,@CurrentDate = CONVERT(date, GETDATE())
SELECT A.EmployeeID
,A.FullName
,A.JoinDate
,A.EndDate
,A.LeaveCalculationStartDate
,A.LeaveCalculationEndDate
,CASE WHEN A.LeaveCalculationEndDate < A.LeaveCalculationStartDate -- Ignore if they are no longer with the company
THEN 0
ELSE CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, A.LeaveCalculationEndDate) < 365
THEN @DaysPerYear * DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, A.LeaveCalculationEndDate) / 365.0
ELSE @DaysPerYear * 1.0
END
END as LeaveDaysEntitledTo
,CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, A.LeaveCalculationEndDate) = 0 OR -- Avoid divide by zero
A.LeaveCalculationEndDate < A.LeaveCalculationStartDate -- Ignore if they are no longer with the company
THEN 0
ELSE ROUND(DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, @CurrentDate) * 1.0 /
DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, A.LeaveCalculationEndDate)* 1.0 *
CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, A.LeaveCalculationEndDate) < 365
THEN @DaysPerYear * DATEDIFF(DAY, A.LeaveCalculationStartDate, A.LeaveCalculationEndDate) / 365.0
ELSE @DaysPerYear * 1.0
END
, 1)
END as CurrentLeaveDaysAccrued
INTO #EmployeeLeaveCalculations
FROM (
SELECT EmployeeID
,FullName
,JoinDate
,ISNULL(EndDate, '12/12/9999') as EndDate
-- If the Month/Date of their JoinDate is less than the current Month/Date,
-- then we reset the leave start date to this year
-- else it will be the previous year
,CASE WHEN CONVERT(int, RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), JoinDate, 112),4)) <= CONVERT(int, RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), @CurrentDate, 112),4))
THEN CONVERT(date, CONVERT(char(4), YEAR(@CurrentDate)) + RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), JoinDate, 112),4))
ELSE CONVERT(date, CONVERT(char(4), YEAR(@CurrentDate)-1) + RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), JoinDate, 112),4))
END as LeaveCalculationStartDate
,CASE WHEN EndDate IS NOT NULL AND EndDate < DATEADD(YEAR,1,JoinDate)
THEN EndDate
WHEN CONVERT(int, RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), JoinDate, 112),4)) <= CONVERT(int, RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), @CurrentDate, 112),4))
THEN CONVERT(date, CONVERT(char(4), YEAR(@CurrentDate)+1) + RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), JoinDate, 112),4))
ELSE CONVERT(date, CONVERT(char(4), YEAR(@CurrentDate)) + RIGHT(CONVERT(char(8), JoinDate, 112),4))
END as LeaveCalculationEndDate
FROM #Employee
) A
SELECT X.*
,Y.TotalLeaveDaysTaken
,X.CurrentLeaveDaysAccrued - Y.TotalLeaveDaysTaken as CurrentLeaveDaysBalance
,X.LeaveDaysEntitledTo - Y.TotalLeaveDaysTaken as TotalRemainingLeaveDays
FROM #EmployeeLeaveCalculations X
JOIN (
-- Get the total leave days taken from the given Employee's leave calculation start date
SELECT A.EmployeeID
,SUM(CASE WHEN B.EmployeeID IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as TotalLeaveDaysTaken
FROM #EmployeeLeaveCalculations A
LEFT JOIN #EmployeeDaysOnLeave B
ON A.EmployeeID = B.EmployeeID
AND A.LeaveCalculationStartDate <= B.LeaveDate
GROUP BY A.EmployeeID
) Y
ON X.EmployeeID = Y.EmployeeID

