Approval procedure only for the check payments

Hi All,
Is it possible to intiate the approval procedure only for the check payments in the Outgoing payments ?

Hi Anand........
Welcome to SAP Business One Forum.......
Yes it is absolutely possible to create Approval Procedure for Check Payment.
Please refer the following Query for Check Approval
Select Distinct 'True' From OVPM T0 Where T0.CheckAct is Not Null and T0.CheckSum>0
Apply above Query to Approval Procedure and assign it to proper User. and then check.......
Regards,
Rahul

Similar Messages

Adobe Form for F110 Check Payments

Currently, F110 uses an SAPScript form defined in t-code OBVU for its check payments. Is it possible to use an Adobe form instead? If so, is there a template or example anywhere? I am using t-code SFP.
Thank you for your help.
Brenda

Is it possible to use an Adobe form instead?
Of course. You will find a predelivered (next step) or create one yourself.
There is also the option to migrate the smartform but I would never do that even if I got paid for that (the result is very messy), check the details here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/16/a369b1800e4bdda978ee0fe3b7bd2c/content.htm
If so, is there a template or example anywhere?
List of SAP standard Adobe forms: Go to http://service.sap.com/erp (SAP ERP) -> Media Library - SAP ERP Overview -> Detailed information cross ERP -> Adobe Forms for SAP ERP
Standard programs:
or example anywhere?
Adapt yourself a tutorial:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c2567f2b-0b01-0010-b7b5-977cbf80665d
or learn how to enhance the standard (you will only create a brand new adobe instead of smartform if you didn´t find one):
/people/otto.gold/blog/2010/05/06/how-to-deal-with-sap-standard-adobe-forms
Regards Otto

Approval Procedure to change the price of items

Hi!
i 'm trying to create a query to an Approval Procedure to change the unit price in the Purchase Order i create this query:
SELECT DISTINCT 'True' FROM POR1 T0 INNER JOIN OITM T1 ON T0.[ItemCode] = T1.[ItemCode] WHERE T1.[ItemCode] = $[$38.1.0] AND T1.[LastPurPrc] <> $[$38.14.0]
as you see this query compare is the Last Purchase Price is different than the actual unit price, and these for each line of item.
I think this is correct, and i configure the Approval Procedure, but when i check the AP in the Purchase Order changing the Unit Price, it gets me an error that says
1) [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server] Error converting data type nvarchar to numeric.
What happend?
Am i doing something wrong ?
In easy term, i just want to execute an approval procedure when the user change the unit price in the purchase order.
Hope you can help me !
Thanks in Advance
Best Regards !

Xavier,
maybe you are with a problem thar you dont' know, i can to expain this point,
1. if you want one approval at level line (comparing prices), not possible to make this way the approval, because you don't have control at level line while the document isn't in database.
2. i bealeve that the better way is to make a store procedure for to insert each record into temp table while to add line in purchase order without (formatead seaches), now, when you create a purchase orden you need create a query for to search record in the temporal table with the condicion that you needed.
3. now, if you want to call a value on the screen (money), the better way is $[$38.1.number]
Good look,
OSCAR KLENNER
> Hi!
> i 'm trying to create a query to an Approval
> Procedure to change the unit price in the Purchase
> Order i create this query:
> SELECT DISTINCT 'True' FROM POR1 T0 INNER JOIN OITM
> T1 ON T0.[ItemCode] = T1.[ItemCode] WHERE
> T1.[ItemCode] = $[$38.1.0] AND T1.[LastPurPrc] <>
> $[$38.14.0]
> as you see this query compare is the Last Purchase
> Price is different than the actual unit price, and
> these for each line of item.
>
> I think this is correct, and i configure the Approval
> Procedure, but when i check the AP in the Purchase
> Order changing the Unit Price, it gets me an error
> that says
> 1) [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server] Error
> converting data type nvarchar to numeric.
>
> What happend?
> Am i doing something wrong ?
>
> In easy term, i just want to execute an approval
> procedure when the user change the unit price in the
> purchase order.
>
> Hope you can help me !
> Thanks in Advance
> Best Regards !

Header Details to be Printed only for the line item details.

