Appraisal period

Hi Gurus,
My client is having 02 appraisal periods dates like "Appraisal validity Period" which is an validity period of appraisal document. And also they are using another period call. " appraisal campaign process period"
i can assign the  validity period but I don't know how to assign the " appraisal campaign process period" in the header area. Are there any way to assign these 2 dates in the header area if the template.
can anyone assist me?
regards
Saritha

There are multiple dates available in OSA.
If you open a template in PHAP_CATALOG, goto tabpage "Layout". There you can see checkboxes:
* Do not display validity period
* Do not display Execution period
You can use execution period maybe?

Similar Messages

  • Appraisal period dates

    Hello,
    Platform:  EBS 11.5.10
    The PER_APPRAISALS table has APPRAISAL_PERIOD_START_DATE and APPRAISAL_PERIOD_END_DATE.  Where do these dates come from?  Our appraisal questions are set up in a Competence template.
    Alwyn

    Hi Alwyn,
    PMP (Performance Management Plan) is the key functionality without which you can't initiate an Appraisal because while configuring the Performance Management Plan, you have to attach the Appraisal Template and to provide Appraisal Period and Appraisal effectivity dates and within these dates only you can initiate an Appraisal. Suppose the Appraisal  Template is valid from 01-Jan-2013 to 31-Dec-2013 and Appraisal dates are 21-Dec-2013 to 31-Dec-2013. You can initiate an Appraisal between 21-Dec-2013 to 31-Dec-2013 only, not earlier or not later. However..the Administrator has the grant usually to modify the Appraisal dates. Coming to PMP.. i think ..no tables are available as the data in PMS can't be captured as of now. I hope you need a licence for PMS Intelligence module where you have this previlege to capture the data.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Making Period Start Date read-only on Appraisal page

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to default Appraisal Period Start Date and Period End Date and make these fields non-editable. I am able to default the values for these fields by extending CO. When I make these fields read-only and performs any operation on page, getting error
    +'You must enter a value for Period Start Date as criteria for the List Of Values.'+
    Please suggest a solution to resolve this error.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: user12037955 on May 12, 2011 9:26 PM

    public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
    super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
    java.util.Date dateValue1 = null;
    java.util.Date dateValue2 = null;
    java.util.Date date = null;
    OAApplicationModule oaapplicationmodule = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
    OAMessageDateFieldBean bean1=(OAMessageDateFieldBean)webBean.findIndexedChildRecursive("StartDate");
    OAMessageDateFieldBean bean2=(OAMessageDateFieldBean)webBean.findIndexedChildRecursive("EndDate");
    String startDate=bean1.getText(pageContext);
    String endDate=bean2.getText(pageContext);
    String strDate1=null;
    String strDate2=null;
    if((startDate==null||startDate.equals(""))&& (endDate==null||endDate.equals("")))
    date=pageContext.getCurrentDBDate();
    SimpleDateFormat simpledateformat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
    String dateValue=simpledateformat.format(date);
    String year=dateValue.substring(0,4);
    try
    String sqlStatement = "";
    CallableStatement cs = null;
    // OAApplicationModule oaapplicationmodule = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
    OADBTransactionImpl txn = (OADBTransactionImpl)oaapplicationmodule.getOADBTransaction();
    cs = txn.createCallableStatement(" ",1);
    sqlStatement = "SELECT to_char(to_date(ffv.attribute1,'RRRR/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),'DD-MON-YYYY') attribute1, " +
    " to_char(to_date(ffv.attribute2,'RRRR/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),'DD-MON-YYYY') attribute2 " +
    " FROM apps.fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs,apps.fnd_flex_values ffv " +
    " WHERE ffv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id " +
    " AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'XXX_PMP_Fiscal_Date_VS' " +
    " AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN NVL(ffv.start_date_active,SYSDATE) AND NVL(ffv.end_date_active,SYSDATE)) " +
    " AND flex_value= " + year +
    " AND ffv.enabled_flag = 'Y' ";
    ResultSet rset = cs.executeQuery(sqlStatement);
    if (rset.next())
    strDate1 = rset.getString(1);
    strDate2= rset.getString(2);
    catch(Exception e)
    throw new OAException("Error:" + e.toString(), OAException.ERROR ) ;
    SimpleDateFormat convertFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy");
    if(strDate1!= null || strDate2!=null)
    try
    dateValue1 = convertFormat.parse(strDate1.toString());
    dateValue2 = convertFormat.parse(strDate2.toString());
    catch(Exception exception)
    bean1.setValue(pageContext,dateValue1);
    bean2.setValue(pageContext,dateValue2);
         bean1.setReadOnly(true);
    bean2.setReadOnly(true);
    }