Maintain Company Annual Leave and Statutory Annual Leave based on seniority

Hi experts,
I am trying to configure an additional absence quota for the employees to generate leave quota. In current system, there is only Company Annual Leave quota but with a new requirement, should have another quota type calls Statutory Annual Leave for employees
Company Annual Leave quota based on the day when employee joined the current company, this is maintained in IT0041 date type 01 Year of Service.
NEW Statutory Annual Leave quota is based on the 1st day of his 1st job in life ( this may not be in the current company )
For an example, John has been working for 13 years for his working life and currently he has worked in Star company for 1 year and he entitles for 16 days Company Annual Leave.
The Statutory Annual Leave entitlement is based on the criteria below
1) 5 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works from 1-9 years
2) 10 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works from 10-19 years
3) 15 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works above 20 years
The total Annual Leave ( Statutory AL + Company AL ) should be same as total of initial total company annual leave
For John, he should entitle as below ;
1) Statutory Annual Leave 10 days ( he worked for 13 years in life )
2) Company Annual Leave ( the difference between total company AL(10)u2013 Statutory AL(16) = 6 ) 6 days
The roadblock Iu2019m facing now is where can I control the Statutory Data Type seniority in order to generate the new absence quota type.
In the feature HDATE it is being set to 01 which all the leave related calculation is based on date type 01, but the statutory date type is 07 so how can I caters on date type 07?
Please help, thank you and have a nice day.

Since you able to set the seniority for company annual leave.
same matter you can set the seniority for statutory annual leave.
If the annual leave is fix to 16 days
seniority for statutory annual leave
1) 5 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works from 1-9 years
2) 10 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works from 10-19 years
3) 15 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works above 20 years
Seniorty for company annual leave
1) 16-5=9 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works from 1-9 years
2) 16-10=6 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works from 10-19 years
3) 16-15=1 days Statutory Annual Leave for those works above 20 years

GR/IR clearing account calculating wrong price

HI
I am facing the problem with GR/IR clearing a/c, when the user is creating MIGO transation with ref Scheduled agreement PO, its calculating wrong price.
My scenario is :-
Scheduled agreement PO has been created in USD currency (Qua 370*356.07)
While I am doing the MIGO itu2019s not calculating correctly.
I can give some more information below
Company code currency is RUB but transaction currency is USD
PO is creating in USD
Material ledger is activated for this material
Currency exchange rates are updated in daily basis
When I am doing the MIGO the document was created like below
1709250    Duties accrual                     603.152,52- RUB             19.761,89- USD
1100100    Comm.Inv.fin.pr.                 4.624.163,80 RUB            151.507,60 USD
1614000    Transit match.acc.                 422.859,09- RUB             13.870,37- USD
7774100    Pr.diff.oth.goods.               3.598.152,19- RUB            117.875,34- USD
Actually posting is (370356.07=131745.9)
*But here it is showing 13.870.37
I am very thanking full for your Inputs.
Thanks
Ramakrishna
Edited by: DRS12345 on Oct 27, 2010 11:31 AM

Hi,
What has already been posted in SAP has been posted. One alternative in front of you is to create adjustment postings in PCA to post to the correct Profit Center. You can use transaction code 1KEL or 9KE0 for the same but it may not work as most probably you will the GR/IR clearing account set to "Post automatically" in the GL Master. In such a scenario the only option would be to have customized program to create IDOCs with Message Type "PRCMAS" to post the adjustment postings in your system.
regards

Absence Deduction is calculated wrong for one employee

Hi, We have an employee who changed his absence booking for the year and all of sudden his absence deduction is not calculating properly. His total absence quota was 20 days. He initially booked all 20 days and then cancelled them and created a new booking for 9.5 days but his deduction is saying 16.5 days.
Is there a way I can check his records why it's only happening to him. Also I am new to this so not sure where to start investigating. I did check the deduction rule and it's ok - calculates correctly for other employees, only this particular employee is calculating wrong.

Hi Joe,
I did replicate it for another employee belonging to the same group and it calculated correctly. And the 9.5 days already excludes holidays and weekends. Not sure what else to check at this point. Although the only difference in the records of the 2employees is that the problematic employee has a negative carryover from previous year. not sure exactly what that means.