Hi All,
I have the following requirement.
I have Page1 with the Logo, Header Window, Vendor Window, Send Invoice To, Delivere Invoice To and Main Window. Main Window Starts from the middle of the page. In the Page2 i have Logo, Header window and Main Window. In the Page3 i have only Main Window.
In the Footer of the Main Window i have Placed the Terms and conditions which should always be Printed in the New Page. So in the footer i have given a command "Go to New Page " and given the page as Page3.
The requirement is Logo,and Header Window should appear only for the Line items and not for the Terms and conditions.
For the Page1 i have given the Next Page as Page2. Suppose if there is only one line item then it Prints in the first Page itslef and the control flows to the Page2 and since in the page2 i have given the condition for the Logo and header window to print only if line item is more than 1 and since Main Window is starting from the middle there is a blank Space appearing in the start of the page.
The command i have given in the footer to trigger new page that is page3 is not getting triggered. If there are more than one line item then its printing the logo and header window and so there is no blank space appearing and it is working fine.
Please let me know how to avoid this blank space and move my main window to the start of the Page if there is only one line item.
Thank you.

Dear Vasudha,
I am a little bit confused regarding your query,
"In the Footer of the Main Window i have Placed the Terms and conditions which should always be Printed in the New Page. So in the footer i have given a command "Go to New Page " and given the page as Page3. "
When you say footer of main window does it mean , that you are using a table inside your main window and the command node your have inserted is in the footer of the table ?.I hope it is, because my suggestion is based on this assumption.
Well my suggestion for your issue is,
1.I hope you are aware we can trigger a next page in two ways, one by setting the next page static attribute & second using the command node which you have used.In your case you will have to use a combination of both.
2.I feel your First page design is ok. Set its static next page attribute to PAGE2. Similarly set the static next page attribute for PAGE2 as PAGE2 itself. This should take care of your table which you have placed in the main window. If the table contains only one lineitem it will get over in the first page itself. If the lineitems are more in the table, it will automatically triggerPAGE2 (since static next page attribute for PAGE1 is PAGE2) and the remaining line items will be displayed. Now no matter how many lineitems you have ,PAGE2 will be triggered repeatedly(since static next page for PAGE2 is PAGE2 itself) until the entire data in your table is displayed.
In this way your requirement of printing the logo and header windows for the data lineitems only will be fulfilled.
3.Now the last catch in your case is the printing of PAGE3(The terms and condition page) on an entirely new blank page.
In the footer section of the table which you have used, use a command node set to PAGE3. After the command node and under the same footer section now insert your terms and condition lineitem.
Also Check the "at End of table" checkbox and uncheck " AT PAGE BREAK" under OUTPUT OPTIONS tab for the footer section.
So now this footer section will be triggered only once after all the data in the table is displayed
4. So now if there is only one lineitem, before the default second page is triggered the command node will trigger the PAGE3 and the terms and condition will be displayed.Else if there are more lineitems the page2 will be triggered again and again and finally when all the lineitems are over, the footer of the table will get triggered. So the command node will take you to the PAGE3 wherin the terms and condition will only be displayed.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Riju

Payment advise for manual check payment

Hi,
Client wants payment advise for manual check payment.
He wants:
Reference field, Invoice date, Invoice amount, TDS deduction, Service tax deduction,WCT deduction, Amount paid
The above fields should be appeared in layout
So Could anybody please provide the logic.
Thanks,
Sai

Hi Sai,
You wil need the help of ABAP programmer to write the program for this.
Reference field, Invoice date, Invoice amount, TDS deduction, Service tax deduction,WCT deduction, Amount paid, All these fields can be picked up from BSIK,BKPF & BSEG Tables.
The Logic is to develop a Z program which will pick up for each document posted, based on Document Number and Date the data for each of the above mentioned fields from the given tables and create a Payment Advice Form on whch he will print the data.
Thank You.

MIRO should be allowed only for the accepted Qty (QC accepted qty)

Hi Friends
I have one more requirement ,
MIRO should be allowed only for the accepted Qty (QC accepted qty) or Subcontract MIRO should be allowed only for the quantity accepted by QC
with QM control key in material master(QM view) we can block for payment,
but my query is MIRO should not be saved (message should come qty still lying in Quality inspection stock)
Please let me know the settings,
Thanks & Regards
Gajendranath

Hii,
Yes it is possible to restrict Invoice passing in MIRO if the Stock is in Quality stock / Blocked stock. The concept is while doing MIRO, u can validate the criteria by clicking simulation tab. U can get the things in BADI (Business ad in function) with the BADI object name as "Invoice_update".
The working is when the material is in quality stock & If ur doing MIRO for the same material, then system will pop up the message that "material with "X" qty is in quality stock" Invoice cannot be made. System does'nt allow u to pass the Invoice unless the stock is cleared from the quality. Even for the blocked stock we can simulate these error pop message.
with regards,
K.Lokesh.