  • Extending Validity Period In Assigned Appraisal Documents ???

    Dear Experts,
    Appraisal Documents is assigned to Employee via Appcreate, where we have provided some validity period and Execution period of Documents .
    Now requirement is to extend END Date of Validity and execution period .
    For Ex :
    Start date : 01.01.2014
    End Date : 31.06.2014
    Now Appraisal Period is over and appraisal document is freezed .
    Is there any way We can Extend that Appraisal Period from 31.06.2014 to 31.08.2014  ???
    I was trying PHAP_ADMIN_PA, where we can click on CHANGE HEADER DATES and can change Dates and other fields but that is possible before Ending of Appraisal Document .
    Now I am getting Error : latest appraisal date must occur after the current date .
    Is this Possible to do ?
    Is there any table or configuration or enhancements where we can Extend Dates of Freezed Appraisal Documents ?? 
    Its a needful thing to do..
    Please help me out for way forward .
    Regards,
    Pran

    Hi Pran,
    Yes, your request can be done by PHAP_ADMIN_PA (not by PHAP_CHANGE, as was suggested here).
    The reason you got that error message is that you have tried to set the execution end-date earlier than the current date, and that makes no sense.
    As you may know, the execution period determines the period in which the appraisers will be able to enter the appraisal document the perform the appraisal (edit the document). if you set it to a period in the past, what will you gain by doing it?
    Just fix the execution period.
    Regards,
    Liran

  • No valid appraisal document found 00000429

    We have Appraisal & ECM configured. Appraisal documents are also created.
    In MSS when I try to do compensation planning, I get the following error -  'No valid appraisal document found 00000429'.
    Can anyone help in this regard?
    Is it because the various dates in ECM i.e. Key date, Effective date etc are not in sync with the Appraisal period or anything?

    I am trying to do an Annual review. The status of appraisal for the selected employee was completed. I approved it and therefore the status changed to Approved. Now the earlier error i.e. - No valid appraisal document found  is gone.
    Instead I am getting the following errors now:
    (1)  Salary Adjustment (Merit) (T): Jordan Micheal does not have a salary structure acc. to basic pay record on 01/01/2010 (00000972)
    (2) Salary Adjustment (Merit) (T): Error calculating compa-ratio of Jordan Micheal on 01/01/2010 (00000972)
    Note:
    In ECM config, we are using MBO appraisal and compa-ratio matrix.
    Edited by: VS on Nov 23, 2010 12:15 PM
    Edited by: VS on Nov 23, 2010 12:21 PM

  • Multiple Appraisal Document Generation

    Hi,
    Is there a way of generating appraisal documents using Org. Structure? The scanario would be one manager appraising multiple subordinates.

    Thnx for responding Mr.Sameer.
    I am working on version 4.7 110.
    PHAP_PREPARE_PA opens the same window as PHAP_PREPARE.  The problem with using this transaction is that it offers no way of adding a HOD or a part appraiser. I am able to add only appraising manager and a list of appraisees. Besides, am not able to enter the appraisal period (The period within which the appraisal should be finished.) This option is available when a document is created using PHAP_CREATE. would there be any other way of doing this.
    Edited by: Phoebe on Jul 17, 2008 5:40 AM
    Edited by: Phoebe on Jul 17, 2008 5:40 AM

  • SSHR Performance Appraisal

    Hi,
    1) We are implementing SSHR, they are doing objective based and competency based performance appraisal. Also giving different ratings for objectives and competency. At the time of annual appraisal, system should combine both ratings of objectives and competency. Is it standard facility? If not, how can we achieve this?
    2) Our client is using Oralce Portal. Is it possible to keep iRecruitment External Candidate responsbility in one of the portlets in oracle portal?
    Thanks in advance
    MAK