Scheduling Agreement JIT / Forecast calculating wrong

Hello experts,
I´m with a problem with JIT / Forecast.
The forecast are calculating wrong values. For example:
Cumulative quantity calculated: 584
JIT schedule:
DATE             TIME         Order Quantity       Cml. released quantity        Open Quantity
06.01.2012     00:00     32          32
10.01.2012     00:00     352          384
13.01.2012     00:00     128          512
17.01.2012     00:00     88          600              16
Forecast schedule
DATE             TIME         Order Quantity       Cml. released quantity        Open Quantity
20.01.2012     00:00     112          112
24.01.2012     00:00     224          336
27.01.2012     00:00     128          464
31.01.2012     00:00     200          664
The values of forecast are calculating by Cumulative quantity calculated that is 584 and I dont have any Open Quantity and in this case I need to have Open Quantity in Forecast.
The forecast must not be calculated by the amount in transit
Help me.
Tks
LFC

Hi ashish
Check the planning delivery schedule tab and go to item data -> delivery schedule header and check wheather any proper information has been filled or not
Regards
Srinath

How to view CEO annual leave on self selvice

I have a requirement for the CEO HR personnel to be able to view his annual leave details on self service.
But as he is not her surbordinate, he doesnt appear in the list of 'My Employee'
information she can view. Can someone please advise the best way to meet this requirement?
How can we allow the HR personnel to view his entitlement etc details on self
service.

Hi
What is the need to see Annual leave only through self service. I think HR should use professional screen.
Just change the security profile of responsibility and check if this works. Not sure though.
Thanks
Avinash

Error In Posting to accounts - PF calculated wrong

Hi,
I am getting error in Posting to accounts- error - Posting balance is not cleared (Period -
Following Wage types are calculated wrong -
Expense
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 =6,500.000
Balance sheet
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000-
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 = 325,000.000-
MF80 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 =6,500.000-
/3P2 Professional Tax Basis = 8,387.096-
Symbolic accounts assigned are as standard - no changes made
Please help me solve this.
Thanks in advance.
Monica

Hi Monica,
We have solved this issue in our company.
For this you have to create another wage types & make a "PCR" as it divide the 100000 amount from the technical wage types, & then instead of posting the technical wage types post the new wage types u have created.
Don't worry about statutory reports as in there SAP is using some factor which will give the correct value.
Regards,
Gaurav

Planned overhead is calculating wrongly in CK11N run, it is just more than double

Hi Gurus
1) While running CK11N overhead cost is calculating wrongly on base (material price). In my case I have maintained 1% Overhead on raw material for Duty in cost sheet. In my case no routing, and my FG is getting produced by process order. My Raw material cost is showing Rs. 2,364.45 but my Duty is showing Rs. 48.73, When I run CK11N for Finished goods.
When I Check the costing structure it is showing all the material for costing, if i drill down there it is calculating correctly for Raw materials. Say heavy furnace oil material cost is Rs. 36,140.16 /M.T and overhead is Rs. 361.40 and for all raw material it is calculating correct 1%. But for my finished goods it is just more than 2%.
As per my understanding over head is calculating for RM once @ 1% and later material cost + overhead cost getting calculated by 1% again.
Please see the attachment. I have furnished a statement for this also.
2) Also Please tell me the T-Code for costing run as actual cost. and how can I show a comparison report on planned and actual report for a product costing.
3) My scenario is this is a power generation Co. Not possible to maintain activity cost. What they want to do is. on the last day of a month they will take the trial balance for the plant/ business area and will set the percentage in cost sheet (Actual for current month / planned for next month) for admin, manpower and other costs based on raw material GL values.
So I have created a cost sheet where I have maintained base and assigned those RM GL/ Cost elements and other costs I have maintained in cost sheet based on row No. 10 (base) and assigned secondary cost elements and percentages assigned as per overhead type and plant, in cost component structure I have maintained same cost elements as set earlier in cost sheet.
Please find the file attached
Please suggest me if I M wrong.
Thanks & Regards
Subrata

Hi.
In itemization of CK11N over head is showing correct. But the material cost for RM is already after charging overhead. I have checked the itemization of Process order there for the first material was Rs. 144.56, but in the itemization view of CK11N it is showing Rs.148.90/- That means exactly after adding 3% overhead which I maintained in cost sheet.
Itemization of Ck11N
Itemization of COR2
Please Help
Thanks & Regards
Subrata

Error while generating the annual leave quota.