Registration procedures necessary for the invoice issuance

Hi everyone,
We had requested a new G/L account registration with FI team.
FI has registered G/L code and released for testing. Now user has reverted with query, as
Weu2019re going to use the new G/L a/c primarily to issue more of sales invoices and receive payments on this account. Could you inform us if there are other registration procedures necessary for the invoice issuance?
Kindly suggest what are all necessary steps to perform this test - to post cutomer invoices and receive collections.
Thanks in advance
-Sumi

Hi,
Though my question is unanswered, still i m closing it, as no replies for last 3 -4 days.
Thanks.
-Sumi

Approval Procedure - SAP loses the changes to the document

Good morning to all.
I need an explanation regarding the approval procedures.
We have recently upgraded the system from version 2007 SP01 PL10 to version 8.81 PL10.
We have a approval procedure whit 2 level:
User A => Create the document
User B => First level approval.
If User B approve the document then
User C => Final level approval
I noticed that in the previous version, during the phase of approvals, was created a single record in the table ODRF. This record was updated with various changes made by users during the approval phase. The changes made during the approval phase regarding UDF
Now, with the new version, I find myself with the table ODRF registering a record for each change made to the document that is pending approval.
So, if User B open the document pending approval, saves it as a draft, then edit some UDF and still saves as a draft, in ODRF table we have 2 line (the first for the first save, the second for the UDF edited and so on...)
But, when you invoke the document itself to approve or modify it, it always loads the first record from the table ODRF, thus losing all the changes.
Do you have news about this situation? Are there solutions?
Sorry for my english...

Hi GORDON.
Thank for your reply
After talking with our partners, I confirm that version 8.81 is not possible to make changes to the UDF fields in a document during the approval phase.
More precisely, the changes can be made, the document can be saved as a draft during the approval procedure, but at the time of approval, the changes are not shown.
This is because, in the drafts table (ODRF), unlike what happened in the 2007 SP01 PL10 and even in version 8.80, the changes are saved in other records (line) with other draft number ID respect to the original record, and therefore no longer recoverable and / or visible .
And, I do not understand why, there is no trace in any official document about SAP to that change.
Sono incazzato....

Is there a way to create a fade only for the first loop?

I have a loop (Modern Guitar Rock 04), which I've extended out so it repeats four times. I select the Fade Tool and X-Fade for drag. I then drag just in front of the loop and onto it, which creates a fade. However, this also creates fades at the beginning of the repeating loops. Is there a way to create a fade only for the first loop?

The loop function always repeats the same region so of course the fade is also copied. So option+drag the original region to make a (non clone) copy, fade the first region and loop the second one (which you just copied).

Transaction type to dispose the asset only for the depn areas 01 and 02

One of the Company codes XXXX plant XXXX has an isuue for asset # XXXXXXXXXX-0 this asset was partially retired in Nov.2008 and now its acquisition value is JPY312,428
which should not be an asset under US GAAP but qualify for asset under Tax book . So it needs be removed from US and JCC book(01 and 02 area) but keep the record on the Tax book(area 15).
Is there any transaction type to dispose this asset only for the 01 and 02 area but keep the historical data for 15 area?
Thanks for helping in advance

Can I suggest you a way to handle this? Just give a try and see whether it works for you or not.
Post a Credit entry to the Asset only to the area 01 and 02. Please follow the below steps before you do this.
1. Go to main SAP screen => System => User profile => Own data => Parameters
Add parameter ID FAA_FB01_AREA_SWITCH (Turn On Value Entry at Area Level for FB01) and mark "x" against it in Parameter value. Save this changes.
2. Go to F-02, Enter the Asset number (posting key 75 and transaction type 105, which ever you feel like) and then in the next screen, enter the amount. Here in this screen, you will find a tab named area values. Click that tab and change the values Area 01 & 02 to $0.01 and leave the Area 15 as it is. Enter the appropriate dr line item and save the document.
3.Go to AW01N and see tha values against each of the areas.
please revert in case you have any questions.

Function in select statement need to be called only for the last record.

Select state,
local,
fun_state_loc_other_details(19) details
from state_local
where pm_key=19
resuts:_
State Local Details
AP APlocal details1
UP UPLocal details1
MP MPLocal details1
i) The above query returns 100 records
ii) fun_state_loc_other_details is also getting called 100 times. But I want this function to be called only for the last record that is 100th record.
is there any way to do that?

Thanks amatu.
One more small query. Can I do it on condition based.
Select state,
local,
fun_state_loc_other_details(19) details
from state_local
where pm_key=19
Like if one state it need to be called once.
AP -- 50 records
UP - 20 records
MP -- 10 records.
fyi: this record no. varies
I want the function to be called for AP once, UP once, MP once.

Master Page: Alternatives (Subform Set) works only for the first page

Hi everybody!
I have bumped into a very weird problem with ADOBE Forms:
When I create an 'Alternative' in a Context area and then place it on a Master Page, it works only for the first page. On the rest of pages it always show the 'TRUE' subform, regardless of the condition (which is not changed, of course). Absolutely the same Alternative works perfectly in a Content area for all pages.
Has anybody seen something like this? Any ideas why?
Thank you!