    Hello All,
    My situation resemble that posted by Raad and even with some added feature request:
    We are implementing Oracle Human Capital Management(Oracle Talent Management) for a client and there are some issue that look tricky
    1. The client performs appraisal 4 times in a year: Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4
    2. The client promotes staff 2 times in a year in Q2 and Q4
    3. To calculate the final Rating for Q2 appraisal, the Final Rating of Q1 appraisal is referenced as an input e.g. Q2 Final Rating = ((Competence + Objective)/2 +(Q1 Final Rating)/4 )
    4. To calculate the final Rating for Q4 appraisal, the Final Rating of Q3 appraisal is referenced as an input e.g. Q4 Final Rating = ((Competence + Objective) /2 +(Q3 Final Rating)/4 )
    What we have done
    ================
    1.I have created a Performance Management Plan attaching 4 differnt appraisals representing Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4
    2.(Not really done yet) In the fast formula that calculates the appraisal Final Rating, IF statement will be used to determine if appraisal is Q1, Q2, Q3,or
    Q4 and appropriate calculation carried out as stated above
    My Questions
    =============
    1. How do I bypass the use of the Seeded Rating Scale method used (often called Final Rating Scale) in calculating the Final Rating of employee appraisal ?
    I will actually like to be able to do and form of arithmetic with the competence and the objective scores in order to arrive at Final score.
    2. How do I reference the past appraisals in a present appraisal period (through a fast formula). What database item to use if any?
    3. As Anand mentioned, the seeded fast formula that calculates the Final Rating (precisely SUM_COMP_AND_OBJ or AVG_COMP_AND_OBJ ) will have to be customised. How do we do this customization because I think it will go beyond just modifying the fast formula and attaching it in the appraisal template.
    Thanks

  • Need Suggestion on ECM application of Manager Self-Service Role

    Hi All,
    In ECM application When manager select an employee working under him and click on "Plan" button, it will display a page with some information in the table.The column of this table is configured in backend using SPRO t-code.Now requirement is to add one column to the table and button with name "Promotion"  on this page.but the problem is "promotion"column and button will be visible for some users only and for other users, column and button should not visible.(ex differentiate the users who logged on to portal by secter wise)
    As per the SAP delivered ECM code, now only the Personnel number of employee under manager is passing from portal to standard RFC when manger select the personal number working underhim and  click on "Plan" button and it will display the page where information are shown in table usng OADP configuration.
    Can you please provide the suggestion how the below requirement is feasible or not and if feasible how we will achieve:
    When user try to access the ECM page and click on "Plan' button, based on portal user id (wherher he belongs to some sector) it will display the next page with "Promotion" column and button.(NOTE:On Action Plan button , it will navigate to the page where details of employee will be shown who is woring under manager.Along this information we need Promotion column and button should be visible for some portal user id who belongs to ""XYZ" sector)
    Let me know if you need more clarification
    Thanks
    Susmita

    Hi,
    You just phrased my question in your words. All hooks are listed in hr_api_hooks table, each one with before and after methods.
    Now how to determine, which hook is being called by which front-end process? For example, there are three different hooks - for Appraisal, Appraisal Template and Appraisal Period.
    How to determine which one is called for my purpose, say validating before appraisal record is created.
    This is just an example. There are number of processess related to assignment change. Using trial and error method will take long time and may be unreliable result in determining actual hook.
    So, has any prepared a list of hooks to be used against each front-end process? Or has Oracle provides with any such document?
    This is highly likely if one is involved in such work area.
    Regards,
    Saurabh

  • OSA with portal integration.