Hi All,
For all the employee group's for the past 2 years we are generating the Annual leave quota.
For one employee group, management decided not to give annual leave quota. i have done the necessary configuration so that the quota will not get generated for them.
For the new employees quota is not getting generated.
For the old employees i have deleted the annual leave absence quota and run PT60. For these employees system is throwing the following error.
    Error entry no. 83 Error when creating absence quota
     General information
     Rule: 000 quota type 00
    No quota type for key 7 99 01 20110930
Please suggest the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Sumathi.

Hi ERP12345,
This is for employee Group,
We have 2 employee groups, 1. Permanent
                                                2. Contract
For all the contract employees, we have generated the annual leave quota for the past 2 years.
Now management doesn't want any annual leave quota to be generated for this particulat employee group. so i have deleted all the configuration related to this employee group from base entitlement, accrual of quota generation, deduction rule,selection rule & couting rule.
When i am hiring a new empoyee the quota is generating correctly, means annual leave quota is not generating, remaining leaves are generating.
Is it a right way of doing, normally if this is the scenario, what we have do to,
For the old employees, after deleting the 2006 IT also, system if thwoing the error as i mentioned in my first conversation.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
Sumathi.

Delivery date getting calculated wrongly in delivery created via VL10D

Hi Gurus,
We have a strange issue, where in delivery date is getting calculated wrongly for replenishment delivery created via VL10D.
When we are creating via VL10D , delivery date is getting the additional 30 days from MaxDlvCrteDate . With initial investigation i see that VL10D has delivery creation profile 0101 for which no of days maintained in max delv creation date is 30 .
I assume that the delivery date is getting the additional days from delivery creation profile felid no of max delv creation date .
I have created the delivery on 24.03.2011, as per the route no of TL time is 9 days , So Ideally the delivery date should be 04.04.2011 , however system has calculated it as 23.04.2011
Delivery no No of days in MaxDlvCrteDate Delivery date
213443158 30 23.04.2011
If I create the delivery for the same PO using t-code VL10B, then delivery date is calculating correctly.
Not sure why system behavior is strange.
Please help me with your inputs to resolve the issue..
Thanks in advance

Please request one Abaper to solve this problem.
You cannot due nothing as the problem is in Code.
Regards
William

Report on Annual leave details

Dear All,
Would you please give a hint on the REPORT of giving all the annual leave details of the employees.
Also, please advise the report name on leave balance.
Thanks and best regards,
Sophie Que

HI,
You can run the SAP Standard Progran RPTQTA10 in transaction SE28 or SA38.
Regards,
Kapil Kaushal

Subsequent debit tax calculating wrong

dear guru
while doing subsequent debit for the vendor the Excise duty is calculating wrong
my issue is like this
i have purchase 100 quty with value 10/kg total amount is 1000 for that
ED is calculated 140
Ecess calculated 3
S&H calculated 1
i have done goods receipt and posted invoice also
now i that part of the quantit i have returne
lets 50 kg i have retune for that MIRO,MIGO,JIS,J1iV i have done
next vendor will send the suplimentry invocie because the rate is increase for that 50 quantiy, for that i will do J1IH for the additional excise and i will do MIRO subsequent debit for the rate increse in miro the tax amount is calculating wrong, ie
lets for 50 quantity total amoun increased 100
ed should calculate 14 but it is calculating 28
for that i have to apply any note
pl tell me urgent
thanks
regards
jrp

My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

Annual Leaves calculating wrongly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for