GR/IR clearing account calculating wrong price

HI
I am facing the problem with GR/IR clearing a/c, when the user is creating MIGO transation with ref Scheduled agreement PO, its calculating wrong price.
My scenario is :-
Scheduled agreement PO has been created in USD currency (Qua 370*356.07)
While I am doing the MIGO itu2019s not calculating correctly.
I can give some more information below
Company code currency is RUB but transaction currency is USD
PO is creating in USD
Material ledger is activated for this material
Currency exchange rates are updated in daily basis
When I am doing the MIGO the document was created like below
1709250    Duties accrual                     603.152,52- RUB             19.761,89- USD
1100100    Comm.Inv.fin.pr.                 4.624.163,80 RUB            151.507,60 USD
1614000    Transit match.acc.                 422.859,09- RUB             13.870,37- USD
7774100    Pr.diff.oth.goods.               3.598.152,19- RUB            117.875,34- USD
Actually posting is (370356.07=131745.9)
*But here it is showing 13.870.37
I am very thanking full for your Inputs.
Thanks
Ramakrishna
Edited by: DRS12345 on Oct 27, 2010 11:31 AM

Hi,
What has already been posted in SAP has been posted. One alternative in front of you is to create adjustment postings in PCA to post to the correct Profit Center. You can use transaction code 1KEL or 9KE0 for the same but it may not work as most probably you will the GR/IR clearing account set to "Post automatically" in the GL Master. In such a scenario the only option would be to have customized program to create IDOCs with Message Type "PRCMAS" to post the adjustment postings in your system.
regards

Similar Messages

GR/IR clearing account showing wrong values (F.19)

Hello,
At my company, they run the MR11 to check for GR/IR variances and then clear these variances using the F.13 transaction. However, when the F.19 transaction is run to analyze the GR/IR clearing account, there are some old PO's belonging to year 2005/2006 that still show up in the report. When these PO's are checked, there is no GR/IR variance.
Could someone please explain the reason for this and if there is any way to remove these entries from the F.19 report?
Thanks in advance,
Rugmani.

Yes, you can do F.19 in month 6.
The posting will happen on the posting date provided in the "Postings" tab of F.19 (Provided that period is open in OB52.)
Regards,
Gaurav

Error In Posting to accounts - PF calculated wrong

Hi,
I am getting error in Posting to accounts- error - Posting balance is not cleared (Period -
Following Wage types are calculated wrong -
Expense
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 =6,500.000
Balance sheet
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000-
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 = 325,000.000-
MF80 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 =6,500.000-
/3P2 Professional Tax Basis = 8,387.096-
Symbolic accounts assigned are as standard - no changes made
Please help me solve this.
Thanks in advance.
Monica

Hi Monica,
We have solved this issue in our company.
For this you have to create another wage types & make a "PCR" as it divide the 100000 amount from the technical wage types, & then instead of posting the technical wage types post the new wage types u have created.
Don't worry about statutory reports as in there SAP is using some factor which will give the correct value.
Regards,
Gaurav

GR IR Clearing account posting to wrong profit center

Dear All,
Here I am encountering the live problem that ,
After the some customization changes , there was an impact on GR/IR Clearing account with regards to the profit center posting
When we receive (GR) , the FI document line item is posting to the different profit Center, then the PO profit center.
Stock Account is capturing PO and meterial profit Center, when G R is posted ,
GR/IR Clearing account is capturing the different profit Center(wrong profit center)
Please advise me is there is any way to correct, the wrongly posted documents,
we are trying to stop the encountering error by modifying the customisation but the problem is how to correct the error postings.
This is urgent issue ,
Please try to help me by providing proper solution as early as possible.
Thanking you
With regards
Krishna Rao

Hi,
What has already been posted in SAP has been posted. One alternative in front of you is to create adjustment postings in PCA to post to the correct Profit Center. You can use transaction code 1KEL or 9KE0 for the same but it may not work as most probably you will the GR/IR clearing account set to "Post automatically" in the GL Master. In such a scenario the only option would be to have customized program to create IDOCs with Message Type "PRCMAS" to post the adjustment postings in your system.
regards

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Clearing GR/IR with Price Variance