    Hi Expert,
    We are implementing objective setting and appraisal supported by portal i.e. with ESS/MSS.
    As per the client requirement  I am posting my queries as mentioned below.
    1.The client does not want to route the appraisal form for an employee during the appraisal period to supervisor or reviewer as per the OM structure, instead the supervisor, reviewer & high level reviewer may be different for appraisal purpose.
    2. Is it possible to write the objectives in the appraisal form more than 80 characters. As per the existing process client writes the objects in long.
    3. How does the standard note created for each column in SAP R3 ( phap_catalog )  transaction  will behave in portal. Will these note will be created as a separate column in ESS, for use by a concerned person.
    Regards,

    Hi Prakash
    Plz find the answers below
    (1) It"ll be tricky if your client wants to use relationships other than what is defined in org structure. You may need to build a custom table to identify the reviewer, appraiser etc according to the business logic. The standard roles (MA, MB etc) defined on OSA refer to the standard reporting relationships (A/B002). Please advise your client to use exsiting relationships if you can
    (2) Try using the free input option (check box) for column OBJ0 . It shud allow u to write more than 80 char
    (3) It usually shows up as a text box attached to the respective column . So if the column is 'appraiser assessment and u have a note attached to it , the note should appear beneath the column
    Hope this helps
    regards

  • Set new value as a default value while creating PD(Performance Dailog) Form

    Hi,
    In Performance management,
    While clicking on the Create new PD Form Button, We are getting one Pop up window with the deafult selection screen.
    In that,
    We are getting Valid From: and Valid To value bydefault as a '01.01.2011' and '31.12.2011' .
    We need to change that value. How can we set our new value as a default value.
    We checked in debugging, this values are hardcoded in the SAP standard dyanpro component.
    how can we set our new default value?
    Please suggest.
    Thanks in advance.
    Monika

    You create it through PHAP_ADMIN_PA?
    The validity period is being defined by the BAdI HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DV
    Implementation HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DV02,
    can you chekc this/
    If you want to create appraisal documents for multiple participants, a
    more convenient way would be to use 'PHAP_PREPARE'. This also sets the
    validity period.
    If you still want to create the appraisal documents using 'PHAP_CREATE'
    and you want to use the BAdI for defaulting the validity period, you can
    adapt the BAdI implementation to your needs yourself. In that case,
    please make a copy of the BAdI implementation 'HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DV02'.
    When creating a new appraisal, the system suggests the period January 1
    to December 31 of the current year as the default appraisal period. You
    can change this default by changing the Business Add-In (BAdI)
    HRPDV00APPRAISAL0001 in the ERP system."

  • Talent Management-RePublishing Plans

    Hi Everybody,
    I'm unable to re-publish the plans in Talent Management, as it says that there are broken supervisor hiearchies which need to be fixed first. I ran a report and found three employees with broken hierarchies, all three employees are terminated, so I've excluded them from the system by adding them to the Eligibility Override EIT. Normally when I do that, it fixes the problem and I'm able to re-publish the plans. However, this time it hasn't worked and the employees in question are still appearing as having broken hierarchies. Can you please investigate and see if it is in fact these three employees causing the problem and if so, why the system is ignoring the fact that I've excluded them in the EIT. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

    I'm not technical, so can't comment on whether the SQL is correct. But, you can set objectives outside of the appraisal period, so your objectives might not yet be connected to a specific appraisal. Does your SQL allow for this?

  • Unable to start appraisals automatically

    Hi friends,
    I am setting up the Performance management plans in Oracle Performance Mangement. I set up the appraisals and then create the plan. While creating the plan i select the Include Appraisals option and then publish it for a "Supervisor" hierarchy. I am assuming "Supervisor" hierarchy will pick up the employees based on the assignment form. When I login as the main appraiser i dont see the appraisals started automatically for the employees under the main appraiser.
    Is something missing in the set up. Can someone please help.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Do check couple of things:-
    1. Make sure you have selected Appraisal template in the plan with appropriate Appraisal Period and Appraisal Task start and end dates.
    2. Secondly check the option where it states who starts the appraisal : Appraisee or Main Appraiser. For Appraisee starting appraisal you have to goto Employee SS to start appraisal and for Appraiser goto Manager SS and start appraisal.
    3. Run Mass appraisal creation program for your plan.
    This should help you , sort out ur problem.
    Razi