This happens because of the processing of the form.
You can see this here:
LiveCycle ES2 * Adobe LiveCycle Designer ES2
You have to put a own variable, which is set with the value you want in the very beginning.
I know, it is not that logical in the first moment, but it makes sense.
Regards
Florian
PS: This space SAP Interactive Forms by Adobe is the correct for questions like that

Ageing analysis for the down payment made to vendors-reg

Dear Gurus,
Can anybdoy explains my how to do ageing analysis for the down payment made to various vendors.
Thanks
C.M.SATHISH KUMAR.
[email protected]

OK
Config t code is OBDF
Select AP view and due date analysis.
You need to create a variant for the field BSIK-UMSKZ in program RFKRRE01 which is the program for Vendors for due data analysis.
In the config you need to make sure create evalution is ticked.
You then need to set up a variant in program RFKRRSEL, for Vendor analysis, it should be called SAP_VARI.
Once all of that has been set up, you need to schedule a job to run for RFKRRSEL daily.
In terms of accessing the programs you need yo use t code SE38.
and to schedule a job use t code SM36.
Hope this helps.
Please award points.

Field to make uneditable only for the current/selected row

I have a web dynpro application and I wanted to make some fields uneditable and for this I have done the following:
I bound a context attribute to the readOnly property of all the fields you want to control. Then in the onEnter event of the main field, I set the value of this bound context attribute to ABAP_TRUE to change the state of the corresponding UI elements.
I have written the following in the onenter event of the main field:
DATA lo_el_context TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
   DATA ls_context TYPE wd_this->element_context.
   DATA lv_editable TYPE wd_this->element_context-editable.
* get element via lead selection
   lo_el_context = wd_context->get_element( ).
* @TODO handle not set lead selection
   IF lo_el_context IS INITIAL.
   ENDIF.
* @TODO fill attribute
* lv_editable = 1.
* set single attribute
   lo_el_context->set_attribute(
     name = `EDITABLE`
     value = 'ABAP_TRUE' ).
Now the issue is that when I hit enter on the main field all other fields gray out/uneditable for all the rows, what I want is the other fields should be greyed out only for the row where I am entering the main field and hit enter.
Can you please tell me how can I do that?
Thanks,
Rajat

Hi Raj,
You are not getting it. When you have only one context attribute and bind that to all the rows/columns of the table then everything will be enabled or disabled.
In your case, create a local node with cardinality 1:1 inside the node you already have.
Write a supply a function for this node.
Add a attribute read_only of type wdy_boolean.
bind this attribute to the read_only property of the table columns.
in the supply function based on the element conditions you might have enable this attribute of disable.
supply function method already has the necessary code , you only need to enable the commented lines and put your if ..end if code around it.
See a example.
* General Notes
* =============
* A common scenario for a supply method is to aquire key
* informations from the parameter <parent_element> and then
* to invoke a data provider.
* A free navigation thru the context, especially to nodes on
* the same or deeper hierachical level is strongly discouraged,
* because such a strategy may easily lead to unresolvable
* situations!!
* if necessary, get static attributes of parent element
DATA ls_parent_attributes TYPE wd_this->element_sflight.
parent_element->get_static_attributes(
    IMPORTING
      static_attributes = ls_parent_attributes ).
** data declaration
DATA ls_prop TYPE wd_this->element_prop.
** @TODO compute values
** e.g. call a data providing FuBa
IF ls_parent_attributes-carrid <> 'LH' .
    ls_prop-read_only = abap_true.
ELSE.
    ls_prop-read_only = abap_false.
ENDIF.
** bind a single element
node->bind_structure(
    new_item             = ls_prop
    set_initial_elements = abap_true ).

Applications are mentioned free, but when we start downloading one dollar is charged in my credit card, but only for the first time when i switch on and use it for the first time one dollar is charged. and from next application it is free. why?

Applications are mentioned free, but when we start downloading one dollar is charged in my credit card, but only for the first time when i switch on and use it for the first time one dollar is charged. and from next application it is free. why?

Kindly inform any email id or toll free number to contact apple for your below answer, Mr.King_Penguin
About receiving my credit card being debited for Free App Store Application downloads,
It should be within a few days, but it might vary a bit by bank/provider :
I am in India, if the bank don't refunds , what to do?
Rajagopal.pngr :- It is only a holding charge, it is not a permanent charge. If it isn't refunded within a few days or so (and it quite possibly won't be over a weekend) then you can query the charge with Apple.

Approval procedure only for the check payments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for