Hi Friends,
1) We created a PO with Qty 1 and price $ 67.50.
2) First, GR was made and system calculated $ 67.50 as Moving Average Price.
3) Then Invoice was entered for $ 73.17.
4) For some reasons, GR was reversed. This time system calculated $ 73.17 as value, instead of 67.50.
5) Invoice is now reversed for $ 73.17
6) GR is again made 2nd time with value $ 67.50
7) Invoice is now entered again 2nd time with value $ 73.17
The Net GR value is now $ 61.83( 67.50 - 73.17 + 67.50) AND Net Invoice value is 73.17
When Invoice was posted, it cleared GR/IR for Net GR value of 61.83 and it posted another 11.34 for 'Office supplies GL account.
When we run MR11 to clear GR/IR, it does not clear the above 5.67 dollars ( It should have been 73.17 - 67.50 to get 5.67 dollars ).
My question is, Has system calculated correctly during last Invoice posting and there is no GR/IR balance ?
When we run FBL3N report for GR/IR clearing account, we see a balance of 5.67 and normally we would see 0 here.
Any help is appreciated.
Niranjan

1) We created a PO with Qty 1 and price $ 67.50.
2) First, GR was made and system calculated $ 67.50 as Moving Average Price.
3) Then Invoice was entered for $ 73.17.
4) For some reasons, GR was reversed. This time system calculated $ 73.17 as value, instead of 67.50.
*If you reverse the GR despite of Invoice is posted, it will pick the value of invoice but not the PO value.
In this case GR/IR will be debited 73.17 and stock/expense account will be credit with 73.17 (because in invoice stock/expense debited was 73.17)
So net debit on GR/IR will be 5.67 dollars
5) Invoice is now reversed for $ 73.17
6) GR is again made 2nd time with value $ 67.50
7) Invoice is now entered again 2nd time with value $ 73.17
In this case GR/IR debit will be 67.5 and stock/expense accoutn debit will be 73.17 (67.5 + 5.67directly)
So total debit on GR/IR will be 5.67dollars that you will see on GR/IR clearing GL account balance.
Thanks

GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification

Dear Gurus,
I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$. (GR based IV).   (Valuation - Moving average price)
Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
Regards
Fazal.

Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
Symptom
Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
Example of a purchase order history:
Cat. Doc. no.    Itm    MvT Pstg.dt.            Qty.in BUoM       Value in local curr
GR   5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5 PC         50,00 DEM
GR   5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5 PC         50,00 DEM
Sum of goods receipts                      10 PC        100,00 DEM
DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           3,33 DEM
DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           5.00 DEM
DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           3,33 DEM
DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           5.00 DEM
Total delivery cost GR                                                 16,66 DEM
If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
the following default values for the delivery costs:
Amount    Quantity BUoM Itm Decription              Vendor
6,67         10      PC 10    Freight value        VEND01
10,00        10      PC 10    Freight/quantity     VEND01
(and not, as sometimes expected: - 3,33 DEM    5 PC
                                    - 5,00 DEM    5 PC)
Other terms
WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
Reason and Prerequisites
A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
Solution
This is not an error; this is a consulting note.

Migrating open POs and GR/IR clearing account balance

Hello gurus,
I've got the following problem concerning migration of open POs:
For example: In my source system there is a PO for 10 pcs. of some material. There has been a goods receipt for 5 pcs. (200$ each).
Now, when I import this order and the corresponding purchase order history into my target system (using LSMW), the target system creates the order, a material document for 5 pcs. and an account document.
But of course, our FI-team also has to migrate the balance of the 'old' GR/IR clearing account.
So, the balance in the source system is <> 0 (e.g. 1000$), because the 5 pcs. have been delivered but there has been no invoice receipt yet.
This balance is imported into the new system and then the open orders are migrated, generating an account document and thus, the balance is 2000$ afterwards.
This obviously is not correct, so I am sure that I am missing something, just what?
Thanks
Alicia

Hi,
1. There will be an open PO uploaded for 5 qty and price 200$ each
2. Opening Balance of Material - 5 qty and corresponding value to Stock A/c - 1000$
3. Also there will be Vendor Balances uploaded in the system as 1000$ against the invoice. (If the invoice is still expected then chec with FI Users if they can get invoice form vendor)
if no then do not upload initial stock entry of step2, create a PO of 10 qty and then do GR in system (SAP).

Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Please help me to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance
Deepak

HI
Please pay attention at the possible causes of message AU133:
1. Error AU133:
   a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
structure.
   b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct
   (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
   for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
4.Check if you need revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
-Revaluation acquis. and production costs
-Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

MR11 GR/IR Clearing Account Maintenance

Dear All,
Can anyone help me in understanding GR/IR clearing account maintanence,i do understand in case to nullify any negative balances we go for it, but want to know in details and when we do it for company code what is the impact it does have on accounts.
Thanks and Regards,
Sathya kumar.

Hi Satya,
Please go through the below paragraph , which is Self explanatory for accounting posting while maintaining ( clearing ) the GR /IR balances.
If there is a quantity variance between the goods receipt and the invoice for a purchase order, this results in a balance on the GR/IR clearing account. The system expects an additional goods receipt or an additional invoice to clear this balance. If this is not done, you must clear the GR/IR clearing account manually.
For a material subject to moving average price control, the offsetting entry for clearing the GR/IR clearing account is posted to the stock account (provided that there is sufficient stock coverage for the quantity difference):
If there is a delivery surplus on the GR/IR clearing account, the material was debited with too high a value when the goods receipt was posted. When the GR/IR clearing account is cleared, the material is credited accordingly.
If there is an invoice surplus on the GR/IR clearing account, the material was debited with too low a value when the goods receipt was posted. When the GR/IR clearing account is cleared, the material is debited accordingly
If there is insufficient stock coverage for this quantity, only the portion corresponding to the available stock is posted to the stock account. The rest is posted to a price difference account.
For a material subject to standard price control, the offsetting entry to clear the GR/IR clearing account is made to a price difference account. Thus, there are no value changes in the material master record.
Thanks & Regards
Sridhar

Discount in kind and GR/IR clearing account

Hello gurus,
we use conditions to automatically create items for discount in kind. E.g. when a user adds a new item for material A, a second item is created automatically for material B with price = 0, subitem category = 4 Discount in Kind: Exclusive Bonus Qty.
This works fine. The problem is, that the new item is not automatically marked as a free item and so commitment documents with value = 0 are created. Additionally, there is an item created in the GR/IR clearing account for every discount item (value = 0).
Is there any way to prevent this? I.e. stop SAP from creating the items on the GR/IR clearing account?
Thanks in advance
Alicia

Hello gurus,
ok, problem has been solved. The real problem was that accounting did not post GR for the free items as they should have. If they do, everything works ok. Otherwise MR11 is the only solution.
Thanks anyways
Alicia

Gr/ir clearing account difference

i what cases gr/ir clearing account from migo can be differ from gr/ir clearing account from miro.
suppose at the time of migo gr/ ir clearing account credited with 100 rs then at the time of miro can it be debited with 80 or 120? i
f it can then plz tell me the cases.

Hi
The system makes postings to GR/IR clearing accounts at the time of goods receipt. If, for example, the delivered quantity for a purchase order item is not equal to the invoiced quantity, there is a balance on the GR/IR clearing account.
The person responsible for account maintenance lists the purchase order history with the differences. In order to archive invoice documents, the difference must be cleared. If the balance is not cleared by more goods receipts, return deliveries, invoices, or credit memos, the person responsible for account maintenance has to clear the difference manually.
For GR/IR maintenance refer Tcode-MR11.
MR11 is designed to show the GRs that have not yet been fully invoiced and the invoices that have not yet been fully received.
In any normal business situation there will always be some invoices for items that have not yet been received and some receipts that have not yet been invoiced. But MR11 is designed to be used to clear the OLD ones that are probably NEVER going to be completed.
So you would run MR11 with a date in the past (a few months old normally) and anything that has still got a balance (either way) could indicate that you will never get these cleared no matter how long you wait.
So you can use this transaction to clear these documents.
The best way to use it is to run it firstly with very small tolerances (value and value percentage) and very old dates. For example any PO older than 6 months that has a balance of less than 10 USD. You would prepare the list intially (without update) and see the proposed effect. If you were happy with this you can then run it in update mode and clear those documents. This will post any outstanding values correctly and close down the PO.
For example if you had a PO where you had received 99 and the invoice was for 100, the system would increase the stock value of those 99 by 1 to reflect that we paid 100 for those 99 items (and close the PO)
Similarly if you received 100 and were invoiced for 99 the clearing would reduce the stock value by 1
Both examples are affected by the valuation type (Std price or MAP) but the end result is the same.
After running it like this with small differences, the only uncleared items left would be the recent ones, or the "old" ones that have a bigger difference. You can then run MR11 with larger tolerances, view what would happen and either re run the same selection with update instead of list and clear these.
You would eventually finish up with a manageable number of POs that don't balance and the value difference is quite large. You would then have to decide if you want to leave them as they are and wait for the open amount to be invoiced (or GRd), or you can manually clear them by selecting the individual line and then selecting the clear from the menu options.
At the end of this process you should only have POs that are awaiting further postings.
You would also have to financially clear the entries that have been cleared in MR11 but this would be via the normal financial clearing transactions.
reward if helps,
regards
rb