  • Training & Event Management  - Event/Attendee appraisals

    Dear all,
    My client is following 4 stage appraisal for training programs.
    Stage1- Pre-Training Test
    Stage2- Post Training Test (SAP Terminology - Attendee Evaluation)
    Stage3- Training Feedback (SAP Terminology - Business Event Evaluation)
    Stage4- Delayed feedback on performance after training from supervisor (3 months after training)
    Out of these, stages 2 & 3 can be covered by Attendee Evaluation & Business Event Evaluation.
    How and where to capture Stage1- Pre-Training Test & Stage4- Delayed feedback on performance after training from supervisor.
    For stage 4, I tried doing 'attendee appraisal' on a diif date(say 3 months after trg attended). But the appraisal period is by default coming as the training period. Hence user cannot find out which one is immediate feedback on attendee and which one is a delayed feedback.
    Daniel

    What functionality are you looking for?

  • Performance Management Plan - Customization

    Hi
    This is regarding the Performance Management Plan in Oracle Performance Management. Currently my client uses a custom concurrent program which creates appraisals by calculating the job anniversary date. The client is using yearly appraisal. But the program is scheduled to run every two weeks and picks the teammates who have completed their job anniversary in that period and creates appraisals for them.
    There is no goal setting or tracking process implemented currently. The client is not using PMP now. I would like to propose PMP to the client. The PMP would create appraisals based on the hierarchy - Supervisor, supervisor Assgn, Position, Organization.
    If a teammate is hired on 01-jan-2008 the first appraisal should be in 01-jan-2009 as per the client req now. If PMP is used it would create an appraisal in the year 2008 itself-- which is wrong as per the client requirement. Is there an option in PMP to exclude him in the current PMP and include in the next year's PMP?.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Ashish

    Hi,
    Using the PMP plan is ideal in case where the appraisal period is same across the organization. In organizations where the appraisal period differs depending on factors like hiredate, the PMP would be of a big maintenance. You will have to create PMP for each individual employee in the organization.
    I suggest instead use objective assessment also in your appraisals and not use the PMP.
    Thanks,

  • Oracle Performance Management - Notifications to Plan Population Members

    All:
    I've been working with Performance Management for several years and am implementing for a customer now.  They are on R12.1.3 RUP6.  We're creating notifications to be administered by the Performance Management Admin and the customer has asked for some simple definitions of the Plan Population Members & Statuses.  I created this matrix, based on my own understanding and assumptions and wanted to see if anyone could validate to be sure I have these definitions correct.  Please note that in the "Who Received The Message" column, where "worker" is listed in the matrix, I have only used the term "employee" since the customer is not evaluating contingent workers.  I realize worker could be either an employee or contingent worker. 
    Could anyone please tell me where I may have gotten the "Who Receives the Message" definitions wrong?  I've checked online documentation and there isn't anything I could find that makes an attempt to map this.
    Thank you,
    Mark
    Plan Population
    Who Receives The Message
    All managers in the plan
    All Managers who have active, eligible employees or terminated employees (during the appraisal period).
    All eligible workers for the plan
    All employees, regardless of their status in the plan. 
    All managers with at least one ongoing appraisal
    Managers who have not completed all appraisals for their employees.  These will be in “Ongoing with Manager” status
    All workers with appraisal pending feedback
    Employees, whose managers have submitted their performance appraisals to them, complete with Overall Rating and Performance Summary and are awaiting their response.
    All workers with at least one ongoing appraisal
    Employees who still have an appraisal sitting with them in draft form, not submitted to their manager.
    All managers with at least one incomplete scorecard
    Managers with employees who have not completed their scorecards
    All managers with at least one scorecard pending for review
    Managers who haven’t completed the review of at least one employee’s goals
    All managers with at least one scorecard not yet started
    This is when the manager begins the goal-setting process (cascading approach) and who have not started creating their employees’ goals (at least one).
    All managers with at least one scorecard in transfer
    Managers have transferred the employee’s goals back to them and the employee has not returned
    All managers with at least one scorecard transferred out
    Managers who have updated their employee’s goals and have transferred them to the employee for review.
    All workers with an incomplete scorecard
    Employees who have started working on their goals, but have not completed them and they are still in draft.
    All workers with scorecard pending for managers review
    Employees who have submitted their goals to the manager, but the managers has not acted on (updated or approved) the scorecard. 
    All workers with scorecard not yet started
    Employees who have an active scorecard, but have not opened it, started writing or saving the record. 
    All workers with scorecard in transfer
    Employees who have transferred their goals back to their manager.
    All workers with scorecard transferred out
    Employees who have transferred their goals from one plan to another plan (e.g., from Student Plan to Lab Regular Plan)
    All workers with scorecard pending with them
    Employees who have received their goals back and need to review and resubmit.
    An individual worker or manager (can select from list of values)
    This is an option when generating a notification.  You can select a single person and use a notification expressly for hers or his benefits.

    Sanjay,
    As always, thank you for responding and for your insight.  Your clarifications and thoughts here really helped.  I am also going to post what I received back from Bina Kulkarni at Oracle.  This might be helpful for anyone here looking for additional clarification on the WPM Notifications.  Thanks again for your help!
    Take care,
    Mark
    Plan Population
    Who Receives The Message
    Comments
    All managers i the plan
    All Managers who have active, eligible employees or terminated employees (during the appraisal period).
    Terminated managers will no longer be part of the plan population & hence will not receive any messages.
    All eligible workers for the plan
    All employees, regardless of their status in the plan. 
    All managers with at least one ongoing appraisal
    Managers who have not completed all appraisals for their employees.  These will be in “Ongoing with Manager” status
    All workers with appraisal pending feedback
    Employees, whose managers have submitted their performance appraisals to them, complete with Overall Rating and Performance Summary and are awaiting their response.
    All workers with at least one ongoing appraisal
    Employees who still have an appraisal sitting with them in draft form, not submitted to their manager.
    Here the Appraisal can be in Planned or Saved status.
    All managers with at least one incomplete scorecard
    Managers with employees who have not completed their scorecards
    All managers with at least one scorecard pending for review
    Managers who haven’t completed the review of at least one employee’s goals
    All managers with at least one scorecard not yet started
    This is when the manager begins the goal-setting process (cascading approach) and who have not started creating their employees’ goals (at least one).
    All managers with at least one scorecard in transfer
    Managers have transferred the employee’s goals back to them and the employee has not returned
    Points 10 & 11 below seem the be the same. I think both cases talk about Managers who have set goals for their employees and transferred the scorecard to the employees for their review.
    All managers with at least one scorecard transferred out
    Managers who have updated their employee’s goals and have transferred them to the employee for review.
    Same as above
    All workers with an incomplete scorecard
    Employees who have started working on their goals, but have not completed them and they are still in draft.
    All workers with scorecard pending for managers review
    Employees who have submitted their goals to the manager, but the managers has not acted on (updated or approved) the scorecard. 
    When employees transfer their scorecard to their managers, the manager can either approve the objectives in the scorecard or Approve and finish objective setting, whereby the scorecard status changes to 'Published' and can no longer be worked upon.
    All workers with scorecard not yet started
    Employees who have an active scorecard, but have not opened it, started writing or saving the record. 
    All workers with scorecard in transfer
    Employees who have transferred their goals back to their manager.
    All workers with scorecard transferred out
    Employees who have transferred their goals from one plan to another plan (e.g., from Student Plan to Lab Regular Plan)
    Transferred out means the employee is transferred out of the plan due to hierarchy changes, eligibility changes or termination. In this case the transferred out scorecard is no longer visible amd the objectives from such a scorecard cannot be retrieved.
    All workers with scorecard pending with them
    Employees who have received their goals back and need to review and resubmit.
    This means that the employees have not completed objective setting from their end.
    An individual worker or manager (can select from list of values)
    This is an option when generating a notification.  You can select a single person and use a notification expressly for hers or his benefits.
    I think you are referring to an Ad-Hoc approver here.
    All Appraisal Participants
    Appraisers, Reviewers or Other Participants who have not completed their appraisal feedback about the employee.
    All Approvers
    Approvers of appraisals (AME defined or added Ad-hoc)

Maybe you are looking for