Purpose & usage of t.code MR11(Maintain GR/IR Clearing account)

Hi All,
Could you pls let me know the Purpose of the T.Cde MR11(Maintain GR/IR Clearing account) and how do we use it.
Is that only to verify and post the valiances between GR & IR.
Rquest for quick help as we have user training tomorrow.
thank you
Chandu

MR11 is used to clear quantity difference between GR and IR.
Some time we may have delivery surplus or Invoice surplus this lead to credit or debit balance in GR/IR account for specific PO.
For e.g. you have PO for 10 quantities at price RS 100 per Unit.
You received GR for 8 Quantity and invoice for 10 quantities.
GR/IR account has Debit balance for Rs 200 because of above business scenario. Suppose after few days or months you realize that vendor is not going to send remaining 2 quantities for which you have already invoiced and paid.
Now you clear GR/IR account through MR11 by updating the stock value if there is enough stock coverage to the value of 200, if there is no enough stock coverage then difference is posted to price difference gain or loss account.

Planned overhead is calculating wrongly in CK11N run, it is just more than double

Hi Gurus
1) While running CK11N overhead cost is calculating wrongly on base (material price). In my case I have maintained 1% Overhead on raw material for Duty in cost sheet. In my case no routing, and my FG is getting produced by process order. My Raw material cost is showing Rs. 2,364.45 but my Duty is showing Rs. 48.73, When I run CK11N for Finished goods.
When I Check the costing structure it is showing all the material for costing, if i drill down there it is calculating correctly for Raw materials. Say heavy furnace oil material cost is Rs. 36,140.16 /M.T and overhead is Rs. 361.40 and for all raw material it is calculating correct 1%. But for my finished goods it is just more than 2%.
As per my understanding over head is calculating for RM once @ 1% and later material cost + overhead cost getting calculated by 1% again.
Please see the attachment. I have furnished a statement for this also.
2) Also Please tell me the T-Code for costing run as actual cost. and how can I show a comparison report on planned and actual report for a product costing.
3) My scenario is this is a power generation Co. Not possible to maintain activity cost. What they want to do is. on the last day of a month they will take the trial balance for the plant/ business area and will set the percentage in cost sheet (Actual for current month / planned for next month) for admin, manpower and other costs based on raw material GL values.
So I have created a cost sheet where I have maintained base and assigned those RM GL/ Cost elements and other costs I have maintained in cost sheet based on row No. 10 (base) and assigned secondary cost elements and percentages assigned as per overhead type and plant, in cost component structure I have maintained same cost elements as set earlier in cost sheet.
Please find the file attached
Please suggest me if I M wrong.
Thanks & Regards
Subrata

Hi.
In itemization of CK11N over head is showing correct. But the material cost for RM is already after charging overhead. I have checked the itemization of Process order there for the first material was Rs. 144.56, but in the itemization view of CK11N it is showing Rs.148.90/- That means exactly after adding 3% overhead which I maintained in cost sheet.
Itemization of Ck11N
Itemization of COR2
Please Help
Thanks & Regards
Subrata

Error in MIRO-GR/IR clearing account getting picked automatically

Dear all,
We are having a problem in doing MIRO once we have moved to ECC 6.0. We are using Non valuated GRN. While doing MIRO system is automatically creating a line item with '0' value. Since we are not using Valuated GRN, we have blocked GR/IR Clearing account for posting. Due to this, it is giving error message. We dont want to open the GL account for posting since there is possibility of wrong postings to this account. If we open the GL account, it is allowing us to post invoice in MIRO. Please confirm what is the solution for this.
Regards
Suresh

Dear Paul,
Thanks for the reply. This is a workaround which we can use temporarily. But i want to address the route cause of the GR/IR clearing account appearing automatically only after ECC 6.0 upgrade. Does anyone know why it is appearing? Please let me know so that i can resolve this.
Regards
Suresh

GR/IR clearing account calculating wrong price

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for